Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6 Chris-Emenyonu and Onweremadu 2011
6 Chris-Emenyonu and Onweremadu 2011
7(4):38-45
Published December, 2011 Chris-Emenyonu, and Onweremadu, 2011
Soil erosion is a major environmental problem in Southeastern Nigeria. The study was conducted on three land use types namely
fallow land (Control), oil palm plantation and cassava farm to investigate erodibility of soils. Two indirect measures were used
namely, clay dispersion index and clay dispersion ratio. These land use types served as treatments and 5 samples were collected
from soils under each land use in the depths of 0-15cm. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design. The
samples were analyzed in the laboratory. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to estimate variability among land use. Simple
correlation analysis was conducted to establish relationship among soil properties. Means were separated using least significant
difference (LSD) at 5% level of probability. Sand fraction dominated with mean percentage values of 84.44, 87.40, and 85.30 in
the fallow land, oil palm plantation and cassava land, respectively. The clay dispersion index and clay dispersion ratio used as an
index of erosion were high. The clay dispersion index is a better index of erodibility because when it was correlated with different
parameters such as ECEC and organic matter the values obtained were higher than that of clay dispersion ratio. Clay dispersion
index correlated positively with organic matter with values of r = 0.990 in the fallow land, the oil palm plantation and cassava
dominated land use values were r = 0.99, and r = 097 respectively. pH in water and KCl were higher in the cassava dominated
land use with a mean value of 4.90 in water and 4.30 in KCl. Total porosity was higher in soils under oil palm plantation with
mean percentage values of 65. There was a non-significant (p<0.05) difference in soil OC, TN., AP, TP, ECEC, %BS, Sand, Soil
moisture, Bulk density in all land use .The area inherent erodibility was considered as high thus pointing to the need for careful
use and management of the soil resource. Availability of various soil nutrients varied in the three land use types. The Oil palm
plantation had the highest SOM, AP, TEB, Mg, ECEC, % B.S and lowest Al content.
Keywords: Degradation, Clay dispersion index, Clay dispersion ratio, land use types.
INTRODUCTION
Soils serve agronomic, environmental, engineering and recreational functions (Zinck, 1990). However, soils are
subject to deterioration, which is aggravated by increasing farming population who cultivate fragile slope soils
(Onweremadu, 2006). Decline in the quality of such soil because of erosion is one of the ecological problems that is
ravaging the Nigerian landscape, especially Southeastern Nigeria. Water erosion is unarguably the most active in the
ultisols of southern Nigeria (Mbagwu, 1992). Igwe et al. (2002) related erodibility of soils in southeastern Nigeria to
soil moisture retention characteristics and texture. Osuji and Onweremadu (2007) reported variability in structural
stability due to land use, and this had significant relationship with organic matter and erodibilty. Erodibility has been
measured using direct and indirect indices such as water dispersed clay (WDC), clay flocculation index (CFI),
aggregated silt and clay (ASC), clay dispersion index (CDI) and clay dispersion ratio (CDR). The fraction of clay that
disperses in water which is known as water-dispersible clay (WDC) has been shown by Kjaergaard et al. (2004) as an
important property with respect to predicting soil erosion and colloid Leaching. The clay-dispersion ratio (CDR)
derived from the clay contents, water dispersed clay (WDC) and the clay dispersion index (CDI) have been
successfully used to predict erosion by water. Igwe (2005) remarked that the clay-dispersion ratio and dispersion
index were found to be good indices for predicting erodibility in some soils of southeastern Nigeria.
The vulnerability of soils to erosive forces is affected by land use. This is because soil properties vary according to
the use to which they are put. Onweremadu, (2005) reported variability in porosity of soil as well as changes in
organic matter (Mbah et al., 2007) due to land use. Imo State has densely populated urban and rural communities and
soils are used for agricultural and non-agricultural uses. These land use activities increase pressure on the soil
resource, resulting to various forms of soil. erosion. In the state, about 261 gullies have been documented
(Onyewuchi, 1996) indicating that the state is severely threatened by gully erosion .These threatens livelihood and
comfort. The objective of this study was to investigate the factors affecting the efficiency of some indices to predict
erodibility of soils under different land use types in Imo, southeastern Nigeria.
