Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thermoelectric and Piezoelectric Properties in Half Heusler Compounds Taxsn (X Co, RH and Ir) Based On Ab Initio Calculations
Thermoelectric and Piezoelectric Properties in Half Heusler Compounds Taxsn (X Co, RH and Ir) Based On Ab Initio Calculations
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-020-02755-z
Abstract
In this paper, we report a theoretical study of the structural, electronic, thermoelec-
tric and piezoelectric properties of TaXSn (X = Co, Rh and Ir) half-Heusler com-
pounds crystallizing with cubic MgAgAs-type structure. We have made a quanti-
tative evaluation of thermoelectric figure of merit (ZT) and the electromechanical
coupling coefficient (k14) of these compounds. Accordingly, we intend to combine
the first-principles band structure calculations using (DFT)-based FP-LAPW
approach and the semi-classical Boltzmann transport theory within constant scatter-
ing time approximation (CSTA) to interpret and predict the thermoelectric perfor-
mance (ZTe) without the lattice thermal conductivity as a function of the chemical
potential at various temperatures. Further, to obtain a reasonable estimate for (ZT)
with the intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity, we have calculated the relaxation time
(τ) at various temperatures using Bardeen–Shockley theory. Finally, for predicting
piezoelectric coefficients, we have employed the modern theory of polarization as
provided by density-functional perturbation theory (DFPT) based on plane waves
and pseudo-potentials (PP-PW). Our key result is that these half-Heusler semicon-
ductors are attractive for practical applications in energy-harvesting technology,
which has a high (ZT) and (k14) of 0.89 and 0.25, respectively, at room temperature.
* O. Arbouche
arbouche_omar@yahoo.fr; omar.arbouche@univ‑saida.dz
Extended author information available on the last page of the article
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
5 Page 2 of 19 International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5
1 Introduction
13
International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5 Page 3 of 19 5
2 Theoretical Methodology
13
5 Page 4 of 19 International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5
13
International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5 Page 5 of 19 5
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Ground‑State Properties
Firstly, the results of structural properties of TaXSn (X = Co, Rh and Ir) compounds
in cubic MgAgAs-type structure are summarized in Table 1, together with some
available theoretical and experimental data. These results were adjusted by the Mur-
naghan equation of state [37]. Overall, a good agreement is found with the experi-
mental values of TaIrSn compound reported by Gautier et al. [10] and Zakutayev
et al. [11]. The atomic positions in cubic MgAgAs-type structure are not affected
by the optimization, because they are fixed by the high-symmetry F-43m shown in
Fig. 1. Additionally, the formation enthalpies are calculated in order to examine the
stability of our compounds using the following relation:
[ TaXSn ( b )]
Etot − ETa + EXb + ESnb
TaXSn
ΔH for = , (1)
3
TaXSn is the total energy of compound, whereas E b , E b and E b are the
where Etot Ta X Sn
ground-state energies of the stable bulk phase of tantalum crystallize in body cubic
centered structure with space group (Im3m No 229), tin with a body-centered
Table 1 The optimized lattice constants a (Å), bulk moduli B (GPa), bulk modulus pressure derivative
B′, formation energy ΔHf (eV/atom found in literature of TaXSn (X = Co, Rh, and Ir) compounds with
cubic MgAgAs-type C1b structure using GGA-PBEsol calculations
Compound a (Å) B (GPa) Bʹ Eg (eV) ΔHf (eV/atom) Ec (eV/atom)
TaCoSn
This work 5.8918 186.2674 4.1104 1.148 − 0.300 -5.0423
Exp 5.94 [11] – – – − 0.323 [39]
Other 5.95 [12] 1.09 [13]
5.95 [13] 1.07 [13]
5.97 [10] 1.16 [16]
1.107 [12]
1.153 [12]
1.37 [10]
> 1 [11]
TaRhSn
Our work 6.1268 183.6625 4.8520 1.160 − 0.395 − 5.7504
Exp – – – – − 0.484 [39] − 5.99 [39]
Other 6.207 [14] 154.6 [14] 4.67 [14] 1.25 [14] − 0.310
6.201 [10] 1.40 [10]
TaIrSn
Our work 6.1692 199.8019 4.8608 1.331 − 0.473 − 8.4192
Exp 6.175 [11] – – – − 0.548 [39]
Other 6.233 [10]
6.251 [15] 178.9 [15] 4.45 [15] 1.14 [15]
1.55 [11]
13
5 Page 6 of 19 International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5
Fig. 1 Crystal structure of
TaXSn (X = Co, Rh and Ir)
half-Heusler (MgAgAs structure
type, called Juza–Nowotny
compounds), group (F-43 m, No
216, C1b), [38, 40]
pounds in the cubic MgAgAs-type structure that are systematically calculated using
the first-principles calculations. These results show that the TaXSn (X = Co, Rh
and Ir) compounds imply the structural stability in this phase and suggest that they
can be prepared and stabilized experimentally. Also, we can see from Table 1 that
the binding energy in the TaIrSn compound is larger than the binding energy in the
TaCoSn and TaRhSn compounds.
