Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Study #5 On Putex Corporation: Corporate Planning Process
Case Study #5 On Putex Corporation: Corporate Planning Process
CASE STUDY #5 ON
It was early morning of Monday, March 24, 2014, Gupta was driving to his office located on outskirts
of the city. His mind was totally occupied with the events that were to take place later in the day and
might have repercussion on the future of the company and challenges ahead.
Gupta and Singh, young executives of a leading automotive component manufacturing company
Putex Corporation in collaboration with a global automotive component MNC, were quite excited
after Rajesh, Chief Operating Officer (COO), gave his final approval, to the five year corporate plan
and annual budget for the company, a 500 page detailed document, compiled by them as their first
assignment, after multiple iterations. The basic inputs were given by each department based on
general guidelines discussed and current year’s projected data as was the practice followed over the
years. The company followed a very meticulous five year planning and budgeting process, it had
adapted from the collaborator, which began with sales forecast prepared by marketing department in
November each year and ended with the approval of the five year corporate plan and budget for the
next year by the Advisory Committee in February of the next year, well in time for the next financial
year beginning from first day of April. They got ten photocopy sets of the document made for
submitting to the Advisory Committee consisting of the Group Chairman and Managing Directors and
General Managers of all the group companies including Rajesh, COO, of their own company. The
formal presentation to the advisory committee was to take place next day in a five star hotel in the
city. They were eagerly looking forward to the presentation. Next day, as planned, all advisory
committee members were present and also the Chairman of the group.
A group of about 40 top and senior level executives from all the group companies attended the
Management Conference, as it was called. Gupta and Singh started to make their first presentation to
the top management on the five year corporate plan and the budget for the next year. It seemed simple
as the COO had given general guidance for preparing the plan as 10 percent increase per year in sales
and adjust the other factors in the same ratio except the manpower. Both were a bit nervous. On Sales
presentation Sinha, Managing Director of a group company and a member of Advisory Committee
asked, “You are showing last year sales quantity of product Lube Filter for the Korean Car Company
as 4000 and projected 4400 for this year. What is the basis of arriving at this figure?”. “We have made
an assumption of 10 percent growth in sales this year.” was the answer. “The turnover was estimated
as INR1 4500 million for the current finacial year, we have planned it to increase to INR 4950 million
in the next year. The profit also goes up by 10 percent”, they said with a lot of confidence. But who
told you to take 10 percent growth, when Korean Car Company is commencing production of 50,000
vehicles per annum this year from their new plant in South?” There was a chilling silence in the room
that followed. Gupta and Singh has no clue of this information. The COO was watching the
discussions with keen interest as a member of the advisory committee on the other side of the table.
The committee asked Gupta and Singh to take a relook at the five year plan and the budget for the
next year. Both left the room quietly after promising to come back with modified plan within next 30
days.
The overall growth for automotive components for 2013-14 had been projected at 4.7 percent . A few
studies however put this growth at 11percent . “Overall, the growth would be flat this year,” said
Lakshman, president, ACMA5 . According to an industry expert Khan, Auto Parts Turnover Drops
First Time in Fiscal 20146. As per the statistics published by ACMA, engine parts form the largest
segment (31 per cent) of auto part industry followed by drive transmission and steering parts (19 per
cent). Suspension & braking parts and body & chassis account for 12 per cent each in the entire
product range, followed by equipment accounting for 10 per cent of the same . The auto components
industry’s turnover had grown at a CAGR of 14.6 per cent during 2007-11. ACMA and D&B
Research estimated the industry to grow at a CAGR of 11 percent during 2011-20217. Though there
were a large number of manufacturers for each automotive component, there were only a few leading
suppliers for filtration systems and engine components with well-known brands. These were preferred
suppliers due to quality and reliability of their products and were OEM suppliers for companies in US
and Europe. These suppliers were readily accepted by the Indian companies, which were either
wholly owned subsidiaries of the parent company or in technical or financial collaboration with the
big automotive companies. As per industry estimates, Indian auto component industry derived 60 per
cent of its turnover from sales to domestic original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), 25 per cent
from sales to the domestic replacement market and around 15 per cent from exports. Putex
Corporation was present in all the segments.
