Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Puente Cinta
Puente Cinta
Puente Cinta
Pedestrian Bridges
12.1 lntroduction ................ ......................................................................463
12.2 Structural Arrangement ................................................................. 466
Stress Rjbbon • Structural Arnngcment of
the Ot.'(:k • Structural Arrangemcnt al Picrs ;md
Abut.nems • Transferring Stress Ribbon Force into the Soil
12.3 Erection ................. .............................................................................477
Construe~jon Scquences A • Construction Sequences 6
12.4 Stat ic a nd Dynamic Analysis .......................................................... 479
Single Cable • A nalysis of Stress Ribbon as a Cable • Analysis
of the Stress RibbOfl as a Geo.netrically Non·Linear St ruct ure
• Dynamic Analysis • Oesi,gni1lgofStructural Mc.nbers
• éxample of the Analysis
12.5 Stress Ribbon Supported by Aren ................................ .............. .. .. 495
12.6 Exa m pies ............................................................................................ 498
DS·L Bridgcs: Bridge across thc Vltava River in Prnguc·Troja,
Czcch Rcpublic • Sacramento River Trail Bridge. Rcdding,
CaUfornia • lake Hodges Btidge, San Diego, Califor1'\ia • Bridge
across the Medway River~ Maidstone, KeJlt, UK • Kikko Bridge,
)iri Strasky Japao • Btidge across 1he Ex-ptessway R35 Jtear Olornouc, Czech
Sttasky. Hust}' twd Republic • McLoughlin Boulev;ITd Bridge, Portland, Oregon
Partllers. Ltd. References ...................................................................................................... 514
12.1 Introduction
"What would be the best bridge? Well, the one wh ich could be reduced toa th.r ead, a line. without
anything left over; which fulfilled s trictly its function of uniti ng two separated distances."
Pablo Picasso
Stress-ribbon bridge is the tenn that has been coined to describe structures fonned by directly walked
prestressed concrete deck with the shape of a catenary. The conception was tirst introduced by Ulrich
Finsterwalder, wbo repeatedly proposed such a structure for bridging largespans (Walther 1969; Straskl'
2011). Among the bridges suggested they were those over Bosporus (see Figure 12.1), Lake Geneva and
Zoo in Kéiln.
The load-carrying structure consists of slightly sagging tensioned cables, bedded in a very thin con-
crete slab compared with the span length. This slab serves as a deck, but apart from distributing the load
local! y a nd preserving thc continuity it has no othcr function. lt is a kind of suspcnsion structure where
the cables are tended so tightly that the traffic can be placed directly on the concrete slab embedding the
463
Copyng ted ratenal
464 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Supersuucwre Design
cables. Compared with otber structuraltypes its load path is extremely simple. On the otber band, tbe
force in the cables is ver y large making the aochoring of the cable ver y expeosive.
The stress ribbon structures combine a structural form of primitive bridges formed by ropes from
liana or bamboo with the structural arrangement of prestressed suspended roofs. 'lbe characteristic
feature of the stress ribbon structures is a variable slope that disqualified using of this structural type
for highway bridges.lt is difficult to imagine that the structure preseoted in Figure 12.1 would be accept-
able for higbwayagencies. A stress ribbon structure might represen! a right solutioo only in specialcases
when the bighway is straight and the profile is a concave (sag) curve. On the other h and, the variable
slope is acceptable or even advantageous for pedestrian bridges built in a countryside where there is no
straight line.
The first stress ribbon bridge built for the public was designed by Pro f. Walther across the freeway N3
near Pfáfikon, Switzerland in 1965 (Walther 1969). From that time the stress ribbon bridges were built
in many countries all ovcr the world. In the Un ited States the first stress ribbon bridge of span of 127m
(417ft.) was built in 1990 across the Sacramento River in Redding, CA (Redfield and Strasky 1992) (see
Figure 12.2).
..
. ,, ...
Copynghted mat0nal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 465
'Ibe stressribbon structures can be designed with one or more spans and are characterized by soeces·
sive and complementary smooth curves. The curves blend into the surrou nding envi ronment and their
forms, tbe most simple and basic of struclural solutions, d early arliculate the flow of interna! forces.
'lbeir fine d imensions also correspond lo a hu man scale.
lt is evident that the stress ribbon slructu re represenls tbe simples! struclural form. Both eng.i neering
and aesthetic beauty of this bridge type Hes in the fael that tbe suspended walkway itselfis lhe structure.
11 ca rries itself without the need for any a rms, props. masts, cables, d ampers, and so on. Its stiffness and
stabilily result from its geometry.
Such structures can be eíther cast in-sítu or formed of precast units. 1n the case of precasl structures,
the deck ís assembled from precast segments that are suspended on bearí ng cables and sh ífted along
tbem to their final posít íon (see Figure 12.3}. Preslressíng ís applied after castíng the joínts between tbe
segments lo ensu re sufficient rigidity of the structtLres.
The maín advanlage ofthese structurcs is thal they have mínima! e nvironmental impact because lhey
use very little material and can be erected indcpende ntly from the existing terrai n. Since they do not
need bearings or expansion joints lhey need o nly minimallong-term maintenance.
They are able Lo resist not o nly uniformly d istributed load buL also la rge concentrated loads c reated
by the wheels ofheavy trucks (Strasky 1987a) (see Fig ure 12.4}. Ex tremely large floods lhat occu rred
in the Czech Republic in summer 1997 a nd 2002 also confirmed that they are able 10 resista large
ultimate load. Ahhough the bridge was totally nooded, the ir static function remains without any
changes.
Even tbough the stress ribbon structures bave low natural frequencies, ou r experience confi rmed
tbat the speed of motion of tbe deck created by walking is within acceptable limits. Also our detailed
dynamic test confirmed thal vanda ls cannot damage these Slructures.
