Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter Ten Historical Development of Human Rights
Chapter Ten Historical Development of Human Rights
Chapter Ten Historical Development of Human Rights
RIGHTS.
Introduction
In this chapter. We shall try, once more to expand our understanding and knowledge about human
rights. This chapter will emphasize on two key issues. First, we shall unfold how human right
evolved right from the Ancient times to the present. Second we shall deal with the characteristics
of human rights and why they are distinguished from other rights. Further, we shall focus on the
various categorization of human rights as constituted by the UDHR. Finally, arguments in line
with the debate about indivisibility and prioritization of rights will be analyzed for the benefit of
the students.
Human rights are commonly understood as being those rights which are inherent in the mere fact
of being human. The concept of human rights is based on the belief that every human being is
entitled to enjoy her/his rights without discrimination. Human rights differ from other rights in
two respects. Firstly, they are characterised by being:
Inherent in all human beings by virtue of their humanity alone (they do not have,e.g., to
be purchased or to be granted);
Inalienable (within qualified legal boundaries); and
Equally applicable to all.
Secondly, the main duties deriving from human rights fall on states and their authorities or
agents, not on individuals.
Historical antecedents
Generally speaking human right are as old as humanity. This is because human rights are inherent
in man and exist because of man’s humane demand for dignity and respect as a human being they
are not a response to any social political, economic life perse.
Ancient period
1
Belief in sanctity of life (human life has an ancient precedents in many religions. The idea of
human rights based on a firm believe that human being have inviolable rights simply on grounds
of being human. It is interesting to read the Old Testament and see how life way uplifted and
justice system protecting man.
Aristotle
Aristotle is accused of having had a theory or conception which is explicit about human rights.
However, from his writing human rights as a notion is witnesses when in his political theory and
philosophy presented and talked of very important rights like equality, justice, values, right, truth
etc. For him, human rights spring from the bond that exists between men and the created state. In
other words, there is a relationship between man’s life & conduct and how the state should live,
and act. He examined human rights in his principle of natural rights and just society. He taught
that the notion of state originates from small family developing into village which ultimately
combines with other villages to form community. When it is large enough and self-sufficing, it
becomes a state. Every man strives from lower levels it higher levels. But this higher level must
be built under the principle of Equality. In order to protect every man against the power of the
striving, Aristotle introduced a system of justice and rights. Rights for him human develops from
the creation of a state so that freedom of each man is guaranteed.
In his writing we have the following notions well captured (a) Equality (b) Justice (c) Liberty or
freedom which are the foundation of human rights.
Medieval times
During the medieval times human rights was vaguely conceived. However, there are a lot of
consideration of human rights in St Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica. He held an objective
theory of human right where by the centered himself on natural rights (objective natural rights).
Aquinas use of the word jus comes from Justitia– English meaning just thing or just state of affairs.
Aquinas argues that natural law is the foundation of human rights and not positive or moral law.
Because man has a drive to know and drive for his creator, he insisted that man can easily know
what is fundamental is all man and accord it to all others.
Modern period
In the age of enlightenment (18 century) the concept of human rights emerge as an explicit
category. Here man and women were regarded as autonomous individual, endowed by nature with
certain inalienable and inviolable rights. These were supposed to be safeguarded. Human rights
were seen as elementary preconditioning for the existence of human dignity.
In particular Hugo Grotius and John Locke (1632-1704) attracted much interest in Europe.
Locke developed a list of natural rights having life being the most fundamental and liberty and
right to property being equally important.
American declaration of independent 4/7/1776 impacted rights, introducing strong sense of
inalienable rights.
2
on Human rights in June 1993. The declaration categorically states that all human rights are
universal, indivisible and interdependent and inter-related and that democracy, development and
respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms are interdependent and mutually reinforcing.
The conference reaffirmed the right to development as a universal inalienable right and an integral
part of the fundamental human rights.
The legal process in the universality of human rights effectively commenced with the universal
declaration of human rights 1948 (UDHR). Adoption of the UN charter in the aftermath of the
Second World War can rightly be considered as a landmark in the journey towards universal
acceptance of human rights.
