Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Leiomioma - Miomectomia Abdominal
Leiomioma - Miomectomia Abdominal
www.uptodate.com
© 2021 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Jul 2021. | This topic last updated: Jul 15, 2021.
INTRODUCTION
Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas or myomas) are the most common type of pelvic tumor in women,
with an approximate 70 to 80 percent lifetime risk [1-3]. There are many management options
for fibroid-related symptoms, including expectant management, medical therapy, nonexcisional
procedures (endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, magnetic resonance guided
focused ultrasound), and surgery (myomectomy, radiofrequency ablation, hysterectomy).
Open abdominal myomectomy (performed via laparotomy) was developed in the early 1900s as
a conservative treatment for patients with uterine myomas. Myomectomy is the surgical
removal of leiomyomas from the uterus, leaving the uterus in place. This can be accomplished
using an abdominal, laparoscopic, hysteroscopic, or vaginal approach.
Open abdominal myomectomy will be reviewed here. General principles of the treatment of
uterine leiomyomas, as well as laparoscopic, hysteroscopic, and vaginal myomectomy and
techniques to reduce blood loss during myomectomy, are discussed separately. (See "Uterine
fibroids (leiomyomas): Treatment overview" and "Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas): Laparoscopic
myomectomy and other laparoscopic treatments" and "Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas):
Hysteroscopic myomectomy" and "Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas): Prolapsed fibroids" and
"Techniques to reduce blood loss during abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy".)
PATIENT SELECTION
Open abdominal myomectomy is performed mostly for patients with intramural or subserosal
leiomyomas ( figure 1). Intracavitary myomas (submucosal and some intramural myomas
that protrude into the endometrial cavity) ( figure 2) may also be removed during open
abdominal myomectomy. However, hysteroscopic myomectomy is the procedure of choice
when only small (<5 cm) intracavitary myomas are removed since it offers the advantages of a
faster recovery and less perioperative morbidity. (See "Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas):
Hysteroscopic myomectomy", section on 'Patient selection'.)
Appropriate candidates for open abdominal myomectomy are patients with the following
characteristics:
There is no evidence that pelvic examination increases early detection or decreases the
mortality related to ovarian cancer [5]. For patients in whom a leiomyomatous uterus makes it
difficult to evaluate the adnexa, pelvic imaging should be performed only if symptoms of
adnexal disease develop (eg, lower quadrant pelvic pain) or for selected patients who require
screening for ovarian cancer. If sonographic visualization of the ovaries is occluded by myomas,
magnetic resonance imaging should be performed. (See "The gynecologic history and pelvic
examination", section on 'Timing issues' and "Approach to the patient with an adnexal mass",
section on 'Role of additional imaging'.)
Likewise, exclusion of uterine sarcoma is not an indication for myomectomy. Uterine sarcoma is
rare and the likelihood of finding sarcoma in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of
leiomyomas is much lower than the risk of severe complications associated with surgery for
benign disease. (See "Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas): Differentiating fibroids from uterine
sarcomas", section on 'Should hysterectomy be performed to exclude uterine sarcoma?'.)
Infertility — The location of a fibroid, and not its size, is the key factor regarding impact on
fertility [6]. Leiomyomas that distort the uterine cavity (submucosal or intramural with an
intracavitary component) result in difficulty conceiving a pregnancy and an increased risk of
miscarriage [6,7].
By contrast, a systematic review of mostly observational studies found that infertility is not
associated with subserosal fibroids and that the role of intramural fibroids is controversial [6,7].
Since open abdominal myomectomy is performed mainly to remove intramural or subserosal
myomas, its role in patients with infertility is uncertain. (See "Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas):
Treatment overview", section on 'Impact of fibroids on fertility'.)
The choice of treatment for patients with uterine leiomyomas is guided by the type of
symptoms in the individual patient.
The choice of a therapy for chronic abnormal uterine bleeding is discussed separately. (See
"Abnormal uterine bleeding: Management in premenopausal patients", section on 'Choosing a
treatment'.)
The choice of treatment for bulk-related symptoms depends on the patient's desire for future
fertility and/or uterine conservation and the patient's preferences regarding definitive
treatment and the invasiveness of treatment. Size and location of myomas and access to
clinicians with expertise in minimally invasive procedures are also important factors in this
decision.
Choosing between myomectomy and other treatments is discussed in this section; comparisons
among other treatments are discussed separately. (See "Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas):
Treatment overview".)