The sales to aftermarket, other than OEMs and large customers was handled by a group marketing
company. Putex Corporation in which Gupta and Singh were working had a significant market share
due to high level of technology and high quality and relatively efficient operations. The competition
for similar products was quite fierce amongst the key suppliers due need for high investments mande
in setting up the design and manufacturing facilities and limitation of local technology. Leading
automotive companies had their Joint Venture companies or wholly owned subsidiaries, with limited
capacities, supplying these parts as captive units. Putex Corporation was supplying to almost all
OEMs in Automotive (Cars and Heavy Commercial Vehicles, Scooters and Motorcycles), Industrial,
Tractor, Earthmoving and other sectors. They were also exporting to nearby countries and also to
Europe. All the leading car manufacturers were having their assembly plants in India. The commercial
vehicles were manufactured by Telco and Ashok Leyland. Escorts, Eicher, TAFE, Ferguson etc. were
leading tractor manufacturers. Two wheeler and three wheeler manufacturers were Bajaj, Hero Group,
Honda, TVS, Yamaha etc ( see exhibit 1 for OEM customers of Putex) .
ORGANIZATION CULTURE
The plant was managed by Gupta as Plant Head reporting to Mahesh, a hardworking General
Manager. Rajesh was now looking after all the operations of the company as new COO. Ravi, a
pleasant, happy go lucky person, was head marketing reporting to Rajesh and also to the Chairman.
The Chairman’s office was in the nearby premises as the company plant and other offices. The
company had a culture of putting trust in their employees and delegating full responsibility and
authority at all levels. All employees including senior managers were expected to carry out all the
work as per their respective roles, all by themselves, as per the need of the situation. No one was
needed to supervise them or ask them to explain about the decisions they had taken. Even the
Chairman had never over ruled any decision taken by a manager. Each manager was given best
possible facilities at par with leading MNCs such as travel by air, stay in five star hotel, and claim
actual expenses with very liberal limits. The company had opened schools for employee’s children
near plants located in remote locations. They had also started a small hospital for taking care of the
employee’s families. Chairman joined the managers and staff during his visits to each location
followed by cocktails and dinner sponsord by the company.
Due to unusually harsh comments from the Advisory Committee, the top management of the company sat
down to take a relook at the five year plan and the budget for the next year (refer exhibit 4 for 5 year plan
of Putex Corporation) . Management had inducted Rajesh a senior retired government officer as COO of
this company. Rajesh, who had just joined initially preferred to follow company’s established practice.
However after the above incident, he took over the responsibility to relook at the five year plan and the
budget for the next year. He decided that rather than going ahead with the usual approach of updating the
current year’s projected figures for each department and function, start the process from a zero base. He
called this approach as Zero Base Budgeting. Everyone took this new approach with a pich of salt and as a
passing phase as never in the past anyone had questioned the basis for preparing a budget. However,
Rajesh, stood to his stand and made all executives prepare their estimates from scratch, questioning the
assumptions made by each one of them. Sales plan was the first to be revised, followed by budget for each
activity. This was rather difficult process, as no one had ever thought in this direction. After gruelling long
meetings, the final version of the five year plan and the annual budget was complied. The initial sales
budget for next year was modified from INR 4950 million to INR 5500 million. This too was turned down
by the Advisory Committee. After days of reworking and series of presentations, Advisory Committee
accepted a final Sales Plan of INR 6075 million including INR 500 million from the diversification
projects for the next year (a massive 35 percent increase in annual plan for the next year and an average of
26.5 percent over next 5 years!). Rajesh was a very seasoned professional and therefore did not show any
emotions. The Chairman looked at the team with a usual smile. Gupta and Singh were quite worried as
to what would be the impact of this.
EXHIBIT 1 : OEM CUSTOMERS OF PUTEX CORPORATION
Ashok Leyland Royal Enfield
Bajaj Auto Ltd. Swaraj Isuzu
Caterpillar TAFE
Daimler India Commercial Vehicles Tata Motors
Escorts Toyota Kirloskar
Ford India TVS Motors
Force Motors Volvo Eicher Commercial Vehicle
Fiat India Volvo Trucks
General Motors Yamaha Motors
Harley Davidson Mahindra Navistar
Hero Motor Corp. MAN Force
Honda Siel Cars India Maruti Suzuki
International Cars & Motor Ltd. Nissan
Ingersoll Rand Nissan Ashok Leyland
Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited Mitsubishi
Mahindra & Mahindra New Holland Tractors
Piaggio Vehicles Punjab Tractors