Through a long process of evolution, modern human rights jurisprudence has crystallized into three
basic principles:
3
(b) UNCHR united nation commission of human rights – was established and they submitted a
draft which led to the establishment of universal declaration of Human rights (UDHR) in
10/12/1948 in pars. Now called human rights Day.
Types of human rights
Generally there are two types of human rights.
There are two kinds of human rights, that is, Civil and Political rights, and Economic social and
cultural rights
Whereas political rights refers to those rights which allow a person to participate in the government
of a state. For e.g. right to vote, right to be elected and right to take part in conduct of public affairs.
The nature of both civil and political rights may be different but they are inter-related and therefore
it does not appear logical to differentiate them. This reason led to the formulation of one covenant
covering both civil and political rights into one covenant i.e. International Covenant on civil and
political rights (ICCPR)
Interdependence between civil & political and Economic, social and cultural rights
Although the United Nations has recognized the above two sets of rights in two separate Covenants
i.e. International covenant on civil and political rights ( ICCPR) and International covenant on
economic social and cultural rights ( ICESCR) there is a close relationship between them. It has
been rightly realized especially by the developing countries that civil and political rights can have
no meaning unless they are accompanied by social, economic and cultural rights. Thus both
categories of rights are equally important and where civil and political rights do not exist, there
cannot be full realization of economic, social and cultural rights and vice versa.
4
Basic Characteristics of Human Rights?
Human rights are commonly understood as inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is
inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being. Human rights are thus conceived as
universal (applicable everywhere) and egalitarian (the same for everyone). These rights may exist
as natural rights or as legal rights, in both national and international law.
Human rights include the right to personal liberty and Due Process of Law; to freedom of thought,
expression, religion, organization, and movement; to freedom from discrimination on the basis of
race, religion, age, language, and sex; to basic education; to employment; and to property. Human
rights laws have been defined by international conventions, by treaties, and by organizations,
particularly the United Nations. These laws prohibit practices such as torture, Slavery, summary
execution without trial, and arbitrary detention or exile.
Classification
Human rights can be classified and organized in a number of different ways, at an international
level the most common categorization of human rights has been to split them into civil and political
rights, and economic, social and cultural rights. To start with,
5
Civil and political rights are enshrined in articles 3 to 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (UDHR) and in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
Economic, social and cultural rights are enshrined in articles 22 to 28 of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights (ICESCR).
The UDHR included both economic, social and cultural rights and civil and political rights because
it was based on the principle that the different rights could only successfully exist in combination:
The ideal of free human beings enjoying civil and political freedom and freedom from fear and
want can only be achieved if conditions are created whereby everyone may enjoy his civil and
political rights, as well as his social, economic and cultural rights. This was anchored through—
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic
Social and Cultural Rights, 1966
This is held to be true because without civil and political rights the public cannot assert their
economic, social and cultural rights. Similarly, without livelihoods and a working society, the
public cannot assert or make use of civil or political rights. This is was came to be known as known
as the full belly thesis. The indivisibility and interdependence of all human rights was confirmed
by the 1993 Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action which stated that:
All human rights are universal, indivisible and interdependent and related. The international
community must treat human rights globally in a fair and equal manner, on the same footing, and
with the same emphasis. This is in line with —Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action,
World Conference on Human Rights, 1993
This statement was again endorsed at the 2005 World Summit in New York (paragraph 121).
Although accepted by the signatories to the UDHR, most do not in practice give equal weight to
the different types of rights. Some Western cultures have often given priority to civil and political
rights, sometimes at the expense of economic and social rights such as the right to work, to
education, health and housing. Similarly the ex-Soviet bloc countries and Asian countries have
tended to give priority to economic, social and cultural rights, but have often failed to provide civil
and political rights.
Categorization
Opponents of the indivisibility of human rights argue that economic, social and cultural rights are
fundamentally different from civil and political rights and require completely different approaches.
