Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Digital Forensic Summary Evaluation Report - 1.edited
Digital Forensic Summary Evaluation Report - 1.edited
Digital Forensic Summary Evaluation Report - 1.edited
Reference No.: BatStateU-OJT-BSC-02 Effectivity Date: January 18, 2021 Revision No. 01
On-The-Job Virtual Training Activity “Webinar Series: Learn Now, Be One Later”
Title:
EVALUATION REPORT
Title of the Project or Activity: “Promoting Excellence and Expertise in Digital Forensic Examination
of Windows Artifacts: A Guide for Future Expert Witness”
Location: Batangas State University ARASOF-Nasugbu via Zoom platform and
Facebook live stream
Date of Implementation: July 02, 2021
Implementing Office/ College / Program (specify College of Arts and Sciences/ Bachelor of Science in Criminology
the programs under the college implementing the
project):
Partner Agency: Calayan Educational Foundation, Inc.
Number of Male and Female and Type of The beneficiaries/ participants are the Criminology students of Batangas
Beneficiaries (Type such as OSY, Children, State University ARASOF Nasugbu, composed of 64 Males and 74
Women, etc.): Females with a total of 138 students.
Project Leader/s:
Prof. Maria Luisa A. Valdez Dean, College of Arts and Sciences
Assoc. Prof. Mayette A. Cananea OJT/ Placement Head, BatStateU ARASOF-Nasugbu
Mr. Almerian B. Tayobong OIC-Dean & Department Chairperson, School of Criminal Justice,
Bachelor of Science in Criminology
Objectives:
The project aims to expand basic knowledge of the application of digital forensics in the examination of windows
artifacts and for them to know different ways to seize databases. Specifically, the project seeks to:
a. Give an overview of different investigative techniques and methods
b. Understand the importance of using digital forensic in the examination of windows artifacts
c. Share best practices and ensure common understanding and application of the standards
4. Number of beneficiaries/ participants who rated how organized was the webinar?
4.1 Very Good 40 (67.8%)
4.2 Good 17 (28.8%)
3.3 Fair 2 (3.4%)
4.4 Poor
5. Number of beneficiaries/participants who rated how engaging was the speaker during the webinar?
5.1 Very Good 51(86.4%)
5.2 Good 8 (13.6%)
5.3 Fair
5.4 Poor
6. Number of beneficiaries/ participants who rated how the event helped them to gain new learning or knowledge
6.1 Very Good 59 (100%)
6.2 Good
6.3 Fair
6.4 Poor
7. Number of beneficiaries/ participants who rated that the event meets their expectations?
7.1 Very Good 58 (98.3%)
7.2 Good 1 (1.7%)
7.3 Fair
7.4 Poor
8. Number of beneficiaries/ participants who rated that the pre-event information provided them a better understanding of
the event?
8.1 Very Good 48 (81.4%)
8.2 Good 10 (16.9%)
8.3 Fair
8.4 Poor
9. Number of beneficiaries/ participants who rated that the speaker or presenter was knowledgeable?
9.1 Very Good 59 (100%)
9.2 Good
9.3 Fair
9.4 Poor
Page 2 of 4
10. Number of beneficiaries/ participants who want to recommend our future events to their friends or colleagues?
10.1 Very Good 59 (100%)
10.2 Good
10.3 Fair
10..4 Poor
Demonstration
Closing Remarks
Page 3 of 4
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
Page 4 of 4