Final Thesis On SMV

ESTABLISHING STANDARD MINUTE VALUE FOR CUTTING
SECTION IN EMD GARMENT COMPANY
BY:
1.MEBRAHTU G/HER
2.SEMERE ALEM
3. SELEMAWIT AREGAWI
ETHIOPIAN INSTITUTE OF TEXTILE AND FASHON

TECHNOLOGY
BAHIR DAR UNIVERSITY
BAHIR DAR, ETHIOPIA
2017
ESTABLISHING STANDARD MINUTE VALUE FOR CUTTING
SECTION IN EMD GARMENT COMPANY
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of
Bachelor of Science in Garment Engineering
BY:
1.MEBRAHTU G/HER
2.SEMERE ALEM
3. SELEMAWIT AREGAWI
Under the Guidance of

Mrs.Ambika Babu
ETHIOPIAN INSTITUTE OF TEXTILE AND FASHON

TECHNOLOGY
BAHIR DAR UNIVERSITY

BAHIR DAR, ETHIOPIA
June, 2017
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY
We hereby certify that we are the sole author of this thesis and that no part of this thesis has been
published or submitted for publication.
We certify that, to the best of the knowledge, this thesis does not infringe upon anyone’s
copyright nor violate any proprietary rights and that of any ideas, techniques, quotations, or any
other material from the work of other people included in this thesis, published or otherwise, are
fully acknowledged in accordance with the standard referencing practices. Furthermore, to the
extent that we have included copyrighted material that surpasses the bounds of fair dealing
within the meaning of the Copyright Act, we certify that we have obtained a written permission
from the copyright include such material in this thesis.
We declare that this is a true copy of our thesis, including any final revisions, as approved by our
thesis committee and that this thesis has not been submitted for a higher degree to any other
University or Institution.
MEBRAHTU G/HER ________________

SEMERE ALEM ________________
SELEMAWIT AREGAWI ________________
Student Name Signature
i
APPROVAL BY ADVISOR
To the best of knowledge and as understood by the student in the Research Integrity and
Copyright Disclaimer, this thesis/project Establishing Standard Minute Value for Cutting Section
in EMD Garment Company adheres to the provisions of guidelines, policies and legislations of
the Ethiopian Textile and Fashion Institute of Technology during their research work and use of
copyrighted material. The thesis is complete and can be presented to the thesis evaluation
committee or juries.
_________________________ ____________________
Advisor’s Name Signature
ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Firstly, we would like to thanks GOD for his endless helping from the beginning to the end.
Special thanks deserve to EiTEX, Bahir Dar University, University Industry Linkage office,
garment Engineering Department and Instructor our counselor, for giving this opportunity that
make us to have a better knowledge about Research and Innovation.
It is also our honor and pleasure to thank to Mr Melkamu Beyene (Production Manager of EMD
garment company) for creating better opportunity for collecting data’s and guidance.
Lastly we would like to thank our academic advisor Mrs. Ambika who gave us a great full
advice for the success of our project.
iii
ABSTRACT
The productivity in garment sector depends on many factors: time, employees and machine.
Time is very important factor that control the productivity of garment sector in return product on
time. In garment sector to make the shipment in exact time it is very necessary to set a target for
cutting department. The total work of the cutting department is completed by different operator.
So without a standard time and target it is impossible to reach the goal. To set a standard target
time which is mandatory. This project thesis represents the time study method used in garment
sector. By making the time an assumption of total time needed for any particular product or
garment can be made, that is really important to make the delivery of the product to the buyer on
exact time and to calculate the wage of operator, costs of product, daily line target, operator
efficiency, cost per minuets, line efficiency and individual line target.
Key word: - EMD garment company, cutting department, standard minute value.
Contents
iv
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY.........................................................................................i
ACKNOWLEDGMENT..............................................................................................................iii
ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................................iv
List of tables.................................................................................................................................vii
List of figures..............................................................................................................................viii
CHAPTER-1..................................................................................................................................1
1. Introduction................................................................................................................................1
1.1. Background and justification............................................................................................2
1.2. Statement of the problem......................................................................................................3
1.3. Objective..................................................................................................................................4
1.3.1. General objective...............................................................................................................4
1.3.1. Specific Objectives............................................................................................................4
1.4. Significance of the study.........................................................................................................4
1.4.1. Benefits of the study..........................................................................................................4
1.4.1. Beneficiaries of the study...................................................................................................4
1.5. Scope........................................................................................................................................4
1.6. Limitation of this project.......................................................................................................4
CHAPTER-2..................................................................................................................................5
2.1. Literature review....................................................................................................................5
2.1.1. Introduction Cutting room.................................................................................................5
2.1.2. Predetermined Time Standards (PTS)................................................................................7
2.1.3. Method of calculation........................................................................................................8
2.1.4. SAM and Lead Time in Production Planning..................................................................10
CHAPTER-3................................................................................................................................11
3.1. Methodology..........................................................................................................................11
3.1.1. Primary Data Collection...................................................................................................12
3.1.1.1. Direct Observation....................................................................................................12
3.1.2. Secondary Data Collection...............................................................................................12
3.1.3. Data Presentation and Analysis........................................................................................12
CHAPTER FOUR.......................................................................................................................33
4.1. RESULT AND DISCUSSION.............................................................................................33
CHAPTER FIVE.........................................................................................................................34
v
5.1. CONCLUSION.....................................................................................................................34
REFERENCES............................................................................................................................35
Appendix I....................................................................................................................................36
vi
List of table
Table 1. Available machines in E.M.D Company...........................................................................1

Table 2 operation breakdown of suit............................................................................................12
Table 3 Rating Scale......................................................................................................................15
Table 4 rating operators...............................................................................................................16
Table 5-time study for spreading...................................................................................................17
Table 6-time study for marker making..........................................................................................18
Table 7-time study for cutting trouser...........................................................................................19
Table 8-time study for cutting jacket.............................................................................................20
Table 9-time study for fusing.........................................................................................................21
Table 10-time study for placement marking..................................................................................22
Table 11-time study for interlining inserting................................................................................23
Table 12-time study for re cutting.................................................................................................25
Table 13-time study for re numbering...........................................................................................26
Table 14-time study for bundling..................................................................................................26
Table 15-time study for final.........................................................................................................27
Table 16- Capacity Planning for Cutting Operation....................................................................28
Table 17 Production of suit..........................................................................................................33
vii
List of figure
Figure 1 methodology of the project.............................................................................................11
viii
List of Symbols and Abbreviations
 EMD= elias Mohamed debella
 SAM = standard allowed minute
 SMV = standard minute value
 GSD= general sewing data
 MIN = minute
 PTS =Predetermined Time Standards
 PFD=personal, fatigue, delay
ix
CHAPTER-1
1. Introduction
E.M.D garment industry is one of the privately owned company established and registered in
April 1996 G.C under the commercial laws of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. It is
found in Addis Ababa around Mekanisa near to Ethiopian gumruk Gebiwoch bale siltan. The
initial capital of the company is around 1,453,000 Ethiopian birr. The placement of the company
covered on the area of 1500m2.The Company produces the products mainly for local markets.
The company mainly produces men’s suit and occasionally produces women’s suit clothes using
woven fabrics.
Available machines in E.M.D Company

Table 1. Available Machines in E.M.D Company
No_ Machines Brand Quantity

1 Spreading table with end cutter 1
2 Straight cutting knife 3
3 Round knife cutting machine 6
4 Band knife 1
5 Fusing machine 1
6 Steam ironing machine 11
7 SNLS JUKI 12
8 SNLS BROTHER 10
9 SNLS TYIPICAL 3
10 2 needle lock stitch JAPS 1
12 Over lock Juki 2
13 Zigzag stitch Juki 2
14 Zigzag stitch Shshng 1
15 Form pressing machine with Miglor 3
steam coat
16 Form pressing machine with Miglor 4
steam trouser
17 Button hole maker Shshng 2
18 Button attach Brother 2
19 Bar tack Shshng 2
20 Blind stich Miglor 2
Cover stitch JAPS 1
21
1
1.1. Background and justification
At present in the garment industry cutting process time is calculated using analytical estimating
and mainly based on management decisions. Based on this calculated cutting times of garments
lay planning and costing for the cutting process is done. This value has to be accurate because
otherwise lay plan will not tally with the plan of the production department. Then the cutting
department will be unable to provide the required cut panels to the production modules in time. It
is important to have an accurate system to calculate cutting process time in order to have a
smooth flow of the work in the cutting department and also in the production department.
It is difficult to calculate the efficiency level of operators in the cutting department due to non-
availability of accurate values for cutting times for garments. Currently in the industry,
incentives are not given to cutting operators based on their actual efficiency levels due to lack of
proper system to calculate cutting times. Therefore, when it comes to developing incentive
schemes for cutting operators knowing accurate values for cutting time is important. Further the
through- put time of the cutting department is calculated using analytical estimating. Having an
accurate system to calculate the cutting process will be useful for costing as well.
2
1.2. Statement of the problem
Monitoring cutting room efficiency is not done effectively in EMD Garment Company, however,
many times poor work supply from the Cutting Room causes major production losses, such as it
causes the difficulty to know the cost of piece rate accurately due to this it is also uncertain to
calculate target capacity for a specific style. Although there is an improper balance between cutting
and sewing sections as a result of the estimation planning. It is essential to factory performance that
the cutting room is intelligently managed and controlled and this will be greatly enhancing if
times can be established for all of the operations required in each order.
Since sewing section process done after cutting section activity finish so, delaying in cutting
section also affect the process of sewing section this problem mainly affects the delivery time of
the product these made as, engagement with customer satisfaction. Cutting SAM is one which
minimizes this delaying problem. SMV used for benefit of company to set line target and
efficiency level, to analyze cost and profit.
Preparing SMV between cutting sections also have great role in maintaining a uniform flow of
production. Having standard minute value on cutting section is the main part of any production
firm to improve their productivity and to deliver on time. Even though there are modern
machines, highly qualified workers and good management system in the company the
productivity of the firm will be highly affected if there is no standard minute value on cutting
section.
3
1.3. Objective
1.3.1. General objective
 To Establishing standard minute value for cutting section in EMD garment company
1.3.1. Specific Objectives
 To record SMV for all cutting operation

