Design Report Research Centre R1

DESIGN BASIS REPORT FOR
RESEARCH CENTER
1. DESIGN BASIS
Design Codes:
Reinforced concrete design code IS 456 - 2000
Dead loads IS – 875 Part 1 - 1987
Live loads IS – 875 Part 2 - 1987
Wind forces IS – 875 Part 3 - 2015
Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IS 1893 Part 1 - 2016

(General provisions and buildings)
Ductile Design and Detailing of Reinforced Concrete

Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces- IS 13920 : 2016
Code of practice
Design Loads:
Unit weight of reinforced concrete 25 kN/m3
Unit weight of masnory work 20 kN/m3
Basic wind speed 50 m/s
Seismic Zone of the building V
Load Combinations:
1) 1.5 Dead loads + 1.5 Imposed loads
2) 1.2 Dead loads + 1.2 Imposed loads ± 1.2 (ELx ±0.3ELy ±0.3ELz)
2) 1.2 Dead loads + 1.2 Imposed loads ± 1.2 (Ely± 0.3ELx ±0.3ELz)
4) 1.5 Dead loads ± 1.5 (ELx ±0.3ELy ±0.3ELz)
5) 1.5 Dead loads ± 1.5 (Ely ± 0.3ELx ±0.3ELz)
6) 0.9 Dead loads ± 1.5 (ELx ±0.3ELy ±0.3ELz)
7) 0.9 Dead loads ± 1.5 (Ely± 0.3ELx ±0.3ELz)
Elx,y,z - Earthquake load in horizontal and vertical directions
Design method
Limit state method of design (As per IS 456 - 2000)
Grade:
Grade of concrete M 25
Grade of reinforcement Fe 500
2. CALCULATION OF BASE SHEAR
As per IS 1893( Part I): 2016:
Zone factor of the structure Z= 0.36 (Zone - V)
Importance factor I= 1.2 P.NO-19
Response spectrum reduction factor R= 5 P.NO-20
Height of building (h) = 14.575 m
Base dimension (d) = 15.76 m
Fundamental natural period of vibration of the

structure (with brick in fill & height consideration)
Ta = 0.09h/√d) (RC)
0.3304 Sec
Spectral acceleration coefficient (Sa/g) = 2.500 (Medium soil sites)
Horizontal seismic coefficient Ah = Z/2 I/R Sa/g = 0.108
Seismic Weight of the Building W = 13943.440 kN
Design lateral force Vb = Ah*W 1505.89 kN

3. LOAD CALCULATION
i). Dead load:
Self weight of the structure (columns, beams) is automated by the software for the corresponding member sizes.
Dead load on the slab:
Thickness of the slab t = 150 mm
Weight of floor slab w = 3.75 kN/m²
Weight of floor finishes (assumed) wf = 1.00 kN/m²
Load due to partition walls (assumed) = 1.50 kN/m²
Total = 6.250 kN/m²

Dead load due to Wall :
Unit weight of brick masnory wb = 20 kN/m3
Width of wall bw = 0.23 m
Height of wall (Total height - Depth of beam)

(4.45m - 0.45m) hw = 4 m
Weight of wall per metre run wb*bw*hw = 18.40 kN/m
Wall Load after deduction of doors and windows(say) = 16.40 kN/m
ii). Live load:
As per IS 875 Part 2,

Table 2 - Clause 4.1
Live load (conference room and store room) 5.00 kN/m²
Live load in toilet area 2.00 kN/m²
Live load (access not provided except for maintenance) 0.75 kN/m²
iii). Wind load:

As per IS 875 Part 3,
Basic wind speed Vb = 50 m/s
Risk factor K1 = 1.0
Terrain coefficient K2 = 1.025 Category 2
Topography factor K3 = 1.0
Importance factor K4 = 1.0 (non cyclonic region)

