Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experimental Analysis of Rotary Friction Joining Process by EN1A Bright Mild Steel Under Normal Air and Wet Environment Condition
Experimental Analysis of Rotary Friction Joining Process by EN1A Bright Mild Steel Under Normal Air and Wet Environment Condition
Experimental Analysis of Rotary Friction Joining Process by EN1A Bright Mild Steel Under Normal Air and Wet Environment Condition
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Rotary friction welding is a solid state metal joining process and it has many applications in future
Received 12 March 2021 upcoming days because of its advantages like without fumes and smokeless operation. In this process
Received in revised form 26 March 2021 heat generates through mechanical friction between one continuously rotating component and one sta-
Accepted 30 March 2021
tionary component. After heat generation phase an additional forging force is applied which completes
Available online xxxx
coalescence. Since no melting of material occurs during friction welding, but metal gets deform after heat
generation at welding zone. The main advantages of friction welding include low distortion, absence of
Keywords:
weld related defects, high joint strength, ease of automation, ability to weld alloys and metals which
Friction and Forging Force
Rpm
are not weldable by conventional welding methods. In this research work weld specimens were prepared
Temperature and Time on all geared lathe conventional machine by consideration of parameters like rpm of rotating specimen,
HAZ-heat affected zone friction and forging force applied. This study includes that joining of metal initially carried out under nor-
mal atmospheric conditions i.e. air environment and secondly, continuous stream of water under the wet
environment. The materials were used EN1A bright mild steel and only similar combinations were used
for study purpose. An experimental setup was prepared for force measurement on all geared lathe
machine. Mechanical properties of joints were evaluated utilizing tensile test and hardness at heat
affected zone.
Ó 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the 3rd International Conference on Futuristic Trends
in Materials and Manufacturing.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.690
2214-7853/Ó 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the 3rd International Conference on Futuristic Trends in Materials and Manufacturing.
Please cite this article as: V.V. Kulkarni and P.C. Kulkarni, Experimental analysis of rotary friction joining process by EN1A bright mild steel under normal
air and wet environment condition, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.690
V.V. Kulkarni and P.C. Kulkarni Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Table 1
Chemical composition in % of EN1A.
C Mn Si S P Cr Ni Fe
0.07 1.02 0.10 0.20 0.70 0.06 0.03 98.46
ling and machining operations are involved. It can be case- increased crack tendency, which all contribute to reduced joint
hardened, producing components with enhanced wear resistance. quality. The stream of water is supplied with help of coolant pump
Specimens to be welded were machined to rods of length 45 mm present with the lathe machine driven by a 3 phase, 0.15 HP AC
and Ø 12 mm. Since in this process impurities are brought to the motor rotating at 2880 rpm. Welding under stream of water is
surface due to plastic flow and centrifugal action, minimal surface important because it can be widely used in offshore application
preparation is required. The specimens are cut by abrasive cutter where traditional welding methods cannot be effectively used
and facing is done at the joining surface to ensure removal of Figs. 5a–6b.
HAZ formed due to the abrasive cutting action.Table 2.Table 3.
5. Tensile testing
4. Experimental setup The specimens were welded as per the experimental design
after which they were prepared for tensile testing by machining.
Experiment trails were carried out on conventional all gear The mechanical properties were assessed by tensile testing and
lathe machine of ‘NAGMATI’ make model 175 having an AC motor hardness testing. Tensile strength is represented as effectiveness
of 2H.P. and speed 1440 rpm. During initial trials, a number of of the join. This in turn is defined as the % of strength joint with
problems encountered were axial misalignment of components respect to that of parent material as reference Graph 1–3.
to be welded, excessive vibrations in the stationary specimen Ductility of material is assessed on basis of %elongation of the
and inability to measure force applied during the welding. tensile tested specimen. The initial gauge length and the final
Hence to minimize these problems the new experimental setup gauge length are noted and %elongation of specimen is calculated
was build which can be conveniently assembled on the machine. as follows.
Fig. 2a represents the weld joint formed during initial trial without
tensile strength of joint
use of the setup we observe considerable axial misalignment. In % Effectiv eness ¼ 100
Fig. 2b shows the better axial alignment were obtained with the tensile strength ofparent material
use of the modified setup assembled on the conventional lathe
machine while keeping the same parameters during trials Fig. 3. change in gauge length
% elongation ¼ 100
During the modification and designs of experimental setup on gauge length
conventional lathe machine the following factors were considered
during friction welding firstly, friction and forging pressure and
secondly, rpm of the rotating specimen. Since these factors play
an important role in determining the effectiveness of joint formed.
Another important variation induced was welding under nor-
mal air (atmospheric) environment condition and under the con-
tinuous running stream of water as shown in Figs. 4a & 4b. Since
the water plays a vital role during hardening of steel as well as heat Fig. 2a. Axial misalignment during initial trial run.
dissipation from the weld interface which reduces the heat
affected zone (HAZ) formed near the welding joint interface, it
was important to study effect of the same on the welding joint
properties. And the effect of water on the mechanical properties
of underwater welding joints. In comparison to normal air (atmo-
spheric) environment condition of welding and underwater envi-
ronment condition welding joint were results in the loss of
alloying elements from the welding position, increased porosity
formation at weld zone, the presence of slags in the welds,
increased oxygen and carbon content in the weld zone, and Fig. 2b. Axial alignment after assembly of the setup.
