HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

REF NO: A (IPS-20 SQM) REF NO: A (IPS-10 SQM)

REF NO: A (IPS-15 SQM) REF NO: B (CRACK F- 10RM)

1|Page
PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

REF NO: B (IPS-5 SQM) REF NO: B (IPS-5 SQM) PLASTER

– 10 SQM)

REF NO: B ( PLASTER – 3 SQM) REF NO: B ( PLASTER- 5 SQM)

REF NO: C (PLASTER- 4 SQM) REF NO: C (PLASTER- 5 SQM)

POLYMER-5 SQM
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

REF NO: D (PLASTER- 10SQM) REF NO: D

EPOXY GROUT- 10KG CRACK FILLING- 10RM

REF NO: E ( NOT DO) REF NO: E ( NOT DO)

7|Page
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

REF NO: E ( NOT DO) REF NO: F (IPS- 70 SQM)

8|Page
 HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

INTERNAL AREA
The floor was covered with false ceiling, furniture and cladding. So, the structural members were hidden,
and it was not possible to inspect above the false ceiling/cladding. However, at many locations inspection
was done by removing openable false ceiling panels.
BLOCK NO: D1
 No major distress was observed on the structural members in the internal areas of the building.
BLOCK NO : D1
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Crack in lintel beam was

1. observed.
Location : Level 4

POLYMER- 5 SQM
PLASTER – 5 SQM

Due to water seepage, crack

and debonded portion of
2. staircase waist slab was
observed.
Location : Level 4

EPOXY – 20 KG
PLASTERING- 10 SQM

8|Page
 BLOCK NO : D1
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain marks

were observed in the junction
3.
of beam/slab.
Location : Level 4

EPOXY-10 KG
PLASTER- 3 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete, reinforcements
4. were found exposed and
corroded in the slab soffit.
Location : Level 3

POLYMER- 5SQM
 BLOCK NO : D1
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cover

concrete, reinforcements
were found exposed and
5.
corroded in the slab soffit.
Location : Terrace level,
Staircase Headroom

POLYMER- 10 SQM
PLASTER- 10 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete, debonding loose
patch work in the slab soffit
6.
was observed.
Location : Terrace level,
Staircase Headroom

POLYMER – 5 SQM
PLASTER – 5 SQM
 BLOCK NO : D1
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain marks

7. were observed on the surface
of Piping shafts.

EPOXY- 20 KG
PLASTER- 10 SQM

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
8. surface near the window
areas.
Location : First floor level,

EPOXY – 30 KG
POLYMER- 10 KG
PLASTER- 5 SQM5
BLOCK NO: D2
 No major distress was observed on the structural members in the internal areas of the building.
BLOCK NO : D2
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the shaft
9.
area.
Location : Level 4

EPOXY – 25 KG
PLASTER- 5 SQM

Due to water seepage and

inadequate cover concrete,
10. reinforcement was found
exposed and corroded.
Location : Level 4

POLYMER- 10 SQM
PLASTER – 10 SQM
 BLOCK NO : D2
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
11. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 4

EPOXY – 30 KG

Water seepage stain marks

were observed on the surface
12.
of Piping shafts.
Location : Level 3

EPOXY- 15 KG
 BLOCK NO : D2
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain marks

were observed on the surface
13.
of Piping shafts.
Location : Level 2

EPOXY – 20 KG

Water seepage stain marks

were observed on the
14.
surface.
Location : Level 1

EPOXY – 15 KG
 BLOCK NO : D2
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cover

concrete, reinforcements
15. were found exposed and
corroded in the slab soffit.
Location : Level 1
POLYMER- 10 SQM
PLASTER – 10 SQM

Water seepage stain

marks were observed on
16.
the wall surface.
Location : Ground Level

EPOXY- 30 KG
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

BLOCK NO: D3
 No major distress was observed on the structural members in the internal areas of the building.
BLOCK NO : D3
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
17. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 4

EPOXY- 15 KG

Due to inadequate provision

of cover concrete, post
18. tension tendons was found
exposed.
Location : Level 4

(NOT DO)

Crack in wall above the door

19. was observed.
Location : Level 4

CRACK FILLING- 5 RM

16 | P a g e
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

BLOCK NO : D3
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
20. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 4

EPOXY- 15 KG

Water seepage stain marks

were observed on the rain
21. water shaft and beam
surface.
Location : Level 3

EPOXY – 25 KG
PLASTER- 5 SQM

17 | P a g e
 BLOCK NO : D3
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Cracks were observed on the

22. staircase waist slab soffit.
Location : Level 2
POLYMER – 5 SQM
PLASTER -5 SQM

