Research Gap

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Problem solving Strategy Object Focus Method

Cost Regulation
No Author /Year Topic Feasibility Financial Economica Investment
benafit Other Profit evaluation/ Other
Study Analysis l Analysis cost/retrofit
Analysis Efficiency
(Li & Cullinane, Maritime Risk Literature review
1 Management √ √ √
2003)
Competitive √ Qualitative
2 (Panayides, 2003) √
strategies
(Dikos et al., Invesment √ System-dynamics
3 decision, Tanker √ models
2006) freight
(Gollasch & Ballast water Risk Assessment
4 Leppäkoski, manajemen √ √
2007)
(Mamlook et al., Choosing ballast √ Determisitik
5 water √ Fuzzy
2008) instrument
(Knapp & Impact Ordinary least
6 international √ squares (OLS)
Franses, 2009) regulation method
analysis of the √ System Dynamics
interactions
7 (Mingming, 2011) √
between port
and economy
(Bachér & Maritime -
8 environmental √ √ √
Albrecht, 2013) regulations
(Nghiem et al., Ballast water Monte Carlo
9 manajemen √ √ √ simulation model
2013)
International TAPAS
(Holmgren et al., regulation low-
10 √ √
2014) sulphur marine
fuels
Ballast water Fuzzy-analytic
treatment hierarchy process
11 (Satir, 2014) √ √
systems

12 (Baldi & Feasibility √ √ √ Payback time and


analysis of capital investment
Gabrielii, 2015)
waste heat
recovery
Problem solving Strategy Object Focus Method
Cost Regulation
No Author /Year Topic Feasibility Financial Economica Investment
benafit Other Profit evaluation/ Other
Study Analysis l Analysis cost/retrofit
Analysis Efficiency
systems
Impact System of
(Karahalios et al., international Hierarchical
13 √ √ √
2011, 2012,2015) regulation Scorecards (SHS),
AHP and Fuzzy
Impediment of √ Literature review
(Zhang & Zhao, implementation
14 √
2015) regulation at
cina
feasibility √ Sytem dynamic
15 (Jo et al., 2015) analysis using √ √ model
sytem dynamic
(Rivas-Hermann Onshore ballast Model multi-level
16 water treatment √ √ √ Qualitative
et al., 2015) approch
(Geng et al., √ System Dynamics
17 √
2017)
(Zaman et al., Financial Monte Carlo
18 Feasibility of √ √ √ Simulation
2017) Tanker Project
(Marlyana, competitiveness √ Qualitative
19 N;Tontowi, A √ analysis based on
literature review
E;Yuniarto, 2017)
Impact System Dynamic
(Setyohadi et al., international monte carlo
20 √ √ √
2018) regulation, Oil
Tanker
(Tjahjono & Onshore ballast √ SWOT Analysis
21 water treatment √ √
Handoko, 2018)
Strategy to Qualitative
(Gerhard et al., choosing ballast analysis
22 √ √ √
2019) water
instrument
23 (Amalia et al., Ship Conversion √ √ √ Feasibility
analysis Analysis
2019)
Economic NPV, IRR,PP
Feasibility
Problem solving Strategy Object Focus Method
Cost Regulation
No Author /Year Topic Feasibility Financial Economica Investment
benafit Other Profit evaluation/ Other
Study Analysis l Analysis cost/retrofit
Analysis Efficiency
Parameter
Retrofit ship for Multi-objective
implementing genetic algorithm
24 (Yu et al., 2019) shore side √ √ (NSGA-II) tosum
electricity of the payback
periods
(Prastyasari et al., Feasibility study System dynamic
25 of diesel engine √ √ √ √
2019) replacement
(Stavroulakis et competitiveness √ surveys, expert
26 √ interviews
al., 2019)
(Wang & Corbett, Onboat ballast Cost effective
27 water treatment √ √ √ analysis
2020) using tongkang
CO2 emissions; NPV of ROA
(Olaniyi & waste heat
28 √ √ √
Prause, 2020) recovery
systems;
Optimization √ Fuzzy logic
29 (Jorge, 2020) strategy for the √ √
BWMS
Management System dynamic,
(Hardiyanto, Strategi AHP
30 √ √ √ √ √ √ √
2021) implementasi
regulation
Daftar Pustaka

