K.E. SOCIETY'S RAJARAMBAPU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, RAJARAMNAGAR, ISLAMPUR (An Autonomous Institute) Affiliated to Shivaji University Kolhapur 2014-2015 DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the project work entitled “Analysis and derign of pre-esrgineered building for industrial shed" is cartied out by students mentioned below, in partial fulfillment for the award of degree of Third Year Bachelor of Technology in Civil Engineering, RAJARAMBAPU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, RAJARAMNAGAR, affiliated to Shivaji University, Kolhapur during the academic year 2014-2015, Ikis certified that all cortections/suggestions indicated for Imernal Assessment have beew incor porated in the report deposited in the department library. ‘The project report has been approved as it satisfies the academic requirements in respect of project work preseribed for the Bachelor of Technology Degree SIGNATURE Shubham vilas parab Akshay ashok nikam ‘Aniket kisan mane nmnat sonwalkar RUT, Rajaramng‘Analysis and design of Pre Engineered Buildings for industrial shed” In structural engineering, a pre-engineered building (PEB) is designed by a PEB supplier or PEB manufacturer, 0 be fabricated using best suited inventory of raw materials available fromall sources and manufacturing methods that can efficiently satisfy a wide range of structural and aesthetic design requirements, as is becoming increasingly common due to the reduced amount of pre-engineering involved in custom computer-aided designs, so it is also known as simply Engineered Metal Buildings (EMB). Pre-engineered building is an assembly of L-shaped members, often referred as I-beams. In pre-engineered buildings, the I beams used are usually formed by welding together steel plates to form the I section, The I beams are then field-assembled (eg. bolted connections) te form the enlire frame of the pre-engineered building, Some manufacturers taper the framing members (varying in web depth) according to the local loading effects, Larger plate dimensions are used in areas of higher load effects Typically, primary frames are 2D type frames (ie, may be analyzed using two- dimensional techniques). Advances in computer-aided design technology, materials and manufacturing capabilities have assisted a growth inaltemate forms of pre-engineered building. For design a pre-engineered building, engineers consider the clear span between bear ing points, bay spacing, rof slope, live loads, dead loads, collateral loads, wind uplift, deflection ctiteria, intemal crane system and maximum practical size and weight of fabricated members ‘This design is done by computer aided system using software like STADD .PRO.so that we get accurate load calculation and check suitability of sections An efficiently designed pre-engineered building can be lighter than the conventional steel buildings by up to 30%, Lighter weight equates to less steel and a potential price savings in structural framework. This new technique is widely adopted in industrial sector RALT,Rajaramngar.CONTEN TITLE PAGE | CERTIFICATE ABSTRACT ‘CONTENTS LST OF TABLES LST OF FIGURES | NOMENCLATURE | ABBREVIATIONS INTRODUCTION 1 General 1.2 Motivation of the present work 1.3. Aims and objectives of the present work 1.4 Layout of the thesis Closure LITERATURE REVIEW MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY 3.1, Load calculation 3.2. Loud combinations 3.3, Support specifications EXPERIMENTAL ~ ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY 4.1.Staad pro. design steps 4.2.Staad. Pro, Report