13
International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5 Page 7 of 19 5
The electronic band structures with the (TB-mBJ) approximation of TaXSn (X = Co,
Rh and Ir) compounds along symmetry directions are displayed in Fig. 2. We remark
that our compounds exhibit semiconductor behavior with indirect bandgap. The cal-
culated band energies at the (Г-X) points are given in Table 1 and compared with
other theoretical and experimental investigations. In addition, the highly flat band
along (Г-X) in the valence band gives a significant effective mass, which is good for
thermoelectric performance.
Further, to elucidate the electronic structure of these compounds, we have calcu-
lated total and partial density of states for all the investigated compounds and rep-
resented the same in Fig. 3 within the energy interval from (− 10 to 10) eV. The
PDOS plots of TaXSn (X = Co, Rh and Ir) show that the lowest valence in the range
of (− 10 to − 7.5) eV, is derived from the Sn-p state, and very low contribution of
the other atoms. Figure 3a shows the total and partial electronic state densities of
the TaCoSn compound. It is clear that the valence band between (− 2 to − 5.90) eV
mainly consists of the Co-d states with the contribution of Ta-d states, and mainly
dominated by Ta-d state just near the Fermi level, and very low contribution of the
Sn-p state. The conduction band in the range of (0 to 5) eV is dominated by Ta-d
states, and less than by the Co-d states. The Sn-p states have been very low partici-
pation, whereas the same participation of the three atoms states located at (5 to 9)
eV from the conduction band.
As shown in Fig. 3b, a sharp peak at the valence band between − 3 eV originates
from the hybridization between Ta-d; Rh-d and Sn-5p states, while the lower part is
mainly from the Sn-p orbital near the Fermi level.
From Fig. 3c, a sharp peak at the valence band of TaIrSn compound is observed
in the range of valence band in the range of (− 5.90 to – 2) eV. These peaks origi-
nate from the Ir-d and d-Ta states. Other sharp peaks are derived from the both Ta-d
Fig. 2 Bandgap energy of all compounds TaCoSn (a), TaIrSn (b) and TaRhSn (c)
13
5 Page 8 of 19 International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5
Fig. 3 Total and partial densities of states (DOS) for TaCoSn (a), TaIrSn (b) and TaRhSn (c)
and Ir-d states and located at (− 2 to 0) eV. The contribution of the Ta-d band is the
highest in the range of (0 to 5) eV in the conduction band, and the same contribution
of d-Ta, d-Ir and p-Sn states in the range of (5 to 9) eV.
In general, the dense electronic states of these compounds at the vicinity of Fermi
level suggest a large Seebeck coefficient and hence also the thermoelectric power
factor, which will be discussed in the next subsection.
3.3 Thermoelectric Properties
S2 𝜎T
ZT = , (3)
𝜅e + 𝜅in
where S, σ , 𝜅e , 𝜅in , and T are the Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, elec-
tronic thermal conductivity, intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity and absolute tem-
perature, respectively. In this section, we first present the results of the semi-clas-
sical Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) for electrons which requires knowledge
of the electron density of states (DOS) as incorporated in BoltzTraP code. Under
13
International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5 Page 9 of 19 5
rigid band approximation (RBA) the Fermi level will move up the bandgap or down
through the chemical potential (μ) depending on doping type, but the underlying
band structure is not allowed to change. Within the constant scattering time approxi-
mation (CSTA), the relaxation time (τ) is independent of the energy levels and
k-points and assuming to be ~ 10–14 s. The output of BoltzTraP includes the dimen-
sionless figure of merit ZTe as shown in Eq. 4, while BoltzTraP is mainly thought of
as a tool to evaluate only the electronic contribution to the thermal conductivity 𝜅e
of TaXSn (X = Co, Rh and Ir) compounds are being calculated with respect to the
relaxation time (τ).
