Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Biliqo Document (Draft)
Biliqo Document (Draft)
© Waso Boran Professional (WBP) in collaboration with the Borana Council of Elders (BCE)
February 2019
Appendices ------------------------------------------------------------------------------30
C
ommunity-based conservation has expanded rapidly across Northern Kenya, driven by
significant funding from foreign private and governmental agencies. However, a
number of challenges have arisen, which are attributed partly by the sheer size of the
geographical area under ‘community conservation’ and the application of a single conservation
model across an ethnically, geographically and ecologically varied terrain. The challenges have,
however, been downplayed and the success of the initiatives emphasized. There has been
limited effort to establish the effects of this model on the local people and their pastoral
livelihoods; the amount of land put under conservation; the impact of on-going conservation on
the movement of pastoralists and their livestock, and how conservation activities affect security
as well as local people’s access to pastures, water and other resources.
It is important to understand how communities are involved in the process of setting up and
managing community wildlife conservancies; the benefits and inherent challenges in the
conservancies, and how the grand conservancy initiative has shaped local economy, prevailing
security scenario, land rights, the culture and heritage, the integration of pastoralist
communities as well as the governance structures created to run them. It is also important to
consider that Northern Kenya is a region characterised by proliferation of small arms as
documented by a number of Small arms surveys. The region is also characterised by occasional
inter-community conflicts that are mainly driven by competition for resources and which
worsen whenever there are droughts. This is also an area that has seen unprecedented
expansion of physical infrastructure and an upsurge of conservation and tourism activities. This
has resulted in loss of pasture or wildlife habitats. In Isiolo county, the development of a resort
city and ‘growth area’ has increased land prices and escalated speculation and subdivision as
investors seek to benefit.
S
ince the early 2000s, there has been a rise in the involvement of communities, and
especially those inhabiting wildlife dispersal areas, in the national conservation program.
This was inspired by the need to preserve ecosystems and wildlife habitats that happen to
be on lands owned and held by local communities. The effort was entrenched in law following
the review and enactment of the Wildlife Conservation and Management Act in 2013.
Championing the model have been the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), a group of conservation
NGOs and personalities who say that 70% of Kenya’s wildlife is found outside national parks
and reserves and that the survival of protected areas largely depended on the preservation of
vast habitats that are on lands held by communities and private land owners.
The biggest proponent of this model is the Northern Rangelands Trust (NRT), an organisation
that was started in 2004 and is now greatly funded by a number of European countries and the
United States as well as international NGOs such as The Nature Conservancy (TNC), private
trusts and rich people in the West. As a result, the NRT has managed to set up 35 conservancies
It is out of this hue and cry that the fact-finding mission in Biliqo-Buulessa Community
Conservancy was conducted.
The exercise was carried out by a combined group of members of the Isiolo-based Waso
Professional Forum, Borana Council of Elders, the Sisi kwa Sisi organization formed by Students
from the School of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure at the Kenyatta University, journalists as
well as representatives from the Errant Native Movement. The mission was informed by the
following:
1. Claims that the community in Biliqo-Buulessa Conservancy has lost much of its grazing
areas and land rights following a move by the NRT to set up camp sites in the area. It
was important to establish whether this was the true state of affairs bearing in mind that
livestock production remains the most important livelihood activity for the community
and that any tourism activity or other economic undertaking can only supplement, but
not replace livestock husbandry;
2. That since the establishment of the Conservancy, there has been an increase in human-
wildlife conflict resulting from a large number of wildlife using grazing areas and water
resources in the conservancy as well as introduction of many non-resident lions there;
3. That there has been an escalation in cattle rustling and conflict between the Borana and
the Samburu Community leading to the killing of many people and stealing of large
numbers of livestock. There were claims that this is inspired, instigated and facilitated
by the NRT. There were also claims that the conflicts escalated with the creation of the
Conservancy and that the NRT is biased towards the needs of the Samburu community
over those of the Borana Community;
4. Claims of corruption and especially the view that NRT has compromised elected leaders
as well as the personnel in-charge of security and administration in the Marti Sub-
County and the larger Isiolo County;
5. Claims that most members of the community in Biliqo-Buulessa Conservancy had no
say in the formation of the conservancy and that they now want it disbanded.
6. There were also claims that this has greatly annoyed the NRT which has resulted to
‘punishing’ the community by unleashing the highly-trained NRT rangers as well as
morans from Samburu in order to make the community toe the line;
3.0 Findings
T
he joint team experienced first how NRT had been violating the rights of the community.
