Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Linear Algebra and Differential Equations

Sartaj Ul Hasan

Department of Mathematics
Indian Institute of Technology Jammu
Jammu, India - 181221

Email: sartaj.hasan@iitjammu.ac.in

Sartaj Ul Hasan (IIT Jammu) SMD002U1M 0 / 10


Lecture 11
(March 31, 2021)

Sartaj Ul Hasan (IIT Jammu) SMD002U1M 1 / 10


Fundamental Results (Conti . . . )
Proposition 13: If V is a finite-dimensional vector space, then any two
bases of V have the same number of elements.
Proof: Suppose B1 and B2 are two distinct bases of V such that |B1 | = m
and |B2 | = n. Then by Proposition 12(a), |B1 | ≤ |B2 | i.e. m ≤ n, since B1
is L. I. and B2 is spanning set. In a similar way, B2 ≤ B1 i. e. n ≤ m.
Hence we get: m = n.
Definition: The dimension of a finite-dimensional space is the
number of elements in a basis for V . This is written dim V .
Remark: Proposition 13 ensures that this is a proper definition.
Special Case: The zero subspace {0} is defined to have dimension 0.
However, it does not have a basis. So our insistence that dim{0} = 0
amounts to saying that the empty set of vectors is a basis of {0}.
Thus the statement that “the dimension of a vector space is the
number of vectors in any basis” holds even for zero space.

Sartaj Ul Hasan (IIT Jammu) SMD002U1M 2 / 10


Examples
dim RnR=n
dim RR = 1 √ and any non-zero real number will act as a basis, e.g.,
{1}, {−8}, { 5}, etc.
dim CC = 1 and any non-zero complex number will act as a basis,
e.g., {1}, {i}, {1 + i}, {5 − 7i}etc.
dim QQ = 1 and any non-zero rational number will act as a basis,
e.g., {1}, {a : a 6= 0 and a ∈ Q}.
dim FF = 1 and any non-zero element in F will act as a basis, e.g.,
{1}, {a : a 6= 0 and a ∈ F}.
dim CR = 2 and the set {1, i} is one of its basis.
dim Rm×n
R = mn, and one basis consists of all m × n matrices with
exactly one entry equal to 1 and all other entries equal to 0. We call
this standard basis for Rm×n
dim Rn [t]R = n + 1, and the set {1, t, t 2 , . . . , t n } is one of its bases
generally known as standard basis for Rn [t].
Sartaj Ul Hasan (IIT Jammu) SMD002U1M 3 / 10
How to find Basis

Proposition 14: Suppose S = {v1 , v2 , . . . , vn } is a linearly independent


set in a vector space V . Suppose v is a vector which is not in Span S.
Then the set obtained by adjoining v to S is linearly independent.

Proof: Suppose v is not in Span S, and consider any expression:

c1 v1 + · · · + cn vn + cv = 0 (1)

If c 6= 0, we can write: cv = −c1 v1 − · · · − cn vn


or c −1 cv = −c −1 c1 v1 − · · · − c −1 cn vn
or v = −c −1 c1 v1 − · · · − c −1 cn vn , contradicting the assumption that v is
not in Span S. Hence c = 0. Then (1) becomes c1 v1 + · · · + cn vn = 0,
and since S is linearly independent, ci = 0 for all i. Thus S ∪ {v } is
linearly independent.

Sartaj Ul Hasan (IIT Jammu) SMD002U1M 4 / 10


How to find Basis (Cont’d)
As a consequence of Proposition 14 and its proof, we get the following:
Proposition 15: Any linearly independent set S in a finite-dimensional
vector space can be expanded to a basis.
Proof: Proof is left as an exercise. The proof proceeds by applying Prop
14 repeatedly; by Prop 12, the process cannot go on indefinitely; it has to
stop, and that stage, a basis has been obtained.
In a similar way, we can get a result which works in the “opposite”
direction:
Proposition 16: Any finite spanning set S in a non-zero vector space can
be contracted to a basis.
Proof: Left as an exercise.
Remark: In view of this proposition, we can say that if a non-zero vector
space V has a finite spanning set S, then it must be finite-dimensional.
Remark: We can regard a basis as either a maximal linearly independent
set, or as a minimal spanning set.
Sartaj Ul Hasan (IIT Jammu) SMD002U1M 5 / 10
Summarizing Results about Dimension

Proposition 17: Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space with


dimension n. Then:
(a) Any subset of V which contains more than n elements is linearly
dependent.
(b) No subset of V which contains less than n vectors can span V .