Water seepage stain

marks were observed on
23.
the wall surface.
Location : Level 1
PLASTER – 5SQM
EPOXY- 15 KG
 BLOCK NO : D3
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain

marks were observed on
24.
the wall surface.
Location : Level 1
EPOXY- 15 KG

BLOCK NO: D4
 No major distress was observed on the structural members in the internal areas of the building.
BLOCK NO : D4
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Separation cracks were

observed on the junction of
25. beam bottom and masonry
wall surface.
Location : Level 4
PLASTER- 5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM
 BLOCK NO : D4
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
26. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 4
EPOXY – 10 KG

Crack in staircase waist slab

27. soffit was observed.
Location : Level 1

PLASTER- 5 SQM
POLYMER – 5 SQM
 BLOCK NO : D4
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
28. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 3

EPOXY- 5 KG
PLASTER- 5 SQM

Separation cracks were

observed on the junction of
29. beam bottom and masonry
wall surface.
Location : Level 3

PLASTER- 5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM
 BLOCK NO : D4
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
30. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 2

PLATER – 5 SQM

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
31. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 2

PLASTER- 5
EPOXY- 10 KG
 BLOCK NO : D4
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Structural steel members

anchored extremely near to
32.
the PT tendon location.
Location : Level 1

NOT DO

Due to inadequate provision

of cover concrete, post
33. tension tendons was found
exposed.
Location : Level 1

POLYMER- 1 SQM
 BLOCK NO : D4
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate provision

of cover concrete, post
34. tension tendons was found
exposed.
Location : Level 1

POLYMER- 1 SQM

Due to inadequate provision

of cover concrete,
35. reinforcement was found
exposed.
Location : Level 1

POLYMER- 1 SQM

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
36. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Ground floor Level
EPOXY- 10 KG
BLOCK NO: D5
BLOCK NO : D5
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Crack in masonry wall were

37. observed.
Location : Level 4

PLATER – 5 SQM

Water seepage stain marks

and peeling of paint was
38. observed on the masonry
wall surface.
Location : Level 4
PLASTER – 5 SQM

Crack in masonry wall were

39. observed.
Location : Level 3
PLASTER- 5 SQM
 BLOCK NO : D5
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Crack in staircase slab soffit

and water seepage stain
40.
marks were observed.
Location : Level 3

EPOXY -10 KG
PLASTER- 5 SQM

Crack in masonry wall were

41. observed.
Location : Level 2
PLASTER- 5 SQM
 BLOCK NO : D5
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain marks

were observed from the
42.
window surface.
Location : Level 2

PLASTER- 2 SQM

Crack in masonry wall were

43. observed.
Location : Ground Floor Level
PLASTER- 2 SQM
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

BLOCK NO: B1
 No major distress was observed on the structural members in the internal areas of the building.
BLOCK NO : B1
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
44. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 2

EPOXY- 10 KG

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
45. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 2

PLASTER- 3 SQM
EPOXY- 5 KG

28 | P a g e
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

BLOCK NO: B2
 No major distress was observed on the structural members in the internal areas of the building.
BLOCK NO : B1
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
46. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 4
EPOXY- 5 KG
PLASTER- 2 SQM

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
46. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 4

PLASTER – 3 SQM
EPOXY- 10 KG

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
47. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 4

PLASTRE- 2SQM

29 | P a g e
 BLOCK NO : B1
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Crack in wall was observed.

48.
Location : Level 4
PLASTER-3 SQM

Separation Crack in wall and

staircase slab soffit was
48.
observed.
Location : Level 4
PLASTER- 1SQM
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Crack in wall was observed.

49.
Location : Level 4

PLASTER- 5 SQM

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
50. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 3

PLASTER- 5 SQM
EPOXY- 15 KG

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
50. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 3

EPOXY- 10 KG
PLASTER- 3 SQM

31 | P a g e
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

32 | P a g e
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain

marks were observed on
51.
the wall surface.
Location : Level 3

PLASTER – 3 SQM
EPOXY- 5 KG

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
52. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 3

EPOXY- 10 KG

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
53. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 3
EPOXY- 5 KG
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
54. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 2

EPOXY- 5 KG

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
54. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 2

EPOXY- 10 KG
 Water Seepage stain marks
were observed on the wall
55. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 2

EPOXY- 10 KG
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
55. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 2

EPOXY- 10 KG

Crack in wall surface was

56. observed.
Location : Level 2

PLASTER- 10 SQM

Crack in wall surface was

57. observed.
Location : Level 2
PLASTER- 5 SQM

34 | P a g e
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Crack in wall surface was

58. observed.
Location : Level 1

PLASTER- 5 SQM

Water Seepage stain marks

were observed on the wall
59. surface near the window
areas.
Location : Level 1

PLASTER- 3 SQM
EPOXY – 15 KG
UPPER BASEMENT:

REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Inadequate cover concrete

60. was observed.
Location : Upper Basement

POLYMER- 10SQM
PLASTER-10 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
61.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement
POLYMER- 3 SQM
PLASTER-3 SQM

Crack in beam surface was

62. observed.
Location : Upper Basement

POLYMER- 3 SQM
PLASTER-3 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
63.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

POLYMER- 3 SQM
PLASTER-3 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
64.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

POLYMER- 10 SQM
PLASTER-10 SQM

Water seepage stain marks

were observed in the junction
64.
of beam/slab.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 25 KG
PLASTER- 5 SQM
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain marks

were observed in the slab
65.
soffit.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER- 3 SQM
EPOXY- 20 KG

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
65.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

POLYMER- 5 SQM
PLASTER-5 SQM

Water seepage stain marks

were observed in the slab
66.
sunk.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 10KG
PLASTER-3 SQM

38 | P a g e
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
67.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

POLYMER- 5 SQM
PLASTER-5 SQM
EPOXY- 15KG

Due to inadequate cover

concrete, reinforcements
68.
were observed exposed.
Location : Upper Basement

POLYMER- 3 SQM
PLASTER-3 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete, reinforcements
68.
were observed exposed.
Location : Upper Basement

POLYMER- 1 SQM
PLASTER-1 SQM

39 | P a g e
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain marks

were observed in the junction
69.
of beam/slab.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 10 KG
PLASTER-2 SQM
POLYMER- 2 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete, reinforcements
70. were observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-1 SQM
POLYMER- 1 SQM

Water seepage stain marks

were observed on the column
from the junction of
beam/slab.
 Due to inadequate cover
71. concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 20 KG
PLASTER-10 SQM
POLYMER- 10 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
observed exposed and
72. corroded.
Water seepage stain marks
were observed in the junction
of beam/slab and slab soffit.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 15 KG
PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM

Crack in beam bottom was

70. observed.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-2 SQM
POLYMER- 2 SQM
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage was in the

slab soffit through hairline
73.
cracks.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 20 KG

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
74.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 10 KG
PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM

Active water seepage was

75. observed on the slab soffit.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 10 KG

42 | P a g e
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Active water seepage was in

the slab soffit through
75.
hairline cracks.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 20 KG

Crack in beam bottom was

76. observed.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM
 Active water seepage was
77. observed on the slab soffit.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 25 KG
PLASTER-10 SQM
POLYMER- 10 SQM
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Active water seepage was in

the slab soffit through
77.
hairline cracks.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 10 KG
POLYMER- 5 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
77.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 10 KG
PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM

44 | P a g e
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

Water seepage was observed

78. from the service pipe lines.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 25 KG

45 | P a g e
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to water seepage from

the service pipe lines, distress
79. was observed on the beam
surface.
Location : Upper Basement

NOT DO

Anchor fastener was drilled in

the post tension tendons
80.
zone.
Location : Upper Basement

NOT DO

Anchor fastener was drilled in

the post tension tendons
80.
zone.
Location : Upper Basement

NOT DO
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cut out,

reinforcement was found
81.
exposed.
Location : Upper Basement

MICRO- 25 KG

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
82.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 30 KG
PLASTER-15 SQM
POLYMER- 15 SQM

Due to Improper Cut out,

reinforcement were found
83.
exposed and corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

MICRO- 500KG
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
84.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
85.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-3 SQM
POLYMER- 3 SQM
 Due to Improper Cut out,
reinforcement were found
85.
exposed and corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-2 SQM
POLYMER- 2 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
86.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-2 SQM
POLYMER- 2 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
87.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-7 SQM
POLYMER- 7 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
87.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-10 SQM
POLYMER- 10 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
88.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
89.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM
 Separation cracks were
89. observed on the wall surface.
Location : Upper Basement

CRACK FILLING- 10 RM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
90.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
91.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Upper Basement

PLASTER-1 SQM
POLYMER- 1 SQM

Cracks in the bottom of

92. column was observed.
Location : Upper Basement

MICRO- 100 KG
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Active water seepage was

observed on the column
93.
surface.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 20 KG

Active water seepage was

observed on the column
94.
surface.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 20 KG
PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Active water seepage was

observed on the slab soffit
95.
surface.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 20 KG
PLASTER- 10 SQM

Active water seepage was

observed in the junction of
96.
slab soffit/ beam surface.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 5 KG
PLASTER-1 SQM
POLYMER- 1 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Active water seepage was

observed in the junction of
96.
slab soffit/ beam surface.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 15 KG
PLASTER-2 SQM

Water seepage was observed

in the junction of slab soffit/
97.
beam surface.
Location : Upper Basement

EPOXY- 10 KG
LOWER BASEMENT:

REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain marks

were observed in the junction
98. of retaining wall and Beam
surface.
Location : Lower Basement

