Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

V olume 3 N o .

1 JANUARY 2012 • pages 7-13 M alaysian J ournal of V eterinary R esearch

A BEEF FATTENING DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM


SHANMUGAVELU S.1, WAN ZAHARI M. 2 , WONG H.K.1 AND MARDHATI M.1
1 Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, MARDI, Serdang, Selangor.
2 Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Pengkalan Chepa, Kota Bharu, Kelantan. shan@mardi.gov.my

ABSTRACT. A beef feedlot production INTRODUCTION


decision support system (DSS) was
developed based on Microsoft® Excel. Beef is an important commodity in
The DSS comprises of three modules i) an Malaysia with a per-capita consumption
ingredient database ii) a least-cost ration of 5.6 kg. However, only 28% of this
formulation module and iii) beef growth requirement is produced locally (DVS,
simulation module. The program uses 2010). The main factor that contributes
empirical equations developed for tropical to the low self sufficiency level is the
beef to simulate nutrient requirements high cost of local beef production. For
and daily body weight gains based on the example, the average cost of local beef for
formulated feed ration. The formulated 2010 was RM15.85 compared to RM9.20
least cost ration can be pasted automatically for imported beef from India (DVS,
into the growth model to evaluate 2010). The lack of cheap feed and the
performance and economic viability. The inefficient use of available feed resources
growth model calculates nutrient available contribute significantly to the higher cost
and computes body weight gain on a daily of production as feed generally comprises
basis, summates weight gain and stops 60-70% to the total production cost. Many
at the targeted body weight. The data local beef producers do not have access to
output include i) days to reach target body information on nutrient values of available
weight, ii) cumulative feed consumed, iii) feed resources nor the ability to efficiently
anticipated average daily gain, iv) total utilise the resources. This paper describes
cost of feed (concentrates and grass), and a beef fattening decision support system
v) gross profit per cattle. If a portion of that can help improve the efficiency of a
the feed is fed as grass, then the model beef production enterprise.
also computes the pasture land required
in hectares, based on the forage species MATERIALS & METHODS
chosen. It is anticipated that the developed
model can assist cattle entrepreneurs and A Microsoft® Excel based software was
farmers in the development of the beef developed based on cited publications
cattle industry in Malaysia. (NRC, 2000; Leonard, 1982) and beef
growth data collected from research
conducted in MARDI. The model comprises

7
M alaysian J ournal of V eterinary R esearch V olume 3 N o . 1 JANUARY 2012

Least
Feed
Cost
Database
Module

Simulation module

Cattle Cattle
Select Initial Target No. of
Purchase Sale
Feed Body wt Body wt Cattle
(RM/kg) (RM/kg)

Model
Inputs

If Body Weight <


Target Weight
Analyze Body
Weight
If Body Weight =
Target Weight

Output

1. Total feed cost (grass + concentrate)


2. Monthly gross profit & profit/cattle
3. Grass land required
4. Average daily gain (kg)
5. Dry matter intake

Figure 1. Model algorithm

of three modules i) an ingredient database based on research data to simulate


ii) a least-cost ration formulation module nutrient requirements and daily body
and iii) beef growth simulation module. weight gains. The nutrient requirements
The ingredient data base comprises of for the beef production module are based
nutrient content information of local feed on Department of Standards Malaysia
resources. The least cost module utilizes (Standards Malaysia) (unpublished).
the linear optimization module inbuilt in Microsoft® Excel 2007 Visual Basic for
Microsoft® Excel 2007 for Windows. The Application was employed for the beef
beef growth simulation uses empirical daily growth simulation module. The
equations developed for tropical beef program algorithm is shown in Figure 1.

8
V olume 3 N o . 1 JANUARY 2012 M alaysian J ournal of V eterinary R esearch

Other features incorporated into the model RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


include the options to evaluate two different
feed formulations and their growth rate The captions of the beef fattening decision
predictions. support system are shown in Figures 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 with simple user friendly

Figure 2. Main Screen

Figure 3. Growth simulation module

9
M alaysian J ournal of V eterinary R esearch V olume 3 N o . 1 JANUARY 2012

modules. The model enables the user to two types of formulations (Figure 5). The
alter feed ingredients and test different feed user has the option to alter, add and make
combinations based on costs and nutrient changes to the feed ingredient database
requirements and allows the comparison of including the use of grass as a proportion

Figure 4. Ingredient database

Figure 5. Least cost formulation module

10
V olume 3 N o . 1 JANUARY 2012 M alaysian J ournal of V eterinary R esearch

of the diet. If grass is chosen as an option, beef fattening decision support system was
the model computes the land required to verified against actual beef cattle growth
cultivate the grass species chosen. The from studies conducted in MARDI.

Figure 6. Least cost comparison module

Figure 7. Model evaluation module

11
M alaysian J ournal of V eterinary R esearch V olume 3 N o . 1 JANUARY 2012

Figure 8. Model analysis and economic evaluation module

220

210
Actual
200 Predicted
Body weight (kg)

190

180

170

160

150

140
0 14 28 42 56 70 84 98 112
Age (days)

Figure 9. Actual vs Predicted body weight

12
V olume 3 N o . 1 JANUARY 2012 M alaysian J ournal of V eterinary R esearch

A sample data of predicted against DSS software can be utilised to optimise


actual growth rate based on the feed returns. The model can be used by feedlot
formulated is shown in Figure 9 with an operators, beef nutritionists, and also in
average prediction error of 0.8 kg. The universities as a teaching tool. However,
model developed can be used by the it is emphasised that as with most DSS
beef feedlot industry to make intelligent systems, there can be variations in any
decisions and avoid losses in feedlot biological system. Nevertheless this
operations. It can also be used by extension software can be used as an intelligent tool
agents and as a teaching tool especially in to assess feedlot operations and improve
universities. economic returns.

CONCLUSION REFERENCES

1. DVS (2010). Online Livestock Statistics. Department of


A beef feedlot production decision Veterinary Services, Malaysia. http://www.dvs.gov.my/
support system (DSS) developed based on web/guest/perangkaan. Accessed 23 May 2011.
2. NRC (2000) Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle.
Microsoft® Excel was observed to predict Seventh Revised Edition 1996. National Academy Press,
beef growth under Malaysian conditions Washington, DC, USA.
3. Leonard C.K. (1982). Nutrient Requirements of ruminants
within reasonable limits. Beef feedlot is in developing countries. International Feedstuffs
a challenging enterprise especially with Institute, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
the high cost of feed ingredients and this

13

You might also like