Interventional radiology procedures may not be appropriate for patients planning future
pregnancy because of potential safety issues and detrimental effects on ovarian function. As
examples, uterine artery embolization may have a negative effect on fertility and obstetric
outcomes, and the safety of pregnancy following magnetic resonance guided focused
ultrasound has not been established. (See "Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas): Treatment with
uterine artery embolization" and "Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas): Treatment overview", section
on 'Third tier'.)
Eligibility for these procedures is limited by fibroid size and location. In addition, some patients
may not have easy access to physicians who have experience with these procedures. (See
"Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas): Laparoscopic myomectomy and other laparoscopic treatments",
section on 'Candidates for laparoscopic myomectomy' and "Laparoscopic hysterectomy" and
"Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas): Treatment with uterine artery embolization".)
● Abdominal incisions are not required, which reduces postoperative discomfort and
improves cosmesis.
In addition, the recovery time from interventional radiology procedures is typically two weeks
or less. This is similar to laparoscopic myomectomy but much shorter than open abdominal
myomectomy, which generally requires four to six weeks for recuperation.
Uterine artery embolization has been compared with open or laparoscopic myomectomy in
only one randomized trial (n = 121) [8]. There was no difference between groups in the rate of
symptomatic relief after six months (89 versus 88 percent). This overall outcome does not
specifically address treatment of bulk-related symptoms, since the results for bleeding, pain,
and pressure symptoms were combined. Patients who underwent uterine artery embolization
compared with myomectomy had higher rates of complications (21 versus 16 percent) and of
prolonged hospital stay (16 versus 10 percent), but these differences did not reach statistical
significance. The reintervention rate after an average of two years was significantly higher for
uterine artery embolization (33 versus 3 percent); reintervention was myomectomy in this
study. Of note, however, the indication for most reinterventions in this study was the size of
fibroids, not recurrence of symptoms. A similar difference in the reintervention rate was
reported in a retrospective cohort study that compared uterine artery embolization with
myomectomy (29 versus 3 percent at four years; interventions were myomectomy or repeat
embolization) [9].
Over the long-term, however, myomectomy also has a high rate of intervention. Studies with up
to 7 to 10 years of follow-up report subsequent surgery for fibroid-related symptoms in 10 to 26
percent of patients following myomectomy [10-12]. For embolization, studies with five or more
years of follow-up have reported that 20 percent of patients undergo subsequent surgery. High-
quality and long-term data are needed to address the comparative risk of reintervention for
these two procedures. (See 'Subsequent treatment' below.)
Magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound is not widely available and has not been
evaluated in comparison with myomectomy.
In summary, uterine artery embolization and laparoscopic myomectomy are both minimally
invasive approaches. Based upon available data, the risk of reintervention appears to be higher
for uterine artery embolization, at least in the first several years after the procedure. As a result,
we suggest laparoscopic myomectomy rather than embolization. Patients who place a high
priority on avoiding any abdominal incisions may reasonably choose embolization. Some
patients are not candidates for laparoscopic myomectomy. For these patients, the advantages
of a minimally invasive procedure outweigh the risk of reintervention. The clinician should
counsel the patient about all options and choose the procedure based upon patient preference.
Prevention of future cervical or uterine pathology is not a relevant indication for hysterectomy
in current practice. Advances in cervical cancer screening and diagnosis and treatment of
abnormal uterine bleeding have provided less invasive options.
In addition, myomectomy does not appear to have a higher risk of blood loss or complications
than hysterectomy, according to observational data [14,15]. The largest report was a
retrospective study of 394 patients with leiomyomatous uteri who underwent either open
abdominal myomectomy or hysterectomy [14]. Estimated blood loss (227 versus 484 mL) and
the rate of hemorrhage, defined as ≥500 mL blood loss (10 versus 14 percent), were
significantly lower in the myomectomy group. The overall morbidity rate, adjusted for age,
weight, and uterine size, was comparable in the two groups. A meta-analysis found similar
results [16].
The decision between myomectomy and hysterectomy must be individualized. The least
invasive procedure should be chosen. Patients should be counseled regarding the procedures
for which they are eligible. This will depend primarily on the size, number, and location of
fibroids. Based upon these factors, some patients are candidates only for laparotomy.
For patients who are eligible for all procedures, no studies have directly compared outcomes
for the various minimally invasive approaches (laparoscopic myomectomy, with either vaginal
or laparoscopic hysterectomy). Some factors that may affect a patient's decision include:
● Some patients prefer myomectomy because they wish to conserve their uterus.