EPOXY- 10 KG

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
98.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Lower Basement

PLASTER-1 SQM
POLYMER- 1 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain marks

were observed in the junction
of retaining wall and Beam
99.
surface through service
pipelines.
Location : Lower Basement

EPOXY- 10 KG
PLASTER-2 SQM
POLYMER- 2 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
99.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Lower Basement

PLASTER-2 SQM
POLYMER- 2 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
100.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Lower Basement

PLASTER-7 SQM
POLYMER- 7 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
100.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Lower Basement

PLASTER-2 SQM
POLYMER- 2 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain and

grouting nozzles were
101.
observed on the raft area.
Location : Lower Basement

EPOXY- 15 KG

Anchor fastener was drilled in

the post tension tendons
102.
zone.
Location : Lower Basement

NOT DO
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Water seepage stain marks

were observed in the junction
of beam/slab. Also,
103.
reinforcement of bottom
beam was observed.
Location : Lower Basement

NOT DO

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
104.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Lower Basement

PLASTER-2 SQM
POLYMER- 2 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Gutter was made to avoid

105. water seepage stain marks.
Location : Lower Basement

NOT DO

Active water seepage was

observed in the junction of
106.
slab soffit/ beam surface.
Location : Lower Basement

EPOXY- 10 KG
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cut out,

reinforcement was found
107.
exposed. (Ref No: 81)
Location : Lower Basement

MICRO- 100 KG

Water seepage was observed

through the hairline cracks.
Also at some locations,
due to inadequate cover
108. concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Lower Basement

EPOXY- 10 KG
PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM
 Major cracks were observed
109. on the slab soffit areas.
Location : Lower Basement

POLYMER- 5 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to inadequate cover

concrete, hollow spots were
110.
observed.
Location : Lower Basement

PLASTER-7 SQM
POLYMER- 7 SQM

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
111.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Lower Basement

PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM

Crack in beam and water

seepage stain marks were
112.
observed.
Location : Lower Basement

PLASTER-5 SQM
POLYMER- 5 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to improper cutout was

created on the PT tendon
113.
location.
Location : Lower Basement

NOT DO

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcements were
114.
observed exposed and
corroded.
Location : Lower Basement

EPOXY- 10 KG
PLASTER-3 SQM
POLYMER- 3 SQM
 Water seepage stain marks
were observed on the
115.
retaining wall.
Location : Lower Basement

EPOXY- 15 KG
PLASTER-5 SQM
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to improper cutout was

created on the PT tendon
116.
location.
Location : Lower Basement

NOT DO

Due to inadequate cover

concrete and water seepage,
reinforcement was observed
117.
exposed and corroded near
PT tendon location.
Location : Lower Basement

PLASTER-2 SQM
POLYMER- 2 SQM

Cracks were observed on the

118. slab soffit was observed.
Location : Lower Basement

CRACK FILLING- 20RM

EXTERNAL AREA:
1. Water seepage was observed from the joints of glass façade and the junction of curved roof. Due to
water seepage, corrosion was observed on the insert plate and circular structural members. (Ref no:
119)
2. In the building internal area, water seepage was observed from the window and glass façade areas.
3. At various locations, cracks were observed on the plaster surface near window areas. (Ref no: 120)
4. At many locations, separation cracks were observed in the junction of column/ beam/slab and Masonry
nonstructural walls. (Ref no: 121)

REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to water seepage,

corrosion was observed on
119.
the façade pipe sections.

NOT DO

Due to water seepage,

corrosion was observed on
119.
the façade pipe sections.

NOT DO
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to water seepage,

corrosion was observed on
119.
the façade pipe sections.

NOT DO

Cracks in external plaster

119. near windows were
observed.

NOT DO
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to water seepage,

corrosion was observed on
119.
the façade pipe sections.

NOT DO

Cracks in external plaster

119. near windows were
observed.

NOT DO
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Settlement was observed on

120. the Footpath adjoining façade
walls.

NOT DO

Due to water seepage,

corrosion was observed on
120.
the façade pipe sections.

NOT DO
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Cracks in external plaster

120. near windows were
observed.

NOT DO

Due to water seepage,

corrosion was observed on
120.
the façade pipe sections.

NOT DO
REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Cracks in external plaster

120. near windows were
observed.

NOT DO

Cracks in external plaster

120. near windows were
observed.

NOT DO
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, ANDHERI STRUCTURAL DUE DILIGENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

REF.NO DESCRIPTION PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Due to water seepage,

corrosion was observed on
121.
the façade pipe sections

NOT DO.

Due to water seepage,

corrosion was observed on
121.
the façade pipe sections.

NOT DO

Cracks in external plaster

121. near windows were
observed.

NOT DO

70 | P a g e