Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FIinal Thesis Y.M
FIinal Thesis Y.M
(MA PROGRAM)
THE ROLE OF DECENTRALIZATION IN EMPOWERINIG
NATIONALITY ZONE
BY YIRGA MARYE
August 2021
ADDIS ABABA
Governance
Department of Federal Studies
(MA Program)
The Role of Decentralization in Empowering Nationality Administration
August 2021
Addis Ababa
Declaration
I Yirga Marye Bishaw registered no. FS/017/12 undersigned have been a student of Master of
Leadership and Governance (MA) in the Institute of Leadership and Governance Africa
leadership Excellence Academy, Sululta December 2020.
I declare that this research thesis entitled, “The role of decentralization in empowering
nationality zone: In Wag-himra nationality administration” Master’s Degree of this University, is
my original work and that all sources of materials used for this thesis paper have been duly
acknowledged. I seriously declare that this paper not submitted to any other institution anywhere
for the award of any other degree in any university.
This Thesis has submitted to for examination with my approval as university supervisor.
Name of Advisor: Dareskeder Taye (PhD)
Signature……...........………………
Date……………………………
Signature-----------------------
Date------------------------------
Acknowledgements
First of all, I would like to thank Almighty God and his Mother Virgin Mary. Almighty God is
rich in mercy, who can do all things above all else. It is the grace, charity, forgiveness, help and
kindness of Almighty God that made me still alive, achieve this success and strength and to go
through all the difficult time.
My Deepest gratitude goes to my advisor Dr.Dareskedar Taye. You were my advisor since
previous year. You are the pioneer of my life. Your deepest knowledge on research, your
unreserved effort, your constructive comments, and your patience have encouraged me. I have no
words to express your kindness. God bless you long life and good health. I would like to express
my deepest thankfulness to my lovely wife, Zerf Zeleke. You are my Hero, without your support
and encouragement everything would have been difficult. You made it possible that it seemed
impossible. Your unforgettable advice contributed a lot to my success.
My thanks also goes to Wondwosen Negedu, Debash Hailu and for their valuable support for
the success of my study. I am also grateful to thank Wag himra nationality administration
, Abergelle woreda and sekota woreda administration leader council members officers who have
provided me with the necessary data and information which are valuable for my study. Special
thanks go to zone and woreda leaders for providing their valuable time for interview. Finally, I
stretched my thanks to all who have assisted me in my career to take this position
Table of Contents
Declaration..................................................................................................................................................ii
Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................................iv
Table of Contents.....................................................................................................................................v
LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................................vii
ABBREVIATIONS....................................................................................................................................viii
CHAPTER ONE..........................................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Background of the Study...................................................................................................................1
1.2 Statement of the Problem.................................................................................................................4
1.3 Objectives of the Study......................................................................................................................7
1.3.1 General Objective.......................................................................................................................7
1.3.2 Specific Objectives......................................................................................................................7
1.4 Research Questions...........................................................................................................................7
1.5 Significance of the study....................................................................................................................8
1.6 Delimitation/Scope of the Study........................................................................................................8
1.7 Limitation of the study.......................................................................................................................9
1.8 Organization of the Study..................................................................................................................9
CHAPTER TWO.......................................................................................................................................10
REVIEW LITERATURE..............................................................................................................................10
2.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................10
2.2 Review of Theoretical Literature.....................................................................................................10
2.2.1 Definition of Decentralization...................................................................................................10
2.3 Forms of Decentralization................................................................................................................11
2.3.1 Deconcentrating or Administrative decentralization................................................................11
2.3.2 Delegation.................................................................................................................................11
2.3.3 Devolution or democratic decentralization..............................................................................12
2.4 Types of decentralization.................................................................................................................12
2.4.1 Fiscal Decentralization..............................................................................................................12
2.4.2 Debate on Decentralization..........................................................................................................16
2.5 Why all the stress about decentralization?..................................................................................17
2.5.1 Decentralization, democracy and public participation.............................................................18
2.5.2 Decentralization, poverty reduction and development............................................................18
2.5.3 Decentralization as a means to prevent ethnic clashes............................................................18
2.5.4 Risks of Decentralization...........................................................................................................19
2.6 Empowerment.............................................................................................................................20
2.7 The African Experience in Decentralization.....................................................................................21
2.8 Decentralization in Ethiopian experience........................................................................................21
2.9 Decentralization in Amhara regional State......................................................................................22
2.9.1 Local Government in Amhara Region.......................................................................................22