● Studies show a higher risk of injury to ureters, bladder and bowel with hysterectomy
[14,15].
In some patients, hysterectomy may be associated with subsequent pelvic organ prolapse.
Consistent results from large observational studies show patients who undergo a hysterectomy
are at risk of having subsequent prolapse repair surgery. However, this risk may be limited to
patients for whom prolapse was the indication for undergoing hysterectomy. It is not certain
whether undergoing a hysterectomy for fibroids is a risk factor for developing symptomatic
prolapse. Also, many patients have several risk factors for prolapse, including parity, advancing
age, and obesity. (See "Choosing a route of hysterectomy for benign uterine disease".)
In general, for subserosal or intramural fibroids, there are more minimally invasive options for
hysterectomy than myomectomy. More patients are candidates for vaginal and laparoscopic
hysterectomy than laparoscopic myomectomy, and more surgeons have the skills for less
invasive approaches to hysterectomy.
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION
The medical history should include questions regarding a personal or family history of bleeding
disorders, as well as other medical comorbidities that may impact the ability to tolerate surgery.
(See "Preoperative medical evaluation of the healthy adult patient".)
Imaging — Patients who are planning myomectomy should undergo imaging to confirm the
presence of uterine leiomyomas rather than other pelvic pathology. In addition, incidental
findings of other lesions (eg, ovarian cyst) may impact surgical planning.
Imaging with ultrasonography rather than other modalities is sufficient for patients in whom
open myomectomy is planned. Ultrasound can confirm the presence of leiomyomas and their
approximate number and location [18].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is typically not necessary prior to open myomectomy, with
the exception of patients in whom leiomyomas must be differentiated from uterine sarcoma or
adenomyosis. (See "Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas): Differentiating fibroids from uterine
sarcomas", section on 'Imaging' and "Uterine adenomyosis", section on 'Diagnosis'.)
MRI is not required to evaluate the anatomic relationship between fibroids and the ureters.
Fibroids do not engulf the ureters; as they grow, they push the ureters and vessels away. If the
surgeon stays inside the fibroid pseudocapsule, the ureters will always be outside the
pseudocapsule. The only exception is intravenous leiomyomatosis, in which the blood supply of
the uterus near the ureters can be involved. We dissect out the ureters when necessary, but this
is rarely the case. (See "Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas): Variants and smooth muscle tumors of
uncertain malignant potential", section on 'Intravenous leiomyomatosis'.)
We also send a blood sample to the blood bank in case there is a need for transfusion.
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION
Preparing for potential blood loss — Myomectomy may result in significant blood loss.
Myomectomy does not usually result in significant blood loss, but risk factors for increased
blood loss include large or multiple fibroids. For patients with an increased risk of significant
blood loss, preoperative measures such as correction of anemia or autologous blood donation
may reduce the likelihood of receiving a blood transfusion.
A detailed discussion of measures to reduce blood loss associated with myomectomy can be
found separately. (See "Techniques to reduce blood loss during abdominal or laparoscopic
myomectomy".)
Myomectomy can usually be performed using a Pfannenstiel incision, or if slightly more access
is needed, a Maylard incision. Compared with a large vertical incision (eg, to the umbilicus or
above), these incisions decrease postoperative pain and improve scar cosmesis [20]. For large
uterine size, making the transverse incision slightly higher than usual, extending the incision to
the lateral borders of the rectus muscles and then curving it cephalad to avoid the ilioinguinal
nerves will make myomectomy feasible. Larger fibroids attenuate the rectus muscles and fascia,
making them more pliable and will allow access to the enlarged uterus. (See "Incisions for open
abdominal surgery".)
For some patients with large fibroids, a vertical incision may be required; however, use of GnRH
agonists can reduce uterine size and allow use of a transverse or smaller vertical incision. A
meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials demonstrated that pretreatment with a GnRH agonist
compared with placebo or no treatment prior to open abdominal myomectomy significantly
reduced uterine size (uterine volume: 159 mL smaller; gestational size: 2.2 weeks less) [19]. The
only trial that evaluated choice of incision found that GnRH agonist use was associated with
fewer vertical incisions (0 of 13 versus 5 of 15) [21].
