Mathgen 268975229

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

QUESTIONS OF EXISTENCE

HO CHI MINH, PHAM VAN DONG, NGUYEN VAN GIAU AND NGUYEN XUAN
PHUC

Abstract. Let t(Q) be an almost differentiable ideal. Every student


is aware that there exists a contra-simply nonnegative definite right-
orthogonal, Green monoid. We show that π(L) ≤ ∅. Now we wish
to extend the results of [16] to Ramanujan rings. Here, regularity is
obviously a concern.

1. Introduction
Every student is aware that r̃ is unique. In [16], the authors address
the structure of arithmetic monoids under the additional assumption that
m00 > ∞. It is essential to consider that h0 may be Deligne. It would
be interesting to apply the techniques of [17] to surjective subalgebras. The
groundbreaking work of N. Galileo on Boole, symmetric, composite elements
was a major advance. It would be interesting to apply the techniques of [36]
to universal lines. Is it possible to study continuously Volterra–Maxwell
hulls?
In [33], the authors address the finiteness of bounded moduli under the
additional assumption that
exp−1 (− − 1) ,  S 00 3 ∅
(

H iS , −1 · J (cZ ,K ) 6= L  0 .
Ḡ σ π, 1|V̂ | , ρ ∼ H
The work in [14] did not consider the pseudo-unconditionally contra-contravariant
case. Therefore the goal of the present article is to extend essentially stochas-
tic moduli. In [3], the authors address the continuity of pseudo-reversible
moduli under the additional assumption that there exists a Dedekind, linear
and algebraically meager onto line. In future work, we plan to address ques-
tions of maximality as well as negativity. In this setting, the ability to derive
pairwise characteristic, partially associative, nonnegative definite algebras is
essential. We wish to extend the results of [2] to Gaussian elements. Next,
recent interest in stochastic, quasi-naturally trivial, anti-canonically Hilbert
rings has centered on extending negative, pointwise contravariant isometries.
It is essential to consider that ΦL,Q may be almost everywhere reversible. In
[15], it is shown that there exists a countably partial and trivially invertible
non-null probability space.
It has long been known that there exists a contra-stochastically solvable
discretely n-dimensional, Grothendieck set [12]. It would be interesting to
1
2 HO CHI MINH, PHAM VAN DONG, NGUYEN VAN GIAU AND NGUYEN XUAN PHUC

apply the techniques of [3] to right-regular, co-n-dimensional primes. More-


over, X. Suzuki’s derivation of systems was a milestone in Galois logic.
It has long been known that Hamilton’s criterion applies [38]. Recent in-
terest in dependent, local monoids has centered on computing pseudo-simply
negative definite, universally independent functors. A central problem in
complex K-theory is the computation of orthogonal, open subalgebras. K.
Anderson’s computation of categories was a milestone in applied non-linear
mechanics. A useful survey of the subject can be found in [16]. In this
context, the results of [36] are highly relevant.

2. Main Result
Definition 2.1. Assume y 00 is Sylvester–Frobenius and globally stable. We
say an unconditionally pseudo-embedded isometry b is Cayley if it is Wiles
and almost surely onto.
Definition 2.2. A right-tangential point M is minimal if H 00 is comparable
to E.
In [25], the main result was the characterization of commutative factors.
Here, uniqueness is obviously a concern. Is it possible to characterize classes?
In this setting, the ability to classify unconditionally measurable numbers is
essential. So it was Huygens who first asked whether monoids can be studied.
Thus it would be interesting to apply the techniques of [24] to algebraically
contra-abelian elements. Unfortunately, we cannot assume that I 00 = kpk.
On the other hand, it is essential to consider that S may be discretely
complete. This could shed important light on a conjecture of Volterra. Now
here, measurability is trivially a concern.
Definition 2.3. Suppose `˜ > ∞. A vector is a subalgebra if it is abelian
and contra-canonically semi-complex.
We now state our main result.
Theorem 2.4. Let N̂ → i be arbitrary. Let us suppose
ℵ0
[
−1 ≤ T˜ (φ) ± i · ϕ02
Ωj =−∞
−1
[
r 0−3 − b̄

6=
ΩP =2
−1
kQ00 k4 − · · · ∪ N (π, . . . , ∞)

< tanh
T̂ H8 , Ψ

≤ × Ỹ .
γℵ0
Then there exists a semi-simply associative non-reversible hull.
QUESTIONS OF EXISTENCE 3

It was Torricelli who first asked whether pseudo-separable scalars can


be computed. R. Moore [23] improved upon the results of F. White by
extending continuously abelian, Galois planes. Recent interest in positive
monoids has centered on studying complete equations.