S2 𝜎T
ZTe = . (4)
𝜅e
13
5 Page 10 of 19 International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5
Fig. 6 Electronic thermal conductivity TaCoSn (a), TaIrSn (b) and TaRhSn (c)
values with n-type, which reveals that the large Seebeck coefficient originates from
the corrugated (Г-X) in valence band.
The electrical conductivity with respect to relaxation time (σ/τ) with the varying
Fermi level at temperatures 300 K, 500 K and 700 K is also calculated and shown
in Fig. 5. It is observed that the electrical conductivity of these compounds at high
positive value of chemical potential rises slightly with the increase in temperature.
13
International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5 Page 11 of 19 5
Fig. 7 Power factor of all compounds TaCoSn (a), TaIrSn (b) and TaRhSn (c)
Fig. 8 Figure of merit of all compounds TaCoSn (a), TaIrSn (b) and TaRhSn (c)
The carrier density enhances with temperature which improves the electrical con-
ductivity. The value of electrical conductivity is large at positive values of chemical
potential as compared to negative values, which shows that the n-type structure has
better electrical conductivity than p-type doping.
Moreover, the potential to produce efficient electrical power for a material is
measured by its power factor (PF). Figure 6 demonstrates our calculated results
of power factors PF with respect to the relaxation time, which results from the
product of the square of Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity (PF = S2
13
5 Page 12 of 19 International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5
σ/τ). We observed that the highest value of power factor of TaCoSn, TaRhSn
and TaIrSn compounds takes the values of 19 × 1011 W·m−1·K−2·s−1, 18 × 1011
W·m−1·K−2·s−1 and 17 × 1011 W·m−1·K−2·s−1, respectively, and is studied for
p-type doping at 700 K. Our analysis of (PF) potently accords with the results of
Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity. Hence, one can expect TaCoSn to
have higher electrical conductivity than TaRhSn and TaIrSn compounds, which is
another factor responsible for the large power factor.
On the other hand, Fig. 7 displays the electronic thermal conductivity calcu-
lated for TaXSn (X = Co, Ir and Rh) compounds with chemical potential (μ) at
different temperatures. It is clearly observed that TaCoSn compound has high
value of electronic thermal conductivity at high temperature and high chemical
potential as compared to TaRhSn and TaIrSn compounds. This fact is due to the
increase of both free electrons energy and vibrational energy in these compounds
as temperature is raised, because the freely moving valance electrons are not only
transferring the electric current but also heat energy.
Figure 8 shows the variation of the figure of merit (ZTe ) at 300 K, 500 K and
700 K versus chemical potential (μ). From this figure, it is noted that at room
temperature 300 K, the TaIrSn compound has value around unity but TaRhSn
and TaCoSn compounds the maximum value of (ZTe ) is about 0.99 and 0.98,
respectively. One might speculate that the origin of this large (ZTe ) around the
mentioned points is due to the power factors (PF) and low thermal conductivity.
Figure of merit (ZTe ) increases abruptly from 0.05 eV value of chemical potential
and the peak value is obtained, which occurs at the chemical potential around
Fermi level and 0.05 eV for these compounds, but the value of figure of merit
decreases sharply after downward at the vicinity of Fermi level and upward from
0.05 eV. Overall, these compounds are good thermoelectric candidates in values
of chemical potential ranging from near Fermi level to 0.05 eV for n-type doping
is due to the large Seebeck coefficient and low thermal conductivity.
The purpose of the next step is to calculate the intrinsic lattice thermal con-
ductivity via the bulk and shear moduli of the material using Slack’s equation to
obtain a reasonable estimate for (ZT) . These half-Heusler materials are consid-
ered a suitable high-mobility solar material due to their effective mass less than
1.5m0 [41]. It is widely known that if the photo-generated carrier’s effective mass
is smaller, the carriers will be more likely to achieve the surface response sites
in their lifetime. The mobility difference of electrons and hole is greater when
the relative ratio of mh*/me*, which is far from 1 and thus the recombination rate
of electron–hole photo-generated pairs is small [42]. The following formula can
obtain the effective mass of an electron or a hole:
( 2 )−1
d E(k)
m∗e(h) = ℏ2 , (5)
dk2
where ћ is the reduced Planck’s constant, k is the wave vector, and E(k) is the elec-
tronic energy for the wave vector. Effective mass of hole obtained using both effec-
tive mass of heavy-hole and light-hole is shown in the following formula [43]:
13
International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5 Page 13 of 19 5
√
3 ( )2
m∗h = m∗HH 3∕2 + m∗LH 3∕2 . (6)
First consideration is given to the effective electron mass near the CBM. The
calculated effective masses of the heavy-hole and light-hole band of our com-
pounds are listed in Table 2. This table shows clearly that the effective mass of
hole is higher than the effective mass of electrons, which indicates that these
compounds represent p-type semiconductors. In our obtained result, we find that
the electron–hole recombination is weak for the TaCoSn compound. We can
deduce that TaCoSn compound will have a greater potential to separate photo-
excited pairs of electron–hole compared to both TaRhSn and TaIrSn compounds.
