REPORT WAKISO SITE INTERIOR PAINTIG

This report has been written in good will as a follow up on the interior painting work done
by a local contractor, whom I recommended, in the month of July 2020, having received a
complaint of a few defects from the client in the month of August 2021.
Its intended identify any paint defects, causes and remedies.

Findings/Observations
Peeling Problems- Some walls in the seating room were insufficiently prepared due to use of
coarse sanding paper before the application of finishing coat. It’s also observed that some of
the patches were due to damages due to furniture fixtures and had created points of
peeling.
Remedy- Sand damaged area and repaint
Light sanding Marks- Due to use of coarse sanding paper, and insufficient film build as the
silk malt paint that was quoted would not sufficiently fade then out.
Remedy- Thoroughly sand damaged area with low gauge coarse sanding paper and repaint.
Color off shade- This is observed in one of the master bedroom walls where possibly only
one coat of paint was applied as the available silk paint wasn’t sufficient making it appear
pale.

Recommendations.
We recommend the above remedies be performed so that these defects are rectified.

Implementation of remedies.
The local contractor has come up with a budget implement the above mentioned remedies
only to the extent of the work he did(which was only interior) and is attached to this
document, and is willing to contribute up to 50 percent of the action plan budget, in terms
of physical labour and additional purchase of some items.

It’s important to note the following.

All materials were purchased through the client’s entrusted party at their own store of
choice, escorted by the contractor to verify the list quotations and prices except for the
master bedroom silk paint that was purchased by the contractor, however some materials
like the A4 sand paper which was requested for smoothening was not provide upon
request.
It should also be noted that the painter also used some materials like white cement and
undercoat which were already on site upon the client’s request and therefore had no direct
bearing in the handling of purchase income as the client may claim.
Some of the defects were overly exaggerated and are uttered in bad faith without due
consideration of the actual condition under which the work was done.
That this evaluation has been done almost 11 months after work completion and there
might not be able to completely establish the cause of some claims and therefore can’t have
the entire bearing of fault on the contractor.

WAKISO SITE DEFECTS RECTIFICATION QUOTATION

Undercoat 2jr@60000 120000

Filler 2 bags @30,000 60000
Sandpaper 3meters, @3000 9000
A4ps @2500 7500
Masking tape 10pcs@2000 20,000
Matt ceiling 2tins@55000 110000
Master Bedroom 2tins@55000 110000
Paint matt 2tins@55000 110,000
Sandstone 2tins@55000 110,000
Brush 3pcs 9000
Roller 2pcs 20000
Total material cost 685500
Labour 400,000
TOTAL 1,085,500