The disadvantages of preoperative GnRH therapy, however, outweigh the advantages for most
patients. Randomized trials have not found that use of these agents reduces the risk of blood
transfusion. Also, many surgeons report that these medications result in increased difficulty
enucleating fibroids and small randomized trials have found that their use increases the risk of
persistent myomas. Thus, we suggest not using GnRH agonist pretreatment for patients
undergoing open myomectomy. Most patients can have an open abdominal myomectomy
through a large Pfannenstiel incision, even for very large fibroids. By dissecting the fascia off of
the rectus muscles, both in the midline and laterally up to the umbilicus, the rectus muscles can
be spread further laterally to give the surgeon more room to deliver the uterus. Use of these
agents (GnRH) may be a reasonable option in patients for whom treatment would allow a
transverse rather than a vertical incision and who place a high priority on type of surgical
incision. (See "Incisions for open abdominal surgery", section on 'Pfannenstiel's incision'.)
A detailed discussion of the effect of GnRH agonists on blood loss during myomectomy can be
found separately. (See "Techniques to reduce blood loss during abdominal or laparoscopic
myomectomy", section on 'GnRH agonists'.)
In our practice, we give prophylactic antibiotics for open abdominal myomectomy, since
avoidance of pelvic infection with regard to fertility preservation may be an issue. (See "Long-
term complications of pelvic inflammatory disease", section on 'Infertility'.)
PROCEDURE
Techniques to reduce blood loss during myomectomy are discussed separately. (See
"Techniques to reduce blood loss during abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy", section on
'Intraoperative measures'.)
Uterine incision — The uterus is palpated to locate the leiomyomas. Careful planning and
placement of uterine incisions can avoid inadvertent extension of the incision to the cornua or
ascending uterine vessels.
The uterine incisions may be either vertical or transverse. The common teaching has been to
make vertical incisions, to prevent transection of the arcuate arteries of the uterus, which run
transversely. However, avoiding these vessels is not feasible since myomas distort normal
vascular architecture [24].
Anterior uterine incisions are associated with fewer adnexal adhesions than posterior incisions
[25]. However, if the fibroids are in the posterior uterine wall, it is usually preferable to make a
posterior incision to remove them rather than to go through the uterine cavity to remove them
via an anterior incision.
Many surgeons make a uterine incision at a location through which all or most of the myomas
can be removed. The rationale for this is that limiting the number of incisions reduces the
likelihood of adhesions to the uterine serosa, although there are no data regarding the number
of incisions and the risk of adhesions [26] (see 'Adhesive disease' below). Use of a single
incision, however, requires that tunnels be created within the myometrium to extract distant
myomas. These myometrial defects can be difficult to close, interfering with hemostasis.
Alternatively, an incision can be made directly over each myoma (or group of nearby or
apposing myomas). This approach allows both easy removal of the myomas, as well as prompt
closure of the myometrial defects to secure hemostasis [27].
Removal of myomas — The uterine incision is extended down through the myometrium and
entire fibroid pseudocapsule ( figure 3). The least vascular plane can be reached by extending
this incision a thin layer deeper than the capsule, after the myoma is initially visualized. The
myoma will then clearly be visible and may bulge slightly.
Myomas are surrounded completely by a dense vascular layer supplying the myoma and no
"vascular pedicle" exists at the base of the myoma, as demonstrated by vascular corrosion
casting and examination by electron microscopy [28].
There are many techniques to enucleate myomas. Many surgeons put traction on the
myometrial edges with Allis clamps to expose the myoma ( figure 4). The myomas are then
extirpated by grasping them with a single tooth tenaculum or towel clamp ( figure 5). The
plane between the myometrium and myoma is typically dissected bluntly (eg, using a sponge or
the back end of an empty knife handle) ( figure 6).
Closure of uterine defects — The uterine defects are closed with sutures in layers. If the
myometrial defect is deep (>2 cm), two layers may be needed to reapproximate the tissue and
achieve hemostasis ( figure 7 and figure 8). In our practice, we use a size 0 polyglactin 910
(Vicryl) suture for the myometrium. The serosa is closed with a running suture ( figure 9); we
use size 2-0 polydioxanone (PDS), but any absorbable suture may be used.
