Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 1 Industry and Economic Development: 1.0 Objectives
Unit 1 Industry and Economic Development: 1.0 Objectives
Unit 1 Industry and Economic Development: 1.0 Objectives
DEVELOPMENT
I .1 Introduction
1.2 Industrialisationand Economic Development
1.2.1 Meaning of Industrialisation
1.3 Need for Industrialisation
1.3.1 Industrialisation and Productivity of Labour
1.3.2 Industrialisation and Generation of Employment
1.3.3 Industrialisation and Low Elasticity of Demand for Food Products
1.3.4 Industrialisationand Mobillsation of Surplus
1.3.5 Industrialisation and Economies of Scale
1.3.6 Industrialisation and Balance of Payments
1.3.7 Industrialisation and Savings
1.3.8 Industrialisation, Stability and Flexibility
le.3.9 Industrialisation and Linkage Effects
.I 4 CritiqueofIndustrialisation
1 .5 Problems associated with Industrialisation
1.5.1 Extent and Pace of Industrialisation
1.5.2 Nature of Industries
1.5.3 -Order of Priority
1.5.4 Locatlon of the Industries
1.5.5 Large and Small-Scale Industries
1.6 Factors Hindering Industrialisationin Developing Countries
1.6.1 Economic Factors
1.6.2 Socio-demographic Factors
1.6.3 Administrative Factors
1.6.4 International Factors
1.7 Let Us Sum Up
1.8 Key Words
1.9 Some Usefhl Books and References
1.10 Answers or Hints to Check your progress Exercises
1.0 OBJECTIVES
This introductory unit provides an overview of the need for and significance of
Industrialisationin a developing economy. After going through this unit, you will be
1 . INTRODUCTION
The economic well -being of a nation is ciosely linked with the rate at which the
production ofmanufactured goods increases. Ever since the advent of the Industrial
Revolution in the last quarter of the eighteenthcentury, man has been making efforts
to improve the methods of production, by innovations and technological changes.
Production of manufactured goods has become central to human activity. Along
with this change in the focus of economic activity, associated socio-cultural-political
changes have come into existence. The primitive, isolated, self-contained socio-
economic life has paved the way for one in which human beings are more closely
interdependent and the geographical barriers have broken down.
It is ofcourse true that the available empirical evidence makes us believe the thesis
that no country could have developed and reached its current state of econon~ic
development without a sound agricultural base. Some countries, which had an
under-developed agricultural sector could make use of agricultural resources in
some other dependent country. In some other countries, agriculture served as a
'leading sector' of growth.
But it is also true at the same time that fast economic development everywhere had
been made possible essentially due to rapid industrialisation. There is hardly a
country in the world (with the possible exception ofNew Zealand) that could reach
the level ofper capita income ofindustially developed counties ofthe West, drawing
mainly upon its agriculture and processing of its products (petroleum produciilg
countries like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE represent a special case or exception
to the positive relationshipbetween per capita income and the share ofmanufacture).
The essential criteria that are being used to distinguish a developed economy from
an underdeveloped one, relate to the proportion ofwork force engaged in industrial
activity,the proportion of national output originating in the industrial sector, etc. No
wonder that not much distinction is made between the two terms "industrialisatio1.1"
and "economic development" and that both are used interchangeably.
1.2.1 Meaning of Industrialisation
Industrialisationis a process whereby a predominantly agrarian economy becomes
an industialised one.
..'.
The process of transformationof an agrarian economy into an industrial economy is Industry and Economic
On the basis of the above three criteriawe can define Industrialisation as a process
in which there is a sharp increase in the manufacturing share of GDP and of the
labour force. It is, thus, the process by which the centre of gravity ofthe economy
shifts f b m agriculture to industry.
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
3) How does industrialisation affect the compositihnoflabour force in an economy?
......................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
Industrial Economics:
Introduction 1.3 NEED FOR INDUSTRIALISATION
As early as the first five-year plan, India'sPlanning Commission had identified two
factors, which favour rapid industrialisationas a means to fast economic development.
These are:
a Theproductivity of labour in industry, which is much higher in industry than in
agriculture.
a In a developing economy the surpluses created in the industrial sector are
likely to be available for investment relatively more easily than surpluses in
agricultural sector. We will examine in detail these and other arguments that call
for rapid industrialisation in the following sections.
