Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PIM For NAP From Davis - 2013
PIM For NAP From Davis - 2013
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE
DECEMBER 2013
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Preface
This Programme Implementation Manual (PIM) is an interpretation of the Financing Agreement signed
between the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and the Government of the State
of Eritrea (GoE) to facilitate implementation of the National Agriculture Project (NAP). It is prepared
based on the Financing Agreement, Project Design Report (PDR), IFAD Letter to the Recipient (LTR),
IFAD’s Guidelines on Financial Reporting and Auditing of Projects, IFAD’s Disbursement Manual,
IFAD’s Guidelines for Procurement of Works, Goods, and Consultancy Services, GoE financial
guidelines, regulations and circulars, and experience gained from implementing the Post Crisis Rural
Recovery and Development Programme (PCRRDP), PCRRDP Add-On, and the Catchment and
Landscape Management Project (CLMP). In the event that there is any inconsistency or conflict
between this Manual and the Financing Agreement, the Provisions of the Financing Agreement shall
have precedence.
This PIM is prepared with the objective of providing the implementing agencies, particularly the
National Project Office (NPO) and the Zoba Project Coordinating Offices (ZPCOs) at the Zoba levels
with a guide that would facilitate effective implementation of the NAP. The PIM is presented in two
parts. Part One (and its associated Appendices and Annexes) describes the management and
organizational set up required for Project implementation. It also discusses the procedures and
modalities to be followed when carrying out planning, implementation, management, reporting, and
monitoring and evaluation activities of the Project. It defines the processes to be followed with respect
to Project supervision and environmental screening, mitigation and monitoring. Part Two (and its
associated Appendices and Annexes) of the PIM provides processes and procedures to be followed
on all fiduciary-related aspects during NAP implementation.
The PIM is prepared following the Government’s guideline which requires line ministries and Zoba
administrations to implement development programmes/projects within the existing decentralised
government institutional framework following procedures and modalities that are consistent with the
policies, regulations and directives of the Government. Consequently, the management and
implementation arrangements that are described in this Manual reflect this Government’s approach to
programme/project implementation and management.
Finally, the Manual should be viewed as a dynamic document that needs to be updated whenever
circumstances change to ensure that it remains relevant and responsive to the Project.
6
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Table of Contents
Acronyms
7
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
A. Background
1. Eritrea has a decentralized government with two major levels: (i) the central level, and (ii) the
Zoba (regional) level. Zoba administrations operate at a three further levels: Zoba; Sub-zoba (sub-
regions), and Kebabi (group of 1-5 villages including 400-500 households). Eritrea is divided into: 6
9
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Zobas (Anseba, Debub, Gash Barka, Maekel, Northern Red Sea, and Southern Red Sea); 58 Sub-
zobas; and 701 Kebabis. At central level the national parliament with 150 assembly seats is the
legislative body. At Zoba level an appointed Governor chairs the Zoba council, heads the Zoba
administration and is a member of Executive Council at the central level. A unified service is
maintained with staff at Zoba/Sub-zoba levels operationally/administratively responsible to the Zoba
Governor, and technically to their respective departments in the national line ministries. Kebabi
administration is headed by the Kebabi Administrator.
2. Achieving food security is a primary objective of the GoE and the cornerstone for sustainable
economic growth and poverty alleviation strategy in Eritrea. The realization of this food security
objective of the Government primarily rests on enhancing domestic food production. However,
increasing domestic food production requires addressing the multitude of challenges currently facing
the agricultural sector, including over-dependency on rain-fed agriculture; rapid degradation of land
and loss of soil fertility; small farm size and farm land, and fragmentation and dispersion of plots;
utilization of low level of production and post harvest technologies; inadequate agricultural research
and extension service; low producing breeds, inadequate animal disease surveillance and control,
and shortage of animal feed; inadequate rural infrastructure; low level of integration and management
of production systems; and inadequate financing of the sector. Over the last few years, the
Government has worked with its development partners to implement programmes/projects that aim at
addressing some of the challenges. Some of such interventions include the International Fund for
Agriculture Development (IFAD) supported ones, such as the Post-Crisis Rural Recovery
Development Programme (PCRRDP), the IFAD/European Community supported one – the Post-
Crisis Rural Recovery Development Programme Add-On (PCRRDP Add-On) and the IFAD/Global
Environment Facility (GEF) supported one – the Catchment and Landscape Management Project
(CLMP).
3. However, the challenges are still many and the Government and its development partners
continue to devise ways and means to systematically and sustainably address them. As part of this
continued endeavour, the GoE signed a Grant Agreement with IFAD on 22 nd December 2012 to
finance implementation of the National Agriculture Project (NAP); the Grant Agreement became
effective on the same date. To guide and facilitate implementation of the NAP in line with the
Financing Agreement, the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA), together with the regional administrations of
the six Zobas (Anseba, Debub, Gash Barka, Maekel, Northern Red Sea and Southern Red Sea) have
put in place the necessary institutional setup at the national and Zoba levels. The setup includes
expansion of the existing National Steering Committee (NSC) to include the additional Zobas,
establishment of Zoba Project Coordination Committees (ZPCCs), realigning the existing National
Project Office (NPO) to ensure consistence with the NAP requirements, and establishment of Zoba
Project Coordination Offices (ZPCOs) in those Zobas where they were non-existent. To further
strengthen the Project Coordination Offices, technical experts (subject matter specialists) from the line
departments, divisions and units of the MoA at Headquarters and Zoba offices were assigned with the
aim of providing technical guidance to NAP implementation.
5. This PIM consists of two parts; Part One (and its associated Appendices and Annexes)
describes the management and organizational set up required for Project implementation. It also
discusses the procedures and modalities to be followed when carrying out planning, implementation,
management, reporting, and monitoring and evaluation activities of the Project. It defines the
processes to be followed with respect to Project supervision and environmental screening, mitigation
and monitoring.
10
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
6. Part One is divided into four Sections. The first Section is the introductory part which deals
with background information. The second Section presents the Project framework, including its goal,
development objectives, strategy, components, Project area, target groups and targeting. The third
Section defines the Project planning, implementation, management, reporting, monitoring and
evaluation processes and the organizational structure and implementation arrangements of the
Project. It also deals with the role of Project supervision, namely Project Launch Workshop, Project
Reviews, Project Supervision Missions, and Project Completion Report. The fourth Section describes
environmental screening, mitigation, and monitoring procedures to be followed with respect to sub-
projects and activities to be financed by NA
7. Part Two (and its associated Appendices and Annexes) of the PIM provides processes and
procedures to be followed on all fiduciary-related aspects during NAP implementation.
B. Project Strategy
9. The Project strategy is to employ an integrated development approach to addressing the
identified constraints facing the target beneficiaries. The following are the facets of the approach:
10. National Framework for Smallholder Agricultural Development – NAP seeks to lay the
foundation for the medium to long-term development of smallholder agriculture in order to ensure rural
household and national food security and reduce poverty. This approach is consistent with the IFAD
country programme approach to support the transition from a focus on post-crisis livelihood re-
establishment to structured agricultural development for national food security and alleviation of rural
poverty.
11. Agricultural Water Resource Development – Limited water availability is a major constraint for
agricultural development in Eritrea. With extremely limited perennial surface water (no lakes, one
perennial river) and limited, though underexploited, groundwater, Eritrean agriculture depends mainly
on rainfall and the resultant runoff from the highlands. Rainfall in the highlands serves a variety of
users and agricultural systems (rain-fed, irrigated, rangeland) within each watershed. Adopting a
watershed approach and using watershed characterization and studies of related hydrometry, to
understand the inter-linkages between these systems, is therefore crucial to develop a coherent
strategy for sustainable agricultural production.
12. Sustainable productivity enhancement – Mixed agriculture, including cropping and livestock
production, is practiced by smallholders to improve household food security, as a drought coping
strategy, to maximize utilization of their land resources and to derive benefits from the communal
rangeland. The Project will support and improve this rational approach to resource exploitation.
13. Livestock as priority investment for low income households – Food security, including
nutrition, cannot be effectively addressed without proper attention to livestock. More than 80% of
smallholders own livestock and over 60% of agricultural land is suitable only for livestock. However,
support to livestock should not worsen the degradation of rangeland which is already at a critical
stage, and importantly should seek to enhance food security of the low income households, including
women, with limited access to agricultural land.
14. Technology generation and dissemination – A participatory approach to the development and
dissemination of modern and traditional technologies (including labour-saving technologies) involving
the producers, MOA, Agricultural Divisions of the Zoba administrations and NARI will be piloted by the
Project. When proved successful, it will be adopted as a national strategy for widening access to
appropriate and affordable agricultural technologies and technical support services.
11
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
15. Community Focused Development – Settled communities will be the focus for Project
activities within each watershed. The interventions to be implemented within each watershed will be
tailored to the potential of the natural resource base and the needs of the communities. Local
community institutions and producer organizations (e.g. Water Users Associations (WUAs)) are vital
for sustainable development and will be strengthened and encouraged to participate in all stages of
implementation of Project activities including designing, construction, operation and maintenance of
infrastructures, including irrigation, and soil and water conservation, seed development facilities, and
livestock investments.
18. Target Group – The 65% of the Eritrean rural population (c. 2.6 million individuals) who are
classified as low-income will constitute the wider target group of the Project. The total population of
the 34 Sub-zobas the NAP will initial operate in is estimated at 1.7 million. The NAP is expected to
benefit 81,292 households or approximately 410,000 of these individuals (based on average poor
household size of 5 people). They engage mainly in rain-fed agriculture using poor production
practices; this, together with erratic climatic conditions, is accelerating desertification and further
reducing agricultural productivity. The lowest income groups are represented by smallholders
cultivating only rain-fed crops. They have food deficits even in good years due to low yields resulting
from the low level of technology, late ploughing (because they have no draught animals), small land
holdings and lack of livestock1.
19. The beneficiaries will be selected according to specified criteria, beginning with the selection
of priority watersheds and including minimum targets for WHH participation which should lead to
16,258 WHHs benefiting.
21. Targeting – Targeting mechanisms have been included to ensure that Project benefits reach
the low-income earners. Each Zoba has a database detailing household status, including resettled
households and the Kebabi administration and communities can assist to identify the poor and
vulnerable households. Each Zoba Project Coordination Office includes a sociologist to support
mobilization and organization of the rural communities and identify the primary target groups, in
collaboration with Zoba and Kebabi administrations, community elders, and the National Union of
1
A detailed account of target group characteristics and targeting mechanisms is provided in NAP’s Working Paper 2: Poverty,
Gender, Social Capital and Targeting.
12
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Eritrean Women. Both direct and self-targeting will be applied for small stock, small-scale dairy,
backyard poultry and apiculture activities which are targeted at the lowest income earning groups,
particularly women. Small stock and backyard poultry are exclusively for women and WHHs 2.
22. Pro-poor and gender mainstreaming dimensions of the Project will be stressed during the
Inception Workshop, at Kebabi Development Committees and during mobilisation. Appropriate
training will be provided to staff of implementing agencies to enable them to identify and encourage
participation of target groups. Efforts will be made to engage low-income earning households
particularly women in decision making processes during implementation. Employment of women as
extension officers and para-officers will be promoted and support will be provided to NUEW to provide
technical and business training to women in livestock, agriculture, and agriculture-related enterprises.
Support will also be provided for formation and capacity building of different types of producer
organizations.
D. Project Description
23. NAP has three components and five categories. The project components include: a)
Agricultural Water Resources Development; b) Integrated Agricultural Production; and c) Project
Support Services. The paragraphs that follow give a summary of the components and the constituent
subcomponents.
iv. Capacity building of at least 25 staff at MOA and Zoba administrations in watershed
characterization techniques.
providing technical and management support services. The communities will be expected to
make an in-kind contribution to infrastructure development. These activities will then be out-
scaled from pilot watersheds to other priority watersheds within the Zoba taking into account
lessons learned and experience gained.
25. Given that large investments in irrigation infrastructure, including water capture and storage,
have already been made in many Zobas, an important focus of the NAP investments will be on
capitalising on ‘sunk investments’ by bringing new knowledge and lessons learned to bear on past
investments (by IFAD, GOE and other donors) and improving existing irrigation systems, many of
which have suffered due to weak/inappropriate design or insufficient attention to developing
community capacity for Operation and Maintenance. This is reflected in the above design. It is
expected that the overall balance of investment in new as compared to existing pressurised irrigation
will be 45% new and 55% existing. With regard to spate irrigation, the expected balance is 16% new
and 84% existing. However, these balances may change during implementation depending on the
results of the watershed characterisation studies. Investment in catchment protection will be closely
coordinated with the activities of the CLMP. Successful implementation of Subcomponent 1.3 will
lead to the following outputs:
i. A National Seed System (including National Seed Unit (NSU); Zoba Seed Units
(ZSUs); farmer/private company and Village Based Seed Enterprises (VBSEs))
established and functional;
ii. NARI is strengthened to carry out variety introduction, screening, and maintenance,
and for production of breeder and foundation seeds;
iii. RSD is strengthened to undertake seed quality certification; environmental
assessment/evaluation;
iv. Three seed processing units established and functional; and
v. About 1,945 Mt of certified seed, 19.5 Mt of breeder seed and 195 Mt of foundation
seed produced and used.
15
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
i. Food crop production intensified through the provision of seeds, fertilizers, and
agrochemicals on 4,249 ha of irrigated and 16,760 ha rain-fed land on an annual basis;
ii. Certified/improved seeds made available to at least 22,410 ha small-scale spate
irrigation and 39,036 ha rain-fed, annually;
iii. Technology generation and dissemination system strengthened and extension services
provided to about 160,000 households, annually.
iv. Farmers trained in improved management and production under pressurised irrigation
systems.
With regard to apiculture, support will be provided in the form of providing training to staff of
existing apiculture development centres in Debub, Maekel and Anseba to enable them to: a)
provide training for bee keepers; b) produce and distribute basic colonies for start-off; c) train
artisans to produce improved bee hives; and d) supply production materials – smokers,
protective clothing and simple primary processing equipments. For Animal Health Services,
support will be improved through the provision of vaccines and drugs, enhancement of
community-based services, including the training and provision of health kits to Community
Animal Health Workers and para-veterinarians who will be employed by communities to provide
simple treatments and undertake sales of drugs and vaccines under the supervision of qualified
veterinarian. Support for Animal Feed Production will be provided in order to raise livestock
productivity and to protect the environment by reducing overgrazing and consumption of crop
residues. Building on previous successful experiences in past IFAD projects/programmes,
communal rangeland improvement will be undertaken including promotion of the development
of Voluntary Livestock Exclusion Areas (VLEA) and over-sowing of rangelands. Successful
implementation of Subcomponent 2.3 will lead to the following outputs:
28. The chart below provides a summary of the Project and how the different
components/subcomponents interact to contribute to the Project’s overall goal and development
objective. From the chart, it is evident that NAP is an integrated agricultural development initiative.
Goal: To positively contribute to rural household and national food security and
poverty alleviation
5
A full list of the planned trainings is provided in Working Paper 8 of NAP’s Project Design Report.
17
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
18
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
31. Ministry of Agriculture – The Project will be implemented within the Government’s
decentralized institutional framework and in collaboration with the private sector. The overall
management of the Project will be the responsibility of the Minister of Agriculture. The Planning and
Statistics Division of MOA will have the responsibility for the coordination of Project planning,
including the preparation of the consolidated NAP’s Annual Work-Plan and Budget (AWPB) based on
the respective AWPBs from the MOA, NARI, MLWE and Zobas; production of consolidated 6-monthly
and annual progress reports. It will also conduct impact evaluation and knowledge management,
including production of annual evaluation reports, conducting the annual implementation review
workshops, carrying out special/thematic studies and preparing the Mid-Term Review (MTR) and
Project Completion Report (PCR). The Administration and Finance Division will have responsibility for
planning and coordination of procurement and disbursement; ensure proper accounting and financial
management, including the preparation of six-month and annual financial reports. It will also ensure
consistency of budget with annual work plan, and preparation of 18-month Procurement Plan.
32. Zoba Administrations – The day-to-day implementation and coordination at the Zoba level
will be the responsibility of the respective Zoba Administrations, under the direction of the Governor.
Within each Zoba, the development process is going to be, largely, driven by the local communities
through the Sub-zobas and Kebabi administrations following the GOE’s decentralised participatory
planning system6 whereby Village Development Plans are consolidated into Kebabi plans, which are
then consolidated into Sub-zoba plans, and finally then into Zoba plans. The Sub-zoba Agricultural
Divisions will provide direct supervision of the Kebabi-based technical teams as well as prepare
progress reports following Government guidelines. The same Sub-zoba Agricultural Divisions will
technically backstop Kebabi operations, including training, support to planning including preparation of
Sub-zoba AWPBs. The Kebabi Administration will also play a key role in conflict resolution. Each
Zoba will establish and operate a ZPCO which will have the responsibility for the preparation of a
Zoba-AWPB, the six monthly and annual progress reports, and monitoring activities. Finance,
accounting and local procurement will also be entrusted to the ZPCO.
33. Agricultural Extension Department (AED) of MOA – The AED will provide technical
backstopping to the Zoba Administrations and ensure that Project implementation is aligned with GOE
policy and strategy. It will collaborate with the RSD and MLWE in ensuring that agricultural production
activities are carried out within the environmental guidelines and policies. AED has responsibility for
providing technical specifications of livestock drugs and vaccines to AFD for procurement, the sales,
and management of the related revolving accounts. The marketing unit also operates under AED and
is responsible for agricultural input supply and managing the related revolving accounts. AED has
been strengthened to continue the services. AED will, working in collaboration with NARI and Zoba
6
This is described in detail in section E of NAP’s Working Paper 1.
19
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Seed Units, ensure the effective implementation of the seed programme. It will be responsible for the
implementation of the stock routes.
34. Past endeavours to create a National Seed Enterprise have not yet been successful. NAP is
expected to supplement such endeavours to help put the enterprise in place. Once in place, it is
expected to collaborate with AED and MoA Zoba offices for coordinating the provision of technical
support to farmers (both subsistence and commercial) who will be contracted to undertake seed
production activities. It is also expected to ensure accountability and effective coordination of seed
multiplication activities by establishing its own focal points in each of the participating Zobas.
