A.

Complaints Submitted by Suppliers Against Procuring Entities

Budget Public Body given notice the procuring case not reviewed case closed because: case closed total
year to: entity did not because: • of absence of sufficient because the
• change its decision, commit the • the procuring evidence public body
• take corrective offence entity is not a and the
measures, federal public body • it was submitted after the supplier
• that the procurement (The procurement stipulated time came to
proceeding is against proceeding is not • procurement agreement
the law against the law) performed by World
• cancel the bid Bank procedures • it was submitted prior to
(in favors of the supplier) the submission to the
public body
- 2 - 1 - 3
2004/2005

2 6 - 3 - 11
2005/2006

2 1 8 - - 11
2006/2007

4 3 1 - 1 9
2007/2008

9 3 - 5 - 17
2008/2009

3 2 - 4 - 9
2009/2010

Total 20 17 9 13 1 60
 B. Complaints submitted by Procuring Entities against Suppliers (2005-2009)
Budget Year supplier warning Cancellation of case closed case case being case not total
declared not given to supplier from because the closed reviewed examined cases
committing supplier for suppliers’ public body because of because the entertained
offence committing list for and the absence of procuring entity
offence committing supplier sufficient is not a federal
offence came to evidence public body
agreement
- 1 2 5 4 - - 12
2004/2005

1 5 1 1 13 - 1 22
2005/2006

2 9 3 1 1 - - 16
2006/2007

1 2 - 2 6 - - 11
2007/2008

4 18 2 1 28 - - 53
2008/2009

4 11 - 2 1 24 42
2009/2010

Total 12 46 8 12 53 24 1 156

Note: There are 4 cases on public bodies under investigation submitted to the Agency from the Ethics and Anti –

Corruption Commission.