Running head: FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 1

Front-Back Organizations

Students Name

Course Name

May 11, 2021

FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 2

Front-Back Organizations

Chapter 1- Background/Introduction

Introduction

As a new organization structure, the front-back (F/B) organization has been examined

predominantly by Galbraith. Here, the F/B association comprises two significant closures;

front and back end. The previous is coordinated dependent on locale or country, and the last

spotlights on items (Fig.1). The F/B organization showed up in the advancement of

globalization. Associations need to fulfill worldwide needs; for example, cost decreases

through the formally dressed item just as the nearby requests like modified items. Although

each end has utilitarian units, upstream capacities, for example, R&D and creation, have a

place with back end and downstream ones; for example, deals and administration comprise

the front end. In this sense, the F/B organization is supposed to be unique about the multi-

divisional organization and worldwide lattice organization[ CITATION Meh162 \l 1033 ].

Nonetheless, the F/B organization is frequently supposed to be a sort of crossover

organization. Here, we need to focus on the significance of the term 'hybrid.' at the end of the

day, we need to distinguish the typical and various perspectives among a few organizations,

for example, multi-divisional organizations and network organizations. This correlation will

explain the quirks of the F/B organization.

FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 3

Figure 1 Front-Back Organization

The F/B organization is utilized as an approach to managing this quandary. In the

back closures, improvement and a few creations are carried out in a formally dressed manner,

achieving high strength and cost decrease. Then again, in front finishes, every item is redone

to satisfy the market need. To make the F/B organization viable, Galbraith (2000) calls

attention to three parts of coordination. The first is the game plan of capacities. Capacities

like deals and after-deals administration concerning reaction to the market have a place in the

front end. Then again, capacities, for example, R&D and item plan, for reconciliation and

proficiency go in the back end. Notwithstanding, advertising exercises, for instance, can be

perceived from two stances, item showcasing and client promoting, and go in both the front

and back closes. Because of the conversation up until now, we initially explain the qualities

and benefits/negative marks of the F/B organization. Then, we will make a correlation among

multi-divisional, F/B, and global matrix organizations. At that point, we will allude to the

formative interaction of the organizational structure of worldwide companies.

Problem Statement and Purpose of Research

The conceptualization of organizational construction is the indication of an orderly

idea. The organization comprises components, relations among components, and design as an

over-simplification creating a unit. Construction is a high mix of the relations between

hierarchical components framing the presence theory of authoritative movement. Orderly

perspective on the organization's structure shows that design is made out of complex

components on one side and delicate components on the opposite side[ CITATION Fis15 \l

1033 ]. These underlying models characterize working and prescriptive techniques;

prescriptive strategy is related to management and keeping up the qualities in the system.

Working technique alludes to the applied obligations at different levels in the system. The
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 4

relations among the levels can be grouped into prescriptive or working. The relations require

assessment or judgment; it is related to the assets designation, obligations, and obligations in

working relations. Their primary models are not pecking order. The schools and colleges are

depicted as vertical and progression. The high instructor power is appointed to the top

educator, and through the heads of areas, the periods are moved.

Relevance and Significance

No other subject in administration has gone through as much change in the previous

few years as getting sorted out and traditional design. Supervisors are addressing and

reconsidering conventional ways to deal with getting sorted out work. They continued

looking for hierarchical designs that can accomplish effectiveness and have the adaptability

fundamental for achieving the present robust climate. In numerous associations, a

qualification can be made among line and staff authority. Line directors are answerable for

the fundamental exercises of the organization, including creation and deals. Line

administrators have the power to give requests to those in the levels of leadership. The

president, the creation chief, and the project supervisor are instances of line administrators.

Staff directors work in the supporting exercises of the organizations, like HR or bookkeeping.

The contemporary perspective on a range of control perceives that numerous elements impact

the fair number of representatives a chief can proficiently and adequately oversee. These

elements incorporate the supervisor and the representatives' abilities and capacities the

qualities of the work being finished[ CITATION Hab20 \l 1033 ]. For instance, the preparing and

experience workers have, the less immediate oversight they need. Like this, supervisors with

very much prepared and experienced representatives can work very well with a more

extensive range.