Table 2
Tensile Testing Result.
SAMPLE A1 A1 A1 A1 W1 W1 W1 W1
TENSILE STRENGTH(N/mm2) 525.911 489.876 559.539 521.938 615.692 509.835 584.531 631.195
EFFECTIVENESS(in %) 77.08 71.80 82.01 76.50 90.24 74.72 85.67 92.51
ELONGATION (in %) 4.73 3.29 6.20 12.21 2.77 2.71 6.80 16.85
Table 3
Rockwell Hardness Testing Results.
SAMPLE NAME A1 A2 A3 A4 W1 W2 W3 W4
Hardness at weld interface (HRA) 45.37 42.75 49.11 45.51 46.75 47.12 44.75 48.52
3
V.V. Kulkarni and P.C. Kulkarni Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Graph 1. Hardness.
Graph 2. Elongation.
Fig. 5a. Specimen after welding.
Hardness testing was carried out on Rockwell hardness testing 4.5 mm from the axis of the specimen. The values of %effectiveness,
machine using Rockwell A (HRA) Scale using load of 60 kgf at the hardness and elongation of the welded specimens are plotted on in
heat affected zone near the weld interface at a distance of order to study their variation with change in factors.
4
V.V. Kulkarni and P.C. Kulkarni Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Table 4
Results of different experimental trials conducted.
SAMPLE SPEED TIME FRICTION PRESSURE FORGING PRESSURE TENSILE STRENGTH EFFECTIVENESS ELONG. Hardness at weld
NAME (RPM) (s) (kg/cm2) (kg/cm2) (N/mm2) (In %) (In %) interface(HRA)
A1 1500 65 30 60 525.911 77.08 4.73 45.37
A2 975 56 30 60 489.876 71.80 3.29 42.75
A3 1500 116 25 50 559.539 82.01 6.20 49.11
A4 975 85 25 50 521.938 76.50 12.21 45.51
W1 1500 160 30 60 615.692 90.24 2.77 46.75
W2 975 92 30 60 509.835 74.72 2.71 47.12
W3 1500 97 25 50 584.531 85.67 6.80 44.75
W4 975 81 25 50 631.195 92.51 16.85 48.52
7. Result and discussion environment conditions. Highest joint strength achieved on welds
performed on EN1A is 631.195 N/mm2 at a rotational speed of 975
The mechanical properties of the joints are assessed by tensile RPM friction pressure of 25 kg/cm2 and forging pressure of 50 kg/
testing and hardness testing of the specimens. The results of same cm2 with weld time of 81 s welded under wet condition and elon-
are represented in table 4. In order to ensure that errors induced gation of 16.85% (refer table 4). Hardness of the weld interface var-
due to machine are not encountered tensile testing of parent mate- ied only marginally due to presence of low percentage of carbon
rial and the welded specimens were carried out on the same present in parent material. The hardness of material at weld inter-
machine with similar input parameters. The HAZ observed in case face is higher in case of joints welded under wet condition (aver-
of welds made during normal atmospheric conditions in signifi- age = 46.78 HRA) than that welded under normal atmospheric
cantly larger than that made under running stream of water. conditions (avg. = 45.56 HRA). However, one exception to this
It is observed that tensile strength of specimen welded under statement is noted when hardness of specimen welded using
water is higher than that welded under normal atmospheric condi- 1500 rpm, 25 kg/cm2 friction pressure and normal atmospheric
tions when other parameters are held constant. It is also observed condition (49.11 HRA) is higher than the specimen welded under
that ductility of joints measured as elongation of specimen welded same parameters but using wet condition (44.75 HRA). Ductility
under friction pressure of 25 kg/cm2 and forging pressure of 50 kg/ of material as assessed by % elongation of material is also retained
cm2 and rotation speed of 975 rpm, irrespective of welding envi- to a greater extent in the joints formed. (As observed from table 4).
ronment is higher than that of parent material. The maximum
effectiveness and tensile strength of joint achieved is 92.51% and
CRediT authorship contribution statement
631.195 N/mm2 respectively. The %elongation of the specimen
been noted as 16.85%. This joint is obtained at 975 rpm and friction
Vaibhav V. Kulkarni: Investigation, Writing - original draft.
pressure of 25 kg/cm2 and forging pressure of 50 kg/cm2 and weld-
Prafulla C. Kulkarni: Conceptualization, Writing - review & edit-
ing under continuous running stream of water.
ing, Supervision.