Although lbe above structu res have a ver y simple shape, theí r design is nol straigbtforwa rd.lt requi res
a deep understandiog of slructural forms, functíon of structural detaíls and behavior of prestressed
concrete slructures posHensioned by interna! and/or externa! tendons. Also the slatic and dynamic
analysís requíres understandíng of the function of cables and resolves varíous problems in regard to
both geometric a nd materíalnon-linearity.
FIGURE 12.3 Erection ofthe bridge across the Sacramento River in Redding, CA.
Copynghted mat0nal
466 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstructure Design
FIGURE 12.4 Loading test ofthe bridge across the Vltava River in Prague-Troja, Czech Republic.
g = 5 kN/m (0.343 kip/ft.} and the horizontal force H8 = 3094 kN (696 kip).
2. Concrete panels of 125 mm (5 in.) th ickness a re supported by two cables with a total area of
A,= 0.0252 m' (39 in.1 ).
3. A concrete band of 125 mm (S in.) thickness is supported by two cables with a total area of
A, = 0.0252 m' (39 in.'). The cables are embedded in the band that is fully prestressed and there-
fore uncracked.
4. A concrete band of 125 mm (S in.) thickness is supported by two cables with a total area of
A, = 0.0252 m' (39 in.'). The cables are embedded in the band that is partially prestressed and
therefore cracks can form in tne concrete. lt is assumed that the crack spacing is 125 mm (5 in.)
and that the concrete between cracks resists resistance of the tension. Tbe area of concrete tnat
resists the tension to taken as shown in Figure 12.7b-4.
Copynghl d mat0nal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 467
(a)
(b)
(e)
(d)
S. A concrete band of250 mm (!O in.) th ick ness is supported by two cables with a tota l area of A,=
0.0392 m ' (67.6 in. 2) . The cables are embedded in the band that is fui! y prestressed and therefore
uncracked.
Struc tures 2- 4 are stressed by a dead load g = 17 kN/m (1.165 kip/ft.) with corresponding horizontal
force H8 = 10,519 kN (2,365 kip). Structure 5 is stressed by a dead load g = 33.345 kN/m (2.286 kip/ft.)
with corresponding horizontal force H 8 = 20,635 kN (4,639 kip). The contribution of the prestressing
tendons and reinforcing steel to the tension s tiffness of the band is neglected in structures 3-5.
The A,= A,+ E/E, A, = A, + 3~ A, . above structures were analyzed for the elfec ts of the dead load
95
g and live load p = 20 kN/m (1.371 kip/ft.) placed on one half of the s tructure. TI1e analysis was per-
formed for the structure modeled as a cable of effective tension stiffness E,A, and zero bending stiffness.
The effective stift'ness E,A, was determ ined from the modulus of elasticity of the cable E, = 195,000 MPa
(28,000 ksi) and an etfective area A, that depends on the area of the cable A, a nd concrete band A, (or
A,,,~ respectivcly) as well as the ratio ofthe modulus of elasticity ofsteel E, and concrete E"
Copynghted mat0nal
468 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
-
IIIJ!i l illliliU!il p q g+p
-
U UI IJUIIIUIJII 11 11 1111 11 (il 1 ll l ll S
X
NwN H, , H,
"
w ]m] (e)
x ]m]
2
:- ll
: t=l25mm
![ ;
- 0.20
¡ t= 125 mm _
3 -
0.00
~
1~ ~ i/ r=
5 /
0.20
FE
3 4 125 mm
0.40 ~' 4
f;::?' /) 31 1 1
0.60 ~ /__ '/
\ 5
¡t=250 mm_
0.80
1.00 \ J
1.20
0.00 49.50 99.0
(a) (b)
FIGURE 12.7 Stiff'ness of the stress ribbon structure: (a) load a nd deformation and (b) diff'erent types of stress
ribbons structures.
Resulting deformations presented in Figure 12.7 shows that the fully prestressed band of thickness of
250 mm (lO in.) has the smallest d eformations. Also fltlly and partially prestressed structures 3 and 4
of thickness of 125 mm (S in.) have reasonable deformations. Although the deformations of structures
1 a nd 2 could be reduced by substituting the cables with strips of structural steel that have lower allow-
able stresses and therefore requires a la rger cross section, the deformations are still significan!.
It is evident that the prestressed concrete deck (fully or partially prestressed) has a superior bchavior.
1l1e monolithic concrete deck gives the structure not only sufficient tension stiffness but its membrane
stiffness also guarantces the transverse stiffness of the bridge. These structures are furthcr called stress
ribbon structures.
Stiffening of the suspension structures by tension cables of the opposite curvature (see Figure 12.6c)
has simi lar effects to the stiffening of the structure dead load (see Figure 12.6b). However, this arrange-
ment requires complicated connect ions of the cables and good maintenance.
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 469
n''''UPer.
x:::::::: A ., ~
~------ÁL~",
-~---_-_-_-_-_-_-77
(a)
Dlll lllfiP
(b)
Prestressing applied after the casting of the whole band. or the joints between the segmeots, guara otees
the structural integrity of the complete deck.
1be s tnJCtul'al arrangement of the stress ribbon bridges is determined by theiT static function and
by their process of construction. During the erectioo the s tructure acts as a perfectly flexible cable (see
Figure 12.8a), during service as a prestressed band (stress ribbon) that is stressed not only by normal
forces but also by bending moments (see Figure 12.8b). However, the shape and the stresses in the struc-
ture at the end of the erection determine the magnitude of the stresses that will occur in the structure
during the service.
Although a prestressed band can resist very heavy loads it can be very slender (see Figure 12.4). In
order to undcrstand the behavior ofthe stress ribbon structures, the bending moments in the deck dueto
prestressing, live load, and temperature changes are shown in Figure 12.9. The structure has a span of99m
(325ft.); its sag is 1.98 m (6.50 ft.). Thedeck is thc samc as the deckofthestructure studicd in Figure 12.7(5).