RIT,Rajaramngar,RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ‘CONCLUSIONS AND SCOPE FOR FUTURE STUDY REFERENCES APPENDIX -1 APPENDIX- APPROVED COPY OF SYNOPSIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RUT,Rajaramngar,LIST OF TABLES Caption Maletial properlies For composite laminate ‘Normalized transverse displacement (W), inplane normal sires ( @, ) and transverse shear stress (F_.) of an simply supported orthotropic beam in plane stress condition subjected to sinusoidal lead. Normalized tranverse displacement (W ), inplane normal sires ( @, } and ‘transverse shear stress (,_) of an simply supparted orthotropic plate in plane strain ‘condition subjected to sinusoidal loud. Rajaramngar.LIST OF FIGURES Caption ‘A laminated nurow beam in plane suess condition subjected to wansverse loading subjected to transverse loading. An elastic plate in & plane Srain condition with positive set of displacement components, |Geomery of a simply (diaphragm) suppored smart laminate under cylindrical bending attached with piezoelectric Layers at top and bottom and, displacement components RILT,Rajaramngar.RAT, Rajaramngar.PER ODE 3D,2D, 1D EBT cLBT cLPr Fost HosT FE RUT,Rajaramngar. ABBREVATIONS Pre engineered! building Ondinary differential equation ‘Three, two and one dimension Euler Bernoulli theory Classical amination beam theary Classical Lamination plate theory First-order shear deformlion theory Higher-onler shear deformation theory e clementChapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Motivation: Steel industry is growing rapidly in almost all parts of the world, The use of steel structures is not only economical but also eco friendly. Here we refer “Economical” with respect 10 time and cost. This can be Achieved by the application of Pre Engineered Buildings. Project Objectives To study pre engineered building To prepare a model of P.E.B To analyze structure using Studd Pro, To design sections, comnections ete, ro study the effect of PLE.B, for follow To reduce complexity on site. To achieve aceuracy. Speed of work, 1.3, Present theories and practices Pre Engineered Buildings are nothing but steel buildings in which excess steel is avoided by tapering the sections as per bending moment requirements, In Pre Engineered Buildings total design is done in factory and as per the design. All the required components are assembled and thereby reducing the time of completion, 1.4 Project Features: Pre Engineered Building system is Computer assisted and designed to create a buil for specific use The complete building system is Pre Engineered to facilitate ewsy production and assembly on site. Colour coating is given on top surface for bright appearance with colour with customer"s choice, RIT, RajaramngaAdvantages of Pre Engineeted Building: PEB System is zero maintenance & superior in strength than conventional Lower Cost Quality Control, Large Clear Spans Project Applications: + Ware houses + Factories + Workshops Offices Gas stations Vehicle parking sheds Show rooms Aircraft hangers Schools Sports and reerestional facilities Rajaramngar,Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW Report on major literature refered and studied, Literature review should include current thinking, findings, and approaches to the problem, Following citation format should be adopted, Generally following procedure is adopted, Name of author ~ year-work done in our awn language (50 6 lines ) For ex Tumer (1963) presented analysis of structures using stiffness matrix meted, They developed Sample Large-Angle-of-Atack Viscous Hypersonic Flows ever Complex Lift Configurations, Various