The team visited the Biliqo-Conservancy from January 26-29, 2019. Prior to the tour, the
team was informed that NRT had, on ten different occasions, used its influence within
the security and administration establishments in Isiolo County and especially in the Marti Sub-
county to frustrate the desire by the community to hold any meeting to deliberate on whether to
continue with the conservancy or not. Indeed, when the team visited, it was evident that even
conducting the fact-finding mission was risky.
The issue is complicated further by the entry of NRT which has altered the power and
traditional governance structures of the communities in the North after it appointed
conservancy managers, security scouts and members of the conservancy boards who have
effectively taken over the traditional decision-making roles of the community elders. The latter
now wield largely unchecked and ultimate power in the conservancies. NRT has also imposed
its influence on the management of resources by reducing the grazing area of the Borana
Community in the Biliqo-Conservancy and is accused of favouritism towards the Samburu and
promoting insecurity and inter-community conflicts there such that some villages were forced
to move from their former settlement to a more urban centres.
Even before the team toured Biliqo-Buulessa Conservancy, there were reports that the
conservancy security apparatus set up by the NRT responded to incidents of livestock rustling
only in cases where the victims were from the Samburu community. Members of the Borana
community say that the NRT has gone out of its way to impoverish them by totally destroying
their livelihoods. They say that the aim is to make them amenable to manipulation by the
organisation and tourism investors. According to a local elder, Mzee Mohamed Adan, the
organisation influenced the withdrawal of guns held by the Borana homeguards who earlier
defended the community. He added that since the Conservancy was formed, the community
has experienced nine raids conducted by Samburu morans, during which some sixty three
people were killed and thousands of livestock stolen. From numerous interviews with past
officials of the conservancy board and other community members, it emerged that fifty nine of
the people were killed by the Samburu after the latter were assisted by the specially-trained
NRT rangers who travelled there in NRT-branded vehicles. Four of the victims died after the
young men from the Borana community engaged in counter attacks.
Further, the team found out that well-armed Samburu herders have invaded the land belonging
to the Borana community and have been grazing their animals in an area spanning 70
kilometres from the boundary separating the two communities, thus denying the community
access to water resources and pastures there.
The Team concluded that the greatest challenge to the security in Biliqo-Buulessa conservancies,
as well as in other conservancies in the North, is that the Kenya government has largely ceded
its responsibility of providing security to the residents. There is evidently a thin line between
the roles of conservancy security vis-à-vis State security personnel because the former are well
trained and equipped with sophisticated weapons by NRT to be handling roles that are legally
the preserve of the police, the KWS and the administration. In most other countries, no NGO,
such as the NRT, is allowed to conduct operations that lead to violence and are coercive in
nature. In this regard, the government has failed the community of Biliqo-Buulessa and needs to
take its responsibilities seriously.
D
uring the discussions, former conservancy committee members, the elders, women and
the youth claimed that they were not fully aware of the implications of setting up the
conservancy.
From the interviews, it was very clear that most did not have adequate understanding of the
nature of NRT’s operations before agreeing to start the Conservancy. They claimed that before it
was started, they had sought advice from local politicians. According to Ibrahim Ali Kunno, a
former Member of the Conservancy Board, local elders had visited current Isiolo Governor,
Mohamed Kuti, to seek his advised. Kuti, who was then the local MP, advised the community
to shelve the idea of the conservancy saying that they stood to be exploited by white people.