However, in the interim, AED, in collaboration with the NPO, NARI and the Zobas, will assume
responsibility for coordinating seed multiplication activities. Accordingly, AED will distribute foundation
and/or certified seeds to the Zobas and provide them with technical backstopping. The MoA Zoba
branch offices will in turn assume implementation responsibility, including the selection of farmers to
be contracted for seed multiplication, provision of technical support, monitoring and follow-up,
collection of produced seed, etc. NARI will provide subject matter specialists from AED with technical
support, including training on seed production. RSD, particularly its regional inspectorates, will be
responsible for ensuring that seed multiplication activities are undertaken in line with its guidelines
and standards.
35. Improving agricultural productivity will require putting in place an efficient and sustainable
system of technology generation and dissemination. Although the MOA has in place a good number
of subject matter specialists at the national, Zoba and sub-zoba levels, the intermediate and frontline
extension staff levels have traditionally not fared well. To ensure effective delivery of extension
services, a pilot extension project was designed and undertaken during the PCRRDP implementation.
The pilot was tested in two sub- Zobas in each of Zobas of Debub and Gash Barka (Senafe and
Debarwa in Zoba Debub and Goluj and Laelay Gash in Gash Barka). The pilot involved frontline
extension workers for delivery of information and technology. It is reported that the pilot extension
strategy performed quite well and was found to be effective. However, the pilot is yet to be formally
evaluated so that it can be replicated in other Zobas and sub-Zobas where NAP will be operating.
Under NAP, the pilot will be evaluated to establish what worked well, how it worked, the cost
implications and then develop a mechanism through which the successful approaches can be scaled-
up. This would, essentially, involve setting up a Zoba Committee comprising NARI, the Zoba
Agricultural Division and representatives of farmers, to define production problems to be addressed
through adaptive research and farm trials, and technical extension messages (extension impact
points) to be extended to the farmers. AED will take the lead in coordinating this endeavour.
36. Regulatory Services Department (RSD) of MOA – RSD will provide quality assurance and
certification services for agricultural inputs and outputs including quarantine for imported plant
products. It will ensure necessary training for private and public institutions with regard to policies and
regulations for quality control. It will certify the quality of seeds and agro-chemicals before use. It will
assure proper assessment and evaluation of environmental aspects of key agricultural activities
including ensuring that chemical used as well as their handling meeting Eritrea and international
standards.
37. National Agricultural Research Institute (NARI) – NARI will have direct responsibility for
variety screening, evaluation and maintenance, producing breeder and foundation seeds, and training
of the private sector in the production of foundation seed for an eventual transfer of that responsibility
to them. It will collaborate with Hamelmalo Agricultural College in variety screening, evaluation and
dissemination to assure synergy.
38. Ministry of Land, Water and Environment (MLWE) – The MLWE will provide support to the
Project to ensure that its activities are carried out in line with the environmental guidelines and
procedures of the country. It will approve all plans for irrigation development before commencement of
construction; supervise and monitor construction and operations to ensure compliance with
environmental guidelines. The Ministry will participate in the planning and development of watershed
and catchment areas. It will also take the lead in policy and legal reviews in relation to land-tenure,
water-use and management, and general environmental management issues. The MLWE’s Zoba
units will have the responsibility for the implementation of the meteorology and hydrometry systems
and ensuring that Project activities are within the environmental guidelines.
20
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
39. The Forestry and Wildlife Authority (FWA) will provide technical backstopping to Zoba
Branches in terms of forest nursery development and management; community based forest
plantation/woodlots enhancement; natural forest/woodland conservation and development by giving
emphasis to the establishment and management of enclosures; ensure proper utilization of wood and
non wood forest/wooded land products which are pertinent to the program components. It will also
undertake effective measures on protection and movement of forest and wildlife products and bi-
products in accordance with the Forestry and Wildlife conservation and development Proclamation
No. 155/2006.
40. National Steering Committee (NSC) – The current NSC was established to serve past
IFAD-supported Programmes/Projects. The same NSC will remain in place for the NAP with the
addition of the Governors of the four new Zobas. Its functions will remain the same and will include: (i)
oversight of Project implementation; (ii) ensuring that the Project is implemented within the national
policy and strategy framework; (iii) approval of the AWPB; and (iv) assistance in resolving conflicts
and/or implementation bottlenecks. It will review and approve key reports before forwarding them to
IFAD. The NSC will meet, at least, every six months or as often as conditions may warrant.
41. National Technical Committee (NTC) – The NTC is formed at the national level by drawing
experts from the relevant technical disciplines to provide technical support to the Project. The
committee reviews the consolidated AWPBs submitted by the line departments of the MoA and Zoba
Project Coordination Offices. It also reviews and appraises project proposals submitted by subject
matter specialists from the line departments of the Ministry and MoA Zoba offices to ensure that they
are technically and financially feasible and consistent with the Project Design Report and the AWPB.
The National Project Coordinator chairs the NTC. The other members of the NTC are seed expert,
dairy development expert, poultry and beekeeping expert, irrigation development expert, regulatory
services expert, researcher, and Planning Officer.
42. Zoba Project Coordination Committees (ZPCCs) – The ZPCCs operate at the Zoba level
and are already established and functional in Zoba Debub and Zoba Gash Barka. Similar committees
will be established in the four new Zobas with the same composition and functions. Their basic
functions are to provide oversight of operation at Zoba level and to review and endorse the Zoba
AWPBs and key reports before forwarding to PSD for consolidation. The ZPCCs will meet on a
quarterly basis or as often as may be required.
43. Technical Partners in Implementation – The EC is providing technical collaboration and co-
financing under the PCRRDP–Add-on. It also has a national programme for food security which has
similar objectives to as the NAP, and is being implemented under the same institutional framework as
other IFAD assisted programmes. IFAD and the EC are also providing support in ICT to the MOA.
GEF is providing assistance in the Catchment and Landscape Management Project which
compliments PCRRDP and is coherent with the integrated watershed management approach of the
NAP. Consultations on harmonization of policies, resource use and technical approaches which have
been established between IFAD and EC will continue under NAP to ensure synergy and better impact
on the development of the agricultural sector for enhanced food security and rural poverty alleviation.
ICARDA has provided significant technical inputs in the design of NAP, and consultations have been
established with relevant CGIAR centres (ICRISAT, CIMMYT, CIP and ICBA) for technical support
during implementation. All IFAD programmes/projects have established close working relations with
the MLWE to ensure that the environmental and natural resource management aspects are
addressed in a coordinated way.
44. Link with Complementary Projects – It is the policy of GOE that all agricultural sector
projects/programmes are overseen by the MOA and directly implemented by the Zoba
administrations. This arrangement facilitates linkage of complementary agricultural sector
projects/programmes. The NAP will be implemented following this institutional arrangement. IFAD is
also a member of the Food Security Cluster in Eritrea which interacts with GOE on policies and other
issues related to food security and poverty alleviation. This has facilitated harmonization by
development partners of policies and strategies for food security and smallholder agricultural
development. IFAD has collaborated with ICARDA, ICRISAT and FAO who have supported seed
production activities in Eritrea for over 5 years and the National Seed System under the proposed
NAP will build on their experiences, and make use of facilities already established.
21
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
45. Planning and Budgeting Process – The development process under NAP will be
community driven. Therefore, the Project will use a participatory planning process to ensure that
activities included in the AWPBs are responsive to the needs of the target communities. In order for
this to function, the communities must identify and prioritise their problems and define development
actions to address them. Each Kebabi administration has a Planning and Implementation Committee
(PIC) to review and consolidate the Village Development Plans into a Kebabi plan. The PIC is headed
by the Kebabi Administrator, assisted by the local Zoba assembly members. PIC would receive
technical support from the Sub-Zoba line agencies. The Kebabi plans will be submitted to the Sub-
Zoba Planning Committee (SPC) for review, approval and incorporation into Sub-Zoba development
plan. SPC is composed of the Sub-Zoba development Administrator as the chairperson, heads of
Sub-Zoba departments, local Zoba assembly members, National Union of Eritrean Women (NUEW),
Kebabi Administrators, and civil society organisations. Once endorsed, the AWPBs will then be
forwarded by the Sub-Zoba administration to the Zoba administration office for consolidation. The
consolidated Zoba AWPBs would be sent to the NPO for review and consolidation into the overall
NAP AWPB. The Project has provided financing for workshops and training as may be required and
for capacity enhancement through training and payment of community development agents to be
appointed by the council. An allowance has also been made for the strengthening of the Kebabi
technical teams. The AWPB should be presented in the recommended format (attached as Annex I).
The NPO should provide all implementing agencies with the recommended format for the AWPB to
ensure a common approach to preparing and presenting the respective work plans; this would make
the process of aggregation a lot easier.
46. In order to stick to the expected deadlines with regard to the approval process of the draft
AWPB and ensure that the draft is approved in time for the planned activities to be implemented in a
timely fashion, the schedule in the table below should be followed.
22
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
48. The purpose of M&E is to keep track of day-to-day duties on a continuous basis in order to
identify as early as possible any shortcomings regarding delivery of inputs, execution of different
activities or production of outputs so as to undertake timely corrective measures . Thus, M&E is
primarily an instrument for improving Project management. The process should generate relevant
information for the stakeholders that include the Government, donors, executing agency, Project
management. Using the information, the process should establish whether resources are used
according to plan, if Project objectives are being achieved or whether these objectives need adjusting
as a corrective measure. Information which indicates inadequate operation, shortfall in performance
and discrepancy between target objectives or expected impact and those being achieved, provides a
basis for decision-making by Project management. The decisions would be aimed at addressing the
identified deficiencies to bring the Project back on track. As a management tool, the priority task of an
M&E system must be the provision of information that contributes to effective decision making.
49. Responsibility and Coordination – The NPO has the overall responsibility for Monitoring
and Evaluation of the Project. The Planning and Statistics Division of the MOA has experience from
coordinating other IFAD-supported Programmes/Projects and this experience will be used to put in
place an effective M&E system for NAP implementation. Direct responsibility for M&E will be assigned
to the M&E Officers at the NPO and ZPCOs. A detailed M&E arrangement will be drawn up with
specific assignment of responsibilities between the NPO and ZPCOs, the specification of the schedule
of activities and the format of reporting. The design of M&E will be in line with the guidelines contained
in the Results and Impact Management System (RIMS) of IFAD. The NPO has the responsibility for
carrying out the Mid-Term Review (MTR) no later than the first quarter of Programme Year 4. The
NPCO will also produce the Programme Completion Report which shall be submitted not later than six
months after completion.
50. M&E Processes – Following below is presentation of the key steps that will need to be
followed to provide an adequate M&E function to NAP implementation.
52. Baseline Assessment – At the start of Project implementation, it will be required to obtain a
set of benchmark measures on Project interventions. A baseline survey will be conducted to provide
information about verifiable indicators as a benchmark for assessing impact of the project
interventions in line with the Project's goal, objectives and activities as contained in the logical
framework. Such benchmarks will be developed as a reference point when organising repeat surveys
and/or when conducting Project Mid-term Review and Project Completion Evaluation. It is desirable
that the survey is undertaken before the onset of Project interventions.
53. Performance Monitoring – Each year, Project activities will be undertaken within the
framework of an approved AWPB. In the participating Sub-Zobas, and starting with the AWPB for the
second Project Year, planning will be participatory and done at the Kebabi and Sub-Zoba levels. The
annual work planning will be used in order to: a) define Project activities and outputs; b)
accommodate community level beneficiary group needs and priorities; c) review and, where needed,
adjust the approaches, based on the implementation experience; and d) set realistic targets for each
year.
23
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
55. Annual Reviews – Participatory Annual Performance Reviews will be organised at the
various levels and will be an essential participatory M&E activity. Resources will be provided for these
review workshops at Sub-Zoba and Kebabi levels. The reviews will involve all key stakeholders that
include communities’/beneficiaries’ representatives, implementing partners and service providers.
During the reviews, performance data on each Project Component, Sub-Component and activity will
be assessed against targets, and conclusions reached regarding successful interventions, constraints
and suggestions for adjustments for the following year. The involvement of beneficiary communities
in evaluating the services they receive in not only an empowerment tool but also a means of ensuring
ownership of the development process. This contributes to sustainability.
57. Impact Assessment – Two specific occasions are designated for undertaking impact
assessments. First of all, half-way through Project implementation, a beneficiary assessment will be
undertaken to document Project outcomes, and will also guide preparation of the Mid-Term Review.
The MoA and IFAD will jointly carry out a review of Project implementation no later than the first
quarter of the fourth Project Year based on the terms of reference prepared by the MoA and approved
by IFAD. Among other things, the Mid-Term Review will consider the achievement of the Programme
objectives and the constraints thereon, and recommend such reorientation as may be required to
achieve such objectives and remove such constraints. It will also evaluate the appropriateness of
Project approaches, strategies, institutional arrangements, etc. The MoA will prepare a report
describing Project achievements two months before the Mid-term review is carried out.
58. The Project MTR and completion impact assessments will be undertaken by independent
firm(s) recruited under an open competitive bidding process. The scope for continuation, adaptation,
and replication of Project activities will be highlighted by these reports as appropriate. Before
recruiting the Consultants, the M&E Officer will prepare an overview of all relevant information that
could be used in the preparation of the impact assessments. The MoA will submit to IFAD the Project
Completion Report (PCR) no later than six months after the Project Completion Date. The Project
Completion Report will evaluate and detail the Project impact on the target group. The PCR will
include both technical and financial reports.
59. Supervision and Implementation Support – IFAD will directly supervise Project
implementation, including the provision of implementation support as may be needed. It will also
administer the grant. Supervision Missions will be undertaken at least twice a year or more frequently
as conditions may warrant during the course of Project implementation. The aim of the Supervision
Missions is to: a) review and evaluate the progress of implementation of the Project against the
AWPB and Appraisal targets; and b) assess the effectiveness of the implementation arrangements
put in place for the Project. At the end of each Supervision Mission, the Team will prepare a report
(Aide Memoire) to present its major findings and recommendations focusing on the achievements and
constraints of the Project for discussion with the MoA and other relevant partners. To facilitate the
work of the Supervision Missions, the MoA will prepare implementation progress reports describing
Project achievements and constraints prior to the start of the Supervision Missions.
24
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
60. Progress Reports – The provision of informative progress reports is a formal requirement;
the Financing Agreement stipulates this requirement. The six-monthly and annual reports should be
prepared and submitted to IFAD and all collaborating institutions in prescribed formats. The main
functions of progress reports are:
61. The primary importance of preparing progress reports is that it enables implementing
agencies and project management to record data, review progress. Reflect on outputs, evaluate
performance, and discover weaknesses that can be improved and successes that can be up-scaled.
It is this process of reflection and analysis that matters; if done properly, the process would lead to
better plans and implementation in the future.
62. Progress reports are the most tangible result of monitoring and, usually, a distinction is made
between quarterly, six-monthly and annual reports. Monthly reports are not recommended although
some implementing agencies may use monthly reports as part of their internal management systems.
For IFAD projects, however, a month is generally too short to record significant change and prepare a
consolidated report. Thus, six-monthly and annual reports will be produced. Each of the participating
Zobas will prepare and submit six-monthly and annual progress reports to the NPO. The NPO will
review and consolidate them, highlight successes and constraints and produce recommendations to
address the identified constraints. The consolidated reports will be approved by the NSC before
submission to IFAD. The reports will be submitted to IFAD no later than one month after the close of
each reporting period. The Guidelines on Progress Report writing are attached as Annex II.
63. IFAD’s Results and Impact Management System (RIMS) – IFAD is committed towards
achieving Millennium Development Goals and recognizes the need to better document the impact of
its operations on these Goals. To this end, the February 2003 IFAD Governing Council called for the
establishment of “...a comprehensive system for measuring and reporting on the results and impact of
IFAD-supported country programmes. Approved by the December 2003 IFAD Executive Board, the
mechanism was originally called the ‘Framework for Results and Impact Management’ but has since
changed names to the ‘Results and Impact Management System’ (RIMS). The RIMS framework
consists of a number of standardised indicators and NAP will be expected to report on those RIMS
indicators that are of direct relevance to its overall objectives. The relevant RIMS indicators would be
selected by the NPO in consultation with the Zobas. Once selected, the list should be submitted to
IFAD for review and/or comments.
a. Level 1 Indicators are measurements of results at the ‘Output’ level; they are taken from the
annual targets;
b. Level 2 Indicators – These are ‘Outcome’ indicators and are a measure of improved
functionality and/or behavioural changes. They are mostly more qualitative than those of
Level one indicators and take relatively longer to be realized. They correspond to the
objective level of the Project Logical Framework;
c. Level 3 Indicators – These are ‘Impact’ indicators; they measure the effects of the Level 1
and Level 2 indicators and correspond to the goal level of the Project Logical Framework;
d. Anchor indicators – These are a short list of critical ‘Impact’ indictors that are based on
objective, comparable data and linked to the Millennium Development Goals. They are
compulsory. There are two Anchor Indicators which are measured at the beginning, mid-term
and completion of the Project. They include:
The number of households with improvement in household assets;
25
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
65. Details concerning RIMS and guidelines on its application are contained in a document called
‘RIMS – First and Second Level Results Handbook’. This is attached as Annex XIII.
26. The MoLWE has an overall responsibility for environmental screening, evaluation, mitigation,
and monitoring activities to ensure that projects and activities do not have adverse effect on the
environment.
26
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
32. All Category A activities/sub-projects will be subjected to full EIA before environmental
clearance can be granted. Completion of EIA will be borne by the NAP with the coordination of the
DoE. The major steps of the EIA study are: (i) Scoping to produce Terms of Reference to define the
focus and the limits of the main EIA study; (ii) EIA study and draft environmental management plan;
(iii) EIA adequacy review; (iv) stakeholder consultation to get written comment on EIA report and draft
plan; and (v) Impact Review Committee which is an expert group, chaired by the DoE, formed to
review the reports produced by an EIA study and make recommendation on environmental clearance
(for detailed discussion of the EIA steps, please refer the NEAPG of the DoE of the MoLWE).
