THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE VARIOUS TEACHING ACTIVITIES IN SELECTED PRESCHOOLS AT HAMIRPUR TEHSIL (U.P) INDIA: A COHORT STUDYDr. Kamlesh Rajput

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Page Nos.

22-26

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE VARIOUS TEACHING


ACTIVITIES IN SELECTED PRESCHOOLS AT HAMIRPUR TEHSIL
(U.P) INDIA: A COHORT STUDY
Dr. Kamlesh Rajput*

In terms of human development, the importance of early childhood education cannot be underestimated.
Early child development is seen as a critical framework for lifelong learning and learning, including cognitive and
social development. The study was conducted in one district, Hamirpur, Uttar Pradesh. Objective: The researcher
sought to define perceptions of the engagement of teachers and parents, physical facilities, teaching aids, book
preferences influencing the standard of pre-school education. Methodology: The retrospective analysis was a
cohort study. It was performed in Hamirpur District by four separate tehsils for pre-school children 3-4 years after
the pre-school principal had been given permission. All data was obtained by using a self-structured
questionnaire cum interview process. Finding: A statistically relevant measure was taken at level P <0.05. No
significant differences in the mean score of physical facilities were observed in Rath and Hamirpur tehsils in the
mean score of the teacher-child relationship, no substantial differences were observed in the mean score of the
study method between the schools of Moudaha with Sarila and Rath tehsils and Sarila with Rath tehsil. There have
been important differences in the mean book preference score between the Rath and Hamirpur schools.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of the report, parents and educators should remember to have a motivating
learning environment for pre-school children. Provides an enhanced immersive learning environment in
preschools.
Keywords: preschools, physical facilities, teaching aids, study methods, book preferences, parent involvement,

Introduction age group 1 to 6 years of age are expected to develop


and expand as preschoolers in the field of academics.
Preschool is an early education environment in
To provide a holistic development similar to cognitive,
which children incorporate learning with playing in a
social, expressive and interactive skills or, in general,
programme run by highly trained adults. Children are
to the development of children with a variety of
most often enrolled in preschool between the ages of
maturities and knowledge in a child, such as
three to six, although some schools can be attended by
considerable, emotional, exciting, mental, ethical, fine
as young as two (Vikram & Chindarkar, 2020).
motor, gross motor, verbal communication, education,
Darling-Hammondet al. (2020) explained that Pre-
admiration, reaction, etc., with other individuality built
primary education can be described as "a collection of
up at this point. Promoting an intelligence of self-
knowledge along with skills and experience, as well as
determination and an encouraging personal
behavioural rules that are important for effective
resemblance among the general public is also rising. To
management in daily life and at school." This is
take care of the approval and appreciation intended for
obtained by a child care institution. Children under the
others in the light of the value for adults and the

*Assistant Professor, B.N.V, P.G College, Rath (Uttar Pradesh, India)

22
affection for youngsters produced among the children. used to pick a sample. The Tehsil selected is made up
Prabha et al (2019) described that pre-primary school of 20-30 pre-schools. The investigator has prepared a
– Pre-primary education in India is offered to children list of all preschools. After planning the preschool lists,
between 3 and 6 years of age through kindergarten, the investigator then randomly selected 15 preschools
play way or playschool. These schools have different each from the selected tehsil. Thus, 60 pre-schools (15
terms for different grades, starting with – Pre-Nursery, pre-schools each from Tehsil Moudaha, Sarila, Rath
Nursery, KG, LKG (Lower Kindergarten) and UKG and Hamirpur) were the knowledge unit for this report.
(Upper Kindergarten).According to the 2011 census,
The investigator then received prior permission
there were more than 16.5 crore children in the 0-6 age
from the principal of the selected schools to provide all
group. In this segment of the population, there were
the information on the school. The investigator
some 33,000 pre-schoolers in India as of 2015. These
approached the class teacher of selected pre-schools for
figures could only have gone up. It is also unsurprising
this reason. Self-structured questionnaire cum
that the pre-school sector is booming in India. It
interview used for data collection. This cohort study
contributes around USD 32 billion to the GDP of the
was performed from 2008 to 2011.
country[ 4]. This study conducted to examine the
relationship between teacher and child relationship, Criteria for Sample Selecting:
physical faculties, the method used for teaching, 1. The sample consists of pre-schools having
children parent involvement, teaching aid used in children of 3-4 years range.
teaching, book preferences. 2. Pre-school had at least 25 children.
Methodology Results and discussions
This study was conducted in the Hamirpur The objective of the present study was to
district of Uttar Pradesh. In the first point, the compare and evaluate the different activities in selected
Hamirpur district of Uttar Pradesh was selected as schools according to Hamirpur tehsil (physical
convenient to the investigator. The Hamirpur district facilities, teacher-child relationship, method of study,
consists of four Tehsil districts, namely Moudaha, parent participation, teaching aid use, book reference).
Sarila, Rath and Hamirpur, all of which were selected
based on the need for research in the second level. A
multi-stage stratified random sampling technique was
Table 1: Mean score of physical facilities in selected preschools according to tehsil.