 To set cutting capacity for each operation
1.4. Significance of the study
1.4.1. Benefits of the study
 Increase efficiency of cutting room and fulfill the requirement of sewing room
 Utilize available resource in cutting room
 Increase competitiveness of the garment sectors
 Avoid overtime cost and reduce daily losses
 Increase accurate planning and scheduling system
 Reduce idle time in cutting and sewing room
 Use maximum capacity of the cutting room machineries
1.4.1. Beneficiaries of the study
 EMD Garment Company - Because they get the standardized time for their work
 Employer-Get incentive and gift from the company, also improve their ability
 EiTEX- Since we are the families of EITEX so, this project advertises the institute for
sample company
 other researchers -Use this data as secondary data for other research
1.5. Scope
The project focuses only on establishing standard minute value on cutting section for suit in
EMD garment company.
1.6. Limitation of this project

Lack of full information regarding to standard minute value on cutting section and documented
file that relates to cutting time while we do this project.
4
CHAPTER-2
2.1. Literature review
2.1.1. Introduction Cutting room
Herald Carr & Barbaral Latham (January 2006) “Cutting is considered to be the most important
operation in apparel manufacturing because firstly, it handles the costliest material resource – the
fabric. Secondly, the spreading and cutting process is irreversible; the concept of repair or
alteration does not work here. Further, and most importantly, due to over-emphasis on measuring
sewing department performance, there is a sheer neglect of measuring the spreading, cutting and
planning performance. Still due to overemphasis on the sewing floor, there is sheer neglect in
measuring various critical aspects of both the spreading and cutting departments. The measures
discussed would surely serve as a stepping stone for an apparel manufacturer.
Cutting room operation and process flow
Pattern / Marker: According to the design and fit, patterns of different garment parts are made
on the pattern paper and cut into pattern pieces. For manual marker these pattern pieces are used
for marker making. On the other hand, in CAD system patterns are made in computer.
Later using a plotter markers are made on sheet. In the second case cutting department receive
ready marker.
Cut ratio receiving: Prior to cutting, cutting department get a job sheet from planning
department or merchandiser or production manager that includes total quantity of garment pieces
to be cut, sizes ratio of the garments and color-wise size break up. According to the size and
color ratio cutting team prepare one marker or multiple markers. Marker length and number of
lay to be cut are planned in this stage.
Fabric receiving: Fabric requirement for an order is calculated according to the average
consumption of the fabric from the marker. In case of multiple color order, color wise
requirement is made. Fabric department issue fabric to cutting against the fabric requirement
(generally requisition slip is used).
5
Fabric relaxation: This process is optional. Specially used for knits fabric. During rolling of
fabric it gets stretched. So it is essential to bring the fabric on stable form otherwise garment
would shrink after making. To relax the fabric, roll or than is opened and spread and kept for
about 24 hours.
Spreading (Fabric Layering): In this stage fabric sheet is layered one above another
maintaining pre-defined maker length and correct ply tension. Fabric is layered up to a certain
height to avoid cutting quality problem. Spreading is done by manual layering or automatic
layering machine can be used. During layering of the fabric, fabric edge is aligned at one side.
Marker Making: After layering of a lay, pre made paper patterns (or ready markers made by
plotter) are placed on the top layer of the lay. In manual marker making, marking is done around
each pattern shape using marking chalk. This process is called as marker making. In a marker all
garment components are placed.
Cutting: Lay is cut following the marked lines on the top of the lay. Cutting is done using
straight knife or other cutting machine. In cutting process garment component are separated. On
the basis of pattern shape different cutting method/ machine are selected.
Numbering: Separated garment components are numbered to ensure that in stitching all
components from same layer are stitched together. It is important to avoid shade variation in a
garment. Between the cutting and sewing processes cut components may be passed through other
processes like printing and embroidery. There is maximum chance of mixing of the components.
If there is layer number in each component, then at the time of stitching only correct components
will be stitched together.
Sorting: According to production system (Make through, progressive bundle or one-piece flow
system) cut components are sorted. In sorting all component of a garment placed together. Size
wise sorting and in case multiple colors are cut in a single lay, color wise sorting will be
required.
Bundling: As per the production line requirement a certain number of pieces with all component
are tied together. This process is known as bundling. Each bundle is marked with bundle number,
style name and size number.
6
Standard time
Naresh Paneru (November2003) Time study is a method of measuring work for recording the
times of performing a certain specific task or its elements carried out under specified conditions.
Time study help to define how much time is necessary for an operator to carry out the task at a
defined rate of performance.
In industrial engineering, the standard time is the time required by an average skilled operator,
working at a normal pace, to perform a specified task using a prescribed method. It includes
appropriate allowances to allow the person to recover from fatigue and, additional allowance to
cover contingent elements which may occur but have not been observed. Standard Time (also
referred to as the “Standard Minute Value” or “SMV”), is the time required for a qualified
worker working at “Standard Performance” to perform a given task. The SMV includes
additional allowances for Rest and Relaxation, Machine Delay and anticipated Contingencies.
Prasanta Sarkar (November2005), The SMV is the universal measurement of time and its
accuracy and consistency is essential as the foundation for measurement and organization of key
business processes such as Production Targets, Line Balancing, Production Planning, Incentive
Schemes, and the quantification of Operator Performance and Factory Efficiency. Establishing a
precise SMV can, however, be extremely difficult when using traditional methods of work
measurement.
This is because production workers are neither robots nor machines, and do not work at a
constant rate throughout the working day. Shahidul kader (September 2012)
2.1.2. Predetermined Time Standards (PTS)
Mausmi Ambastha (September 2012) A PTS system establishes Basic Time, to which is added
agreed allowances for Rest and Relaxation, Machine Delay and Contingency, thereby providing
“Standard Time” for any given process. PTS are used to construct Standard Time at a variety of
levels – macro, operation, feature and product – and form the foundation of Industrial
Engineering practices and Costing procedures.
7
Latest production scheduling systems like line balancing system and performance measuring
systems use SAM as one of the primary parameters.
Naresh Paneru (November2003) as he said the standard time can be determined using the
following techniques
1. Time study,
2. Predetermined motion time system aka PMTS or PTS,
3. Standard data system,
4. Work sampling.
2.1.3. Method of calculation
The Standard Time is the product of three factors:

1. Observed time: The time measured to complete the task.
2. Performance rating factor: The pace the person is working at. 90% is working slower
than normal, 110% is working faster than normal, 100% is normal. This factor is
calculated by an experienced worker who is trained to observe and determine the rating.
3. Personal, fatigue, and delay (PFD) allowance.
The standard time can then be calculated by using:
STANDARDTIME=(OBSERVED TIME)( RATING FACTOR)(1+ PFD ALLOWANCE)
Naresh Paneru (November2003) The major advantages of PTS are that they enable the user to
pre-determine Standard Time (and therefore cost) for a given manufacturing process – even
before production has begun - and they offer speed, accuracy and consistency in establishing
such data.
Moreover, PTS also facilitate the comparison of one method to another, thereby promoting
improvements in productivity and a focus on continuous improvement.
A well-structured PTS – such as GSD – will consist of PTS data, related software, professional
training and formal Certification – the latter to ensure a high and acceptable standard of data
8
application. It will simultaneously provide multi-level data blocks enabling the user to focus on
high level data for speed and consistency in Costing, whilst also allowing access to lower level
data for Industrial Engineering practices and productivity gains.
Time Study Tools
To do time study we need to arrange following tools
 A stop watch
 Time study format
 One pen or pencil
 Time Study board
How to Conduct Time Study?
An operation cycle consists of material handling, positioning and aligning parts, cutting garment
parts and tying & untying a bundle. So in the time study format, divide whole task into various
elements according to the motion sequences of the operation.
Step 1: Preparation
 Arrange stationery like time study format, stop watch (digital one) and pencil
 Select one operation for Time study
 Tell the operator that you are going measure time he/she taking to do the job.
Step 2: Record Time
Now measure the time taken for completing each elements of the operation cycle by the operator.
Time should be captured in seconds. Similarly, capture element timing for consecutive 5
operation cycles. During data capturing note down reading of the stop watch and later calculate
element timing. If you found any abnormal time in any elements record time during time study
and later discard that reading. Ignore those from the calculation of standard time.
Step 3: Calculation of Basic Time
From the Reading (R) calculates time taken for each element for all five cycles just by deducting
previous Reading from elemental reading. Sum up times of five cycles for each element. Note, if
9
you discard any reading than in that case no. of cycles will be four. Calculate average element
times. This average time is called basic time.
Step 4: Calculation of Standard Time
To convert basic time (cycle time) into normal time you have to multiply it with operator
performance rating. Here for calculation rating is considered as 100%. So, Cycle time and
normal is same in this example.
Add allowances to normal time (machine allowances, fatigue and personal needs etc.). Add
machine allowance only to those elements where machine is running and fatigue and personal
needs to all elements (approx. 20%). machine allowances are shown in the time study sheet.
The calculated time (Normal time + Allowance time) is standard time for each element in
seconds. Sum up all elemental time and convert seconds into minutes. This is standard minutes
or SAM (Standard Allowed Minute)
2.1.4. SAM and Lead Time in Production Planning
As Mausmi Ambastha (September 2012) In production planning, lead time is very important.
Suppose, a product is made from material B and material C. Material B is made from material C.
It means, if there is delay in producing or sourcing material C, there will be delay in getting
material B. So, there will be delay in the production of product A. Customer will not get delivery
in time. So, deadline is fixed for getting supply and production simultaneously.
Conclusion
Cutting is considered to be the most important operation in apparel manufacturing because, it