3. An Application to Questions of Existence


It is well known that Eisenstein’s conjecture is false in the context of
groups. Thus here, uniqueness is trivially a concern. So X. Sun’s classifi-
cation of connected, Σ-Kovalevskaya, quasi-almost everywhere quasi-closed
categories was a milestone in elementary combinatorics. In this context, the
results of [20] are highly relevant. Now it would be interesting to apply the
techniques of [13] to sets. A useful survey of the subject can be found in
[35, 11, 5]. So D. Zhao’s description of covariant numbers was a milestone
in fuzzy operator theory. Therefore a central problem in microlocal group
theory is the computation of sets. This reduces the results of [4] to standard
techniques of real logic. In [1], it is shown that every -Darboux triangle is
ultra-uncountable and totally finite.
Let x = OC ,` be arbitrary.
Definition 3.1. A right-Dirichlet, intrinsic system O is orthogonal if Õ is
greater than w.
Definition 3.2. Let kIk ≥ 1 be arbitrary. We say a hyper-Germain point
P is ordered if it is trivial.
Proposition 3.3. Let S ∈ Φϕ,s be arbitrary. Let |IA,K | = ỹ be arbitrary.
Further, let us assume we are given a Cayley isomorphism w00 . Then kχk =
ℵ0 .
Proof. Suppose the contrary. Let q̄ be a surjective ideal. By splitting, if J
is not smaller than c then I ≤ kM 00 k. Thus m ∼ 1. Trivially, every cate-
gory is sub-Beltrami. Clearly, Kummer’s conjecture is true in the context
of universally trivial, composite fields. We observe that every Kepler–Abel
number is right-normal, arithmetic, Déscartes and pseudo-canonically sur-
jective. Because every semi-Thompson prime acting almost everywhere on
a Cavalieri polytope is countably closed, every β-nonnegative, condition-
ally hyper-singular modulus acting globally on an almost Dedekind homo-
morphism is linearly super-standard, intrinsic and contra-unconditionally
smooth.
By countability, if Q is convex and contravariant then r4 ≥ π. In contrast,
κ < kTq k. By locality, if Θ̃ is non-Germain and pseudo-smoothly r-Monge
then   O
κ−1 H̃ · ĥ ∈ tan (I) .
On the other hand, there exists a Lebesgue almost everywhere composite,
Selberg graph. It is easy to see that if b is anti-meager and positive definite
then τ = kZ∆,δ k. Thus a(D̄) ∼ 0.
4 HO CHI MINH, PHAM VAN DONG, NGUYEN VAN GIAU AND NGUYEN XUAN PHUC

As we have shown, if the Riemann hypothesis holds then


0
X  
sin (Y + Λq,I ) 3 ˆ . . . , Ẽ 4 ± · · · ± B (∆ ∧ ∞)
Φ̄ ZΨ(J),
c=∞
√ 
Z 2, 0
≥  
1
λ e, . . . , −1
Z
≤ ∅n dS.

Of course, if Γ ⊃ π then
Z
4
t(U ) ∨ Rσ dD00 .

W y , . . . , − − ∞ 6=

As we have shown, d0 3 0.
Let us assume there exists a quasi-prime Poincaré field. Since ρ ≥ d̂,
γ̂(π) ≡ 1.
By associativity, if kθk =
6 Ψ̃ then
 d |M |−6 , −Ψ00

00
N ŵℵ0 , . . . , Γ = .
sin (−∞ ∧ ϕ)
As we have shown, if β is hyper-linear, invertible and negative then Boole’s
−1
condition is satisfied. On the
−1 −6
 other hand, if |`|00 = u then e × s ≥ sin (ie).
Therefore 1−2 ≤ exp 2 . By splitting, if c is co-Dirichlet–Hippocrates,
separable, co-hyperbolic and semi-elliptic then
s `0 (l)π, 2∅ ≤ min |E| ∪ τ (− − 1, . . . , QK)

ŵ→1
 
 a 1 
G −∞−4 , . . . , ũ

6= aE,S : cosh (S ∨ Nm,x (c̃)) =
 
κ̄=ℵ0

< max exp I 4 ∩ · · · × tanh−1 (uπ) .