2.9.2 Nationality zones in Amhara Regional State.............................................................................23
2.10. Empirical evidences......................................................................................................................25
2.10 Conceptual Framework..................................................................................................................25
CHAPTER THREE.....................................................................................................................................28
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY...................................................................................................................28
3.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................28
3.2 Description of the study area..........................................................................................................28
3.2.1 Location....................................................................................................................................28
3.2.2 Topography...............................................................................................................................29
3.2.3 Population................................................................................................................................29
3.4 Sampling procedure.........................................................................................................................31
3.5 Source of Data.................................................................................................................................31
3.5.2 Secondary Data.........................................................................................................................32
3.6 Sample Technique...........................................................................................................................32
3.7 Sample Size......................................................................................................................................32
3.8 Data Collection Instruments............................................................................................................34
3.8.1 Key informant interview...........................................................................................................34
3.8.2 Focus Group Discussion (FGD)......................................................................................................35
3.8.3 Field Observation......................................................................................................................35
3.9 Method of Data Analysis..................................................................................................................35
3.10 Ethical Considerations...................................................................................................................36
CHAPTER FOUR..........................................................................................................................................37
DATA PRESENTATION ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONS..............................................................................37
REFERENCE............................................................................................................................................58
LIST OF TABLES
Abstract
The aim of this research was to assess the Role of decentralization in empowering nationality
zone in Ethiopia: In Wag himra nationality administration. The study employed case study type
research method qualitative research approach. In order to meet the objectives of the study, the
data were collected from a sample of 36 interviewers from zone and selected woreda leaders,
officers from six selected organizations through interview. Whereas focus group discussion was
conducted with two groups in selected two woredas, female youth and elders. The participants
were selected with the purposive sampling method. The findings of the study revealed that the
existence of Wag-himra nationality administrative zone has its foundation from article 39 of
federal constitution and article 73 of the regional constitution with the objective of protecting,
preserving and promoting (Empowering) Wag-himra people’s culture and language through self-
governance and self determination. However, this study found that the implementation of such
constitutional right were going on at low pace than expected due to low commitment of
administrators, financial dependence of zone administration from the regional government, weak
public participation, regional interference on zonal affairs and less decentralized power/ authority
of legal nature. Lustily it is recommended to enhance zonal autonomy, decreasing financial
dependence, increasing administrators and employee’s commitment, starting himtignga language
for administrative use, encouraging public participation in planning and managing projects.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
The introductory part of this study presents different ideas and concepts, which include
background of the study, statement of the problem, objective of the study, research questions
significance of the study, scope and limitation of the study and lastly, organization/ structure of
the study.
More than the past two decades, most nations around the world have accepted the practices of
decentralization. Particularly developing countries have made profound changes in the field of
governance, including decentralization of state structures and functions, government and service
reorganization and transition to democracy (Oxhorn et al, 2004: 8). While local government is,
practiced in all federal countries, its place and role in the governance of these countries differ
substantially. In some, local government is a constitutionally recognized sphere of government,
while in others it is merely a competence of the state government. Nevertheless, local
government has an increasing role in the governance of federal countries, placing new demands
on the theory and practice of federalism, (Stetyler, 2005).This means that local government has
long history as the practice of decentralization has come in to existence in all federal and non-
federal countries.
Since 1990s, many African countries have launched the process of decentralization. The
inefficiency of economic planning by the central government, the changing international
economic condition, structural adjustment to improve public sector performance and changing
political climate in developing countries are the basic factors that led developing countries to opt
for decentralized governance. Countries, like South Africa, Nigeria, Senegal, Burkina Faso etc.
have made a considerable leap forward in the implementation of transfer of powers to lower tiers
There is exceptional interest in decentralized systems of governance in many African and other
developing states. A number of them have established constitutionally entrenched system of
local governance. Various forces and desires drive the decentralization programmers of the
states. Yet, there are three drivers, which are common for the decentralization program of many
states. The first is the wish to enhance democratic system and public participation and the
recognition that decentralization is favorable for achieving this objective. The second is the
pressure to improve the living standard of the population of the developing states and the
certainty that decentralization can bring development. The third is the urgency to accommodate
diversity with a view to maintain a lasting peace, (World Bank 1999:107). From this perspective,
decentralization is established constitutionally from center to state and from state to local
governments.
