SYLLABUS FOR STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION

TEXTBOOKS: Statutory Construction by Ruben Agpalo (latest Edition) or Canons

of Statutory Construction by Dennis B. Funa

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

A study of the different rules of statutory construction to prepare the student as

he or she attempts to discover and understand the meaning of the provisions of
the Constitution, various statutes, and the latter’s implementing rules. Before
studying the different rules of construction, this course will first equip the
student with sufficient knowledge about the process of lawmaking and the
hierarchy and classification of laws.

LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)

Course Introduction
16 Aug. to
 Course overview Syllabus Lecture
28 Aug.
 Course assignments
2021
 Course requirements Discussion

30 Aug. to 4
MODULE 1: Sept. 2021
LEGISLATIVE POWER
Syllabus Recitation
I. Legislative Power in General, Where
Lodged Textbooks Case Study

1. David v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396, May Supreme Discussion

3, 2006 Court
2. Sanidad v. COMELEC, G.R. No. L- Decisions
44640, October 12, 1976

II. Bicameralism

1. Liang v. People, G.R. No. 125865, 28

January 2000 Chavez v. Judicial and
Bar Council, G.R. No. 202242, April 16,
2013
2. Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, 235
SCRA 630

III. Extent of and Limitations on

Legislative Power

1. In re: Cunanan, 94 Phil. 534

2. Ang Nars Party List v. Executive
Secretary, G.R. No. 215746, [October 8,
2019]

1
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)
3. Belgica v. Ochoa, G.R. No. 208566,
November 19, 2013
4. Abakada Guro Party-list v. Purisima,
G.R. No. 166715, August 14, 2008, 562
SCRA 251
5. Datu Michael Abas Kida v. Senate, G.R.
No. 19671, October 18, 2011, 659
SCRA 270

MODULE 2:
STATUTES AND THEIR ENACTMENT

I. Title of Bills

1. Lidasan v. COMELEC, 21 SCRA 496

2. Giron v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 188179,
January 22, 2013

II. Formalities

1. Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, 235

SCRA 630
2. PHILJA v. Prado, G.R. No. 105371,
November 11, 1993, 227 SCRA 203
Syllabus
III. Approval of Bills
Recitation
Textbooks 6 Sept. to
1. Bolinao Electronics v. Valencia, G.R.
11 Sept. Case Study
No. L-20740, June 30, 1964, 11 SCRA
Supreme 2021
486
Court Discussion
2. Abakada Guro Party-list v. Purisima,
Decisions
G.R. No. 166715, August 14, 2008, 562
SCRA 251

IV. Evidence of Enactment of Laws

a.) Enrolled Bill Theory

1. Mabanag v. Lopez Vito, L-1223, March

5, 1947, 78 Phil. 1 (1947)
2. Arroyo v. De Venecia, G.R. No. 127255,
August 14, 1997, 277 SCRA 268

b.) Journal Entry Rule

1. Astorga v. Villegas, G.R. No. 23475,

April 30, 1974, 56 SCRA 714

Syllabus 13 Sept. to Recitation

2
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)
MODULE 3: 18 Sept.
CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUCTION Textbooks 2021 Case Study

I. Constitution, Definition and Supreme Discussion

Characteristics Court
Decisions
1. Manila Prince Hotel v. GSIS, G.R. No.
122156, February 3, 1997, 267 SCRA
408

II. General Principles of

Construction

1. Gold Creek Mining Corp. v. Rodriguez,

66 Phil. 259 (1938)

III. Aids to construction

1. Civil Liberties Union v. Executive

Secretary, 194 SCRA 317 (1991)
2. Luz Farms v. Secretary of the
Department of Agrarian Reform, 192
SCRA 51 (1990)
3. Tanada v. Cuenco, 103 Phil. 1051
(1957)
4. Galman v. Pamaran, 138 SCRA 294
(1985)

IV. Ordinary Sense v. Technical

Sense

1. Ordillo v. Commission on Elections, 192

SCRA 100 (1992)
2. Krivenko v. Register of Deeds, 79 Phil.
461 (1947)

V. Self-Executing vs. Non-Self-

Executing

1. Manila Prince Hotel v. GSIS, G.R. No.

122156, 3 February 1997.
2. Pamatong v. COMELEC, G.R. No.
161872, April 13, 2004

VI. Mandatory v. Directory

1. Tanada v. Cuenco, 103 Phil. 1051

(1957)
2. Gonzales v. COMELEC, G.R. No.

