Assignment Rubric CPU

Centre for Pre-U Studies

FN106 FUNDAMENTALS OF ORAL COMMUNICATION

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
May - August 2014
Name: ______________________ ID: ________________
3
CRITERIA 2 1 0 MARKS
FN106
Content Gives very specific Contains specific Has some specific Is vague and does not
information. Addressed information. Addressed information. address all
all of the assignment all of the assignment Addressed many of assignment
components. components. Is the assignment components.
relatively detailed. components. Not
detailed.
Poorly thought out
response.
Organization Information is clearly Most information Concept and ideas are Presentation of ideas
stated and developed; presented in logical loosely connected; is choppy and
specific examples are sequence; generally lacks clear transitions; disjointed; doesn't
appropriate; conclusion very organized but flow and organization flow; development of
is clear; ideas flow better transitions are choppy. the content is vague;
together well; good between ideas are no apparent logical
transitions; succinct but needed. order to writing
not choppy; well-
organized.
Grammar Execution is excellent. Well executed. Few Execution is poor. Falls short of the
and No grammar or writing grammar or writing Many grammar or required length for
Mechanics errors. Reads easily. Is errors. Reads easily.  writing errors. Hard to the assignment. Very
well organized. Is fairly well organized. read. Poorly poorly written. Very
organized. difficult to read. No
organization is
evident. Reads like a
last minute effort. 
Critical Clearly illustrates Shows some critical and Generally competent Rudimentary and
Thinking critical and reflective reflective thinking. however information superficial. No
thinking. Full of Relatively well thought is thin and analysis or insight
thought, out response which commonplace. displayed.
insight and analysis reflects thought, insight,
and analysis has taken
place.
Support/ Substantial, logical, and Offers solid but less Offers somewhat Offers simplistic,
Reasoning concrete reasoning for original reasoning. obvious support that undeveloped support
for development of Assumptions are not may be too broad. for the ideas.
information ideas. Assumptions are always recognized or Details are too Inappropriate or off-
selected made explicit. Details made explicit. Contains general, topic
are convincingly some appropriate details not interpreted, generalizations, faulty
interpreted. and examples. irrelevant to assumptions, errors in
requirement or facts.
inappropriate.
TOTAL
Assignment Rubric CPU