Design wind speed Vz Vb*K1*K2*K3*K4 51.225 m/s
Wind pressure Pz 0.6 Vz² = 1.57 kN/m²
Design wind pressure Pd Kd*Ka*Kc*pz
Wind directionality factor Kd = 0.9
Area averaging factor Ka = 0.89
Combination factor Kc = 1.0
Design wind pressure Pd Kd*Ka*Kc*pz = 1.261 kN/m²
Wind loads acting on the structure,
As per IS 875 Part 3

C
A
B
x
Wind
D
Height of the building to ridge h = 12.45 m
Lesser horizontal dimension w = 15.76 m
Greater horizontal dimension l = 23.3 m
Ratio h/w = 0.79
Ratio l/w = 1.48
Pd = 1.261 kN/m²
0.7*pz = 1.102 kN/m²
Design wind pressure Pd 1.261 kN/m² > 0.7*pz

Buildings with larger than 20 % openings, the Internal pressure coefficient Cpi = ±0.7
As per Table 5 in IS 875 (Part 3)-2015, External pressure coefficients,

WIND ANGLE 0o (+Cpi)
0.60 1.30
0.70 0.7 0.25 0.00 0.95
0.60 1.30
WIND ANGLE 0o (-Cpi)
0.60 0.10
0.70 0.7 0.25 1.40 0.45
0.60 0.10
WIND ANGLE 0o (+Cpi) WIND ANGLE 0o (-Cpi)

o o
0 A B C D 0 A B C D
Cpe 0.7 -0.25 -0.6 -0.6 Cpe 0.7 -0.25 -0.6 -0.6
+ Cpi 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 - Cpi -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7
Cpe-Cpi 0 0.95 1.3 1.3 Cpe-Cpi 1.4 0.45 0.1 0.1
(Cpe - Cpi) (Cpe - Cpi)
*Pd 0.000 1.198 1.639 1.639 *Pd 1.76553 0.567 0.1261 0.1261
kN/m² kN/m² kN/m² kN/m² kN/m² kN/m² kN/m² kN/m²
WIND ANGLE 90o (+Cpi)
0.70 0.00
0.60 0.7 0.60 1.30 1.30
0.25 0.95
WIND ANGLE 90o (-Cpi)
0.70 1.40
0.60 0.7 0.60 0.10 0.10
0.25 0.45
WIND ANGLE 90o (+Cpi) WIND ANGLE 90o (-Cpi)

o o
90 A B C D 90 A B C D
Cpe -0.5 -0.5 0.7 -0.2 Cpe -0.5 -0.5 0.7 -0.2
+ Cpi 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 - Cpi -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7
Cpe-Cpi 1.3 1.3 0 0.95 Cpe-Cpi 0.1 0.1 1.4 0.45
(Cpe - Cpi) (Cpe - Cpi)
*Pd 1.6394231 1.639 0.000 1.198 *Pd 0.12611 0.126 1.7655 0.57
kN/m² kN/m² kN/m² kN/m² kN/m² kN/m² kN/m² kN/m²
Wind angle 0o
Maximum pressure on the surface/Net wind pressure
(Cpe - Cpi).Pd = 1.766 kN/m²
Exposed area of the building to the wind A l *h 290.09 m²
Total wind load on the surface F (Cpe - Cpi).Pd*A kN
= 512.155 kN
Wind angle 90o
Maximum pressure on the surface/Net wind pressure
(Cpe - Cpi).Pd = 1.766 kN/m²
Exposed area of the building to the wind A l *h 196.21 m²
Total wind load on the surface F (Cpe - Cpi).Pd*A
= 346.419 kN
Total wind load on the structure - wind in 0 o 512.155 kN
Total wind load on the structure - wind in 90 o 346.42 kN
Total seismic weight of the structure W = 13943.44 kN
Horizontal seismic coefficient Ah = 0.108
Total base shear for earthquake analysis W. Ah = 1505.89 kN

> 512.15 kN
Hence wind analysis is not considered in our analysis.

4. ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE
Analysis - I : MAIN BUILDING
The line diagram of the analysis model is as shown below.
Analysis -II : FOUR PILE GROUP ANALYSIS

Analysis - III : THREE PILE GROUP ANALYSIS
Analysis - IV : TWO PILE GROUP ANALYSIS
Analysis - V :6 PILE GROUP (GRID-E1 & F1 ):

Analysis - VI :6 PILE GROUP(GRID-G4 & G5) :
Analysis
(i). The building is a RCC framed structure with columns and beams of appropriate
section properties.
(ii). As the effect of wind load was found to be less than that of earthquake base shear,
wind load was not considered in the analysis.
(iii). A combination with load cases of self weight, live load and seismic load is used for
the design of members.
5.DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATION
The analysis was carrried out for all pile groups. The typical design calculations are
furnished below from the analysis:
TYPICAL PILE CAP DESIGN CALCULATION:
Column Sizes in pile group 300 x 450 mm

300 x 600 mm
230 x 450 mm
The size of the pile cap for 9 pile group 3500 x 5000 mm
2500 x 3900 mm
Diameter of pile 500 mm
Depth of pile below existing ground level 10 m
The thickness of pile cap (9-pile group) 1000 mm
Effective thickness (750-100-16-16/2) d = 626 mm
The cover for the pile 50 mm
Concrete Grade M 25
Grade of Reinforcement Fe 500
The cover for pile cap

Top 75 mm
Bottom 100 mm
The pile is bored cast in-situ pile.
P.C.C of 100mm thick was provided under the pile cap as shown in the drawing.
DESIGN FOR FOUR PILE GROUP(TYP) :

From the Analysis I ( node no 5) ,the critical loads on 4 pile group are as follows:
Loads:
Node L/C Force-X kN Force-Y kN Force-Z kN Moment-X kNm Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm
Maximum axial force:

5 30 -12.55 941.188 90.565 177.501 0.596 14.018
Maximum lateral force:

5 30 -12.55 941.188 90.565 177.501 0.596 14.018
Maximum bending moment:

5 30 -12.55 941.188 90.565 177.501 0.596 14.018
i) Design for Top Reinforcement
From Analysis II,

The design bending moments for the pile cap
Top 40 kN.m
2
Mu/bd^2 0.10 N/mm
pt 0.12 %(min)
Ast required Pt*b*d/100 900 mm²
Provided reinforcement Y 12 @ 125 mm c/c (On both ways)
ii) Design for Bottom Reinforcement
From Analysis II,

Bottom 280 kN.m
2
Mu/bd^2 0.71 N/mm
pt 0.170 %
Ast required Pt*b*d/100 1064.2 mm²
Check for Two way shear:
The size of the pile cap for four pile group 2250 x 2250 mm
Provided thickness D = 750 mm

Cover for pile cap Top = 75 mm
Bottom = 100 mm
Effective thickness (750-100-16-16/2)
d = 626 mm
Column dimension l = 300 mm
b = 600 mm
Axial load from column = 941.188 kN

Factored Axial load from column = 1411.782 kN
Punching shear at a distance d/2 from face of column = 1411.782 kN

Considering equivalent square,
The perimeter of the critical section = 4304 mm
Puching shear stress = Punching shear force

Perimeter x effectve thickness
= 0.524 N/mm2
Allowable shear stress = ' = ks x c
ks = 0.5 +ß
ß = 1.00
ks = 1.50
if ks >1, then ks =1
= 0.25fck
2
1.250 N/mm
2
' = 1.25 N/mm
0.524 N/mm2 is less than the allowable stress 1.25 N/mm2

The thickness is sufficient to resist the punching shear force.
Check for One way shear:
For cantilever slab, total shear force along critical section

Self weight of pile cap = 2.25x2.25x0.75x25
= 94.921875 kN
Total factored load Pu = 1506.703875 kN

No of piles along one side of axis = 4
Compressive load on each pile about x-x axis
= 1506.704 + 177.501 x 1.5

4 4 x 0.625
= 376.67+106.50 kN
= 483.17 kN
Design working load = 483.17 = 322.11 kN

