Division of City Schools

ERNESTO RONDON HIGH SCHOOL

Road 3, Project 6, Quezon City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

SUMMARY OF ATTACHMENTS

Name of Employee/Teacher: ____________________________ Rater: _________________________

Position: _________________________ Position: _______________________
Review Period: April, 2016 – March, 2017 Date of Review: April 7,2017
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd, Division of City Schools, Quezon City

KRA I : TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS (30%)

QUANTITY RATING SCORE
1. Submitted & Implemented Daily Lesson Plan
(DLP) /Daily Lesson Log (DLL) - ( 10%)
2. Appropriate Strategies/Techniques ( 10% ) RATING SCORE

a. Lessons Using ICT

b. Lessons Using Instructional
Materials/Teaching Aids/Devices
3. Monitored & maintained safe, positive & EVIDENT
93%-100% Observed NOT
motivating environment, overall physical 5% decrease in losses/worn out=5 EVIDENT RATING
atmosphere, cleanliness, & orderliness of classroom 4% decrease in losses/worn out=4 SCORE
including waste disposal 3% decrease in losses/worn out=3
2% decrease in losses/worn out=2
( 5% ) 1% decrease in losses/worn out=1
a. Litters-free classroom/Proper waste disposal

b. Emergency Plan (DRRM)

Participate in the simultaneous earthquake drill
c. . Stress Free Classroom Setting/Positive and
Motivating Environment
d. Well-maintained school furniture/equipment
( Tables, chairs, blackboard, electric fans, etc.)

4. Managed & Maintained Discipline of EVIDENT NOT

EVIDENT
93%-100% Observed = 5 RATING SCORE
Students/Classroom Restructuring - ( 5% )
85%-92% Observed = 4
75%-84% Observed = 3
51%-74% Observed = 2
50% and below = 1
a. Class Schedule Posted at the Door
b. Classroom Rules/Guidelines or Task
Board
c. Performance Chart/Art Corner &
Related Work
d. Child Protection Policy/Anti-Bullying
Program
e. Classroom Management- Learning
Environment & Student Discipline

Page 1
 KRA II : STUDENT OUTCOMES (25%)

1. Improve Performance Indicators through Access, Quality & Efficiency - ( 10% )

1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter RATING SCORE

a. Mean Percentage Score in

NAT/PTs/Pre-test/Post-test (2%)

b and c : Failure Rate and Promotion Rate ( 6%)

A. B
TOTAL TOTAL NUMBER OF
GRADE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO PERCENT EQUIVALEN RATING SCORE
AND STUDENTS AT PASSED THE (=B/ A x100) T RATING
SECTION THE END OF SUBJECTS Rounded (Refer to
SCHOOL YEAR (Students with Final Rating
rating of 75% and Scale
Above) Below

RATING SCALE FOR b and c : FAILURE and PROMOTION RATE

RATING
SCALE 5 4 3 2 1

AVERAGE
RATING 100% 90-99% 80-89% 70-79% 69% and
Below

d. Drop-out Rate ( 2% ) ( c/o Ms. Abrigo)

Drop-out Rate for the Drop-out Rate for the Percentage
Previous School Year present School Year of RATING SCORE
(SY 2015-2016) (SY 2016-2017) Decrease

Page 2

2.MONITORED/EVALUATED & MAINTAINED STUDENTS’ PROGRESS - ( 10% )

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCES EVIDENT NOT

 EVIDENT RATING SCORE

a. Class Record

b. Grading Sheets/Consolidated Grade

Sheets /Summary of Final Rating

c. SF 1, SF2 , SF 5, F137-A, F138

d. Students’ Portfolio

e. Assessment Tools/Test Results

* Test Item Bank

* Table of Specifications

MEAN/MPS/SD of:
Diagnostic Test/Pre-Test/Post Test/
Quarterly Examinations/NAT

3. REMEDIATION/ENRICHMENT ACTIVITY - ( 10% )

REMEDIATION
GRADING TARGET MADE ACTUAL
NAMES OF STUDENTS PERIOD GRADE GRADE (Remedial GRADE
Class/
Gave Extra
Work)