3
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)
28196, November 9, 1967

VII. Prospective v. Retroactive

1. Filoteo v. Sandiganbayan, 263 SCRA

222 (1996)
2. Co v. Electoral Tribunal, 199 SCRA 692
(1991)

Syllabus 20 Sept. to Recitation

MODULE 4: 25 Sept.
EFFECTIVITY OF STATUTES Textbooks 2021 Case Study

Supreme Discussion
I. When the Constitution Becomes
Court
Effective
Decisions
1. Alfredo M. de Leon v. Hon. Benjamin B.
Esguerra, G.R. No. 78059, August 31,
1987

II. When Statute Becomes Effective

1. Civil Code, Article 2

2. Administrative Code, Book I, Chapter 5,
Section 18
3. Administrative Code, Book I, Chapter 6,
Sections 24 – 25
4. Tanada v. Tuvera, G.R. No. 63915, 29
December 1986
5. Philippine Veterans Bank v. Vega, G.R.
No. 105364, 28 June 2001

III. When Statute Becomes Effective

1. Administrative Code, Book VII,

Sections 2 – 9
2. Tanada vs. Tuvera, G.R. No. L-63915
April 24, 1985
3. Commissioner of Customs v. Hypermix
Feeds Corporation, G.R. No. 179579, 1
February 2012
4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v.
Michel J. Lhuillier Pawnshop, Inc., G.R.
No. 150947, 15 July 2003

IV. When Local Ordinance Takes

Effect

1. Local Government Code, Sections 54 –

4
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)
59
2. Municipality of Paranaque v. V.M.
Realty Corporation, G.R. No. 127820,
20 July 1998
3. Bagatsing v. Ramirez, G.R. No. 41631,
17 December 1976

V. Manner of Computing Time

1. Civil Code, Article 13

2. Administrative Code, Book I, Chapter 8,
Section 31
3. Administrative Code, Book I, Chapter 7,
Section 28
4. National Marketing Corp. v. Tecson,
G.R. No. 29131, 27 August 1969
5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v.
Primetown Property Group, Inc., G.R.
No. 162155, August 28, 2007
6. PNB v. Court of Appeals, 222 SCRA
134 (1993)
7. Yapdiangco v. Buencamino, G.R. No.
28841, 24 July 1983

VI. Effectivity of Laws Until

Repealed

1. Concept of Temporary Statutes

2. Co Kim Chan v. Valdez Tan Keh, G.R.
No. L-5, 17 September 1945
3. William F. Peralta v. The Director of
Prisons, G.R. No. L-49, 12 November
1945
4. Anastacio Laurel v. Eriberto Misa, G.R.
No. L-409, 30 January 1947

Syllabus 27 Sept. to Recitation

MODULE 5: 2 Oct. 2021
CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION Textbooks Case Study

I. Definition Supreme Discussion

Court and
1. Caltex (Phils.), Inc. v. Palomar, G.R. Court of Quiz
No. 19650, 29 September 1966 Appeals
Decisions
II. Purpose of Construction

1. City of Baguio v. Marcos, G.R. No.

26100, 28 February 1969

5
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)
III. When construction is resorted to

1. Garcia v. Social Security Commission,

G.R. No. 170735, 17 December 2007

IV. Executive Construction

1. Commissioner of Customs v. Hypermix

Feeds, G.R. No. 150947, 15 July 2003
2. Victorias Milling Co. Inc. v. Social
Security Commission, 4 SCRA 627

V. Judicial Construction

A. Basis, Extent, and Limitations

1. Article VIII, Section 1 and Section 4 of

the 1987 Constitution
2. Record of the Constitutional
Commission, 434-436 (1986)
3. Endencia v. David, 93 Phil. 696 (1953)
4. Marcos v. Manglapus, G.R. No. 88211,
15 September 1989