Amalia, N. S., Gurning, R. O. S., & Nugroho, T. F. (2019). Economic Analysis Of KM Mina
Jaya Niaga Longliner Ship Conversion To Fish Carrier Ship. International Journal of
Marine Engineering Innovation and Research, 4(1).
https://doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v4i1.2584

Arif, M. S., Kurniawati, H. A., & Misbah, M. N. (2016). Analisa Teknis Dan Ekonomis
Pemilihan Manajemen Air Ballas Pada Kapal (Ship Ballast Water Management) Di
Indonesia. Kapal, 13(3), 126. https://doi.org/10.14710/kpl.v13i3.12351

Aziz, A., & Rahman, A. A. (2014). The Impact of Balanced Scorecard to Strengthen the
Competitiveness of Industrial Companies. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting,
5(15), 58–73.

Bachér, H., & Albrecht, P. (2013). Evaluating the costs arising from new maritime
environmental regulations.
http://www.trafi.fi/filebank/a/1392997036/640155e8ece18c8cca5abcc18d8c9c31/14262-
Trafi_Publications_24-2013_-
_Evaluating_the_costs_arising_from_new_maritime_environmental_regulations.pdf

Baldi, F., & Gabrielii, C. (2015). A feasibility analysis of waste heat recovery systems for marine
applications. Energy, 80, 654–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.020

Dikos, G., Marcus, H. S., Papadatos, M. P., & Papakonstantinou, V. (2006). Niver lines: A
system-dynamics approach to tanker freight modeling. Interfaces, 36(4), 326–341.
https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1060.0218

Engelen, S., Meersman, H., & Van De Voorde, E. (2006). Using system dynamics in maritime
economics: An endogenous decision model for shipowners in the dry bulk sector. Maritime
Policy and Management, 33(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830600612807

Geng, X., Wen, Y., Zhou, C., & Xiao, C. (2017). Establishment of the sustainable ecosystem for
the regional shipping industry based on system dynamics. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(5).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050742

Gerhard, W. A., Lundgreen, K., Drillet, G., Baumler, R., Holbech, H., & Gunsch, C. K. (2019).
Installation and use of ballast water treatment systems – Implications for compliance and
enforcement. Ocean & Coastal Management, 181(July), 104907.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104907

Gollasch, S., & Leppäkoski, E. (2007). Risk assessment and management scenarios for ballast
water mediated species introductions into the Baltic Sea. Aquatic Invasions, 2(4), 313–340.
https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2007.2.4.3

Holmgren, J., Nikopoulou, Z., Ramstedt, L., & Woxenius, J. (2014). Modelling modal choice
effects of regulation on low-sulphur marine fuels in Northern Europe. Transportation
Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28(2014), 62–73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.009
Jo, H., Lee, H., Suh, Y., Kim, J., & Park, Y. (2015). A dynamic feasibility analysis of public
investment projects: An integrated approach using system dynamics and agent-based
modeling. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), 1863–1876.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.07.002

Jorge, S. (2020). Framework and implementation of a fuzzy logic filter — an optimization


strategy for the BWMS based on stakeholders ’ perspectives. 37790–37801.