Considering the above background, there are positive results as well as some problems in the
undertaking of the role of decentralization. The fact that sub national (regional) levels assume a
considerable role in undertaking activities that fall down under their domain can be regarded as a
positive or negative achievement. The study, therefore, assess the role of decentralization in
empowering nationality administration in Wag-himra nationality administration zone the
constitution of local authorities based Amhara regional state.
ANRS Constitution Article (71) officially declares that Wag- himra nationality council has the
highest political authority on behalf of Wag people; however, the council’s decision is subjected
to change due to regional interference. For instance, the Wag Nationality Council has decided the
function of Himtgna language as language of instruction to be limited up to grade six and
English to be the language of instruction in grade seven and eight for those pupils in the zone
who attend their primary education in Himtigna medium. Nevertheless although the zone has
Woredas council is the legislative branches of woreda administration and the highest political
organ of woredas. Members of the woredas council are directly elected by the residents of the
woreda and serves for five-year term and accountable to the people who elected them.
Nevertheless, it has been felt that Woreda councils have not yet managed to exercise sufficient
local autonomy due to several reasons such as absence of clearly established legal mandate, lack
of devolution of power, poor organization of the system and tight control and intervention by
zone nationality higher authorities (Yilmaz & Venugopal, 2008).
Practically as the researcher observed experience drawn reveals that woredas council does not
have the power to issues commands that are compatible to the existing fact of their jurisdiction
and applicable to the needs and interests of the community. Rather every policy and decision
issue is already decided by the higher authorities (Nationality zone) and pushed down to the
woredas for the sake of authorization. Most of the time woredas council held discussion on the
issue that are party concern and imposed by nationality zonal higher authorities even though they
established to identify and respond the felt need and interests of the grass root people.
Fiscal Decentralization that includes the sharing of revenue between regional and central
governments, the induced transfer and subsidies which are part of the decentralized process is
not adequate. As to Negalign (cited in Tegegne&Kassahun (2007:16-18), fiscal decentralization
was intended to assist regional governments by boosting their capacity for developing their
localities through self-initiative. He also states that despite fiscal imbalance between zonal
administrations, heavy dependence of the zonal and woreda governments on the regional
government transfer and subsidies keep on.
Hailu (2001) studied on the issue of the current decentralization process in Ethiopia the case of
Oromia regional state. He tried to show that particularly, in Oromia region, the lower levels
should have more discretionary power to undertake activities in their respective areas. Zonal and
woreda levels should operate not as totally supplements of regional governments and should
devise a system where they are not controlled bureaucratically and hierarchically by regional
As Tigabu (2018) has recommended in his study that the internal working system of council’s
need to be very transparent, responsive, participatory and free from any unnecessary
intervention. Councilors must be sensitive to public interest; legal back up from the city
administration is also needed in order to make councils strong, autonomous and powerful. The
field that councilors operating also should be open to all stakeholders as the democracy
promotion works calls for the involvements of different actors. However, he does not touch the
empowerment of councils below city and zone how they are free from any interference of other
councils (region, zone) for their decision in their jurisdiction to exercise democracy.
Some researchers try to access the role of decentralization in promoting good governance in
Ethiopia for example Hika, Feleke& Naol (2018).The finding of the study shows that the practice
of political and administrative decentralization was good. However, fiscal decentralization was
lowly practiced and remains the problem in promoting good governance. This was mainly
because power of raising and controlling own revenue, extent of expenditure planning and
financing, revenue transfer ratio, autonomy to borrow fund, financial management capacities of
local governments were low in Wolaita and Dawuro zones. But this research did not show the
role of the nationality administrative zone councils who can make decision over the allocation of
resources for developmental (Education, Health, Agricultural) institutions and their effective
implementation of the plan in relation to their power to make decision on the nationality
administration zones development.
Even more researches are conducted in decentralization and empowering ethnic minority in
Ethiopia especially in Amhara like Negalign (2010). An assessment of the current status of
Thus, this research is intended to bridge the gap of research and provide important knowledge
for political leaders, nonprofit organizations, policy makers that have significant contribution to
the socio political empowerment of nationality administration. Based on this, the researcher aims
to assess the role of decentralization and/or local government empowerment especially
nationality administrative zone, of wag-himra nationality administration zone.
Therefore, results of this study contribute to fill the knowledge gap which the role of
decentralization in empowering nationality administration. More specifically the results of this
study have the following significances:
For other research, it may use as a reference to conduct study in the area.