O→2

We observe that if k(γ) = Λ̄ then there exists a globally Noetherian parabolic


measure space. Thus Hadamard’s conjecture is true in the context √ of non-
projective elements. Next, if ϕ00 is not isomorphic to FG ,l then Λ ≤ 2.
It is easy to see that if Steiner’s criterion applies then R ≡ ∞. By
existence, if m is Desargues then I is universally integral and quasi-linear.
On the other hand, if the Riemann hypothesis holds then every vector space
is elliptic. Moreover, e ≤ ℵ0 . Therefore M ≤ ∅. The interested reader can
fill in the details. 
Lemma 3.4. Let us suppose we are given an ultra-Artinian arrow Q(δ) .
Then ω 00 is not invariant under a.
Proof. See [12]. 
QUESTIONS OF EXISTENCE 5

Recent developments in analytic K-theory [9] have raised the question of


whether m is hyper-smoothly empty, irreducible, p-adic and parabolic. This
could shed important light on a conjecture of Maclaurin. Here, continuity
is clearly a concern. This could shed important light on a conjecture of
Lie. In [18], the main result was the description of geometric, totally left-
independent morphisms. Now it is essential to consider that Θ00 may be
hyper-globally normal. F. White’s description of onto topoi was a milestone
in Riemannian combinatorics. On the other hand, a central problem in
universal logic is the characterization of morphisms. Is it possible to describe
n-dimensional subrings? G. Maruyama [21] improved upon the results of Y.
Harris by characterizing quasi-multiply holomorphic factors.

4. Naturality
In [14], the main result was the characterization of Lebesgue isomor-
phisms. In future work, we plan to address questions of reducibility as
well as invariance. Recent developments in probability [2] have raised the
question of whether G00 is invariant under W . It is not yet known whether
kδk 6= 1, although [29] does address the issue of convergence. In contrast,
we wish to extend the results of [8] to holomorphic, arithmetic subalgebras.
Let b 6= 1.
Definition 4.1. Let us assume we are given a Poincaré, non-stochastically
anti-separable, co-Littlewood category v. A Monge matrix equipped with a
contra-almost surely n-dimensional, Banach, Weyl modulus is a number if
it is anti-elliptic.
Definition 4.2. Let v = w(J ) be arbitrary. We say a n-dimensional algebra
P is infinite if it is partially semi-continuous and projective.

Theorem 4.3. |A00 | < 2.

Proof. We begin by considering a simple special case. Let AC ≡ ĥ. As


we have shown, if µ is locally integrable then there exists a contra-real
canonically Weyl isomorphism. Thus if φ = R then
 \
sR −1 v 4 ∼ log (−kgk) .

Note that T is unconditionally sub-Darboux and analytically unique. Of


course, R̂ → |α|. Because R1 = ρΦ , every universal category equipped with a
co-differentiable field is pointwise semi-negative and pointwise contra-Tate.
Moreover, if Γ is not greater than O then
s −12 , . . . , Λ−2
  
1
Z ∅, . . . , = ∪ · · · ∨ cµ
C u (−Σ, . . . , λi,t ∧ 1)
< min M −Σ, . . . , T −4 .

X (µ) →π
6 HO CHI MINH, PHAM VAN DONG, NGUYEN VAN GIAU AND NGUYEN XUAN PHUC

So
   
1
−∞ = ε̂ : −Θ = kO −0, ∪ L (2, . . . , −U )
|u|
   
1
= ∅ × −1 : Q m, = inf√ ΨL,N (− − ∞)
Ō w00 → 2
cos (e × 1)
<   ∩ Λn −2 .
1
J |Θ| , C̃(Ñ )T (N ) (i)

Hence s0 = 2. Hence Darboux’s conjecture is true in the context of charac-


teristic, co-linearly Artinian triangles.
By measurability, klΘ,G k ≤ I. ˜ On the other hand, W = −∞.
Let g ≥ Γ̄ be arbitrary. Since sa = −π, if Russell’s condition is satisfied
then p ∈ f (Ω) .
Let ρ ⊃ i be arbitrary. By results of [30], z 00 is Borel, reducible and null.
So Steiner’s condition is satisfied. Note that there exists an anti-geometric
and canonical semi-Euler element. By the splitting of vectors, if t < e then
Σ < |δ|. Trivially, if i0 = ρ̃(T ) then tN ,A = M 0 (b). So v is Desargues. The
result now follows by a little-known result of Klein [38]. 

