The document discusses three models for setting international financial reporting standards (IFRS):
1) A purely political approach where standards are decreed by national governments.
2) A private professional approach where standards are set and enforced solely by private professional bodies.
3) A public/private mixed approach where private sector bodies set standards similarly to public agencies and standards are largely enforced by governments.
It asks which model best describes current international standard setting and why various groups are actively involved in the standard setting process. It also discusses how government intervention in accounting rules could adversely affect capital markets.
The document discusses three models for setting international financial reporting standards (IFRS):
1) A purely political approach where standards are decreed by national governments.
2) A private professional approach where standards are set and enforced solely by private professional bodies.
3) A public/private mixed approach where private sector bodies set standards similarly to public agencies and standards are largely enforced by governments.
It asks which model best describes current international standard setting and why various groups are actively involved in the standard setting process. It also discusses how government intervention in accounting rules could adversely affect capital markets.
The document discusses three models for setting international financial reporting standards (IFRS):
1) A purely political approach where standards are decreed by national governments.
2) A private professional approach where standards are set and enforced solely by private professional bodies.
3) A public/private mixed approach where private sector bodies set standards similarly to public agencies and standards are largely enforced by governments.
It asks which model best describes current international standard setting and why various groups are actively involved in the standard setting process. It also discusses how government intervention in accounting rules could adversely affect capital markets.
What arguments can be raised to support the “politicization” of
accounting rule-making? b. What arguments can be raised against the “politicization” of accounting rule-making? CA1.9 (LO3) (Models for Setting IFRS) Presented below are three models for setting IFRS. 1. The purely political approach, where national legislative action decrees IFRS. 2. The private, professional approach, where IFRS is set and enforced by private professional actions only. 3. The public/private mixed approach, where IFRS is basically set by private-sector bodies that behave as though they were public agencies and whose standards to a great extent are enforced through governmental agencies. Instructions
a. Which of these three models best describes international
standard-setting? Comment on your answer. b. Why do companies, financial analysts, labor unions, industry trade associations, and others take such an active interest in standard-setting? CA1.10 (LO4) (Economic Consequences) Several years ago, then French President Nicolas Sarkozy urged his European Union counterparts to put pressure on the IASB to change accounting rules to give banks and insurers some relief from fair value accounting rules amid market turmoil. Mr. Sarkozy sought changes to the mark- to-market accounting rules that have been blamed for aggravating the crisis. Instructions
Explain how government intervention could possibly affect capital
What Specific Problems and Needs Do The Service Industry, The Standardization Bodies and Active Organisations Face in The Standardization of Services in The US?