Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Acoustics - Knowledge Booklet
Acoustics - Knowledge Booklet
Knowledge booklet
Testing Knowledge Base
compilation
https://community.plm.automation.siemens.com/
Unrestricted
1
The content in this booklet and the Siemens PLM Community site
is the hard work and dedication of many individuals.
Table of Contents
What is the acoustic quantity called Q? ....................................................................................................... 2
Sound Pressure, Sound Power, and Sound Intensity: What’s the difference? ............................................. 8
Sound Transmission Loss ............................................................................................................................ 13
What is Sound Power? ................................................................................................................................ 25
Sound Absorption ....................................................................................................................................... 33
Noise Level Certification: how to select the right standard?...................................................................... 49
Octaves in Human Hearing ......................................................................................................................... 53
Basics: What is a decibel (dB) anyway? Why is it used? ............................................................................. 63
Sound Fields: Free versus Diffuse Field, Near versus Far Field ................................................................... 68
Sound Pressure ........................................................................................................................................... 74
What is A-weighting? .................................................................................................................................. 78
All Articles - Siemens PLM Community Testing Knowledge Base ............................................................... 86
Unrestricted
2
For a mechanical system, Newton's Second Law of motion is F=ma. F is the force input
into the system, a (acceleration) is the acceleration response output, and m is the mass.
For an acoustic system, the Volume Acceleration (Q) is equivalent to the force in a
mechanical system, and sound pressure (P) is the equivalent to the acceleration output
response.
Unrestricted
3
Volume Acceleration
At first, it may not be intuitive how “VolumeAcceleration” is equivalent to acoustic force.
The easiest way to visualize “VolumeAcceleration” is to think of it as Area (m2) multiplied
by Acceleration (m/s2)
If one visualizes a speaker, imagine dividing the speaker surface areas into a series of
small areas. In the center of each area, place an accelerometer. The total acoustic force
that the speaker produces would be the sum of individual areas times their respective
accelerations.
In practice, one must divide the surface into smaller and smaller areas as the desired
frequency for analysis increases.
In other words, the higher the frequency, the smaller the area patches. This is due to
the change in the wavelength of sound.
Unrestricted
4
Mid-High Frequency Q-source: The tip of the nozzle is where a calibrated Q is generated.
Putting the Q-source at the acoustic response location of interest, and accelerometers on
the mount attachment locations, the measurement is performed at one time.
Both P/F and A/Q reduce to the same units of 1/m2, making them equivalent.
Unrestricted
5
The source output of the SCADAS is connected to the Q-source via an amplifier. The output of the Q-source is fed into
a SCADAS data channel.
Much of the information to fill in comes from the Q-source calibration sheet.
Unrestricted
6
Q-source calibration sheet shows necessary information to use with now Simcenter Testlab.
The source can be setup as random in "Scope" worksheet of Simcenter Testlab Spectral
Acquisition.
And select "FRF" as the measurement to save in the "Test Setup" worksheet of Simcenter
Testlab Spectral Acquisition.
In the Simcenter Testlab "Test Setup" worksheet, check on "Measure" and "Save" under the FRF tab.
After performing the measurement, and viewing the FRF in a display, the FRF can be
viewed as P/F rather than A/Q by right clicking on the Y-axis and selecting "Unit".
Unrestricted
7
Note: Even though the Q-source outputs Volume Acceleration, sometimes the sources
are referred to as Volume Velocity sources.
Unrestricted
8
These three terms all measure different aspects of sound, but can all be expressed
in decibels as shown in Figure 1. A decibel is not unit of measure, but rather a
logarithmic ratio between two numbers (a measured quantity and a reference number).
Figure 1: Sound pressure, sound power and sound intensity can all be expressed in decibels (dB) even though they
represent different measured quantities.
Unrestricted
9
The measurement units used in sound pressure, sound power, and sound intensity are
different. Often the measurement unit is omitted during discussions, and only the term
“decibels” is used. This can cause some confusion to arise.
Figure 2: Heater analogy for Sound Pressure, Sound Intensity and Sound Power
An analogy between a heater placed in a cold room, versus a sound emitting object in
quiet room, can be used to illustrate the differences between pressure, power and
intensity. There are several similarities between heat and sound as shown in Figure 2.
The heater creates heat, which spreads throughout the room. A noise emitting object
creates sound in a similar fashion. The following parallels can be drawn:
Unrestricted
10
*** In this analogy, it was assumed that both the heater and sound emitting object have a
constant output. The room was assumed to be free of reflections and other sources. ***
The particle velocity is the speed of which the air molecules vibrate back and forth while
transmitting a sound. Particle velocity is a vector quantity, while sound pressure is only a
scalar amplitude. The result is that sound intensity is a vector quantity.
At any given location around a sound source, either the sound intensity or sound
pressure can be measured, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Sound Intensity (left) versus Sound Pressure (right) around an electric motor
The sound intensity (left side) shows both amplitude (via color) and direction (with a
vector arrow). The sound pressure (right side) shows only amplitude with color:
Unrestricted
11
Amplitudes the Same - Looking at the color distribution of sound intensity and
sound pressure amplitude levels, the same pattern is present in both images.
Direction is the Difference - The sound intensity vectors on the left side of Figure
3 clearly indicate the direction of sound flow, making it easier to troubleshoot the
cause of the high sound levels. The sound pressure values on the right side do not
indicate flow direction or provide clues as to where the sound originated.
Sound pressure level can be measured with a single microphone, while sound intensity
is a more complicated measurement. A sound intensity measurement requires two or
more microphones in a specific arrangement. For example, the Simcenter
Soundbrush uses four microphones in a tetrahedral pattern to measure intensity.
Multiply the sound intensity value by the area (in m^2) covered by the measurement to
calculate sound power.
In an acoustic free field, the sound intensity at a specific distance from a sound emitting
object can be calculated, if the sound power of the object is known. Take a printer that
has a sound power of 0.02 Watts. Sound intensity will be measured in a 2-meter hemi-
sphere around the printer as shown in Figure 4.