D. Environmental Monitoring
34. The DoE is responsible for the overall monitoring of the effectiveness of the environmental
assessment process in Eritrea. This includes monitoring of approved projects in order to ensure that
negative environmental impacts arising from project implementation do not exceed allowable limits. In
recognition of the full integration of environmental management into the emerging Eritrean economy,
day-to-day monitoring of environmental performance will be the responsibility of the MoA. The results
of the monitoring will be sent to the DoE or its representative at agreed intervals. The DoE or any
other relevant Government agency (MoA) has the right to undertake inspection of a project site in
order to confirm adherence to monitoring procedures at any time.
Introduction
1. Financial Management is a matter of public concern and the systems, tools and internal
controls included in this manual should be used with:
27
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Diligence: The Financial Management players in NAP should be thorough and should
pursue the key controls that are necessary to protect NAP funds.
Efficiency: The NAP finance teams should ensure that their work is carried out
economically by optimising the use of available tools, such as the laccie accounting
package.
Objectivity: The NAP finance teams should have a professional attitude and be seen
to be free of any interest which might reasonably be regarded, whatever its actual effect
might be, as being incompatible with their integrity and objectivity. They have been entrusted
with public funds and should apply the tools, systems and controls in this manual to
safeguard NAP funds.
2. The key players in the NAP financial management have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure
that proceeds from the IFAD grant are used exclusively for intended purposes. Poor financial
management in the implementation of NAP could result in failure to achieve its intended impacts. Both
IFAD and GOE have a shared fiduciary interest during the implementation of NAP as illustrated below:
3. IFAD will undertake thorough supervision missions that will include a review of all fiduciary
aspects, will undertake in-depth review of audit reports, may commission own audits/ reviews, etc
while the GOE has a number of systems and structures to achieve its mandate.
4. In summary the financial management section of the PIM aims to provide users with tools and
guidance on the entire NAP Financial Management cycle that involves the following typical stages:
The NAP financial Management cycle- the critical points at which input of finance officers will
is required:
28
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Budgeting and
Budget control
29
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
9. The IFAD Executive Board approved the “Revision to the IFAD Guidelines on Project Audit with
immediate effect in Dec 2011”. The manual illustrates, without reducing the Published guidelines, the
critical steps/Calendar that NAP should follow to ensure full compliancy
Anticorruption policy
10. The management of the project funds shall be sufficiently rigorous to safeguard against Fraud
and Corruption. Fraud and corruption include, but are not limited to:
corrupt practice - offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting, directly or indirectly, anything of value
to influence improperly the actions of another party
Fraudulent practice - any act or omission, including a misrepresentation, that knowingly or
recklessly misleads, or attempts to mislead, a party to obtain a financial or other benefit or to
avoid an obligation
Collusive practice - an arrangement between two or more parties designed to achieve an
improper purpose, including influencing improperly the actions of another party
Coercive practice - impairing or harming, or threatening to impair or harm, directly or
indirectly, any party or the property of the party to influence improperly the actions of a party.
11. IFAD applies a zero-tolerance policy towards fraudulent, corrupt, collusive or coercive actions in
projects financed through its grants and grants. The IFAD anticorruption policy is available on IFAD
website at (www.ifad.org/governance/anticorruption/index.htm). The IFAD website also provides
instructions on how to report any alleged wrongdoing to the Office of Audit and Oversight
(http://www.ifad.org/governance/anticorruption/how.htm).
12. It is the National Project Coordinator’s responsibility to make sure that all NAP Office staff
including the financial department are aware of IFAD’s and the MoA anticorruption policy and whistle
blowing procedures.
13. The International Fund for Agricultural development (IFAD) provided a grant to the State of
Eritrea on the terms and conditions set forth in the Financing Agreement, the amount of SDR
11 400 000 (approximately USD 17.2 million) to implement the National Agriculture Project (NAP)
(here after referred to as “the Project”). The Project consists of the following components as outlined
in schedule 1 of the financing agreement: a) Agricultural Water Resources Development;
b) Integrated Agricultural Production; and c) Project Support Services.
14. The GoE and IFAD have agreed within the Financing agreement (FA) to allocate the financing
to categories of eligible expenditures shown in the Schedule 2 of the FA. The schedule 2 also
specifies the percentages of such eligible expenditures to be financed by the Financing: 100% net of
tax.
Category IFAD Grant Eligible
(SDR) expenditures (%)
net of Tax
I. Civil Works 3,050,000 100%
II. Vehicles, Motorcycles, Equipment and Materials 1,500,000 100%
III. Agricultural and Livestock Inputs 2,100,000 100%
IV. Technical Assistance, Training Workshops and Studies 2,840,000 100%
V. Recurrent costs- operations and maintenance 770,000 100%
Unallocated 1,140,000
Total 11,400,000
15. In addition to IFAD financing the Project will also receive counterpart financing from the
Government, equivalent to approximately the equivalent of USD 5.4 million. The counterpart financing
will include 1.098 million to cover a portion of civil works, livestock inputs, technical assistance,
trainings, workshops and studies. This will be in addition to an amount equivalent to approximately
30
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
USD 4,302,000 in the form of taxes and duties. The project beneficiaries will also contribute
approximately the equivalent of USD 3.7 million to the project.
Minister of Agriculture
Also chairman of National stee ring
Committee,
Zoba
Governors
Project Accountant-
NAP
Zoba Level NAP
(ZPCO)Financial Controllers
Legend:
Information flow
31
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual – Financial Management Section
32
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual – Financial Management Section
Financial Controller (FC) National Level Project Accountant ZPCO - Project Accountant
Responsible for overall financial Raises vouchers, ensure they are well Raises vouchers, ensure they are well
Administration functions of the supported-making use of the checklist in this supported-making use of the checklist in this
project manual. manual.
In charge of Consolidation of Laccie Keeps & maintains proper financial records Keeps & maintains proper financial records
based returns from the various (chronological filing system). (chronological filing system).
Zobas and National level Updates entries in the Laccie accounting Updates entries in the Laccie accounting
transactions system for National Level Transactions. system for Zoba Level Transactions.
In charge of preparation of Prepares Bank reconciliations Prepares Bank reconciliations
consolidated withdrawal applications Ensures budget control; that no expenditure can Ensures budget control; that no expenditure
to IFAD consolidating from all the be incurred unless it has provision in the AWPB. can be incurred unless it has provision in the
cost centres. Provides SOE reports to enable the Financial AWPB.
Treasury Management ensuring that Controller to consolidate withdrawal applications Provides SOE reports to enable the
the replenishment cycle is not Provides a well reconciled Laccie database for Financial Controller to consolidate
clogged National Level transactions to the Financial withdrawal applications
Ensures compliance by the Zobas Controller to enable the latter undertake Provides a well reconciled Laccie database
and other cost centres of all financial consolidations with other cost centres. for Zoba Level transactions to the Financial
management related aspects Where the Zobas are unable to use the Laccie Controller to enable the latter undertake
Preparation of financial reports as software, the NPO Project Accountant will help consolidations with other cost centres. (At
required by all stakeholders the NPO financial Controller to post the excel the start this may take the form of simple
Prepares financial accounts and based returns from the Zobas into the Laccie excel based cashbooks until the Zobas have
facilitates Audits accounting software. been able to develop capacities to use the
Ensure accurate costing for the Maintains key registers, e.g fixed assets Laccie accounting software)
AWPB etc register, contract monitoring forms, contracts Maintains key registers, e.g fixed assets
register. register, contract monitoring forms, contracts
register
33
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual – Financial Management Section
It is a performance measure, therefore, NAP should set challenging targets but not
unrealistic ones. NAP’s performance will be assessed, among other ratings, by the extent
of AWPB execution.
21. In the planning and budgeting stage, the finance officers are expected to perform the four
functions below:
2. Analyse 3. Support in
1. Avail budget other restricting financial data
responsibility factors such as presentation 4. Develop a
centres status of amount that can and treasury plan
available balances be realistically consolidation in
category-wise and replenished for in the acceptable
component-wise a Year formats
22. Analysis of Restricting Factors: Prior to the start of the planning and budgeting exercise the
NPO FC will obtain from the Accounting system and from IFAD a status of funds balances available
category-wise. From the Laccie accounting system the FC also obtains balances component-wise,
including up to the major activities. The status of funds available should be adjusted by deducting
commitments, WAs in the pipe line and projected expenditure for the remaining part of the current
year. The adjusted information about the status of funds is provided to the budget responsibility
34
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual – Financial Management Section
centres so that they are aware of budget ceilings. It would be poor financial management/ accounting
if the AWPB is cleared when in fact it is not feasible in the context of available balances category-
wise. A working form that can used in Ms Excel to determine the available balance is as given below.
23. The net available balance should also be broken down according to components, sub-
components and major activity headings so that planners are able to determine the relative weights
for each component/ sub-component in the AWPB as illustrated in the table below. It is important to
keep a relative balance between components so that some components do not lag behind.
Working Form to deduce status of available balances Component-wise (ERN)
Component Available Less Less Less Net
As at NAP Commitments WA’s Projected Available
Accounting in Expenses Balance
software Pipe as at the
Line end of the
Fiscal
Year
1 Agriculture Water
Resources Development
35
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual – Financial Management Section
24. A summary of commitments rolled-over from year to year should be included in the new AWPB
so that at any one time there should be one AWPB.
Other budget restricting factors
25. Whereas available balances may set the ceiling of what to include in the AWPB, other
restricting factors that the FC will have to communicate to the budget responsibility centres involved in
the planning process include the realistic amount that can be replenished for from IFAD, the size of
the initial advance.
Consolidating the NAP AWPB
26. In the AWPB there are a number of finance tables that have to be consolidated by the FC,
working closely with the Planning and M & E Officer. While the consolidation of the AWPB into
one document will be led by the Planning and M & E Officer, the finance tables will be a
responsibility of the FC. These tables will include:
36
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual – Financial Management Section
Detailed Activity based annual Work Plans and Budgets for each budget
responsibility centre
Formats for use by Finance Officers
27. The formats for each of the above summary tables is summarised below and more details can
be obtained from the IFAD guidelines for AWPB preparation and progress reporting.
30. Each of the main project components has an approximate budget in the project design or per
GoE priorities as reflected in approved work plans and budgets. Each component pursues its
objective, and jointly the components will contribute to achieving the overall project goal. In this
regard, the balance between the components, in terms of implementing activities, achieving outputs
and using up the associated budget, is important. When expenditure under a certain component falls
far behind the planned expenditure, this should be cause for concern, the reasons should be
investigated and action taken. Financial progress by component will provide the information that is
necessary to detect such an imbalance in expenditure. The information will also be useful to assess
whether budgeting is realistic and to track expenditure over time. As an option, expenditure by
component compared to the project budget can also be presented using graphs.
31. Similar to components, the total budget of the project can be broken down according to types or
categories of expenditure. These categories are not supposed to be overspent; however a
reallocation is possible. The reason is the same as described under components: there is a certain
balance in the project design, between different items and activities on which money will be spent. If
this balance is lost, for example because far more money than expected is spent on vehicles and
allowances and very little is spent Agricultural and Livestock inputs, certain aspects of the NAP will fail
to work as expected. When expenditure under a certain category approaches the limit while other
categories have a much lower level of expenditure, the reasons should be investigated. Financial
progress by category will provide the information that is necessary to detect such situations, which
may lead to reallocation.
32. It is important to track the cumulative disbursement for each financier in relation to the total
amount committed, in order to know how much money the project has left.
37
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual – Financial Management Section
Indicate by
shading when the
Sub- Component planned activity
will take place
Zoba
E.g Sub-
Zoba
Avoid too
Bring out much details. Indicate the
briefly what is Use unit as a designated
it that will be set or kit but actor
produced referenve the
data to the
Composition of
the kit
Indicate the performannce
measure. what is that will
show that the activity has been
done.
38
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Budget Controls
33. Laccie Accounting software is not able to encumber funds at the point of entering into
commitment in order to avoid over committing the project and to ensure budget control. Thus, in
addition to using Laccie Accounting software accounting package, manual Vote books must be
opened and updated to monitor prudent spending at each budget responsibility centre. Before
payment is effected/funds committed, the respective project accountant at the Zoba or cost centre
shall review the activity funding, to see whether the vote has enough funds so as to keep expenditure
within the budget or consult NPO on the need to ask the Steering Committee and IFAD on any likely
negative variance. Accurate completion of the vote book will enable the project to make informed
decisions based on budget performance per budget line and to ensure that transactions incurred have
adequate provisions in the AWPB.
34. The approach to NAP budget control has the following elements
a. Common and consistent budget coding from AWPB preparation, expenditure requisition,
payment and journal vouchers and posting the accounting system(Proactive control)
b. Posting the budget in NAP Accounting software and undertaking budget Vs actual on a
monthly basis (Reactive control)
c. Since Laccie accounting software is likely to provide a reactive control a vote book is
necessary.
35. Every quarter, the Financial Controller should review the costs incurred during this time period.
In case of differences between the planned and actual costs presented in the Annual Budget, the
Financial Controller should identify the reasons for those differences and detail them in the periodic
Financial Reports presented to IFAD. In case of internal problems identified during the costs review,
the Financial Controller should take the necessary steps to eliminate them. Otherwise, the budget for
the next quarters should be readjusted to reflect the difference between actual and planned figures.
38. The NAP chart of accounts is based on the above data filter features as follows:
39
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
When the first digit of the control code is: The respective component is:
1 Component 1: Agricultural Water Resources
Development
2 Component 2: Integrated Agricultural Production
The NAP coding approach to monitor expenditure trends up to individual activity level
40. The subsidiary data filter that Laccie offers is used to track expenditures up to activity level with
each activity linked to one of the above sub-components. Below each sub-component set up in the
control coding, various activities will be established.
41. The subsidiary code facility offers 4 digits and the first digit reserved to identify the sub-
component under which the respective activity falls as follows:
42. The remaining three digits of the subsidiary data capture represent the various NAP
activities and the complete code for activities is below:
40
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
41
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
43. The NAP coding approach to monitoring Expenditure category Wise: This is done based
on the category data filter feature of Laccie with the following being the respective codes:
Code Expenditure category
1 Civil works
2 Vehicles, Motorcycles, Equipment and Materials
3 Agricultural and Livestock Inputs
4 Technical Assistance, Training Workshops and Studies
5 Recurrent costs- operations and maintenance
44. The NAP coding approach to monitoring Expenditure by financing source: This is done
based on the donor data filter feature of Laccie with the following being the respective codes:
Code Financier
1 IFAD grant
2 Government of Eritrea
3 Beneficiaries
45. Whenever a transaction takes place under the Project, it should be recorded and processed
using the Laccie accounting software. The recording of transactions under the Project follows the
Cash basis of accounting with allows for the recognition of cash inflows in the period they are received
and the reporting of expenses in the period those expenditures are paid.
42
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
46. Individual records of transactions are treated as source documents. For the project accounting
purposes, the following source documents are considered:
Purchase orders/ Contracts
Purchase invoices
Service invoices
Consultants/engineers’ reports
47. All transactions occurred should be registered in the accounting software in accordance with
the date of occurrence and under the form of journals. Vouchers should contain sufficient and detailed
information about the date of the transaction, its type, amount and reference to the source document.
All the transactions should be entered on the accounting software using the principle of double entry,
which means that each transaction should be recorded twice, once on the debit side of the transaction
and once on the credit side of the transaction. The accounting software will automatically process
those transactions and post them to the ledger accounts, which are accounts where all transactions of
similar type are recorded. This processing of transactions also allows for the production of timely
reports.
48. Other key aspects discussed later in this section are:
Petty cash management: The accountant will manage and periodically reconcile the petty
cash account. The petty cash account is discussed more in detail later in this manual.
Bank account reconciliations: The accountant will need to perform monthly bank account
reconciliations between the different accounts. The reconciliation is discussed more in detail
later in this manual.
Withdrawal of funds: The accountant will be responsible for preparing withdrawal
applications to be submitted to IFAD. The necessary procedures are explained in later in this
manual and in the IFAD disbursement Handbook.
Financial reporting: The accountant is not only in charge for recording the financial
transactions on a daily basis but also for summing up the expenditures made under each
component and sub-component and for each activity under those and posting the data on
accounting/financial reports on a periodic basis during the reporting periods specified in the
Letter to the GoE and in the Financing Agreement. The accountant will also need to keep
track and report on the availability of project funds in the different accounts (Designated
accounts, project accounts and petty cash) as well as the commitments made by the project
at the respective cost centre.
Fixed asset register: The accountant needs to maintain a fixed asset register recording all
fixed assets but this will be done off the Laccie accounting system. Fixed asset management
is discussed more in detail later in this manual.
Period for which records are to be kept: The accountant needs to file the original records in
an organised way to be maintained by the NPO/LPA/ the respective Zobas for a minimum 10
years after the project completion. Record management is discussed more in detail later in
this manual.
Access Levels: The access to the accounting system should be governed by the privileged
metrics defining the levels of access by different users: (i) active use for inputting/editing of
data; (ii) read-only use; or (iii) no-access. This would allow a separated and controlled access
to the Accounting module (i.e. Journal recording, posting to the General Ledger). Each
accounting transaction records the user’s ID, preventing unauthorized access to the system
and an adequate level of protection against the input of false data or the destruction of the
records. At the same time, the data-sharing nature of the system involves a strict
coordination and active data exchange among its various users (primarily the NPO/ ZPCO). In
this respect the system should ensure the reliability in information storage and fast data
processing.
IX. PROCUREMENT
Caution!
Without proper management of the procurement process, there cannot be good disbursements.
Therefore the smartness and effectiveness with which the procurement process is managed
determines the level of disbursements.
43
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Failure to comply with IFAD and GoE procurement procedures will result in transactions being
declared ineligible for IFAD loans and grants financing.