The edges of the energy bands flatten with increasing temperature, which means
that the energy bands become heavier. This leads to an increased effective mass
of carriers that affects the material’s transport properties.
The mobility of the charge carriers 𝜇 is calculated using the following formula
[43]:
√
2 2𝜋eℏ4 c11
𝜇= , (7)
3(kB T)3∕2 m∗ 5∕2 VDP
2
where e is the electron charge, ℏC11 is reduced Planck’s constant, is one of the three
independent elastic constants, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and VDP is the deforma-
tion potential constant which is calculated using:
dEedge
VDP = (8)
d𝛼
a − a0
𝛼=
a0
, (9)
where Eedge is the energy at the valence band maximum (VBM) or conduction band
minimum (CBM), 𝛼 is the uniaxial strain along the direction of the lattice vector
a . The strain is defined by varying a with respect to the calculated equilibrium lat-
tice constant a0 . The carrier mobility will change with changing temperature, which
induces the relaxation time values. The relaxation time has been calculated with dif-
ferent temperatures (T = 300 K, 500 K and 700 K), using the following formula:
13
5 Page 14 of 19 International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5
𝜇m∗
𝜏= . (10)
e
Results of relaxation time with dependence of temperature effect are calculated as
the following equation:
√
2 2𝜋ℏ4 C11
𝜏= . (11)
3(kB T)3∕2 m∗ 3∕2 VDP
2
The most robust conclusion from Table 3 is that the relaxation time 𝜏 of elec-
tron is greater than of hole. In the other hand, the Seebeck coefficient of material
increases with increasing in the effective mass of the carrier.
The intrinsic thermal conductivity of materials can be calculated in different
ways. Naydenov [43] revealed a mathematical formula for calculating intrinsic lat-
tice thermal conductivity via the bulk and shear moduli of the material using Slack’s
equation is given by the following equation:
1∕3
𝜃D3 Va mav
𝜅in = A , (12)
𝛾 2 n2∕3 T
where 𝜃D , Va , mav , 𝛾 and n are the Debye temperature, the volume per atom (in Å),
the average atomic mass, the Gruneisen parameter and the number of atoms in the
unit cell, respectively. The parameter A is given by the following equation:
2.43 × 10−6
A= 0.514 0.228
. (13)
1− 𝛾
− 𝛾2
The Gruneisen parameter can be obtained from the Poisson ratio 𝜐 in the follow-
ing way:
( )
3 1+𝜐
𝛾= . (14)
2 2 − 3𝜐
Table 4 gathered these parameters for TaXSn (X = Co, Rh and Ir) com-
pounds. Intrinsic thermal lattice conductivity 𝜅in of TaXSn (X = Co, Rh and Ir)
13
International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5 Page 15 of 19 5
Table 4 The Gruneisen parameter 𝛾 , A coefficient, Debye temperature 𝜃D , volume per atom Va (in Å), the
average atomic mass mav (in amu), the number of atoms n in the unit cell and Poisson ratio 𝜐
Components 𝛾 A 𝜃D Va mav n v
–4 –22
TaCoSn 1.677 3.136 × 10 356.335 68.5238 5.9546 × 10 3 0.284
244 [46]
TaRhSn 1.742 3.115 × 10–4 328.026 76.66 6.6848 × 10–22 3 0.295
1.7 [13] 313.02 [13]
TaIrSn 1.932 3.056 × 10–4 299.717 78.265 8.167 × 10–22 3 0.324
1.29 [14] 312.54 [14] 0.31 [14]
Fig. 9 The intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity of all compounds when obtained by Slack’s equation
13
5 Page 16 of 19 International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5
Fig. 10 Temperature dependence of the dimensionless thermoelectric figure of merit (ZT) and (ZTe) for
TaXSn (X = Co, Rh and Ir) half-Heusler compounds
3.4 Piezoelectric Properties
In this section, we will also examine the possible piezoelectric effect in TaXSn
(X = Rh,Co and Ir) half-Heusler compounds using the pseudo-potential plane
wave (PP-PW) approach in the framework of the (DFT) and the (DFPT) within
GGA exchange–correlation energy functional. Therefore, these calculations are
defined as the second derivative of the total energy with respect to the atomic
displacement within the framework of first-principles calculation. Among the
five symmetry classes belonging to the cubic system, only Hextetrahedral crystal
(43 m) and tetartoidal form (23) are noncentrosymmetric structures and hence,
they are good candidates for piezoelectric, for the others structures such as hex-
octahedral (m3m), gyroidal (432) and diploidal (m3), the piezoelectric effect
is absent, because of the centrosymmetric nature. For the cubic AgMgAs-type
structure F-43m symmetry, there are three independent elastic constants ( C11 , C12
and C44 ) and the piezoelectric tensor (eij ) contains only one constant e14 (in the
direct piezoelectric effect).
