Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Extrapair Paternity and Nest Parasitism in Two Sympatric Quail
Extrapair Paternity and Nest Parasitism in Two Sympatric Quail
811–820
DOI: 10.1642/AUK-16-162.1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
ABSTRACT
We conducted a comparative study of 2 closely related and sympatric species, Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus)
and Scaled Quail (Callipepla squamata), to explore the drivers of interspecific variation in alternative reproductive
strategies. Specifically, we used parentage analyses to determine rates of extrapair paternity and intraspecific brood
parasitism for each species, and evaluated possible mechanisms for explaining variation in these rates between the 2
species. During 2013–2014, we genotyped hatched (n ¼ 388 for Northern Bobwhite and n ¼ 214 for Scaled Quail) and
unhatched (n ¼ 32 for Northern Bobwhite and n ¼ 9 for Scaled Quail) eggshells from 34 Northern Bobwhite and 22
Scaled Quail nests in western Oklahoma, USA. Extrapair paternity occurred in 85% of Northern Bobwhite nests and 9%
of Scaled Quail nests. The number of sires for each nest was greater in Northern Bobwhite nests (x̄ ¼ 2.29 6 0.14 SE
sires per nest) than in Scaled Quail nests (x̄ ¼ 1.09 6 0.06 sires per nest). Intraspecific brood parasitism rates varied
considerably between Northern Bobwhite (21%) and Scaled Quail (0%). Northern Bobwhites also parasitized Scaled
Quail nests. Variation in extrapair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism rates between the Northern Bobwhite
and Scaled Quail appeared to be related to differences in their life history strategies (r-selected vs. K-selected strategy)
as well as differences in breeding population densities.
Keywords: Callipepla squamata, Colinus virginianus, extrapair paternity, intraspecific nest parasitism, Northern
Bobwhite, reproductive strategies, Scaled Quail
egg samples were genotyped at 12 loci, while all adult simultaneously assign sibling relationships and parentage
Scaled Quail feather samples were genotyped at 11 loci. of offspring while accommodating genotyping error (Jones
Five percent of samples were randomly selected and and Wang 2010). Using program COLONY, individuals
blindly regenotyped to estimate the genotyping error rate within clutches were assigned to distinct genetic groupings
with program PEDANT 1.0 (Johnson and Haydon 2007). (full sibling, half-sibling, or unrelated). The ‘‘polygamous’’
One primer for each microsatellite locus was labeled option was selected for both males and females. Each
with 1 of 3 fluorescent tags (HEX, 6-FAM, and NED) and clutch was entered as a distinct group along with the
run either individually or multiplexed in a group of 2 or 3. genotype of the incubating adult. The genotype of the
The working concentration for all primer stock solutions putative mate was also included when available (n ¼ 3).
was 10 lM. Individual Polymerase Chain Reactions (PCR) The full likelihood option with ‘‘high’’ likelihood precision
were conducted in 15 lL reactions consisting of 0.5 lL was chosen along with a ‘‘long’’ length of run. Allelic
forward and reverse primers, 9.0 lL True Allele PCR dropout and genotyping error rates were conservatively set
TABLE 1. Number of samples, number of alleles, expected TABLE 2. Number of samples, number of alleles, expected
heterozygosity (He), observed heterozygosity (Ho), and polymor- heterozygosity (He), observed heterozygosity (Ho), and polymor-
phic information content (PIC) for 10 microsatellite loci used to phic information content (PIC) for 12 microsatellite loci used to
genotype Northern Bobwhites from western Oklahoma, USA. genotype Scaled Quail from western Oklahoma, USA.
No. of No. of No. of No. of
Locus samples alleles He Ho PIC Locus samples alleles He Ho PIC
Quail 3 87 24 0.929 0.851 0.919 C023 39 12 0.808 0.744 0.781
Quail 44 89 5 0.442 0.449 0.403 A014 35 7 0.774 0.600 0.730
Quail 13 89 20 0.893 0.820 0.878 A110 40 3 0.598 0.700 0.509
Quail 30 87 16 0.892 0.874 0.877 C015 39 7 0.678 0.718 0.645
Quail 22 87 12 0.889 0.908 0.873 C009 40 12 0.884 0.875 0.860
Quail 23 86 15 0.889 0.884 0.873 A114 38 12 0.829 0.895 0.801
CV-P1F3 86 12 0.827 0.837 0.805 A104 39 11 0.816 0.744 0.782
CV-PCF5 86 15 0.898 0.837 0.884 C022 39 8 0.788 0.795 0.747
TABLE 3. Extrapair paternity in Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail clutches in western Oklahoma, USA.
Mean no. of
No. of No. of offspring genotyped samples Mean no. of Clutches with
Species clutches genotyped per clutch sires per clutch .1 sire
TABLE 4. Occurrence of intraspecific and interspecific nest parasitism (NP) in Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail nests in western
Oklahoma, USA.