Statistical Values
Schools Physical Facilities
Tehsil
Moudaha Sarila Rath Hamirpur

No Mean SD t-test t-test t-test t-test


Moudaha 15 4.07 1.00 < 0.05 1.003 1.669 0.583
Sarila 15 3.73 0.85 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.874 0.443
Rath 15 3.40 1.19 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 1.230
Hamirpur 15 3.87 0.88 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
Total 60 3.77 1.01

Table1: depicts the mean tehsil score of physical 3.77, which was higher in the schools of Moudaha
facilities ( Instructional facilities, Drinking water tehsil (4.07), followed by the schools of Hamirpur
facilities,in selected schools. The mean score of tehsil (3.87) and the minimum (3.40) in the schools of
physical facilities for the total selectedschools was Rathtehsil.
23
Statistically, no major differences in the mean score of On the other side, all the preschools were well
physical facilities were observed between the schools equipped with all of these services.
of Moudaha, Sarila, Rath and Hamirpur tehsils, even at
Dadid (2017) noted the 71.17% of teachers said
a 5% level of significance.
drinking water was not at all hygienic. The majority of
Manhas & A Qadiri (2010) observed observed from teachers use minor physical activities such as running,
the schedule reflect that none of the anganwadis had a running, outdoor sports, etc. Just 1.5% use indoor and
laundry area and only 26.6 per cent had toilet facilities. outdoor sports such as soccer, watching, slide, and
playing soccer.
Table 2: Mean score of parents involvement in selected schools according to tehsil.

Parents Statistical Values


Schools
Tehsil Involvement
Moudaha Sarila Rath Hamirpur
No Mean SD t-test t-testv t-test t-test
Moudaha 15 4.33 0.47 < 0.05 1.874 1.352 0.310
Sarila 15 3.93 0.68 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.254 1.052
Rath 15 4.00 0.82 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 1.420
Hamirpur 15 4.40 0.71 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
Total 60 4.17 0.71

Table 2 shows the mean score of parents Statistically, significant differences regarding
involvement in selected schools according to tehsil. the mean score of parents involvement were not
The mean score of parents involvement for the total observed between the schools of Moudaha, Sarila, Rath
selected schools was found to be 4.17 which was more and Hamirpur tehsils even at 5% level of significance.
in the schools of Hamirpur (4.40), followed by the
schools of Moudaha tehsil (4.33) and minimum (3.93)
was in the schools of Sarila tehsil.
Table 3: Mean score of teaching aids used in selected schools according to tehsil.

Statistical Values
Schools Teaching Aids
Tehsil Moudaha Sarila Rath Hamirpur

No Mean SD t-test t-test t-test t-test

Moudaha 15 3.00 0.89 < 0.05 2.402* 1.678 0.000

Sarila 15 2.27 0.77 < 0.05 < 0.05 1.010 2.665*

Rath 15 2.53 0.62 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 1.901

Hamirpur 15 3.00 0.73 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Total 60 2.70 0.82

24
Table 3 demonstrates the mean score of Rajapaksha (2015) reported that the majority (85 per
teaching aids used by Tehsil in selected schools. The cent) of teachers strongly believe that the use of
mean score of teaching aids used in the total selected teaching aids is significant, while 5 per cent of the
schools was 2.70, which was higher in the schools of sample has no idea about it. 50 per cent of the sample
Moudaha and Hamirpur tehsils (3.00) each, followed teachers reported that most of the time they used
by the schools of Rath tehsil (2.53) and the minimum teaching aids and 45 per cent occasionally used
(2.27) in the schools of Sarila tehsil. teaching aids, while 5 per cent did not use teaching aids
at all.
Statistically, there were substantial differences
in the mean score of teaching aids between the schools Jadid (2017) has confirmed that 7.22% of teachers use
of Sarila with Moudaha and Hamirpur tehsils (p<0.05). a combination practised in schools as a justification for
However, no substantial differences in the mean score the focus on 3R, 22.89 percent of teachers have shown
of teaching aids were observed between the schools of that it is decided by the course of study/syllabus, and
Rath with Moudaha and Sarila tehsils and Rath with the majority (67.46%) of teachers have responded to
Hamirpur Tehsil even at a 5% level of significance. the pre-school.