Research Questions
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 5

There are some research questions designed for those research. These as follows:

 What are the advantages and disadvantages of front-back organizations?

 What are the challenges and possible solutions of working in the front-back

organizations?

Barriers and Issues

There are many barriers because of limited research conducted on this topic. It is very

challenging to collect data about the front-back organization.

Chapter 2 - Review of the Literature

Advantages and Disadvantages of F/B Organization

To make F/B more powerful, it is helpful to get a handle on the benefits and bad

marks of the F/B association. The benefits are the following; the accomplishment of duality,

development of HR, and variety for advancement. The first is the accomplishment of duality.

Associations beat the difficulty of globalization by reacting to each market and client in the

front end and improve proficiency through the exertion in the back end. This satisfies

worldwide and nearby needs and prompts the accomplishment of duality. The second is the

development of HR. The individuals engaged with the two finishes and arrange the two

closures' practices comprehend worldwide and neighborhood perspectives, which expands

one's viewpoint. The third is the advancement of variety for development. There is a

distinction between the information acquired through the relationship to market and client

and the one created in the front end. This distinction is a more extensive one and will be a

wellspring of imaginative thoughts.

The connection between the two finishes. As the equivalent in different organizations,

in any case, there are disservices of the F/B organization. The first is a contention between
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 6

the two closures. When the front end attempts to fulfill the client's need completely, it needs

to purchase parts from providers other than the back end. Back end, then again, attempts to

offer its item to organizations other than its frond-end to build its deals. However, they are

regularly front-end rivals[ CITATION Alh20 \l 1033 ]. The second is pressure on the individuals

who associate the two finishes. If the two closures struggle with each other, it is hard for the

individual to facilitate them, which could be colossal pressure. The third is an inadequate or

mostly concurrent accomplishment of duality. Now and again, it is hard to find some kind of

harmony between two inconsistent requests. Albeit the F/B association has these faults,

merits are essential for organizations seeking after globalization. Subsequently, this

hierarchical construction is an incredible other option.

Since the (dis)advantages of the F/B organization have been identified, we will now

examine it from organizational design. According to Galbraith (1973), organization design

entails identifying and analyzing various organizational structures. The multi-divisional

organization, F/B organization, and global matrix are all terms used in this context. We can

describe the idiosyncrasies of these three organizations by comparing them. We use factors

like maintenance costs, lateral contact, and effectiveness to compare. Traditionally, these

have been used in organizational analysis. According to Galbraith, this current organizational

configuration is now known as the front-back hybrid matrix. This arrangement features two

parallel multifunctional line organizations: one based on consumer markets (the front end)

and the other on goods (the back end). The aim is to achieve consumer focus and

responsiveness while also achieving the world economy. The strategic recommendation is to

link and balance the consumer front end with the product back end in a matrix to achieve

these competing objectives efficiently. Across the two parallel entities, the management

structures form an external matrix.

Comparison with Global Matrix

FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 7

As with the previous discussion, we begin by comparing management costs. The

existence of double authority is the most significant difference between the F/B organization

and the model. While the line of command in the F/B organization is a single delegation of

communication, there are two formal command lines, such as goods and regions. As a result,

there is a disparity in the number of administrators. In the global matrix, management has a

broader reach[ CITATION Bec20 \l 1033 ]. This organization's two boss organizations are

interested in both product and area operations and a variety of roles. In the global matrix, this

results in higher management costs. Second, in the global matrix, lateral contact is formalized

as an organizational structure. On the other side, several people in the F/B organization link

activities on both ends. The matrix organization has the highest formality, according to

Galbraith (1973), which established several frameworks on lateral relationships. Finally, in

terms of duality, both the F/B Company and the global matrix simultaneously satisfy global

product requirements and local demand centered on regions or consumers. The lateral

relationship is formalized as a structure, and the global matrix has two lines of order. As a

result, it can achieve more extraordinary duality than the F/B organization. So far, we have

compared three organizations. The F/B organization is built around a single chain of authority

in a multi-divisional organization on the one hand and a goal of duality in the global matrix

on the other. As a result, the F/B organization can be classified as a "dual multi-divisional

organization.'