Sample in Sand Clay Silt (CDR) CDI Silt/ Clay Sample Sand Silt Clay Silt/Clay Silt + BD MC TP
Water gkg-1 (%) .(%) Ratio in Calgon gkg-1 ratio Clay (g/cm3 (%) (%)
A1 822.4 68.0 109.8 95.50 4.60 1.6:1 A1 814.0 74.6 111.4 1.49 18.60 1.16 33.30 56.00
A2 862.4 57.6 80.0 72.80 6.31 1.4:1 A2 811.0 70.0 119.0 1.70 18.90 1.03 37.50 61.00
A3 842.4 67.8 90.0 87.60 5.30 1.3:1 A3 800.0 80.0 120.0 2.00 18.00 0.83 39.90 69.00
A4 832.4 59.6 108.0 93.00 4.90 2:1 A4 820.0 65.6 114.4 1.74 18.00 1.08 37.60 69.00
A5 862.4 17.6 120.0 76.00 6.30 7:1 A5 820.0 40.0 140.0 3.50 18.00 0.78 40.70 71.00
Means 844.4 54.1 101.5 84.98 4.42 2.59 Mean 820.2 66.0 121.0 2.08 18.30 0.98 37.80 63.20
B1 882.4 28.0 89.6 90.50 7.50 3.2:1 B1 870.0 35.4 94.6 2.67 13.00 0.94 39.90 68.00
B2 882.4 27.6 90.0 83.00 7.50 3.3:1 B2 858.4 31.6 110.0 3.48 14.16 0.86 26.20 64.00
B3 882.4 28.0 89.6 84.00 7.50 3.3:1 B3 860.0 40.0 100.0 2.50 14.00 0.95 31.90 74.00
B4 862.4 37.6 100.0 86.00 6.30 3.0:1 B4 840.0 50.0 110.0 2.20 16.00 0.68 38.80 60.00
B5 862.4 37.6 100.0 86.00 6.30 3.0:1 B5 840.0 50.0 110.0 2.20 16.00 1.06 36.30 62.00
Mean 874.0 31.8 93.8 85.90 7.02 3.00 Mean 854.0 41.4 104.9 2.61 14.63 0.90 34.62 65.60
C1 862.4 57.6 80.0 86.50 6.30 1.4:1 C1 841.0 64.6 94.4 1.46 15.90 1.01 37.80 62.00
C2 820.0 74.0 106.0 94.70 4.50 1.4:1 C2 810.0 76.0 114.0 1.50 19.00 1.08 31.40 59.00
C3 897.6 17.0 85.0 63.80 8.80 4.9:1 C3 840.0 50.0 110.0 2.20 16.00 1.04 35.70 61.00
C4 822.4 84.6 93.0 93.50 4.60 1.1:1 C4 810.0 90.0 100.0 1.10 19.00 1.03 31.40 61.00
C5 862.4 37.6 100.0 80.90 6.30 2.7:1 C5 830.0 50.0 120.0 2.40 17.00 1.30 25.50 51.00
Mean 853.0 54.2 92.8 83.90 6.10 2.30 Mean 824.2 56.9 108.9 1.73 17.38 1.09 32.36 58.80
LSD0.05 3.07 2.77 1.60 13.03 1.61 0.88 1.75 1.96 1.35 0.88 1.65 0.19 6.28 7.64
Sample pH pH ∂pH O.M T.N BS Ca/Mg C/N Av.P Ca Mg K Na ECEC TEA A1st TEB BS Ca/Mg
No. (H20) (KCl) (%) (%) (%) ratio ratio Mg/kg cmol/kg (%)
A1 4.71 4.12 0.59 2.24 0.05 53.12 0.11:1 25:1 2.96 0.10 0.91 0.01 0.01 1.92 0.90 0.42 1.02 53.12 0.11:1
A2 5.13 4.29 0.84 2.60 0.06 94.40 0.48:1 25:1 3.20 1.45 3.00 0.01 0.02 4.60 0.12 Trace 4.48 94.40 0.48:1
A3 4.69 4.11 0.58 2.60 0.06 34.00 0.63:1 26:1 2.80 0.05 0.08 0.01 0.02 0.47 0.13 0.20 0.16 34.00 0.63:1
A4 4.85 4.13 0.72 3.10 0.06 86.90 0.76:1 29:1 4.20 1.15 0.17 0.01 0.01 1.53 0.20 0.43 1.33 86.90 0.76:1
A5 5.03 4.14 0.89 3.30 0.70 88.70 0.79:1 27:1 3.90 0.85 1.08 0.01 0.02 2.21 0.25 0.40 1.96 88.70 0.79:1
Mean 4.88 4.16 0.72 2.77 0.174 72.02 0.55 26:1 3.41 0.72 0.72 0.01 0.02 2.15 0.36 0.29 1.79 72.02 0.55
B1 4.86 4.20 0.66 3.60 0.07 96.50 4.0:1 31:1 3.80 2.85 0.67 0.01 0.01 3.67 0.13 Trace 3.54 96.50 4.0:1
B2 5.02 4.65 0.37 3.60 0.07 97.80 1.04:1 28:1 5.20 4.75 4.58 0.02 0.02 9.59 0.21 Trace 9.38 97.80 1.04:1
B3 4.51 3.98 0.53 3.30 0.06 90.00 1.07:1 32:1 5.20 1.60 1.50 0.01 0.06 3.51 0.35 0.14 3.16 90.00 1.07:1
B4 4.51 3.98 0.63 3.60 0.07 93.60 0.44:1 30:1 2.90 1.06 2.40 0.02 0.03 3.75 0.24 0.35 3.51 93.60 0.44:1
