Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Opinion Leader - An Overview - ScienceDirect Topics
Opinion Leader - An Overview - ScienceDirect Topics
Related terms:
Mobile Device, Social Networks, Intranets, Degree Centrality, Flow Model,
Cognitive Walkthroughs, Diffusion Process, Influence Model
2 Problem Definition
Opinion leaders are individuals who exert a significant amount of influence within
their network and who can affect the opinions of connected individuals. Opinion
leaders play an important role within the two-step flow of communication model,
where information is transferred from the mass media to the public in two steps:
first, from the media to opinion leaders and then from opinion leaders to the
larger audience [1]. The two-step flow is therefore relevant to the process of
influencing and changing people’s opinions [2]. According to Katz [1], the following
three factors impact the status of opinion leadership: (1) personification of certain
values, (2) personal competence, and (3) strategic social location. The status of
opinion leadership might change with time and different individuals may be
opinion leaders in different domains.
There are many domains in which information can be disseminated more
effectively when opinion leaders are targeted. For instance, in the medical field,
detecting opinion leaders has been used to raise awareness and promote new and
effective treatments [3], as in HIV prevention or child health promotion [4]. Climate
change awareness campaigns have also relied on opinion leaders to effectively
disseminate information [5]. Two such examples are campaigns led by Al Gore in
the mid-to-late years of the first decade of this century that involved selecting
opinion leaders to give presentations and inform the larger public on climate
change issues. Opinion leader identification is also of interest in advertising,
marketing, and product adoption [3], where companies are interested in attracting
potential clients to their products as effectively as possible. Political campaigns can
also benefit from identifying and targeting opinion leaders, as evidenced by the
2004 US presidential election campaign of George W. Bush, where opinion leaders
were selected to promote the campaign [5]. Knowing who the opinion leaders are
can yield benefits in a variety of domains, which makes their correct and efficient
identification a very important task.
Traditionally, sociological approaches rely on manual or explicit collection of leader
information via questionnaires or interviews [1]. A survey covering 191 articles in
the field of sociology found that the main strategies for leader identification are
distributed as follows: 19% use sociometric methods, 13% use self-selection, 12%
use positional approaches, 11.5% use judges’ ratings methods, and the rest do not
reveal the identification mechanism [6]. Such approaches possess several
drawbacks: On one hand, self-reported information is subjective by nature and
self-claimed influence is likely to be a reflection of self-confidence [3]. Having an
objective assessment of opinion leadership would lead to more reliable methods of
finding leaders. On the other hand, sociological studies are limited in scope by the
resources needed to undertake them; having scalable algorithms that can
accurately identify opinion leaders allows us to take advantage of the ever-growing
quantities of social data generated on the Internet. Thus methods that rely on
network science and data mining techniques to identify opinion leaders have been
developed, and such approaches are the focus of this chapter.
Influence: Social
Y. Ito, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001
2 Personal Influence
The ‘opinion leader’ mentioned above refers not only to professional opinion
makers such as journalists, critics, and university professors but to all men and
women who influence others around them on a daily basis, in some specific area,
such as local politics, fashion, sports, travel, medical care, or even cooking. These
opinion leaders are often asked for advice by people who look up to them. To meet
such expectations, they expose themselves to the mass media more extensively
than their followers. Opinion leaders compare and evaluate opinions and
information that is first presented by the mass media. As a result, the influence of
mass media first takes place among opinion leaders who in turn regurgitate their
latest batch of news to their followers in the form of guidance or advice. Even if a
person's opinion is shaped by the mass media, that opinion may be quickly
replaced by that of an opinion leader because such people's opinions are trusted
more by their followers than are those of the mass media. This process is called the
‘two step flow’ of social influence (Lazarsfeld et al. [1944] 1968).
Another explanation for this ‘personal influence’ is provided by the ‘cognitive
consistency theory.’ According to this theory, people are affected by those whom
they like because the cognition that one likes someone and the cognition that one's
opinion is different from theirs is psychologically inconsistent and therefore
uncomfortable. In such a case, it is predicted that people would change their
opinion of, or attitudes toward, the person in question (Festinger 1957, Heider
1958, Newcomb 1953).
5 Opinion Leaders
The two-step flow model of mass communication suggests that communication
messages flow from a source, via mass media channels, to opinion leaders, who in
turn pass them on to followers (Rogers 1995). This two-step flow model of mass
communication can be utilized to diffuse an innovation. The model focuses
attention on the inter-media interface between mass media channels and
interpersonal communication channels. Mass media channels are primarily
creators of awareness-knowledge of innovations, while interpersonal networks are
more important in persuading individuals to adopt or reject innovations.
The two-step flow model highlights the importance of opinion leaders in diffusing
innovations, and especially in reaching the critical mass. Opinion leaders
informally influence other individuals' attitudes or overt behavior in a desired way
with relative frequency, so they are critical to the successful diffusion of
innovations.
Read full chapter
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767030941
The concept of the ‘two-step flow of communication’ suggests that the flow of
information and influence from the mass media to their audiences involves two
steps: from the media to certain individuals (i.e., the opinion leaders) and from
them to the public. Since the introduction of the two-step flow model and the
opinion leadership concept, numerous studies have sought to advance both the
understanding and applicability of these ideas to various areas from marketing and
consumer behavior, to fashion, politics, and scientific innovations. However, the
concept has been a subject of growing criticism, leading to a decline in the
popularity and attraction of the original concept and almost to its total collapse.
Nevertheless, the paradigm's ‘fight for survival,’ through a dynamic exchange of
arguments, criticism, response, and debate, resulted in several modifications of the
original model.
Beyond liking
Heather J. Hether, Christopher Calabrese, in Technology and Health, 2020