Comparison with Multidivisional Organization

The multi-divisional organization is organized around a commodity or a territory. The

front end of an F/B company, on the other hand, is made up of regions, while the back end is

made up of products. This is a significant distinction from a multi-divisional structure.

Furthermore, each division in a multi-divisional organization has all of the required functions

to operate independently. However, in an F/B company, tasks similar to the market are
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 8

assigned to the front end, whereas those that are far from the market are assigned to the back

end. This feature of the F/B organization's work structure is an idiosyncrasy. We concentrate

on management costs as a result of this disparity.

Simply put, a multi-divisional company has divisions that correspond to its goods. On

the other hand, in the F/B organization, its front end has the same number of area or nation

units as markets, and the back end has the same number of units as goods. Since the F/B

Company is more complicated and requires more managers, administrative costs are higher.

We will look at lateral contact next. Though there is no structured lateral contact in the multi-

divisional organization, some people in the two end in the F/B organization[ CITATION Alh20 \l

1033 ]. They coordinate the goods and services required by the front end with those provided

by the back end. Then, to achieve duality, we concentrate on effectiveness as a solution to the

globalization dilemma. The multi-divisional structure is centered on a single axis, such as

goods or regions. The productivity of the product-based multi-divisional organization is the

aim, while the region-based one focuses on the local market. Both satisfy one aspect of the

problem, but neither achieves duality. The F/B Company, on the other hand, does so because

each end is confronted with a unique dilemma.

F/B Organization in Developmental Stage

The F/B Company has its features and is an idiosyncratic organizational structure,

according to three organizations. As a result, we will move on to the relationship between

these organizations. We can comprehend it in the growth process because the F/B

organization has emerged in the globalization of companies. According to Stopford and

Wells (1972), an organization's structure evolves from one with an organizational structure to

one with a region-based or commodity global multi-divisional organization, and finally to a

global matrix. We can now incorporate the F/B organization into the process. As previously
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 9

stated, multinational companies face the globalization problem, and those with a product-

based multi-divisional structure will face local demands such as product customization for the

regional market as they expand their businesses. Those who choose a region-based multi-

divisional framework, on the other hand, would have to meet the global demands as well. The

F/B Company would be a strong option in this case. In other words, multinational

organizations do not immediately move to the global matrix; instead, they prefer the F/B

organization because it requires less management effort while having a lower degree of

duality achievement than the global matrix[ CITATION Bec20 \l 1033 ]. As a result of the need

for a higher degree of duality, companies use the global matrix. Based on the discussion thus

far, we can conclude that depending on the degree of environmental strain, and organizational

structure can emerge, as shown in Fig.2, as shown in the globalization dilemma.

Figure 2 Developmental Model of a Global Corporation

The balance of power between the company's various dimensions is a crucial

characteristic of the matrix structure. Making a dimension report higher up the hierarchy is
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 10

one of the simplest ways to boost its power. P&G's product-category country units, which

were formed in 1995, reported to regional managers, who reported to the CEO. Strategic

Marketing Organizations (MDOs), which are customer-focused or front-end organizations,

and Global Business Units, which are product-category-focused or back-end business units,

were also formed in the new Organization 2005, both reporting directly to the CEO (GBUs).

The Global Business Services (GBS) organization was founded to assist these two companies

by focusing on cost reduction. The core functions of the company were kept centralized. The

CEO had complete control of both the GBS and the corporate functions. The MDOs, which

were headed by a president who reported directly to the CEO, were in charge of revenue

development and were paid accordingly. Their goal was to concentrate on consumer needs

and tailor their global marketing strategies and services to meet those needs. North America,

Western Europe, Central Europe (including the Middle East and Africa), Latin America,

Northeast Asia, China, and Asia – each of the seven MBOs – had its customer market

analysis, sales, in-store presence, and other support functions.