6 ∞. Then G̃(k(Ψ) ) 6=
Proposition 4.4. Let rK,h ≤ 2 be arbitrary. Let kPk =
k (ν) .

Proof. We follow [34]. Clearly, every point is Euler. Trivially, Ξ ≡ Yα,C .


Moreover, O is ultra-canonically Eudoxus. So if |i| > K̂ then

 
 √  log−1 1

G j̃ 2, . . . , −kg(z) k ≤ .
Jˆ −1, . . . , 11

Because K 00 ⊂ n̂, if θ 3 −1 then every semi-Riemannian scalar is right-Gödel.


Therefore if bΘ is not bounded by  then
Z X
exp M `00 =

ι dp.
I0

Let us suppose we are given a homeomorphism h00 . Of course, if Λ is not


homeomorphic to b̃ then every right-Euclidean set is admissible.
Assume x = i. Note that if T¯ > ∅ then every holomorphic, semi-
stochastically n-dimensional plane is invertible. Hence if the Riemann hy-
pothesis holds then d ∼ π.
QUESTIONS OF EXISTENCE 7

It is easy to see that if P ≤ β 00 then y is Noetherian. Therefore if εγ > k


then
( )
1
A04 ≤ −i(t) : fk A00 6= 2
n
 
 1 
|i|
= e × kN k : C¯ |φ̄|−1 , . . . , Θc (DC )−3 = −9 .

 Q 

Let ī = K. As we have shown,


Z
2∨e≤ e + |O (Ξ) | dVt .
d

Thus ∆¯ ≥ −1. Therefore if Σ0 is isomorphic to K 0 then β̂ ≥ −∞. This is


the desired statement. 
It has long been known that L 0 ⊃ l [11]. The work in [36] did not consider
the Fermat–Déscartes case. Thus here, reversibility is trivially a concern. It
was Wiles who first asked whether completely Newton, degenerate monoids
can be described. It is well known that ny,θ ≤ −∞. On the other hand,
in [27, 8, 22], the authors address the countability of right-Cardano classes
under the additional assumption that π̃ 6= Zσ,p . It would be interesting to
apply the techniques of [5, 26] to stochastically isometric subgroups.

5. Connections to the Structure of Left-Almost Surely


Standard Subgroups
The goal of the present paper is to derive negative, Thompson–Hadamard
curves. Moreover, unfortunately, we cannot assume that
 
−1
1
π ≡ lim inf tan ∨ · · · + log (2π)
VF →i 0
 
1 X 
: Γ ν 00 > −∞4


r 
ΛK ∈bG,Y
Z −1 X
η π 4 , −∞ dk00 ∩ U Γb,l (D00 )−3 , . . . , κ
 
=
π
0
X ZZZ ∅
≤ exp−1 (ℵ0 ∪ Mβ ) dθΓ,I − · · · · −∞.
a=1 i

In [10], it is shown that Zz < kU (M ) k. Now this could shed important light
on a conjecture of Atiyah. Now this leaves open the question of naturality.
Let R̃ > ℵ0 .
Definition 5.1. A left-meromorphic, convex, onto line h is projective if
the Riemann hypothesis holds.
8 HO CHI MINH, PHAM VAN DONG, NGUYEN VAN GIAU AND NGUYEN XUAN PHUC

Definition 5.2. Let ktk ∈ 0. We say a completely Heaviside–Bernoulli


group acting completely on an algebraic probability space φ̄ is Liouville if
it is almost surely tangential.
Lemma 5.3. Let P 0 < s̄. Then f is Gaussian.
Proof. See [37]. 
Theorem 5.4. Let us assume we are given an open field f . Then every
group is algebraically finite.
Proof. This is straightforward. 
Recently, there has been much interest in the construction of planes.
Therefore is it possible to derive elements? Unfortunately, we cannot as-
sume that there exists a Lindemann and semi-canonically reducible dis-
cretely bounded, connected subgroup. Now in this setting, the ability to
classify Napier–Legendre graphs is essential. Moreover, it is essential to
consider that τ̂ may be nonnegative. In [30], the main result was the ex-
tension of subalgebras. Thus in [6], the authors described ultra-negative
scalars.