1.3.1 Industrialisation and Productivity of Labour
The capital stock is determined by the previous periods, capital stock plus net
investment, which come irom the c;; ------- l n a u s t ~ yrind Economic
As profits arereinvested, the MPL curve shifts to the right, more workers are hired
in the modern sector, and its output grows.
As this process increases, farmers will begin to specialise in producing certain crops,
and as they become more skilled at doing so, they increase their productivity. Each
specialist farmer is thus able to produce more food, and so exchange surplus food
with fellow farmers.
The result is that both individual and total incomes increase. However, at this point
the process reaches definite limits for the need of human beings for fwd is finite, and
after a while the need of the peasants (as consumers) for food will not grow as fast
as their output and income is growing. This is what is called 'low income elasticity
of demand for agriculturalproducts'.
At this point, then, farmers will want to exchange their surplus food products, not
for other farmers' surplus food, but for clothes, shelter and so on. However, such a
situation presupposes the existence of industrial production.
But in the real world, economies are not closed and are part of a global system in
which nation-states trade with each other. Is it not possible, then for some agrarian
economies to trade their surplus food with the products ofindustrial countries?
In such a scenario some counhies need tb industrialise, and can expand output and
incomes through increasing their productivity in industry. This is the basis of the
theory of comparative advantage,which holds that countries should specialise in
producing those goods in which they are efficient and competitive.
l r ~ d u s t r i a lEconomics:
Introduction
beyond imaginary closed economies, and exists at a global level. The potential
effectis that demand for food products rises less quickly than demand for industrial
products, and so the terms of trade can potentially decline for agrarian producers as
against industrial producers.
The result of such a decline is that agrarian producers pay relatively more for their
industrial imports against the amounts they receive for their exports. Agrarian
economies, therefore, would have to "run faster" in order to maintain even a slow
increase in living standard. In the real world where massive surpluses of cheap food
exist, it is simply not viable for nations to try to develop solely on the basis of
agricultural production.
1.3.4 Industrialisation and Mobilisation of Surplus
A major constraint on development in adevelopingeconomy is the lack of adequate
resources to finance the required needs. Inadequacy is the result of two interrelated
factors:
The absolute size of resources, national output and saving in a developing
economy,and
Difficulty to mobilisethe surpluses.
The task ofmobilisationof surplus savings in this sector is rendered difficult by the
fact that there is no suitable organisational set-up for this purpose. Why such set-
ups do not exist and why they cannot be created easily, needs to be explained. Such
a set-up can more easily be provided inthe industrial sector of the economy. Thus,
by concentrating resources on industrialisation, the pace of economic developinent
can be quickened.
1.3.5 Industrialisation and Economies of Scale
The case for large-scaleindustrialisation is also based on economies ofscale. These
economies are derived fiom investment in large-scale, capital-intensivetechnologies,
which have the effect of decreasing the unit cost ofproduction as the volume of
output increases. Thus, a country with output per annum of 1,000 units may have
production costs of 100 per unit. However, with technological innovation output
per annum may increase to 2,000 units, but unit costs will decrease to say, 75. The
primary reason why unit costs are likely to decrease is that labour productivity is
intensified as technological innovations increase.
On the whole, this is an argument where differences between the short-run and
long-run are important. Given a higher income elasticity ofdemand for industrial as
opposed to agricultural products, it might be argued that a failure to begin to build
up an industrial sector may produce increasing current-accountbalance of payment!:
problems as incomes rise and demand for industrial goods expands. But possibly
more important is the kind of industrialisation,which is undertaken, particularly in
respect of the balance between capital goods and consumer goods.
,
1.3.7 Industrialisation and Savings
*
Industrial investment expands savings. This propositioncould be argued in two ways:
In the second place, an econoiny may attach more importance to taxation rather
than savingsas a means of mobilising financial resources for economicdevelopment.