1.5
Nominal shear stress = Vu/B*d
= 0.834 N/mm
2
For pt (provided) = 0.25%

from table19 in IS 456 the design strength is 0.36 N/mm2
Shear to be carried out by lateral reinforcements
Vus = ( 0.834-0.36)*626*1026*10 -3
= 304.44 kN
Vus /d = 304.44 /62.6

= 4.863 kN/cm
SP16 Table 62,
Dia of lateral reinforcement 12 mm
Required spacing of lateral reinforcement 165 mm
Provided lateral reinforcement Y 12@ 125 mm c/c
Hence provided reinforcements are sufficient.
DESIGN FOR THREE PILE GROUP(TYP) :

From the Analysis I (node no 27) ,the critical loads on 3 pile group are as follows:
Loads:
27 28 -2.615 619.099 -32.138 -38.542 0.224 14.559
27 15 62.257 447.423 -12.079 -10.72 0.154 -79.805
27 15 62.257 447.423 -12.079 -10.72 0.154 -79.805

From Analysis III,
Top 66.6 kN.m
2
Mu/bd^2 0.17 N/mm
pt 0.12 %
(min)
Provided reinforcement Y 12 @125mm c/c (On both ways)
From Analysis III,

Bottom 240 kN.m
2
Mu/bd^2 0.61 N/mm
pt 0.154 %

Bottom = 100 mm
d = 626 mm
b = 300 mm



= 0.370 N/mm2
ks = 0.5 +ß
ß = 1.00
ks = 1.50
= 0.25fck
2
1.250 N/mm
2
' = 1.25 N/mm

Self weight of pile cap = 75.25 kN
= 1003.899 + 38.542 x 1.5

3 3 x 0.625
= 334.63+30.83 kN
= 365.46 kN
Design working load = 365.46 = 243.64 kN

1.5

= 0.543 N/mm
2

Vus = ( 0.543-0.36)*626*1026*10 -3
= 117.53 kN
Vus /d = 117.53 /62.6

= 1.877 kN/cm
SP16 Table 62,
DESIGN FOR TWO PILE GROUP(TYP) :

From the Analysis I (node no 4) ,the critical loads on 2 pile group are as follows:
Loads:
4 59 29.13 447.395 2.444 17.67 0.382 -33.817
4 24 -12.382 328.632 -51.103 -68.805 -1.18 13.801
4 27 10.514 406.841 34.492 70.321 1.124 -12.892

From Analysis IV,

Top 40 kN.m
2
Mu/bd^2 0.10 N/mm
pt 0.12 %(min)
Provided reinforcement Y 12@ 125 mm c/c (On both ways)
From Analysis IV,

Bottom 280 kN.m
2
Mu/bd^2 0.71 N/mm
pt 0.179 %

The size of the pile cap for Two pile group 2250 x 1000 mm

Bottom = 100 mm
d = 626 mm
b = 600 mm



2
= 0.249 N/mm
ks = 0.5 +ß
ß = 1.00
ks = 1.50
= 0.25fck
2
1.250 N/mm
2
' = 1.25 N/mm


Self weight of pile cap = 2.25x1x0.75x25
= 42.1875 kN
= 713.28 + 17.67 x 1.5

2 2 x 0.625
= 356.64+21.204 kN
= 377.844 kN
Design working load = 377.844 = 251.896

1.5

= 0.652 N/mm
2

Vus = ( 0.652-0.36)*626*1000*10 -3
= 182.792 kN
Vus /d = 182.792 /62.6

= 2.920 kN/cm
SP16 Table 62,
Check for minimum reinforcement of pile cap:
Minimum Area of reinforcement = 0.06% bD

= 450 mm2
Hence provided reinforcement for different pile groups are sufficient.