The study adds to very much limited works done so far in the area of Nationality Zone.
The findings and conclusions drawn from the study may helps to create awareness
among councilors, administrators, employees and people of Wag-himra nationality
administrative zone.
REVIEW LITERATURE
2.1 Introduction
The major objective of this chapter is to provide a theoretical background and empirical studies
based on existing academic knowledge for the research proposal on topic of the role of
decentralization in empowering nationality administration zone the case of wage himra Amhara
regional state. It contains also basic concepts about decentralization and self-administration
finally the conceptual frame work of the study.
The study has reviewed different existing works of literatures related to roles of decentralization
empowering local government regarding concepts, theories, definition of decentralization and
empirical research on the related topics from different materials like books, journals, e-books,
and websites, etc. Based on this way, this chapter has discussed the literature review and the
related terms in order to give readers a multi-angle view over the topic and try to keep it simple
well understand conceptual framework based on the literature review.
The central aim of this study is to assess the trend in decentralizing governmental powers and in
adequately empowering local government in Amhara regional state. It goes without saying this
task requires the need to create a degree of clarity on the concept of decentralization. Therefore,
in this part of the Study, the decentralization will be defined in various forms and it give detail
information about the study.
2.3.2 Delegation
Delegation refers to a situation where decision-making and administrative authority and
responsibility for definite tasks are transferred from a center to an autonomous sub-national unit.
The central government defines the powers, which are to be transferred. It also puts conditions
under which the delegated powers are exercised. Moreover, the center can take back the powers,
This implies that, the relationship of the central government and the sub-national government
that is entrusted with delegated powers is characterized as a ‘principal-agent relationship the
central government bears the ultimate responsibility for the decisions of the local unit.
From this point of view, the powers and responsibilities are transferred to it through
constitutional or other similar legislative instruments. Devolution refers to the transfer of
authority for decision-making, finance and management to quasi-autonomous levels of
government. In devolution, lower levels of government have a clear and legally recognized
geographical jurisdiction over which they exercise authority and within which they perform
public functions.
As described by Negalign (2010) nowadays, fiscal decentralization is the proper location by level
of government of various taxes, speeding programs, grants and regulation is becoming an
important issue not only in the literature but also in the real world. Thus, Fiscal decentralization
can take many forms, including Self- financing or cost recovery through user charges, co-
financing or co-production preparations. Through which the users participate in providing
services and infrastructure through monetary or labor contributions, development of local
revenues through property or sales tax or indirect charges, intergovernmental transfers that
change general revenues from taxes collected by the central government to local governments for
general or specific uses.
The revenue and expenditure assignments give rise to vertical and horizontal imbalances within a
country’s intergovernmental finances. In fact, every intergovernmental transfer system has two
dimensions: (I) the vertical dimension concerned with the distribution of revenues between
central and local governments and (2) the horizontal dimension, concerned with the allocation of
As Katsiaouni (2003) argued, good governance that comes about with a genuine decentralization
positively encourages both civil society and the private sector to invest and commit themselves
to a country and its localities. It also encourages foreign direct investment. International financial
and development organizations will be keen to assist development activities when there is good
governance in a country. Therefore, decentralization, by augmenting democratization and good
governance, paves the way for poverty reduction and development. So that “Public service
delivery is more equitable, efficient, of a higher quality and better geared towards responding to
local requirements and conditions as local authorities are by definition closer to the problems.
This will allow ethnic minorities to exercise self-governance to maintain their culture and way of
life. Their participation in the public sphere under decentralized systems will also have a
‘stabilizing’ effect. It is also argued that decentralized system establishes a political channel,
which serves as a forum for dialogue and reconciliation, (Mahakanjana, 2006).
Therefore, in a decentralized system, it is likely that key concerns of ethnic minorities will be
given due consideration. Furthermore, decentralized system gives ethnic minorities the chance to
use their language for work and education in their localities and to develop their culture.
As Stoker; (1996), argued that it may even be used to promote secessionist agenda. Rather than
stabilizing, decentralization may lead to inter-ethnic competition and conflict. Instead of bringing
development, decentralization may destabilize the macro economy and lead to an inequitable
growth among different localities. Those who are in favor of decentralized system, while
accepting that decentralization may pose some risks maintain that the risks are not typical to a
decentralized system. Concerning the possibility of the capture of power by no accountable and
corrupt authorities, for example, they argue that the risk is also present in a centralized system.