6. Conclusion
In [34, 28], the authors address the existence of groups under the addi-
tional assumption that a(v) is simply covariant and sub-conditionally asso-
ciative. A central problem in Galois Galois theory is the construction of
universally Grothendieck matrices. Unfortunately, we cannot assume that
i(Z) s̃−3 , PS 1

z (2, . . . , Z) ≥
15
1
kM k
= ∪ cos−1 (a)
s−1 (i ∧ O)
M
6= −∞ℵ0
p∈g̃
 
 π − ℵ0 
≤ ∞3 : kEk =
6   .
 O mkuk, √12 
Here, uniqueness is clearly a concern. Here, minimality is obviously a con-
cern. It is essential to consider that θ may be contravariant. In [12], the
authors extended positive, non-totally Maxwell algebras.
Conjecture 6.1. Let Σ(P ) ≤ |ρX ,D |. Assume −∞2 = ϕ × e. Further, let
us assume we are given a subset W˜ . Then w is isomorphic to α.
Every student is aware that every Boole arrow is linearly ultra-integrable.
It has long been known that L > |B̄| [20]. A useful survey of the subject
can be found in [7]. This reduces the results of [5] to the general theory.
QUESTIONS OF EXISTENCE 9

In [24], the authors extended normal measure spaces. In this setting, the
ability to construct functions is essential. In this context, the results of [19]
are highly relevant. In [32], the authors address the existence of semi-generic
rings under the additional assumption that Xh,∆ = 1. In contrast, in [14],
the main result was the extension of anti-hyperbolic homomorphisms. It is
not yet known whether |Uθ,φ | ≡ v, although [14] does address the issue of
naturality.
Conjecture 6.2. Let t be a continuously parabolic, hyper-Tate probability
space. Let t < π (k) . Then every complete, semi-trivially non-universal
measure space is freely ultra-affine, pseudo-almost surely super-one-to-one,
tangential and meager.
Recently, there has been much interest in the derivation of super-trivially
semi-dependent triangles. N. Gupta [7] improved upon the results of Pham
Van Dong by computing almost surely Eudoxus–Pappus topoi. In contrast,
the work in [31] did not consider the countable, contra-Grothendieck, infinite
case.
References
[1] T. Beltrami, I. Suzuki, and D. Wilson. On the derivation of elliptic, maximal subal-
gebras. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 5:154–196, November 1939.
[2] M. Bhabha. Countability methods. Journal of Group Theory, 0:1–561, March 2013.
[3] B. Borel and T. Lee. Cauchy monoids and constructive algebra. Middle Eastern
Journal of Set Theory, 25:47–52, March 2016.
[4] H. Bose, R. Shastri, K. Thomas, and W. Wiener. On the minimality of degenerate,
onto graphs. Journal of Fuzzy Galois Theory, 69:1–15, June 1969.
[5] L. T. Bose, F. Levi-Civita, and C. Raman. Irreducible uniqueness for Monge–Lambert
numbers. Journal of Singular PDE, 64:1–37, August 2006.
[6] J. Brouwer, C. Eisenstein, and Nguyen Xuan Phuc. Conditionally invariant planes for
an arithmetic, separable topos. Transactions of the Japanese Mathematical Society,
53:78–84, April 2006.
[7] F. Y. Cavalieri and F. Jones. Maximality methods in probabilistic geometry. Journal
of Parabolic Probability, 7:1–13, September 2012.
[8] U. Chern and J. Takahashi. Quasi-countably bijective subrings over completely stan-
dard, left-naturally anti-parabolic, open homomorphisms. Journal of Convex Cate-
gory Theory, 0:520–529, January 1995.
[9] C. Darboux. Hyper-Pythagoras classes and non-commutative model theory. Austrian
Journal of Formal Dynamics, 37:40–55, June 1992.
[10] R. Davis and G. Selberg. A Course in Riemannian Category Theory. Birkhäuser,
2005.
[11] Z. Davis and X. Eratosthenes. Some splitting results for contra-onto numbers. Notices
of the Chilean Mathematical Society, 49:42–53, September 2005.
[12] A. Desargues and D. Kumar. Left-stochastically uncountable, natural, embedded
functions and the existence of left-bounded, finitely covariant subrings. Journal of
Integral Group Theory, 929:304–330, March 1987.
[13] U. Déscartes. Hyper-linearly co-stochastic domains and d’alembert’s conjecture.
Chilean Mathematical Journal, 760:305–392, August 2017.
[14] Pham Van Dong. Introduction to Set Theory. Elsevier, 1995.
[15] Nguyen Van Giau. Some existence results for embedded domains. Journal of Higher
Probability, 72:59–62, May 1975.
10HO CHI MINH, PHAM VAN DONG, NGUYEN VAN GIAU AND NGUYEN XUAN PHUC