DESIGN FOR 6 PILE GROUP (GRID-E1 & F1 ):
Loads:
Maximum axial force Fy:

1 11 66.97 1005.494 16.629 13.711 0.413 -121.4
Maximum lateral force Fx:

1 12 -68.608 -96.252 15.287 11.035 -0.722 126.093
Maximum lateral force Fz:

1 27 18.081 707.591 32.998 42.13 -0.118 -32.609
Maximum bending moment Mx:

1 24 -18.486 135.1 -15.512 -42.543 -0.077 35.432
Maximum bending moment Mz:

1 12 -68.608 -96.252 15.287 11.035 -0.722 126.093
Design for pile cap:
From Analysis V,
Top 250 kN.m
2
Mu/bd^2 0.64 N/mm
pt 0.154 %(min)
From Analysis V,
Bottom 470 kN.m
2
Mu/bd^2 1.20 N/mm
pt 0.293 %
Hence the provided reinforcement is ok.

DESIGN FOR 6 PILE GROUP(GRID-G4 & G5) :
Loads:
Maximum axial force Fy:

12 28 -8.674 744.626 -112.755 -185.479 -0.344 16.694
Maximum lateral force Fx:

12 10 44.841 473.574 -34.135 -54.693 0.295 -51.546
Maximum lateral force Fz:

12 28 -8.674 744.626 -112.755 -185.479 -0.344 16.694
Maximum bending moment Mx:

12 24 -8.668 716.634 -112.707 -185.48 -0.342 16.695
Maximum bending moment Mz:

12 12 -43.102 550.826 28.751 54.658 -0.256 57.3
Design for pile cap:

From Analysis VI,
Top 200 kN.m
2
Mu/bd^2 0.51 N/mm
pt 0.12 %(min)

From Analysis VI,

Bottom 450 kN.m
2
Mu/bd^2 1.15 N/mm
pt 0.280 %
Hence the provided reinforcement is ok.

PILE DESIGN- 500MM DIA PILE
From the Analysis II

Load on 500mm dia pile
Vertical compression 376 kN
Tensile(uplift) nil
Lateral load 23.486 kN
From the Analysis III

Tensile(uplift) nil
From the Analysis IV

Tensile(uplift) nil
From the Analysis V

Tensile(uplift) 94 kN
.
From the Analysis VI

Tensile(uplift) nil
Depth of pile from Existing ground level 10 m
Design of reinforcement for2, 3, 4, 6 and 9 pile groups:
Area of reinforcement required = 2042 mm²
Minimum Area of reinforcement = 0.80%

1570 mm²
Provided area of reinforcement = 12-Y16 (2412 mm²)
Hence provided reinforcement is adequate

6. COLUMN
TYPICAL COLUMN DESIGN

From the Analysis I (C5- Beam.No 96 ) :
Mx
Grade of concrete M25 = 25 N/mm²

Column width B = 300 mm
Column depth D = 600 mm
My
Column height H = 4 m
Clear cover = 40 mm
Dia of reinforcement = 20 mm
Effective cover (40+10+(20/2)) d' = 60 mm
Axial load on column P = 127.54 kN
Bending Moment Mx = 36.62 kN.m
Bending Moment My = 39.89 kN.m
Effective length about X direction = 4m

(1.0 L)
Effective length about Y direction = 4m

(1.0 x L)
Minimum eccentriciy about X (Greater of L/500+D/30 & 20) = 28 mm
Minimum eccentricity moment about X = 3.57 kN.m

< 36.62
Actual initial moment Mx = 36.62 kN.m

(Max. of Mx & Minimum eccentricity moment)
Minimum eccentriciy about Y (Greater of L/500+b/30 & 20) = 20.000 mm
Minimum eccentricity moment about Y = 2.5508 kN.m

< 39.89
Actual initial moment My = 39.89 kN.m

(Max. of My & Minimum eccentricity moment)
Additional slenderness moment about X (PuD/2000x(lex/D)²) = 2.55 kN.m
Additional slenderness moment about Y (Pub/2000x(ley/b)²) = 5.10 kN.m
Total moment about X direction = 39.17 kN.m

Total moment about Y direction = 44.99 kN.m
Pu/fck x b xd = 127.54x1.5x1000 = 0.043