Remark: Proposition 17 essentially summarizes Proposition 12 and its


consequences in terms of dimension.

Sartaj Ul Hasan (IIT Jammu) SMD002U1M 6 / 10


Dimension of Subspaces

Proposition 18: If W is a proper subspace of a finite-dimensional space


V , then W is also finite-dimensional and 0 < dim W < dim V .
(Note: A proper subspace is a subspace different from the zero subspace
and the entire space. )

Proof: Since W is a proper subspace, it contains a vector w1 6= 0. If w1


spans W , then W is finite-dimensional. If not, there is a vector w2 in W
outside Span w1 , and by adjoining w2 to w1 , we still have a linearly
independent set (by Proposition 14). Continuing in this way, we get a
basis of W with at most dim V elements (upper limit comes because of
Proposition 12). Hence, W is finite-dimensional and dim W ≤ dim V . But
since W is a proper subspace, there is a vector v outside W . Adjoining v
to any basis of W , we still have a linearly independent set. Hence, dim W
must be (strictly) less than dim V , i.e. dim W < dim V .

Sartaj Ul Hasan (IIT Jammu) SMD002U1M 7 / 10


Application of Proposition 18
Question: Is C [a, b], i.e. the space of continuous real-valued functions
defined on an arbitrary closed interval, finite-dimensional or
infinite-dimensional ?
Answer: Infinite-dimensional.
Proof: Suppose BWOC that C [a, b] is finite-dimensional. Now, consider
P[a, b], the set of polynomial functions with domain [a, b]. Clearly,
P[a, b] ⊆ C [a, b] since all polynomial functions are continuous.
Furthermore, it is easy to see that P[a, b] is actually a subspace of C [a, b].
At this stage, we recall the result that R[t] is infinite-dimensional. R[t]
and P[a, b] are not exactly the same space, but they are very similar. So
the proof that R[t] is infinite-dimensional can be applied to P[a, b] with
minor modifications to show that P[a, b] is infinite dimensional. But by
Proposition 18, any subspace of a finite-dimensional vector space must be
finite-dimensional. This is a contradiction. Hence, C [a, b] must be
infinite-dimensional.

Sartaj Ul Hasan (IIT Jammu) SMD002U1M 8 / 10


Additional Notes about P[a, b]
The importance of P[a, b] follows from the following deep result:
Weierstrass Approximation Theorem: Let f ∈ C [a, b] and let any  > 0
be given. Then, there exists a polynomial function p(x) ∈ P[a, b] such
that the distance between p(X ) and f (x) is less than , i.e.
|p(x) − f (x)| <  for all x ∈ [a, b].
Remarks: The above is very useful both in the theory and in practical
applications since polynomials are easy to calculate with. Recall Taylor’s
Theorem:
0 h2 00 hn
f (a + h) = f (a) + hf (a) + f (a) + · · · + f n ()a + Remainder Term.
2! n!
This can be used to determine the approximating polynomial provided two
conditions hold:
(i) f (x) is not just continuous but also has derivatives of all orders, i.e.
f ∈ C ∞ [a, b].
(ii) The Remainder Term converges to 0 as n → ∞ (for small h).
Sartaj Ul Hasan (IIT Jammu) SMD002U1M 9 / 10
Additional Notes about P[a, b] (Cont’d)

Though we can find functions f ∈ C ∞ [a, b], which do not satisfy (ii)
above, many of the functions found in practice, such as exponential,
/ C ∞ [a, b] but
trigonometric, etc do not satisfy (ii). Of course, if f ∈
f ∈ C [a, b], we can use Weierstrass Approximation Theorem directly.

Sartaj Ul Hasan (IIT Jammu) SMD002U1M 10 / 10

You might also like