It is easier to tax income received in industrial activitiesthan in agricultural activities,
both for administrativereasons (greater literacy, concentration ofpopulation and so
on) and for economic reasons (higher standard of living, more awareness and so
\
1.3,8 Industrialisation, Stability and Flexibility
In~dustrialgrowth relieves fluctuationsand encourages stability of incomes, tax receipts -
and so on. This is most often used as an argument for the promlotion ofindustriahsation
in contrast to the traditional production of primary products for export markets
where prices and total export receipts vary considerably.
1) Explain in briefhow productivity levels are higher in the industrial sector than in
the agricultural sector.
......................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................
It has been said that the drive for industrial growth has destroyed the environment
and has used up exhaustible natural resources, particularly energy. Contemporary
concerns over global destruction of the ozone layer are pressing reminders of the
fact that the industrial world has intensified pollution, while there is some question
over the degree to which resources can be renewed if all nations choose (or are
able to choose) the route of rapid industrialisation.
It has also been claimed that rapid growth, spurred by the industry, increases
inequalities and proceeds without regard to the damage inflicted upon its victims.
Perhaps, most convincingly, it has been argued that in countries where cultivable
land and capital are scarce &d where labour force grows rapidly and mass emigration
is ruled out, development must aim at raising the yield of land; that food output can
grow only if markets exist in which the food can be sold; and that, exports apart,
these markets must be found in the countryside, amongst the mass of the rural
population. Rural development, the argument goes, combined with income
redistribution is a necessary condition for economic growth.
the ground that they are so productive that unit production costs are potentially
lower than otherwise. The potential advantages, however, are never realised
because of the lack of higher level of technological and managerial skills that
must accompany sophisticated technology.
viii) In many a situation, industry in a developingcountry may be confronted with a
very small size of market which may not be sufficient to absorb production at
an economically viable level. This results primarily from lack of adequate
purchasing power in the wake of low productivity and low levels of income.
1.6.2 Socio-Demographic Factors
Among the demographic factors that hinder industrialisation is the fast-rising
population. It acts in two ways:
A fast-rising population implies a sharp rise in the level of consumption in the
economy. Given the fact that productivity in these economies is low, as well
growing only at a very slow rate, a rising consumption level leaves hardly any
surplus in the form of saving. Inadequate saving makes investment impossible.
n As the populationrises, the size of labour force also increases. In the absence
of altemat!ve employment opportunities, a larger part of the increased labour
force finds work for itself in already overcrowded agricultural sector and tends
to affect adverselyproductivity in this sector. A lower productivity in agriculture
has two implications for the industry.
One, since the rural sector absorbs the larger proportion of total population, a
major chunk of saving can originate from this source. But this does not happen
when the level ofproductivityin agricultureis low.
Two, industry depends upon agriculture, which is the major source ofdemand for
industrial products. But low productivity and consequent low purchasing power in
this sector, work only as disincentive to further industrialisation,since the domestic
market may not be sufficient to make the industrial activity viable.
As regards social factors, the social organisation and social attitudes in developing
countries are such as to hinder the growth of industrialproduction. These act through
influencing the supply of various productive factors like labour, capital and
entrepreneurial ability.
1.6.3 Administrative Factors
The important factors that hinder industrialisationin a developing economy can be
identified as follows:
i) M c i e n c y of administration generally leads to mismanagement and loss in public
sector undertakings.
ii) Frequent changes in tax policy, in foreign exchange rates, in customs and excise,
in trade controls and licensing policies, etc., create uncertainty in the minds of
investors who may be reluctant to undertake new investment.
iii) Improper and faulty labour legislation is another element of bad public
administration,which causes tension in these countries.
1.6.4 International Factors
Industrialisation in developing countries is also inhibited by various international
factors, like coinpetition froin imported goods, impo~iri;lnofcustoms baniers by'
I n d u s t r i a l Economics: the developed countries, high costs of imports of scarce raw materials, technological
Introduction
know-how, machinery and equipment, etc. The sum total of the various factors
discussed above is that industrialisationof a developing economy is neither an easy
task nor a smooth process; however, as would be seen in subsequent units, the
various difficulties that hinder industrialisation in developing countries are not
insurmountable. At times, they may simply call for easy solutions, at other times
some planned efforts by the'state may be required. More frequently, a successhl
programme in a developing economy cannot be achieved without an active
involvement ofthe state in such an activity.
Check Your Progress 3