research carried out new development of analytical tools RALT,Rajaramngar.Chapter 3 MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY Analysis and design of Pre Engineered building for industrial shed. Load calculations Internal dimensions of building: l=60 m, b=15 m_ Height of building up w eaves level= 6m Location of building= lampur (pune region) Type of toofing = G.l.sheets Area of opening {permeability of building 5% to 20%) Angle of rafter = < 10)" Spacing between two columns = 6m Number of frames = 10 Rajaramngar,Elevation RUT,Rajaramngar.Load calculations : A. Dead load Wight of purlin 5 kg/m? Weight of sheeting :5 kg/m” Total weight :10 kg/im?=0.1kIN/m? Total uniformly distributed load = 0.16 =0.6 KN/M Self weight of tapered section B. Live load: Live load =0,75 kN/m™ (Angle less than 10") =075°6 45 kN/or Collateral load: (Assumed) RIT,Rajaramngar.D. Wind load : Basic wind speed =39 mvs (pune region) KiKoKsVi L-Length of building (Greater hoz dim. Of bldg.) meters w-Width of building Lesser boz dim, Of bldg.) hL-Height of plinth h2-Eaves height from FFL h-Eaves height from FGL Roof Slope ‘Vb-Basic wind speed misec N.Design life of structure; mean probable Years ‘Terrain Category Category 1- Exposed open terrain with few or no obstructions having heights less than 1.Sm. Category2- Open terrain with well scattered obstructions having heights between 1.Sm.de 10m. Category3- Terrain with numerous closely spaced obstructions having heights around 10m, Category. Terrain with numerous closely spaced high obstruct Class of Building Class-A - Structure & or compo like cladding, roofing ete having greatest Hoz Or Vert dim <20m, Class-B - Structure & of compo like cladding, roofing etc having greatest Hoz Or Wert dim bet 20-50 Class-C - Structure & or compo like 12, roofing etc having greatest Hez Or Vert dim > 50m. KLRisk Coeff. SS HT Max Height of building from FGL 6 K2-TerrainSt-height &size factor K3-Topo graphy Factor ‘Va2-Design wind speed. msec 38.61 Pz-Design wind pressure KNfm*2 | 01804), RA.T,Rajaramngar,(Cpe-External Pressure coeff for walls Table No.4 1S 875 (Par3)-1987 Elevation 0.467 4.000 Wind Angle | E ic O° to wall SOFT wall (Cpe-External Pressure coeff for Pitched Roof of Single Span Bldg. ‘Table No.5 IS 875 (Pat3) - 1987 Roof Angle in degrees Wind Angle 0" *to ridge Elevation Roof Angle-1 Roof Angle-2 RILT,Rajaramngar.Roof [Wind Angleg = 0" Angle EF ‘GH 5) 090) 0.80 t 1.20 0.40 Local oveft = -2.0 Wind Drag Cpi-internal Pressure Coeff _ ‘Opennings not more than 5% of wall area Openings between 5% to 20% of wall area of wall area Opennings larger than than 2 RIGID FRAME COEFFICIENT Wind 2 Surface Lett Right Left Right 02 0.78 12 0.25 144 090) 044 0.10 090 -i44] 0100.44 O75 02) 025 12 Friction 0 0 0 0 FRONT / BACK SIDE WALL "(19 WIND. PRESSURESUCTION: Wind Wind “Pressure “Suction 1.073 0.894 .GirvHeader 1073 -0.894 Panel 1073 0.894 Jamb Parapet 1073 0.884 Gin EDGE) CORNER ZONE (MM} LOCAL COEFF RATIO LOCAL TO AVERAGE Rajaramngar,LEFT/RIGHT ENDWALL *(38)WIND PRESSURE/SUCTION: Wind Wind “Pressure "Suction 1073-0984 Column 1.073 -0.984 .Gir/Header 1073-0984 Jam 1073 0.984 Panel Parapet 1.073 0.984 Girt 939) WIND COEFFICIENTS Rafier_Wind_ 1 Rafter_ Wind Bracing Wind Left Right Lent Right Left 02 0.75 12 0.25 02 “1.44 090 0.44 0.10 “144 0-144 0.10 44 0.90 D5 02 025 12 0.75 ROOF DESIGN 38) WIND PRESSURESUCTION: Wind = "Wind Wind "Pressure *Suction *Suct_Roof 0.089 1.290 Purlins 0.089 -1.290 Purlins, Gable Extension Interior Roof 0.089 -1.290 Panels 9.626 0.089 40894 Long Bracing. Building 1073 -0.537 Long Bracing, Wall Edge Zone 1073-0537 0394 Long Bracing, Facia/Parapet EDGE/ CORNER ZONE (MM) 2250 LOCAL COEFF.