Operative challenges
Large uterus — Myomectomy can be performed safely for patients with a large uterus (≥16
weeks size), but surgical skill and experience are required. As an example, a retrospective study
of 91 patients with uterine fibroids equal to or larger than 16 weeks size who underwent open
abdominal myomectomy reported an average operative duration of 236 minutes (range 120 to
390 minutes) and an average blood loss of 794 mL (range 50 to 3000 mL) [27]. Intraoperative
blood salvage was used in patients with a blood loss >300 mL (70 patients, 77 percent) and only
7 patients (8 percent) received a blood transfusion. (See "Techniques to reduce blood loss
during abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy", section on 'Autologous blood transfusion'.)
The first step in removing a cervical or broad ligament lesion is careful inspection of the
peritoneum overlying the fibroid to identify a clear area where the peritoneum can be
incised. With careful attention to staying in the proper surgical plane, the fibroid can be
removed with traction and blunt dissection in a direction away from vital structures. Sharp
dissection, especially where the tips of the instrument cannot be seen, should be avoided.
Closure of the defect should also be carefully planned after identification of the ureter and
uterine vessels, in order to avoid injury or ligation of the ureter or injury to vessels. If necessary,
ligation of the uterine vessels may be performed to avoid bleeding.
COMPLICATIONS
Hemorrhage — The average volume of blood loss for open abdominal myomectomy varies
across studies from approximately 200 to 800 mL [14,15,27]. In series of 100 or more open
abdominal myomectomy procedures, the blood transfusion rate has varied widely from 2 to 28
percent [14,15,29]. Increasing size and number of myomas, as well as entering the uterine
cavity, are associated with increased blood loss [30].
Prevention and management of blood loss during myomectomy are discussed in detail
separately. (See "Techniques to reduce blood loss during abdominal or laparoscopic
myomectomy" and "Management of hemorrhage in gynecologic surgery".)
There are few studies of specific sites of infection following open abdominal myomectomy.
Wound infection affects 2 to 5 percent of patients after open abdominal myomectomy [29,31]. A
study of 250 myomectomy patients reported the most infections occurred in the urinary (46
percent) or respiratory tracts (38 percent) [32].
Evaluation and management of postoperative fever are discussed separately. (See "Fever in the
surgical patient".)
Routine postoperative care includes monitoring of a patient's hemodynamic and fluid status,
pain control, and reintroducing normal diet and activity. Components of inpatient postoperative
care following myomectomy include:
● We use a continuous infusion of bupivacaine via catheters placed above and below the
fascia at the time of wound closure. The pump lasts approximately four days, at which time
the catheters are removed. Postoperative pain management initially with parenteral
administration of analgesics. Patient-controlled anesthesia is also an option. This is
transitioned to the oral route when a patient can tolerate oral intake, usually on the first
postoperative day. (See "Management of acute perioperative pain".)
● Removal of the bladder catheter during the first 24 hours postoperatively. (See "Placement
and management of urinary bladder catheters in adults".)
Evaluation and management of complications are discussed above. (See 'Complications' above.)
FOLLOW-UP
Patients are encouraged to resume their normal daily activities as quickly as is comfortable.
Decisions regarding resumption of vaginal intercourse are made by the patient; there are no
medical restrictions on sexual activity [34]. Patients may return to work as soon as they have
regained sufficient stamina and mobility.
Routine postoperative instructions for patients can be found separately. (See "Patient
education: Care after gynecologic surgery (Beyond the Basics)".)
We see patients for a follow-up visit at two weeks postoperatively. The follow-up visit includes
an evaluation for potential complications and an examination of the abdomen and wound. We
review the details of the surgery and pathology results with the patient.
OUTCOME
Myomas detected after myomectomy, often referred to as recurrent, are more accurately
referred to as persistent or newly developed. Myomas persist when they are not removed or
incompletely removed at the time of surgery.
Five to 10 years after myomectomy, 27 to 62 percent of patients will have myomas detected by
ultrasound [38-40]. Considering the background prevalence of leiomyomas (77 percent in a
posthysterectomy study [41]), it is not surprising that new myomas continue to develop after
excision.
Postmyomectomy myomas are more likely in patients who have multiple versus single myomas
at time of surgery (74 versus 11 percent in one study [42]) and those who do not versus do have
a pregnancy after myomectomy (30 versus 15 percent in one study [39]). Preoperative use of
GnRH agonists is associated with an increase in the risk of postoperative myomas. (See
"Techniques to reduce blood loss during abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy", section on
'GnRH agonists'.)
