Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A. Dr. Aditya Pai H - Scopus SCI Index
A. Dr. Aditya Pai H - Scopus SCI Index
I. Introduction
The term “Lead time” [1] refers to the time gap between the initiations of the process where the customer places
the order to the order being delivered to the customer. Ideally the lead time refers to the total time required for
completing the process ordering the product to shipping them to the customer. The issue involved here is the time, the
time required to deliver the product will vary due to various factors like lack of skilled workers, lack of software
tools, insufficient of funds, lack of understanding of the problem from the client’s needs. Lead time has various
advantages:
1. Bringing flexibility especially during rapid changes in the market.
2. In order to beat your competitors by promptly delivering the goods in more efficient way.
3. To avoid problem of losing stocks leading to loss in sales and customers.
4. Effectively meeting the deadlines and maintaining consistency.
A. Problems with Longer Lead Time
It is not for every organization as it has various roadblocks and constraints as a results various projects will be in
the pipe line. The following are various roadblocks generating longer lead time.
1) Handoffs – There is always cultural break down between the development and operational department of the
product development teams. The requirement flows in the forms of batches and queues during the handoff
process. There is an information flow between various departments. Now if there is delay in sending of the
information from one team to another organization then there is potential of more batches of the information
in the pipeline. As a result there will be more ambiguity between the teams and result in the high costs and
failed releases.
2) Approval Processes – Insufficient data sharing between the various departments leads to more complexity
especially in the larger organization where without the data sharing the approval process is near to impossible
as a results it frustrate the delivery team. Also the quality of the product will also be reduced.
3) Environment Management and Provisioning – What a development team requires is the environment where
they can test the new features. Lack of the environment availability especially the version control leads to the
delay in solving the problem. For example if there is version control software which has the database of all
the versions of the software. Consider a software has Version 1, 2 and 3, where version 3 is the updated
software. Now the updated software is in Version 3. Version Control access is given to the team then it
makes the job the developer easy. Without the availability of such an environment it leads to poor
understanding and poor scheduling for development of the newer version software as we will not have
reference point to as to what changes has being done in the previous version software. Leading to delay in the
release and the increase in the cost of deployment during the release.
4) Deployments of the software manually – Manual deployment of the software leads to more error as it is
difficult to deploy the large code manually. Thus there is a need for the automated deployment where it can
reduce the lead time by 90%. The problem with manual deployment is that it is not as reliable as the
automated process and often there is a chance of repetition while deploying the code.
5) Manual Software Testing – It is always advisable to have the code tested using automated testing especially
when the scale of the project is huge, if in that case the manual testing is used then the process of undergoing
test is slow, also the amount of bug discovered is less and amount of investment on time and money is also
huge as it requires more man power to find out all the bugs in the software.
B. Approach Followed
The survey is carried out in various IT sectors – SMEs, PSUs, Sole Proprietors, Private and Public Sector. The
analysis of the respondents is done in Section IVA. To understand the non-value added activities and longer lead time
we carried out the study in the SMEs. The supporting case study in Section IVB of this paper explains about the
‘wastes’ which are nothing but the factors that affect lead time. In the Section IVC we will carry out Value Stream
Mapping and Failure Mode Effective Analysis that gives the statistical description of the reason behind the longer
lead time.
The findings of the paper is that - LSS when applied to the Global Supply Chain eliminates defects in the
produced good thus increasing overall efficiency. Industry 4.0 and IIoT helps to improve the efficiency of production.
It helps in faster, efficient and systematic management of SCM activities globally.
The author Man Mohan Siddh et.al. [5] in the paper explains that lean manufacturing is one of the initiatives taken
by major businesses all around the world that have been trying to adopt in order to remain competitive in the
increasingly global market and six sigma was an American “invention”. The central idea behind six sigma is to
measure the “defects” that are there in the process. The paper tells how integrating supply chain with the lean
practices and six sigma methodologies can produce superior products with optimal results where the processes can be
changed from slow to fast by lean manufacturing.
C. Value Stream Mapping
According to W. D. Lin et.al. [6] Aims in improving cash to cash cycle time in the machines by using the VSM
that detects the waste in the process and by using Discrete Event Simulation. The author shows the demonstration
through the case study on how the reduction is done and the results show that through the integration of the VSM and
DES improves the C2C cycle time significantly.
According to Qingqi Liu et.al. [7] the main aim is to see lean production mechanisms that are being applied by
many companies for manufacturing, has an advantage of keeping an edge from its competitors. The paper uses the
VSM tool to identify the approaches to eliminate the wastes during the production process [10] [11] [12].