Unrestricted
12
To get the sound intensity, divide the sound power by the area of the hemi-sphere:
Reference value for intensity (10e-12 W/m^2 from Figure 1) for Wref
Sound intensity of 0.0008 W/m^2 for W
Conclusion
Sound pressure, sound power, and sound intensity are acoustic quantities that can be
expressed in decibels. They describe different aspects of sound, and the decibels for
each represent different measurement quantities.
Unrestricted
13
Unrestricted
14
Sound transmission loss can be defined as a ratio of the sound energy transmitted
through a treatment versus the amount of sound energy on the incident side of the
material.
Equation 1: where W_i is the incident sound power, W_t is the transmitted sound power. These quantities are
pictorially represented in Figure 1 above.
Figure 2: Sound transmission loss as a function of frequency. At 2050Hz, the acoustic absorber reduces the incident
energy by 10dB. The data used in this plot was calculated using the matrix method on a muffler.
For example, in the plot above, it is clear that the transmission loss value is highly
dependent on frequency. At 2050Hz, the muffler reduces the incident energy by 10dB
(green dotted line). However, at 3500Hz, the muffler does not reduce the incident
energy at all (purple dotted line).
Unrestricted
15
In the figure below, transmission loss is plotted for three scenarios: the square panel
being completely covered by acoustic material, 3% of the panel remaining exposed, and
25% of the panel remaining exposed.
Figure 3: When the area of the acoustic material does not completely cover an object, the sound transmission loss
decreases.
Notice that even with a small area of exposure (just 3%), the transmission loss can
decrease dramatically. Increasing the size of the exposure (even as large as 25%) does
not have as great of an effect as introducing a small initial hole. The effects are
especially notable at higher frequencies.
In the figure below, transmission loss is plotted for three scenarios: full coverage, a small
1% leak, and a larger 5% leak.
Unrestricted
16
Figure 4: Introducing leaks and holes in the acoustic barrier reduces transmission loss, especially at higher
frequencies.
It is important to recognize that even small holes and small areas of missing coverage
can greatly reduce the transmission loss of a barrier. As the hole gets larger, the effect is
not as dramatic as introducing that first initial hole. This is especially apparent at higher
frequencies.
Applications and Measurements
Sound transmission loss can be a good metric for benchmarking the acoustic
performance of products.
Common testing applications include:
Knowing the sound transmission loss helps to determine and improve acoustic
properties of materials.
There are two major methods for determining STL:
Transmission loss is independent of the source meaning that STL can be measured using
a source such as a loudspeaker (it does not need to be measured in-situ).
Unrestricted
17
One end of the tube is connected to a sound source which outputs a broadband range of
sound waves. The element to be tested is mounted in the middle of the tube. The sound
waves approaching the sample are direct incidence and normal to the sample.
Figure 5: Top: Impedance tube. Bottom: Side view of impedance tube to show sample location in the tube.
Care must be taken to ensure a tight connection between the sample and the tube. For
example, if testing a muffler, there must be a tight connection between the outlet of the
first tube and the inlet of the muffler as well as the outlet of the muffler and the inlet of
the second tube.
Figure 6: The engineer ensures a tight fit between the ends of the muffler and the ends of the impedance tube.
Unrestricted
18
NOTE: Conical adaptors may be used to account for a difference in diameter between
the sample outlets and the impedance tube diameter. Conical adaptor corrections can be
factored in using Simcenter Testlab.
There are a few methods to determine STL in an impedance tube. Simcenter Testlab uses
the four-microphone transfer matrix method which assumes a lumped parameter model
of a 3D acoustic cavity.
Unrestricted
19
In this equation set, p1, v1, p2, and v2 can be measured. The unknowns are T11, T12,
T21, and T22. Because there are four unknowns and two equations, there must be two
different loading conditions to create four equations to solve for the four unknowns.
To get the two different conditions, it is possible to either run the test under two loading
conditions or change the source location between test runs.
The two-load method is recommended over the two sources method because:
Typically, the two loading conditions are a rigid termination and an anechoic
termination.
Figure 8: The result of a sound transmission loss test in tube is the sound transmission loss of the material vs.
frequency.
Unrestricted
20
The above figure is taken from the Simcenter Testlab Sound Transmission Loss
Measurement Using Impedance Tubesoftware.
Room methods
It is also possible to calculate sound transmission loss using the two-room method. This
method is most appropriate for larger samples and even complete components like
doors, windows, and vehicle components like a dash panel.
Using this technique, the engineer not only learns the overall Sound Transmission Loss
of the component but also gains insight as to where most of the noise is coming through
the component. The intensity testing will result in an intensity map of the product in
which transmission paths are highlighted as well as a plot of STL vs frequency.
In the reverberant room, an omnidirectional source is used to create a diffuse field. The
anechoic room is used to create a free-field condition to avoid any reflections that would
show up as incorrect localization spots. The material sample is placed between the two
rooms.
In the anechoic room, the sound intensity can be measured either using a sound
intensity probe or the Simcenter Soundbrush.
Unrestricted
21
Figure 9: Rooms setup for a sound transmission loss test using intensity.
When measuring STL using the two-room intensity method, Equation 1 can be modified
such that STL is calculated as follows:
Equation 2: where L_Pi is the incident soun pressure, L_It is the intensity measured on the material sample in the
anechoic chamber, S_i is the area incident, S_t is the area transmitted, and 6.18 is a constant accounting for a few
things like air density and speed of sound.
A common automotive STL application with this technique is measuring a vehicle dash
panel as seen in Figure 10, below.
Unrestricted
22
Figure 10: A sample being measured using the two-room intensity method. The sample is mounted between a
reverberant room and anechoic room.
An intensity map of the dash panel can be created with the resultant data which lends
information as to where the leaks are.
Figure 11: The intensity map of the object can be viewed to learn which locations are transmitting the most sound.
Unrestricted
23
Figure 12: The sound transmission loss can be viewed on a per-octave basis.
The intensity method is common for investigating dash panel, doors, and instrument
panels.
Figure 13: Setup for measuring sound transmission loss using two reverberant rooms.
Unrestricted
24
Sound Transmission Loss (STL) is calculated as a pressure difference between the rooms
with a correction for the receiving room.
Equation 3: where L_1 is the average SPL in the sending room, L_2 is the average SPL in the receiving room, S is the
test object area and A is the equivalent sound absorption (A = 0.16V/T) where V = receiving room volume and T =
reverberation time of the receiving room.