A. Procurement Cycle
Procurement
Requisition
Filled with
Procurement Clear
Plan and Specs/TOR/ Confirmation of Availability of
Budget 1 SOW 2 funds 3
Review of:
User Specifications/ TOR/SOW
Department Procurement Method
Evaluation Criteria
Potential Supply Market 4
Financial
Controller
Contract and
Performance Programme
Evaluation 15 Coordinator
Award of
Contract 12
Approval of Bidding
Documents 7
Review of
Evaluation
Report and
Seeking
IFAD's No
Objection 11
Receipt
and Advertising
Evaluation of Opening and Invitation
Bids 10 of Bids 9 for Bids 8
49. If the Procurement Process is not well managed, the disbursement levels will be affected.
Before commitments are entered into there cannot be disbursements. Therefore disbursement is
directly dependant on how well the procurement process is managed.
50. The Procurement officers have to think through the draft AWPB with ingenuity to determine the
smartest contract packaging so that the direct payment method can be used to avoid overloading the
special account. In all cases, proper packaging of procurements will enable the programme utilise the
direct payment method, hence reducing pressure on the Special Account.
44
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
53. The Procurement Plan tracking form as per the Procurement Plan illustrated above should be
presented in monthly management meetings to indicate progress to date. The tracking form includes
a Planned and Actual rows for each procurement item. The planned row will have already been filled
during the procurement planning process and approved as such. Each month, the actual dates on
which a procurement stage has been done will be entered into the actual row, so that any spillages
are identified in time and rectified.
54. The force account, being an effective, practical and economical way of delivering some kinds of
works, should only be used when the following conditions are met:
Quantities of work involved cannot be defined in advance;
Works are small and scattered or in remote locations for which qualified construction firms
are unlikely to bid at reasonable prices;
Work is required to be carried out without disrupting ongoing operations;
The risk of unavoidable work interruption is better borne by the Programme than by a
contractor;
There are emergencies needing prompt attention.
55. Where the above conditions do not apply, other procurement methods should be utilised.
56. Where the Programme lacks the necessary organization, resources or experience to deal with
international procurement, it may employ, as its procurement agent, a firm or entity specializing in
handling international procurement. The agent is to follow all the procurement procedures outlined in
the loan agreement on behalf of the programme. The process of acquiring the procurement agent
should meet the principles of efficiency, economy and effectiveness. The Programme should have a
contract with the agent. Where possible, the programme should utilise the direct payment method to
clear obligations due to the procurement agent.
57. Where an item is common to more than one Cost Centre, bulking should be applied at the
National Level. Where there is an item that is specific to a Zoba, then procurement should be done at
Zoba level provided a no objection to procure has been sought from the National Level and thresholds
as set in the Financing Agreement and GoE Procurement Guidelines have been observed. In such a
case, the procurement method will also be approved by at National Level.
58. Committing Funds and procurement management is about being able to manage a process,
ensuring that there are no slippages in each of the above 15 stages. It involves being proactive; and
pre-empting the procurement process using the 18 months procurement plan that is a requirement
before the AWPB is approved.
C. Roles and Responsibilities
User Departments
59. Users should perform the following functions:
(i) Provide their needs as input into the Procurement Plan and Budget
(ii) Fill in requisition forms while providing clear Terms of Reference for services, Bills
of Quantities for Works and Specifications for goods.
(iii) Participate in contract review, award and signing
(iv) Participate in contract monitoring
(v) Participate in contract performance evaluation
Financial Controller
(a) Provide confirmation of availability of funding
(b) Effect payment when the contract has been satisfactorily
performed
45
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Procurement Officers
(i) Review specifications / ToRs/SoW
(ii) Recommend an appropriate procurement method
(iii) Recommend the evaluation criteria
(iv) Identify potential supply market
(v) Prepare bid documents
(vi) Carry out advertising and invitation for bids
(vii) Receive and open bids
Contracts Committee
(i) Approve the procurement method
(ii) Evaluate bids
(iii) Review Evaluation report and seek IFAD’s No Objection
(iv) Award contract
D. Institutional Roles
60. The MOA has a Procurement and Supplies Management Unit (PSMU), which reports to the
Head of Administration and Finance Division. The Unit has two main functions: Procurement, and
Supplies Management. This Unit will take charge of the NAP procurements and offer all the necessary
technical backstopping to Zobas for those procurements that cannot be bulked and centrally procured.
61. In the Zoba, there will be a specific Tender committee for NAP, whose members will be
constituted by the Governor with technical advice of PSMU. Although in Eritrea the procurement limit
for this kind of Tender committee is up to Nakfa one hundred thousand (100,000.00); a specific
exemption for NAP will be obtained in respect thereof, otherwise Programme Implementation may be
slowed down, if all Procurements above Nakfa 100,000 are to be done by the Ministry of Finance.
E. Procurement Methods
62. Goods, works or services are either procured locally or from foreign sources. For this reason,
the procurement is local or foreign procurement. The commonly known procurement methods are the
following:
63. Shopping: This could be local or international in which there are two methods:
Purchase without profroma invoices, which are purchases of small value items that call for
no proforma invoices.
Purchase with proforma invoices for which at least three proforma invoices have are
collected from suppliers, and the supplier offering the lowest price, all other things being
equal, is the winner.
64. Single Source (SS): In a situation where only a single source of supply is known to exist, the
procurement method is called single source procurement. The invitation for bid is sent to this sole
source. It must, however, be noted that unless the source of supply is verified to be the only and only
source, this method of procurement could be a pretext for abuse.
46
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
65. Invitation for Bids (IFB): The term invitation for bids is used for goods and works only. It refers
to the formal invitation for bids from bidders. There are four types of IFBs:
Limited Local Bidding (LLB);
National Competitive Bidding (NCB);
66. LLB refers to bidding where bidders are found within the country and are known to be few in
number. And an invitation for bid is sent to them directly.
67. NCB is a method of procurement in which the required item of procurement is believed to be
available in the country, and the payment is expected to be made in local currency. An invitation for
bid is announced through the country’s mass media.
68. LIB is applied where the bidders - found inside and outside the country - are known to be
limited in number. And an invitation for bid is sent directly to their address.
69. ICB is applied where bidders are many and scattered throughout the world. Invitation for bids
are advertised in internationally well known publications to reach bidders in a two stage, first through a
general procurement notice and second through a specific procurement notice.
70. Request for Proposal (RFP): RFPs apply to the procurement of services, and are issued to
short-listed consultants.
F. Inviting Bidders
71. RFQs are prepared with clear and detailed specifications and floated to known suppliers. The
responding time limits for local purchases are 7 days, and for foreign purchases 15 days.
72. IFBs are prepared and issued to bidders following a formal advertisement, except in the case of
single source bids. The essential features of IFBs are the following:
Invitation for bids;
Instructions to bidders, or qualification information.;
General conditions of contract;
Special conditions of contract;
Bidding data;
Schedule of requirements or bill of quantities;
Technical specifications, drawings and designs; and
Forms of contract and securities.
The bid submission time for LLBs and NCBs is 30 days and that for LIBs and ICBs
45 days minimum respectively.
73. RFPs are prepared and issued to short listed consultancy firms or individual consultants
following an advertisement for expressions of interest. The salient features of RFP are the following:
Letter of invitation;
47
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
G. Receiving Bids
Quotations
The suppliers’ responses to request for quotations must be submitted in sealed envelopes.
Where confidentiality is protected, electronically transmitted responses are accepted.
Suppliers’ offers are collected by a purchaser or hand delivered to the office of the PSMU.
Bids
At bid closing time, the Chairman and Secretary of the Bidding Committee draw double lines
across the page of the form in which bids are recorded and put their signatures underneath.
The lines run under the name of the bid last recorded before bid closing. The lines signify that
no bids were received after the bid closing.
No bids are received after bid closing.
Proposals
Proposals are hand delivered or are mailed to the office of the PPMU Head, and are received
against numbered receipts. Because limited number of proposals are usually received there is
no need for a bid box.
Bidders’ names are recorded on a form, and closed in the same manner as indicated above. No
proposals are received after bid closing.
H. Opening of Bids
Quotations
The Secretary of the Bid Committee delivers the quotations collected by the purchaser and
those submitted to the PSMU office to the Bid Committee at its meeting.
The committee members ensure that the envelopes in which quotations are presented are
properly sealed.
The Secretary of the Committee opens the envelopes and reads the quotations out aloud to
members of the committee.
The members ascertain that the quotations are filled in on the request for quotations form.
Each member of the committee signs the quotations form.
The secretary is asked to prepare a price comparison table. A form should be used for such
price comparison tabulation.
Bids
The Bidding Committee Secretary takes the sealed bid box from its usual stand to the meeting
place of the Bid Committee.
48
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
In case of bulk bids, the bids that are hand delivered are brought to the meeting place of the Bid
Committee.
Attendance of Bid Committee members and bidders or their representatives who wish to attend
bid opening is taken and recorded in a form.
The committee members and the bidders or their representatives ensure that the keyhole and
the slit of the box are sealed with paper that bears the signatures of the Chairman and
Secretary of the Bid Committee.
In the case of bulk bids the committee members and bid participants or their representatives
ascertain that the bid recording form has been closed by the Chairman and Secretary of the
Bidding Committee upon bid closing by drawing double lines underneath the last name and
putting their signatures immediately below.
The seals are broken and the bids taken out of the bid box.
Each bid is held up by the Secretary of the Bid Committee for all to see that its envelope is
sealed and in order.
The Secretary then opens each bid and reads out aloud the highlights of the bid: name of
bidder, total amount of each bid, alternative bids, discounts, bid security, etc.
After all bids are read, the participants are asked if they have any questions on the bid opening,
and the Committee members provide clarification, if any.
The Secretary ensures that the Committee Members sign on all the bids.
Bid opening records are taken during bid opening on the basis of which minutes of the bid
opening is prepared.
Proposals
74. In the case of a two-envelope system, where technical and financial proposals are presented in
separate envelopes within an outer common envelope, the proposal opening procedures are as
follows:
Bid Committee members open the technical proposal.
Bidders or their representatives are invited to attend the financial bid opening –
which for all practical purposes is considered as the public proposal opening.
The Secretary presents the proposals or takes the bid box, whichever is applicable,
to the place of proposal opening.
If a box has been used the Bid Committee ascertains that the keyhole and the box
slit are sealed by a sheet of paper bearing the signatures of the Chairman and Secretary of
the bid committee. The seals are then broken and the proposals taken out of the bid box.
If no bid box has been used the proposal opening participants ensure that the form
on which the list of bidders has been recorded is closed by the Chairman and Secretary of the
Committee upon bid closing and that no proposals are received thereafter.
75. In the case of a one-envelope system, where the technical and financial proposals are
presented in one envelope, the following proposal opening procedures are followed:
The Bid Committee members and bidders or their representatives who wish to attend
participate in the proposal opening.
Technical proposal opening minutes are kept, but bid opening minutes are taken
when financial proposals are opened officially.
76. Both the one- and two-envelope systems public bid openings observe the following procedures:
49
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
The Secretary of the Committee opens each proposal and reads out aloud to the
meeting participants the highlights of the proposals, namely: name of contender, total
amount of proposal, alternative proposals, discounts, security, etc.
The participants are asked if they have any queries after which the members of the
Bid Committee sign on all the proposals.
Records of the opening of outer envelopes and technical proposals are kept but
formal proposal opening minutes are kept only for the financial proposals.
I. Evaluation
Quotations
77. Quotations are compared on the basis of a cost comparison table. Because quotations are
usually requested for goods of standard nature the overriding concern is price. Evaluation on the
basis of the lowest price is, therefore, the most appropriate evaluation method.
Goods
78. In the procurement of goods evaluation is carried out on the basis of the evaluation criteria
already set out in the bidding documents. There are three main evaluation methods:
Evaluation on the basis of the lowest evaluated and responsive bid or Price plus
other factors. Under this method a preliminary examination is made to determine whether
bids are substantially (without material deviation) responsive. Then a detailed examination
is carried out to evaluate and compare bids. And finally the lowest evaluated responsive
bid is determined as the successful bid.
Evaluation on the basis of life cycle cost. This method is used to determine the
initial acquisition cost plus the follow-on ownership costs during the life of a plant or
equipment.
Evaluation on the basis of a merit point system. This method applies merit points
or weightages for technical and price factors to determine the overall most competitive bid.
Works
79. As in the case of goods, evaluation is carried out on the basis of evaluation criteria already set
out in the bidding documents. Bids are first examined on the basis of technical factors such as the
grade classification, experience, present work load, financial strength, ownership of construction
equipment, submission of bid bond, completion time, attendance at bid opening etc. of the contractor.
Bids are then assessed on the basis of price. The evaluation method usually applicable for the
selection of a works contract is the evaluation on the basis of the lowest evaluated and responsive bid
or price plus other factors method.
Proposals
80. Evaluation of proposals is carried out as set out in the request for proposal. There are seven
methods of evaluating proposals:
50
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Quality and cost based selection (QCBS), where quality and cost are the criteria for
selection.
Quality based selection (QBS), where quality alone is the basis for selection.
Fixed budget selection (FBS), where the cost of the services required should not
exceed the allocated budget which is disclosed in the bidding documents.
Least cost selection (LCS), where technical requirements are complied with the
least cost is selected.
Qualification based selection (QBS), where the most qualified individual consultant
or consulting firm is selected.
Single source selection (SCS), where selection is limited by circumstances to only
one person or firm that can provide the desired service.
Negotiation, where it is carried out first with the best bidder and if it proves
unsuccessful, it is carried on with the next successful bidder and so on. But it is not
encouraged as the only method of selection in public/government procurement.
X. RECORDS MANAGEMENT
82. Financial records must be created and preserved for every financial transaction performed
under the project. Financial records are defined as any financial information including written,
computer data, internal forms, e-mails, or any other form of storage information originated from the
NPO such as internal forms, journal vouchers financial reports (Monthly & quarterly) copies of checks
and withdrawal applications etc. or received by the NPO such as supplier invoices and receipts, bank
statements, IFAD documents etc. within the framework of the project's official activities. The objective
of this procedure is to preserve the financial records and files for further official use by the LPA/ Zoba,
for financial audit and for review by the Fund during the supervision missions. The project’s financial
records are the property of the MoA and cannot be removed or destroyed.
It is important to note that in accordance with the IFAD general conditions, the GoE has to
maintain the original records for a minimum 10 years after the project completion.
83. The accountant is responsible for filing the financial records created or received by the project
at his or her respective cost centre (National or Zoba Level). To fulfil this responsibility, the accountant
must maintain chronological files in which the financial documents have to be filed for future
reference. Filing should be performed daily to prevent the accumulation of papers and to ensure that
the financial records are maintained in an up-to-date manner at all times. Each financial record should
be filed under its code in a chronological order, with a sequential number assigned to every document.
Any kind of additions or amendments to the financial document should be filed in a chronological
order immediately following the principal document.
51
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
84. The financial records of the project should be stored in the NPO/ ZPCO office, for a minimum
10 years after the project completion. The data should be stored within the accounting software, as
paper copies, as scanned copies and as computer disc copies. The Financial Officer should allocate
an appropriate storage area for the financial records in paper format and maintain them in locked
cabinets, safe from water and fire, to which access is controlled and limited. The Financial Officer
should also classify the financial records as "Confidential", or "General". All important
correspondences should be filed.
Archiving of financial records
85. In order to prevent an unnecessary pile-up of files in a limited office space, the Financial
Controller/ Accountants should make sure that the financial records are archived on a regularly basis.
Once a year, the Financial Controller/ Accountants should make sure that the completed or inactive
files are archived in a manner that will allow for easy retrieval of the files in case they are required at
some future date.
Back- up procedures
86. To avoid the loss or damage of financial data, the information should be kept in two copies: i) at
the computer server of the NPO/LPA/ ZPCO and ii) in the locked cabinets of the NPO/ ZPCO office.
Only authorised personnel should be allowed to access the financial records without authorization.
The access of external persons is prohibited except for the auditors & IFAD staff.
Segregation of duties
88. An important element in any control system is the separation of those duties which would, if
combined, enable one individual to record and process a complete transaction. It is the Financial
Controller’s responsibility to ensure that the following duties are segregated under the project:
preparation, authorisation, execution, custody, recording and the and operation of systems.
Authorization
89. Authorization controls require the certification that a transaction or event is acceptable for
further processing. Several types of authorization are in effect at the project, mainly in the
procurement cycle, payment cycle, bank and cash management cycle including reconciliation. The
Financial Controller/ accountants should ensure that the authorizations of NPO/ Zoba staff ensure
efficient implementation while keeping the risk as low as possible. The authorization of project staff
should be in line with their respective job descriptions.
90. Reconciliations between independent, corresponding sources of data are a key control for
identifying errors and discrepancies in balances. The Accountants should perform the following
reconciliations each month:
Bank reconciliation
Reconciliation between system and special account receipts and payments statement
Any reconciling or balancing amounts should be promptly cleared. Unusual or long
outstanding reconciling items must be brought to the attention of the head of Finance Unit-
MoU. The head of finance unit will review and sign all reconciliations as evidence of his
review.
In addition physical checks should be performed on assets held and on petty cash.
Restricted Access
91. All data, records and assets should be kept in a physically secure environment. This should
cover safe keeping of finance records such as official order forms and bank details. In addition, any
petty cash should be kept securely. Financial data and other records should also be protected in the
form of back up procedures. All work should be regularly backed up and copy records stored securely
off site
Monitoring and Review
92. Periodic financial reports must be prepared and submitted to the fund. For the purposes of
internal control the same information should be prepared and monitored by the project Coordinators
on a monthly/quarterly basis. The reports should be prepared on a timely basis and should normally
be available for distribution two weeks after the end of the reporting period to which they relate. The
periodic reports should be reviewed by the finance officer and the project coordinator as a minimum.
Where necessary, corrective action should be taken to ensure the authorized budget and procurement
plan is not exceeded.
PANEL “A”
I. Minister of Agriculture; alternate being the Head of Finance and administration
PANEL “B”
I. Head of Finance Unit- MoA
53
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
94. The Operational Accounts denominated in Eritrean Nakfa at the Zobas: The mandate to
operate the accounts and effect financial transactions is delegated to the officers of the day as
detailed below:
PANEL “A”
I. The Governor
PANEL “B”
I. Zoba Head of Finance and Administration
II. The Zoba Project Coordinator (or head of MoA at the Zoba)
2 5
Designated Account
USD Bank of Eretria
3
1
7 Operational Ac c ounts; One for
eac h of the 6 Zobas and 1 for
National Level (Commerc ial Bank of
Eritrea)
Operational A/Cs (7)
95. An explanation of each of the above lines on the NAP funds flow chart of presented below:
Line 1. Direct payments from IFAD to suppliers, etc for disbursements valued with a
minimum value of USD 100 000.