(INCL INT SUCT 4 -2.05 RATIO LOCAL TO AVERAGE, 1.42108 Right 0.55 0.90 “144 02 Surface Friction 0 0 0 0 Rajaramngar,3.2. Load combinations: . Load combination of strength: Te. (D.L¢L Ly" 541,05 *C.L. 2. (DLAW.LS P15 3. DLAW.RP)S 4. (DLW RSLS (DLAW.PP)LS 6. (DLAWP.S)PL5 Te (DLAL.LIM1.241,05°C.L40.6" WLP, 8. (D.L+L.LI*1.241.05°C.L06" WLS. 9. (DL +LLy1.241,05°C L406" WR. 10.0D.L+L.Ly"l2+1,05°C. L406" W.R.S. LL (D.L4L.L11.2+1,05°C.L40.6" WP. 12. (D.L4L.L)°1.241,05°C.L406" WPS, b. Load combination of serviceability: 1. (DLAL LCL)" 2. DLN IH LLACLAW.LP)08 3. DLP IH LLACLAW.LS)8. 4. DL" HLL AC.LAW RP)"O8 5. DLP IH LLACLAW.RS.)"O8 6. D.L* 1HLLACLAW PPS. 7. DL" IH{LLAC.LAW.PS.)°0.8 8. (LAWL) 9. (DLAW.LS)*1 10. (D.LAW.RP.)*1 LL (D.LAW.RS.)"1 12, (D.L+W.P.P.)*1 13. (D.L+W.PS.)*1 Rajaramngar.‘Table 4 Partial Safety Factors for Loads, 7, for Limit States (Clauses 3.5.1 and $3.3) Lie State of Serene Limit State of Servceaility rr a Leading Accompanying wu w Los 10 DisLbaChe 2 Los on Wie 0 De WL P is = DLOER 2 = Del LeAL ass lo - ‘When nlon of flees iv late bs semascowsly comers, the enon Wve land all be comida be the ane easing tat igher loa effets in he suanbeanes tot "TWis vase bw be considoed when the dead tod comtnbotes my stabiity against avertrsing is critical OF the dead tod oases Fructose def ahead Abbreviation [Di= Dont bo [= lene Sa (Live los, WL. = Wiad oa, CL = Cre hal (Verical/Mewigpsa), AL = Ascent lad, ER = sco ba El. = Baa bad NOTE — The effcos of ows (loads) intra of stress or tes estas may be oteited ham at approve met! of ana, RI.T,Rajaramngar.Chapter 4 ENTAL = ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY Staad .Pro. design steps: Rajaramngar.Rajaramngar.Chapter 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION RUT,Rajaramngar.Rajaramngar.Chapter 6 CONCLUSIONS AND SCOPE FOR FUTURE STUDAlphabetic sequences Aithraju, V.R., and Avedill, R.C. (1999). °C zig-zag finite element for analysis of laminated composite beams”, ASCE Journal af Engineering Mechanics, 128(3),323-331 Allik, H. and Hughes, TLR. (1970), “Finite element method for pieaoelectiic vibration”, bnternurional Jourmal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2, 151-157 Aluy, G. and DokmeTubular Structure, Technology Exchunge Center in Heilongjiang Province, Chim, 112-118 http://www library.ve.edu.au/training /eltation/vanco uv. péf ary.ug.edu.au/training/citation/harvard_6,pdt http://www. lib.monash.edu.au/tutorials/eiting/vancouver. html htto:// www. library.dmu.ac uk/Images/Selfst udy/Hary ard, slibrary.uow.edu.au/cont ups, reb/@health/do-cuments/dioc/um RI-T,Rajaramngar.ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of enormous help in the development of this work, Pro£P.M.Mohite my supervisor, philosopher and encouraged us to carry this, ‘work, His continuous invaluable knowledgubly guidance thraughout the course of this study helped me ta complete the work up to this stage and hope will continue in further research. In addition, very energetic and competitive atmosphere of the Civil Engineering Department ‘had much to do with this work. [acknowledge with thanks to faculty, teaching and non-teaching staff of the department, Central library and Calleagues. I sincerely thank to Dr.S.8.Kulkarni, for supporting me to do this work and Iam very much obliged to her Last but not the least my futher, my mother, constantly supported me for this work in ull aspects RIT Sakhrale, Shubham vilas parab- 1202016 Akshay ashok nikam 1202019 Aniketkisan mane 1202030 Sujit hanmant sonwalkar 1202015 Rajaramngar.