handles the costliest material resource such as the fabric. Therefore, cutting room requires proper
planning and scheduling.
10
Standard time is very important for cutting room in order to get standard time for the case of
effective production planning and scheduling.
CHAPTER-3
3.1. Methodology
This study aimed at establishing standard minute value for cutting section in EMD garment
company. Both qualitative and quantitative research methods were used. Quantitative method
gave measurable data like the company’s monthly & daily recorded information.
Literature review
Data collection
Primary data Secondary data
Observation Written document Internet
Data Presentation and Analysis
Establish standard time for suit
To set cutting capacity for each operation
Result & Discussion
Figure 1 Methodology of the Project Thesis
11
3.1.1. Primary Data Collection
3.1.1.1. Direct Observation

A method of collecting and recording data by direct observation of activities, situation, working
condition, and operator performance. By using this data collection method, we had an
information about EMD garment companies for operators to measure the time of the workers
spent while fulfilling the cutting operation during cutting process by observing for a week.
Currently the company uses those allowances : Personal 11%, fatigue 8%, and delay 6% (PFD)
allowance.
3.1.2. Secondary Data Collection
Secondary data was collected from

 Document of company
 Internet access
3.1.3. Data Presentation and Analysis
Operation breaks down for suit
12
Table 2 Operation Breakdown of Cutting Suit
STANDARD TIME STUDY SHEET

project number 1919 style typesuit number of plys 40
marker pcs 2 cut quantity80 customer jovani
TIME STUDY FOR SPREADING
Company name EMD GARMENT cycle times
activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total time
main fabric spreding 1 manual 1.35 1.32 1.29 1.32 1.28 1.3 1.32 1.29 1.32 1.29 1.34 1.29 1.3 1.34 1.35 19.7
interling spreeding 1 manual 1.58 1.54 1.59 1.59 1.57 1.58 1.55 1.57 1.58 1.54 1.57 1.55 1.59 1.57 1.55 23.52
linning spreeding 1 manual 1.32 1.33 1.32 1.31 1.3 1.29 1.32 1.31 1.33 1.29 1.33 1.32 1.33 1.29 1.33 19.72
canvase spreeding 1 manual 1.32 1.28 1.26 1.28 1.27 1.26 1.28 1.3 1.29 1.32 1.31 1.29 1.28 1.31 1.3 19.35
marker pcs 2 cut quantity 80 customer jovani
TIME STUDY FOR MARKER MAKING
2 manual(48)5.18 5.15 5.14 5.15 5.14 5.16 5.18 5.17 5.18 5.16 5.17 5.15 5.14 5.16 5.17 77.4
marker making 46 5.12 5.14 5.13 5.15 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.12 5.13 5.15 5.12 5.14 5.15 5.14 5.13 77.01
13
TIME STUDY FOR CUTTING TROUSER
activity No oper M/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total time
FRONT PANNEL 1 S.KNIFE 1.23 1.15 1.18 1.22 1.17 1.2 1.23 1.23 1.19 1.15 1.18 1.21 1.23 1.15 1.16 5.69
frONT PANNEL linning S.KNIFE 1.11 1.09 1.08 1.06 1.11 1.06 1.09 1.11 1.08 1.09 1.11 1.09 1.08 1.1 1.09 16.35
BACK PANNEL S.KNIFE 1.12 1.13 1.11 1.12 1.1 1.12 1.08 1.12 1.09 1.11 1.1 1.1 1.12 1.14 1.15 5.57
FLY S.KNIFE 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.36 0.38 0.32 0.38 0.36 0.32 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.33 0.3 1.73
patelet S.KNIFE 0.44 0.46 0.45 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.47 0.46 0.48 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.46 0.45 0.42 6.75
WAST BANAND S.KNIFE 0.45 0.5 0.43 0.46 0.42 0.46 0.5 0.48 0.46 0.49 0.5 0.51 0.46 0.5 0.42 2.17
waST AND interlining S.KNIFE 0.42 0.42 0.45 0.42 0.45 0.43 0.42 0.45 0.41 0.45 0.45 0.44 0.42 0.41 0.39 2.1
wast band LINNING S.KNIFE 0.5 0.52 0.5 0.49 0.51 0.49 0.52 0.49 0.52 0.48 0.49 0.52 0.5 0.49 0.49 2.5
POCKET BAG S.KNIFE 0.9 0.78 0.8 0.82 0.69 0.75 0.68 0.7 0.74 0.77 0.8 0.78 0.81 0.85 0.79 4.09
POCKET FLY S.KNIFE 0.2 0.19 0.2 0.21 0.2 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.2 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.22 1.07
POCKET LIP S.KNIFE 0.23 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.2 0.19 0.22 0.18 0.2 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.19 0.21 1.01
welt pocket S.KNIFE 0.18 0.16 0.17 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.19 0.16 2.5
welt pocket inter lining S.KNIFE 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.26 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.2 0.21 3.6
welt pocket linng S.KNIFE 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.27 0.29 0.31 0.3 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.31 4.51
TIME STUDY FOR CUTTING JACKRT
company name EMD GARMENT cycle times
activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15total time
FRONT PANNEL 3 S.KNIFE 0.35 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.31 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 4.9
FRONT PANNE L interling 0.38 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.37 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 5.62
FRONT PANNEL lining 0.41 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 6.42
BACK PANNEL S.KNIFE 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.56 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 8.04
baCK PANNEL interlining 0.58 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.6 8.76
back pannel lining 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.09 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 16.35
PRIENCES S.KNIFE 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.58 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 8.74
PRIENCES interlinning 1.1 0.1 1.1 1.1 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.15 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 16.92
PRIENCES linning 0.59 0.6 0.6 1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.56 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 16.21
UPPER SLEEVE S.KNIFE 0.48 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.48 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 6.71
UPPER SLEEVE interlining 0.58 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.56 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 8.38
UPPER SLEEVE linning 0.57 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.55 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 8.27
UNDER SLEEVE interlining S.KNIFE 0.53 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.48
UNDER SLEEVE 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.53 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 8.13
UNDER SLEEVE 0.42 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 6.69
sleeve canvas 0.34 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.34 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 5.02
COLLAR S.KNIFE 0.54 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.53 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 7.75
COLLAR linning 0.58 0.6 1 0.6 0.6 1 1 0.6 0.6 0.57 1 0.6 0.6 0.6 1 8.23
COLLAR DAND S.KNIFE 0.41 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.03
collar bannd linning 0.39 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 6.1
POCKET FLAP S.KNIFE 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.24 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.3
SHOULDER PAD B.KNIFE 0.33 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.28
lappels S.KNIFE 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 7.8
lappels interlining 0.56 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.54 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.79
lappels linning 0.45 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.46 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 6.3
canvase 0.54 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.57 0.6 1 0.6 0.5 0.6 8.4
side pannel decoretives 0.32 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.28 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 4.35
chest pocket ling 0.25 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.28 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 4.12
welt pocket 0.21 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.22 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.17
welt pocket linng 0.29 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0..29 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.27 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 4.08
14
TIME STUDY FOR FUSSING
1 fusing m/c0.32 0.31 0.28 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.29 0.27 0.31 0.29 0.28 0.29 0.31 0.3 0.29 4.44
0.32 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.28 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.3 0.29 4.60
long pannel 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.3 0.32 0.31 0.3 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.32 0.31 0.3 4.59
AVERAGE
0.15 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.16 1.28
small pannal 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.14 1.17
0.14 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.16 1.13
TIME STUDY FOR PLACEMENT MARKING
J.pocket placement 1 manual 0.56 0.54 0.58 0.55 0.57 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.54 0.56 0.55 0.58 0.54 0.57 0.55 3.21
marking 0.54 0.58 0.59 0.55 0.56 0.58 0.57 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.55 0.58 0.57 0.55 0.55 3.21
0.32 0.35 0.34 0.3 0.34 0.32 0.33 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.34 0.3 0.35 0.36 0.33 2.11
tr.pocket placement marking 0.33 0.31 0.35 0.32 0.33 0.32 0.34 0.31 0.35 0.31 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.32 0.31 2.02
TIME STUDY FOR INTERLININIG INSERTING
3 manual 0.42 0.45 0.41 0.4 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.4 0.42 0.41 0.44 0.46 6.33
long componet 0.48 0.43 0.46 0.42 0.42 0.44 0.43 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.41 6.51
0.15 0.17 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.16 6.51
0.18 0.19 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.18 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.15 2.41
short component
TIME STUDY FOR RE-CUTTING
activity No operM/C cycle times total time
FRONT PANNEL 3 S.KNIFE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
BACK PANNEL S.KNIFE 0.55 0.58 0.57 0.55 0.55 1.03 1 0.55 0.59 1.03 0.57 0.58 0.59 1.03 0.57 10.34
PRIENCES S.KNIFE 0.56 0.54 0.55 0.54 0.56 0.57 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.57 0.55 0.54 0.57 0.56 0.54 8.35
UPPER SLEEVE S.KNIFE 0.45 0.48 0.47 0.48 0.5 0.48 0.42 0.51 0.48 0.5 0.42 0.45 0.42 0.5 0.49 7.05
UNDER SLEEVE S.KNIFE 0.48 0.55 0.57 0.56 0.55 0.58 0.54 0.57 0.55 0.55 0.57 0.54 0.52 0.57 0.59 8.29
COLLAR S.KNIFE 0.47 0.45 0.48 0.46 0.45 0.47 0.48 0.45 0.45 0.48 0.49 0.44 0.48 0.46 0.43 6.94
COLLAR DAND S.KNIFE 0.32 0.33 0.29 0.31 0.33 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.28 0.33 0.32 0.34 0.29 0.34 0.28 4.69
POCKET FLAP S.KNIFE 0.16 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.18 2.83
SHOULDER PAD B.KNIFE 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.24 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.25 0.26 0.24 0.25 3.54
lappels S.KNIFE 0.56 0.58 1 0.59 0.58 0.57 0.59 1 1.01 0.58 0.58 1 1 0.59 0.55 10.78
front trouser 0.1 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.14 1.9
back trouser 0.48 0.48 0.49 0.45 0.47 0.46 0.44 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.47 0.46 0.45 0.46 0.46 6.98
welt pockets 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.22 0.24 0.2 0.22 0.21 0.23 0.2 0.22 0.21 0.22 0.25 0.24 3.33
TIME STUDY FOR NUMBERING
1 0.35 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.33 0.34 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.34 0.37 0.35 2.14
numbering 0.32 0.33 0.35 0.34 0.32 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.37 0.39 0.37 2.16
TIME STUDY FOR BUNDLING
cutting bundeling 2 2.15 2.1 2.08 2.13 2.14 2.1 2.11 2.14 2.1 2.13 2.12 2.15 2.12 2.11 2.15 31.83
insert bundeling 1.05 1 1.02 1 1.02 1.04 1.03 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.02 1 1.02 1.03 15.34
fussing bundeling 0.41 0.41 0.42 0.4 0.41 0.4 0.43 0.42 0.41 0.39 0.42 0.42 0.4 0.39 0.39 6.12
final bundeling 1.52 1.48 1.49 0.5 0.51 0.51 0.52 0.51 0.53 0.51 0.54 0.53 0.52 1.51 1.54 12.72
15
Rating Scale
Table 3 Rating Scale
0 – 100(Std) Description Mi/hr Km / hr
0 No activity
Very slow; clumsy, fumbling movements; operative

