Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Digest - Guevara vs. Inocentes, G. R. No. L-25577, 16 SCRA 379, March 15, 1966
Case Digest - Guevara vs. Inocentes, G. R. No. L-25577, 16 SCRA 379, March 15, 1966
The president shall have the power to make appointments during the recess of the Congress, but such
appointments shall be effective only until disapproval by the Commission on Appointments or until the
next adjournment of Congress.
Since there was no Commission on Appointments organized during the special session which
commenced on January 17, 1966, the respondent contended that the petitioner’s
adinterim appointment as well as other made under similar conditions must have lapsed when the
Congress adjourned its last special session. But the petitioner stated that (1) the specific provision in
the Constitution which states that: “until the next adjournment of Congress” means adjournment of
a regular session of Congress and not by a special session and (2) only theSenate adjourned sine die
at midnight of January 22, 1966 and the House of the Representative merely ‘suspended’ its session
and to be resumed on January 24, 1966 at 10:00 AM. The petitioner therefore concludes that
Congress has been in continuous session without interruption since January 17.
HELD: 1. NO. The phrase “until the next adjournment of Congress” does not make any reference to
specific session of Congress, whether regular or special. But a well-know Latin maxim
is statutory construction stated that ‘when the law does not distinguish we should not distinguish. Ubi
lex non distinguit nec nos distinguere debemus. It is safe to conclude that the authors of the 1935
Constitution used the word “adjournment” had in mind either regular or special and not simply
the regular one as the petitioner contended.
2. NO. The mere fact that the Senate adjourned sine die at midnight of January 22, 1966, the House
of the Representative is only a part of the Congress and not the Congress itself. So logically, the
adjournment of one of its Houses is considered adjournment of the Congress as a whole. And the
petitioner’s ad interim appointment must have been lapsed on January 22, 1966 upon adjournment of
the Senate