However, the board decided to go on with the ideas after Ian Craig, the Founder of the NRT,
handpicked a few of the elders, among them Golica Jaarso Gaade, a former Councilor now an
Many members of the community admitted having participated in seminars to form the
conservancy during which the NRT made a raft of promises, most of which it has not met to
date since the Conservancy was formed in 2005. The promises made included the following:
1. That there will be peace between the Borana and Samburu communities and that
incidents of insecurity and cattle rustling would be a thing of the past;
2. The construction of a school for young people from Samburu, Borana and Rendille
communities in order to create understanding and lasting peace between the
communities;
3. That NRT would employ the youth as rangers
who would not only protect the wildlife but also
local pupulation;
4. NRT promised to invest Ksh50 million in the
conservancy and asked members of the first
Conservancy Board to identify projects of their
choice; and,
5. That each tourist visiting the conservancy would
be paying as much as Ksh1 million; Community members protest
against NRT’s Operations in
Biliqo-Buulessa Conservancy
However, the community reported that apart from
giving the conservancy a vehicle, constructing two sub-
standard classrooms and a mud-walled nursery school,
teacher’s houses, the NRT has reneged on most other promises. In any case, NRT went out of its
way to worsen the plight of the community and has assumed the decision-making powers. For
instance, the organisation refused to appoint a local person as the Conservation Manager and
decided to give the position to a member of the Samburu community who was rejected by the
community. It also engineered the sacking and replacement of members of the first board after
they demanded to know what came of the promises made to the community. Those interviewed
added that finances meant for the Conservancy were banked in an NRT account and that the
Conservancy has only held two annual general meetings since it was formed. Further, they said
that past and current conservancy board members have no powers and do not even know what
income was earned by the conservancy.
M
ost of the community members expressed suspicions that NRT has other intentions
besides its stated mission of involving the community in wildlife conservation. They
said that the NRT is more interested in securing minerals-rich sites within the
Conservancy. Matters have not being helped by the fact that the NRT has cleared, marked or
planted beacons on the sites it has identified for the construction of camp sites and/or lodges. In
addition, the community reported that NRT’s founder, Ian Craig, has been seeking information
on the sites that were allegedly identified and marked during the colonial period including
some euphorbia and Tamarindus indica (or roqqa in Oromo language) trees he says were planted
by his father in Baballa area. The sites identified by Craig and the NRT happen to be the same
ones where tourist facilities are set to be put up. But the community has opposed moves to put
up the tourist facilities there saying that the NRT made the decision without involving them.
There are also claims that the British colonial administration had done exploratory studies in
the entire area and had identified and marked over sixty sites there which are said to have
massive mineral wealth. Further, members of the community told the team that NRT has gone
out of its way to secure these areas pending exploitation by foreign companies. This seems to be
confirmed by documents that site Isiolo as one of the counties hosting immense mineral wealth
in Kenya.
A community member displays a placard with accusations against the NRT
I
n Kenya, communities are defined as consciously distinct and organized groups of land
users who are citizens of Kenya and share common ancestry, similar culture, language
and/or unique mode of livelihood. The administration and management of community
lands is provided for by the Community Land Act. The Act gives pastoral communities a legal
Although this piece of legislation came into effect in 2016 and was meant to give effect to the
provisions of the Constitution on community land, the process of developing Regulations for its
implementation have taken a long time. At the same time, members of the pastoral communities
are not aware neither are they informed on the provisions of the Act. Further, the National
Land Commission and the Isiolo County Government are yet to initiate a process that would
lead to registration of community land and implementation of this law. This has given
organisations such as the NRT room to manipulate communities for their own ends.
From the interviews, it became clear that NRT has capitalised on the lack of awareness of the
land rights of the inhabitants of the Conservancy to violate their land rights. However, the
community protested after the NRT identified and embarked on constructing five tourist camps
in resource-rich areas of the Charri Rangeland. This included the following:
1. Baballa Camp that is set to be put up along an animal movement route close to the
Ewaso Nyiro River;
2. Maddo Gurba Huqqa which is close to a community shallow well;
3. Sabarwawa, an area where the water table is quite shallow;
4. Nyaacisa which was used by the community for traditional naming ceremonies; and,
5. Kuro-Bisaan Owwo which is close to a hot spring, beneficial to livestock health.
What angered the community is that all of the camps are either set up in (or are intended to be
set up) on sites that are key for the survival of the community and their livestock-based
economy. Indeed, these are areas that have water resources that the community relies on for
domestic water needs and for watering thousands of livestock. The community’s protest was
sparked off following a meeting during which Craig asked the Conservancy Board to fence off
Kuro Springs which would have denied livestock from accessing it. Although Craig had
advised the board to pipe the water to a place where livestock would access it, this led to fears
Magaado crater in Kulamawe Location.
As we drove deeper into Isiolo County we did not see a single wild animal. This was unsettling
for 30 years ago the land teemed with wild life – the hirola, the grevy zebra, wild “painted”
dogs, lions, gazelles, oryx, reticulated giraffe, the rare-black reticulated giraffe, the buffalo,
wildebeest and elephant, the leopard and lion, warthogs, porcupines, anteaters, pangolins, tree
hyrax, baboons, mongoose, squirrels, monkeys and giant monitor lizards, to name but a few.