50 2 3.2
appears half asleep, with no interest in the job
Steady, deliberate, unhurried performance, as of a

worker not on piece work but under proper
75 3 4.8
supervision; looks slow, but time is not being
intentionally wasted while under observation
Standard rating
Brisk, business-like performance, as of an average
100 4 6.4
qualified worker on piece work; necessary standard of
quality and accuracy achieved with confidence
Very fast; operator exhibits a high degree of

125 assurance, dexterity and coordination of movement, 5 8.0
well above that of an average trained worker.
Exceptionally fast; requires intense effort and

concentration, and is unlikely to be kept up for long
150 6 9.6
periods; a “virtuoso” performance achieved only by a
few outstanding workers.
16
Study of the operator’s performance rating
Table 4 Rating Operators
standard time study sheet

project 1919 style type number ofsuit 40
number ply’s

marker pcs 2 cut quantity 80 customer Jovan
i
PERFORMANCE RATING OF OPERATERS
Company EMD GARMENT
name

Activity No M/C RATING (%)
operator Average RATING (%)
s
Spreading 4 manual 70 6 72 7 70
8 0
marker 2 manual 7 70 71
making 2
cutting for 1 straight 6 65
trouser knife 5
cutting for 3 straight 6 70 6 65
jacket knife 5 0
Fussing 1 Fussing 7 72
m/c 2
placement 1 manual 7 73
marking 3
interlining 3 manual 7 72
inserting 2
Re-cutting 3 hand 7 71 6 71
scissors 4 8
Numbering 1 manual 7 74
4
Bundling 2 manual 6 72 70
8
TOTAL 21
17
SPREADING SMV
Spreading time is vary depending on layer length (and/or number of markers) and type of fabric.
To be specific record spreading SAM based on lay length and fabric type. Spreading time studies
and measure cycle time for fabric spreading. Then this study converts cycle time into standard
time. Once the researcher had standard minutes for spreading of a layer, and then can easily
calculate total time required for spreading a lay by multiplying number of layers in a lay.
Table 5-Time Study for Spreading for Suit

activity No oper M/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total timeav. Time%rating %allo. SMV
main fabric spreding 4 manual 1.35 1.32 1.29 1.32 1.28 1.3 1.32 1.29 1.32 1.29 1.34 1.29 1.3 1.34 1.35 19.7 1.31 70% 25% 1.15
interling spreeding manual 1.58 1.54 1.59 1.59 1.57 1.58 1.55 1.57 1.58 1.54 1.57 1.55 1.59 1.57 1.55 23.52 1.57 70% 25% 1.37
linning spreeding manual 1.32 1.33 1.32 1.31 1.3 1.29 1.32 1.31 1.33 1.29 1.33 1.32 1.33 1.29 1.33 19.72 1.31 70% 25% 1.15
canvase spreeding manual 1.32 1.28 1.26 1.28 1.27 1.26 1.28 1.3 1.29 1.32 1.31 1.29 1.28 1.31 1.3 19.35 1.29 70% 25% 1.13
SUM 4.80
Given Required
Average Observed time for main fabric spreading=1.31MIN SMV?
Rating=70%
Allowance = 25%
Solution
Basic time =observed time X performance rating
= 1.31MIN X 70%
=0.917MIN
SMV= Basic time (1+Allowance)
=0.917MIN (1+25%)
=1.15MIN
SMV per piece for spreading= SUM time for spreading
18
Marker piece
=4.80MIN
2
SMV per piece for spreading= 2.40 MIN
MARKER MAKING SMV
Maker making required few minutes and compared to other cutting processes this time is
negligible. In case I determine marker making SAM and want to add in total cutting SAM,
It determine standard time in manual marking through time study. In manual marker making
time varies depending on garment components, garment size and number of markers.
Table 6-Time Study for Marker Making for Suit
project number 1919 style type suit number of plys 40
Company nameEMD GARMENT cycle times
activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total timeav. Time%rating %allo. smv
2 manual(48) 5.18 5.15 5.14 5.15 5.14 5.16 5.18 5.17 5.18 5.16 5.17 5.15 5.14 5.16 5.17 77.4 5.16 71% 25% 4.58
marker making 46 5.12 5.14 5.13 5.15 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.12 5.13 5.15 5.12 5.14 5.15 5.14 5.13 77.01 5.134 71% 25% 4.56
AVERAGE 4.57
Given required
Average Observed time for marker making (size 48) =5.16MIN SMV?
Rating=71%
Allowance=25%
Basic time=observed time X performance rating

= 5.16MIN X 71%
=3.663MIN
=3.663 MIN (1+25%)
=4.58 MIN
Average Observed time for marker making (size 46) =5.1313MIN
Rating=71%
Allowance=25%

= 5.1313MIN X 71%
19
=3.643MIN
=3.643MIN (1+25%)
=4.56MIN
Average time for marker making=size (48) + size (46)