The calculated results of lattice parameter, the linear bulk piezoelectric, die-
lectric and elastic constants were carried out by using the ANADDB module of
13
International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5 Page 17 of 19 5
Table 5 The calculated lattice constants a (Å), elastic constant ( C11 , C12 and C44 ) in (GPa), piezoelectric
coefficients (e14 (C/m2) and d 14 (pc/N)), electromechanical coupling coefficient k14 and zero-stress static
dielectric constant 𝜀0 using GGAcalculations
Compo- a0 (Å) C11 C12 C44 e14 d14 ϵ0 k14
nents
the ABINIT package and are summarized in Table 5. Indeed, our theoretical lat-
tice constants obtained with PP-PW method are in excellent agreement with those
obtained with FP-LAPW method within GGA-PBEsol calculations and the avail-
able experimental data and previous theoretical works are reported in Table 1.
Our results of elastic constants for these compounds should satisfy Born’s criteria
to prove its mechanical stability C44 > 0, C11 + 2C12 > 0 and C11 − C12 > 0 . Over-
all, a good agreement of elastic constants of TaXSn (X = Rh,Co and Ir) compound
is found with compared to [12, 15, 44]. In addition, the converse piezoelectric
coefficient d14 it is usually expressed in pC/N (unit charge/Newton), is related to
the elastic constant C44 and the direct piezoelectric coefficient e14, by the follow-
ing formula given below:
d14 = e14 ∕C44 . (15)
The calculations of static dielectric (relaxed ions) constant by mean of linear-
response calculations are defined as the second derivative of the total energy with
respect to the atomic displacement, from which we obtain the zero-stress static
dielectric constant 𝜀0 . Thus, these results determine the conventional figure of
merit for piezoelectric performance k14 using the following formula given below:
√
k14 = ||e14 ||∕ C44 𝜀fs 𝜀0 , (16)
where εfs = 8.85 E−12 is the permittivity of free space [45]. We present these pre-
dictions first for all compounds in the cubic MgAgAs-type structure, are included
in Table 5. We find that TaCoSn compound are of good the electromechanical cou-
pling coefficient k14 being in the order of 0.254 within GGA approach, and can be
candidate for piezoelectric applications. As a guide for experimental investigation of
piezoelectric half-Heusler compounds, we highlight a selection of candidate com-
pounds chosen according to the relevant practical considerations.
13
5 Page 18 of 19 International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5
4 Conclusion
Conflict of interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of
this paper.
References
1. S. Chibani, O. Arbouche, K. Amara, M. Zemouli, Y. Benallou, Y. Azzaz, B. Belgoumène, M.
Elkeurti, M. Ameri, J. Comput. Electron. 16, 765–775 (2017)
2. S. Chibani, O. Arbouche, M. Zemouli, Y. Benallou, K. Amara, N. Chami, M. Ameri, M. El Keurti,
Comput. Condens. Matter 16, e00312 (2018)
3. S. Chibani, O. Arbouche, M. Zemouli, K. Amara, Y. Benallou, Y. Azzaz, B. Belgoumène, A. Ben-
tayeb, M. Ameri, J. Electron. Mater. 47, 196–204 (2018)
4. R. Yan, W. Xie, B. Balke, G. Chen, A. Weidenkaff, Realizing p-type NbCoSn half-Heusler com-
pounds with enhanced thermoelectric performance via Sc substitution. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater.