We crossed a river bed with beautiful soft white sand, the bed dry and with deep elephant
footprints. The guide said informed us that “…this is the elephant route that they use to go to
the hot springs – they go there to drink every evening – see the dung – they’ve just passed here.
A story - we Borana take our cattle to drink during the day but not in the evening after 4 pm.
You see, we have a tradition which is very old – we water our animals in the morning by
putting water for them in the troughs, and because our animals are many, and the wells are
deep, we work until late mid morning. By that time, the animals have all drank the water and
are full, stomachs bulging. It is time to leave, but before we leave we must fill the troughs to the
maximum for the wild animals to drink. This is a custom, and if a young man does not do this
he is whipped or disciplined by the elders, for we must give water to the animals, and it is our
The oasis water is a natural spring, some of it is hot and some is cool, and the community use
the water at the hot springs to do their laundry – laughing out loud and exclaiming – “.. when
you wash your clothes there – even the dirtiest ones in the hot springs, they come out very very
clean!” The community also use the springs to treat their hurting bodies by bathing with the
water which they believe they were given by Allah (God) for their medicinal properties.
Picture: Batian Craig, son of Ian Craig and Security Chief of the Ol Pajeta Ranch kidnaps a
Hirola, ostensibly to ‘treat it’ . However, once captured by NRT, elders have complained for
over 10 years that the animals are never returned - neither to the Borana peoples nor back into
the wild. This is not
unusual for the Craig
family – it is an ongoing
behavioural pattern.
“… we had a pack of wild
dogs that lived up on the
hill, over there, in the caves,
and they gave birth, and
they became about 14 of
them. Then one day Ian
Craig landed on that hill
with his helicopter, and he
took the wild dogs – all of
them!...” moaned an Elder.
The northern Great Plains ecosystem of North America was once inhabited by free ranging
herds of bison ranging in the millions. In the 1800s, human settlement in the area led to large
scale slaughter of bison and conversion of much of the grass prairie to agriculture. Only
relatively recently have restoration and conservation efforts led to protected tracts of mixed-
Finally, bison grazing increases animal diversity on the landscape. Bison grazed areas increase
the foraging efficiency of prairie dogs which in turn are the main food source of ferrets (Krueger
1986). Prairie dogs also provide food for foxes, hawks and eagles and their colonies are home to
other small mammals and reptiles.
While driving through and looking at the thousands of square kilometeres in Isiolo that had
absolutely no wild life, it is important to note and understand the impact of the vile
carelessness, or the unwillingness to learn - of both our national government, and the greed of
the Northern Rangelands Trust in disregarding the cultures of the indigenous people, their
sciences and the impact and value of the original human/animal/bird ecology.
5.1 In Reinterpreting the 1882 Bison Population Collapse there are pointers that perhaps
the Kenyan Wildlife Society, Kenyan Ecologists, Scientists, Errant Natives, Conservationists,
Communities, , Politicians and Kenyans as a whole must analyse deeply if they truly want to
help “conserve” not only Northern Kenya, but all Savannah land in Kenya.
One pointer is that the indigenous Pastoralists hold the keys to conservation, and not the other
way around. Serious conservation needs to listen to and adapt the conservation methods used
over thousands of years by those who have lived on these plains.
But the main pointer is to understand that the NRT’s model has demolished the ecosystem by
moving wild life and cattle forcefully from one area to another, from stealing cattle from the
locals, by separating wild life from their guides – the local communities, and by blocking
migratory routes.
Range management suffers a Dr Jekyll/Mr Hyde dichotomy. On one hand, society is deeply
invested in the idea that range management is positive. How many government agencies have
how many people spending how much money year after year instituting and disseminating
range management practices? How many universities have how many instructors with how
many research projects and how many tax shillings teaching range management to class after
class and developing newer and better ways to manage range? Everything from soil erosion to
noxious weeds to sage-grouse welfare is believed to hinge on range management.
And at the same time, society is just as strongly invested in the opposite viewpoint, that the
finest management is that of Mother Nature, unsullied by quote “human involvement”
unquote. From this perspective, every single one of those hours and dollars and educations and
careers is a waste of time and resources and directly harmful to the environment. This
perspective is represented by the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge, which changed
In “Gardeners of Eden, Rediscovering Our Importance to Nature”, Dan Dagget labeled this
perspective the “Leave-It-Alone” assumption. He characterized it by a comment he heard an
Earth First!er made to a rancher - “There’s only one thing you can do to make this place better.