B. Requisites for Judicial Review

1. Southern Hemisphere Engagement

Network, Inc. v. Anti-Terrorism Council,
G.R. No. 178552, 5 October 2010
2. David v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396, 3
May 2006

C. Effect of Unconstitutionality

1. Article 7, New Civil Code

2. Peralta v. Civil Service Commission,
G.R. No. 95832, 10 August 1992
3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v.
San Roque Power Corporation, G.R.
No. 187485, 8 October 2013
4. Araullo v. Aquino, G.R. No. 209287, July
1, 2014

11 Oct. to
MID-TERM EXAMINATIONS 16 Oct. 2021

6
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)

Syllabus 18 Oct. to Recitation

MODULE 6: 30 Oct. 2021
LITERAL INTERPRETATION AND Textbooks Case Study
DEPARTURE THEREFROM
Supreme Discussion
A. Li t er al I nt er pr et at i on Court
Decisions
I. Ver ba Legi s

1. TRADE AND INVESTMENT

DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF
THE PHILIPPINES v. CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION, G.R. No. 182249, March
5, 2013 (Application of the rule)

I I. Dur a l ex sed l ex

1. OLYMPIO REVALDO v. PEOPLE OF

THE PHILIPPINES, G.R. No. 170589,
April 16, 2009
2. ARNEL SAGANA v. RICHARD A.
FRANCISCO, G.R. No.161952, October
2, 2009

B. Depar t ur e f r om li t er al
i nt er pr et at i on

I. St at ut es m ust be capabl e
of i nt er pr et at i on

1. MIRIAM DEFENSOR-SANTIAGO v.
COMELEC, G.R. No. 127325, March
19, 1997

II . Rat i o l egi s et ani m a

1. RODOLFO G. NAVARRO v.
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY EDUARDO
ERMITA, G.R. No. 180050, April 12,
2011
2. ATONG PAGLAUM, INC. v.
COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, G.R.
No. 203766, April 2, 2013

II I. Lit er al im por t m ust yi el d

7
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)
t o i nt ent

1. AUTOMOTIVE PARTS & EQUIPMENT

COMPANY v. JOSE B. LINGAD, G.R.
No. L-26406, October 31, 1969
2. UNITED STATES v. TORIBIO, 15 Phil.
85 (1910)
3. SY TIONG SHIOU v. SY CHIM and
FELICIDAD CHAN SY, G.R. No.
174168, March 30, 2009

IV. Cessante ratione legis, cessat

et ipsa lex

1. B/GEN. JOSE COMENDADOR v.

GEN. RENATO S. DE VILLA, G.R. No.
93177, August 2, 1991

V. Suppl yi ng l egi sl at i ve
omi ssi on

1. GOVERNOR RODOLFO C. FARINAS

v. MAYOR ANGELO M. BARBA, G.R.
No. 116763, April 19, 1996

VI. Const r uct i on t o avoi d

absur di t y

1. PARAS v. COMELEC, G.R. No.

123169, 4 November 1996

VII . Const r uct i on in f avor of

ri ght and j ust i ce

1. KAREN E. SALVACION v. CENTRAL

BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, CHINA
BANKING CORPORATION and GREG
BARTELLI y NORTHCOTT, G.R. No.
94723, August 21, 1997

VII I. Law does not r equi r e the

im possi bl e

1. PEDRO T. SANTOS, JR. v. PNOC,

G.R. No. 170943, September 23, 2008

I X. Num ber and gender of

8
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)
w or ds

1. SANTILLON v. MIRANDA, G.R. No.

19281, June 30, 1965

MODULE 7:
IMPLICATIONS

I. Necessary Implications

1. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES (DENR)
v. UNITED PLANNERS
CONSULTANTS, INC., G.R. No.
212081, February 23, 2015
2. SUGBUANON RURAL BANK, INC. v.
HON. UNDERSECRETARY
BIENVENIDO E. LAGUESMA, G.R. No.
116194, February 2, 2000 Syllabus
Recitation
II. Grant of power includes Textbooks
3 Nov. to 6
incidental power Case study
Nov. 2021
Supreme
1. CARMELO F. LAZATIN v. HRET, G.R. Court Discussion
No. 84297, December 8, 1988 Decisions
2. CEMCO HOLDINGS, INC. v.
NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES,
INC., G.R. No. 171815, August 7, 2007