B5 4.61 4.03 0.58 3.10 0.05 99.20 0.08:1 33:1 3.00 1.30 16.6 0.03 0.33 18.41 0.15 Trace 18.26 99.20 0.08:1
Means 4.61 4.17 0.55 3.44 0.064 95.42 1.34 31:1 3.60 2.31 5.15 0.02 0.09 7.79 0.22 0.09 7.57 95.42 1.34
C1 5.76 5.05 0.71 3.00 0.05 97.30 4.0:1 62:1 3.00 7.35 0.67 0.01 0.03 8.28 0.22 Trace 8.06 97.30 4.0:1
C2 4.60 4.11 0.49 2.24 0.04 92.74 5.29:1 62:1 1.96 0.90 0.17 0.01 0.06 1.24 0.22 0.24 1.15 92.74 5.29:1
C3 4.82 4.12 0.70 3.60 0.05 85.82 2.41:1 75:1 2.60 2.00 0.83 0.02 0.07 1.34 0.09 0.18 1.15 85.82 2.41:1
C4 4.78 4.11 0.67 3.50 0.05 93.37 0.55:1 70:1 2.81 1.20 2.17 0.04 0.05 3.62 0.20 0.14 3.38 93.37 0.55:1
C5 4.47 4.01 0.89 2.60 0.046 92.35 0.34:1 63:1 2.00 0.90 2.67 0.02 0.04 3.92 0.24 0.38 3.62 92.35 0.34:1
Mean 4.90 4.30 0.69 2.98 0.047 92.32 92.32 66:1 2.47 2.47 1.30 0.01 0.04 3.68 0.30 0.19 3.47 92.32 92.32
NS NS NS * NS ** NS ** ** ** NS NS ** NS NS ** **
LSD0.05 0.47 0.42 0.57 0.60 0.23 21.51 21.00 0.21 1.09 2.56 5.37 0.11 0.11 5.76 0.28 0.22 5.79 21.51 21.00
A= Fallow land, B= Oil palm groove, C= Cassava land, OM = Organic Matter, TN = Total Nitrogen, C/N = Carbon-Nitrogen ratio, Av. P = Available Phosphorous, ECEC = Effective Cation Exchange
Capacity, TEB = Total Exchangeable Bases, Alst = Aluminum Saturation, LSD = Least Significant Difference, NS = Non Significant, ∂pH=Delta pH
Relationship among erodibility indices CDR and CDI with selected soil properties are shown on Table 4. Clay-
dispersion ratio (CDR) as in DR is moderate to high. However, CDR had a negative non-significant relationship with
pH in KCl with a value of r = -0.27. There was a high level of significance between Clay dispersion ratio, Bulk
density, Available phosphorus, and Total porosity with values of r =.-0.99, 0.95 and 0.96 respectively. It also had a
non-significant relationship with total exchangeable acidity and Base saturation with values of r = 0.46 and 0.007
respectively. The Clay dispersion index on the other hand had a high positive correlation with Base saturation only
with a value of r=0.97; it equally correlated with pH moderately with a value of r= 0.68 and had a non-significant
relationship with Bulk density with a value of r= 0.01, Total exchangeable acidity had a value of r= 0.47, Base
saturation had a value of r= 0.97, Available phosphorus had a value of r= 0.44, and Total porosity had a value of
r=0.44.
Parameters
CDR CDI
CONCLUSION
The study investigated factors affecting erodibility of soils of Awo-omamma in Imo State to water as affected by land
us types namely fallow land, oil palm plantation and cassava were chosen for the study. The land use types served as
treatments and 5 samples (replicates) were collected from soils under each land use and the experiment was arranged
in a randomized complete block design. Soil samples were subjected to routine laboratory analyses. Variability
among soil properties were estimated using ANOVA and means were separated with LSD at 5% level of probability.