You can LEAVE. Because if you stay, no matter what you do to the land, no matter how good
you make it look, it will be unnatural and therefore bad. And if you leave, whatever happens to
this place, even if it becomes as bare as a parking lot, it will be natural and therefore good”
(p.18).
Later, Dagget states, “The Great Plains of North America with their huge herds of bison are
offered as proof of the effectiveness of the Leave-It-Alone approach. As the story goes, the wild
and free bison were hunted by Indians who were too few to keep the Great Plains from
becoming one of the most biologically productive habitats the earth has ever produced and one
of the greatest successes of the Leave-It-Alone approach” (p. 22).
Dagget’s thesis that Leave-It-Alone’s opinion of Original Americans is, “when it comes to how
they managed the environment, the thing most of us value about those indigenous peoples is
the perception that there were so few of them they couldn’t really mess things up. In other
words, we value them for being a failure, because that’s what most of us ASSUMED they were”
(p. 135) It may seem unnecessarily harsh. However, in his encyclopedic, 602-page indictment of
management, Waste of the West: Public Lands Ranching, Lynn Jacobs (p. 9) states, “Although
the indigenous Native Americans exerted many influences on their environment, as a whole
they had an incomparably less destructive impact than those who would follow. Perhaps this
was largely because they had lesser means to exploit and destroy.”
The Pikuni of the Nitsitapii or Blackfoot Confederation had ranged the part of the Great Plains
since at least the 14th century. Nomadic bands had inhabited the Plains and hunted bison since
the terminal Pleistocene (14,000 years ago), using the impoundment method for at least 2,000
years. In Allan Savory’s Holistic Management: A New Framework for Decision Making, there
was a documented experiment. When Robert Paine removed the main predator, a certain
species of starfish, from a population of fifteen observable species, things quickly changed.
Within a year, the area was occupied by only eight (8)of the original fifteen species (15).
Numbers within the prey species boomed and species that could move left the area; those that
could not move, simply died out. Paine speculated that in time even more species would be lost.
Like Paine, Holt says, “.. we, in effect, removed the starfish. But in our case we put a different
type of starfish back in. We replaced drum beating, gun firing, spear-throwing, gardening and
farming people with foreign ecologists, foreign naturalists, and foreign tourists under strict
control to ensure they did not disturb the animals or vegetation.” Just as in Paine’s study, the
results were quick and dramatic. Within a few decades - miles of riverbank in both valleys
were devoid of reeds, fig thickets, and most other vegetation. With nothing but the change in
behavior of one species – the human communities - these areas became terribly impoverished
and are still deteriorating seriously. (p. 20–21)
Fur trader Charles Larpenteur witnessed such hunts and reported up to 300 bison could be
harvested. Imagine 80 to 160 people, about half of them vigorous adults, harvesting and
processing up to 300 buffalo at a time, 1,000 or more a year. That’s a lot of meat, but “from
Hopewell times (beginning of the first millennium AD), surpluses (probably pemmican) were
produced and traded downriver into the Midwest region, and overland to the Southwest” (p.
37), since “meat represents plant carbohydrates processed into a highly cost-efficient form in
terms of transportation costs” (pp. 96-98). This means that upto 1000 bison would be harvested
annually, for the entire country.
Were the Nitsitapii managers? There seems to be no question in the mind of anthropologist
Alice Kehoe. She referred to life on the Great Plains as a “human’s planned economy” and
called it, “a livestock production strategy minimizing labor input - great skill in managing herds
was developed” (p. 88).
Let us step back from the trees and take a wider look at the history of the plains Maasai, the
Somali, the Borana and all the Pastoralists in Kenya, of their ways of life, their management
system of the wildlife, of their herds and the Pastoralist Nomadic culture.
A management system is a set of policies, processes and procedures used by a group of people
to ensure that the group can fulfill the responsibilities required to achieve its goals, objectives or
purposes. These goals are what cover many aspects of a cultures processes and actions. Why is
it so difficult to believe that for over 20,000 years Pastoralists in the arid and semi-arid lands
had developed the ultimate production system, and that the interference of the fumbling
colonialization, the arrogant movement of peoples and their borders, and the disregarding of
the local community and authorities is what has caused the collapse of the African Savannah
and Rangelands eco-system?