The concrete band of modulus of elasticity of E,= 36,000 MPa (522 ksi) had section propcrties taken from
a basic rectangular section ofa width of5.00 m (16.4 ft.) anda depth of0.25 m (0.82 ft.).
The deck was suspended on bearing tendons of area A,.~, = 0.0196 m' and post-tensioning was applied
with tendons of arca A,,p, = 0.0196 m 2•
TI1e horizontal force H8 dueto tbe dead load g = 33.345 kN/m (2.286 kip/ft.) is 17.30 MN (3889 kip). The
structure was loaded by dead load (1), temperature changes Al= +20 •e (2) and (3), live load p = 20 k.N/m
(1.371 kip/ ft.) on tbe whole (4) and balf(5) ofthespan and by a point load F= 100 kN (22.5 kip) at mid-span
(6). The structure was analyzed as a geometrically non-linear structme of the program system ANSYS
witbout aod witb post-teosioning of the deck witb a prestressing force P = 25.52 fvlN (5737 kip).
f igure 12.9a shows the position of the loadings, deformations and bending moments for the oon-
prestressed deck; Figure 12.9b for tbe prestressed deck.
From tbe presented results it is evident that significan! bending momeots origioate only at tbe sup-
ports. The beoding moments due to tbe concentrate load representing a typical maintenance car are
relatively very low. Since the deck is a lways post-tensioned, the negative beoding momeots at the sup-
ports are very low. However, positive bending moments are very large and h ave a significan! iniluence
on the detailing of the stress-ribbon structure at the supports.
Since a long the whole length of the structure the deck is stressed o nly by normal forces, the deck can
be formed by a very slender solid sectionthat can be further reduced by wa.JJ1es that creare a coftered sof-
fit. The mínimum arca ofthe deck is deternüned from the requirements that under the various loading
condition (including prestress) thcrc are li.mitcd or zero tcnsion stresses in the deck, and that maximum
compressive stresses are not exceeded. Since the bending moments due to the point load are low, the
Copynghted matenal
470 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
-
1 L41111 (411 1 ll 1 U 1111 tg 2111 l llll lll 1 !IU!Itll g 31 lll li 111 ll lUIJU lll g
Hg
-
H, H.,H
ót = +20'C
H,HH,H
M=-20'C
Hg,H
_....
M A-
+ ~ +
(a)
11 1 111 ' 1' 1¡ 1' 1' 1' 11 J11g 2111 ¡ 1' 1' 1' 1' 1¡ 1' 11 1' 1 g 31 1111 1 ' ' 11 J ' 11 1' 11 1' 1g
H,, H H,, H H0, H H,, HH• . H Hg, H
-- 6.t=+20"C ---. --+
M •
+V 1+
+r 1+ + +
o.o J.O 2.0 [MNm]
(b)
-1\..
M
+
A-
+ --
+
A-
(a)
IF
Hg, H
11111 uaa1tu u1111 r~ s:¡:¡:¡;¡:: :~ "'," n• s
H,, H~§' H
611
H,, H H,, H
"",,u t.,, JI", "s
H•, H
......,__ --..~ -......
M ..
+
0.0 1.0 2.0 [MNm)
(b)
FIGURE 12.9 Deformation and bending moments. (a) Without prestressing. (b) With prestressing.
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 471
depth of the deck is essentially determined by tbe cover requirements of the prestressing steel. Usually
the mínimum depth guarantees a sufficient stiffness of tbe deck.
The deck of stress ribbon structures ca n be casi in a form tbat is suspended on the bearing cables (see
Figure 12.10a) orbe assembled of precast segments. Usually the deck is suspended from bearing tendons
and is prestressed by prestressing tendons. However, the function ofbearing and prestressing tendons
can be combined as well. lnitially, the segments can be hung from bearing tendons situated in troughs,
and after erection tbe deck is post-tensioned by the second group of cables situated eitber in the ducts
within the segments (Figure 12.10b) or in the troughs (see Figure 12.10c). The bearing tendons are then
protected by a cast-in-place concrete poured simultaneouslywith the joints between the segments. Since
longitudinal shrinkage cracks are likely to occur between the cast-in-place and precast concrete, it is
recommended to protect the surface with a waterproof overlay.
TI1e deck can be a lso assembled from precast segments that hang on temporary erection cables that are
removed after post-tensioning ofthe deck with the interna! tendons (see Figure 12.JOd). Another system
utilizes externa! tendons to support and prestress the dcck (Figure 12.10f}. These externa! tendons either
can be uniformly distributed along the width of segment orbe situated el ose to the edges ofthe segments.
Another arrangement consists of precast segments with a composite slab (see Figure 12.10e). The seg-
ments are suspended on bearing tendons and serve as a false-work and formwork for the composite slab
that is cast simuhaneously with the segment joints. Both the precast segments and the composite slab are
posttensioned by tendons that are situated a long the bearing tendons within the cast-in-place slab. A
continuous deck slab without any joints provides a o excelleot protec tion to the prestressing steel and
requires minimum maiotenance.
Bearing tendon
Prestressing tc1'1don
_& o ooor: 00 ~
-- --- -! --
--::J
(a)
r - - Bearing tendon
-
~! ~restressing tendon
. . . . . .
~ ~ .
(b)
--
•
(e)
Í Erectional a~ble
b Bearing and prestressing tendon
~ · a.• • • IJ
(d)
(e)
Copynghted matenal
472 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
Usually tbe bearing tendons consist of s trands that are protected by tbe posHensioned concrete of tbe
trough s or composite slab. The prestressing tendons a re formed by strands grouted in a trad itional duct.
lf a higher degree of protection is required, the bearing tendons can a lso be made from stra nd s grouted
in ducts or both bearing and prestressing tendons can be made from monostrands additionally grouted
in PE (polyethylene) ducts.