They even claim that, as the corrupt activities of those in centralized system have the tendency of
having a nationwide effect, they are even more harmful than those in a decentralized system are.
The retain ruling out decentralization for the fear of a risk of non-accountable and
corrupt local authorities is not the rational thing to do. Rather the effort should be
directed at creating effective system in which corrupt authorities are held
responsible. With respect to the argument that decentralization may worsen inter-
ethnic conflict and let lose secessionist groups, the opposite view is that centralized
system is rather inherently repressive of ethnic diversity. It neither allows diverse
ethnic groups to share power nor does it offer them the chance to administer ;(Oates
1999:1121).
Moreover, as Shah; (2006) argues, the majority-minority ratio of ethnic groups is most often
unchanging. A centralized system, therefore, keeps the ethnic majorities in power while
marginalizing the minorities.
When ethnic minorities are kept marginalized, they will tend to resort to violence to have
their interest recognized. Decentralized system, conversely, believed to furnish ethnic
minorities with a space to take care of their own affairs make it possible for people of
diverse identity to live together in harmony. Others in response to the concern the
argument that decentralization may endanger the nationwide development of the country
by affecting the macro economy leading to inequitable growth and service delivery among
localities argue that local governance is not a substitute to central governance. Thus, the
central government will play a role to stabilize the macro economy and to maintain
De Visser, (2005) says; the supervisory role of the central government has three elements. That
is regulation, monitoring and redistribution. Using its regulatory power, the central government
puts forth a legal framework that creates a developmental local government.
2.6 Empowerment
Empowerment is one of the important pillars in development and it has been used in many
disciplines including health (WHO, 2012), education (and in political, gender, economical and
community development. (Shah 2006);
According to Wallace (2006), the theory was designed to structure a community involvement
approach that enables community people to increase their knowledge and health care decision
making capabilities. The desired outcome of community empowerment is as community
members participate proactively in ways to attach their highest potential. The theory also
mentions empowerment of members of the community to promote changes that will address the
needs and issues identified by the community
Brosio (2004) explained that involvement means when people in the community create support
groups to identify their mutual needs, resources, and barriers to ultimately respond to a problem
the community is facing done through planning, implementing, and intervening as a group.
This mean to that in order to know the extent of authority of local empowerment the participation
of citizen is inevitable.
Thus, as will be discussed above, the regional government has established ethnic based local
units to the Oromo, Awi and Himra ethnic groups, which are regarded as indigenous ethnic
groups of the Amhara regional state.
Regional Government
W oreda
Kebele
As briefly stated above, in the Amhara regional state, there are three indigenous ethnic
minorities, which are found concentrated in certain geographical areas within the region. The
Regional Constitution recognizes the right to self-determination and self-government of these
ethnic minorities. In effect, the Constitution designates a geographical area which is inhabited by
an ethnic minority as “Nationality Zone” ARSC articles 80&91 (2001);
It also requires the establishment of government institution in these areas. Accordingly, the three
ethnic minorities in the region i.e. the Himra, Awi and Oromo ethnic minorities have their own
nationality zones. Nationality zone has three principal organs. The organs are legislative council
called nationality council (NC) and an executive council known as nationality executive council
(NEC).
Amhara NRS, designed to preserve the rights to separate administration and autonomy of various
non-Amhara ethnic enclaves living within the regional state’s borders, in this case the
Agaw/Himra ‘Special’ zones differ from other zones in the region, which – at least formally -
function only as an administrative link between woreda and region (Sarah, 2003). By contrast,
‘special’ zones are ‘self-determining units’, and incorporate an additional tier of elected
As Article 77, of Amhara National Regional Constitution, the highest executive authority of the
Nationality Administration is rested on the administrative council and accountable to the chief
administrator and the council of the nationality zone. The administrative council of the
nationality shall be recognized in such a manner as to comprise the chief administrator, deputy
chief administrator as well as those executive departments residing in the nationality
administration concerned. The powers and duties of the nationality administrative council as
discussed (Negalign, 2010:53).
Make certain the implementation of laws enacted and decision rendered by the council of
the Nationality concerned, the Regional Council as well as the Federal State Organs,
within the limits of the administration.
Prepare the annual budget proposal of the administration, submits to the council of the
nationality council and gets same implemented upon approval.
Formulate the specific economic and social development policies and strategies of the
administration, submits same to the council of the nationality and there by executes the
decisions thereon;
Ensue the maintenance of law and order as well the protection of the public Pease and
security, within the limit of the administration.