2
Average time for marker making= 4.58 MIN +4.56MIN
2
Marker making SMV per piece =4.57 MIN
SMV per piece for Marker making = SUM time for Marker making = 4.57 MIN
Marker piece 2
SMV per piece for Marker making = 2.28 MIN
CUTTING SMV FOR TROUSER
Total cutting time of a lay will depend on garment components, linear length to be cut for
garment patterns, marker size and type of fabric. Cutting time also depends on cutting
equipment’s. I Study cutting time for all sizes in a lay and I find average SAM.
Table 7-Time Study for Cutting Trouser

activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total timeav. Time%rating%allo. smv
FRONT PANNEL 1 S.KNIFE 1.23 1.15 1.18 1.22 1.17 1.2 1.23 1.23 1.19 1.15 1.18 1.21 1.23 1.15 1.16 5.69 1.19 65% 25% 0.97
frONT PANNEL linning S.KNIFE 1.11 1.09 1.08 1.06 1.11 1.06 1.09 1.11 1.08 1.09 1.11 1.09 1.08 1.1 1.09 16.35 1.09 65% 25% 0.89
BACK PANNEL S.KNIFE 1.12 1.13 1.11 1.12 1.1 1.12 1.08 1.12 1.09 1.11 1.1 1.1 1.12 1.14 1.15 5.57 1.11 65% 25% 0.91
FLY S.KNIFE 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.36 0.38 0.32 0.38 0.36 0.32 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.33 0.3 1.73 0.35 65% 25% 0.28
patelet S.KNIFE 0.44 0.46 0.45 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.47 0.46 0.48 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.46 0.45 0.42 6.75 0.45 65% 25% 0.37
WAST BANAND S.KNIFE 0.45 0.5 0.43 0.46 0.42 0.46 0.5 0.48 0.46 0.49 0.5 0.51 0.46 0.5 0.42 2.17 0.47 65% 25% 0.38
waST AND interlining S.KNIFE 0.42 0.42 0.45 0.42 0.45 0.43 0.42 0.45 0.41 0.45 0.45 0.44 0.42 0.41 0.39 2.1 0.43 65% 25% 0.35
wast band LINNING S.KNIFE 0.5 0.52 0.5 0.49 0.51 0.49 0.52 0.49 0.52 0.48 0.49 0.52 0.5 0.49 0.49 2.5 0.50 65% 25% 0.41
POCKET BAG S.KNIFE 0.9 0.78 0.8 0.82 0.69 0.75 0.68 0.7 0.74 0.77 0.8 0.78 0.81 0.85 0.79 4.09 0.78 65% 25% 0.63
POCKET FLY S.KNIFE 0.2 0.19 0.2 0.21 0.2 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.189 0.19 0.2 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.22 1.07 0.20 65% 25% 0.16
POCKET LIP S.KNIFE 0.23 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.2 0.19 0.22 0.18 0.2 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.19 0.21 1.01 0.20 65% 25% 0.16
welt pocket S.KNIFE 0.18 0.16 0.17 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.19 0.16 2.5 0.17 65% 25% 0.14
welt pocket inter lining S.KNIFE 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.26 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.2 0.21 3.6 0.24 65% 25% 0.20
welt pocket linng S.KNIFE 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.27 0.29 0.31 0.3 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.31 4.51 0.30 65% 25% 0.24
SUM 6.07
20
Given Required
Average Observed time for Cutting front panel for trouser =1.19MIN SMV?
Rating=65%
Allowance=25%
= 1.19MIN X 65%
=0.7735MIN
=0.7735MIN (1+25%)
=0.97MIN
SMV per piece for cutting trouser = SUM time for cutting = 6.07MIN
Marker piece 2
SMV per piece for cutting trouser = 3.03 MIN
CUTTING SMV FOR JACKET
21
Total cutting time of a lay will depend on garment components, linear length to be cut for
garment patterns, marker size and type of fabric. Cutting time also depends on cutting
equipment’s. I Study cutting time for all sizes in a lay and I find average SAM. Cover all sizes in
Table 8-Time Study for Cutting Jacket
TIME STUDY FOR JACKET
activity No oper M/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15total timeav.time rate%%allowe smv
FRONT PANNE L interling 0.4 0.36 0.37 0.4 0.4 0.35 0.4 0.35 0.4 0.37 0.4 0.4 0.36 0.37 0.4 5.62 0.37 62% 25% 0.29
FRONT PANNEL lining 0.4 0.42 0.43 0.4 0.5 0.42 0.43 0.42 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.46 0.44 0.45 6.42 0.42 62% 25% 0.33
baCK PANNEL interlining 0.6 0.57 0.58 0.1 0.6 0.56 0.57 0.59 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.58 0.1 0.59 8.76 0.58 62% 25% 0.45
back pannel lining 1.1 1.06 1.05 1.1 1.1 1.05 1.08 1.09 1.1 1.09 1.1 1.1 1.09 1.08 1.09 16.35 1.09 62% 25% 0.84
PRIENCES S.KNIFE 0.1 0.57 0.58 0.6 0.1 0.58 0.59 0.1 0.6 0.58 0.6 0.6 0.59 0.1 0.1 8.74 0.58 62% 25% 0.45
PRIENCES interlinning 1.1 0.1 1.12 1.1 1 1.13 1.14 1.14 1.1 1.15 1.1 1.1 1.15 1.14 1.15 16.92 1.12 62% 25% 0.87
PRIENCES linning 0.6 0.56 0.59 1 0.6 0.59 0.58 0.58 0.6 0.56 0.6 0.6 0.57 0.56 0.58 16.21 1.00 62% 25% 0.78
UPPER SLEEVE S.KNIFE 0.5 0.45 0.44 0.5 0.5 0.44 0.47 0.48 0.5 0.48 0.4 0.5 0.45 0.46 0.46 6.71 0.45 62% 25% 0.35
UPPER SLEEVE interlining 0.6 0.56 0.57 0.6 0.6 0.54 0.57 0.58 0.5 0.56 0.6 0.6 0.57 0.59 0.56 8.38 0.57 62% 25% 0.44
UPPER SLEEVE linning 0.6 0.56 0.55 0.5 0.6 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.6 0.55 0.6 0.6 0.54 0.56 0.57 8.27 0.55 62% 25% 0.43
UNDER SLEEVE interlining S.KNIFE 0.5 0.45 0.48 0.5 0.5 0.48 0.52 0.48 0.5 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.48 0.52 0.5 2.48 0.50 62% 25% 0.38
UNDER SLEEVE 0.5 0.5 0.53 0.5 0.5 0.53 0.51 0.53 0.5 0.53 0.5 0.5 0.54 0.53 0.55 8.13 0.52 62% 25% 0.40
UNDER SLEEVE 0.4 0.45 0.47 0.4 0.5 0.44 0.45 0.46 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.5 0.45 0.43 0.49 6.69 0.45 62% 25% 0.35
sleeve canvas 0.3 0.32 0.35 0.3 0.3 0.35 0.33 0.32 0.4 0.34 0.3 0.3 0.32 0.34 0.35 5.02 0.33 62% 25% 0.26
COLLAR S.KNIFE 0.5 0.53 0.54 0.6 0.5 0.54 0.56 0.55 0.5 0.53 0.5 0.6 0.52 0.51 0.53 7.75 0.51 6% 25% 0.04
COLLAR linning 0.6 0.57 1.02 0.6 0.6 1 1.02 0.56 0.6 0.57 1 0.6 0.57 0.59 1.01 8.23 1.14 62% 25% 0.88
COLLAR DAND S.KNIFE 0.4 0.43 0.38 0.4 0.4 0.38 0.4 0.41 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.42 0.4 0.41 2.03 0.41 62% 25% 0.31
collar bannd linning 0.4 0.39 0.37 0.4 0.4 0.41 0.39 0.41 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.41 0.42 0.4 6.1 0.39 62% 25% 0.31
POCKET FLAP S.KNIFE 0.2 0.2 0.23 0.2 0.2 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.2 0.24 0.2 0.2 0.21 0.22 0.21 3.3 0.21 62% 25% 0.16
SHOULDER PAD B.KNIFE 0.3 0.42 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.41 0.38 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.41 0.37 0.36 2.28 0.38 62% 25% 0.29
lappels S.KNIFE 0.5 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.52 0.53 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.52 0.53 0.51 7.8 0.50 62% 25% 0.39
lappels interlining 0.6 0.54 0.55 0.5 0.6 0.52 0.53 0.51 0.5 0.54 0.5 0.6 0.54 0.53 0.55 0.79 0.52 62% 25% 0.40
lappels linning 0.5 0.47 0.46 0.5 0.5 0.46 0.48 0.47 0.5 0.46 0.5 0.5 0.48 0.48 0.47 6.3 1.32 62% 25% 1.02
canvase 0.5 0.58 0.59 0.6 0.6 0.58 0.59 0.56 0.6 0.57 0.6 1 0.59 0.54 0.56 8.4 0.56 62% 25% 0.43
side pannel decoretives 0.3 0.33 0.28 0.3 0.3 0.28 0.27 0.3 0.3 0.28 0.3 0.3 0.28 0.31 0.29 4.35 0.29 62% 25% 0.23
chest pocket ling 0.3 0.28 0.29 0.3 0.3 0.26 0.29 0.28 0.3 0.28 0.3 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.29 4.12 0.27 62% 25% 0.21
welt pocket 0.2 0.22 0.19 0.2 0.2 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.2 0.22 0.2 0.2 0.21 0.19 0.21 3.17 0.21 62% 25% 0.16
welt pocket linng 0.3 0.28 0.29 0.3 0.3 0..29 0.31 0.3 0.3 0.27 0.3 0.3 0.29 0.31 0.29 4.08 0.29 62% 25% 0.23
SUM 12.60
time study
Given Required
Average Observed time for Cutting front panel for jacket =0.32MIN SMV?
Rating=62%
Allowance=25%
= 0.32MIN X 62%
=0.1984MIN
22
=0.1984MIN (1+25%)
=0.25MIN
SMV per piece for cutting jacket = SUM time for cutting = 12.60 MIN
Marker piece 2
SMV per piece for cutting jacket = 6.30MIN
FUSING SMV
With accurate Set of temperature and pressure of the fusing machine for a certain speed of fusing
the placket. I do here reverse calculation. Instead of time study record operator speed for placing
cut components (to be fused) in a minute. Once i get production per minute i can SAM per
garment (based on number of fused components).
Table 9-Time Study for Fusing for Suit

activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 total timeav.time rate%%allowe smv
1 fusing m/c 0.32 0.31 0.28 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.29 0.27 0.31 0.29 0.28 0.29 0.31 0.3
0.29 4.44 0.30 72% 25% 0.27
0.32 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.28 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.3
0.29 4.60 0.31 72% 25% 0.28
long pannel 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.3 0.32 0.31 0.3 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.32 0.31
0.3 4.59 0.31 72% 25% 0.28
AVERAGE 0.27
0.15 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.16 1.28 0.16 72% 25% 0.14
small pannal 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.14 1.17 0.15 72% 25% 0.14
0.14 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.16 1.13 0.15 72% 25% 0.13
AVERAGE SMV 0.14
SUM OF SMV 0.41
Given Required
Average Observed time for fussing long panel =0.30MIN SMV?
Rating=72%
Allowance=25%
= 0.30MIN X 72%
23
=0.216MIN
=0.216MIN MIN (1+25%)
=0.27MIN
Average Observed time for fussing short panel =0.16MIN
Rating=72%
Allowance=25%
= 0.16MIN X 72%
=0.136MIN
=0.1152MIN MIN (1+25%)
=0.14MIN
SUM time for fussing= fussing long panel + fussing short panel
=0.27MIN + 0.14MIN
SMV per piece for fussing = 0.41MIN
MARKING PLACEMENT SMV
Table 10-Time Study for Placement Marking for Suit

activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total time av.time rate% %allowe smv
J.pocket placement 1 manual 0.56 0.54 0.58 0.55 0.57 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.54 0.56 0.55 0.58 0.54 0.57 0.55 3.21 0.56 73% 25% 0.51
marking 0.54 0.58 0.59 0.55 0.56 0.58 0.57 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.55 0.58 0.57 0.55 0.55 3.21 0.56 73% 25% 0.51
0.32 0.35 0.34 0.3 0.34 0.32 0.33 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.34 0.3 0.35 0.36 0.33 2.11 0.33 73% 25% 0.30
tr.pocket placement marking 0.33 0.31 0.35 0.32 0.33 0.32 0.34 0.31 0.35 0.31 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.32 0.31 2.02 0.33 73% 25% 0.30
SUM 1.62
Given Required
Average Observed time for Jacket pocket placement marking=0.56MIN SMV?
Rating=73%
24
Allowance=25%
= 0.56MIN X 73%
=0.4088MIN
=0.4088MIN MIN (1+25%)
=0.51MIN
Average Observed time for trouser pocket placement marking SMV?
=0.33MIN
Rating=73%
Allowance=25%
= 0.33MIN X 73%
=0.2409MIN
=0.2409MIN MIN (1+25%)
=0.30MIN
SUM time for placement marking = trouser pocket placement marking + Jacket pocket
placement marking
=0.51MIN + 0.30MIN
SMV per piece for placement marking = 1.62MIN
INTERLINING INSERTING SM
Table 11-Time Study for Interlining Inserting for Suit

activity No oper M/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total timeav. Time%rating%allo. smv
3 manual 0.42 0.45 0.41 0.4 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.4 0.42 0.41 0.44 0.46 6.33 0.42 72% 25% 0.38
long componet 0.48 0.43 0.46 0.42 0.42 0.44 0.43 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.41 6.51 0.43 72% 25% 0.39
average SMV 0.38
0.15 0.17 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.16 6.51 0.17 72% 25% 0.15
short component 0.18 0.19 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.18 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.15 2.41 0.16 72% 25% 0.14
average SMV 0.14
SUM 0.52
Average Observed time for interlining inserting long component=0.42MIN SMV?
25
Rating=72%
Allowance=25%
= 0.42MIN X 72%
=0.3024MIN
=0.3024MIN MIN (1+25%)
=0.38MIN
Average Observed time for interlining inserting short component=0.17MIN SMV?
Rating=72%
Allowance=25%
= 0.17MIN X 72%
=0.1224MIN
=0.1224MIN MIN (1+25%)
=0.15MIN
SUM time for interlining inserting = average long component + average short component
=0.38MIN + 0.14MIN
SMV per piece for interlining inserting = 0.52MIN
RE-CUTTING SMV
Re-cutting is also done by other equipment such as hand scissors or band knife machine than
straight knife cutting machine. For re-cutting process SAM can be presented per lay or per
garment. Also consider whether all components need to re-cut or only few components
26
Table 12-Time Study for Re cutting for Suit
company name EMD GARMENT
activity No operM/C cycle times total timeav.time rate% %allowe
smv
BACK PANNEL S.KNIFE 0.55 0.58 0.57 0.55 0.55 1.03 1 0.55 0.59 1.03 0.57 0.58 0.59 1.03 0.57 10.34 0.69 71% 25% 0.61
PRIENCES S.KNIFE 0.56 0.54 0.55 0.54 0.56 0.57 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.57 0.55 0.54 0.57 0.56 0.54 8.35 0.56 71% 25% 0.49
UNDER SLEEVE S.KNIFE 0.48 0.55 0.57 0.56 0.55 0.58 0.54 0.57 0.55 0.55 0.57 0.54 0.52 0.57 0.59 8.29 0.55 71% 25% 0.49
COLLAR S.KNIFE 0.47 0.45 0.48 0.46 0.45 0.47 0.48 0.45 0.45 0.48 0.49 0.44 0.48 0.46 0.43 6.94 0.46 71% 25% 0.41
lappels S.KNIFE 0.56 0.58 1 0.59 0.58 0.57 0.59 1 1.01 0.58 0.58 1 1 0.59 0.55 10.78 0.72 71% 25% 0.64
front trouser 0.1 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.14 1.9 0.13 71% 25% 0.11
back trouser 0.48 0.48 0.49 0.45 0.47 0.46 0.44 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.47 0.46 0.45 0.46 0.46 6.98 0.47 71% 25% 0.41
welt pockets 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.22 0.24 0.2 0.22 0.21 0.23 0.2 0.22 0.21 0.22 0.25 0.24 3.33 0.22 71% 25% 0.20
SUM 4.66
Given Required
Average Observed time for Re-cutting back panel =0.69MIN SMV?
Rating=71%
Allowance=25%
= 0.69MIN X 71%
=0.4899MIN
=0.4899MIN MIN (1+25%)
=0.61MIN
SMV per piece for Re-cutting = 4.66MIN
NUMBERING SMV
Numbering SAM can be calculated per garment. For that first I find SAM per component and
later multiply how many components are numbered.
27
Table 13-Time Study for Numbering for Suit

Company nameEMD GARMENT cycle times
activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15total timeav. Time%rating%allo. smv
1 0.35 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.33 0.34 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.34 0.37 0.35 2.14 0.34 74% 25% 0.32
numbering 0.32 0.33 0.35 0.34 0.32 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.37 0.39 0.37 2.16 0.35 74% 25% 0.32
AVERAGE 0.32
Given Required
SMV?
Average Observed time for numbering =0.34MIN
Rating = 74%
Allowance =25%
Basic time = observed time X performance rating
= 0.34MIN X 74%
= 0.2516MIN
=0.2516MIN MIN (1+25%)
SMV per piece for numbering =0.32MIN
BUNDLING SMV
Total bundling time of a lay will depend on garment components; bundling time also depends
on operator’s fastness. I Study bundling time for all sizes in a lay and I find average SAM.
Cover all sizes in time study
Table 14-Time Study for Bundling for Suit
TIME STUDY FOR BUNDLING
activity No oper M/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total time av.time rate% %allowe smv
cutting bundeling 2 2.15 2.1 2.08 2.13 2.14 2.1 2.11 2.14 2.1 2.13 2.12 2.15 2.12 2.11 2.15 31.83 2.12 70% 25% 1.86
insert bundeling 1.05 1 1.02 1 1.02 1.04 1.03 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.02 1 1.02 1.03 15.34 1.02 70% 25% 0.89
fussing bundeling 0.41 0.41 0.42 0.4 0.41 0.4 0.43 0.42 0.41 0.39 0.42 0.42 0.4 0.39 0.39 6.12 0.41 70% 25% 0.36
final bundeling 1.52 1.48 1.49 0.5 0.51 0.51 0.52 0.51 0.53 0.51 0.54 0.53 0.52 1.51 1.54 12.72 0.85 70% 25% 0.74
SUM 3.85
28
Given Required
Average Observed time for cutting bundling =2.12MIN SMV?
Rating=70%
Allowance=25%
= 2.12MIN X 70%
=1.484MIN
=1.484MIN MIN (1+25%)
=1.86MIN
SMV per piece for numbering= SUM time for bundling
Number of pieces bundled
= 3.85MIN
20
SMV per piece for numbering= 0.19 MIN
FINAL ESTABLISHED STANDARD TIME FOR SUIT

Table 15-Time Study for Final Cutting Suit

cut quantity 80 customer jovani
marker pcs 2 TIME STUDY FOR SUIT
Company name EMD GARMENT
activity No oper M/C SMV
spreading 4 straight knife 2.4
marker making 2 manual 2.28
cutting for jacket 3 straight knife 6.30
cutting for trouser 1 straight knife 3.03
fussing 1 CNN FUSING MC 0.41
placment marking 1 manual 1.62
interling inserting 3 manual 0.52
recutting 3 automatic 4.66
numbering 1 manual 0.32
bundeling 2 manual 0.19
TOTAL SMV 21 21.73
29
Capacity Planning for Cutting Operation
Table 16- Capacity Planning for Cutting Operation
Actual Man power Operation Machine type SMV

