Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nathaniel Ross - The As If Concept
Nathaniel Ross - The As If Concept
Nathaniel Ross - The As If Concept
ROSS,N . D .
I
T REQUIRES no more than a cursory consideration of “as if” phe-
nomena to open up a multitude of vistas for investigation. Be-
fore introducing this venture by way of a survey of the literature
-which I intend to present under a somewhat unconventional
plan-I should like to call attention to certain semantic and con-
ceptual ambiguities concerning this subject, and perhaps to intro-
duce some clarity into them.
With regard to the former, the semantic question, this will
not afford us much difficulty. When Helene Deutsch (5) first pub-
lished her classical paper on the “as if” personality, she made cer-
tain to define the term she was using as having “nothing to do with
Vaihinger’s system of ‘fictions’ and the philosophy of ‘As If‘ ” (p.
263). It has been used ever since in the psychoanalytic literature in
her restricted sense, as applying to certain individuals suffering
from a character disorder, which “forces on the observer the in-
escapable impression that the individual’s whole relationship to
life has something about it which is lacking in genuineness and yet
outwardly runs along ‘as if‘ it were complete” (p. 263). To elabo-
rate further upon the clinical picture presented by such individ-
uals, Deutsch observed that they did not seem to be aware of their
defect in feeling; to all outward appearances they had good intelli-
gence, displayed well-ordered emotional expressiveness, might
even be talented, and often impressed others as establishing in-
tense, loving, friendly, and sympathetic relationships. Nevertheless,
sooner or later, people acquainted with these “as if” personalities
would become aware of something which intangibly and indefin-
ably obtruded itself in their contact with people, and would ask,
59
limatory aspects of “as if” states, and others. It is thus not difficult
to see why I have found it necessary to investigate the literature
from so many aspects in order to determine which contributions
might shed light on this subject. I cannot claim to have done this
with the thoroughness I believe the task requires, but I hope to
touch upon most of these subjects as they may be relevant to the
“as if” phenomenon. I n order to do so with some degree of organi-
zation, I have found it wise to disregard chronology and follow a
scheme which attempts to subsume various contributions under
their essential subject headings.
T h e first group of papers I shall discuss are clinical in their
primary orientation, but all contain theoretical illuminations of
our problem. I n 1938, Eidelberg (8) published a report on an
“as if” personality in a paper called “Pseudo-Identification,” in
which he described a patient who prided himself on his “ideal”
method of adapting himself to reality-by agreeing with every-
body, he protected himself from attack. H e also boasted of being
able to guess with invariable accuracy the attitudes and feelings
of others. In reality, he told Eidelberg, people had no effect on
him and he never really accepted their opinions-he was merely
playing a game. However, it was clear to the author that this man
did not have the control over his behavior which he claimed, for
he was quite incapable of behaving in any other way. T o Eidel-
berg, it appeared that the patient was continually protecting him-
self against narcissistic mortification by projecting his own wishes
(and opinions) onto others and, in addition, his own anticipated
narcissistic mortification at the possibility of being rejected. I n
other words, he did not really understand the feelings of others at
all, as it frequently appears “as if” personalities do. hfy own
opinion is that this is essentially true, because of the absence of
affective depth in them, but such individuals d o have an almost
uncanny ability to discern the more superficial motivations of
others-if these are esseiatially oral and anaclitic in nature. Eidel-
berg found it difficult to understand clearly the psychic processes
at work in cases such as he described, because:
1. Although the type of identification seemed to be a primary
one, this could not really be so, because they were capable of dif-
ferentiating between self and object.
Siirnmary
It is perhaps more fruitful not to isolate the “as if“ personality
as a sharply demarcated syndrome, but to consider the “as if” state
as ranging along a spectrum, with the “as if” personality in pure
culture at one end, and numerous “as if” states with varying
degrees of pathology, “pseudo” states resembling the “as if” in the
middle, and “as if” phenomena in individuals who appear rela-
tively normal and well functioning at the other end. Perhaps we
can even speak of sublimations of the “as if” state, such as acting,
political activity, extreme conformity, etc. (This “spectrum” is
not meant to describe descending degrees of pathology.) It is gen-
erally agreed that the “as if” phenomenon is represented develop-
mentally at the two-three year level of imitativeness, and does not
represent true or secondary identification. Narcissism is extreme
and object choices, if they can truly be called such, are of the
narcissistic type. Affect is singularly poor and presumably reflects
the severe retardation of ego maturation, especially with respect to