Empowering democracy
Even more researches are conducted in decentralization and empowering ethnic minority in
Ethiopia especially in Amhara like Negalign (2010). An assessment of the current status of
decentralized government and self-administration in Amhara regional state: A study condcted in
Awi nationality administrative zone. But, none has ever studied done in Wage-Himra area on this
issue.
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
This section begins with a discussion of the methodological approach of the study. It also
provides an outline of the research design, methods, tools and sources of research data with
emphasis on the data collection, targeted groups and organizations and areas where the data will
collect. The study will design to describe the role of decentralization in empowering nationality
administration zone: The case of Wag himra nationality administration zone Amhara regional
state.
3.2.1 Location
The study will be conducted in Wag-himra nationality administration. Wag-himra is found in the
Amhara regional, state and is located at 12° 38' 24" and 39° 1' 48" E. It is also situated, 720 km
North of Addis Ababa and 561 km northeast of Bahir-dear, capital city of Amhara regional state.
Interpretation of field mapping gave knowledge of the spatial distribution of possible explanatory
factors
3.2.2 Topography
The rising and falling terrain is the marked topography of the wag-himra nationality
administration. The topography of the area is composed of a chain of mountains, hills, shallow
valleys and plains that expose the natural resource to serious degradation due mainly to erosion.
In general, the nationality administration is characterized by different slopes, where 67% of the
hill, 16.8% of shallow valley and 15.9% of the plains. The elevation varies from 1500 meters to
3500 meters above sea level.
3.2.3 Population
Based on the 2007 national census conducted by the central statistical agency of Ethiopia (CSA),
the Wag-himra nationality administration zone had a total population of 426,038of whom
208759 are men and 217279 women. The majority of the inhabitants practiced Ethiopian
Orthodox Christianity, with 95.98% as their religion, while 3.8% were Muslim.
Normally, a research design determines the type of analysis you should carry out to get the
desired results. To what extent our design is good or bad depends on whether we are able to get
the answers to our research questions. If the design is poor, the results of the research also will
not be promising (Kerlinger, 1986).
The research also employs a qualitative research approach. Qualitative research is especially
suitable for the study of phenomenon where least is known and a few secondary data are
available. The reason why the qualitative method has been chosen is that it uses “unreconstructed
logic to get at what is really real -- the quality, meaning, context or images of reality in what
communities actually do, not what they say they do as on interviews (Berg, 1989: 239). The
rationale for selecting this method is to explain the existing situation concerning respondents
view about the role decentralization empowering nationality administrative zone and to gather
special information. Accordingly, this approach is helpful to indicate and explain the existing
experience and deeply investigate in Wag himra nationality administration.
The primary data were collected from the Zone and Woreda chief administrators and selected
zone and Woreda council member’s officials from selected institution key informants who have
awareness about decentralization (Federalism) either their leadership experience or their
academic knowledge. Primary data sources are gathered for a specific research project. Primary
data are more accurate and reliable compared to secondary data (Ajayi, 2017). Primary data
Table 3.1: Target participants from selected woredas and zonal leaders
Table 3.2 Target participants from selected woredas and zonal officials
Number Sample Frame Sample Unit Number of Sampling Method Data
respondent gathering
s tool
1 Zone and Administrative 1x3=3 Purposive Key
informant
woredas officer interview
Total 18
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONS
4.1. Introduction
Female 7 14.5
Total 36 100
31-40 11 30.5
41-50 17 47.2
51 and more 5 14
36 100
Vice 6 16.7
Officers 18 50
Total 36 100
Total 36 100
5 Education 12-certficate - -
Level
Diploma 6 16.7
Total 36 100
Source:
research data: 2021
From the right and participation of people the way that avers one is election of their local and
federal regional representative. To support the above basic question it is better to collect
information for the question the election and accountability of nationality zone, woreda and
kebele council members.
The way councilors assume office has great implication on their own performance and on the
overall performance of the council. Democratically elected councilors have a tendency to listens
their constituency and perform to the maximum of their potential. Among the kinds of election in
Ethiopia, Local level election is one and held at five years’ term interval to elect individuals for
nationality zone, woreda & kebele councls.