54
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Line 2. Initial allocation into the Designated Accounts (advances from IFAD grant)
and subsequent replenishments. This advance will be replenished until towards
project closure when recovery of the advance starts to take place. With the replenishment
system, the full initial advance should always be reconcilable within the
replenishment cycle as any ineligible expenses incurred will bereplenished back.
Towards project closure the advance to the Designated Account will be recovered
by IFAD by way of justification of expenditure accounted for by NAP. When recovery
commences, NAP will submit SOE justifications and will not be replenished in full, with a
portion going to the credit of the advance account.
Line 3. Transfer of IFAD Grant funds from the designated account to the respective NAP
Operational Accounts for covering eligible local costs in Nakfa.
Line 4. Payments of IFAD Grant portion of costs in Nakfa.
Line 5. GoE parallel financing of its counterpart contribution to NAP.
96. Based on the Funds Flow arrangement discussed above, the following accounting procedure
will apply:
97. Each of the Zoba bank accounts will be accounted for as any other project bank accounts and
any balance remaining on those accounts will be treated as cash and bank balances. The Zobas will
have to submit bank statements along with the reconciled cashbooks to enable the FC at the NPO to
be able to collate the designated account reconciliation.
98. Daily Subsistence Allowances (DSAs): In the spirit of Paris Declaration, NAP will follow GOE
provisions for allowances/DSA rates. The NAP DSA rates are:
Rate
Officers travel from Asmara the Zobas (and ERN 900/ per day
from Zobas to Asmara)
Travel within Zobas ERN 600/ per day
Facilitation allowance- e.g at a training outside ERN 1,500/ per day
normal duty station
99. For international travels, GoE has not yet developed circular on the applicable rates. Therefore,
for these international travel, allowance rates will be based on UN rates for the respective country.
55
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
100. Allowances are paid only when the officer has left his/her work station and should not be paid to
employees executing their normal duties at their work place. For example, if a NAP employee sits on
an evaluation committee, within Asmara, he or she should not be paid a “sitting” allowance; as this is
deemed to be part and partial of his or her work.
Withdrawal Applications
101. The IFAD draft disbursement handbook provides all the guidance and forms needed for the
preparation of withdrawal applications including replenishment applications. It has not been deemed
necessary to reproduce those forms and guidance into this manual.
102. As stated in the LTB and the LDH, four standard disbursement procedures may be used for
withdrawal of financing.
Procedure I
103. Advance withdrawal (using imprest account with replenishment to the Bank of Eritrea.
Procedure II
104. Direct payment. This modality is used for eligible project expenditure to be paid directly by
IFAD, generally for large contracts, to suppliers, contractors or third parties, as authorised by the GoE
over USD 100,000 and to be reviewed by IFAD depending on assessment of the fiduciary risk.
Procedure III
105. Special commitment. This modality is used for eligible project expenditure related to items
imported by specific implementing agencies under letter of credit requiring the issuance of guarantee
for reimbursement to negotiating banks by IFAD.
Procedure IV
106. Reimbursement. This is applicable when eligible project expenditures, reimbursable under the
financing, have been pre-financed by the GoE. Such reimbursements are expected to be claimed not
later than 90 calendar days from the date of payment by the GoE.
108. NAP implementers must note that any delays to justify advances can clog the replenishment
cycle and can result in cash flow implementation constraints. A tool that can be used to measure the
efficiency of a replenishment process is the designated account reconciliation as shown below. Thus
the designated account reconciliation should not always be prepared as formality for inclusion in a WA
but should be used, on a monthly basis, as a performance measure as illustrated below.
109. Illustration on how the designated account reconciliation can be a good management tool for
use by Project Manager and FC to follow-up cash flow situation- it is synonymous to the balance
sheet in the Private Sector.
56
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
6 Plus Total Amount claimed in this x If this amount is materially higher than 20% of the
Application No. xx initial deposits it points at laxity in the
replenishment system. If for example, this amount
is twice or more than the minimum amount for SPA
replenishment. It tells the FC could have lodged a
WA when expenditure reached the minimum
amount of 20% of the initial deposit but because of
laxity/ inefficiency they allow expenditure to over
bulk until expenditure accumulated to this level
which causes cash flow problems.
7 Plus Total Amount withdrawn from x This should cause the NAP Coordinator to demand
bank accounts not yet claimed xx why money to this magnitude has been withdrawn
but is not being included in the WA. The manager
should always demand for a schedule of this
amount—it reflects inefficiency and results in cash
flow problems to withdraw such a magnitude of
money from bank accounts and take such a long
time to replenish it back. Secondly care should be
taken that this figure is not only inserted as a
balancing figure, which would reflects that the
designated account is not well managed.
8 Plus Amounts claimed in previous xxx The WAs in the pipeline, if they take long to be
Applications not yet credited at processed, could reflect that IFAD raised many
date of Bank Statement queries on the quality of the WAs, in which case
the NAP Coordinator could request for staff
training; or it could be delays on the side of IFAD
and in which case the Coordinator would still have
to initiate follow-up from IFAD. It is advisable for
the FC to always follow the status of the WA on
IFAD’s Withdrawal Application Tracking System
(WATTS).
10. TOTAL ADVANCE ACCOUNTED x If this total does not equal to the outstanding initial
57
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
110. It is key for FC to know NAP treasury position at all time in order to better manage the Project’s
liquidity position in a timely and efficient manner. The key goals are to ensure that:
a) There are sufficient funds in treasury to meet the project’s field activities for
implementation.
b) the disbursement rate of the project increases
c) Increase in the performance level of the project and meeting it objectives as in the PDR
111. The key elements on project treasury position are:
a) Status of Designated accounts balances (Using the cash books as at reporting date)
b) Status of the operation accounts balances (Using the cash books as at reporting date)
c) The status of cash in hand (Using the cash book as at reporting date)
d) The money value of WA with IFAD for reimbursement
e) The money value of WA to be submitted to IFAD
112. FC should prepare regular Cash and Expenditures forecasting including taking into account,
realistically, an estimated time when IFAD will actually reimburse the designated accounts, noting the
time frame the WA was presented to IFAD for payment, other considerations will include the time it
takes to complete preparing a withdrawal application.
113. Below is an Indication of NAP treasury plan for a quarter (can be done monthly, quarterly, half-
yearly, annual etc taking to account the realistic timeframes involved in processing a WA.
Formats for use to prepare a Cash flow; the cycle it takes to get a withdrawal application through
and the format for financial position as at a given date:
CASH FLOW FORECAST FOR THE NEXT 3 MONTHS
CATEGORY
58
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
114. Common mistakes made by Projects in submitting WA that NAP must avoid
a) Failing to respect the SOE procedure. The SOE threshold for NAP is currently USD
20,000.
b) Completing the checklist usually attached to withdrawal applications casually, resulting in
incomplete WAs, incomplete supporting documents, wrong correspondent bank which
results into a series of correspondences with IFAD causing delays to receive the funds.
c) Charging wrong categories or submitting WAs against a given category when it is overly
overdrawn.
d) The commonest errors are usually on the designated account reconciliation
Forgetting to attach correct bank statements (Bank statements will be needed for
all bank accounts including those held by the six zobas)
Attaching bank statements with wrong cut-off dates or balance thereon not tallying
with amount shown on the designated account reconciliation
Wrong use of exchange rates thus causing a surplus/shortage on the reconciliation
of the initial deposit
Ineligible expenditure not refunded thus causing a discrepancy on the
reconciliation
Inserting as a “balancing figure” amount withdrawn and not yet replenished without
obtaining a substantive breakdown of the amount
Depositing on a designated account funds other than those drawn from the initial
deposit- eg refunds of items already replenished without corresponding ‘credit
note’ or banking on account proceeds from sale of bids etc. The mistake here is
the failure not to prepare the reconciliation in accordance with the double entry
accounting Principle.
Including on the reconciliation on the part of withdrawal application applications in
the pipeline, direct payments yet these have been nothing to do with the initial
advance.
115. In addition to the bank accounts outlined in the section above, the NPO and ZPCOs will operate
a petty cash account in local currency up to the equivalent of USD 500. The Petty cash will be
operated by the accountant. The purpose of the petty cash is to allow the NPO/ ZPCO to make
payments for low value items (e.g. minor repairs, small supplies, newspapers, taxi fares, and other
sundry expenses) in a quick and efficient manner. Payments through petty cash will only be allowed
for amounts up to the equivalent of USD 50 for a single transaction. The cash is placed in a locked
box which is kept in the NPO/ ZPCO safe.
116. The Petty cash disbursements may be in the form of an advance or a reimbursement (when the
staff member has personally advanced the funds). In both cases, the requesting staff fills out a petty
cash request form. The payee name, the description of the goods or services, the estimated (or
actual) cost and the transaction coding are indicated on the form, which is forwarded to the the
Accountant for processing.
117. For advances, the Accountant delivers petty cash advances on the basis of the approved
request. After the purchase is made, the requestor must return the invoice/receipt along with the
change, if any, to the Account for recording into the Accounting system.
118. For reimbursements (i.e. when the goods or services have already been delivered), the invoice
or receipt is given to the Accountant who reimburses the requesting staff member or directly pays the
supplier. The form is signed by the individual who receives the money.
59
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
119. The petty cash transactions will be recorded in the accounting software petty cash journal as
they happen. At the end of each week, the Accountant will reconcile the petty cash journal with the
physical cash count In addition, a surprise cash count will be conducted by the Accountant or FC
twice a month. It will also be followed by a reconciliation of the petty cash balance per the cash journal
with the actual cash held in the petty cash box.
120. The petty cash will be replenished on a monthly basis (or more often if necessary) on the basis
of the last reconciliation done by the Accountant. The amount of the replenishment will be equivalent
to the total disbursements made since the previous replenishment, so that the petty cash balance is
maintained at the original level of the equivalent of USD 500. No funds can be deposited into the petty
cash, other than the replenishments.
Bank reconciliation
121. The financial controller must perform monthly reconciliations between the designated
account(s) balance recorded on bank statements and local cash book balance, recorded on the
system. Performance of the monthly reconciliation should follow the following steps:
i) Designate Account balance recorded on bank statement on reconciliation date is taken as starting
figure;
ii) Add reimbursements/replenishments/other deposits that have been processed and are due to
designated account, but not yet recorded on bank statements;
iii) Subtract undelivered cheques. Any long-outstanding cheques should be identified and investigated
iv) Following these adjustments, the bank statement and local finance system cash totals should
agree. Any remaining difference should be reported and investigated;
v) The completed bank reconciliation statement should be signed by the finance controller; and
vi) The reconciliation should be reviewed and countersigned by independent finance team member
who understands the reconciliation process.
60
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
122. Similar bank reconciliations will be undertaken on a monthly basis for each of the project bank
accounts. Periodic designated account reconciliations will be submitted IFAD as part of periodic
progress report.
124. For all payments, the Accountant should ensure that the following steps are
performed:
i) Preparation of Payment request voucher. A payment request voucher should be prepared for
each payment.
ii) Validation of invoice. The following validation checks should be performed by the Accountant
on invoice:
o Invoice arithmetically correct; and
o Quantity and price recorded on invoice should be checked back to
contract, order, certification of completion/delivery. If there is any
discrepancy identified, it should be raised with the vendor prior to
proceeding with invoice processing,
iii) Supporting documentation: the following documents should be attached to the payment
voucher to support validation:
o Copy of invoice;
o Copy of letter of approval from technical committee or the specialist,
Director PSD or the minister;
o Copy of purchase order, goods received note and contract if applicable;
and
o Copy of required guarantees
Payment Documentation
125. Payments must be supported; and in GoE there are certain minimum set of supporting
documentation that should be attached to a payment/ journal voucher. To ensure that the Zobas and
other implementers’ collect all the supporting documents, the following checklists are provided; they
should be ticked-off carefully and attached to each cheque payment voucher.
61
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
4. Accuracy of
Computations/footings
62
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
127. The Expenditure Cycle for works and goods is detailed in the following chart:
Procurement Officer:
Prepare payment Request
Technical Approval by the supervising
Attach technical approval & other
Engineer (s), or technical committee involved
supporting documents
in the activity
Attach contractor’s/ supplier invoice and
Delivery Notes
Zoba Project Coordinator/ NAP Cost Centre NAP accountant/ Financial Controller
Coordinator at national level: Checks the accuracy of payment request
Review payment request & and supporting documents
supporting documents Verify the payment request’s compliance
Authorize and sign payment request with the contract
In case of national level, approval of Prepare cheques or withdrawal application
National Project Coordinator/ in case of direct payment
Director PSD
128. Before releasing the payment to the contractor or supplier, the NAP accountants will make sure
the following processes are followed:
The quantity of goods is checked back to the purchase order and to contract and bid award
letter (if applicable). The committee members, assigned by steering committee/LPA after being
assured that quality of goods is compliant with the contract conditions deliver an accepted
delivery sheet or a compliant report to the Procurement Officer. The Financial Controller/
accountants will ensure that the Procurement Officer provides all the necessary documents
including the invoice and the acceptance/compliant report before proceeding with the payment.
The condition of the goods are reviewed for any damage or impairments. Damaged goods are
to be identified and returned to the supplier/replaced. If any goods are rejected or returned to
the supplier because they are not as ordered or are of sub-standard quality, the Financial
Controller should be notified. Financial Controller/ accountants must keep a central record of all
goods returned to suppliers and maintain a separate record of all goods and equipment
delivered by suppliers by contracts funded by the IFAD financing.
All the works, are to be monitored by an architect or engineer. It is good practise to assign the
architect/engineer responsible for the design to monitor and assess the works of the contractor.
The architect or engineer is responsible for sending compliant reports/certificate of completion
to the Procurement Officer which includes the percentage of completion of the construction and
if the construction materials are compliant with the contract conditions and specifications. A
63
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
request for payment is prepared by the Procurement Officer to be sent to the accountant. The
accountant will ensure that the payment request includes all the necessary documents
including the invoice and the compliant reports/certificate of completion before proceeding with
the payment to the contractor for the completed phase.
129. Under the Project there are two types of consultants' services; a) Consultants with a lump sum
contract, and b) Consultants with a time based contract. For type (a) consultants, payments will be
made against the delivery of outputs as detailed in their contracts. For type (b) consultants, payments
will be made against the submission of a time sheet and a summary of activities performed.
130. The Expenditure Cycle for type (a) consultants is detailed in the following chart:
Procurement Officer:
Prepare payment Request
Technical Approval of acceptance
Attach technical approval & other
committee involved in the activity
supporting documents
Attach consultant’s invoice
Zoba Project Coordinator/ NAP Cost Centre NAP accountant/ Financial Controller
Coordinator at national level: Checks the accuracy of payment request
Review payment request & and supporting documents
supporting documents Verify the payment request’s compliance
Authorize and sign payment request with the contract
In case of national level, approval of Prepare cheques or withdrawal application
National Project Coordinator/ in case of direct payment
Director PSD
131. The Expenditure Cycle for type (b) consultants is detailed in the following chart:
64
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
132. Before releasing the payment to the consultant (firms), the Financial Controller will undertake
the following steps:
The consulting services reports are monitored by technical committees, assigned by the
steering committee/LPA for the purpose of evaluating the deliverables submitted by the
consultant (firms). Therefore the financial controller will ensure that no payment to the
consultant is prepared unless an approved committee report or letter of approval received from
the committee assures that the deliverable submitted by the consultant is compliant with the
contract conditions, these documents should be passed first through the Procurement Officer.
The consulting services reports are monitored by the specialist responsible for the activity for
the purpose of evaluating the deliverables submitted by the consultant (Individual Consultant).
Therefore the Financial Controller will ensure that no payment to the consultant is prepared
unless an approved report received from the specialist assures that this report is compliant with
the contract terms and conditions, these documents should be passed first through the
procurement officer.
133. All Supporting Documents and Internal Forms must be retained at the NPO Office in the LPA/
ZPCO and must be maintained and archived in accordance with the maintenance of records section
of this manual.
Processing of Payments for Office Supplies and Other Operating Costs
134. The payment for office supplies and operating cost will be against the preparation by the
procurement officer of a serially numbered checklist evidencing the receipt of office supplies, and the
presentation of the Purchase order and supplier invoice. The financial controller/ accountants will
compare the information on the checklist to the purchase order and supplier invoice, then sign the
checklist. The payment for services is against the presentation by the supplier performing the service
of a service invoice.
65
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
136. Under the Project there is a budget allocated for workshops and study tours as well as staff
training courses. The following chart summarizes the transaction cycle that should be followed to get
approval for the travel and the expenditures related to it:
66
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
138. In addition to the AWPB, supervision reports and audit reports the Financial Controller will
ensure that the following financial reports are prepared in a timely manner and submitted to IFAD in
due time (applicable to reports 2-4 only):
i. Monthly financial reports for NPO internal use only. These reports will be verified during IFAD
supervision missions.
ii. Periodic (semi-annual) progress reports, to be provided to IFAD within 45 days after the
reporting period
iii. Annual financial statements, to be provided to IFAD within 4 months after the end of the
project fiscal year.
iv. Annual financial statements audited by an independent auditor acceptable to the Fund and in
accordance with internationally accepted auditing standards and terms of reference cleared
by IFAD, to be provided to IFAD within 6 months after the project fiscal year (explained in
detail in section 11).
Monthly Reports
139. In accordance with best practises, the Financial Controller/ respective accountants will prepare
monthly financial reports based on the accounting system to aid management decision and control.
The monthly management accounts will include the following.