III. What cannot be done directly

cannot be done indirectly

1. TAWANG MULTI-PURPOSE
COOPERATIVE v. LA TRINIDAD
WATER DISTRICT, G.R. No. 166471,
March 22, 2011

Syllabus 8 Nov. to 27 Recitation

MODULE 8: Nov. 2021
INTERPRETAION OF WORDS AND Textbooks Case Study
PHRASES
Supreme Discussion
I. In General Court
Decisions
1. JOSEPH EJERCITO ESTRADA v.
SANDIGANBAYAN, G.R. No. 148560,
19 November 2001.

9
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)
2. JOSE JESUS M. DISINI, JR. v.
SECRETARY OF JUSTICE, G.R. No.
203335, 11 February 2014.

II. General rules of interpretation

1. ATTY. REYNANTE B. ORCEO v.

COMELEC, G.R. No. 190779, 26
March 2010
2. MUSTANG LUMBER, INC. v. HON.
COURT OF APPEALS, G.R. No.
104988, 18 June 1996.

III. Where the law does not

distinguish

1. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v.

DAISY R. YAHON, G.R. No. 201043,
June 16, 2014
2. VISAYAS COMMUNITY MEDICAL
CENTER (VCMC) v. ERMA YBALLE,
G.R. No. 196156, January 15, 2014

IV. Disjunctive and Conjunctive

Words

1. ANTONIO D. DAYAO v. COMELEC,

G.R. No. 193643, January 29, 2013
2. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v.
ANTONIO COMADRE, G.R. No.
153559, June 8, 2004
3. GONZALES v. COMELEC, G.R. No.
28196, November 9, 1967

V. Noscitur a sociis

1. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v.

ISIDRO FLORES, G.R. No. 188315,
August 25, 2010
2. CESAR M. CARANDANG v. VICENTE
SANTIAGO, G.R. No. L-8238, May 25,
1955

VI. Ejusdem generis

1. EMETERIA LIWAG v. HAPPY GLEN

LOOP HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC., G.R. No.

10
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)
189755, July 4, 2012
2. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v.
COURT OF APPEALS, G.R. No.
33471, January 31, 1972.

VII. Expressio unius est exclusion

alterius and casus omissus

1. SAN PABLO MANUFACTURING

CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER
OF INTERNAL REVENUE, G.R. No.
147749, June 22, 2006
2. COCONUT OIL REFINERS ASSN.,
INC. v. TORRES, G.R. No. 132527,
July 29, 2005
3. THE COMMISSION ON AUDIT OF
THE PROVINCE OF CEBU v.
PROVINCE OF CEBU, G.R. No.
141386, November 29, 2001

VIII. Reddendo singula singulis

1. MA. MERCEDITAS N. GUTIERREZ v.

THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE, G.R. No.
193459, February 15, 2011
2. CITY OF MANILA v. LAGUIO, G.R.
No. 118127, April 12, 2005

IX. Provisos, Exceptions and Saving

Clauses

1. RICARDO FERNANDEZ v. NLRC,

G.R. No. 106090, February 28, 1994
2. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE v. FILIPINAS COMPANIA
DE SEGUROS, G.R. No. L-14880,
April 29, 1960
3. ARENAS v. CITY OF SAN CARLOS,
G.R. No. 34024, April 5, 1978
4. CHARTERED BANK OF INDIA v. C. A.
IMPERIAL, G.R. No. L-17222, March
15, 1921
5. ROBERTO S. BENEDICTO v. COURT
OF APPEALS, G.R. No. 125359,
September 4, 2001
6. BALAGTAS MULTI-PURPOSE
COOPERATIVE, INC. v. COURT OF
APPEALS, G.R. No. 159268, October
27, 2006

11
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)