8. Future scope
Declaration of Competing Interest
The researcher have many scope for doing experimental study
and parametrical analysis of rotary friction welding process with The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-
different types of similar and dissimilar metals. And to focuses cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared
on Rotary Friction Welding manufacturers companies and study to influence the work reported in this paper.
the capacity, production, value, market share and development
plans in coming years. RFW process can be analyze, the process Acknowledgement
simulation by using different suitable software i.e. Matlab, Ansys,
Abacus. Also RFW process mathematical modelling as well as pro- I would like to express special thanks of gratitude to my
cess parameter optimization can be carried out using different research guide for his valuable guidance and motivation. He was
research methodology. To find out the various applications of a source of inspiration and very helpful throughout the work. I
RFW process in automobile and oil and refinery, shipbuilding am very grateful to our Principal and Head of the department from
industry. Also research can be done on bimetal material and their MITCOE and as well as the research center staff for their encour-
process parameter and optimize the same. Microstructural analysis agement and valuable suggestions during the carried out review
and mechanical properties of the bimetal material research can be and experimental work. I am very much thankful to our machine
carried out. shop staff from workshop department MITCOE for their support
and cooperation.
9. Conclusion
References
This research study investigates the variation of mechanical
properties of joints formed using rotary friction welding under nor- [1] Shubhavardhan R.N & Surendran S.‘‘Friction Welding to Join Dissimilar
mal air (atmospheric) environment condition and wet environ- Metals”, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced
Engineering (IJTAE), Vol.2, Issue 3 Sep 2012.53-73.
ment condition by using various parameters. Following
[2] Rajendran M. & Mathi. K. ‘‘Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Behavior
conclusions were drawn from the experimental setup trails: Fric- of Friction Welded Al 7075”, IEEE-International Conference on Advances in
tion welding can be effectively carried out on conventional lathe Engineering, Science and Management (ICAESM). (2012).
machine using suitable modification. Strength of welded joints [3] S. T. Selvamani, K. Vigneswar, K. Harikumaran, S. Premkumar, ‘‘Sensitivity
Analysis of Friction Welded AISI52100 Grade Carbon Steel Rods”, IEEE-32331,
under a continuous stream of water environment has been found International Conference on Science, Engineering and Management Research
higher than that of welded joints under normal air (atmospheric) (ICSEMR), 978 – 1- 4799-7613-3/ 14-2014 IEEE. (2014),
5
V.V. Kulkarni and P.C. Kulkarni Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
[4] P.Sathiya , S.Aravindan , A.Noorul Haq, ‘‘Mechanical and metallurgical alloy to AZ31 magnesium alloy”, Journal of alloy and compounds, S0925-8388
properties of friction welded AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel”, Int. J. Adv. (16)33697-0-(2016).
Manuf. Tech., 26, pp. 505–511. [11] M. Kimura, K. Suzuki, M. Kusaka, Kaizu K, ‘‘Effect of friction welding condition
[5] G. Sardana, Friction Welding on Lathe Machine with special Fixture, on joining phenomenon and mechanical properties of friction welded joint
International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology (IJIET) 2 between 6063 aluminium alloy and AISI 304 stainless steel”, Journal of
(3) (2013) 258–261. Manufacturing Processes (2017).
[6] Mr.Tijo Jose, Mr. VInoj K (2016), ‘‘Friction Welding of Aluminium 6061 and [12] R. Palanivel, R. F. Laubscher, I. Dinaharan, ‘‘An investigation into the effect of
Aluminium 6082 Rods by Using Conventional Lathe”, International Journal of friction welding parameters on tensile strength of titanium tubes by utilizing
Current Trends in Engineering & Research (IJCTER), Vol.2, Issue 4, April 2016, an empirical relationship, Measurement”, S0263-2241 (16) 30680-7 (2016).
page 170-175. [13] Nirmal S. Kalsi, Vishal S. Sharma, A statistical analysis of rotary friction
[7] Amit Handa & Vikas Chawala, ‘‘Experimental Study of Mechanical Properties of welding of steel with varying carbon in workpieces, IJAMT 2011 (57) (2011)
Friction Welded AISI 1021 Steel”, Sadhana, Vol. 38, Part 6, Dec 2013, page 957–967, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3361-z, Published online: 12
1407-1419.(2013). May.
[8] Rama Rao,‘‘Design and Fabrication of Rotary Friction Welding On Lathe [14] Nisarg Shete and S.U.Deokar, ‘‘A Review Paper on Rotary Friction Welding”,
Machine”, International journal of Engineering Research and Application International Conference on Ideas, Impact and Innovation in Mechanical
(IJERA), (Jan 2015). Engineering (ICIIIME 2017), ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 5 Issue: 6, 1557-1560.
[9] P. A. Thakare & Lt. Randheer Singh, ‘‘Design and development of micro friction [15] Suppachai Chainarong, Chaiyoot Meengam, and Muhamad Tehyo, ‘‘Rotary
Welding Machine and Investigation of Welding Parameters of Similar Friction Welding of Dissimilar Joints between SSM356 and SSM6061
Material”International Journal of Scientific and Engg. Research, Vol. 5, Issue Aluminium Alloys Produced by GISS”, Engg. Journal Vol. 21, Issue 1,
6, June 2014, pp 1379-1384. (2014). Published 31 January 2017, 10.4186/ej.2017.21.1.181.
[10] Wei Guo, Guoqiang You, Guangyu Yuan, Xiuli Zhang. ‘‘Microstructure and
mechanical properties of dissimilar inertia friction welding of 7A04 aluminium