D. Failure Mode Effective Analysis
According to Baiqiao Huang et.al. [8], the paper aims in classifying the reasons for software failure modes. The
paper shows there are two classification of failure modes one is general failure and another is special failure. The
author has explained the classification with the help of the case studies [13] [14] [15]. According to Dong Nguyen
et.al. [9] The paper presents very apt way of solving the problem that is FMEA. This approach provides all the
information that is causing the failure and their effect on the software system during each process. FMEA also checks
what the probable failures are at each stage and what the corrective actions to be taken.
communication were not up to the mark. Thus high level requirement of each feature were documented in JIRA tool
product backlog.
Initial state of each such story is open (using JIRA tool). When taken to sprint it was ready for the development
state. Developer picked that story and set it as in the development state. When development completed it was turned
to ready to test state.
Testers tested whether all the feature included were working and were then turn the story to ready for showcase
state. When it was showcased to the client, the story was then set to the closed state. In this way after the end of every
sprint all the committed stories are set to closed state.
C. Value Stream Mapping and Failure Mode Effective Analysis
The following figure explains about Value Stream Mapping Technique using Luz Tool carried by another SME in
Embitel Technologies, Bangalore
Figure 6: The Project Description Tab describing about the Client information
Figure 11: Chart Summary of Planned Days vs. Days Utilized and Total Income vs Total Costs
The above Figure 6 to 11 shows the snapshot of the project carried out – which is an insurance based company
performing the following tasks: At first the company using the Luz tool registers client’s company profile. Followed
by the project undertaken from the client along with project price, schedule date and the completion date. In the next
tab the company (contractor) filled the number of staffs undertaking each deliverables where the scope of each
deliverables (functionalities of the modules) were defined which is nothing but the Value Stream Mapping. Once
defined after the approval from the team leaders and the project managers the deliverables are frozen. Followed by the
allocation of the staff members that are required to work in the scheduled period, based on which the project schedule
is planned. The team now goes into development and for every module or the deliverables the Gantt chart is plotted
which shows the delay in lead time based on which Failure Mode Effective Analysis is being done (as shown in
Figure 9 to 11)
References
[1] Shahidul Kader, Maeen Md. and Khairul Akter. "Analysis of the Factors affecting the lead time for export
of readymade apparels from Bangladesh; Proposals for Strategic reduction of lead time", European
Scientific Journal November 2014 edition vol.10, No.33 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431.
[2] Kupiainen, E., Mäntylä M. V., Itkonen J., "Using Metrics in Agile and Lean Software Development -A
Systematic Literature Review of Industrial Studies", Information and Software Technology, 2015.
[3] Brian Fitzgerald, Klaas-Jan Stol, Ryan O'Sullivan and Donal O'Brien, "Scaling agile methods to regulated
environments: an industry case study", ICSE '13 Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on
Software Engineering, Pages 863-872.
[4] Athul Jayaram, "Lean Six Sigma Approach for Global Supply Chain Management using Industry 4.0 and
IIoT", 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), pp. 89–94, 2016.
[5] Man Mohan Siddh, Gunjan Soni, Gaurav Gadekar and Rakesh Jain, “Integrating lean six sigma and supply
chain approach for quality and business performance”, 2nd International Conference on Business and
Information Management (ICBIM), pp. 53–57, 2014.
[6] W. D. Lin, E. S. Chan and L. F. Kwan "Integrated value stream mapping and simulation for cash-to-cash
cycle time improvement of a machining facility", IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering
and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2017.
[7] Qingqi Liu and Hualong Yang "Lean implementation through value stream mapping: A case study of a
footwear manufacturer", 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), 2017.
[8] Baiqiao Huang, Hong Zhang and Minyan Lu "Software FMEA approach based on failure modes database",
8th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, 2009.
[9] Dong Nguyen "Failure modes and effects analysis for software reliability", Annual Reliability and
Maintainability Symposium. 2001 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity
(Cat. No.01CH37179), Jan. 2001.
[10] S. M. Zahraee, A. Hashemi, A. A. Abdi, A. Shahpanah, J. M. Rohani, Lean manufacturing implementation
through value stream mapping: a case study, Jurnal Teknologi, Vol.68, No.3, 119-124, 2014.
[11] M. Poppendieck, P. Llc, Principles of lean thinking. It Management Select, 2011.
[12] M. Rother, J. Shook, Learning to See–Value-Stream Mapping to Create Value and Eliminate Muda. Lean
Enterprise Institute, Cambridge (US), 1–4, 2009.
[13] P.L. Goddard, Software FMEA Techniques. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2000.
[14] J.B. Bowles, and C. Wan, “Software Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for a Small Embedded Control
System,” Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability symposium, 2001.
[15] N. Ozarin, “Failure Modes and Effects Analysis during Design of Computer Software,” RAMS, 2004.