Figure 14: A material sample is being prepared to be inserted in the opening between the two rooms.
Again, with this method the sound transmission loss is measured versus frequency. An
example of the results sheet in Simcenter Testlab from the two-room method is below.
Figure 15: The result of a sound transmission loss test using the two-room method.
It is possible to do this testing with Simcenter Testlab Sound Transmission Loss Testing
using Rooms software.
Unrestricted
25
To measure how loud the speaker sound is, one might believe it is as simple as placing a
microphone close to the object and measuring the decibel level as shown in Picture 2.
Unrestricted
26
But where to place the microphone? How far away? The further distance a microphone
is away from a sound emitting object, the lower the decibel value will be
(Picture 3). Distance certainly affects the sound readings.
Picture3: Sound measurement microphones located 1 meter and 2 meters away from speakers
In fact, in an acoustic free field, the sound pressure level drops by 6 dB as the distance
from the sound emitting object is doubled. Going from 1 meter to 2 meters away would
decrease by 6 dB. If a product had a requirement to be 50 dB, but the microphone
distance was not specified, one could simply place the microphone far enough away to
meet the requirement!
Even if microphones were placed at the same distance away, the decibel reading could
vary depending on the location relative to the object, as shown in Picture 4.
Unrestricted
27
Picture 4: Sound measurement microphones at the same distance from sound emitting object, but at different
distances.
A microphone placed behind the speakers will not read the same decibel level as a
microphone placed in front of the speakers.
How can one quantify how loud an object is, but independent of the distance or location
of the microphone? The answer is Sound Power.
Picture 5: Hemi-sphere arrangement of microphones around test object, above a reflecting plane. Left: Drawing with
red dots representing microphone locations. Right: Actual sound power test system.
For example, the microphones might be placed around the object in hemi-sphere, to
capture all the sound emitted by the object in all directions. By taking an energy
Unrestricted
28
To normalize the microphone readings over distance, the surface area of the hemisphere
is calculated and then converted into decibels. See the “Surface Area” portion
of Equation 1. By calculating the surface area of the hemi-sphere, one can also make
measurements independent of the distance.
Equation 1 is the basic formula for Sound Power (Lw), where L is the sound pressure
level and w stands for watts (the units in which sound power is reported). Sound power
is typically reported in decibels referenced to 1 Picowatt (1 pW).
Sound Pressures - The sound pressure readings from the different microphones
(Lp) are averaged together and converted into decibels
Surface Area – The surface area over which the microphones are arranged are
converted to into decibels. The reference surface area (So) is 1 m2.
The sound power of an object is always the same no matter what size hemisphere is
used to measure the sound power. The pressures and surface area work in conjunction
with each other to make the total sound power always be the same (Picture 6).
Unrestricted
29
Picture 6: Cross section of hemi-sphere-shaped sound power arrangement. Left shows microphones close to object
which increases sound pressure readings but has smaller surface area. Right shows larger surface area with
microphones farther from object.
As the surface area gets smaller, the microphones are at a closer distance to the test
object:
The closer the microphones are to the object, the higher the sound pressure
readings.
The higher sound pressure readings are offset in the equation by the reduction in
surface area.
The sound power equation is setup so that any changes in sound pressures are offset by
equivalent changes in the surface area, so the total sound power remains constant.
Unrestricted
30
Picture 7: Sound power spectrum test result – A-weighted decibels referenced to Watts versus octave bands
The final results of a sound power test would be an A-weighted octave spectrum (Picture
7). It has units of decibels referenced to Watts.
Correction Factors
Sound power tests are run in a variety of facilities of differing quality and performance.
Correction factors can be used to remove some of the variation found between test
facilities.
In fact, the Sound Power equation that was presented in Equation 1 assumes that there
are no other sound sources nearby. It also assumes that there are no reflective walls near
the test, other than the reflecting plane of the ground.
Picture 8: A virtual CAE simulation of a sound power test does not have extraneous background noises
In a virtual CAE sound simulation, this could easily be the case (Picture 8). But in real-
world practice, there can be reflections and other sound sources. The correction factors,
K1 and K2, are used to remove the effects of reflections and other sources, within
certain limits. These corrections are performed on an octave band basis.
Unrestricted
31
K1 – Background Correction
When performing a sound power test, a measurement is made without the test object
emitting noise. This is called the background noise measurement. This correction is
done per octave band. Depending on the levels of the background noise compared to
the actual test, a few corrective actions might be made:
If the background levels are higher than the noise emitting object under test, the
entire test is not valid.
If the background levels are extremely low compared to the test object, no
correction is made. This is the case for background levels 15 dB below or less than
the measurement levels.
If the background noise is within a prescribed range compared to the actual test,
the contributions of the background noise can be subtracted from the total sound
power.
K2 - Reflections
Some test environments are not perfectly anechoic. Sound reflects back from areas
other than the reflecting plane, causing the sound power levels to be higher than they
should be. The amount of reflected noise can be quantified and corrected.
To do this, a reference sound source is measured in the test environment. The reference
sound source creates a repeatable, known sound power level. For a given octave band,
if the reference sound source should be 90 dB, but 91 dB is measured due to extra
reflections, the increase can be corrected.
These two correction factors are subtracted from the sound power value. See Equation2.
Equation 2: Sound Power equation with sound pressures, surface area, and correction factors
With the addition of correction factors, the sound power equation is now complete.
Unrestricted
32
Conclusion
Sound power attempts to quantify the acoustic source strength of an object,
independent of the distance and location of the sound measurements.
There are four main factors taken into consideration when calculating sound power
(Equation 2):
Sound power is often used in noise regulations and legal certifications because it is not
location or distance dependent. ISO 3744 and other standards have in-depth details on
how these measurements are to be performed.
Unrestricted
33
Sound Absorption
When sound reaches a barrier, three things can happen as shown in Figure 1:
Unrestricted
34
The amount of absorption, reflection, and transmission of the sound is different for
every frequency.
For example, a high frequency sound with a short wavelength can be absorbed by a
thinner piece of material, while lower frequency sounds are not absorbed, due to their
longer wavelength.
This article will explore what variables can affect sound absorption and how absorption
can be measured.