Among the latter ‘food plagues’ recorded and given significance in the management of the
Kenyan rangelands is a remarkably little-known viral disease of cattle and other ungulates that
‘has been blamed for speeding the subjugating East Africa to colonization (Rinderpest, scourge of
There was a loss of management in both Africa, and in the America’s where the bison went
nearly extinct. We can all agree upon that. They seem to have been nearly wiped out by
overgrazing and by diseases at least some of which were native to the continent. And this was
after roughly 14,000 years sharing North America with people and not going extinct. Something
important apparently changed. The near-extinction seems to have occurred following the
arrival of Europeans in both cases, so it is easy to suspect they were somehow involved. That is
why the simple explanation, “Europeans just shot them all,” has always been so popular. If the
diseases had been European diseases, that would also have been a simple obvious narrative.
European arrival did have tremendous impact on human and animal movements, so it is
possible to attribute the epidemics to that—changes in movement made disease transmission
possible in ways it never had been before.
That is one explanation, but not the most plausible one. Looking at Savory’s description, with
photographs, of the damage to the Zambezi River and its elephant population caused by
removing humans, and seeing that Lewis & Clark described similar riverbank effects following
the same length of time after smallpox had removed Pikuni from the Upper Missouri suggests
the idea that the European diseases that were the most deadly (ultimately) to the bison were
those that killed the humans. Humans had been providing a “something” that the bison were
unable to survive without. What was it?
In the starfish example, the missing “something” was predation. The starfish were not
managers. And the idea that removing a key predator can destabilize and damage an ecosystem
is fairly universally accepted. But in the elephant example, the most important thing the
humans were supplying was not predation. They kept the river and elephants healthy by
impacting the behaviour of the elephants. Indeed, once the elephant behaviour had changed
and the ecosystem had begun to deteriorate, Savory notes that the “new managers” tried to
replace the old management they had removed with predation, to no avail! No matter how
many elephants were killed, the ecosystem remained degraded.
Yet still more plausible is the answer that the lost “something” was more than just predation. It
was management. Whether or not we consider Original Americans or Africans capable of
management depends in part on the European definition of management.
If Europeans define it as using modern technology and “Western scientific method”, it is clearly
a recent innovation. However, environmental management requires intelligent intent,
observation, foresight, goals, the ability to remember and learn from the past, the ability to
predict the future, and the ability to communicate with others. That is something the original
Africans and American peoples did. As with the elephants in Africa, it seems that replacing
centuries-old management with mere predation was doomed to failure.
According to Gary Nabhan the sequence that Holt proposed for the Pikuni (intensive
management, abandonment of managed lands following severe epidemic, “discovery” of those
lands as “virgin wilderness” by subsequent Europeans) happened all across North America and
in Africa.
In Cultural Parallax in Viewing North American Habitats, he refers to habitats of pre-
Columbian North America as both “intensively managed” (p. 92) and “actively managed” (p.
93). Holt became certain that her interpretation was influenced by her experiences on a family
ranch in the Great Plains. Her great-grandparents were supplying their cattle herd with
predation 100 years ago, but the current management methods have grown and adapted over
time, thanks to the management criteria listed previously. Watching how sensitive and
responsive the landscape was to the management methods and imagining what would happen
if they were replaced with mere predation, convinced Holt that the skills and understandings
her family has developed over 100 years were most certainly possessed by people that had
10,000 years to study this ecosystem.
And there is nothing more devastating to a management system with no written records, where
a system was based solely on trained individuals and oral transmission and memory, than a
major outbreak of fatal disease, the methodical killing of a race, or the movement of indigenous
peoples by force.
A month of journal entries by Lewis & Clark over 31 days, found 28 mentions of unhealthy
vegetation (compared with today), 14 mentions of extremely large herds of game animals, 13
mentions of unseasonably dry stream beds (compared with today), 5 mentions of collapsing
river banks, 4 mentions of high levels of water erosion, 4 mentions of extreme wind erosion
(compared with today), and 2 mentions of oddly gentle buffalo (p. 117–259; see Appendix 1).
Aside from the extrajudicial killings that have been reported - crimes committed by NRT
rangers and thus breaking all the policies regarding human rights – NRT also positions
electrified and barbed wires fences across migratory routes and proclaims ‘no go zones’ not
only on Borana owned land, but on land across the Northern Counties.