L L
•
Flexible material
1
(al (b)
FIGURE 12.11 Abutments: (a) support with a saddle and (b) suppon with a short haunch.
1
FlexJble material
L, L,
(a) (b)
FIGURE 12.12 lntennediate piers: (a) support with a saddle and (b) support with a short haunch.
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 473
Steel sadd le
(b)
(e)
(e)
FIGURE 12. 13 Erection of the stress ribbo n at intermediate piers: (a) cast in place deck supported by saddles, (b)
cast in place baun ch, (e) prccast dcck, (d) cast in place dcck, and (f) Tcflon platcs.
Copynghted mat0nal
474 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstructure Design
Figu re J2.13c shows a solution in whicb the abutment and pier haunches were casi in place before the
erection of tbe segments. The ducts, in wbich the bearing tendons are placed, have to allow a change of
slope duril1g the construction of the deck. A closure was therefore provided between the sadd les and
the segments.
The ma in advantage ofthesolution shown in Figure 12.J 3b is that the shape ofthe saddle can beeasily
adjusted according to the geometry of the aiready erected deck that is dependen! not on ly on the value
of tbe initial stressi ng and actual weight of segments, but also on the temperature at tl1e time of casting.
Although the described measures can sig nificantly reduce the bending stresses, it is necessary to
carefully design the stress ribbon in the vicinity of the supports. For designing of the ribbon, the posi-
tive bending moments that cause tension stresscs at bottom fibers are critic.al. Since the bearing and
prestressing tendons are situated a sufficient distance away from the bottom fibers it is possible to accept
cracks there and design the ribbon as a partial post-tensioned member in which crack width and fatigue
stresses in the reinforcement are checked. If the ribbon above the saddle is assembled from precast
members, it is necessary to guarantee compression in the joi nts. This can be provided with add itional
short tendons situated in the pier segments.
Copynghl d mat0nal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 475
(e)
N
M
N
(a) (e)
FIGURE 12.17 lnstallation of rock anchors: (a) anchor system, (b) post-tensioning of the first half ofthe rock
anchors, (e) cree tío o of thc dcck, (d) post·lensioning of thc sccond half of the rock anchors, and (e) bridge in ser vice.
ln Figure 12.17 the footing is pwvided with a shear key. Therefore the resistance against sl iding has to
be checked at the bottom of the key. The safet y against slid ing:
s= V· tgcp+Ac
H
where Vq ís a vertica l force from the dead and líve load, Hq ís the horizontal componen! of the force in
the stress ribbon, q> is the angle of interna) fríction of the soíl, A the are a of the footing al the leve) of the
key ande is the cohesíon .
The factor of safety against sliding s0 depends o n national codes and typically varíes from 1. 5 lo 2.0.
The factor ofsafety has to be dctermincd for all s tages of1he construction. In general, it is impossiblc
to post-tension all rock a nchors befo re erection of the deck, s ince the horizontal force H•• is too large and
can cause sl iding oflhe footing in the direction of the post·tensioning. Therefore, the post-tension ing is
usually done in two stages a nd the safety againsl sliding has to be checked for !he following:
l. Post-tensíon ing of the first half of the rock anchors (see Figure J2 .J7b).
2. Erectíon ofthe deck (see Figure 12.17c).
Copynghted matenal
476 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
3. Post-tensioning of the second half of the rock anchors (see Figu re 12.17d).
4. Serviceofthe bridge, fu ll hve load and temperatu re d rop (see FigUJ·e 12.17e).
The use of rock or ground anchors requires a soil with adcquate bearing capacity to resist no t
on ly the pressure from the stress ribbon, but also t hc prcssure from thc vertical component of the
anchor force.
lf there is insufficient capacity, drilled shafts can be used to resist both the vertical and horizontal
components of the stress ribbon force. Although the drilled shafts have a relatively large capacity for
resist ing in a horizontal force, Lheir horizontal deformations are significan! a nd it is necessary to con-
sider them in tbe analysis. Elastic horizontal deforma!ions ca n be eliminated with an erectio n process in
wh ich tbe structure is pre -loaded before tbe casting of the closu re joints. Nevertheless, with time plas-
tic deformations can cause considerable horizontal displacements o f tbe abutments that consequently
cause a n increase of the sag of the stress ribbon.
An elegant solution is presented in Figure 12.18 in which the stress ribbon is supported by battered
micropiles. They transfer the load from the stress ribbon into the soil because of their tension and com-
pression capacity. TI1e maximum tension in the pites occurs in at the last row where the tension force
from to horizontal force "T1 is increased by a tension force coming from the uplift (V1) created by the
vertical force V and bending moment M.
V M
V. =- - ± -Z;
ti 1
f= I ;zt
where n is number of micropiles, and z1 is distance of tbe micropile from the center of gravity of the
micropile g roup.
v~r, v,
V i
fl¡
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 477
12.3 Erection
One of the main ad,•antages of the stress ribbon structure is that the erection of the deck can be done
independently of tbe conditions of tbe terrain under the bridge since the formwork of precast seg¡nents
ca n be suspended from the bearing tendons.
Although there are sorne differences given by the arrangement of tbe stress ribbon above s upports,
they are two basic erection possibilities that aredistinguished by the arrangement ofthe bearing tendons.
(a)
(b)
(e)
Copynghted matenal
478 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
(a)
r B~aring lendon
t ! 1 1!
(b)
Trolley frame
rE~ear·ing tendon
(a)
-- -- --- -~
(b)
(e)
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 479
FIGURE 12.22 Bridge across the Med,•ay River. Maidstone. Kent, UK-erection of a segment.
o n erection cables that is attached to hauling and auxiliary rapes. Usi ng a winch, the segmcnt is
shifted along the erection cables into a pre-dctermincd position where it is liftcd until it touches
the bcaring tcndons. Thc hangcrs are then placed a nd secured. This process is repeated u nti l all
segments are assembled.
c. When all segments a re assembled the forms for of the closures are hung, and the prestressing
tendons and rebars a re placed. After that, the joints, sadd les, and troughs ora composite slab a re
cast (see Figu re 12.20c) and post-tensiooed. The remainder ofthis process is similar lo previously
described erection metbod.
