Doc. No.

:- ML-18 A
RISK REGISTER Rev. No. :- 00
AMSAT INDUSTRIES
PROCESS NAME : HUMAN RESOURCE PROCESS OWNER : - Mr. Tapan Dalal Eff. Date :- 1/13/2020
CORE TEAM : - Mr. Tapan Dalal, Mr. Prateek Dalal, Mr, Praveen Sangwan, Mr. Ajeet Singh Severit Occurren Page No. Actual 1 of 1
S. Area / Interested Requirements Issue type SWOT Risk Impact y ce Current controls SxO Recommended Resp Target S O Estimated completi S O Actual S x
No. Section Parties Action(s) if any SxO O
(S) (О) on date
Conducting safety audits
and subsequent actions Head - HR 31.07.20
No accidents Internal issues S Accidents Man hour loss, Affects Morale 5 1 Safety committee, Poka 5 5 1 5
Yoke & Safety Audit
Conduct training on Head - HR 31.07.20
safety
Medical & Health Medical & Health Check
Safety

1 Human Resource Monitoring of Health & Internal Issue S Occupational Health & Safety Personal injury 5 2 Check up & Doctor's 10 upRegular
reportstesting
sharing&& Head - HR 31.07.20 5 1 5
/ Employees Safety Issues issues not monitored Environment
Monitoring of Environment Internal Issue S Environmental issues Impact on environment 5 2 Visit testing, 10
monitoring
actions of Head - HR 31.07.20 5 1 5
Personal protative equipment monitoring & Reports environmental
Monitoring by
Availability of PPE Internal Issue S (PPE) not available Personal injury 5 2 Daily check sheet 10 perametersleaders
supervisors/line Head - HR 31.07.20 5 1 5
Disaster Risk management not Mock Drills on alternet Effective monitoring of Head - HR
Risk Management Internal Issue S considered during emergency Effect on company assests 5 2 month 10 mock drills 31.07.20 5 1 5
handling Safety committee,
low Productivity, High Internal & External Effective implemaintation
Safe Working environment Internal Issue S Unsafe working environment absentism, High health related 5 2 Production allowance, 10 Developfindings
of of all
SSDC/BOAT/NAP Head - HR 31.07.20 5 1 5
issues Safety Audits, Mock audits/drills
Availability of adequate Internal / Non-availability of adequate MonthlyDrills
Attendance scheme for trainned Head - HR 31.07.20
S Production loss 3 3 9 OnDefine
campus recruitment
Skill set, Skill
manpower 3 1 3
manpower External issues manpower Incentives & Other Head - HR 31.07.20
as per required
Assesment skills
Test, Training
Recruitment

Benefits Head - HR 31.07.20

Human Resource - On the job, Class room
2 / All functions Competent manpower Skill Matrix, Training on job knowledge
Internal issues S In competent
Deley manpower
in availability of Not meeting quality objectives 3 2 Plan Vs Actual 6 Competance Mapping for Head - HR 3 1 3
31.07.20
competent manpower due to Interviewstaff
schedulling
timely interview schedulling not Internal team, through online module
On time Recruitment Internal issues W done, timely interview not Low Productivity, quality issues 3 4 12 with availability Head - HR 16.07.20 3 2 6 31.07.20 3 1 3
performed, Competent Consultancy acceptance of interviewer
manpower did not apear for & candidate.
interview.
Compliance to legal External issues S Non compliance to legal Legal notice / Penalty 5 1 Legal compliance 5 Track monitor compliance Head - HR 31.07.20 5 1 5
requirements requirements register to legal requirement
Statutory and
Legal

3 Regulatory
bodies /
Organisation
On time submission of Monthly / Yearly legal Return Tracking through check Display board for all
External issues S Legal violation 5 1 5 Head - HR 31.07.20 5 1 5
Return submission not followed Sheets, MIS & Reviews. returns

Monitoring & Daily monitoring,

Correct salary to be paid Internal Issue S Paid days not correct Wrong salary paid 3 3 Tracking, Sharing & 9 verification, sharing & Head - HR 31.07.20 3 1 3
All functions

Varification
Resource /

Rate of wages updated as Internal Issue S Rate of wages not updated Wrong salary paid 3 1 implementation of 3 Updation Head - HR 31.07.20
Process
per Govt.owner
Rule should have Specified training on
Human
Payroll