Monthly Budget Execution Report, summarising the budget-actual comparison of the
expenditures incurred, component-wise and category-wise. The report will also include a list
of commitments entered into and still to be paid, by component and by category. (See
ANNEX IV)
Bank Reconciliation Statement
Petty Cash reconciliation form (See ANNEX IX)
140. Semi-annual progress reports should be submitted to IFAD no later than 45 days after the end
of reporting period during the project implementation period. SEE ANNEX II and XIII
141. The importance of the periodic progress reports lies in the fact that they provide GoE/ IFAD with
sufficient information to determine whether the funds disbursed to the project are being used as
intended, the project implementation is on track and the budgeted costs will not be exceeded. The
financial information should be linked to the information on physical progress and procurement to give
assurance that the financial and physical progress are consistent.
142. The Periodic Progress Reports include the following:
67
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
143. NAP follows the IPSAS Cash basis of accounting. The annual statements are provided to IFAD
within four months after the end of the fiscal year. In accordance with the Project Design Report, the
project will prepare it financial statements in accordance with IPSAS cash basis.
144. The project financial statements should include the following information:
Project Information and performance,
Purchase of Equipment
147. All procurement and payments for project equipment will be processed in line with the guidance
provided in the procurement section of the PIM. The accountant financial officer should assign a
unique, sequential asset number to all furniture and equipment items purchased (excluding minor
items such as stationary).This must be clearly labelled on each item. Each item of equipment must be
recorded in the fixed asset register.
Asset Register
148. The accountant must maintain a register of all (material) project equipment. The asset register
should record the following information for each individual piece of equipment: 1) Asset description, 2)
Asset number, 3) Serial number of the item, 4) Officer responsible for asset, 5) Funding of asset
(IFAD, government etc..), 6) Location; Date of purchase; and 7) Estimated life. The
Asset Verification Review
149. The Financial Controller must ensure that a verification count of all equipment recorded in the
fixed asset register is performed at least once a year. This should include the following checks:
Verify that all equipment is still held in the location recorded on the register; and
Check that equipment is still in a reasonable state of repair.
Discrepancies between the verification exercise and the fixed asset register should be investigated.
Where assets are missing or seriously damaged, they should be removed from the asset register. The
removal should be formally documented and approved by the respective Coordinator at the cost centre.
150. The verification review must be performed by different staff from those who use the equipment,
to ensure adequate segregation of duty.
Vehicle Maintenance and Fuel
151. The drivers are required to record all trips and fuel refills in a logbook and collect all the
supporting documentation (invoices etc.). The vehicle logbook provides control over the use of the
cars as well as fuel consumption. For official missions, a special cash provision is given to mission
leaders to allow them to purchase fuel during the trip.
152. The safety of cars is the responsibility of the recipient staff members and drivers assigned to
the vehicles. Consequently, they must ensure that the cars are parked in a secure area when not in
use or outside working hours. The drivers are required to monitor the maintenance of their assigned
vehicles under the supervision of the NPO. The drivers must notify the NPO/ ZPCO of maintenance
needs so that the cars can be serviced on a timely basis.
153. The accountant should on a monthly basis review the mileage and fuel usage as well as any
undertaken service as reported in the log book of each car and compare these with the official
invoices and travel authorizations etc. to make sure the numbers are accurate.
154. An insurance policy must be taken by the NPO/ZPCO to ensure all cars and passengers
against all risks, including damage, theft, fire, as well as injury and property damage to third parties.
The insurance must also cover the same risks when the cars are used by the recipient staff members
outside of normal working hours.
69
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
In accordance with the IFAD general conditions and the IFAD guidelines for project audits, the
NPO must have NAP financial statements audited by an external auditor acceptable to IFAD. The
Audited financial statements need to be sent to IFAD no later than 6 months after the end of the fiscal
year. The detailed instruction regarding project audit are outlined in the IFAD guidelines for project
audits available at http://www.ifad.org/pub/basic/index.htm. See also TOR for auditors Annex XI.
156. The complete audit cycle can be divided into the three main roles carried out by the financial
controller/NPO, the Auditor and IFAD.
157. The NPO will:
Timely prepare TORs of the Audit and submit these to the Fund for no objection, (See
Annex XI)
manage the selection process of the auditor (if relevant)
liaise with the Auditor General to appoint the auditor.
Prepare the financial statements for reporting period
Make available all the financial information necessary to the auditors.
NPO should respond to the audit findings and recommendations.
Submit the audit report to the fund no later than 6 months after the end of the project
fiscal year.
158. The Auditor will:
perform the audit work including the three audit opinions
Indicate any ineligible expenditures
Provide a management letter
159. The Fund will:
Provide a non objection to the auditors TORs
Monitor timely submission and review of audit reports
Follow up on remedial action\apply sanction and /or remedies if relevant including
suspension of disbursement and or cancellation of grant balance (Legal Notice is sent
to the LPA after 3 months of delay. Suspension of disbursement to the project after 6
months delay.)
70
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
160. When appointing the auditor the financial officer will need to ensure that the following steps are
followed:
a) Financial Officer/NPO prepares TORs for the auditor and sends it to IFAD for review
and no-objection.
b) IFAD communicates “no objection” to GoE.
c) NPO requests the Auditor General to appoint an auditor using the agreed TORs.
d) Financial Officer/NPO informs IFAD of the name of proposed auditor
e) IFAD communicates “no objection” to GoE on the proposed auditor upon performance
of the necessary due diligence.
f) NPO appoints the auditor.
g) The auditor appointed normally issues a formal engagement letter
161. When preparing auditors TORs the financial officer should address the point outlined below:
a) Description of the employing project authority or entity;
b) Term of the auditor’s engagement, namely whether it is for a fiscal year or some
c) other period;
d) Description and the timing of the financial statements and other material to be provided
by project management for the audit;
e) Terms for delivery of the audit report;
f) Specification that the audit be carried out in accordance with internationally accepted
auditing standards;
g) Provision of a management letter;
h) Statement of access to project records, documents and personnel available to the
auditor;
i) Details regarding submission of a proposal and work plan by the auditor.
j) A description in the TORs of the entity engaging the auditor and whether it is acting on
behalf of or is a constituent part of a larger entity
k) Legal and general descriptions of the project and the LPA, in sufficient detail to enable
the auditor to understand their nature, objectives and activities.
163. The auditors are required to provide a formal engagement letter confirming their acceptance of
the appointment and outlining the methodology, scope and responsibilities under the audit The GoE’s
representative will sign and return a copy of the letter to the auditor.
164. The Audit Report must include the following elements which should also be reflected in the
auditor’s TORs:
An opinion on the Project’s financial statements
A separate opinion on the eligibility of expenditures included in the WA /Statement
of Expenditure procedure
71
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
A separate opinion if the use of the Designated Account is in compliance with the
financing agreement
In addition to the audit report, the independent auditor will prepare a management
letter. This will include comment and recommendations on the adequacy of the financial
management system, and on the system of internal control. The management letter should
also include a follow up section on the status of implementation of previous years
recommendations
165. The project will be subject to extensive supervision from IFAD during the whole implementation
period to ensure that the NPO fiduciary requirements are completed on time and to minimise the
project’s fiduciary risk.
166. If financial arrangements of the NPO are deemed acceptable, IFAD will rely on them to provide
assurance that the financing proceeds are being used for the intended purposes. In the case that
IFAD identifies weaknesses in the financial arrangements, it will require the NPO to take the
appropriate measures to mitigate those risks e.g. changing the design and operation of internal
control processes or modifying the disbursement arrangements for an operation.
167. The IFAD supervision of the project includes the following measures:
168. Throughout project implementation, IFAD will conduct annual financial supervisory missions to
develop financial management ratings and ensure compliance with the IFAD’s requirements. During
the supervisory missions, IFAD will assess and monitor the adequacy of the NPO/ZPCO financial
management arrangements such as accounting, budgeting, internal controls, flow of funds, financial
reporting and the auditing practices. The key findings and recommendations of the mission will be
captured in the Aid Memoire.
169. When preparing for and during an IFAD supervisions mission, the necessary supporting actions
by the financial controller will include the following:
Update and make available for the mission, the project financial information and especially
the incurred expenditures by component, by category and by financier as of the last day of
the preceding month.
Update and make available reports on the status of counterpart funding (has the GoE/Lead
Project Agency made available financing proceeds to the Project as planned?
Provide a walk through of the existing accounting system including its main modules,
budgeting, accounting, financial reports, fixed asset register as well as the security settings in
use.
Facilitate checking of the internal controls, by system “walk through” to ensure that approved
procedures are consistently being followed.
Make available Withdrawal Applications, Statement of Expenditures and all supporting
documentation regarding expenditures claimed under the SOE thresholds to facilitate the
verifying of adequacy, completeness and validity of claims.
72
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Make available evidence of qualifications and educational background of the financial staff
including, organogram of the NPO, CVs, TORs of each position and NPO training plan.
Update and make available a complete a fixed asset register and facilitate sample test check
of physical existence of the asset.
Make available written procedures regarding financial operations such as processing of
transactions, financial administration manual, accounting manual, fixed asset maintenance
and records management as well as the lead project agency’s anticorruption policy and
whistle blowing procedures.
Prepare and make available the updated bank account reconciliation statement and bank
account statements for all designated and project accounts.
Arrange meeting with the auditors and any other selected party requested by the mission.
Make available all necessary documentation and contracts regarding procurement not subject
to prior review.
Provide an update on the actions taken regarding past audit recommendations as well as
action points outlined in the past aide memoires.
Make available the most recent AWPBs, annual and semi-annual reports
Participate in report writing if necessary.
170. The closing of the grant/grant is due six months after the project completion date. Both the
completion and the closing date of the grant have financial implications on the project management
such as: development and submission of a recovery plan, ensuring eligibility of expenditures and
submission of the necessary documents outlined below. Please also refer to section 1.3 of the
Disbursement Handbook.
Recovery plan
171. To ensure that the designated account is completely and timely justified, the financial
officer/NPO has to develop and submit to the Fund a so called recovery plan outlining the
percentages per withdrawal application that will recovered and paid respectively. The recovery plan
should be submitted to the fund around 6 months before the completion date or when the outstanding
balance (amount still undisbursed by IFAD is less than the double of the authorized allocation. See
format on Annex VI.
Grant Completion
172. As defined in the Financing agreement the completion date of the grant its 6 th anniversary; that
is six years after it entered into force. By the completion date all the project activities must have been
finalised. The payments can be done also after the completion date, as long as the commitments/
contracts are signed prior to the completion date. Activities that have continued after the completion
date are not considered as ineligible expenditures and can therefore not be financed by the IFAD
funds.
173. After the completion date but no later than the closing date (six months after the completion
date) the NPO can still incur expenditures related to so called winding up expenditures e.g. Final
Audit, Project completion report, Project staff salaries involved in the winding up activities, NPO
maintenance cost, project completion workshop.
Grant Closure
73
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
174. The Fund requires the following to be provided by the NPO in order to close the grant:
The Final Audit Report has to cover, the final project year up to the final expenditures and it can
be paid from the grant available balance by using for example direct payment or Reimbursement of
pre financed expenditures.
74
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
ANNEX I:
0
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER THREE: THE WORK PLAN FOR 1ST JANUARY 20XX TO 31ST DECEMBER 20XX
3.1 Introduction
3.2 The Plan Description
-1-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
ANNEX
Updated Logical Framework
TABLES:
Table 1.1: Allocation of Budget & Financing by Component.
Table 1.2: Allocation of Budget and Financing by Category
Table 2: Estimated Financial Status by Component
Table 3: Programme – Estimated Financial Status by Category
Table 4.1: Unimplemented Plan Activities & Budget Rolled Over
Table 4.2: Summary of Budget by Component compared with previous year
Table 5: Summary Budget & Financing by Component/Sub-Component
Table 6: Summary Budget Estimate & Financing by Category/Sub-Category
Table 7.1: Detailed Budget Estimate Component 1
Table 7.2: Detailed Budget Estimate Component 2
Table 7.3: Detailed Budget Estimate Component 3
Table 8: Budget Estimate by Component/Sub-Component
Table 9: Budgeting Estimate by Category of Expenditure
Table 10: Schedule of implementation – monthly & responsibilities
Table 11: Results framework – RIM Levels 1&2
Table 12: Cost Centre/Implementing Institution
Table 13: NAP Consolidated Inputs/Contracts Services Requirement
Table 14: NAP 18-month Procurement Plan for the Programme – NAP
Table 15: Expected Benefits – Quantitative
Table 16: Estimation of Beneficiaries
Table 17: Constraints/Risk Analysis
-2-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
PROGRAMME DATA
-3-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
The executive summary should be concise but should reflect important aspects of AWPB, particularly
those areas that may involve key decisions on policy, strategy, or amendment of Financing
Agreement particularly reallocation of proceeds. A maximum of 3 pages including the two tables is
expected.
Budget Financing
Component Sub-Component Budget Budget IFAD GOE Benefici Others
USD ERN Grant USD ary USD
USD USD
Watershed
Characterisation
Agriculture Water Improvement of
Resources meteorology and
Development hydrology systems
Agriculture Infrastructure
development
Development of National
Seed System
Integrated Input Supply
Agriculture
Technology generation
Production
and dissemination
Livestock support
Project Support
Services and
Capacity
Total
% Financed
-4-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Budget Financing
Category Total Total IFAD GOE Beneficiary Others
Budget Budget Grant USD USD USD
USD ERN USD
Civil Works
Vehicles, Motorcycles, Equipment
and Materials
Agricultural and Livestock Inputs
Technical Assistance, Training
Workshops and Studies
Recurrent costs- operations and
maintenance
Total
% Financed
This chapter will give an overview of the programme, the target groups, the component description,
cost and financing, implementation arrangements, and benefits/ beneficiaries. This chapter invariably
will remain constant for the implementation period, unless major changes are made by GOE/IFAD.
The basic contents are shown below.
This chapter should show the summary of achievements to date both in physical and financial terms.
Constraints of implementation should be highlighted. The number of target beneficiaries reached
should be provided and disaggregated by gender. An important purpose of the chapter is to show the
physical achievement so far and reflect lessons learnt and which influence the plan focus; reflect the
resource available by component and category of expenditure. The chapter contents are shown
below. The chapter should not exceed 3 pages (Text and Tables)
-5-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
2.11
Table 2 – Estimated Financial Status by Component as at 31st December 20XX
NAP Estimated
Total Actual
Commitments Expenditure Total
Allocated Expenditure
Component Sub- Component As 0f 30TH for the last Estimated Balance
Cost As of 31
September Quarter of the Expenditure
(USD) SEPT 20XX .
20XX Project Year
Watershed Characterisation
Agriculture
Water Improvement of meteorology and
Resources hydrology systems
Development Agriculture Infrastructure
development
Development of National Seed
System
Integrated Input Supply
Agriculture
Technology generation and
Production
dissemination
Livestock support
Project Support
Services and
Capacity
Total
-6-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Actual Estimated
Expenditure As NAP Expenditure
Total
Total of 31 Commitments for the last
Category Estimated Balance
Allocated September As 0f 30TH Quarter of
Expenditure
March--- the Project
20XX Year
Civil Works
Total
Table: 4 Unimplemented Plan Activities and Budget Rolled-Over to the Following Year (20--)
Activity Budget 20-- IFAD Grant GOE (c) Beneficiary (d) Total (b+c+d) Category of Remark
(b) expenditure
-7-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
III. THE WORK PLAN FOR 1ST JANUARY 20XX TO 31ST DECEMBER 20XX
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The section should provide a short background on the area where implementation of the plan
will occur i.e. the focal areas and District, demography and Agricultural Extension Area/village
classification by rural/urban, agriculture – constraints and opportunities, crops, livestock, the
relative importance of enterprises under focus, the main production area of focal crops and
livestock (maximum 1 ½ pages)
The section should document lessons from past implementation and how the proposed plan has
addressed them, constraints and problems which have been identified and which influence the
proposed plan should be highlighted, the process of plan preparation including involvement of target
groups and implementing agencies should be reflected. The plan should be clearly defined by
components/sub-components/activities and quantified as much as possible.
Should be properly aligned with the plan and comparison of budget with the past year
expenditure/commitments, should be presented with explanations on any deviation. The allocation by
components/sub-components, categories/sub-categories should be highlighted in the text, and
reflected accurately in the summary tables. The financing plan should be consistent with financing
agreement/appraisal, unless if they have been changed by GOE/IFAD. Financing by others should
be explicit i.e. name of other financiers indicated. This can vary from year to year. The government
contribution should include the contribution from participating Districts, if any. Contribution by
Beneficiaries are expected in cash and kind; the basis for in-kind contribution estimate should be
provided and remain consistent with other years i.e. labour valuation should reflect the market wage
rate for the type of labour provided.