No. of nests parasitized No. of offspring resulting from NP
No. of offspring
Species No. of nests Intraspecific Interspecific genotyped Intraspecific Interspecific
Northern Bobwhite 34 7 (21%) 0 408 12 (3%) 0
a
Scaled Quail 22 0 2 (9%) 235 0 12 (9%)
a
Interspecific nest parasitism was from Northern Bobwhites parasitizing Scaled Quail nests.
effective against cuckoldry because putative mates will our study site, Northern Bobwhites are considerably more
likely encounter fewer other males. abundant than Scaled Quail; 2.19 6 0.13 males per point
Given that both Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail and 3.17 6 0.23 males per point were recorded for
facilitated the occurrence of IBP. The mean clutch size for ary factors (Arnold and Owens 2002). However, we also
Northern Bobwhites during our study was 12 eggs, and recognize the difficulty of disentangling the role of a
clutch size ranged from 6 to 18 eggs, which is typical for species’ evolutionary history from the role of contemporary
Northern Bobwhites. A closer examination of clutch sizes factors in explaining differences in EPP and IBP, and
showed that 71% of IBP occurred in clutches that therefore have not made inferences beyond the scope of
contained .12 eggs and no IBP occurred in clutches that our study.
contained ,11 eggs. Moreover, the 2 Scaled Quail nests
that were parasitized by Northern Bobwhites contained 18
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
and 21 eggs. Although we did not determine nest densities
or the spatial distribution of nests, the high breeding We thank J. Groendyke for providing the Groendyke graduate
population density of Northern Bobwhites also suggests fellowship. We also thank M. Judkins, E. Thacker, W. Storer, C.
that nest densities were high. Crisswell, S. Wayment, M. Richins, K. Schultz, and all of our
great technicians for their assistance with this project. Any use
NY, USA. https://birdsna.org/Species-Account/bna/species/ Hosner, P. A., E. L. Braun, and R. T. Kimball (2015). Land
norbob connectivity changes and global cooling shaped the
Bridges, A. S., M. J. Peterson, N. J. Silvy, F. E. Smeins, and X. B. Wu colonization history and diversification of New World quail
(2001). Differential influence of weather on regional quail (Aves: Galliformes: Odontophoridae). Journal of Biogeogra-
abundance in Texas. The Journal of Wildlife Management 65: phy 42:1883–1895.
10–18. Johnsgard, P. A. (1973). Grouse and Quails of North America.
Burger, L. W., M. R. Ryan, T. V. Dailey, and E. W. Kurzejeski (1995). University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Reproductive strategies, success, and mating systems of Johnsgard, P. A. (1988). The Quails, Partridges, and Francolins of
Northern Bobwhite in Missouri. The Journal of Wildlife the World. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
Management 59:417–426. Johnson, P. C. D., and D. T. Haydon (2007). Maximum likelihood
Bush, K. L., M. D. Vinsky, C. L. Aldridge, and C. A. Paszkowski estimation of allelic dropout and false allele error rates from
(2005). A comparison of sample types varying in invasiveness microsatellite genotypes in the absence of reference data.
for use in DNA sex determination in an endangered Genetics 175:827–842.
population of Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasia- Jones, O. R., and J. Wang (2010). COLONY: A program for
Sefc, K. M., and S. Koblmüller (2009). Assessing parent numbers Webster, M. S., K. A. Tarvin, E. M. Tuttle, and S. Pruett-Jones
from offspring genotypes: The importance of marker (2007). Promiscuity drives sexual selection in a socially
polymorphism. Journal of Heredity 100:197–205. monogamous bird. Evolution 61:2205–2211.
Sorenson, M. D. (1992). Why is conspecific nest parasitism more Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of ‘Student’s’ problem
frequent in waterfowl than in other birds? Canadian Journal when several different population variances are involved.
Biometrika 34:28–35.
of Zoology 70:1856–1858.
Westneat, D. F., and P. W. Sherman (1997). Density and extra-pair
Stoddard, H. L. (1931). The Bobwhite Quail: Its Habits,
fertilizations in birds: A comparative analysis. Behavioral
Preservation, and Increase. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New Ecology and Sociobiology 41:205–215.
York, NY, USA. Wink, M., and A. Dyrcz (1999). Mating systems in birds: A review
Wahlund, S. (1928). Zusammensetzung von Populationen und of molecular studies. Acta Ornithologica 34:91–109.
Korrelationserscheinungen vom Standpunkt der Vererbung- Yom-Tov, Y. (1980). Intraspecific nest parasitism in birds.
slehre aus betrachtet. Hereditas 11:65–106. Biological Reviews 55:93–108.