Table 4: Mean score of preference for books in selected schools according to tehsil.

Statistical Values
Schools Preference of Books
Tehsil
Moudaha Sarila Rath Hamirpur
No Mean SD t-test t-test t-test t-test
Moudaha 15 6.47 0.88 < 0.05 0.588 1.659 0.602
Sarila 15 6.27 0.98 < 0.05 < 0.05 1.057 1.141
Rath 15 5.87 1.09 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 2.153*
Hamirpur 15 6.67 0.94 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
Total 60 6.32 1.01

Table 4 represents the mean book preference give children's books, whereas most pre-school books
score for selected schools based on Tehsil. The mean were available (75 percent ). Some of the anganwadis
book preference score for the total selected schools was (15 per cent) had books included in the Social Welfare
6.32, which was higher in the Hamirpur Tehsil schools Department's education package, which included books
(6.67), followed by the Moudaha tehsil schools (6.47) on literacy and numeracy.
and the minimum (5.87) in the Rath tehsil schools.
Conclusion
Statistically, there were substantial variations
in the mean book preference score between the Rath The objective of this study was to identify
and Hamirpur schools (p<0.05). However, no factors that affect skills among pre-school children.
substantial differences in the mean book preference Physical facilities, teacher-child relationship, study
score between the schools of Moudaha with Sarila, method, parent involvement, use of teaching aids and
Rath and Hamirpur and Sarila with Hamirpur and Rath book preferences have been better identified in
tehsils were observed even at a 5% level of Hamirpur tehsil. Most schools had an authoritarian
significance. approach of teachers to children, followed by a
permissive approach. No school in the district had the
Manhas & Qadiri (2010) evidently found democratic and inconsistent approach of Teachers
from data that most of the angelwadis (85%) did not towards children.
25
Conflict of Interest Statements 6. Dadid, M. D. (2017) .A study of preschool
education in Barpeta and Bongaigaon districts
I declare that I have no conflict of interest at all.
of Assam. Phd thesis
References ,http://hdl.handle.net/10603/194749.
1. Vikram, K., & Chindarkar, N. (2020). Bridging 7. Graves Jr, S. L., & Howes, C. (2011). Ethnic
the gaps in cognitive achievement in India: the differences in social-emotional development in
crucial role of the integrated child development preschool: The impact of teacher child
services in early childhood. World relationships and classroom quality. School
Development, 127, 104697. Psychology Quarterly, 26(3), 202.
2. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook- 8. Yoleri, S. (2016). Teacher-child relationships
Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). in preschool period: The roles of child
Implications for educational practice of the temperament and language skills. International
science of learning and development. Applied Electronic Journal of Elementary
Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. Education, 9(1), 210-224.
3. Prabha, K., Maithreyi, R., Sinha, P., Viknesh, 9. Rajapaksha, P. R., & Chathurika, P. R. D.
A., & Sriprakash, A. (2019). examining (2015). Problems Faced by Preschool Teachers
contexts, practices and costs of early childhood When Using Teaching Aids in the Teaching
care and education in india. Learning Process. International Journal of
4. https://www.indiatoday.in/education- Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1).97-102.
today/featurephilia/story/5-key-ways-to- 10. Vellymalay, S. K. N. (2011). A study of the
improve-indian-pre-schools-so-we-can-raise- relationship between indian parents' education
empowered-citizens-the-world-needs-in- level and their involvement in their children's
future-1559781-2019-07-01. (accessed on 5th education. Kajian Malaysia: Journal of
March 2021) Malaysian studies, 29(2). 47–65
5. Manhas, S., & Qadiri, F. (2010). A 11. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_file
comparative study of preschool education in s/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
early childhood education centers in (accessed on 5th March 2021)
India. Contemporary Issues in Early
Childhood, 11(4), 443-447.

26

You might also like