Group Effectiveness Questionnaire—Ling 305W Project 3 Your Name: Nick Chanturia

Please rate each member in your group, including yourself, in terms of their value to the team effort (see scale below).
Please, complete the “Additional comments section as well. It’s mandatory

Insert group member names in the top box; then insert scores below.
Effectiveness Categories ME Nikoloz Pruidze Zurab Jeladze Alexander Temuka
Kakauridze Lomsadze

Came to each group meeting or posted messages to group 5 5 5 5 5

at agreed upon times.
Made an effort to provide input to the group regarding 5 4 4 4 4
problem solving.
Listened respectfully to others’ ideas and collaborated 5 5 5 5 5
well with others in the group.
Made an effort to ensure that every group member could 5 5 5 5 4
participate in the group.
Put thorough effort into his or her sections of the 5 5 4 4 5
proposal.
Submitted his or her portion of the proposal at the agreed 5 5 5 5 4
upon time.
Rate your willingness to work with this person again, 10 5 5 4 4
should the occasion ever arise.

Scores: 5 = outstanding; 4 = very good; 3 = satisfactory; 2 = not very helpful; 1 = not helpful at all

Since we had to work on the project 5 fully online, we’ve encountered many little issues, such as mismatching in timing, having technical
difficulties, etc. Besides, our group membership was pretty unstable. However, we’ve all tried our best to complete the project as successfully
as we could. Personally, I’m really satisfied with our work to be honest but I guess, that’s why we do such projects, to learn from it and not
make the same mistakes again in the future. The biggest problem for us as a group was to distribution of responsibility.