After a first myomectomy, 10 to 25 percent of patients will have a second major surgery
[12,40,42-44]. The largest study (n = 568) was a nested case control study in which 21 percent of
patients who had undergone myomectomy (open abdominal, laparoscopic, or hysteroscopic)
had subsequent surgery within 1 to 10 years; the combination of surgical approaches limits the
ability to apply these data to open abdominal myomectomy [10]. Another retrospective study of
47 patients who had undergone open abdominal myomectomy reported that, at an average of
seven-year follow-up, 34 percent had subsequent surgery [11].
Risk factors for subsequent surgery are not well established. In one study, uterine size <12
weeks was associated with an increased risk of a second surgery, while other data suggest that
a larger uterus or multiple myomas are associated with a lower risk of re-operation [11,42].
There are no data regarding how many patients require medical treatment for fibroids
following myomectomy.
Issues of fertility and leiomyomas are discussed separately. (See "Causes of female infertility",
section on 'Uterus'.)
Uterine rupture during pregnancy following myomectomy is discussed in detail separately. (See
"Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas): Issues in pregnancy".)
Antepartum and intrapartum myomectomy are discussed separately. (See "Uterine fibroids
(leiomyomas): Issues in pregnancy".)
UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the
Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade
reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given
condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer
short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more
sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading
level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some
medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print
or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a
variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)
● Beyond the Basics topics (see "Patient education: Uterine fibroids (Beyond the Basics)")
● The most common indications for open abdominal myomectomy are abnormal uterine
bleeding or bulk-related symptoms (eg, pelvic/abdominal pain or pressure). Indications for
which the benefit of myomectomy is unproven include: evaluation of pelvic malignancy (eg,
ovarian or uterine cancer), infertility, and prevention of obstetric complications. (See
'Indications' above and 'Unproven indications' above.)
● For patients with bulk-related symptoms of uterine leiomyomas, the decision regarding
procedure depends upon patient characteristics and preferences (see 'Bulk-related
symptoms' above):
• The procedure of choice for patients who desire future pregnancy is myomectomy.
• For patients who do not wish to preserve fertility and do not prefer definitive surgery,
the choice must be individualized. Uterine artery embolization and laparoscopic
myomectomy are the least invasive options; eligibility for each of these procedures
depends upon patient (and fibroid) characteristics. For patients who are candidates for
either of these procedures, we suggest laparoscopic myomectomy rather than uterine
artery embolization (Grade 2B). Patients who place a high priority on avoiding
abdominal incisions may reasonably choose embolization.
• All other patients should choose the least invasive surgical approach for which they are
eligible and that is available to them (eg, open abdominal myomectomy, laparoscopic
hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy).
These figures depict the various types and locations of fibroids. An individual may have one or more types of fibroids.
Reproduced with permission from: Baggish MS, Valle RF, Guedj H. Hysteroscopy: Visual Perspectives of Uterine
Anatomy, Physiology and Pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007. Copyright © 2007 Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.
Tamoxifen therapy 2
Early menarche NA
Nulliparity 2
Diabetes mellitus 2
Estrogen-secreting tumor NA
Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) 13 to 71% lifetime risk
NA: RR not available; OR: odds ratio; BMI: body mass index.
Data from:
1. Heald B, Mester J, Rybicki L, et al. Frequent gastrointestinal polyps and colorectal adenocarcinomas in a prospective series of PTEN
mutation carriers. Gastroenterology 2010; 139:1927.
2. Pilarski R, Stephens JA, Noss R, et al. Predicting PTEN mutations: an evaluation of Cowden syndrome and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba
syndrome clinical features. J Med Genet 2011; 48:505.
3. Ramsoekh D, Wagner A, van Leerdam ME, et al. Cancer risk in MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutation carriers; different risk profiles may
influence clinical management. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2009; 7:17.
4. Riegert-Johnson DL, Gleeson FC, Roberts M, et al. Cancer and Lhermitte-Duclos disease are common in Cowden syndrome patients. Hered
Cancer Clin Pract 2010; 8:6.
5. Setiawan VW, Yang HP, Pike MC, et al. Type I and II endometrial cancers: have they different risk factors? J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:2607.
6. Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender R, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: Update of early
detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51:38.
7. Tan MH, Mester JL, Ngeow J, et al. Lifetime cancer risks in individuals with germline PTEN mutations. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18:400.
8. Ten Broeke SW, van der Klift HM, Tops CMJ, et al. Cancer risks for PMS2-associated Lynch syndrome. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2961.