-8-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Watershed
Characterisation
Improvement of
Agriculture Water meteorology and
Resources
Development hydrology systems
Agriculture
Infrastructure
development
Development of
National Seed
System
Input Supply
Integrated Agriculture
Production Technology
generation and
dissemination
Livestock support
Project Support
Services and Capacity
Total
a
/ This column refers to current year- information to be consistent with table 2
b
/ This column refers to following year
-9-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Financing % Financed
Budget by
IFAD
Total GOE
Total Budget IFAD Grant Total IFAD Beneficiaries
Components/Sub-components Budget USD
USD USD USD USD
ERN
Agriculture Water Watershed
Resources
Development Characterisation
Improvement of
meteorology and
hydrology systems
Agriculture
Infrastructure
development
Integrated Development of
Agriculture National Seed
Production System
Input Supply
Technology
generation and
dissemination
Livestock support
Project Support
Services and
Capacity
Total
% Financed
- 10 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Total
% Financed
- 11 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
The detailed cost tables should provide necessary details – by components/subcomponents activities, items of expenditure, unit of measure,
timing of operation and costs. The estimates should first be done by components – Tables 7.1 – 7.3. Each table is by component. Thus, there will
be as many tables as there are components. The last 2 columns should be carefully done as they are the basis for defining IFAD financing in
tables 8 and 9. Note that tables 8 and 9 are summation of tables 7.1 – 7.3
Table 7.1 - Detailed Budget Estimate – Component - 1
Watershed Characterisation
Improvement of meteorology and
hydrology systems
Agriculture Infrastructure
development
Sub- Activities Items of Unit of Unit Physical inputs Total Category/Sub- % of Total
Component Expenditure Measure Cost by inputs Budget USD Total category of financed by
USD Period of Operation budget Expenditure IFAD
USD Specification
Development of
National Seed
- 12 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Sub- Activities Items of Unit of Unit Physical inputs Total Category/Sub- % of Total
Component Expenditure Measure Cost by inputs Budget USD Total category of financed by
USD Period of Operation budget Expenditure IFAD
USD Specification
System
Input Supply
Technology
generation and
dissemination
Livestock
support
Sub- Activities Items of Unit of Unit Physical inputs Total Category/Sub- % of Total
Component Expenditure Measure Cost by inputs Budget USD Total category of financed
USD Period of Operation budget Expenditure by IFAD
USD Specification
Project
Support
Services and
Capacity
- 13 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
- 14 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Project
Support
Services and
Capacity
Total
The table is a summation of component wise budget i.e. 7.1 to 7.3
- 15 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Table 9 – Budget Estimate by Category of Expenditure (IFAD) – Budget Code – Project/Quarterly Allocation and Financing USD
This table is a summation of the components budget using information provided in the column of category/sub-category of expenditure – table 7.1
to 7.3
- 16 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
V. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT
This chapter should present details of implementation arrangements with clear specifications of
responsibilities. An important area often neglected is the staff capacity building. The Programme
Coordinator (PC) should ensure that this aspect is appropriately covered with a stipulation of training
planned, timing, where, who, cost and justification. The procurement plan (18 months projection)
should be prepared in detail following the IFAD established standard and using information provided
by implementing institutions. However, list of items to be procured must be prepared by implementing
agencies (Table 12) and consolidated by the PC as a basis for sound procurement plan. Procurement
of goods and services is a critical management area that needs special attention, in order to ensure
that programme funds are spent wisely, and that the goods and services obtained under the
programme are in line with needs, and of good quality. For these reasons, proposed procurement
plan will be summarized in a table that lists all the facilities, equipment, technical assistance,
contracts and other services that are to be procured. Minimum information on each item will include a
description with quantities, the procurement method, when the goods or services are expected to be
delivered, and the estimated cost. It will be useful to hold a meeting of implementing agencies (cost
centres), and the procurement unit of MOAFS to jointly review and have an agreement/common
understanding on the consolidated inputs/contracts before the procurement plan is draw-up. The
meeting of concerned implementing agencies should also be held to agree on the 18 month
procurement plan. Table 9 schedule of implementation and responsibilities should be carefully
prepared in close collaboration with the implementing agencies, and should be followed by an
implementation chart done on quarterly basis. The results framework table should be prepared and
should relate to the annual work plan and budget and not the appraisal estimates.
- 17 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Component Sub- Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Responsibility
Component
Activities
Watershed
Characterisatio
n
Improvement of
Agriculture Water meteorology
Resources
Development and hydrology
systems
Agriculture
Infrastructure
development
Development of
National Seed
System
Integrated Input Supply
Agriculture
Technology
Production
generation and
dissemination
Livestock
support
Project Support
Services and
Capacity
7
Please follow this table with quarterly implementation schedule chart
- 18 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Table 12: Cost Centre/Implementing Institution (Insert name) Summary of input requirements for PY…. (20______) programme
- 19 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
This table will be prepared based on the AWPB of every implementing agency/Cost Centre for NAP. The head of the implementing unit/cost centre
and his or her monitoring and evaluation officer, and accountant will prepare this table.
VI. SUMMARY INPUT/CONTRACTS/SERVICES AND 18-MONTH PROCUREMENT PLAN FOR THE PROGRAMME
This chapter should be the responsibility of the NAP Coordinator, and his or her Monitoring and Evaluation Officer, his Financial Controller and
procurement officer in consultation with the Head of the respective Implementation Unit/Cost Centre. The chapter include Table 13 and 14 as
shown below.
Table 13: NAP Consolidated Inputs/Contracts Services Requirement for the PY- (20______) By Zobas/ Sub Zobas
This table will be prepared by NAP Coordinator assisted by his/her relevant staff and it is a summary of table 12 from all Zobas. It is a table
showing the required items to be procured across implementing agencies. This table will provide the basis for producing the 18-Months
consolidated procurement plan for NAP.
- 20 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
The 18-month Procurement plan will not be prepared by implementing agencies/cost centres but
implementing agencies will provide input (Reference Table 12 & 13). Table 14 will be prepared by a
team of programme coordinator (NAP) and his relevant staff, the heads of implementing units and
cost centres along with their relevant staff, and the procurement officer of NAP.
Table 14: NAP 18-Month Procurement Plan for the Programmes - NAP
The expected benefits and beneficiaries should be in line with the AWPB and quantified as much as
possible. The beneficiaries should be disaggregated by gender. The qualitative benefits are
important and should be covered. The presentation in this chapter should be in harmony with the
results framework (Table 11).
Short Text
- 21 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
From experience, the possible constraints and risks that may hamper the implementation of the
AWPB should be identified along with the actions included in the plan to mitigate them. The
presentation should be real and practical and not a repeat of what is set-out in the Appraisal Report.
1. Constraints
2. Risks
- 22 -
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
ANNEX
The Logical Framework Table in the Appraisal Report needs to be reviewed and updated. Please include
as much quantified targets by year as possible. The first review of the logical framework will be after PY1
and based on the findings of the baseline study and the implementation experience. Since no additional
information will be available in PY1 for a review of what have been set-out in the appraisal report, there
will not be a need to include this annex in the AWPB for PY1. However, should you wish to include, for
information, use the logical framework as set-out in the Final Design Report. The indicators will
progressively reflect actual situation with the progress in implementation.
23
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
24
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
ANNEX
ACTION ON THE PREVIOUS SUPERVISION MISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
TABLES:
Table 1: Summary of the approved Budget by Component
Table 2: Financial & physical progress performance
Table 3: Cumulative financial and physical progress performance
Table 4: Implementation performance measured against Appraisal Target
Table 5: Benefits/Impact measured against Appraisal Target
Table 6: Beneficiaries reached compared with Appraisal Target
Table 7: Financial status report
Table 8: RIMS Reporting Form
Table 9: Constraints and proposed solutions
TABLE 10: RESPONSES TO LAST SUPERVISION MISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
25
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
INTRODUCTION
Progress reports are a formal requirement; the loan/grant financing agreements dictate these
requirements, and half-yearly and annual reports are usually to be submitted to IFAD and the other co-
financing institutions. Sufficient information must be made available about expenditures, by
component/subcomponent; activities and items of expenditure; and what the results are (output, outcome,
and impact).
The main functions of progress report are to keep informed the GOE, IFAD and other financiers, the
progress of implementation in terms of achievements (output, outcome, beneficiaries, impact), and related
expenditure; highlight issues that need to be addressed for improved performance; and provide
management information to aid effective decision making on a timely basis. progress report requires that
implementing agencies and programme management records data, carefully analyse such data to
evaluate performance, discover weaknesses that can be improved and successes that can be expanded
on. it is this process of analysis performance evaluation, and reflection that constantly bring to focus the
extent of achieving the objective and goal of the programme/project
26
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
This chapter will have three parts: 1.1 – Background Information on Programme; 1.2 – Summary of
Current AWPB and 1.3 – Sources of Information for the progress report.
This section should include no more than a couple of sentences on some background information about
the programme/project, mainly as a reminder for people in government or outsiders who do not deal with
the project on a daily basis.
This sub-section should provide a summary of the current AWPB on which the report is being produced.
Efforts should be made not to reproduce Appraisal Report information. The summary would be
adequately presented under the following sub-titles followed by Table 1:
a) Plan Goal;
b) Plan Objective;
c) Summary of the AWPB.
Budget Financing
Total Total Other GOE Beneficiary
Component Budget Budget IFAD Grant Financier(s) Total ERN USD
Sub-Component USD ERN USD USD
Agriculture Water Watershed
Resources Characterisation
Development
Improvement of
meteorology and
hydrology systems
Agriculture
Infrastructure
development
Integrated Development of
Agriculture National Seed System
Production
Input Supply
Technology generation
and dissemination
Livestock support
Project Support
Services and
Capacity
Total
27
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
% Financed
This sub-section should describe the sources of information on which this report is based. This could
include monthly/quarterly progress reports that have been produced by the implementing agencies,
consultants’ reports, studies, important elements of the M&E system, such as registers of assets and
contracts, etc. It could also be useful to indicate how the report has been prepared. The basic facts and
figures should be verified and consolidated by the M&E Officers. In situations where some findings may
have been arrived at during one or more review workshops, or through specific impact studies, this should
be stated.
This chapter presents the physical and financial progress of the project starting with a text description and
followed by the tabulated form. The chapter should capture implementation progress not only for the
particular year covered by the report (except for PY1) but cumulative progress. It would also be important
and useful to include explanation when actual performance (financial and physical) differ significantly from
the plan and budget; and when actual achievements (physical) do not have close relationship with the
related budget E.g. 57% of the budget has been spent on achieving 24% of physical targets in the
current Project Year. This chapter should have three sections namely, 2.1 – Physical and Financial
Progress of Implementation/Performance: Current year: PY-- (20...........); 2.2 – Cumulative
Implementation Progress/Performance; and 2.3 – Financial Report.
The information in this sub-section will be based on detailed monitoring data that is collected from the
field or from reports submitted by various implementing agencies. This data will have to be interpreted
and summarized by the M&E Officers in collaboration with relevant implementing Officers.
The aim of this section is to provide insight into project results, principally at the level of key activities
indicating specific outputs and outcome produced in relation to expenditure and budget. Each of the main
project components has an approximate budget in the project design. Each component/sub component
pursues specified objectives, and jointly the components will contribute to achieving the programme
development objectives and goal. Costs to implement the component/sub component to achieve the
objectives and goal are also specified in the final design report (appraisal report), and are translated into
annual work plan and budget. It is therefore important to relate expenditures to physical achievements in
the form of outputs and outcomes. However, in a reporting period outputs/outcomes may not be achieved
because the implementation is ongoing. In such cases necessary explanation should be provided in the
comment columns of the report or/and in the text. When expenditure under a certain component falls far
behind the planned expenditure, this should be cause for concern, the reasons should be investigated
and action taken. The section should discuss the observed annual trends followed by Table 2. It should
be noted that table 2 reports on the result framework targets as contained in AWPB measured against
budget and expenditure.
Table 3 – Cumulative performance evaluation should be prepared on an annual basis starting from PY2.
The table should show cumulative achievements by summing up the data as reported in table 2. Note
however, that the table refers only to the AWPB and not appraisal targets. Table 4 address achievements
against appraisal targets.
28
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
Table 2: Financial and physical Progress Performance as at DAY/MONTH/YEAR (i.e. reporting period)
Watershed
Characterisation
Activities
XXXXXX
Improvement of
meteorology and
hydrology systems
Activities
XXXXXX
Agriculture
Infrastructure
development
Activities
XXXXXX
6
Put date referring to the reporting period; it should either be 31 Dec of the project year (for the six-monthly Project Progress Report) or 30 June of the Project Year (for
the annual Project Progress Report)
29
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
2.2 Cumulative Performance measured against Appraisal Target
The aim of this section is to progressively keep track of the overall project outputs, outcomes, measured
against budget/expenditure or against appraisal targets (physical and financial) overtime. The information
generated would be able to inform management whether the programme is on course to achieve the
stated development objectives and goals or whether there is a need to rethink the original strategy. Table
3 measures cumulative achievement (physical and expenditure) against cumulative (plan and budget).
The result can indicate poor planning (over ambitions plan/budget) or poor implementation performance
(assuming plan/budget are realistic gauged against available implementation capacity). Table 4 has been
designed to cumulatively capture the achievements trends in physical terms (outputs/outcome) and
expenditures, measured against appraisal physical targets (output/outcome), and total cost estimates
including contingencies. The table will be set up using information contained in the project design
(appraisal report) and the AWPB cumulative achievements (Table 3). In most cases, Appraisal Targets
will be specifically defined/stated in the main Appraisal Report while, in other cases, information may be
contained in the associated Working Papers. Against the appraisal targets, the implementation
achievements will be measured, and conclusion drawn on whether the implementation is tandem or
otherwise with the appraisal targets. The objective is primarily to measure the efficiency of performance
assuming appraisal targets are realistic. Each table will be preceded by a short analysis of performance
on meeting set objectives as per appraisal report. It should be noted that apart from measuring
performance using percentage differences, it is important to also carry-out variance analysis
(physical/cost) to explain more objectively the sources of the deviations between appraisal targets and
implementation targets. Please note that variances can arise due to using more inputs to achieve an
expected output/outcome or using the same inputs as per appraisal to achieve less output/outcome as
appraisal, or due to price changes. Variance analysis is designed to reflect the source of variation found.
30
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
Table 3: Cumulative Financial and physical Progress Performance (Project Year) 1
Components/Subcomponents/Activiti Unit of AWPB AWPB % AWPB Budget for Budget % of Expecte Expected %
es Measur ((INSERT ((INSERT ((INSERT (INSERT Expenditur Budget d Outcome Outcome
e PROJEC PROJEC PROJEC PROJECT e as at Expende Outcom s s
T YEAR)) T YEAR)) T YEAR)) YEAR) (DAY/ d as at e Achieved Achieved
Target Target Target (USD/MWK MONTH/ (DAY/
Outputs Outputs Outputs ) YEAR..... MONTH/
Achieved Achieved (USD/MWK) YEAR.....
Watershed Characterisation
Activities
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
Agriculture Infrastructure
development
1. Report will be prepared annually starting fron PY2
2. Put date referring to the reporting period; it should be 30 June of PY ……
31
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
Targets: (Project Year ……………)
OUTPUTS COST/BUDGET OUTCOMES COMMENTS
1. Agriculture
Water
Resources
Development
Watershed
Characterisat
ion
Activities
XXXXXX
Improvement
of
meteorology
and
hydrology
systems
Activities
XXXXXX
Note: - Appraisal targets are to be copied from appraisal detailed cost tables.
- AWPB – Cumulative target achievements are from Table 3 as up-date for the concerned project year.
32
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
The benefits/impact and beneficiaries are reflected in the appraisal report, but can be expanded to reflect
the actual situation during implementation. The information should be qualified as much as possible,
however, sight should not be lost of qualitative benefits which are equally important. The beneficiaries
should be comprehensive, and include not only the target groups but also beneficiaries from
implementing institutions, collaborating agencies e.g. private sector/NGO service providers etc.
Beneficiaries should be disaggregated as much as possible – gender, youth, others.
33
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
The relevant RIMS indicators to be included in the programme’s M&E system should be identified and
agreed upon by the programme implementers and submitted to IFAD for no objection. Data and
information on the agreed RIMS indicators that are relevant to the programme will be captured from the
regular progress reports, monitoring/evaluation report, MTR, special studies, etc. The list of indicators
may be adjusted with time depending on the activities undertaken and completed during an
implementation period. It is important to note that RIMS indicators reported on are those related to
completed activities and not on ongoing activities however close they may be to completion. The results
and Impact Management System (RIMS) Handbook. (published February 2011) by IFAD and already
provided to the programme should be consulted for guidance.
A sample format for reporting on RIMS is provided – table 6. It is again emphasized that the format should
be reviewed and improved by the M/E team and detailed indicators as agreed by the team inserted. It is
34
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
emphasized that indicators included should be key and measurable. The RIMS report is to be produced
annually.
The following should be noted. The production of a sound RIMS report require that sound AWPB has
been prepared and in alignment with Appraisal report, progress reporting in relation to AWPB is effective,
that monitoring/evealuation system is properly functioning, and that required monitoring and evaluation
report are prepared.
35
STATE OF ERITREA
National Agricultural Project (NAP)
Progress Report Format
Table 8. RIMS REPORTING FORM
Third Level Bench Mark PY2 Mid Term MT+1 MT+2 MT+3 Completion
Results: (MT)
Impact
(i) Household with
improved assets Number
Onwership: (ii) Prevalence
of malnutrition for children
under 5 Percent
(iii) Proportion of food percent
secured poor rural
household
36
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
This is an analytical chapter, where external factors that influence the programme positive and
negative experiences and performance under the programme and the progress towards achieving
project objectives and goal are discussed. The findings in this section will form the basis for
considering strategic changes that may be required to improve performance, and will provide an input
for the next AWPB, in terms of constraints to be resolved and successful interventions that should be
given more prominence. The chapter will contain three sections namely; 4.1-External Factors; 4.2-
Internal factors and proposed solutions; and 4.3 Successful Approaches and lessons learned.
Various external factors can influence programme implementation and results and these factors may
change over time. The environment in which the programmes has operated during the past year, in
particular changes that have occurred and how these have affected implementation, should be
described here. Such factors could include:
Implementation constraints that are within the area of influence of the project and that could be
resolved under the direction of project management would be presented here. There is no limit to the
types of issues and constraints that can be listed some examples are given below:
poor quality of infrastructure works (by project staff, contractors or the community);
poor quality of services (by project staff, community-based service providers, NGOs,
technical assistance);
financial issues, such as late disbursement of funds, cash flow problems, delayed
accountability, over-expenditure, outdated allowance regulations;
problems related to other project resources, including lack of facilities or equipment,
breakdown of vehicles, malfunctioning accounting software;
inefficient or inappropriate use of project resources, such as excessive telephone usage,
inappropriate use of vehicles, inflated cost of works or services;
insufficient staff capacity, in terms of an inadequate number of people for certain tasks, or key
positions that have not been filled, or lack of knowledge and skills; and
Procurement problems.
Donor coordination.
other factors that hold back implementation of a project activity or sub-component.
Along with the listed constraints, suggestions should be made on how the constraints could be
overcome. When a certain project activity cannot be implemented, what is the best alternative use of
the funds or what can be done to unblock the activity?
-0-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
This is where the positive results of the project should be highlighted, which are often overlooked
because the constraints require so much attention. However, a shift from activities and approaches
that do not work to those that do work is actually a way to resolve certain types of constraints.
Example could include:
This is the conclusion of the Report. Based on the financial and physical progress, the analysis of
programme performance, and progress towards achieving programme outcomes and impact that has
been discussed in previous sections, where is the project heading to? What new directions, changes
in the programme strategy (methodology of production, community participation approaches, gender
and poverty targeting) and logical framework (ineffective activities or outputs) need to be considered?