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2020.1726715
5. X. Zhang, Yu. Liping, A. Zakutayev, A. Zunger, Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 1425–1435 (2012)
6. S. Kacimi, H. Mehnane, A. Zaoui, J. Alloy. Compd. 587, 451–458 (2014)
7. A. Roy, J.W. Bennett, K.M. Rabe, D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. Lett 109, 037602 (2012)
8. Z.W. Wang, G.T. Wang, Phys. Lett. A 381, 2856 (2017)
9. J. Wei, G. Wang, J. Alloys Compd. 757, 118–123 (2018)
10. R. Gautier, X. Zhang, H. Linhua, Y. Liping, Y. Lin, T.O.L. Sunde, D. Chon, K.R. Poeppelmeier, A.
Zunger, Nat. Chem 7, 308–316 (2015)
11. A. Zakutayev, X. Zhang, A. Nagaraja, L. Yu, S. Lany, T.O. Mason, D.S. Ginley, A. Zunger, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 135, 10048–10054 (2013)
12. E. Haque, M.A. Hossain, Results Phys. 10, 458–465 (2018)
13. K. Kaur, Ceram. Int. 43, 15160–15166 (2017)
14. K. Kaur, R. Kumar, Phys. Lett. A 381, 3760–3765 (2017)
15. S. Bhattacharya, G.K.H. Madsen, J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 11261 (2016)
16. D.M. Hoat, Comput. Mater. Sci. 159, 470–477 (2019)
17. E. Sjöstedt, L. Nordström, D.J. Singh, Solid State Commun 114, 15–20 (2000)
18. W. Kohn, L.J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133-1138 (1965)
19. P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G.K.H. Madsen, D. Knasnicka, and J.Lunitz,Wien2k, An Augmented Plane
Wave Plus Local Orbital Programme for Calculating Crystal Properties, Vienna University of
Technology, Vienna, Austria, 2001.
13
International Journal of Thermophysics (2021) 42:5 Page 19 of 19 5
20. J.P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G.I. Csonka, O.A. Vydrov, G.E. Scuseria, L.A. Constantin, X. Zhou, K.
Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)
21. F. Tran, P. Blaha, M. Betzinger, S. Blügel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 226401 (2009)
22. N.A. Sinitsyn, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 023201 (2008)
23. G.K. Madsen, J. Carrete, M.J. Verstraete, Comput. Phys. Commun. 231, 140–145 (2018)
24. J. Bardeen, W. Shockley, Phys. Rev. 80, 72 (1950)
25. G.A. Slack, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 34, 321 (1973)
26. A. Dal Corso, Phys. Rev. B 64, 235118 (2001)
27. X. Gonze, C. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 55, 10355 (1997)
28. X. Gonze et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 25, 478 (2002)
29. X. Gonze et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2582 (2009)
30. X. Gonze, F. Jollet et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 205, 106–131 (2016)
31. G. Arlt, P. Quadflieg, Phys. Status Solidi 25, 323 (1968)
32. H.J. Monkhorst, J.D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976)
33. J.D. Pack, H.J. Monkhorst, Phys. Rev. B 16, 1748 (1977)
34. A.M. Rappe, K.M. Rabe, E. Kaxiras, J.D. Joannopoulos, Phys. Rev. B 41, 1227 (1990)
35. N.J. Ramer, A.M. Rappe, Phys. Rev. B 59, 12471 (1999)
36. J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, [Phys. Rev. B 45, 13244 (1992)]. Phys. Rev. B 98, 079904 (2018)
37. F.D. Murnaghan, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 30, 244–247 (1944)
38. D.J. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 81, 195217 (2010)
39. J.E. Saal, S. Kirklin, M. Aykol, B. Meredig, C. Wolverton, The open quantum materials database
(OQMD). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013)
40. H. Nowotny, K. Bachmayer, Monatsh Chem 81, 488 (1950)
41. Predicted lead-free perovskites for solar cells, R Ali, G-J Hou, Z-G Zhu, Q-B Yan, Q-R Zheng, G
Su. Chem. Mater. 30, 718–728 (2018)
42. K. Ding, B. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, Z. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 8294–8303 (2014)
43. G.A. Naydenov, P.J. Hasnip, V. Lazarov, M. Probert, J. Phys. Mater. 2, 035002 (2019)
44. X. Wu, D. Vanderbilt, D.R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B 72, 035105 (2005)
45. M. de Jong, W. Chen, H. Geerlings, M. Asta, K.A. Persson, A database to enable discovery and
design of piezoelectric properties. Sci. Data 2, 150053 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.53
46. S. Li, H. Zhu, J. Mao et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 41321–41329 (2019)
Affiliations
13