Two indirect measures (clay dispersion ratio and clay dispersion index) were used in accessing erodibility of studied
soils. Results of some physical and chemical properties were related to soil erodibility using correlation coefficient.
The erodibilty varied among the land use types. The susceptibility was highest in fallow land, cassava and lest in oil
palm groove .Results showed that erodibilty was related to percentage sand, silt ,clay, organic matter, total porosity,
soil pH, ECEC, clay dispersion index and ratio. Based on this study, soils of Imo state of Imo state erodible and were
mostly affected by over grazing, slash and burning practices and sand mining. This therefore calls for public
enlightenment programme on erosion and need to adopt environmental friendly land use and management practice to
the rural dwellers with the help of the local government, chairman, the traditional rulers, the village heads and the
youth. Also since it have been observed that oil palms tend to deplete soil nutrients due to long term nutrient
immobilization in the trees and the harvesting of palm fruits which constitute a drain on soil nutrient capital. It is
recommended that other tree species especially those that improve soil fertility into farmlands be integrated in order to
enhance sustainability in the long run. The tree such as Albizia adianthifolia, has been reported to improve soil
organic matter, exchangeable calcium, magnesium, cation exchange capacity and available phosphorus of soil under
its canopy. This will help ensure landscape stability and productivity.
REFERENCES
Ahn,P. M. (1970). West African soils .Oxford Univ. press London.
Akamigbo F. O. R. (1983). Influence of Pedological process on gully Formation in southeastern Nigeria. Nigerian J.
Soil Science 4:112-127.Niger.J.Soil Sci., 4:112-127.
Brady and Well (2002). The Nature and properties of soil. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Bremner, J. M. and Mulvaney, G. S, (1982).Total Nitrogen. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Page, A. L., R. H Miller
and D. R. Keeney (Eds), American Soc. Agron. No.9 Madison, W.I., pp: 595-624.
Evans R. (1980). Mechanism of water erosion and their spatial and temporal controls. An empirical view point. K
Kirkby, M. J. And Morgan, R. P. C. leds soil erosion Willey 109-128.
Gee, G.W and Or (2002). Particle size analysis In:Dane, J.H, and G.C Topps (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 4.
Physical Properties. Soil Sci. Soc Am Book series 5. Madison, WI. Pp. 223-293.
Grossman, H. B and T. G. Reinsch (2002). Bulk density and linear extensibility. In: methods of Soil Analysis. Dane,
J. H. and G. C. Topp (Eds.), part 4. Physical methods. Soil Sci. Soc. A.m. Book series No.5 Madison Wi,
Pp: 201-228.
Heard, J. R., Kladivko, E. J. and Mannering, J.V. (1988). Soil macro porosity, hydraulic conductivity and air
permeability of silty soils under long term conservation tillage in Indiana. Soil Tillage Research. 11: 1-8.
Hudson, N. (1971); Soil conservation; B.T. Batsford ltd., London.
Igwe , C. A., Akamigbo F. O. R.., and Mbagwu J.S.C., 1995. The use of some soil aggregate indices to assess
potential soil loss in soils of southeastern Nigeria. Int. Agrophysics, 9, 95-100.
Igwe, C. A. (2005). Erodibility in relation to water-dispersible clay for some soils of eastern Nigeria. Land Degrad.
develop., 16, 87-96.
Igwe, C.A., F.O.R Akamigbo and J.S.C. Mbagwu, (2002).Soil moisture retention characteristics in relation to
erodibility and texture of some soils of Southeastern Nigeria. E. Afr. Agric. J, 68:17-21
Jackson, M.I., (1959). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice hall Inc. Englewood Cliff,New Jersey 498.
Jungerius, P.D, Levelt, T.W.M. (1964).Clay mineralogy of soil over sedimentary Rocks in Eastern Nigeria. Soil Sci:
97, 89-95.
Jungerius,P.D.(1964):The upper coal measures cuesta in Eastern Nigeria.Zeiteschrife F.Geomar.Supplement band
5:167-176.
Kjaergaard C., de Jonge L.W., Moldrup P., and Schjønning P., (2004). Water-dispersible colloids: effects of
measurement method, clay content, initial soil matric potential, and wetting rate. Vadose Zone J., 3, 403-412.
Lal, R. (1979). No tillage effects on soil properties and maize production in Western Nigeria. Plant Soil 40:321-331.