Should certain activities that have proven to be ineffective be abolished or scaled down? How should
certain approaches that have not worked as expected be modified? How will inefficient use of
programme resources e.g construction of unnecessarily expensive structures be stopped? Should
certain pilot initiatives, that were not foreseen in the programme design but have had a significant
impact, be introduced. This section should aim at providing ‘food for thought’ to management.
ANNEX
In order to stimulate a more active use of the supervision reports, the recommendations table of the
reports should be included in the Progress Report with a response by programme/project
management to the recommendations, mainly in terms of description of action taken with results.
Please note that, in some cases, the programme could express disagreement with any of the
-1-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
-2-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
-3-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
-4-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
-5-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
The M&E Officer has overall responsibility for the establishment and operation of a sound M&E
system in line with the Programme’s objectives and approach. He will also be responsible for the
preparation of periodic reports of Project implementation progress. He/she reports to the Project
Office Coordinator (POC).
-6-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
The Financial Controller has responsibility for the management of Project finances including
replenishments, disbursements and financial reporting. He/she reports to the to the head of Finance
and Administration with a dotted line to NAP Coordinator for day to day NAP operations. The FC is
required to work in consultation with the Finance Unit Head under the Administration and Finance
Division of the MoA.
-7-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Reporting to the Financial Controller, the Accountant is responsible for performing the day-to-day
accounting functions.
-8-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
-9-
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
- 10 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Reporting to the Financial Controller, the cashier effects and records cash disbursements in the NPO.
- 11 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
The Project Support Officer is responsible for providing management support for the day-to-day
administrative and office functions of the Programme. He/she reports to the Project Office
Coordinator (POC).
- 12 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
- 13 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Duty Station: The six Zoba capitals with frequent travel throughout the Project area.
- 14 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Reporting directly to the ZPC, the Deputy Zoba Project Coordinator (ZDPC) assists the ZPC with the
preparation and submission of the consolidated AWPB and periodic reports of the Programme.
Duty Station: The six Zoba capitals with frequent travel throughout the Project area.
- 15 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Reporting directly to the ZPC, the Planning Officer (PO) supervises and coordinates the planning
functions and activities of the Programme.
(a) Supervising and guiding the preparation of the AWPB by the Project coordination offices and
implementing agencies;
(b) Preparing the consolidated AWPB of the Project in accordance with the timeframe agreed for
the planning process;
(c) Guiding the planning process to ensure that the AWPB are prepared following the
participatory planning approach of the Project;
(d) Providing technical support including training on planning to implementing agencies operating
within the Zoba;
(e) In collaboration with Planning Officer at the NPO, reviewing progress made in implementation
and proposing amendments required with respect to Project components and activities for
consideration by the ZPCC;
(f) Monitoring implementation of Project activities to ensure that they are in line with the AWPB;
(g) Assisting subject matter specialists in the preparation and appraisal of projects to be financed
by the Project;
(h) Providing support to external reviews and evaluations of the Project;
(i) Preparing periodic reports on planning activities of the Project;
(j) Any other duties (related to NAP activities) as may be assigned by the PC.
Duty Station: The six Zoba capitals with frequent travel throughout the Project area.
- 16 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Reporting directly to the Zoba PC, the M&E Officer ensures the smooth operation of the M&E system
established for the Project. The M&E officer co-ordinates with implementing bodies and other
agencies to ensure that verifiable data is supplied, analyzed and reported.
Duty Station: The six Zoba capitals with regular travel throughout the Project area.
- 17 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
- 18 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Reporting to the Financial Controller, the Accountant is responsible for performing the day-to-day
accounting functions of the Project.
- 19 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Working under the Administration and Finance Department of the Zoba admnsitration, the
Procurement Officer is responsible for overseeing all Zoba level procurements under the Project.
- 20 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Reporting to the Zoba Financial Controller, the cashier effects and records cash disbursements in the
ZPCO.
- 21 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Zoba Secretary
The Secretary is answerable to the Zoba Project Coordinator and is responsible for providing
secretarial support to the ZPCO.
- 22 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
In addition to these members, the NPO and ZPCOs are to be assisted by subject matter specialists
seconded to the Project by their respective departments (AED, RSD and NARI) to assure the
provision of technical backstopping to the Project. The Subject Matter Specialists, as individuals or
under the umbrella of their respective departments, will be requested by the NPO and ZPCOs to
provide technical backstopping. These subject matter specialists consist of:
Livestock development expert;
Dairy development expert;
Beekeeping and poultry development expert;
Irrigation development expert;
Seed expert;
Seed Breeder;
Regulatory service expert;
Extension experts.
Duties and responsibilities of the Subject Matter Specialists, in general terms, are:
(a) Contribute to the preparation of AWPB for the Project;
(b) Prepare project proposals to be financed by the Project;
(c) Assist Zoba staff screen proposals forwarded by MoA sub-zoba offices in order to
assess their technical and financial feasibility and, where necessary, propose
modifications.
(d) Provide training and TOT to Zoba-based subject matter specialists and sub-zoba
based intermediate extension officers.
(e) Develop and/or adapt appropriate technical packages and preparation of extension
manuals, pamphlets and videos.
(f) Preparation of curriculum and training of Zoba-based MOA staff in technical
packages and their dissemination.
(g) Monitor and supervise the works and performance of Zoba-based subject matter
specialists and intermediate extension officers.
(h) Provide rapid response to field problems as and when they arise, and
(i) Prepare required reports on Project implementation and achievements.
It should be noted that at the Zoba and Sub-Zoba levels, the subject matter specialists will assure the
linkage and coordination between the Project Facilitation process and the planning of Project
interventions under the MoA offices.
- 23 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Total
Cash Payments per Expenditure Category
Civil Works
Vehicles, Motorcycles, Equipment
and Materials
Agricultural and Livestock Inputs
Technical Assistance, Training
Workshops and Studies
Recurrent costs- operations and
maintenance
- 24 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
WA submitted to IFAD
WA WA
WA n.. WA n.. n.. n.. Total
Category Category Description
I. Civil Works xx xx xx xx xx
II. Vehicles, Motorcycles, Equipment and
Materials
xx xx xx xx xx
III. Agricultural and Livestock Inputs
xx xx xx xx xx
IV. Technical Assistance, Training
Workshops and Studies
xx xx xx xx xx
V. Recurrent costs- operations and
maintenance
xx xx xx xx xx
Total xx xx xx xx xx
In USD equiv/ xx xx xx xx xx
Rejected from IFAD xx xx xx xx xx
Net Reimbursed xx xx xx xx
I. Civil Works xx xx xx xx
Total xx xx xx xx
Withdrawal applications are submitted for reimbursement to IFAD using the historical exchange rate of the transfers
to the Operating Account.
Expenditures partially or totally rejected by IFAD (if any) should be detailed here.
This statement should be reconciled with the Statement of Receipts and Payments
- 25 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
- 26 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Disbursement Contract Contract Contract Supplier/ Contract Total Total Total Total Undisbursed
Contract Contract Disbursed on Amount
Category Description Start End Contractor No. Value Amount
Invoiced to Contract
Name
date
Description
I. Civil Works
II. Vehicles, Motorcycles,
Equipment and Materials
III. Agricultural and Livestock
Inputs
IV. Technical Assistance, Training
Workshops and Studies
V. Recurrent costs- operations
and maintenance
Total
- 27 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
- 28 -
Annex IX A: Petty Cash Request Form
Name
Signature
¤ Reimbursement
¤ Advance
TOTAL AMOUNT*
Difference (G = E – F) ______________
Explanation Of
Difference________________________________________________________________________
_
__________________________________________________________________________
bank notes
500
1 000
2 000
coins
10
20
50
- 30 -
Annex X A: Vehicle Log
Description of Garage Cost Description Garage Cost Type Period Cost Checked Cost
repair of service covered by
Report accidents in the space below, providing all relevant details for each occurrence:
Date:
Place:
Name of driver:
Circumstances:
Damage to PIU vehicle:
Damage to other vehicles:
Injuries (indicate name of victims and describe injuries):
Insurance settlement:
- 32 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
The following are the terms of reference (‘ToR’) on which the MOA agrees to engage audit firm ‘the
Auditor’ to perform an Audit and to report in connection with the Agreement with the International
Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) concerning the NAP where in these ToRs the
‘Contracting Authority’ is mentioned this refers to IFAD which has signed the Agreement with the
GOE and finances the services. The Contracting Authority is not a party to this engagement.
1.1 Responsibilities of the Parties to the Engagement
Recipient/Borrower refers to the entity that provides the services and that has signed the Agreement
with the Contracting Authority.
The NPO is responsible for providing a Financial Statements for the services financed by the
Loan/ Grant and for ensuring that these Financial Statements can be properly reconciled to
the NPO records and accounts in respect of these services.
The NPO accepts that the ability of the Auditor to perform the procedures required by this
engagement effectively depends upon the NPO providing full and free access to its staff and
records and accounts.
The NPO shall provide the auditors with all the necessary documentation to perform the
assignment properly; in particular the following information shall be provided to the auditors
before the beginning of the assignment:
a) Project Agreement;
b) Annual Progress Report;
c) Project Implementation Manual;
d) Financial Management Manual;
e) Organizational charts along with names and titles of senior managers;
f) Names and qualifications of officers responsible for financial management,
accounting and internal audit.
g) Description of information technology facilities and computer systems in use and
h) Copies of the minutes of negotiations, the project design document, the annual work
programme and budget and the letter to the borrower if available.
‘The Auditor’ refers to the Auditor who is responsible for performing the agreed-upon procedures as
specified in these ToR, and for submitting a report of factual findings to the NPO/moa
The Auditor shall provide:
A separate opinion on Project Financial Statements (PFS)
a) Yearly and cumulative statements of sources and application of funds, which should
disclose separately IFAD’s funds, other donors funds and beneficiaries funds;
b) Statement of sources and application of funds.
c) Yearly and cumulative SOEs by withdrawal application and category of expenditures;
reconciliation of the SA.
d) Reconciliation between the amounts shown as received by the project and those shown
as being disbursed by IFAD should be attached as an annex to the PFS. As part of that
reconciliation the auditor will indicate the procedure used for disbursement (SA funds,
letters of credit, special commitments, reimbursement or direct payment) and indicate
- 33 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
A separate management letter addressing the adequacy of the accounting and internal
control systems of the Programme, including compliance with IFAD’s Procurement
Guidelines and such other matters as IFAD may notify the NPO to include in the audit.
The auditor is requested to:
- 34 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
The subject of this engagement is the audit of the financial statements of the year’s 20XX, 20XY, and
20XV for the IFAD Grant. The information, both financial and non-financial, which is subject to
verification by the Auditor, is all information which makes it possible to verify that the expenditures
claimed by the NPO in Financial statements have occurred, and are accurate and eligible.
1.3 Reason for the Engagement
The NPO Service Provider is required to submit to the Contracting Authority an Audit report
produced by an external auditor.
This constitutes an engagement to perform specific agreed-upon procedures following the IFAD
Guidelines on Project Audits provided to the Auditors by the NPO in Annex 1 of these TOR. The
objective of this audit is for the Auditor to verify that the expenditures claimed by the NPO in the
financial statements for the services covered by the Agreement have occurred (‘reality’), are accurate
(‘exact’) and eligible and to submit to the PSMU/MOA a report of factual findings with regard to the
agreed-upon procedures performed. Eligibility means that expenditure have been incurred in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
1.5.1 The Auditor shall undertake this engagement in accordance with these Terms of Reference
and:
- in accordance with the International Standard on Audit (ISA) to perform Agreed-upon Procedures
regarding Financial Information as promulgated by the IFAC;
- In compliance with the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants issued by the IFAC. Although
ISRS 4400 provides that independence is not a requirement for agreed-upon procedures
engagements, the Contracting Authority requires that the auditor also complies with the
independence requirements of the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants.
- In accordance with International Standards on Auditing and in line with IFAD’s Guidelines for
Project Audits.
- 35 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
The report on this audit should describe the purpose and the agreed-upon procedures of the
engagement in sufficient detail in order to enable the PSMU/MOA and the Contracting Authority to
understand the nature and extent of the procedures performed by the Auditor. Use of the financial
and audit reporting is compulsory.
1.6.1 Periods covered
The reports on this audit should cover the following:
a) IFAD Grant NO I-DSF-8107-ER for the years 20XX
Reports covering items a must be delivered no later than 120 calendar days as of the date of signing
the agreement.
Reports covering items b and c must be delivered within months after the end of the respective fiscal
year .
- 36 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
IFAD Financing No. ---- WA No. --- Reporting period [from --- to ---]
Remarks:
____________________ _____________________
Prepared by: Project Accountant/Financial Controller Certified by: Project Director
Dated: ____________________ Dated: _____________________
- 37 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Cumulative
Notes 20XX 20XX to date
ERN ERN ERN
Balance B/F 4 XXX XXX
FINANCING
PROJECT EXPENDITURES:
(BY CATEGORY OF EXPENDITURES)
IFAD Financed
Government Funds
I. Civil Works 9 XXX XXX XXX
II. Vehicles, Motorcycles, Equipment and XXX XXX XXX
Materials
III. Agricultural and Livestock Inputs XXX XXX XXX
IV. Technical Assistance, Training XXX XXX XXX
Workshops and
V. Recurrent costs- operations and XXX XXX XXX
maintenance
XXX XXX XXX
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES XXX XXX XXX
- 38 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Cumulative
Notes 201X 201X-1 to date
ERN ERN ERN
Balance B/F 4 XXX XXX
FINANCING
PROJECT EXPENDITURES:
(BY COMPONENT OF EXPENDITURES)
IFAD Financed
- 39 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
FINANCING
IFAD Credit
Replenishments to SA XXX XXX XXX
IFAD Direct Payments XXX XXX XXX
Government Funds XXX XXX XXX
PROJECT EXPENDITURES:
(BY CATEGORY OF EXPENDITURES)
Government Funds
I. Civil Works 9 XXX XXX XXX
II. Vehicles, Motorcycles, XXX XXX XXX
Equipment and Materials
III. Agricultural and Livestock XXX XXX XXX
Inputs
IV. Technical Assistance, Training XXX XXX XXX
Workshops and
V. Recurrent costs- operations and XXX XXX XXX
maintenance
XXX XXX XXX
TOTAL PROJECT
EXPENDITURES XXX XXX XXX
- 40 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
USD ERN
Opening Balance Notes
XXX XXX
Add:
IFAD Replenishments:
Date WA No XXX
Date WA No XXX
XXX XXX XXX
Bank Interests XXX XXX
Total XXX XXX
Deduct:
Transfers to Operating Accounts:
Date XXX
Date XXX
XXX XXX XXX
- 41 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
- 42 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
- 43 -
Eritrea : National Agricultural Project (NAP)
STATEMENT OF DESIGNATED ACCOUNT RECONCILIATION
Account No: ___________
Bank: ________________
Address:_______________
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
USD ERN
Project Implementation Manual (PIM)
Notes
1 Initial Deposit Eritrea : National Agricultural Project (NAP))
XXXX XXXX
SOEs-WITHDRAWAL
2 Less amount(s) recovered: APPLICATION STATEMENT
XXXX XXXX
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 201X
3 Outstanding Amount advanced XXXX XXXX
by Category of Expenditures in Local Currency
Represented by: Rejected
Category
Special Account Balance as at Category In USD from Net
Notes description description Total Equivalent IFAD Reimbursed
4 31/12/201X XXXX XXXX
Cat
No 1
Plus amounts
WA claimed but not yet
5 creditedNo:
as at 30/6/201X:
WA XXX XXX XXX Date
XXX XXX XXX XXX
WA XXX XXX XXX Date
XXX XXX XXX XXX
XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
XXXX XXXXXXX
XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
Plus amounts
Total withdrawn
not yet XXX
claimed,WAcomposed
Pending of: for Submission:
WA
No:
Was Prepared XXX
not yet submitted:XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
WA XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
WA XXX XXX
TOTAL XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
Withdrawal Applications are submitted for reimbursement to IFAD using the historical
WAs not yet prepared: XXX
exchange rate of the transfers to the Operating Account. Expenditures partially or totally
rejected by IFAD (if any) should be detailed here. This statement should be reconciled
Total
with theamount withdrawn
Statement not yetand Payments.
of Receipts
6 claimed XXXX XXXX
A Basis of Preparation: The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) with particular emphasis on Cash Basis
Financial Reporting under the Cash Basis of Accounting
- 44 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
B Cash Basis of Accounting: The cash basis of accounting recognizes transactions and events
only when cash is received or paid by the entity.
C. Foreign Currency Transactions: Foreign currency translation for the income and expenditure
account items are converted using the actual historic exchange rate at the conversion from
designated to local account. Where part of the expenditures has to be met from the proceeds of
subsequent draw downs from designated to local account, this is done on First in First out (FIFO)
basis. All local expenditures paid from the local accounts/currency are translated back to the USD
at the actual rate used for the transfer from designated to local account. Cash balances held in
foreign currency are reported using the closing rate. Gains/Losses on foreign currency
transactions/balances are dealt within the Statement of Designated Account Activities.
3 BUDGET:
The budget is developed on the same accounting basis (cash basis), same classification and for the
same period as the financial statements. Material variances (above XXX) have been explained as
notes to the financial statements
4 DIRECT PAYMENTS
These payments were made directly by IFAD from the Loan/Grant account to the specified
supplier/service provider in accordance with the terms and conditions of the financing Agreement
Include here details of direct payments
WA, Date, currency and amount received, amount in local currency
4. CASH/FUND BALANCES
Reconciliation
201X 201X-1
ERN ERN
Analyses of aging of advances to be included detailing and providing reasons for long
outstanding advances
- 45 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
200X 200X-1
ERN ERN
200X 200X-1
ERN ERN
This schedule includes all assets acquired from the commencement of the Project.
These assets are stated at cost. Existence and beneficial ownership to be verified by
the auditors. Apart of the summary schedule, details schedules for yearly changes to
be included.
- 46 -
State of Eritrea: National Agriculture Project (NAP)
Available
Allocated Disbursed Balance
Reconciliation here
- 47 -