75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
RATING: SCORE:
Note: You may add extra sheet/s when necessary
Page 3

KRA III - COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT (15 %)

1. Conducted regular & quarterly PTA meeting/conferences ( 5% )
 PERCENTAGE
PTA MEETINGS/CONFERENCES DATE OF RATING SCORE
ATTENDANCE

a. Election of HRO Officers/

School PTA Officers

b. Parents-Teacher Conference
( 1st Grading Period
c. Parents-Teacher Conference
(2nd Grading Period)

d . Parents-Teachers Conference
(3rd Grading Period
e . Parents-Teacher Conference

2. HOME VISITATION/CONFERENCES/MEETINGS WITH PARENTS /GUARDIANS OF

STUDENTS NEEDING ACADEMIC MONITORING/FOLLOW-UP – (5%)
HOME VISITATION/MEETINGS/
CONFERENES WITH
PARENTS/GUARDIANS DATE REMARKS RATING SCORE

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

3. INITIATED/PARTICIPATED/INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY PROJECTS, EVENTS

AND ACTIVITIES ( at least 4 activities) ( 5% )
FUNDED/SPONSORED/
ACTIVITIES DATE CONDUCTED BY: RATING SCORE

a.
b.
c.
d.

Page 4

KRA IV : PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT - (25%)

1. OBSERVED/MENTORED BY MASTER TEACHER/HEAD TEACHER ( at least twice a year with
Outstanding Rating ) - 10%
GRADE and TOPIC/ DATE OBSERVATION OBSERVED SIGNATURE
 SECTION LESSON OBSERVED RATING BY: OF
OBSERVER RATING SCORE

2. IN-SERVICE TRAINING/SEMINARS/TRAININGS/WORKSHOPS/LAC SESSIONS,

DEMONSTRATION TEACHING ATTENDED , ETC. - ( 5% )
SPONSORED/
TITLE DATE/DURATION VENUE CONDUCTED BY: RATING SCORE

3. ATTENDANCE AND PUNCTUALITY

a. ATTENDANCE - ( 3% )

Inclusive dates of absences Total number of RATING SCORE

absences

b. PUNCTUALITY – ( 2% )

Inclusive date/s of being tardy Total number of days of RATING SCORE

being tardy

Rating Scale for Attendance and Punctuality

ATTENDANCE 5 4 3 2 1
No recorded Incurred at least Incurred at least Incurred at least Incurred at least
absences or 4-8 absences 9-11 absences 12-14 absences 15 and above
Incurred 1-3 absences
absences
PUNCTUALITY 5 4 3 2 1
No recorded Incurred at least Incurred at least Incurred at least Incurred at least
tardiness/under 10-14 times of 15-19 times of 20-24 times of 25 and up
time or incurred tardiness/under tardiness/under tardiness/under tardiness/under
1-9 times of Time time time time
tardiness/under
time

Page 5

4. PARTICIPATION IN CO-CURRICULAR/SCHOOL ACTIVITIES – ( 5% )

CO-CURRICULAR/ SPONSORED/
SCHOOL ACTIVITES DATE/ VENUE CONDUCTED BY: RATING SCORE
DURATION

1.
 2.
3.
4.
5.

