CEP Rubrics
Targetted PLOs with Blooms: PLO-3 (C5,P3), PLO-4 (C6,P3), PLO-9 (A2), PLO-10 (A2)
The following rubric describes five levels of student performance in CEP Design. To use this 5-point scale, read the description of each level and decide which
description most accurately reflects each component you grade.
PLOs Decision Criterion Exemplary 5
Has proposed a viable,
relevant & effective design
solution that addresses all
the problem specifications
Proposed Design Solution
PLO-3 with complete
(Report)
implementation & testing
plan..
Project is implemented
according to the defined
scope mentioned in report.
Successfully developed a
Implementation of the solution that meets all and
PLO-3 Proposed Design Solution exceeds some operational
(Report) specifications. The
achievement level is
>90%.
The results are fully
interpreted and compared
with literature values. The
limitations and
Results Interpretation and
weaknesses are discussed
PLO-4 Investigation
and suggestions are made
(Report)
as to how to limit or
eliminate them.
Satisfactory 4
Has proposed a design
solution that is mostly
viable, relevant & effective
and addresses most of the
problem specifications with
almost complete
implementation & testing
plan.
Project is almost
implemented according to
the defined scope
mentioned in report.
Successfully developed a
solution that meets most of
the operational
specifications.
The achievement level is
>75%.
The results are interpreted
and compared with literature
values, but not as fully as
they might be. The
limitations and weaknesses
are reasonably discussed,
but few suggestions are
made as to how to limit or
eliminate them.
Developing 3
Has proposed a design
solution that is slightly
viable, relevant & effective
and addresses some
problem specifications with
partially complete
implementation & testing
plan.
Some of the project
sections are not properly
implemented according to
the defined scope
mentioned in report.
Developed a solution that
meets some of the
operational specifications.
The achievement level is
>50%.
The results are partially
interpreted in a logical way
or compared with literature
values. The limitations and
weaknesses are somehow
discussed and little
suggestions are made as to
how to limit or eliminate
them.
Unsatisfactory 2 Unacceptable 0-1
Has proposed a design Has not proposed a
solution that is not design solution that is
viable, relevant & viable, relevant &
effective and addresses effective and addresses
very few problem no problem
specifications with specifications with
incomplete implementation & testing
implementation & testing plan all.
plan.
Majority of the project Majority of the project
sections are not sections are not
implemented. implemented
Developed a partially that does not meet the
working solution that operational
meets very few of the specifications.
operational The achievement level is
specifications. The <25%.
achievement level is
>25%.
The results are not The results are not
interpreted in a logical interpreted or discussed
way or compared with at all.
literature values. The
limitations and
weaknesses are not
discussed, nor are
suggestions made as to
how to limit or eliminate
them.
 Student effectively
presents breadth and
depth of the topic in which
they’ve carefully selected
and pieced together a
meaningful, coherent
review of the literature with
Literature Survey proper referencing.
PLO-4 The Project report
(Report)
document contains at least
three approaches (or three
places where multiple
solutions are considered)
to solve all parts of the
term project problem.
Interacts positively with all
group members.
Encourages such
Interpersonal Skills in interaction in others.
PLO-9
Group/Individual Capacity Keeps others on task.
Excellent time
management and conflict
resolution skills.
The final report follows the
prescribed format. All the
components of the design
solution are addressed in
detail. All necessary
diagrams, equations, and
Organization/Structure graphs are correctly
PLO-10
(Report) labeled. The procedure
and results are described
clearly and in an organized
fashion.
Student moderately
presents the topic in which
they’ve compiled together a
reasonably meaningful and
coherent review of the
literature with referencing.
The Project report document
contains at least two
choices for solving most of
the parts of the term project
problem.
Interacts with all group
members spontaneously.
Conscious of time
management and has
conflict resolution skills.
The final report follows the
format. Almost all the
components of the design
solution are addressed in
detail
Almost all the necessary
diagrams, equations and
graphs are included.
The procedure and results
are mostly described clearly
and in an organized fashion.
Student vaguely presents
the topic in which they’ve
Collected little information
together through the review
of literature with ambiguous
referencing. The Project
report document contains at
least one clear choice for
solving some part of the
term project problem.
Interacts with other group
members if prompted.
Somewhat conscious of
time management and has
some conflict resolution
skills.
The final report follows the
format, but each section
may not have been
completely addressed.
Some of the necessary
diagrams, equations and
graphs are missing.
Student may have
understood the connection
between the initial problem
and the outcome of the
project, but this
understanding is not
expressed in the report.
Student poorly
demonstrates the topic in
which
Selected and combined
together a review of the
literature with poor
referencing. The Project
report document
contains only one but
unclear choice to solve
the project problem.
Rarely interacts
positively within a group
even with prompting.
Fools around.
Little emphasis on time
management and has no
conflict resolution skills.
The final report follows
the format, but there may
have been several
omissions.
Most of the necessary
diagrams, equations and
graphs are missing.
Students do not
understand the
connection between the
initial problem and the
outcome of the project.
Student performed no
literature survey at all.
The Project report
document contains no
choice to solve the
project problem.
No participation.
Sits on the sidelines with
no interaction.
Disinterested.
No stake in time
management.
The report do not
address the problem
mentioned in Project.
All the relevant
diagrams, equations and
graphs are missing.
The report has no logical
linkage, or paragraphs
are irrelevantly linked
together.
 Student has excellent Student has good Student has satisfactory Student has Student has poor
presentation skills. presentation skills. presentation skills. unsatisfactory presentation skills.
Student clearly Student understands and Student somewhat presentation skills. Student has not
Presentation Skills understands and answers answers the questions in a understands and answers Student has not answered any of the
PLO-10
(Presentation) the questions in way that reflects learning. the questions in a way that understood and questions in a way that
appropriate manner and reflects learning. answered the questions reflects learning.
detail. in a way that reflects
learning.