1.

Sugar is worse than fat

Speaker 2 GOV
I agree that sugar is worse than fat. Aside from energy (calories), sugar provides no
nutrition which is why it is often referred to as ’empty calories’.
It also increases blood glucose levels quickly, which is one of the reasons why people
with diabetes are advised to limit their daily intake of sugar (the NHS recommends
consuming less than 70g a day of sugar for men and under 50g of sugar a day for
women).
In some diabetes cases, the effect of high blood sugar could lead to infection to open
wounds, depression, lost of senses, and worst it could lead to heart attack, stroke, and
even death.
In a 2012 harvard study, it has been shown that Roughly around 85% of people who were
suffering from  type 2 diabetes also endure obessity. Only about 14% are not obese. In
which the mortality rate is around 1-8% of 100 patients.

Speaker 2 OPP
I disagree with the motion. For decades, fat has been labelled the ‘bad guy’ in diet and
nutrition. However in recent years, a number of research studies have shown that fat is
no worse for us than carbohydrate. In fact, diets that are low in carbohydrate and high in
fat are now widely regarded as being healthier,  particularly in terms of blood glucose
control and weight loss, than low fat, higher carb diet plans.

Unlike sugar, fat has little immediate effect on blood glucose levels and this a key
reason why low carb, higher fat diets tend to produce better blood glucose control.
2. One person can make a real difference
Speaker 2 GOV
I agree with the motion. of course one person can make a real change. From the
moment we each wake up in the morning to the time we go to bed, we have the
opportunity to affect countless lives – family, friends, colleagues, strangers in the street
and people right across the world. We can do it simply by showing up as our best selves.
We can't possibly know the full positive impact we can have on those around us and on
the planet. But if we simply do what we can do today, the fingerprints and footprints we
leave in the world can take on a momentum of their own.

Everything we do makes a difference one way or another, positive or negative. One thing
always leads to another, and the ripple effect of every action changes the future.
As an example in the case of bullying, it must have been done by one prankster who kept
mocking his friends every day. As a result of this, his other friends also mocked. from
what was once only one person, can be 20 people. So what happened to the victim?
Surely there is one more person who can defend the victim. therefore every action taken
by one person can certainly make a huge impact on others, both in positive and negative
terms.

One example that we can studyv from would be USAIN BOLT in his c

Speaker 2 OPP
I disagree that one person can make a real difference. this motion can apply to
important people, such as the president, high-ranking officials, etc. because as we know
that they are the ones who make the state regulations and certainly their voices will be
heard by many people and their actions will greatly affect our lives.

But even though, the president can’t speak for himself, he has a line of staff or ministers
to consider his/her actions. So by that definition, one cannot make a chance by their self
rather not a conclusion from a discussion of many people

then what about us who are just ordinary people? Whom our voices are not heard
because they are considered trivial. not to mention when there is a difference of opinion.
when we want to do something that we think is good and with the initial goal we want to
bring change, not necessarily that person thinks the same thing. In the end what
happens is an argument and can lead to differences opinion.
First off all my rebuttal of the gov team would be as what you have said before a person
that can make a chance must have a valuable background. So no person without any
experincese even backup of of a team is abvle p make a different byt their self

all the example that you have shown are people

3. Money doesn’t bring you happiness

Speaker 2 GOV
I agree that money doesn’t bring you happiness because money has it’s limit.
There is no clear, linear relationship between happiness and wealth. For those living at
the poverty level, getting enough money to meet the fundamental needs will certainly
help. But beyond that, wealth actually gives very little long-term satisfaction. In fact, its
effect on happiness decreases over time. We get used to it—our purchases no longer
bring the same joy as before.  We will feel the need to buy more and better stuff to meet
both our own higher expectations and those of others. We seek more satisfaction in the
next purchase. It’s an unfortunate and endless cycle.

the other case is status. if we have a lot of money, of course we have a social status that
people know, but unfortunately it also does not bring happiness. Being recognised and
admired by others might trigger some joy. However, just as money has endless cycle, the
status-seeking path is also without an end. After climbing through the ranks, we see the
next level above, with even more prestige. It’s another unfortunate and endless cycle.