KRA V: PLUS FACTOR - ( 5% )

Render services over and beyond duties & responsibilities Put a
Check
RATING SCORE
Mark
1. Provided assistance to co-teachers in improving their teaching competencies
2. Assisted the school administrator in planning and managing In-Service
Trainings.
3. Served as consultant in the preparation of supplementary materials
4. Served as Demo Teacher of innovative teaching techniques/
classroom management.
5. Conducted action research where findings & recommendations have
been adopted by the school.
6. Served as subject area coordinator/chairman in school/District/division.
7. Served as grade level chairman/OIC/winning trainer/coach/
Outstanding teacher awardee.
7. Served as grade level chairman/OIC/winning trainer/coach/
Outstanding teacher awardee
Others: Pls Specify:

RATING SCALE:
3 indicators were met - 5 points
2 indicators were met - 4 points
1 indicator was met - 3 points
A performance indicator was met but no evidence - 2 points
No performance indicator was met - 1 point
OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

4.500-5.000 Outstanding

3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory

2.500-3.499 Satisfactory

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory

Below 1.499 Poor

Overall rating/assessment for the accomplishments shall fall within the
following adjectival ratings and shall be in three(3) decimal points.

______________________________ ___________________________
___________________________________
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
Department Head Principal IV
Page 6

Division of City Schools

ERNESTO RONDON HIGH SCHOOL
Road 3, Project 6, Quezon City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

SUMMARY OF RATINGS
Name of Employee/Teacher: ______________________ Rater: _______________________________
Position: Head Teacher III Position: _____________________________
Review Period: April, 2016 – March, 2017 Date of Review: April 7 , 2017
 Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd, Division of City Schools, Quezon City

KEY RESULT AREAS OBJECTIVES WEIGHT ACTUAL RESULTS

(KRA) Per
AVERAGE RATING SCORE
KRA Q E T
KRA I: SCHOOL-BASED Objective 1 5%
MANAGEMENT PLAN Objective 2 5%
( 15%) Objective 3 5%
Objective 1 10%
KRA II: SCHOOL CURRICULUM Objective 2 5%
AND EVALUATION PLAN Objective 3 10%
(35%) Objective 4 10%
Objective 1 5%
Objective 2 5%
KRA III: HUMAN RESOURCE
Objective 3 5%
MANAGEMENT ( 20% )
Objective 4 5%
Objective 1 5%
KRA IV: SCHOOL RESOURCE Objective 2 2%
MANAGEMENT (10%) Objective 3 3%
Objective 1 2%
Objective 2 6%
KRA V: SPECIAL TASKS-ASSIGNMENT
Objective 3 7%
( 15% )
KRA VI: PLUS FACTOR ( 5% ) See Indicators on 5%
the IPCRF
OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

4.500-5.000 Outstanding

3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory

2.500-3.499 Satisfactory

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory

Below 1.499 Poor

Overall rating/assessment for the accomplishments shall fall within the
following adjectival ratings and shall be in three(3) decimal points.

___________________________ LAUNCELOT T. LAUIGAN. Ed.D _________________________

Ratee Rater Approving Authority
Principal IV

Division of City Schools

ERNESTO RONDON HIGH SCHOOL
Road 3, Project 6, Quezon City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

SUMMARY OF RATINGS
Name of Employee/Teacher: ROSEMARIE C. ESPARAS Rater: DR. LAUNCELOT T. LAUIGAN_______
Position: Master Teacher 1 Position: Principal IV____________________
Review Period: April, 2016 – March, 2017 Date of Review: April 10 , 2017
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd, Division of City Schools, Quezon City

KEY RESULT AREAS OBJECTIVES WEIGHT ACTUAL RESULTS

(KRA) Per
AVERAGE RATING SCORE
KRA Q E T
 Objective 1 10% 5 5 5 5 5 .500
Objective 2 5% 2 2 2 2 2 .100
KRA I: PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
Objective 3 5%
AND DEVELOPMENT
Objective 4 5%
( 30%)
Objective 5 5%
Objective 1 3%
KRA II: INSTRUCTIONAL Objective 2 5%
COMPETENCE Objective 3 3%
(30%) Objective 4 2%
Objective 5 5%
Objective 6 2%
Objective 7 5%
Objective 8 5%
Objective 1 5%
Objective 2 5%
KRA III: INSTRUCTIONAL
Objective 3 5%
SUPERVISION
Objective 4 5%
( 25% )
Objective 5 5%
KRA IV: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Objective 1 5%
(10%) Objective 2 5%
KRA V: PLUS FACTOR ( 5% ) See Indicators on 5%
the IPCRF
OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

4.500-5.000 Outstanding

3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory

2.500-3.499 Satisfactory

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory

Below 1.499 Poor

Overall rating/assessment for the accomplishments shall fall within the
following adjectival ratings and shall be in three(3) decimal points.