As shown in Figure 11, the front-back hybrid matrix structure enabled the company to

face these two challenges with the MDOs and GBUs while also building clear and effective

lateral systems with the GSO and corporate functions. It was not enough to match strategy

and structure to ensure performance. Between the contrasting dimensions, the reward and

process design policies had to be well-matched and integrated. People, on the other hand, are

critical to the matrix structure's smooth functioning. Matrix is a collaborative organization,

and to work properly, people must have the requisite teamwork skills. Customers, regions,

and consumer groups are organized on the front end of the market, while goods are organized

on the back end[ CITATION Fis15 \l 1033 ]. The back end is designed to reach a global size, so

the front end is designed to adapt to local conditions. In the front-back model, supply chain,

product marketing, and product creation are more international and regional-oriented. There
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 11

is no such thing as a nation matrix. The customer-centric front end focuses on gaining a deep

understanding of customers, cross-selling, and custom solutions. Marketing is based on

segmentation, local delivery, and consumer insights, and it is done locally. The P&L centers

may be located at one or both ends of the company. Unilever, for example, has a three-

dimensional organizational structure.

Many businesses have created global account units in response to the rise in customer

strength. ABB formed a global account team composed of seven core members, those with

the highest sales volume, and 30 expanded team members in response to pressure from

Daimler-Benz. The team created a single interface for Daimler and the companies to

collaborate on a global sales strategy. Typically, multinational account teams are restricted to

the sales department. P&G, Nike, and IBM all have multifunctional customer service

departments that are also P&L-responsible. In these businesses, the consumer dimension has

evolved into a wholly integrated fourth dimension. At P&G, a partial example of embedding

using matrix relations. Only the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) and one business group are

seen in the standard matrix of corporate roles across business units. The matrix reporting of

the Wal-Mart team is more detailed. It demonstrates how the consumer dimension is woven

into the organization's other three dimensions. The area team is accountable to both the North

American and global Wal-Mart teams[ CITATION Hab20 \l 1033 ]. The North American (NA)

business team reports to both the NA Fabric Care unit and the local Walmart team.

Chapter 3 - Approach/Methodology

The qualitative research methodology is used to conduct this research. A type of

scientific study is qualitative research. Scientific analysis, in general, is an investigation that

seeks answers to a query, follows a predetermined set of procedures to address the question,

and collects proof. Qualitative research has many of the same features as quantitative
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 12

research. It also aims to comprehend a given research issue or subject from the people who

live in the region. Qualitative research is beneficial for gathering culturally contextual

knowledge about a population's beliefs, attitudes, habits, and social contexts. The capacity of

qualitative research to include complex textual accounts of how people interpret a given

research problem is one of its strengths. It gives information on the "human" side of a

problem, i.e., people's sometimes conflicting attitudes, values, thoughts, feelings, and

relationships. Intangible variables such as social norms, socioeconomic status, gender roles,

nationality, or faith, whose position in the research problem may not be immediately

apparent, may also be identified using qualitative methods. When combined with quantitative

approaches, qualitative analysis will help us view and better understand the dynamic reality

of a situation and the consequences of quantitative results.

While qualitative data results may also be applied to individuals with similar

characteristics to those in the study community, acquiring a rich and nuanced understanding

of a particular social context or phenomenon usually takes priority over evoking data that can

be generalized to other geographical areas or populations. Qualitative analysis, in this

context, varies somewhat from empirical research in general. To comprehend qualitative

study, it is essential to understand research background, traditions, and philosophical

foundations. In qualitative studies, history writing is about more than just the past; it is also

about the future. One benefit of qualitative methods in exploratory research is that they

enable participants to reply in their own words rather than being forced to select from

predetermined answers, as quantitative methods do. Open-ended questions can elicit answers

from substantive and culturally relevant participants, unanticipated by the researcher, and rich

and understanding of the problem set.