Copynghl d mat0nal
480 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
El'ection stage
(a) T
t • As-r
a,_________
Bearing tendon BT
(e) 4
~
Ha Z : : .
g
__
Basic stage
.;;....__.,_;;.-..
(el
fftflffl
-Q- '-'t j"Presu·essing tendon PT
Setvice stage
(f)
wii~-"=...JI A,
(g)
h
tg~ = , (12.3)
For the given load q(x) and chosen horizontal force H the cable curve is determined by coordinate
y(x), sagf(x), by the slope of the tangent y'(x) = tgcp(x) and radius of the curvature R(x). These values are
derived from the general equilibrium conditions on the element ds.
The cable is stressed br a norma l force N(x) that has vertical and horizontal components V(x)
and H(x).
Copynghted matenal
Suess Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 481
1 ¡
N
h (12.8)
p(x ) = y'(x) = p0 (x)+ - = p0 (x ) +tgj3
1
e 1
482 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
M(x) h (12.10)
y(x)= +-x= f(x)+x tgf3
H 1
where Q(x) and M(x) are shear force and bending moment on s imple beam of the span l.
For q(x) = const.
/¡
p(x)= p0 (x) +- = p0 (x) +tgj3 (12.12)
1
s= J , dy-, = -1-+ -
' ds= J' ..jd:t-+ cosf3
-0 (12.14)
0 0 cosf3 2H
(12.16)
For the cable ofthe length 1, sagf, horizontal force H and uniform load q the length ofthe cable is
1 1 q'l' q'l'
S = 1+ -2H--
, -12- = + -::"
1 24'--H,-2 (12.17)
fl
for H = !l._
8f
s=l+ -
Sf' (12.18)
31
(12.19)
ds = t + y'
o
(1 2 (x))dx (12.20)
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 483
For the cable of the length 1, sagf, horizontal force H and uniform load q the length ofthe cable is
1 cos~ H0 1 1
ln=s0 -tls0 =--+--D- 0 - D0 (12.23)
cos~ 2H~ &leos'~ H0 EA
1
D0 = JQ1.o dx (12.24)
o
For the load q(x) 1, unknown horizontal force H 1 and the temperature t1 the length of the non-tension
cable:
D, = Jol_,dx (12.27)
•
where the tempera! u re change 61, = t1 - t0 and ex, is a coefficient of thermal expansion.
cos~
=- - R + - -, D,
1
S¡ (12.28)
cos'"' 2H1
H11 1
/ls.= D- + (12.29)
' EAcos ~ H.EA '
1
In ,-s, cos~
_ -• - _ 1
L),)~ - --+--
cos~D _ H 11 o, (12.30)
2H,l ' EAcos' ~ EAH,
a =.,..---:7
1
(12.32)
EAcos'~
Copynghted matenal
484 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
1
b= ln1 - - (12.33)
cos ~
D,
c= - (12.34)
EA
(12.35)
From this equation the unknown horizontal force H 1 can be easily solved.
ó~ =A¡or
Ll~~ = H 0fJ!' ó!f = Hl>~'
Ll~o = BoBX Llt; =B,B~
Ll~ = H0f5~ 6~ =H1 fJ~
depend on va lues of the reactions and positive un it deformations.
h¡
lo
1¡
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 485
For load 0:
(12.37)
(12.38)
(12.39)
For load i:
(12.40)
(12.4 1)
/t.
~,-- -1,'
t (12.42)
The elastlc deformations of the cable in the anchor blocks a and b for load 0:
A, •.0 = kH0
and load i:
where k= k. + k• express of the elongation of the cable at the anchor blocks a and b due to unit hori-
zontal force H = l.
5
..
k= J ••ds (12.43)
• EA
o
(12.44)
For the load q(x)0 , horizonta l force H 0 and temperature 10 the length ofthe non-tension cable:
ln=s-ru-6
0 0 0
=lo +cosf3oD-
0
Holo - l Do- kHo (12.45)
'"· cos 1-'0
<> 2Ho2
EA cos' "1-'0 H oEA
(12.46)
Copynghted matenal
486 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
For the load q(x) 1, unknowo horizontal force H, and the temperature t, the leogth of the non ·tension
cable:
(J 2.48)
J
11
D, = QLdx (12.49)
o
_ 1, )- cos~, D+ + kH 1+ D, -_ 0
(l '
H,l, (12.50)
EAcos' p,
ll· 1
cosP, 2Hf EAH,
lfwe denote
1
a= ' +k (12.51)
EA cos'P1
(12.52)
D,
c =- (12.53)
EA
d = cos P1 D. (12.54)
2 '
Since the members a, b, e, d depend on the spanl, and ''ertic.al d ifference lt, which again depend on
horizontal force H,, it is not possiblc to determine thc unknown H, directly by solving of the equation.
1l1erefore it is necessary to determ ine H, by iteration. First, the unknown H, is detem1ined for zero
deforrnation of supports and zero elongation ofthe cable at the anchor blocks. For this force the vertical
reac.tions A, and 8,, span length 1, and vertical difference h, and rnernbers a, b, e, d and new horizontal
force H,. The computation is repeated tillthe difference between the subsequent solutions is smaller than
the required accuracy.
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 487
N(x)
llllllillll q(x)
I\IU!IlltflltniHutPI,IlUtftfJI!IIfl g
X
~~
l (X) /¡
r>'f'") ·-......._,,'..)¡H..._H•- +
Í
~x)
V(x)+dV(x)
w
FIGURE 12.26 Geometry and interna] forccs at nexibly supportcd cable.