ROSEMARIE C. ESPARAS LAUNCELOT T. LAUIGAN, Ed.D DR. CECILLE G.CARANDANG

Ratee Rater Approving Authority
Master Teacher I Principal IV Asst. Schools Division Superintendent

Division of City Schools

ERNESTO RONDON HIGH SCHOOL
Road 3, Project 6, Quezon City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

SUMMARY OF RATINGS
Name of Employee/Teacher: ______________________ Rater: _______________________________
Position: Master Teacher II Position: _____________________________
Review Period: April, 2016 – March, 2017 Date of Review: April 7 , 2017
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd, Division of City Schools, Quezon City

KEY RESULT AREAS OBJECTIVES WEIGHT ACTUAL RESULTS

(KRA) Per
KRA Q E T AVERAGE RATING SCORE
Objective 1 5%
Objective 2 5%
KRA I: PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
Objective 3 5%
AND DEVELOPMENT
Objective 4 5%
( 30%)
Objective 5 5%
Objective 6 5%
Objective 1 5%
KRA II: INSTRUCTIONAL Objective 2 5%
 COMPETENCE Objective 3 2%
(35%) Objective 4 5%
Objective 5 5%
Objective 6 3%
Objective 7 5%
Objective 8 5%
Objective 1 5%
Objective 2 5%
KRA III: INSTRUCTIONAL
Objective 3 5%
SUPERVISION
Objective 4 5%
( 20% )
KRA IV: COMMUNITY Objective 1 5%
INVOLVEMENT Objective 2 5%
(10%)
KRA V: PLUS FACTOR ( 5% ) See Indicators on 5%
the IPCRF
OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

4.500-5.000 Outstanding

3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory

2.500-3.499 Satisfactory

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory

Below 1.499 Poor

Overall rating/assessment for the accomplishments shall fall within the

following adjectival ratings and shall be in three(3) decimal points.
___________________________ ___________________________ ________________________
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
Principal IV

Division of City Schools

ERNESTO RONDON HIGH SCHOOL
Road 3, Project 6, Quezon City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

SUMMARY OF RATINGS
Name of Employee/Teacher: ______________________ Rater: _______________________________
Position: _________________________ Position: _____________________________
Review Period: April, 2016 – March, 2017 Date of Review: April 7 , 2017
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd, Division of City Schools, Quezon City

KEY RESULT AREAS OBJECTIVES WEIGHT ACTUAL RESULTS

(KRA) Per
AVERAGE RATING SCORE
KRA Q E T
Objective 1 10%
KRA I: TEACHING-LEARNING Objective 2 10%
PROCESS Objective 3 5%
( 30%) Objective 4 5%
KRA II: STUDENT Objective 1 10%
OUTCOMES Objective 2 10%
(25%) Objective 3 5%
KRA III: COMMUNITY Objective 1 5%
INVOLVEMENT Objective 2 5%
( 15% ) Objective 3 5%
Objective 1 10%
Objective 2 5%
KRA IV: PROFESSIONAL a. 3%
DEVELOPMENT b. 2%
Objective 3
(25%)
Objective 4 5%
KRA V PLUS FACTOR ( 5% ) See Indicators on the 5%
IPCRF

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

4.500-5.000 Outstanding

3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory

2.500-3.499 Satisfactory

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory

Below 1.499 Poor

Overall rating/assessment for the accomplishments shall fall within the
following adjectival ratings and shall be in three(3) decimal points.

___________________________ ___________________________ LAUNCELOT T. LAUIGAN, Ed.D

Ratee Rater Approving Authority
Department Head Principal IV