Absorption Quantification
Absorption is can be expressed via the “absorption coefficient” (Equation 1) which can
have a value between 0 and 1.
When the absorption coefficient equals one, all the sound is absorbed
When the absorption coefficient equals zero, no sound is absorbed
Unrestricted
35
Between 50 and 100 Hz in Figure 2, 100% of sound is absorbed. Below 50Hz, the
material does not absorb well. Thicker material may aid in helping to absorb the lower
frequencies.
Some absorption values for different materials are below. All values are approximate.
Note that the softer the material, the more absorption. The more dense and hard the
material, the less absorption.
There are several things that affect absorption. Some factors include: material
composition, humidity, material thickness, and material position.
Material Composition
Unrestricted
36
Porous materials typically absorb sound better than very dense materials. Examples of
porous materials include cloth, foam, fiber glass, and acoustic tiles. Porous materials
present a larger amount of surface area to the advancing sound waves. The fibers or
particles of the porous material can vibrate and dissipate the sound as heat. Very dense
materials (concrete, cinder block, glass) tend to reflect most of the incident sound.
Humidity
The speed of sound is affected by the humidity in the air. The speed of sound increases
as humidity increases. As the speed of sound increases, the absorption also increases, as
shown in Figure 4.
When performing an absorption test, samples should be stored for several days in a
humidity-controlled room to ensure they are at the desired humidity for the test.
Material Thickness
With all else being equal, increasing material thickness increases the absorption
performance at lower frequencies (Figure 5). It has been experimentally determined that
peak absorption of a frequency occurs when the material thickness is about one-quarter
the wavelength of the wave.
Unrestricted
37
Low frequency sounds have longer wavelengths; therefore, the material must be thicker
to absorb lower frequency sounds.
Material Position
Sound absorption depends on angle of incidence ( ) of the incoming plane wave. Often,
an “angle-averaged” value of absorption is used for design purposes.
In addition to the angle of incidence, material position relative to the supporting wall
matters.
For example, mounting the absorptive material flush with the wall versus mounting the
absorptive material and leaving an air-gap between the material and the wall will affect
the absorption coefficient.
Unrestricted
38
Figure 7: The effect of air between absorptive sample and reflective wall.
Experimental data shows that leaving one quarter of a wavelength between the wall and
the absorptive sample maximizes absorption at a given frequency.
This is because there is an inverse relationship between the pressure of the sound wave
and the air molecule velocity.
As the wave hits a wall, the molecule velocity slows down because the wall resists the
motion of the air molecules. At the wall, there is a high pressure, low velocity location.
In the areas of low pressure, the molecules are less densely spaced. Therefore, in the
low-pressure areas, the molecules can move more freely and at higher velocities.
Figure 8: The inverse relationship between pressure and molecular velocity. In areas where the pressure is high, the
molecular velocity is low. In areas where pressure is low, molecular velocity is high.
Unrestricted
39
Sound is absorbed when there is friction between the air molecules and the absorptive
material causing the sound energy to dissipate as heat.
The higher the velocity of the air molecules, the more friction and the more
absorption.
The lower the velocity of the air molecules, the less friction and the less
absorption.
Looking at the graphic, you can see that the area of low pressure, high velocity, is one
quarter wavelength away from the wall. Therefore, the absorptive material should be
placed one quarter wavelength away from the wall to maximize the absorption of the
wave.
Figure 9: Absorptive material (pink) is placed one quarter wavelength away from the wall to maximize absorption.
The concept of placing the absorptive material one quarter wavelength away from a wall
is sometimes referred to as the “Quarter Wavelength Rule”.
Note that placing the material one quarter wavelength away from the wall maximizes
absorption for that corresponding frequency. If it is desired to absorb a broadband range
of frequencies, a thick piece of material must be used so that there is material “one
quarter wavelength” away from the wall at many frequencies. There is a trade-off
between material cost and the range of frequencies targeted with the “quarter
wavelength rule”.
Measuring Absorption
There are two methods to measure a material’s absorptive properties: the tube method
and the room method.
The tube method uses direct incidence. In this case, the sound waves all approach
the sample at the same angle. See Figure 10.
Unrestricted
40
The room method uses random incidence. In this case, the sound waves approach
the sample at random angles. See Figure 10.
Figure 10: The blue arrows represent sound waves. Direct incidence: all sound waves approach sample at same
angle. Random incidence: sound waves approach the sample at random angles.
Hardware
Measuring a material’s absorption can be done with an “impedance tube”. These tubes
are typically made of straight “sound proof” tubing (typically thick steel).
One end of the tube is connected to a sound source which outputs a broadband range of
sound waves. The other end of the tube holds the sample to be tested. Therefore, the
sound waves approaching the sample are both direct incidence and normal to the
sample.
The tube ends in a rigid termination. A pair of microphones are positioned just before
the sample. See Figure 11 below.
Unrestricted
41
Figure
11: Top: Impedance tube. Bottom: cross section of the impedance tube to show sample location within the tube.
Sample Preparation
Samples of the test specimen must be cut to fit within the tube. Care must be taken
when cutting the samples as the boundary conditions between the sample and the tube
can greatly affect the resulting measurements.
Some impedance tubes come with sample cutters that are designed to cut samples to
the exact diameter of the tube. But, these material cutters can slightly compress the
sample during cutting, altering the samples absorption properties.
A better alternative to a sample cutter is using a waterjet to cut the material. A CNC
waterjet will produce an accurately cut, repeatable sample.
A well-cut sample will fit flush with the tube and will neither compress nor leave a gap
between the tube and the sample diameter.
Unrestricted
42
An improperly cut sample could be cut too large and compress when placed in the tube
or be cut too small and leave a gap between the sample and the tube wall.
In the above figure, the first sample was cut too large: the edges of the sample are
compressed in the tube. The second sample was cut with too small: there is a gap
between the tube and the sample.
Test
To test the absorption of the sample, a broadband signal is output by the speaker.
Multiple averages are taken to ensure that random noise on the measurement is
averaged out.
The result of the measurement is a graph of the absorption coefficient vs. frequency. See
Figure 15 below.
Unrestricted
43
Figure 15: The result of an absorption test in tube is the absorption coefficient of the material vs. frequency (bottom
graph).