Chapter 4: Findings, Analysis, and Summary of Results

FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 13

According to the initial study findings, the strategy of a comprehensive sample of

large US industrial companies dictated their organizational structures, and the common factor

between strategy and structure was the allocation of company capital to expected market

demand. He identifies four phases in the history of these large corporations: initial expansion

and resources accretion; resource rationalization; expansion into new markets and product

offerings to ensure continued full use of resources; and finally, the development of a new

structure to allow for continued effective resource mobilization. With all of these integration

efforts, the European market was becoming increasingly homogeneous, and the P&G country

functional structure was becoming increasingly inefficient, costly, and ineffective.

Manufacturing activities in the developing world were not standardized, lacked economies of

scale, and thus were expensive and inefficient[ CITATION Meh162 \l 1033 ]. Products were

tailored to local standards and laws, which provided little benefit to consumers but increased

supply chain costs and complexity. As a result, European management began promoting

cross-border collaboration through functions in the early 1980s, shifting the emphasis from

country management to business development. This effort successfully overrides country

managers' concerns that the plan would lead to a disregard for local customer preferences.

Procter & Gamble's MDO is in charge of the company's global activities (Market

Development organization). It is in charge of developing P&G's local market entry initiatives.

Country-specific schemes, trade networks, and retail consumers are all examples of market

growth programs. MDOs were grouped by Procter & Gamble into five organizational units:

Latin America, North America, Western Europe, Eastern, and Central Europe, and Asia.

North America, Western Europe, and Japan are considered developed markets by Procter &

Gamble, while Latin America, CEEMA, Greater China, and AAIK are considered emerging

markets. Global business services, which are part of Procter & Gamble's system, aids in the

efficient operation of global business units. Its aspirational description, technology, and
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 14

standard data tools allow MDOs and GBUs to understand the business better and serve

customers. Procter & Gamble's global business services company is responsible for

delivering world-class solutions at a low cost and minimal investment. P&G's organizational

structure shows that it provides global scope advantages, allowing the local emphasis to be

necessary to consumers in various countries, most likely 180 countries worldwide. P&G has

an organizational structure to help it grow; its corporate structure is built on a platform that

allows it to strike the advantages of a multinational organization with efficiency and pace.

P&G's global activities hold the company in contact with the local communities at all times.

The corporate role is the final aspect of P&G's organizational structure. This position is in

charge of portfolio analysis, company-level strategy, human resources, international affairs,

treasurer and business accounts, legal, and consolidated functional reports (Dodgson et al.

2006).

This is a conventional organizational structure of divisions centered on specialization.

Senior management, communications, finance, human resources, and operations make up the

well-known hierarchy. This is one of the most popular types, and it is not always built to

react quickly to change. A functional framework often aids the growth of specialists. This

structure pulls users away from a generalist position by bringing together professionals who

work in the same area. The matrix structure can be perplexing. It is made up of both practical

and divisional structures. Companies are divided into divisions of specialization, which are

further divided into projects and goods within those units. It has the potential to be highly

sophisticated, and as a result, proper implementation would necessitate a great deal of

preparation. A matrix or divisional structure fits well with organizations actively engaged in

product development because management groups people buy the program or project in

which they have the most experience. Functional and matrix setups can work well for large

organizations with many employees to manage, as they can quickly organize employees into
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 15

specialized areas and streamline communication between upper management and

employees[ CITATION Bec20 \l 1033 ]. A flat organizational structure could be ideal for a

business owner who is just starting and expects their employee count to remain low for the

near future. However, if the company grows or the overall role of the business changes,

leaders must be willing to adapt to a more suitable arrangement.

Chapter 5: Conclusions

IBM and Nokia have also introduced the front-back hybrid concept. Customer

strategy, product line planning, solution creation, solution ordering and pricing, and team

assembling and reassembly are the five main processes that need to be added. These critical

processes are the primary means by which leaders handle the conflicts between product- and

customer-centric units. The overhaul of incentive schemes is also discussed. The challenges

of cultivating and recruiting talent for account management in the construction industry are

highlighted to round out the organization. Overall, the organizational issues highlighted are

acquiring conflict management skills and managing this conflict through the five main

processes. A business that can offer solutions is a significant challenge for previously only

delivered stand-alone goods. This organization needs to incorporate a customer-centric

component and then integrate that element with its product-based framework. A company

that provides solutions must become customer-centric, but customer-centric businesses do not

have to provide solutions. The first section of this article introduces a model for connecting

strategy and organization. Then it lays out all of the organizational characteristics that make

up a customer-centric business.