25x300x600
Assume Pt 0.8to4% = 3.3 %

2
Ast = 3.3x300x600/100 = 5940 mm
Pt/fck = 3.3/25 = 0.132
Moment capacity
Coefficiant for Mux1 (d'/D = 0.1 ) = 0.2
Coefficiant for Muy1 (d'/b = 0.2 ) = 0.14
Mux1 = 0.2x25x300x600^2 = 540.00 kN.m

1000000
Muy1 = 0.14x25x300^2x600 = 189.00 kN.m

1000000
Axial load carrying capacity Puz = (0.45x25x300x600)+(0.75x415x5940) = 3873.83 kN

1000
Pu/Puz = 127.54x1.5/3873.825 = 0.049
an = 1.0000 0.7490
1
Interaction ratio, = 39.17x1.5
540
1
44.99x1.5 = 0.47
189
< 1
Hence safe
Hence provided 6 Y25+10 Y20 is adequate.

7. BEAM DESIGN
Design parameters
Length of beam L 5.1 m
Breadth of the beam B 300 mm
Depth of the beam D 600 mm
Cover 50 mm
Main bar dia 20 mm
Stirrups dia S 8 mm
Number of main bar layers 1
Effective depth (600-50-8-20/2) d 532 mm
Effective cover (50+8+(20/2)) d' 68 mm
d' /d 0.113
2
Concrete grade M25 25 N/mm
2
Steel grade Fe 500 N/mm
From the Analysis I

Beam no: (940)
Max + ve moment 239 kN.m
Max - ve moment 141 kN.m
Max shear 147 kN
Design for +ve moment
Design moment Mu 239.0 kN.m
d' /d 0.128
Mu/bd2 2.815 N/mm

2
pt 0.777 ( sp : 16 table 3)
Ast Pt*b*d/100 1240 mm²
Area of steel required 1240 mm²

0.777%
Area of steel provided 1570 mm²

0.984%
Provided 3 Y20 + 2 Y20 extra
Design for -ve moment
Design moment Mu 141.0 kN.m
d' /d 0.128
Mu/bd2 1.661 N/mm

2
% of area of steel Pt 0.414 ( sp : 16 table 3)
Ast Pt*b*d/100 661 mm²
Area of steel required 661 mm²

0.414%
Area of steel provided 1570 mm²

0.984%
Provided 3 Y20 + 2 Y20 extra

Design for shear
Shear force, Vu 147 kN
Vu/b*d= 0.92
2
Nominal Shear Stress, = 0.92 N / mm
2
Maximum Shear Stress cmax = 3.1 N / mm
max >
Calculation of
2
Area of steel 1570 mm
To find pt= 100 (As/bd) 0.98
2
Sp16 Table 61, 0.636 N/mm
shear capacity of concrete section *bd 101.51 kN
Shear to be carried by stirrups Vus= Vs- bd= 45.4944 kN

Vus/d 0.855 kN/cm
SP16 Table 62,
Dia of stirrups 8 mm
spacing of stirrups 300 mm
Required Stirrups 2L Y8 @ 300 mm C/C
Provided Stirrups 2L Y8 @ 90 / 150 mm C/C

8. SLAB
TYPICAL DESIGN OF SLAB :
Slab thickness assumed t 150 mm
Slab cover 30 mm
Effective thickness of slab (150-30-10/2) d 115 mm
Load due to slab self weight t*25/1000 3.750 kN/m²
Floor finishes 1.0 kN/m²
Partition wall load 1.5 kN/m²
Total dead load from slab to the beams 6.250 kN/m²
Live load from the slab 5.00 kN/m²

(access not provided except for maintenance)
Total load per metre² of slab 11.250 kN/m²
Concrete grade M25 25 N/mm2
2
Steel grade Fe 500 N/mm
Design results,
Edge condition : one long edge dicontinuous

Slab thickness 150 mm
Slab size 5.25 x 3.295
Lx 3.295 m
Ly 5.25 m
Ly / Lx ratio 1.59
For -ve moment shorter direction
Moment coefficient 0.07
Design Moment Mu = 12.82 kN-m
Effective depth d = 115 mm
Mu/bd2 0.97 N/mm2
Percentage of reinforcement ,Pt = 0.242 %
Area of steel required 278.3 mm2
Provided Y10 @ 150 mm c/c