The above figure is taken from the Simcenter Testlab Absorption Testing using
Impedance Tubesoftware.
A reverberation room is designed to have hard, reflective walls built at oblique angles, so
no walls are parallel to each other. This causes the sound waves to be reflected a
maximum number of times around the room to help create a diffuse field.
Unrestricted
44
Figure 16: Reverberation room are built with walls at oblique angles.
Often, hemi-spherical features are added to large walls to increase wave diffraction
(spreading out), adding to the diffusivity of the chamber. One of these hemispheres can
be seen in Figure 17.
Common items to test using the reverberation room method are material samples
(usually about 1m x 1m), acoustic panels, and even furniture.
Step 1: Measuring the reverberation time in the room with no test sample
Step 2: Measuring the reverberation time in the room with the test sample
It is recommended to take multiple measurements for each test condition and average
the results to remove the effects of uncorrelated noise on the measurement.
Unrestricted
45
We need to test the room with and without the sample. The difference in reverberation
time between the two conditions gives an indication of the absorption of the sample.
The absorption value is closely related to the reverberation time. See ISO 354:2003 for
the exact equations and specs.
To determine the reverberation time of the room, a T60 decay time is used. This is the
time in seconds it takes for the sound pressure level (SPL) to decrease by 60dB after the
sound source is stopped.
The sound source is played for a few seconds, then stops. After there is 5dB of
attenuation, the decay time measurement starts (green dot in Figure 18). After 60dB of
additional attenuation, the decay time measurement stops (red dot in Figure 18).
It’s important to note that it is not always to possible to play a sound loud enough to get
60 dB of attenuation. Therefore, T20 or T30 decay times are often used. These work the
same way at the T60 decay time except they only require 20 dB or 30 dB of attenuation
respectively. Even though the decay is only measured over 20 dB or 30 dB of
attenuation, the decay times are projected for a 60-dB decay. So even if the T20 or T30
methods are used, times are still reported as T60.
Unrestricted
46
Figure 19: In Simcenter Testlab, it is possible to calculate the T20, T30, and T60 reverberation times in the Online
Processing workbook.
Of course, the decay time can change with frequency, and is therefore measured for
each octave band (see Figure 20).
Figure 20: The decay time is plotted for each octave band. This graph shows the decay time per octave band.
The reverberation time is closely related to the absorption of the empty room. After
calculating reverberation time for each octave band, the absorption of the empty room
is then calculated for each octave band.
Unrestricted
47
Figure 21: Setup to measure absorption of a material sample (purple). Multiple microphones (grey circles) and
sources (red boxes) are used in the reverberant room.
Now the reverberation time of the room with the sample in it is calculated.
The reverberation time of the room with the sample should be shorter than the
reverberation time of the room without the sample. This is because we expect the
sample to add absorption to the room.
After calculating reverberation time for each octave band, the absorption of the empty
room is then calculated for each octave band.
Step 1: Measuring the reverberation time in the room with no test sample.
Calculate absorption of empty room.
Step 2: Measuring the reverberation time in the room with the test sample.
Calculate absorption of room with sample.
To determine the absorption of just the test sample, the absorption of empty room is
subtracted from the absorption of the room and sample.
Equation 2: the absorption of the sample is calculated by subtracting the absorption of the empty room from the
absorption of the room with the sample in it.
Unrestricted
48
When testing an absorber in a reverberant room, the results of the test is the absorption
coefficient with respect to frequency.
Figure 22: The calculated absorption coefficient vs. frequency (bottom right).
Conclusion
There are two common methods to measure sound absorption: in an impedance tube
and in a reverberant room. Measuring in an impedance tube results in the absorption
coefficient vs. frequency. Measuring in a reverberant room results in the absorption
coefficient vs. frequency or the equivalent absorption area of the test sample vs.
frequency.
Unrestricted
49
Background
Within the European Union (EU), there are explicit limits on how much noise outdoor
machinery can produce, putting pressure on manufacturers and end users.
Producers of equipment both made outside and inside of the EU are affected by this
legislation if they wish to sell products to EU countries. Anyone who wants to sell certain
equipment on the European market has to measure its emitted sound power level and
stay below the specified target set by national legislations.
Unrestricted
50
Picture 1: European energy label including sound power declaration (lower right)
Other types of equipment do not need to meet specific targets, but the standards and
directives require manufacturers to label (Picture 1) their products with noise
declarations; their guaranteed sound power levels.
Choosing the correct standard for qualifying an acoustic source can be a challenge. The
decision must consider a number of factors: Type of noise source, available equipment
and testing environment, regulations, etc.
Unrestricted
51
Sound power can be determined either through the measurement of sound pressure
[Pa] or sound intensity: the rate of energy flow through a unit area, expressed in watts
per unit area [W/m2].
Picture 2: Fixed array microphone method of sound pressure-based sound power measurements. Microphones are
arranged in a fixed arrangement around the object under test.
Sound pressure-based sound power standards include 2000/14/EC, ISO 3744, ISO 3745,
ISO 6394, ISO 6395, and ARI 260.
Sound intensity-based sound power can be measured in any sound field, but certain
requirements regarding the type of sound must be met. The measurements can be
performed on individual machines or sound sources in the presence of other
components radiating noise, because steady background noise does not contribute to
the measured sound intensity (Picture 3).
Unrestricted
52
However, this approach has a limited usable frequency bandwidth, time demanding
measurement procedures and limitations on the characteristics of the noise source.
ISO standards govern sound intensity-based measurements and describe the procedures
that are required to obtain quality results. ISO standards for intensity-based sound power
include ISO 9614-1 and ISO 9614-2.
Conclusions
Choosing the correct standard to follow can be a challenge. The decision must consider
several factors: Type of noise source, available equipment and testing environment,
regulations, etc.
This Guide to measuring Sound Power provides an overview of the existing standards as
well as the applicable regulations and noise codes, but the decision to execute which
tests which tests and measurements ultimately rests with the product manufacturer.
Unrestricted
53
Octaves represent the overall level of energy over a specific frequency range.
Figure 1: An octave map. Each vertical block is an octave and represents the overall level of sound energy over that
range of frequencies.