The solutions approach determines how customer-centric an organization can become.

The following section identifies the various approaches that will define the various

organizational types that should be implemented. Customers are the priority on the front end.
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 16

It is made up of local customer accounts grouped by geography and broad global accounts

that span several geographies. Wireless network providers such as AT&T Wireless and

Vodafone are among these customers. The Professional Services association, which

incorporates the company's goods into networks for the operators, is used by these account

organizations[ CITATION Meh162 \l 1033 ]. The goods are provided by the organization's back

end. Customer Operations and product ranges are both benefit centers. Nokia initially

marketed only stand-alone goods to monopoly telecom firms such as British Telecom. These

businesses had large manufacturing departments that planned, constructed, and managed their

network infrastructure. As wireless was deregulated, new operators joined the market, such as

Orange in the United Kingdom and Mobilix in Denmark. These businesses were small start-

ups with limited engineering resources. "How quickly can you design and develop us a

network?" they asked Nokia. Nokia saw these newcomers as a business opportunity and acted

quickly. Other equipment firms had long-standing partnerships with state-owned enterprises

and were slow to respond.

The front-back structure is defined by the processes that connect the front and back

units. A corporate unit preparation and budgeting process, a new product creation process,

and an order fulfillment process are processes that a stand-alone product company would

have. The same procedures, plus five changes and improvements, require a solutions provider

who uses a front-back structure. Each product unit produces its goods, but to have a solution,

each unit's goods must work together by the product lines of other units. The component

integration strategy dimension is critical in deciding how much effort must be put into

preparing the entire portfolio to ensure that the items work together. Nokia, for example,

would need switches and transmission products, software, consultancy practices, customer

service contracts, and handsets that all operate together using 3G technology if it wants to sell

third-generation equipment 1. Without dialogue, the product units would not be able to create
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 17

their product lines. To direct the portfolio planning process, again, a solid top management

team is needed. A natural tension arises when customer-centric units are combined with

product-centric units. If not legitimized and resolved, this dispute can easily lead to a lack of

internal concentration and competitiveness. The management processes described above are

the primary means of handling and resolving disputes between the product- and consumer

units. These procedures enable a top-down aspect to be applied to the bottom-up element

already present in business unit organizations rather than being replaced. For most leaders,

the main transition is away from a one-on-one approach. The CEO and her management team

deal with one business unit at a time in the product organization[ CITATION Fis15 \l 1033 ]. The

front-to-back layout and spreadsheet preparation process imply a more collaborative

problem-solving process involving multiple product and service team leaders. Many leaders

struggle to manage these high-stress situations. Staying with limited scale and scope solutions

are recommended if a management team cannot navigate these processes. Solutions strategy

is both a team sport and a sport that deals with dispute resolution.
FRONT-BACK ORGANIZATIONS 18

References

Alhakimi, W., & Mahmoud, M. (2020). The impact of market orientation on innovativeness:

evidence from Yemeni SMEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and

Entrepreneurship, 14(1). doi:10.1108/APJIE-08-2019-0060

Becker, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2020). Customer experience: fundamental premises and

implications for research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48.

doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00718-x

Fiss, P. C., Ingenbleek, P., & Frambach, R. T. (2015). How important is customer orientation

for firm performance? A fuzzy set analysis of orientations, strategies, and

environments. Journal of Business Research, 69(4).

doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.120

Habel, J., & Kassemeier, R. (2020). When do customers perceive customer centricity? The

role of a firm's and salespeople's customer orientation. Journal of Personal Selling &

Sales Management, 40(1), 25-42. doi:10.1080/08853134.2019.1631174

Mehrpour, M., & Ahmady, G. A. (2016). Organizational Structure. Procedia - Social and

Behavioral Sciences. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.057