The portian ofthe cable can be s upported by Wi nkler's springs. The characteristic ofthe spring k(x} is
a "stress" that corresponds to its un it defo rmatioo.
Then the bending of the cable is g iven by
the particular solution wp(x} corresponds to deformation of the cable without bending stiffness; the
homogenous solution can be written as
(12.58)
A= {H {12.59)
fii
Direct solution is possible only for special cases (see Figure 12.27}. For example the course of the
bending moment M(x) in the vicinity of the support of the cable that is loaded by uniform loads g and
q and corresponding horizontal forces are Hg and H is solved for infinitively long cable. 111e bending
moment is given by an expression:
(12.60)
1ne bend ing moment ata n infi.nitively long cable loaded that is loaded by point load F and by uniform
load q is given by an expression:
F
M(x)= -e-h + Elt.q (12.61)
2A
Copynghted matenal
488 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
,,,,,,,,,,J,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"111!! 11111! "" J~ llil!l!ll ¡¡¡ 11111 q
..
ru uuuuu' ru trtrtr 1r1nr u un 1nr 1 tnr 1r 111r 1ru tr u 1r tnnr tnnnr ' " ' •· g
-X 1 X g_
<::::;:;;; • t • ~
00
¡ q,F
1
FIGURE 12.27 Bending moments (a) at support and (b) under pointload.
where
le= fE
fii
The author, rather than solve the equations for d ifferent loading cond itions, developed a program in
wb icb the deformation and corresponding shear forces a nd bendi ng moments were solved usingji11ite
difference method. This approach enables to express a local stilfening of the cable and s upporti og of por·
t ion of the cable by Win kler s prings.
1 H EAj2n2 Eln2
- -+ +-- (12.62)
J.l 1' 21'1 1'1
(12.63)
where H is the horizontal force, Mis the mass of the cable per unit length,fis the sag of the cable, E is
the modulus of elas ticity, A is the area and 1 is the moment of inertia.
The member (EAJ'n 2 )/2/ 4 in equation expresses the norma l stiffness ofthe cable that has t.o elongate
when vibrate in the first rnode. This is the reason why in some cases th e first mode is bigher tha n the
secondone.
The member (El1t2n 1 )!l' expresses the bendi ng stiffness of cable that is in engineering calculations
insignificant.
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 489
............... :._;?'
Ji,¡ -------
/(2)
(12.64)
The stresses in tbe beariog tendons are a lso alfected by their elongation in tl1e anchorage blocks and
by possible displacements of the end supports. The unknown horizontal force H 1 is given by an equation
that is used for the analysis of the simple cable.
•• "' 2H-1 ( /1 )
65= I,t.s.=Í:,
1
s.- (12.67)
EAcos~ 2cos~¡
1
¡.1 J• l
Copynghted matenal
490 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
1m 1 m 111 m 1m ulllllllllllllllllll111111lq
t:,H 6"
e
•
(a)
*
!+ 1f 1f u 1 11 1f lf JIU 1f 1f 1i 1f 1f 1f 11 1f JJ [ 11 i 11 Ji¡¡ 1¡ if! ; 1+g
1111111 m 1* l* l* liltl ulll lllI 1llllllllllll mq
a g
e
q
t:,H b 'IL
• l
(b)
FIGURE 12.29 Sta tic function: (a) stage of ereclion and (b) stage of service.
(12 .68)
~ 11
a = ,¿_, '' +k (12.69)
i=' EAcos ~¡;
1
m 1
b= ln - L, JJ (12.70)
' i=' cos~ iJ
- ~
C- ,¿_,-Di,J (12.7 1)
}=1 EA
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 491
for zero deformatioo of supports aod zero elongat ion of the cable at tbe anchor blocks. For this force tbe
vertical reactions A,, B,, aod R,; spao length 1;.; and wrtical difference 11¡.; members a, b, e, d and the new
horizontal force H,. are calculated. This iteration is repeated until the djiference between s ubsequent
solutions is smaller than the required tolerance.
This analysis should be repeated for all erection stages. The goal of the analysis is not only to deter-
mine the jacking force for the bearing tendons, but also the deformations of the structure and the cor-
responding stresses that alfect the substructure.
Copynghted matenal
492 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
-
(a)
BT bearing tendons
lllllllll P1' prcstressing tendons
//·-es composite slab
PS prt..'OI.St scgmcn ts
F
,.+ nr"
\\'f
(b)
FTGURE 12.30 Stress ribbon structure: (a) deformationand bending moments and (b) modeling ofthe deck.
TI1e analysis that starts from the basis stage ca11 be used for both the analysis of the erection and
service stages. TI1e stresses in the structure during erection and the bearing tendons jacking forces are
determine.d by simulating a progressive u nloading of the structure. Since the superposition principie
does not apply, the analysis of the service stage should be carried out according to the following flow
chart.
Figure 12.30 shows deformed shapes and bending moment (a), a nd a calculation model (b) of a one
spa n structure loaded by dead load, prestress, and creep and shri nkage of concrete. It is evident that due
to creep and shrinkage the sag is reduced and therefore all interna! forces are higher at time t_.
Furthermore, sin ce the area ofthe bearing and prestressing tendons is higher than in traditional con-
crete structures, a sign ifican! red istribution of stresses between steel and concrete occurs with time. 1n
structures assembled from precast segments and cast-in-place slab the redistribution of stresses between
these members also has to be considered.
fo r tbe analysis of the creep and shrinkage il is necessary to perform a li.me dependen! analysis
(Strasky et al. 2011). Jt is not possible to analyze tbe st ructure in a single step for tbe initial stra in
caused by creep and shrinkage. 'lhis would cause significantly la rger deformations and higher beod-
i.ng moments at the supports.
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 493
lt is obvious that rather than cbecking the natural modes and frequencies, a speed of motion or accel·
eration of the bridge deck caused by forced vibralion, which represen! S the effects of moving people,
shouJd be checked.