Unrestricted
54
Figure 2: In music, there is a doubling of frequency between notes of the same name.
Octave bands in human hearing are developed in the same manner: the range of human
hearing (20-20kHz) is divided into eleven octave bands, each band having double the
frequency span of the previous band. These are called the 1/1 octave bands.
Figure 3: The lower, upper, and center frequencies of the 1/1 octave bands over the human hearing range.
To more closely match how humans distinguish frequencies, each 1/1 octave band can
be split into three bands. These are called the 1/ 3 octave bands. These smaller bands
more closely represent how humans distinguish between frequencies.
Unrestricted
55
.
Octaves are not equally spaced
Octaves are often displayed so that the center frequencies
of the octave bands are linearly spaced. This is called octave
format. This causes the octaves to appear equally spaced in
frequency even though they are not.
Figure 4: The upper, lower, and center frequencies for the 1/3 octave bands
Figure 5: X-axis in octave format. The same random white noise is expressed in octaves and as an autopower.
The same data is plotted below but the x-axis is in linear format. Notice that an
autopower (blue) has the same density at all frequencies. Notice that the range of
frequencies each octave band (green) covers gets larger and larger.
Unrestricted
56
Figure 6: X-axis in linear format. The same random white noise is expressed in octaves and as an autopower.
Octave bands help determine how the human ear distinguishes between frequencies. At
lower frequencies, the ear can more easily distinguish between frequencies. Thus, the
octave bands are narrower. At higher frequencies, the ear has difficulty distinguishing
between frequencies (even frequencies that are somewhat far apart). Thus, the octave
bands are wider.
Unrestricted
57
Figure 7: Time data is fed through narrow band filters. Each filter represents an octave band. The overall level of the
time data is plotted on a per-octave basis and then plotted.
Both octave maps (like in the figure above) and octave sections can be calculated.
Octave maps plot the octave bands vs. the overall level of energy in those bands.
Octave sections track how a single octave band behaves against a tracking
parameter.
For example, the figure below shows how the 12.5 Hz, 20.0 Hz, and 25.0 Hz octave
bands change with time.
Unrestricted
58
Figure 8: An octave section tracks how an octave behaves against a tracking parameter. In this case, it is tracking the
octave against time.
Unrestricted
59
In Time Data Processing, open the “Acquisition parameters” settings button (“Change
Settings”).
Select an averaging method: exponential or linear. The exponential average weights the
acquisitions taken later in time more heavily than earlier acquisitions. The linear average
calculates the arithmetic mean of all the values.
Select a sound level type: fast (0.125 sec), slow (1.000 sec), impulse (0.035 sec), or user
(custom). This parameter changes the length of the averaging frame. The averaging
frame is the length of time that is used to calculate an average at every increment.
Check out the Simcenter Testlab Throughput Processing Tips article for more information
about increment and frames.
In Time Data Processing, open the “Section” settings button by clicking “Change Settings”
under “Section. To calculate an octave map, go to the “Octave Maps” tab. Check on the
octave band type that needs to be calculated.
Unrestricted
60
Figure 11: Calculating octave maps. In this case, 1/3 octaves will be calculated.
Unrestricted
61
To calculate a single octave section, go to the “Octave Sections” tab. Type in the center
frequency of the octave section(s) that is desired to be calculated.
The octave section calculation will calculate how an octave behaves vs. a tracking
parameter. Figure 14 below gives an example of the result from this calculation.
NOTE: There are a few additional tabs with the RTO (Real Time Octaves) suffix. Anything
with the suffix RTO will used filter-based octaves to do processing. For example,
“Psychoacoustic Metrics RTO” uses time-based filters to calculate sound metrics.
Unrestricted
62
There is a special display in Simcenter Testlab called the “Octave” display. The octave
display automatically puts the x-axis in octave format. It also automatically puts data into
a “block display” format (as octaves are traditionally displayed in). The icon for this
display is enlarged in Figure 15 below.
When data is dropped into an octave display, it will look similar to the data in Figure 12
above.
Unrestricted
63
The decibel was originally developed and used by the telephone industry to quantify
power loss in telegraph and telephone signals when sent through long cables. It is
named in honor of Alexander Graham Bell, a pioneer in the field of
telecommunication. While a decibel is defined as one tenth of a Bel, the Bel unit is rarely
used.
Formulation
The decibel is really nothing more than a logarithmic ratio between two numbers – a
measured value and a reference value. It is shown in two forms below: Equation 1 for
POWER quantities, and Equation 2 for field AMPLITUDE quantities.
Unrestricted
64
As the decibel value depends entirely on the ratio between a measured value and
the reference value, it is therefore critical to select the proper reference for the
calculation. This is particularly important when comparing values between tests or
measurements.
In acoustics, dB are often used to report sound pressure level (SPL). The reference for
pressure in Pascals has been established as 20 micro Pascals (20e-6 Pa). This value
represents the average human hearing threshold at 1000 Hz, or the smallest pressure
fluctuation perceivable to the average human ear at 1000 Hz.
Example
Using your Simcenter SCADAS hardware and Simcenter Testlab software, suppose you
set up a microphone to record an orchestra. While they are tuning their instruments,
you make a quick recording. The RMS amplitude of the sound reads 1.084
Pascals. What is the dB amplitude of the sound?
Unrestricted
65
Since sound pressure is an AMPLITUDE quantity, we will use the formulation below
Remember our dB Reference for Sound Pressure Level is 20 micro Pascals. Filling in our
equation we get the following:
You can check your work by having Simcenter Testlab display your recording in decibel
format.
Right-click on the Y-axis, select “Format”
Unrestricted
66
Looks like we got the correct answer! Of course this is ONLY because we chose the same
reference value as Simcenter Testlab used.
Unrestricted
67
Unrestricted
68
Near Field
Far Field
Free Field
Diffuse Field
This article explains the differences and usage of these acoustic sound field terms.
Unrestricted
69
Figure 1: Sound waves behave differently in the near field (A) and far field (B).
Far field
The acoustic far field is defined as beginning at a distance of 2 wavelengths away from
the sound source and extends outward to infinity (Figure 2). As wavelength is a
function of frequency, the start of the far field is also a function of frequency.
