PVTA vs. CIR Case Digest - G.R. No L-32052 - JULY 25, 1975 - Legal Assassins

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

8/20/2021 PVTA vs. CIR Case Digest - G.R.

No L-32052 - JULY 25, 1975 - Legal Assassins

Friday, August 20, 2021 Latest:Gonzales vs. Hechanova

Legal Assassins
Law Materials Collection

Formerly www.legalassassins.blogspot.com

 AUDIO CODALS  AUDIO LECTURES  CASE DIGESTS PRIVACY POLICY  


CONTACT US ABOUT US

SEARCH HERE
Case Digest   Constitution   Political Law  

PVTA vs. CIR Search

 June 13, 2020



legalassassins  0 Comments
 case digest,

constitution, political law 

      
Get it fresh

PHILIPPINE VIRGINIA TOBACCO ADMINISTRATION, petitioner,


Your email address
vs.

COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, et al., respondents.


Sign up
G.R. No L-32052

JULY 25, 1975

FACTS:
Recent Posts
Private respondents filed with the CIR a petition, alleging their
Aglipay vs. Ruiz
employment relationship, the overtime services in excess of the
regular eight hours a day rendered by them, and the failure to pay In Re: Garcia
them overtime compensation in accordance with Commonwealth Gonzales vs. Hechanova
Act No. 444. Their prayer was for the differential between the
Limjoco vs. Estate of Fragante
amount actually paid to them and the amount allegedly due them.
Petitioner Philippine Virginia Tobacco Administration denied the Moy Ya Lim Yao vs.
allegations. The then Presiding Judge Arsenio T. Martinez of Commissoner of Immigration

respondent Court sustained the claims of private respondents for


https://legalassassins.com/pvta-vs-cir/ 1/5
8/20/2021 PVTA vs. CIR Case Digest - G.R. No L-32052 - JULY 25, 1975 - Legal Assassins

overtime services from December 23, 1963 up to the date the Categories
decision was rendered on March 21, 1970, and directing petitioner
to pay the same, minus what it had already paid. Petitioner claims Audio Codals
that the matter is beyond the jurisdiction of the CIR as it is
Audio Lectures
exercising governmental functions and that it is exempt from the
operation of C.A. 444, invoking the doctrine announced in the Case Digest

leading Agricultural Credit and Cooperative Financing Civil Law


Administration decision, and the distinction between constituent
Civil Procedure
and ministrant functions of governments as set forth in Bacani v.
Commercial Law
National Coconut Corporation.

Constitution

Corporation Code
ISSUE:
Corporation Law
WON the traditional classification of function of government as
Criminal Law
ministrant and constituent applicable in the case at bar.

Criminal Procedure

Evidence
HELD:
Insurance Law
No. The irrelevance of such a distinction considering the needs of
Judicial Ethics
the times was clearly pointed out by the present Chief Justice.
Under this traditional classification, such constituent functions are Labor Law

exercised by the State as attributes of sovereignty, and not merely Labor Relations
to promote the welfare, progress and prosperity of the people –
Labor Standards
these latter functions being ministrant, the exercise of which is
Legal Ethics
optional on the part of the government.”
Negotiable Instruments
Nonetheless, as he explained so persuasively: “The growing
Persons and Family Relations
complexities of modern society, however, have rendered this
traditional classification of the functions of government quite Political Law
unrealistic, not to say obsolete. The areas which used to be left to Property
private enterprise and initiative and which the government was
Remedial Law
called upon to enter optionally, and only ‘because it was better
equipped to administer for the public welfare than is any private Rules of Court

individual or group of individuals,’ continue to lose their well- Special Proceedings


defined boundaries and to be absorbed within activities that the
Taxation Law
government must undertake in its sovereign capacity if it is to meet
Wills and Succession
the increasing social challenges of the times. Here as almost
everywhere else, the tendency is undoubtedly towards a greater
socialization of economic forces. Here of course this development
Archives
was envisioned, indeed adopted as a national policy, by the
Constitution itself in its declaration of principle concerning the
July 2020
promotion of social justice.”
June 2020

https://legalassassins.com/pvta-vs-cir/ 2/5
8/20/2021 PVTA vs. CIR Case Digest - G.R. No L-32052 - JULY 25, 1975 - Legal Assassins

Thus was laid to rest the doctrine in Bacani v. National Coconut June 2018
Corporation, based on the Wilsonian classification of the tasks
July 2017
incumbent on government into constituent and ministrant in
accordance with the laissez faire principle. June 2017

WHEREFORE, the appealed Order of March 21, 1970 and the


Resolution of respondent Court, denying a motion for Recent Comments
reconsideration are hereby affirmed.
Love on Audio Lectures

(Labor Law)


Unknown on Audio Lectures
(Taxation Law)

jhong2xgeli on Audio
👋HELLO!
Lectures (Taxation Law)
You can help law students and barristas by Unknown on Audio Codal
contributing to our case digests pool. Please (Political Law)

upload your case digests or other relevant randielou on Audio Codal


(Civil Law)
materials HERE.

CALENDAR OF
ACTIVITIES

For attribution or removal, contact us. August 2021

     
M T W T F

 

2 3 4 5 6

9 10 11 12 13
Related

16 17 18 19 20
DAR vs. NLRC PNB vs. Pabalan Manila Prince Hotel
vs. GSIS 23 24 25 26 27
DEPARTMENT OF PHILIPPINE
30 31  
AGRICULTURE, Petitio NATIONAL MANILA PRINCE
ner, vs THE BANK, petitioner,vs.H HOTEL petitioner,vs.G
NATIONAL LABOR ON. JUDGE JAVIER OVERNMENT SERVICE « Jul
 
 
RELATIONS PABALAN, Judge of INSURANCE SYSTEM,
MANILA HOTEL
Log in

Log in

← BACANI vs. NACOCO US vs. Ah Chong → Entries feed

Comments feed

https://legalassassins.com/pvta-vs-cir/ 3/5
8/20/2021 PVTA vs. CIR Case Digest - G.R. No L-32052 - JULY 25, 1975 - Legal Assassins

WordPress.org
What's on your mind? Type it 👇😃
For attribution or removal,
contact us.

About Us Contact Us ICYMI

Email

We are Law Students compiling law


materials for our fellow law students.

Metro Manila

Metro Cebu

Metro Davao

Philippines

https://legalassassins.com/pvta-vs-cir/ 4/5
8/20/2021 PVTA vs. CIR Case Digest - G.R. No L-32052 - JULY 25, 1975 - Legal Assassins

Copyright © 2021 Legal Assassins. All rights reserved.

Theme: ColorMag by ThemeGrill. Powered by WordPress.

https://legalassassins.com/pvta-vs-cir/ 5/5

You might also like