Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sommerfeld Theory of Metals
Sommerfeld Theory of Metals
Solution: 2k 2
E (k ) =
2m
1 ik⋅ x
Ψ ( x) = e
V
2
Normalization ∫ Ψ ( x) dV = 1
ik y L
2π
Periodic Boundary Condition (PBC) e ik x L
=e =e ik z L
=1 ⇒k = (nx , n y , nz )
L
Free electron gas in QM (2)
A system of N identical free electrons
For fermions, anti-symmetric wave functions are expected
Ψ ( x1 , x2 , , xi , , x j , , x N ) = −Ψ ( x1 , x2 , , x j , , xi , , x N )
Eigenstates (without spin): e ik1 ⋅ x1
e ik 2 ⋅ x1
e ik N ⋅ x1
ik1 ⋅ x2 ik 2 ⋅ x 2 ik N ⋅ x 2
e e e
Ψ=
ik1 ⋅ x N ik 2 ⋅ x N ik N ⋅ x N
e e e
Energy
2 2 2 2
E= (k1 + k 2 + + k N )
2m
E d 3k 2 k 2 1 2 k F5 3 N
= 2∫ = = EF
V (2π ) 3 2m 10π 2 m 5 V
E 3 3
⇒ = E F = k BTF
N 5 5
In classical mechanics
E 3
= k BT → 0 when T → 0 !
N 2
v2 2 TF
QM
= ~ 10 2 at room temperature
v2 5 T
CM
Thermodynamics (1)
Fermi-Dirac distribution: nk = f (ε k )
1 1
f (ε ) = , β =
1 + e β (ε − µ ) k BT
d 3k
n = 2∫ n
(2π ) 3 k
At zero temperature,
1, ε < µ
f (ε ) = ⇒ µ = EF at ground state
0, ε > µ
Energy (density): d 3k 2 k 2 k 2 dk 2 k 2 2k 2
U = 2∫ nk = ∫ 2 f( )
(2π ) 2m
3
π 2m 2m
= ∫ dε g (ε )ε f (ε )
Density of states: g (ε ) = ∑ δ (ε − Em )
m
k 2 dk
At 3D, = g (ε )dε
π 2
−1
k 2 dε k2 m m 2mε
⇒ g (ε ) = 2 = 2 2 = 2 2
π dk π k π 2
1/ 2
3 n ε
=
2 EF EF
Thermodynamics (3)
Sommerfeld expansion:
ε
∫
To compute the integral I = dε H (ε ) f (ε ) , we define K (ε ) = ∫ H (ε ' )dε '
−∞
Therefore H (ε ) = dK (ε ) , and
dε
dK (ε ) df (ε )
I = ∫ dε f (ε ) = ∫ dε K (ε ) − ε = +∞
+ K (ε ) f (ε ) |ε = −∞
dε dε
∞
dn (ε − µ ) n
Using Taylor expansion about ε=μ, K (ε ) = ∑ n K (ε ) |ε = µ
n = 0 dε n!
µ
(ε − µ ) 2 n
∞
∂f d 2 n −1
⇒ I = ∫ dεH (ε ) + ∑ ∫ − dε 2 n −1 H (ε ) ε = µ
−∞ n =1 (2n)! ∂ε dε
µ ∞
d 2 n −1
= ∫ dεH (ε ) + ∑ an (k BT ) 2n
H (ε ) ε = µ
−∞ n =1 dε 2 n −1
x 2n d 1
an = ∫ dx −
(2n)! dx 1 + e x
Thermodynamics (4)
Sommerfeld expansion:
µ 6
π2 7π 4 k BT
∫ ε ε ε ∫−∞ ε ε µ µ
2 4 ( 3)
d H ( ) f ( ) = d H ( ) + ( k B T ) H ' ( ) + ( k B T ) H ( ) + O
6 360 µ
4
Chemical potential: µ
π2 k T
n = ∫ dε g (ε ) f (ε ) = ∫ dε g (ε ) + (k BT ) 2 g ' ( µ ) + O B
0
6 µ
EF µ
π2 π2
n = ∫ dε g (ε ) ⇒ ∫ dε g (ε ) + ( k BT ) g ' ( µ ) = 0 ⇒ ( µ − E F ) g ( E F ) +
2
( k BT ) 2 g ' ( E F ) = 0
0 EF
6 6
(π k BT ) 2 g ' ( EF )
µ = EF −
6 g ( EF )
1/ 2
3 n ε 1 π k T 2
g (ε ) = ⇒ µ = EF 1 − B
2 E F EF 3 2 EF
Thermodynamics (5)
Sommerfeld expansion:
µ 6
π2 7π 4 k BT
∫ ε ε ε ∫−∞ ε ε µ µ
2 4 ( 3)
d H ( ) f ( ) = d H ( ) + ( k B T ) H ' ( ) + ( k B T ) H ( ) + O
6 360 µ
Energy density:
µ 4
π2 k T
u = ∫ dε g (ε )ε f (ε ) = ∫ dε g (ε )ε + (k BT ) [µg ' ( µ ) + g ( µ )] + O B
2
−∞
6 µ
Specific heat:
∂u ∂µ π 2 2 π2 ∂µ
CV = = g (µ )µ + k BT [µg ' ( µ ) + g ( µ )] + (k BT ) 2 [µg ' ' ( µ ) + µg ' ( µ ) + g ' ( µ )]
∂T ∂T 3 6 ∂T
3
∂µ π 2 2 k T
= g ( EF ) EF + k BT [EF g ' ( E F ) + g ( EF )] + O B
∂T 3 EF
3
(π k BT ) 2 g ' ( EF ) π 2 k B2 k T
µ = EF − ⇒ CV = Tg ( EF ) + O B
6 g ( EF ) 3 EF
Conduction in metals (1)
Reexamine the Drude model:
Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution should be replaced by Fermi-Dirac
distribution.
Can one describe the motion of an electron classically? Namely, can we
specify its position and momentum as accurately as necessary without
violating Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle?
Quantized energy levels, e.g., Landau levels in a magnetic field
The condition ΔE >> kBT is required.
ne 2τ σ0
σ0 = , σ (ω ) =
m 1 − iωτ
Mean free path:
l = v Fτ
vF2 C VQM π2
2 2π 2
= × = Drude model is qualitative correct.
v2 C VCM 3 3 9
CM
Conduction in metals (4)
Thermopower:
CV
Q=−
3ne
QM
Q QM C V π2 T −2
CM
= CM
= ~ 10 at room temperature
Q CV 3 TF
Discussions on free electron model
• The role of ion: the source of collision?
– Classical mechanics vs. Quantum mechanics
• Free electron approximation
– Crystal lattice may change the typical velocity, say, Fermi velocity
– Density of states
– Lattice contribution to specific heat and thermoconductivity
• Independent electron approximation
– Fermi-liquid theory
– Another source of collision
– Compressibility
• Relaxation time approximation
– The outcome of collision is assumed not to depend on the incoming states
– Relaxation time may depend on energy or energy exchange, thereby,
become temperature dependent
• Deviation of Wiedemann-Franz law
– When strong electron interaction is involved
– In some extreme case, the material can even become electrical insulating
but thermal conducting !
Summary
• Quantum mechanics will bring huge difference on thermodynamics
as well as transport.
• Scales in metals
EF ~ 1eV , TF ~ 10 4 K
k F−1 ~ 10 −8 cm
k F
vF = ~ 106 m / s
m
• Specific heat
π 2 k B2
CV = Tg ( EF )
3