Information gathered through interview of members of the community indicates that some
people were not interested to participate in local election. Moreover, recently conducted opinion
of focused group discussion discloses that regardless of the effort made to create awareness,
local people do not actively participated in the current election as they have been had bad
memories and some of them believes that they do not seen the essence of election since only one
party compete and they think as elected members are compete for their own benefit than their
people. The election process is also not clear and fair one family member can take cared and
send it for one of them at the Election Day. But the practice as they aver woreda councils are
elected directly by the people after the woreda councils formed the nationality council members
are elected on the meeting of woreda council in every woreda and city administration as
nationality council. This shows that nationality council members did not elected by directly the
people but indirectly by the council of member woredas. Unlike none ethnic zone
administrations, Wag-himra nationality administrative zone have Nationality Council whose
members composes of elected for the purpose of being the member of woreda council, Some
elected among members of woreda council based on their performance and quota system, some
of them may be member of regional council. Then in each level of government (zonal, woreda &
kebele) chief administrator, chief and deputy speaker are elected from council members, but
other executives may or may not council member but must member of the ruling party . So, both
interview and focus group discussions show that all levels of government council members are
elected by the people directly and within their representatives and they are accountable for the
people and their mind but the appointment of cabinet is not free from relationship; it is based on
bias and fraud though it is procedurally true.
Standing from the above data it may claim that the superiority of decentralized government over
a centralized system derives... from superior information and increased participatory decision
making. Local information flows should make the identification of more effective ways of
providing services easier and increase government awareness of local needs and better targeting,
while higher participation rates in local politics should give more voice to the poor in policy
choices.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents summary main findings of the research as discussed and analyzed in the
preceding chapters. The findings are drawn on the basis of interview with nationality zone and
selected woreda administrators, officers and focus group discussion, field observation and
[Type text] Page 50
document analysis which to assess the role of decentralization in empowering nationality zone
with extent zonal self -administration autonomy is exercised, people participation and decision
making, major challenges and problems of nationality zone, the role of decentralization
empowering democracy and constraints to exercise rights and duties of nationality zone, in
Wag-himra nationality administrative zone. In addition, this chapter provides conclusions and
recommendations that the researcher suggested to role of decentralization in Wag himra
nationality administration.
5.3. Conclusion
5.4. Recommendations
Based on the major findings, the researcher suggested the following recommendation in order to
be evidence for the role of decentralization in empowering nationality zone administration in the
study area.
5.4.1. For policy Makers
For policy makers it is possible to suggest revise clearly and systematically defined division of
power between the state governments, nationality zone and woredas to effect, the functional
competences of the nationality zone and woredas in the areas of social services and economic
development clearly listed in the constitutions of the regional governments. There may be clear
authority and responsible relationship between Wag-himra nationality administrative zone and
regional administration and balancing of authority between nationality council and regional
Council.
5.4.2. For Councilors
Zonal and woreda councils may try to collect (receive) inputs from the public before going to plan and
implement programs designed by zonal government. People or beneficiaries should be asked to
legitimize or ratify projects identified and formulated by the government and be consulted from the
beginning, so that they actively participate in the planning and management of the project. The councils
may be have stand for the development of their language (Himtigna) by arguing the executives to give
emphasis local service delivery in local people.
REFERENCE
Adams, J., Khan, H., Raeside, R., & White, D. (2007).Research Methods for Graduate Business
and Social Science Students.Response Books, Business books from SAGE
ANRS constitution, (2001).Amhara regional state constitution; Bahir Dar
Bahl R. and Linn J. (1992).Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Beetham L. (1996). Theorizing democracy and local governance in King D & Stoker G (eds)
Rethinking local democracy Basingstoke: MACMILLAN.
Brosio.G.
(2004).DecentralizationinAfrica.http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/2000/fiscal/br
osio.pdf.
Creswell, W. 2009.Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed Methods
Approaches.Losangeles: Sage Publications, Inc.
De Visser J. (2005). Developmental local government: A case study of South Africa, Antwerpen-
Oxford.
Eshetu C.(1993). Issues of Vertical Imbalance fiscal decentralization in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa.
Hika N., Feleke S. and Naol S. (2008). The Role of Decentralization in Promoting Good
Governance in Ethiopia: The Case of Wolaita and Dawuro Zones. Public Policy and
Administration Research.
J. Simegn G. and Taha N.(2009). An upland farming system under transformation: Proximate
cause of land use change in Wage north Ethiopia high lands. Research.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International
Kothari,
Mehret A. (2001) Decentralization in Ethiopia: Two Case Studies on Devolution of Power and
Responsibilities to Local Authorities in Bahru Zewde and Siegfried Pausewang(edit)
(2002) Ethiopia the Challenge of Democracy from Below, Nordiska Afrikainstitutet,
Uppsala and Forum for Social Studies, Addis Ababa
Negussie, Solomon (2008). Fiscal Federalism in the Ethiopian Ethnic Based Federal System.