Karahalios, H., Yang, Z. L., Williams, V., & Wang, J. (2011). A proposed System of
Hierarchical Scorecards to assess the implementation of maritime regulations. Safety
Science, 49(3), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.11.001

Knapp, S., & Franses, P. H. (2009). Does ratification matter and do major conventions improve
safety and decrease pollution in shipping? Marine Policy, 33(5), 826–846.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.03.005

Krivchenkov, A., Grakovski, A., & Balmages, I. (2020). Feasibility Study on the Use of Energy
Storage Systems to Reduce the Enterprise Energy Consumption Costs. International
Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, 117, 500–
510. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44610-9_49

Li, K. X., & Cullinane, K. (2003). An Economic Approach to Maritime Risk Management and
Safety Regulation. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5(3), 268–284.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100078

Mamlook, R., Badran, O., Abu-Khader, M. M., Holdo, A., & Dales, J. (2008). Fuzzy sets
analysis for ballast water treatment systems: Best available control technology. Clean
Technologies and Environmental Policy, 10(4), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-
007-0130-7

Marlyana, N;Tontowi, A E;Yuniarto, H. A. (2017). Characteristic and factors of competitive


maritime industry clusters in Indonesia. Materials Science and Engineering, 277.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/277/1/012001

Mingming, F. (2011). PORT AND ECONOMY RELATIONSHIP ANALYSIS BY SYSTEM.


American Society of Civil Engineers, 162–167.

Nghiem, L. T. P., Soliman, T., Yeo, D. C. J., Tan, H. T. W., Evans, T. A., Mumford, J. D.,
Keller, R. P., Baker, R. H. A., Corlett, R. T., & Carrasco, L. R. (2013). Economic and
Environmental Impacts of Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in Southeast Asia. PLoS ONE,
8(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071255

Olaniyi, E. O., & Prause, G. (2020). Investment analysis of waste heat recovery system
installations on ships’ engines. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(10), 1–21.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100811

Panayides, P. M. (2003). Competitive strategies and organizational performance in ship


management. Maritime Policy and Management, 30(2), 123–140.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0308883032000084850

Prastyasari, F. I., Handani, D. W., Dinariyana, a. a. B., & Prakoso, M. a. (2019). Feasibility study
of diesel engine replacement on passenger ships: a system dynamics approach. WMU
Journal of Maritime Affairs, 18(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00169-9
Rivas-Hermann, R., Köhler, J., & Scheepens, A. E. (2015). Innovation in product and services in
the shipping retrofit industry: A case study of ballast water treatment systems. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 106(April), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.062

Satir, T. (2014). Ballast water treatment systems: design, regulations, and selection under the
choice varying priorities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(18), 10686–
10695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3087-1

Setyohadi, P., Artana, K. B., Manfaat, D., & Gurning, R. O. S. (2018). Dynamic response of risk
management model to mitigate impact of maritime regulatory changes: Oil tanker owners
perspective. Operations and Supply Chain Management, 11(3), 118–127.
https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0320208

Shaffie, S. S., & Jaaman, S. H. (2016). Monte Carlo on Net Present Value for Capital Investment
in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 688–693.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.052

Stavroulakis, P. J., Papadimitriou, S., Tsioumas, V., Koliousis, I. G., Riza, E., & Olga, E. (2019).
Strategic competitiveness in maritime clusters. Case Studies on Transport Policy,
September 2018, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.10.008

Tjahjono, A., & Handoko, W. (2018). The implementation of ballast water management in Port
of Tanjung Emas semarang: Strategy and model. AACL Bioflux, 11(4), 1231–1247.

Wang, Z., & Corbett, J. J. (2020). Scenario-based cost-effectiveness analysis of ballast water
treatment strategies. 11.

Yu, J., Voß, S., & Tang, G. (2019). Strategy development for retrofitting ships for implementing
shore side electricity. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,
74(2019), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.004

Zaman, M. B., Priyanta, D., & Trisilo, F. (2017). Risk Assessment in Financial Feasibility of
Tanker Project Using Monte Carlo Simulation. International Journal of Marine
Engineering Innovation and Research, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v1i4.2703

Zhang, P., & Zhao, M. (2015). Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 and the Chinese seafarers:
How far is China to ratification? Marine Policy, 61, 54–65.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.07.016

You might also like