4 the knowledge of HR Internal Issue S Lack of policy knowledge to the Wrong salary paid 3 2 Trainings & OJT on
notification 6 payroll & automatated Head - HR 31.07.20 3 1 3
Policies. System process
not uptoowner
the mark for payroll
Timely process
update by IT process
System updation Internal Issue W payroll Wrong salary paid 3 2 6 Automatated updation Head - HR 31.07.20 3 1 3
On time leave application Internal Issue W Employees notcalculaion
apply leaves on Salary not prepared on time 2 5
department
Online leave 10 Attendance sharing & Head - HR 31.07.20 2 3 6 2 1
Employee Employees nottimespare time for application system display on weekly basis
upgradationthrough training Internal Issue trainings Unable to enhance skills
Cometent Trainer Internal Issue Trainer is not competent Unable to deliver training goals
Human Resource / All functions

Relevent training topic Internal Issue The topic of training is not Not take interest in training
relevent
Traning

5
Effectiveness monitoring Internal Issue Effectiveness
HOD of training
not involved not
effectively Not meet the objective of
monitored
HOD not involved effectively in training
Management involvement Internal Issue Effectiveness employees not take part actively
identifying theoftraining
trainingneeds
not of Not meet the objective of
Effectiveness monitoring Internal Issue monitored
Person not result
his people spare in no regular
from result for training
Internal Issue employee
work and organization
at shopfloor for their Unable to enhance skills
planned training needs Mis-communication, Roles not
Induction program Internal Issue No Induction Program clear,Productivity,
Low moral quality issues,
Training Internal Issue Lack of Training Low
Low moral
Employee Motivation &

Employee Satisfaction Internal Issue No action on output of survery Employee dissatisfaction

Empowerment

Human Resource
/ All functions Audit Finding should be
fruitful Internal Issue No good audit findings No improvement

Continous Improvement Internal Issue No time for improvement (QC NoProduction

effective progress of projects
Human Resource (QC)
Meet the departmental implementation)
Not meeting departmental 1. loss
Internal 2. Not able to meet delivery
/ All functions goals Goals May lead to failure in
targets
Company Culture Internal performing particular job
All Plant Awareness on Company Company Policy Awareness not Not follow the rules and
Should
Policiesbe as per Training Internal given to all interested parties regulation of of
company
Target Internal Competence employees not
Should be conducted as per
(6.67/employee/year) achieved as planned
Competence of employees not
Trainingbe
Calendar Internal achieved as planned
Should as per our Internal Competence of employees not achieved as planned
Performance

Training Manual
6 HR
 Performance
HR Code of Conduct
6
(i) No Abesenteeism/ Internal High absenteeism Low Productivity, quality issues
low absenteeism
(ii) No Late Coming

Human Resource Participate in QCC, QIT,

/ All functions High Moral Internal issues O Low Morale Low Efficiency 3 2 Suggestion monitoring 6 Reward for Kaizens Head - HR Ongoing 3 1 3
 Doc. No. :- ML-18 B
RISK REGISTER Rev. No. :- 00
AMSAT INDUSTRIES
Annexure - 1 Eff. Date :- 1/13/2020

CORE TEAM : Page No. :- 1 of 1

Risk Rating Calculation

Safety /
Loosing Customer
Loss to Interested Parties Loss of few
Minor Losses
organization dissatisfaction Orders
/ Severity Example
Violation of legal
Severity requirements.

Likelihood
1 2 3 4 5 Minor Losses Short supplies, Documention error, Minor accident

Premium freight, COPQ high, Deployment of additional

5 Several times a week 5 10 15 20 25 Loss to organization
resources,

Low customer satisfication score, Repeat customer

Interested Parties
4 Once in a fortnight 4 8 12 16 20 complaints, Line stoppage, Price escalation, Low
dissatisfaction
morale

Reduced sales, Reduced profitability, Share of

3 Once in a month 3 6 9 12 15 Loss of few Orders
Business loss

2 Once in 3 months 2 4 6 8 10
Safety /
Loosing Customer / Loss of Business, Notice from legal authorities, Fatal
Violation of legal accidents, Customer notification to certification body.
1 Once in 6 months or less 1 2 3 4 5 requirements.

Risk Rating Action required

Extreme risk Immediate action required with Top management involvement

High Risk Action required with senior management involvement

Moderate risk Action required with Specific person responsibility

Low risk No action required