The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers.
Oates, W. (1999). An Essay on Fiscal Federalism, Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 37 (3),
PP. 1120-49.
Prud’Homme, R. (1995). On the Dangers Decentralization, World Bank Research Observer, Vol.
10 No. 2.
Sarah V. (2003). Ethnicity and Power in Ethiopia: The University of Edinburgh. Shag .A (2007).
Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and Budgetary
Institutions. Washington DC:World Bank Publications.
Steytler N. (2005). “Introduction” in Steytler N (ed) The Place and role of local government in a
federal system Johannesburg.
Watts L. (1998) ‗Federalism, federal political systems and federations‘: 1 Annual Review of
Political Science.
Yonatan, T. and Beken, C. V. (2013): Ethnic Federalism and Internal minorities: The Legal
Protection of Internal Minorities in Ethiopia; African Journal of International and
Comparative Law, pp. 42.
Appendix
For genuinely doing so by devoting your time and exerting effort, the researcher really remains
very grateful to you. Meanwhile, he wishes to bring in to your attention that the outcome of this
study will highly depend on your responsive, Sincere and timely response. It needs your
tolerance to complete all the questions.
1. Personal data
The researcher attends in Zonal and woreda council meetings and follows the practice and take
notes about points which are stated below in the table and the research have not any function
simply observe and tick and jot his own notes passively. On the other hand the researcher visit
main head office judicial practice and examine how service is delivered and their empowerment
to access all service in their locality administration.
No Issues of observation Yes No Remark
.
1 Is the council meeting open to the public? How are members of the
public informed about council meeting?
2 Is council autonomous in practice from the executive, e.g. through
control over its own budget, agenda, timetable, personnel, etc.?
3 Has there been a survey conducted by the councils to determine
public perception of the service quality in the woreda?
4 Do the chief administrators made decisions that are responsive to
the needs of the people? In each level.
5 Have ever raised community problem in the council‘s meeting?
6 Does judicial case get end decisions in woreda and zone level?
7 Does a financial report open to the people in each level?
8 Are there constraints or obstacles exist in zonal administration to
exercise the rights and duties as specified by Amhara regional state
constitution?
የሚከተሉትን መጠይቆች በጥንቃቄ ከተረዱ በኋላ ተገቢውን ዝርዝር ምላሽ ይስጡ፡፡ቃለ-መጠይቅ ያልተማከለ መንግስታዊ
አስተዳደር ብሄረሰብ አስተዳደሮችን በማጠናከር ስላለው ሚና በተመለከተ፡-
1. ያልተማከለ መንግስታዊ አስተዳደር በእርሰዎ ዞን ወረዳዎች እና ቀበሌዎች እንዴት ዕየተተገበረ ነው ?
ስፋትና ጥልቀቱን ቢያሳዩን?
ምሣሌ ሀ. በሰው ሓይል ስምሪት
ለ. በማቀድ
ሐ. በበጅት
2. ለብሄረሰብ አስተዳደሩ የተሰጡ ዋናኛ ሥልጣንና ተግባራት ምንምን ናቸው?
3. የፌደራል የክልልና በብሄረሰቡ አስተዳደሩ ጉዳይ ያለው ጣልቃገብነት ምን ይመስላል? ብሄረሰብ
አስተዳደሩ በወረዳዎች ወረዳዎች በቀበሌዎቸስ ጣልቃገበነት ይኖር ይሆናል?
ከዞንና በተመረጡ ወረዳዎች የማህበረሰብ ክፍሎች የትኩረት ቡድን የውይይት ዘዴዎችን በመጠቀም መረጃ
ለመሰብሰብ የተዘጋጁ የመረጃ መሰብሰቢያ መጠይቆች፡፡
1. ራስን በራስ የማስተዳደር (ያልተማከለ አስተዳደር) በብሄረሰብ ዞን ደረጃ በወረዳና ቀበሌ ደረጃ እንዴት
ይታያል? ጣልቃ ገብነትስ አለብላችሁ ታምናላችሁ? ተወያዩበት
2. የምክርቤት አባላት የአስፈጻሚዎች የተጠያቂነት ሁኔታ ምን ይመስላል?