MODULE 9:
STATUTES CONSTRUED AS A WHOLE
AND IN RELATION TO OTHER STATUTES

I. Statutes construed as a whole

1. AQUINO v. QUEZON CITY, G.R. No.

137534, August 3, 2006
2. LIWAYWAY VINZONS-CHATO v.
FORTUNE TOBACCO Syllabus
CORPORATION, G.R. No. 141309, Recitation
June 19, 2007 Textbooks
3. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. 29 Nov. to 4
Case Study
LUISITO D. BUSTINERA, G.R. No. Dec. 2021
Supreme
148233, June 8, 2004 Court Discussion
Decisions
MODULE 10:
MANDATORY AND DIRECTORY STATUTES

1. Article 5, New Civil Code

2. ACOSTA v. ADAZA, G.R. No. 168617,
February 19, 2007
3. LUIS K. LOKIN, JR. v. COMELEC, G.R.
Nos. 179431-32, June 22, 2010
4. FLORANTE S. QUIZON v. COMELEC,
G.R. No. 177927, February 15, 2008
Syllabus 6 Dec. to 18 Recitation
MODULE 11: Dec. 2021
STRICT OR LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION Textbooks Case Study

I. Statutes strictly construed Supreme Discussion

Court
A. Penal laws Decisions Quiz

1. INTESTATE ESTATE OF MANOLITA

GONZALES VDA. DE CARUNGCONG
v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
G.R. No. 181409, February 11, 2010
2. GERARDO R. VILLASEÑOR v.
SANDIGANBAYAN, G.R. No. 180700,
March 4, 2008

B. Statutes in derogation of rights

1. HEIRS OF ALBERTO SUGUITAN v.

MANDALUYONG, G.R. No. 135087,

12
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)
March 14, 2000
2. PHILACOR CREDIT CORPORATION v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE, G.R. No. 169899, February
06, 2013
3. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE v. KUDOS METAL
CORPORATION, G.R. No. 178087, May
5, 2010
4. MAPULO MINING ASSOCIATION v.
HON. FERNANDO LOPEZ, G.R. No. L-
30440, February 7, 1992

C. Statutes granting privileges

1. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE v. PHILIPPINE LONG
DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY,
G.R. No. 140230, December 15, 2005
2. RAOUL B. DEL MAR v. PAGCOR, G.R.
No. 138298, November 29, 2000
3. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v.
KERRY LAO ANG, G.R. No. 175430,
June 18, 2012

D. Exceptions and provisos

1. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE v. THE COURT OF
APPEALS, CENTRAL VEGETABLE
MANUFACTURING CO., INC., G.R. No.
107135, February 23, 1999
2. GEOLOGISTICS, INC. v. GATEWAY
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, G.R.
Nos. 174256-57, March 25, 2009

II. Statutes Liberally Construed

1. RE: APPLICATION FOR

SURVIVORSHIP PENSION BENEFITS
UNDER REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9946,
A.M. No. 14155-Ret., November 19,
2013
2. MARIA OBRA v. SSS, G.R. No. 147745,
April 9, 2003
3. IN RE: PETITION FOR ADOPTION OF

13
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING WEEK/
(activities
RESOURCE DATE
designed
S (Schedule
by the
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and of each
teacher to
(arrangement or sequence of the major non-print Topic,
bring
topics is based on a logical order) materials Assignment
about, or
and online/ , Exam for
create the
open-access the entire
conditions
resources) semester)
for
learning)
MICHELLE P. LIM, G.R. Nos. 168992-
93, May 21, 2009
4. THE COCA-COLA EXPORT
CORPORATION v. CLARITA P.
GACAYAN, G.R. No. 149433,
December 15, 2010
5. REGIONAL AGRARIAN REFORM
ADJUDICATION BOARD v. COURT OF
APPEALS, G.R. No. 165155, Apr 13,
2010
6. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE v. BASF COATING, G.R.
No. 198677, November 26, 2014
7. RAMON A. SYHUNLIONG v.
TERESITA RIVERA, G.R. No. 200148,
June 4, 2014

10 Jan. to
FINAL EXAMINATIONS 15
Jan. 2022

14