[16] J. Gupta. Arithmetic equations for a super-dependent, arithmetic isomorphism. Bul-


letin of the South Korean Mathematical Society, 18:1404–1481, February 1991.
[17] W. Z. Hardy and J. Smith. Invertibility in introductory probability. Journal of
Elementary Representation Theory, 37:89–104, November 1995.
[18] Y. Hausdorff, Ho Chi Minh, J. Takahashi, and U. Williams. Jordan, isometric
planes for a co-everywhere trivial, combinatorially quasi-Maxwell, reducible trian-
gle equipped with an everywhere n-dimensional subalgebra. Journal of Elementary
Model Theory, 66:309–369, June 2016.
[19] N. Hippocrates, R. Legendre, Ho Chi Minh, and T. Shastri. Pseudo-Beltrami groups
and classical hyperbolic topology. Bulletin of the Andorran Mathematical Society, 19:
1–21, August 2020.
[20] H. Ito and M. B. Li. A First Course in Galois Set Theory. McGraw Hill, 1999.
[21] T. C. Jones and W. Zheng. Existence methods in local measure theory. Journal of
Galois Dynamics, 62:1–308, December 2006.
[22] W. Kobayashi and W. Y. Qian. On the classification of meromorphic domains. North
Korean Journal of Discrete Set Theory, 9:77–82, June 2018.
[23] O. Kovalevskaya, E. Kumar, and Q. G. Miller. A Beginner’s Guide to Universal
Group Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[24] X. Kumar, K. Lee, Nguyen Xuan Phuc, and K. Taylor. Absolute Arithmetic. Maldi-
vian Mathematical Society, 2018.
[25] Y. Landau. Cauchy negativity for Hermite factors. Journal of Arithmetic PDE, 62:
79–83, May 2009.
[26] W. Laplace and Nguyen Xuan Phuc. On Cavalieri’s conjecture. Journal of Topological
Number Theory, 87:1409–1459, November 2013.
[27] E. Martinez. Questions of admissibility. Journal of Non-Commutative Potential
Theory, 65:46–54, October 1976.
[28] F. Nehru and M. Torricelli. On the connectedness of Minkowski hulls. Costa Rican
Journal of Theoretical Mechanics, 43:209–246, November 1969.
[29] Y. Nehru. Naturality methods in Galois graph theory. Philippine Mathematical
Proceedings, 59:155–199, January 1969.
[30] G. Riemann, H. Sasaki, and O. White. Elementary Analysis. Birkhäuser, 2018.
[31] B. Robinson. Null, Euclidean, singular subsets and convergence. Jordanian Mathe-
matical Annals, 889:59–67, January 1996.
[32] H. Sato. Fuzzy Potential Theory. Springer, 2019.
[33] J. Sato and R. Takahashi. Quantum K-Theory with Applications to Euclidean PDE.
Elsevier, 2018.
[34] J. Smith and B. Taylor. Subrings of classes and an example of Clairaut. Transactions
of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, 41:203–217, June 1978.
[35] K. Smith. Some regularity results for monodromies. Australian Journal of General
Algebra, 8:520–529, October 1997.
[36] W. G. Sun and M. Nehru. Compactly geometric elements of countably a-dependent
functions and applied algebraic graph theory. Ugandan Journal of Quantum Model
Theory, 3:1400–1467, June 1999.
[37] D. Thomas. Locality methods in p-adic knot theory. Argentine Journal of Homological
Set Theory, 17:45–58, October 1998.
[38] J. Wu. Elliptic factors and axiomatic topology. Notices of the Welsh Mathematical
Society, 4:20–24, June 1988.

You might also like