Figure 2: The far field begins at 2 wavelengths away from the source.
In the far field, the source is far enough away to essentially appear as a point in the
distance, with no discernable dimension or size. At this distance, the spherical shape of
the sound waves has grown to a large enough radius that one can reasonably
approximate the wave front as a plane-wave, with no curvature (Point B in Figure 1).
Unrestricted
70
At this distance, sound pressure level is governed by the inverse square law, and a single
microphone sound recording will give reliable & predictable results. For each doubling
of distance away from the source, the sound pressure will drop 6 dB in the far field.
Near Field
When close to a sound emitting object, the sound waves behave in a much more
complex fashion, and there is no fixed relationship between pressure and distance. Very
close to the source, the sound energy circulates back and forth with the vibrating surface
of the source, never escaping or propagating away.
These are sometimes called “evanescent” waves. As we move out away from the source,
some of the sound field continues to circulate, and some propagates away from the
object (Figure 3).
Figure 3: The near field is complex, with sound energy both circulating and propagating.
This mix of circulating and propagating waves means that there is no fixed relationship
between distance and sound pressure in the near field and making measurements with a
single microphone can be troublesome and unrepeatable. Typically, measuring in the
near field requires the use of more than one microphone (Figure 4) to accurately capture
the energy borne by the circulating and propagating waves.
Unrestricted
71
Figure 4: Acoustic arrays featuring many microphones can be used close to a source to accurately capture sound
energy in the near field.
Figure 5: Illustrations of the free field (zero reflections) and diffuse field (only reflections).
Free Field
In an acoustic free field there are no reflections; sound waves reach an observer directly
from a sound emitting object. The sound wave passes the observer exactly once, and
never returns.
Unrestricted
72
The sound source is far enough away that it appears as a single point source, far in the
distance. Visualize an airplane flying high overhead on a clear day.
An anechoic chamber is a special facility constructed to approximate an acoustic free
field by using materials to absorb sound waves before they can be reflected (Figure 6).
In an anechoic chamber, specially designed fiberglass wedges cover the walls, floor and
ceiling to absorb sound, so it is not reflected. To be effective (especially at low
frequencies,) these rooms need to be very large, with long wedges, and often feature
mechanical isolation from the surrounding building and foundation so no vibration is
transmitted to the chamber.
Diffuse Field
A diffuse field describes an acoustic field where sound waves reach the observer from all
directions. The reflected sound is of similar magnitude to the direct sound when it
reaches the observer, and as a result, does not appear to have a single source. A
microphone in a diffuse field measures the same magnitude regardless of orientation or
Unrestricted
73
location; the sound level is the same everywhere. A reverberant chamber for acoustic
material testing is shown in Figure 7.
7: A reverberant chamber has highly reflective walls to create a diffuse sound field.
How to Know
It is difficult to determine by visual inspection what type of acoustic field is present.
Using acoustic measurements, the following can be observed:
If in a free field, far field acoustic environment, there is a 6 decibel decrease in the
measured sound pressure level when doubling the distance from a sound emitting
object. This behavior is explained by the inverse square law.
In a diffuse field, like a reverberant chamber, the sound level is the same, no matter
where the microphone measurement recording is made.
In a perfectly diffuse sound field the sound intensity is zero.
Conclusion
In some circumstances, it is possible to apply diffuse or free field corrections to adjust the
measurement levels. Diffuse and free field corrections are often provided for microphones,
headsets, and binaural measurement devices.
Unrestricted
74
Sound Pressure
If you are new to the field of noise & vibration, the terms sound pressure, sound power,
and sound intensity may be a bit confusing. This is understandable, as they are all
commonly used, as well as interrelated… Not to mention they are all often expressed
in decibels, which can be confusing in its own right. However, they each represent a
different, important aspect of sound and how it is transmitted and experienced. In a
three-part series of posts, we will look at these three quantities of sound and see how
they are all measured, calculated and used.
Sound Pressure
Sound pressure is the foundation of most acoustic work not only because it is a quantity
analogous to our sense of hearing, but also because sound pressure measurements are
one of the only measurements for sound one can actually make! As we’ll see, sound
pressure measurements are the foundation of both sound power and sound intensity
calculations.
When an object makes sound, it does so by vibrating back and forth. This causes the air
molecules next to the object to vibrate as well. This vibrating chain reaction continues
outward (at the speed of sound) away from the object in the form of waves. These
Unrestricted
75
waves are analogous to the waves formed in water when a pebble is dropped into a
pond.
However, because atmospheric pressure is constant for the most part, and since we are
really only interested in the alternating portion of the pressure signal, we generally
subtract atmospheric pressure and normalize sound pressure levels to be reported as the
difference above/below zero. As we see in Figure 1 below, a normalized sound wave
creates pressures that are both above and below zero, corresponding to the red and blue
shaded regions respectively. Even though the normalized sound pressure is both
positive and negative, we only report the amplitude of the pressure wave as being
positive. This amplitude can be described using Peak, Peak-to-Peak, or RMS
scaling. When we hear a sound, our brain acts as an integrator of these positive and
negative oscillations, and we perceive a steady positive amplitude, we do not perceive
the actual fluctuation of the individual sine waves.
Unrestricted
76
Unrestricted
77
In Figure 2-A, we see small amplitude sound waves hitting the microphone, causing the
microphone membrane to vibrate back and forth with a small amplitude. This relative
motion between the membrane and an electrically charged disc called the “back plate”
results in a capacitive difference. This difference generates a voltage output from the
microphone that is proportional to the membrane displacement. In Figure 2-B, we see
the same sound source outputting a higher amplitude sound wave, which causes the
microphone membrane to vibrate with a higher amplitude, and thus output a larger
voltage.
Pressure Propagation
Just like the waves in the pond, the sound waves propagate away from the source in all
directions. This causes the wave to spread out, and as a result the amplitude goes down
as a function of distance. This is because we put a fixed amount of energy into the
water with our pebble - for the amount of energy transferred to the water to remain
constant, the amplitude of the wave must decrease as the wave front gets larger. This is
also why things are louder up close: the amplitude of the sound waves is larger nearer to
the source. As we move farther away, the same amount of energy is spread out over a
larger area, so the amplitude gets smaller. In fact, when no reflections are present, the
amplitude goes down by exactly half when we double our distance from the source. We
are going to use this property of sound to our advantage for both sound power and
sound intensity. Stay tuned for more!