Economic, social and cultural rights are argued to be:
positive, meaning that they require active provision of entitlements by the state (as opposed
to the state being required only to prevent the breach of rights)
resource-intensive, meaning that they are expensive and difficult to provide
progressive, meaning that they will take significant time to implement
6
vague, meaning they cannot be quantitatively measured, and whether they are adequately
provided or not is difficult to judge
ideologically divisive/political, meaning that there is no consensus on what should and
shouldn't be provided as a right
socialist, as opposed to capitalist
non-justiciable, meaning that their provision, or the breach of them, cannot be judged in a
court of law
aspirations or goals, as opposed to real 'legal' rights
Similarly civil and political rights are categorized as:
negative, meaning the state can protect them simply by taking no action
cost-free provision does not need any resources or incurring of expenditure
immediate, meaning they can be immediately provided if the state decides to
precise, meaning their provision is easy to judge and measure
non-ideological/non-political they are generally agreement on what should be provided
and given
capitalist they have strong regard to the individual interest than common social aspect
justiciable you can easily verify or show that they have been provided and can be judged
in a court of law
real 'legal' rights
Olivia Ball and Paul Gready argue that for both civil and political rights and economic, social and
cultural rights, it is easy to find examples which do not fit into the above categorization. Among
several others, they highlight the fact that maintaining a judicial system, a fundamental
requirement of the civil right to due process before the law and other rights relating to judicial
process, is positive, resource-intensive, progressive and vague, while the social right to housing is
precise, justifiable and can be a real 'legal' right.
Another categorization, offered by Karel Vasak, is that there are three generations of human rights:
b) Political rights -are those set out in Articles 19 to 21 UDHR and also codified in the ICCPR.
They include freedom of expression, freedom of association and assembly, the right to take part
in the government of one’s country and the right to vote and stand for election at genuine
periodic elections held by secret ballot (18, 19, 21, 22 and 25 ICCPR).
7
Economic, social and cultural rights -These are security-orientated rights, for example the rights
to work; education; a reasonable standard of living; food; shelter and health care. The economic
and social rights are listed in Articles 22 to 26 UDHR, and further developed and set out as
binding treaty norms in the ICESCR. These rights provide the conditions necessary for
prosperity and wellbeing.
a) Economic rights- refer, for example, to the right to property, the right to work, which one
freely chooses or accepts, the right to a fair wage, a reasonable limitation of working hours, and
trade union rights.
b) Social rights - social’ rights contain elements that require the state to abstain from interfering
with the individual’s exercise of the right. They are those rights necessary for an adequate
standard of living, including rights to health, shelter, food, social care, and the right to education
(Articles 6 to 14 ICESCR).
c) Cultural rights- The UDHR lists cultural rights in Articles 27 and 28: the right to participate
freely in the cultural life of the community, the right to share in scientific advancement and the
right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or
artistic production of which one is the author
Human rights expert Philip Alston argues that if every possible human rights element is deemed
to be essential or necessary, then nothing will be treated as though it is truly important. He urged
caution with prioritization of rights. For him the call for prioritizing is not to suggest that any
obvious violations of rights can be ignored. According to Olivia Ball, Paul Gready, Priorities,
where necessary, should adhere to core concepts such as reasonable attempts at progressive
realization and principles such as non-discrimination, equality and participation.)
Recap
What do you mean by human rights?
Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms that belong to every person in the world, from birth
until death. ... These basic rights are based on shared values like dignity, fairness, equality, respect
and independence. These values are defined and protected by law.
8
guaranteeing life, liberty, equality, and security, human rights protect people against abuse by
those who are more powerful.
9
Under human rights treaties, governments have the primary responsibility for protecting and
promoting human rights. However, governments are not solely responsible for ensuring human
rights. The UDHR states: Every individual and every organ of society.
10
Self-test Assessment
1) Why would you say that human rights are as old as humanity? 20mks
3) While paying attention to Kenyan constitution, show how it has reinforced the united nation
rights which were declared under UDHR 30mks
5) How are human rights different from other rights, (legal, moral and others)? 20mks
7) Using the above UDHR 30 human rights list, show those that are:
a) Civil rights
b) Political rights
c) Economic rights
d) Social rights
e) Cultural rights
f) Solidarity rights 30mks
11