For -ve moment longer direction
Mu/bd2 0.55 N/mm2
Area of steel required 180 mm2
Provided Y8 @150 mm c/c
For +ve moment shorter direction
Mu/bd2 0.75 N/mm2
Area of steel required 205.85 mm2
Provided Y10 @ 150 mm c/c
For +ve moment longer direction
Mu/bd2 0.42 N/mm2
Area of steel required 180 mm2
Provided Y8 @150 mm c/c
Hence provided reinforcement is adequate

Design Report Research Centre R1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Design Report Research Centre R1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design Report Research Centre R1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DESIGN BASIS REPORT FOR

Dead loads IS – 875 Part 1 - 1987

Live loads IS – 875 Part 2 - 1987

Wind forces IS – 875 Part 3 - 2015

Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IS 1893 Part 1 - 2016

Ductile Design and Detailing of Reinforced Concrete

Unit weight of masnory work 20 kN/m3

Basic wind speed 50 m/s

Seismic Zone of the building V

4) 1.5 Dead loads ± 1.5 (ELx ±0.3ELy ±0.3ELz)

5) 1.5 Dead loads ± 1.5 (Ely ± 0.3ELx ±0.3ELz)

6) 0.9 Dead loads ± 1.5 (ELx ±0.3ELy ±0.3ELz)

7) 0.9 Dead loads ± 1.5 (Ely± 0.3ELx ±0.3ELz)

Elx,y,z - Earthquake load in horizontal and vertical directions

As per IS 1893( Part I): 2016:

Zone factor of the structure Z= 0.36 (Zone - V)

Importance factor I= 1.2 P.NO-19

Response spectrum reduction factor R= 5 P.NO-20

Height of building (h) = 14.575 m

Base dimension (d) = 15.76 m

Fundamental natural period of vibration of the

Spectral acceleration coefficient (Sa/g) = 2.500 (Medium soil sites)

Horizontal seismic coefficient Ah = Z/2 I/R Sa/g = 0.108

Seismic Weight of the Building W = 13943.440 kN

Design lateral force Vb = Ah*W 1505.89 kN

i). Dead load:

Dead load on the slab:

Thickness of the slab t = 150 mm

Weight of floor slab w = 3.75 kN/m²

Weight of floor finishes (assumed) wf = 1.00 kN/m²

Load due to partition walls (assumed) = 1.50 kN/m²

Total = 6.250 kN/m²

Unit weight of brick masnory wb = 20 kN/m3

Width of wall bw = 0.23 m

Height of wall (Total height - Depth of beam)

Weight of wall per metre run wb*bw*hw = 18.40 kN/m

Wall Load after deduction of doors and windows(say) = 16.40 kN/m

ii). Live load:

As per IS 875 Part 2,

Live load (conference room and store room) 5.00 kN/m²

Live load in toilet area 2.00 kN/m²

iii). Wind load:

Basic wind speed Vb = 50 m/s

Risk factor K1 = 1.0

Terrain coefficient K2 = 1.025 Category 2

Topography factor K3 = 1.0

Importance factor K4 = 1.0 (non cyclonic region)

Wind pressure Pz 0.6 Vz² = 1.57 kN/m²

Design wind pressure Pd Kd*Ka*Kc*pz

Wind directionality factor Kd = 0.9

Area averaging factor Ka = 0.89

Combination factor Kc = 1.0

Design wind pressure Pd Kd*Ka*Kc*pz = 1.261 kN/m²

Wind loads acting on the structure,

As per IS 875 Part 3

Lesser horizontal dimension w = 15.76 m

Greater horizontal dimension l = 23.3 m

Ratio h/w = 0.79

Weight of wall per metre run wbbwhw = 18.40 kN/m

Design wind pressure Pd KdKaKc*pz

Design wind pressure Pd KdKaKc*pz = 1.261 kN/m²