Unrestricted
78
What is A-weighting?
A-weighting is a frequency dependent curve (or filter) which is applied to sound pressure
microphone measurements to mimic the effects of human hearing.
Given the same sound pressure levels, microphone recordings can be very different than
the levels perceived by the human ear (Figure 1).
Figure 1: A microphone (left) and human ear (right) will record/perceive sound differently.
There are several reasons why there can be difference in sound levels between a
microphone recording and human ear perception of sound.
The sound pressure on the microphone diaphragm versus the ear drum (Figure 2) can be
very different, even in the same sound field:
The air volume in the ear canal has a resonance around 4000 Hz, causing higher
sound levels on the ear drum than the microphone diaphragm
The presence of human head, torso and outer ear interfere with and alter the
sound field
Unrestricted
79
Other differences are due to the cochlea hearing organ (Figure 2) and psychological
effects:
The hearing organ, or cochlea, has difficulty detecting sounds at low frequencies
and very high frequencies
As humans age, damage to the cochlea causes high frequency hearing loss
The cochlea has a logarithmic shape, causing humans to be better able to
distinguish changes in pitch at lower frequencies than higher frequencies
Figure 2: Human Ear: Pinna, Ear Canal, Middle Ear, and Cochlea
Unlike the human ear, a microphone is not surrounded by a torso, pinna, and ear
canal. There is no logarithmically shaped hearing organ in a microphone. It is no
wonder there are differences between sound perceived by the human ear and a
microphone recording!
Unrestricted
80
Unrestricted
81
To remove any doubts, it is also customary to annotate the original, unweighted values
as “Linear”. For example, “80 dB Linear” or “80 dBL” or “80 dB (L)”.
This procedure is done at every frequency in the spectrum. It can also be applied to an
octave spectrum as well.
For example, observe the spectrum shown in Figure 5. The overall dB value is 84.2 dB
without A-weighting applied.
Unrestricted
82
Now observe the spectrum shown in Figure 6 which has A-weighting applied. The
overall dB value is 85.1 dB (A).
The A-weighted dB value of 85.1 dB (A) is higher than the Linear weighted value of 84.2
dB. Why? This is because the whistle, with a frequency of approximately 1600 Hz, is in
the frequency range (1000 to 6000 Hz) of the A-weighting curve where sound levels are
amplified. The net effect of this amplification is greater than the reduction in the
spectrum at all other frequencies. For example, the levels below 1000 Hz are greatly
reduced by introducing A-weighting, but because they are lower in amplitude their net
effect on the overall level is less than the amplification of the 1600 Hz whistle.
Unrestricted
83
Table of Values
Table 1 contains a list of the A-weighting attenuation and amplification values in dB for
1/3 octave center frequencies.
History
The A-weighting curve was derived from the Fletcher-Munson curves of equal
loudness. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) was the first to implement
the curve in Sound Level Meter standard published in 1936.
It should be kept in mind that the curve is not a perfect representation of effects of
human hearing. To be able to develop cost effective analog circuits, the curve had to be
simplified. For example, the A-weighting curve does not change as a function of the
sound level like human hearing.
Unrestricted
84
Used in various applications and industries, the B and C weighting curves are like A-
weighting, but do not have as much attenuation below 1000 Hz. The C weighting curve
is the flattest of the A, B and C curves. The D-weighting curve is typically used in very
high pressure aeronautical noise applications, like airplane flyover noise.
Unrestricted
85
Figure 8: Right click on Y-axis and select “Processing -> Weighting -> A” to apply A-weighting.
Applying A-weighting can also be done in colormap and octave displays as well.
This works inside the standard Simcenter Testlab, as well as Active Pictures in
PowerPoint, Word, Excel, etc.
Unrestricted
86
Unrestricted
87
Acoustics
History of Acoustics
Sound Pressure
What is a decibel?
What is A-weighting?
Octaves and Human Hearing
What is Sound Power?
Decibel Math
What is the Acoustic Quantity called Q?
Sound Absorption
Sound Transmission Loss
Noise level certification, how to select the right standard?
Sound pressure, sound power, and sound intensity: What is the difference?
Sound fields: Free and diffuse field, near and far field
Sound Quality
History of Acoustics
Sound Pressure
What is a decibel?
What is A-weighting?
Octaves and Human Hearing
Loudness and Sones
Calculating a Specific Loudness Spectrum in Simcenter Testlab
How to Calculate N10 Time Varying Loudness in Simcenter Testlab?
Articulation Index
Auditory Masking
Unrestricted
88
Durability
History of Fatigue
Stress and Strain
Calculating Damage with Miner's Rule
What is a SN-Curve?
Rainflow Counting
Difference between 'Range-Mean' and 'From-To' Counting
Power Spectral Density
Shock Response Spectrum (SRS)
How to Calculate a Shock Response Spectrum with Testlab?
Some Thoughts on Accelerated Durability Testing
Goodman-Haigh Diagram for Infinite Life
Measuring strain gauges in Simcenter Testlab
Rosette Strain Gauges
Calculating Damage in Simcenter Tecware Process Builder
Strain Gauges: Selecting an Excitation Voltage
Simcenter Testlab SCADAS and Long Strain Cables
Rotating Machinery
What is an order?
Torsional Vibration: What is it?
Zebra Tape Butt Joint Correction for Torsional Vibrations
Balancing: Static, Coupled, and Dynamic
Removing Spikes from RPM Signals
Using the Smoothing function to remove rpm spikes
RPM Calculation problems and Laser Tachometers
Simcenter Testlab Signature
Fixed Sampling versus Synchronous Sampling
Tips and tricks for acquiring torsional orders
Harmonic Removal
Interpreting Colormaps
Cycle to Cycle Averaging in Simcenter Testlab
Speed Sweep Data Processing: RPM Increment, Framesize, Sweep Rate, and Overlap
Order Cuts: How to Get the Correct Amplitude?
Unrestricted
89
Vibration Control
Unrestricted
90
Unrestricted
91
Simcenter Tecware
Unrestricted