According lo (UKDOT 1988) the maximum vertical acceleration shou ld be calculated assuming that
the dy:namic loading applied by a pedestxian can be represented by a pulsating point load F, moving
across the ma in span of the superstructure ata constan! speed v, as follows.
F = 180·sin2nf0T (12.73)
v, = 0.9fo (12.74)
Copynghted matenal
494 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
Detall 'N
(b)
FIGURE 12 .31 Bridgeacross t he Medway River, Maidstone,Kem, UK: calculation model. (a) Local model, Detail
'A' and (b) global model.
37.500 49.500
1 1 ¡
L L.~I itii Hililll iJIII ! ill! i ! l l l fiU!i!IJiiiiii i iiii i i i i !I! I ! I IIII ! III IIIIIIIIID
DL+P+(-A + P+LLI
DL+P
P+(+<H)
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 495
fco=1.171 H<
FIGURE 12.33 Bridge across the Medway River, Maidstone, Kent, UK: natural modes and frequencies.
In this bridge the saddles were modeled by 30 beam elernentsof0.5 m leogth that had varyingdepth cor-
responding to that of the haunches. From the figures it is evideot that the calculatioo models can describe
the actual arrangement of the stress ribbon structures including their flexible connection to the soil.
Figure 12.32 presents the bending momeo! diagrams in the stress ribbon deck of the Maidstone
Bridge. Due to the arrangement of the prestressing tendons at the abutments and pier haunches. the
positive bending moments that usually appear at those locations were sigoificantly reduced . From the
natural modes and frequencies shown in Figure 12.33 it is evident that tllis complex structure vibrates
in compound modes. This also demonstrates the good behavior of this slender structure.
Tite forced vibration (Strasky, Necas, and Kolacek 2012) determined the maximum amplitude max
u= 3.710 mm (0.15 in.), maxinmm speed of rnotion max v = 0.031 mis (1.02 ft.ls} and maximum accel-
eration max a= 0.260 mfsl (0.85 ft.fs2). This value is smaller than limited acceleration a11m = 0.471 mJs2
(1.545 ft.fsl). Although the structure is extremely slender, and first bending frequencies are elose to 2Hz,
the users do not have an unpleasant feeling when standing or walking on the bridge.
Copynghted matenal
496 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
L R
(o)
HA HA
(e)
A Aal
l Lp
1
AV
LA
(d)
AV ~-.
1
AH
AV
l 1-p
1
AV
(e)
FIGURE \2.34 Stress ribbon supported by arcb: (a) stress ribbon and arcb, (b) stress ribbon, (e) arcb, (d) self-
anchored system, and (e) partially self-anchored system.
ln the initial stage the stress ribbon behaves as a two span cable supported by the saddle that is fixed
to the end abutments (see Figure 12.34b). The arch is loaded by its self-weight, the weight of the saddle
segments and the radial forces caused by the bearing tendons (see Figure 12.34c). After post tensioning
the stress ribbon with the prestressing tendons, the stress ribbon and arch behave as one structure.
The shape and initial stresses in the stress ríbbon and í11 the arch can be chosen such that the hori-
zontal forces in the stress ribbon H,. and in the arch H, are the same. lt is then possíble to connect the
stress ribbon and arch footings with compression s truts that balance the horizontal forces. The moment
created by horizontal forces H 50 ·1t is then resisted by the t.I'-L,.. In this way a self-anchored system with
only vertical reactions is created (see Figure 12.34d). This self-anchored system eliminares the anchor-
ing ofhorizonta l forces in the upper soil layers.
In some cases- dueto the slope limitations of tbe s tress ribbon- the deck has to have ver y s mall sag
and the corresponding horizontal force becomes very large. A supporting arch that would balance this
force would result extremely flat. lf the topography requires an arch of higher rise, it is then possible to
develop a partially self-anchored system.
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 497
Tbe arch is designed for an optim um rise and its corresponding horizontal force. This horizontal
force H, is then transferred by the inclined props into the stress ribbon's anchor blocks. 1be anchor
blocks have to resist only the difference
llH = H, - H.
The moment created by horizontal forces HA·h is then resisted by the couple !lV-L ..
ll is possible tt) develop many partially self-anchored systems in which the arch helps to reduc.e the
stress ribbon's horizontal force. Figure 12.35 desc,·ibes a static function ofone possibil ity.ln the initial
stage the arch is loaded on ly by its self-weight and the weight of the saddle segments. lo th is case, the
stress ribbon forms a one spa n structure where the bearing tendons only carry the weight of the seg-
ments at either side of the saddle.
1be horizontal force H, is tben t ransferred by means of the inclined struts into tbe stress ribbon's
anchor blocks that now have to resist only the difference
TI1e moment created by horizontal forces H,·h is then resisted by a couple of vertical forces óV:Lp.
lt is also obvious that the stress ribbon be suspended from the arch. lt is then possible to develop sev-
era! of fully or partially self-anchored systems. Figure 12.36 presents so me concepts usi ng such systems.
Figure 12.36a shows an arch fixed at the a nchor blocks of the slender prestressed concrete deck. The
arch is loaded not only by its own self weight and the stress ribbon's, but also with the rad ial forces of
the prestressing tendons.
Figure 12.36b shows a structure that has a simila r static behavior as the structure presented in
Figure I2.36d. TI1e two span stress ribbon is suspended on an arch that serves as a "saddle" o n which
the prestressed band changes c urvature. In the in itial stage the stress ribbon behaves as a two span cable
supported by the sadd le (see Figure 12.34b). The arch is loaded by its self-weight, the weightofthe saddle
segments and the radial forces caused by the bearing tendons. When the stress d bbon is post-tensioned
the stress ribbon and a rch behave as one structure.
t.V 6V Lp
1 ~J> 1 1
(a)
(b)
(e)
FIGURE 12.35 Stress ribl>on supported by arch: (a) partiallyself-anchored system, (l>) stress ril>bon, and (e) are h.