4 spreading straight knife 2.4
2 marker making manual 2.28
3 cutting for jacket straight knife 6.30
1 cutting for trouser straight knife 3.03
1 fussing CNN FUSING 0.41

MC
1 placement marking manual 1.62
3 Interlining inserting manual 0.52
3 Re cutting Band knife 4.66
1 numbering numbering m/c 0.32
2 bundling bundling 0.19
21 Final 21.73
Given Required
Spreading SMV= 2.4MIN target per day?
working hour = 480MIN
Number of operator =4
Target per day (PCS) = total man power × total working minutes
SMV
= 4×480 MIN
2.4MIN
= 800 PCS per day
30
Given Require
Marker making SMV= 2.28MIN target per day?
Working hour=480MIN
Number of operator=2
SMV
2×480 MIN
2.28MIN
= 421 PCS per day
Given Required
Cutting for jacket SMV= 6.30MIN target per day?
Working hour=480MIN
SMV
= 3×480 MIN
6.30MIN
= 229 PCS per day
Given Required
Cutting for trouser SMV= 3.03MIN target per day?
Working hour=480MIN
SMV
= 1×480 MIN
3.03MIN
= 159 PCS
31 per day
Given Required
Fussing SMV= 0.41MIN target per day?
Working hour=480MIN
SMV
= 1×480 MIN
0.41MIN
=1171 PCS per day
Given Required
Placement marking SMV= 1.62MIN target per day?
Working hour=480MIN
SMV
= 1×480 MIN
1.62MIN
=296 PCS per day
Given Required
Interlining inserting SMV= 0.52MIN target per day?
Working hour=480MIN
SMV
=3×480 MIN
0.52MIN
=2769 PCS per day
32
Given Required
Re-cutting SMV= 4.66MIN target per day?
Working hour=480MIN
SMV
= 3×480 MIN
4.66MIN
=309 PCS per day
Given Required
Numbering SMV= 0.32MIN target per day?
Working hour=480MIN
SMV
= 1×480 MIN
0.32MIN
=1500 PCS per day
Given Required
Bundling SMV= 0.19MIN target per day?
Working hour=480MIN
SMV
= 2 ×480 MIN
0.19
= 5052 PCS per day
33
Given Required
Final SMV of suit = 21.73MIN target per day?
Working hour=480MIN
SMV
= 21×480 MIN
21.73MIN
= 464 PCS per day
34
CHAPTER FOUR
4.1. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

After we establish the time study for suit at cutting section we can determine capacity of the
cutting section with in detail operation. The below table shows the capacity of cutting section
according the activities of the cutting operation.at full capacity it can prepare 58 pieces of final
bundle cut input to the sewing section in a 1 hour the same as it can prepare 464 pieces input to
the sewing section in a day and also 12064 in a month and 144768 in a year
Production of suit
Activity SMV Hourly Daily Monthly Annually
target target target target
Spreading 2.4 100 800 20800 249600
Marker making 2.28 53 421 10947 131368
Cutting for jacket 6.30 29 229 5943 71314
Cutting for 3.03 20 159 4119 49426
trouser
Fussing 0.41 146 1171 30439 365268
Placement 1.62 37 296 7704 92444
marking
Interlining 0.52 346 2769 72000 864000
inserting
Re cutting 4.66 39 309 8034 96412
Numbering 0.32 188 1500 39000 468000
Bundling 0.19 632 5053 131368 1576421
Final suit 21.73 58 464 12061 144729
Table 17 Production of suit.
35
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1. CONCLUSION
The methodology to calculate cutting process time was developed for cutting operations one-way
fabric laying and cutting of stationery lays using the straight knife. From the system established
cutting time of fabrics can be calculated in relation to parameters such as fabric type, ply height
and the shape of the pattern. Also fabric laying time can be calculated in relation to parameters
such as fabric type and lay length.
The established a time study helps for monitoring tool condition in real time and obtained the
following results through verification experiments: (1) The proposed monitoring system of
cutting process time is very useful because of its parallel processing capability; (2) It enables the
monitoring of the cutting process time with high reliability;
Allowances would be added to the calculated value to get the final SMV for the cutting time of a
cutting operation. Allowances for personal needs of the operators, machine handling and manual
movements of the lay by the operators should be added to the calculated cutting time. The
amount of allowances added would depend mainly on the policies of the factory.
Basic times for the cutting process can be calculated using the developed system and those
values can be used to develop incentive schemas for cutting operators. It will help the factory
management to introduce an incentive scheme based on the individual performance level of the
operators in the cutting department.
Generally, to be competitive in today’s market both international and local, it is essential to

produce good quality products and having standard minute value for variety of products in
cutting section to determine and balance capacity in cutting section and sewing section to
become productive with fair price and in higher productivity.
36
REFERENCES
1. Herald Carr & Barbaral Latham (JUNWARY 2006), the technology of clothing
manufacturing second edition
2. Naresh Paneru (NOVEMBER2003), Implementation of lean manufacturing tools in

garment manufacturing process focusing sewing section of Men’s Shirt, Oulu University
of Applied Sciences)
3. . Prasanta Sarkar (NOVEMBER2005)Apparel Production, cutting
(http://www.onlineclothingstudy.com/2011/01/cutting-room-overview.ht
4. Mausmi Ambastha (SEPTEMBER 2012),Performance Measurement Tools – 3 Cutting
and Production Planning 4UJUDIWorld
37
Appendix I

activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total timeav. Time%rating %allo. SMV
main fabric spreding 1 manual 1.35 1.32 1.29 1.32 1.28 1.3 1.32 1.29 1.32 1.29 1.34 1.29 1.3 1.34 1.35 19.7 1.31 70% 25% 1.15
interling spreeding 1 manual 1.58 1.54 1.59 1.59 1.57 1.58 1.55 1.57 1.58 1.54 1.57 1.55 1.59 1.57 1.55 23.52 1.57 70% 25% 1.37
linning spreeding 1 manual 1.32 1.33 1.32 1.31 1.3 1.29 1.32 1.31 1.33 1.29 1.33 1.32 1.33 1.29 1.33 19.72 1.31 70% 25% 1.15
canvase spreeding 1 manual 1.32 1.28 1.26 1.28 1.27 1.26 1.28 1.3 1.29 1.32 1.31 1.29 1.28 1.31 1.3 19.35 1.29 70% 25% 1.13
SUM 4.80
2 manual(48)5.18 5.15 5.14 5.15 5.14 5.16 5.18 5.17 5.18 5.16 5.17 5.15 5.14 5.16 5.17 77.4 5.16 71% 25% 4.58
marker making 46 5.12 5.14 5.13 5.15 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.12 5.13 5.15 5.12 5.14 5.15 5.14 5.13 77.01 5.134 71% 25% 4.56
AVERAGE 4.57
2 manual(48)5.18 5.15 5.14 5.15 5.14 5.16 5.18 5.17 5.18 5.16 5.17 5.15 5.14 5.16 5.17 77.4 5.16 71% 25% 4.58
marker making 46 5.12 5.14 5.13 5.15 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.12 5.13 5.15 5.12 5.14 5.15 5.14 5.13 77.01 5.134 71% 25% 4.56
AVERAGE 4.57
frONT PANNEL linning S.KNIFE 1.11 1.09 1.08 1.06 1.11 1.06 1.09 1.11 1.08 1.09 1.11 1.09 1.08 1.1 1.09 16.35 1.09 65% 25% 0.89
FLY S.KNIFE 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.36 0.38 0.32 0.38 0.36 0.32 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.33 0.3 1.73 0.35 65% 25% 0.28
patelet S.KNIFE 0.44 0.46 0.45 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.47 0.46 0.48 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.46 0.45 0.42 6.75 0.45 65% 25% 0.37
WAST BANAND S.KNIFE 0.45 0.5 0.43 0.46 0.42 0.46 0.5 0.48 0.46 0.49 0.5 0.51 0.46 0.5 0.42 2.17 0.47 65% 25% 0.38
waST AND interlining S.KNIFE 0.42 0.42 0.45 0.42 0.45 0.43 0.42 0.45 0.41 0.45 0.45 0.44 0.42 0.41 0.39 2.1 0.43 65% 25% 0.35
wast band LINNING S.KNIFE 0.5 0.52 0.5 0.49 0.51 0.49 0.52 0.49 0.52 0.48 0.49 0.52 0.5 0.49 0.49 2.5 0.50 65% 25% 0.41
POCKET FLY S.KNIFE 0.2 0.19 0.2 0.21 0.2 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.2 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.22 1.07 0.20 65% 25% 0.16
POCKET LIP S.KNIFE 0.23 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.2 0.19 0.22 0.18 0.2 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.19 0.21 1.01 0.20 65% 25% 0.16
welt pocket S.KNIFE 0.18 0.16 0.17 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.19 0.16 2.5 0.17 65% 25% 0.14
welt pocket inter lining S.KNIFE 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.26 0.24 0.25380.23 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.2 0.21 3.6 0.24 65% 25% 0.20
welt pocket linng S.KNIFE 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.27 0.29 0.31 0.3 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.31 4.51 0.30 65% 25% 0.24
SUM 6.07
TIME STUDY FOR JACKET
activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15total timeav.time rate%%allowesmv
FRONT PANNE L interling 0.38 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.37 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 5.62 0.37 62% 25% 0.29
FRONT PANNEL lining 0.41 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 6.42 0.42 62% 25% 0.33
baCK PANNEL interlining 0.58 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.6 8.76 0.58 62% 25% 0.45
back pannel lining 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.09 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 16.35 1.09 62% 25% 0.84
PRIENCES S.KNIFE 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.58 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 8.74 0.58 62% 25% 0.45
PRIENCES interlinning 1.1 0.1 1.1 1.1 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.15 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 16.92 1.12 62% 25% 0.87
PRIENCES linning 0.59 0.6 0.6 1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.56 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 16.21 1.00 62% 25% 0.78
UPPER SLEEVE interlining 0.58 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.56 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 8.38 0.57 62% 25% 0.44
UPPER SLEEVE linning 0.57 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.55 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 8.27 0.55 62% 25% 0.43
UNDER SLEEVE interlining S.KNIFE 0.53 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.48 0.50 62% 25% 0.38
UNDER SLEEVE 0.51 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.53 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 8.13 0.52 62% 25% 0.40
UNDER SLEEVE 0.42 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 6.69 0.45 62% 25% 0.35
sleeve canvas 0.34 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.34 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 5.02 0.33 62% 25% 0.26
COLLAR S.KNIFE 0.54 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.53 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 7.75 0.51 6% 25% 0.04
COLLAR linning 0.58 0.6 1 0.6 0.6 1 1 0.6 0.6 0.57 1 0.6 0.6 0.6 1 8.23 1.14 62% 25% 0.88
collar bannd linning 0.39 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 6.1 0.39 62% 25% 0.31
lappels S.KNIFE 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 7.8 0.50 62% 25% 0.39
lappels interlining 0.56 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.54 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.79 0.52 62% 25% 0.40
lappels linning 0.45 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.46 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 6.3 1.32 62% 25% 1.02
canvase 0.54 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.57 0.6 1 0.6 0.5 0.6 8.4 0.56 62% 25% 0.43
side pannel decoretives 0.32 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.28 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 4.35 0.29 62% 25% 0.23
chest pocket ling 0.25 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.28 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 4.12 0.27 62% 25% 0.21
welt pocket 0.21 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.22 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.17 0.21 62% 25% 0.16
welt pocket linng 0.29 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0..29 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.27 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 4.08 0.29 62% 25% 0.23
SUM 12.60
activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total timeav.time rate%%allowe smv
1 fusing m/c0.32 0.31 0.28 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.29 0.27 0.31 0.29 0.28 0.29 0.31 0.3 0.29 4.44 0.30 72% 25% 0.27
0.32 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.28 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.3 0.29 4.60 0.31 72% 25% 0.28
long pannel 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.3 0.32 0.31 0.3 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.32 0.31 0.3 4.59 0.31 72% 25% 0.28
AVERAGE 0.27
0.15 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.16 1.28 0.16 72% 25% 0.14
small pannal 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.14 1.17 0.15 72% 25% 0.14
0.14 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.16 1.13 0.15 72% 25% 0.13
AVERAGE SMV 0.14
SUM OF SMV 0.41
39
activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total timeav.time rate%%allowe smv
J.pocket 1 manual 0.56 0.54 0.58 0.55 0.57 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.54 0.56 0.55 0.58 0.54 0.57 0.55 3.21 0.56 73% 25% 0.51
placement 0.54 0.58 0.59 0.55 0.56 0.58 0.57 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.55 0.58 0.57 0.55 0.55 3.21 0.56 73% 25% 0.51
0.32 0.35 0.34 0.3 0.34 0.32 0.33 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.34 0.3 0.35 0.36 0.33 2.11 0.33 73% 25% 0.30
tr.pocket placement marking 0.33 0.31 0.35 0.32 0.33 0.32 0.34 0.31 0.35 0.31 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.32 0.31 2.02 0.33 73% 25% 0.30
SUM 1.62
activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 total timeav. Time%rating%allo. smv
3 manual 0.42 0.45 0.41 0.4 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.4 0.42 0.41 0.44 0.46 6.33 0.42 72% 25% 0.38
long componet 0.48 0.43 0.46 0.42 0.42 0.44 0.43 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.41 6.51 0.43 72% 25% 0.39
average SMV 0.38
0.15 0.17 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.16 6.51 0.17 72% 25% 0.15
short component 0.18 0.19 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.18 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.15 2.41 0.16 72% 25% 0.14
average SMV 0.14
SUM 0.52
activity No operM/C cycle times total timeav.time rate% %allowesmv
BACK PANNEL S.KNIFE 0.55 0.58 0.57 0.55 0.55 1.03 1 0.55 0.59 1.03 0.57 0.58 0.59 1.03 0.57 10.34 0.69 71% 25% 0.61
PRIENCES S.KNIFE 0.56 0.54 0.55 0.54 0.56 0.57 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.57 0.55 0.54 0.57 0.56 0.54 8.35 0.56 71% 25% 0.49
UNDER SLEEVE S.KNIFE 0.48 0.55 0.57 0.56 0.55 0.58 0.54 0.57 0.55 0.55 0.57 0.54 0.52 0.57 0.59 8.29 0.55 71% 25% 0.49
COLLAR S.KNIFE 0.47 0.45 0.48 0.46 0.45 0.47 0.48 0.45 0.45 0.48 0.49 0.44 0.48 0.46 0.43 6.94 0.46 71% 25% 0.41
lappels S.KNIFE 0.56 0.58 1 0.59 0.58 0.57 0.59 1 1.01 0.58 0.58 1 1 0.59 0.55 10.78 0.72 71% 25% 0.64
front trouser 0.1 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.14 1.9 0.13 71% 25% 0.11
back trouser 0.48 0.48 0.49 0.45 0.47 0.46 0.44 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.47 0.46 0.45 0.46 0.46 6.98 0.47 71% 25% 0.41
welt pockets 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.22 0.24 0.2 0.22 0.21 0.23 0.2 0.22 0.21 0.22 0.25 0.24 3.33 0.22 71% 25% 0.20
SUM 4.66
40
activity No operM/C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15total timeav. Time%rating%allo. smv
1 0.35 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.33 0.34 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.34 0.37 0.35 2.14 0.34 74% 25% 0.32
numbering 0.32 0.33 0.35 0.34 0.32 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.37 0.39 0.37 2.16 0.35 74% 25% 0.32
AVERAGE 0.32
project number 1919 style type suit number of plys40
cut quantity80 customer jovani
marker pcs 2 TIME STUDY FOR SUIT
Company name EMD GARMENT
activity No operM/C SMV
spreading 4 straight knife2.4
marker making 2 manual 2.28
cutting for jacket 3 straight knife
6.30
cutting for trouser 1 straight knife
3.03
fussing 1 CNN FUSING 0.41MC
placment marking 1 manual 1.62
interling inserting 3 manual 0.52
recutting 3 automatic 4.66
numbering 1 numbering0.32
m/c
bundeling 2 manual 0.19
TOTAL SMV 21 21.7
41

Final Thesis On SMV

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Final Thesis On SMV

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Thesis On SMV

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ESTABLISHING STANDARD MINUTE VALUE FOR CUTTING

SECTION IN EMD GARMENT COMPANY

ETHIOPIAN INSTITUTE OF TEXTILE AND FASHON

BAHIR DAR UNIVERSITY

BAHIR DAR, ETHIOPIA

Under the Guidance of

ETHIOPIAN INSTITUTE OF TEXTILE AND FASHON

BAHIR DAR UNIVERSITY

MEBRAHTU G/HER ________________

Table 1. Available machines in E.M.D Company...........................................................................1

Figure 1 methodology of the project.............................................................................................11

Available machines in E.M.D Company

No_ Machines Brand Quantity

1.3.1. Specific Objectives

 To record SMV for all cutting operation

1.4.1. Beneficiaries of the study

1.6. Limitation of this project

2.1.1. Introduction Cutting room

Cutting room operation and process flow

2.1.2. Predetermined Time Standards (PTS)

2.1.3. Method of calculation

The Standard Time is the product of three factors:

The standard time can then be calculated by using:

STANDARDTIME=(OBSERVED TIME)( RATING FACTOR)(1+ PFD ALLOWANCE)

Time Study Tools

To do time study we need to arrange following tools

How to Conduct Time Study?

Step 3: Calculation of Basic Time

Step 4: Calculation of Standard Time

2.1.4. SAM and Lead Time in Production Planning

Cutting is considered to be the most important operation in apparel manufacturing because, it

Primary data Secondary data

Observation Written document Internet

Data Presentation and Analysis

Establish standard time for suit

To set cutting capacity for each operation

Result & Discussion

Figure 1 Methodology of the Project Thesis

3.1.1.1. Direct Observation

3.1.2. Secondary Data Collection

Secondary data was collected from

3.1.3. Data Presentation and Analysis

Operation breaks down for suit

STANDARD TIME STUDY SHEET

0 – 100(Std) Description Mi/hr Km / hr

Very slow; clumsy, fumbling movements; operative

Steady, deliberate, unhurried performance, as of a

Very fast; operator exhibits a high degree of

Exceptionally fast; requires intense effort and

standard time study sheet

standard time study sheet

Basic time=observed time X performance rating

Basic time=observed time X performance rating

Average time for marker making=size (48) + size (46)

standard time study sheet

CUTTING SMV FOR JACKET

standard time study sheet

standard time study sheet