Copynghted matenal
498 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
A 8
(a)
.O. V .O. V
(b)
.O. V
.O. V il.V
(e)
.!l.H .!l.H
A 8
(d)
FIGURE 12.36 Stress ribbon suspended on arch: (a) tied arch, (b) ticd arch with side spans, (e} tied arch with
Rexural sliff side spans, and (d) two span stress ribbon suspended on are h.
To reduce the tension force at the stress ribbon anchor blocks, it is possible to connecl the stress rib-
bon and arcb footings by compression struts that fully or partially balance the stress ribbon horizontal
forces.
Figure 12.36c sbows a similar structure in wlúch the slender prestressed concrete band has increased
bending stitfness in the non-suspension portion of the structure not suspended from the areh.
Figure 12. 36d presents a structure in wlúch the change of curva tu re of the prestressed band is accom-
plished in a short saddle that is suspended from the arch. Since the arch is load ed by its self-weight and
by a point load from the stress ribbon, it shou ld have the fu nicular shape corresponding to this load.
The described structures were carefu lly analyzed and statically and dynamically tested on physical
models. The first applications presented in Section 12.6-Examples proved the economy of the solution.
12.6 Examples
12.6.1 DS-L Bridges: Bridge across the Vltava River
in Prague-Troja, Czech Republic
In the course of years 1978-1985 the author, as a chief designer of the firm Dopravni stavby Olomouc,
Czechoslovakia designed seven stress ribbon bridges of the similar arrangement (Strasky 1987b and
2011). The firm marked these structures as DS-L Bridges. The bridges have one, two, or three spans of
maxi mum length of 102m (335ft.); the maximum length of the bridge is 261.20 m (857.0 ft.). Al! these
Copynghted matenal
Stress Ribbon Pedestrian Bridges 499
1 85.50
1
96.00
1 67.50
1
(a)
(b)
bridges are asscmbled of the same precast seg ments and have si mila r structu ral a rrangement that is
d emonstrated on the exa mples ofthe bridge built in 1984 in Prague-Troja (Strasky I987a).
The bridge of the total length of 261.20 m (857.0 ft.) crosses the Vltava River in the north suburb
Prague- Troja. Jt con nects the Prague ZOO and Troja Chateau with sports facilit ies situated on the
Emperor Jsland and with the park Stromovka (see Figure 12.37).
The bridge has th ree spans oflengths o f 85.50 + 96.00 + 67.50 m (280.51 + 314.96 + Z21.46 ft.); the
sags at mid-spans are 1. 34, 1.69, and 0.84 m (4.40, 5.55. a nd 2.76 ft.). 'The stressed ribbon is formed by
precast segments and by cast·in·place saddles (pier tables) frame connected with intermed iate piers
(see Figu re 12.38). At the bottom of the piers concrete hinges, which allow rotation in the longitud inal
direction of the bridge. were designed. lhe horizontal force from the stress ribbon is resisted by wall
d iaphragms and micropiles.
The decks of all bridges are assembled of two types of segments: waffle segments that form the pre-
vailing part of the deck a nd so/id segments designed at t he abutments. The precast segments a re 3.00 m
(9.84 ft.) long, 3.80 m (12.47 ft.) wide and bave the depth 0.30 m (9.84 ft.) (see Figure 12.39). TI1e section
of the waffle segments is formed by edge girders and a deck slab. Al joint between the segments the sec·
tion is stiffened by low diaphragms.
During the ereclion the segments were suspended on bearing tendons situated al t roughs, after the
casting of the joi nts between the segments, the deck was post-tensioned by prestressing tendons situ-
ated in tbe deck slab (see Figure 12.40) . Bearin g and prest ressing tendons are formed by 6-0.6" strands.
Erection of the deck started by placing the so lid segments on the neoprene pads situated on the front
portion of the abutments. Then the first half of the bearing tendons was pulled across the river and ten-
sioned to the design stress. The tendons were supported by steel saddles situated on the piers.
Then the segments were e rected by a mobile crane. The segments were suspended on bearing tendons
and shifted along them into the design position. At first, the segments ofthe side spans were erected , and
then the segmen ts of the main span.
After aU segments were erected the second half ofthe bearing tendons was pu Ued and tensioned to the
design stress. In this way the structure reached the design shape. 1l1e.n the steel tubcs that form the ducts
in the joi nts between the segments were placed a nd prcstressing tendons were pulled through the deck.
Copynghl d mat0nal
500 Bridge Engineering Handbook, Second Edition: Superstrucwre Design
9.000
1
--
1
' 1!----ti ~,
!1
~ , . - Concrete
hinge
1 1
2.200
(a) J.00-::0+-+--4::.:.20=0---+--1'"'-1..000
6.200
(b)
(e)
FIGURE 12.38 Prague-Troja Bridgc-picr rabie: (a) clcvation, (b) eross section, and (e) plan.
Then the reinforciJ1gsteel oíthe troughs and saddles was placed a nd the joints, troughs and saddles were
cast. At first the side spans were cast, then the central span and saddles. The saddles were cast in formworks
that were suspended on the already erected segments aod were supported by the piers (see Figure. 12.19).
The static assumptions and quality of the workmanship were also checked by a static and dynamic
loading tes t see Figure 1.4. In 2001 when exceptional flood has occurred in Prague, the pedestrian bridge
was totally flooded. Careíu l exa mination of the bridge done after the tlood has confirmed that the struc-
turc was without any structural damages.
The DS-L bridges were wcll acccpted by the public and so far no problems with their static or dyna mic
performance have occurrcd. Thc dynamic tests have confirmed that is not possible to damagc the bridges
by an excessive vibration caused by people (a case of va ndalism) a nd that the speed and acceleration of
motion caused by people is within acceptable limits.
Copynghted matenal