Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1133 Peerfeedbatext-Based Spring11

    Uploaded by

    kinoglaz
    23 views1 page
    This document provides a grading rubric and instructions for peer critique of a text-based paper. It outlines 6 areas for reviewers to provide feedback on: 1) whether the introduction captures attention; 2) if there is a clear thesis; 3) if the thesis is supported by evidence; 4) if multiple sides of the issue are discussed; 5) if at least 5 academic sources are used; and 6) if sources are effectively incorporated. Reviewers are asked to write 2-3 paragraphs summarizing their feedback on these areas and provide specific examples, as well as a reverse outline of the paper's organization. The reviewer will submit their written peer critique for grading based on a 100 point scale.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    1133_peerfeedbatext-based_spring11

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides a grading rubric and instructions for peer critique of a text-based paper. It outlines 6 areas for reviewers to provide feedback on: 1) whether the introduction captures attention; 2) if there is a clear thesis; 3) if the thesis is supported by evidence; 4) if multiple sides of the issue are discussed; 5) if at least 5 academic sources are used; and 6) if sources are effectively incorporated. Reviewers are asked to write 2-3 paragraphs summarizing their feedback on these areas and provide specific examples, as well as a reverse outline of the paper's organization. The reviewer will submit their written peer critique for grading based on a 100 point scale.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    23 views1 page

    1133 Peerfeedbatext-Based Spring11

    Uploaded by

    kinoglaz
    This document provides a grading rubric and instructions for peer critique of a text-based paper. It outlines 6 areas for reviewers to provide feedback on: 1) whether the introduction captures attention; 2) if there is a clear thesis; 3) if the thesis is supported by evidence; 4) if multiple sides of the issue are discussed; 5) if at least 5 academic sources are used; and 6) if sources are effectively incorporated. Reviewers are asked to write 2-3 paragraphs summarizing their feedback on these areas and provide specific examples, as well as a reverse outline of the paper's organization. The reviewer will submit their written peer critique for grading based on a 100 point scale.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    GRADING RUBRIC AND PEER CRITIQUE FOR TEXT-BASED PAPER

    ///SPRING 2011 \\\

    Author: Respondent:

    ⇒ Exchange documents, either electronically or on paper.


    ⇒ Before the reviewer reads the paper, the author should tell the reviewer which aspects of
    the writing the author feels are her or his weakest.
    ⇒ For the review process, quickly read the draft to get an idea of the paper. After the first
    read, go through again and be ready to make comments. Be sure to focus on the aspects
    that the author asked you to focus on, but make sure you note any time you find the writing
    to be confusing or incomplete. For example, the author may make an assertion about the
    validity of her argument but offer no compelling reason for why she makes the claim she
    did. Point this out to the author and offer a possibility for how to correct the problem.
    ⇒ In addition to reading for bullets 2 and 3 above, be sure respond to all six points below:

    ⇒ Remember, point to specific portions of the writing in your response.

    1. The introduction captures the reader’s attention and encourages the reader’s attention
    throughout the writing?
    2. Includes a clear argument that the writer is trying to support. In other words, the author
    makes a clear claim a about the issue in the paper?
    3. Supports this thesis with evidence?
    4. Provides at least 2 sides to the issue at hand?
    5. Uses at least 5 academic/peer reviewed sources? At least three of these sources are
    academic/scholarly? If you are unsure if a source is either, please ask me and I will weigh in
    on the question.
    6. Effectively incorporates source materials into author’s own style?

    Write 2 – 3 paragraphs in which you summarize and discuss your answers to the above questions;
    email or transfer via USB your comments to the author. Remember to be specific in your
    suggestions. When replying, be sure to specifically describe what the author is doing well at this
    point and what he or she could strengthen. The most important part of this process is providing
    reasons for the feedback that you give your colleague.

    Finally, provide a reverse outline of the paper to help the author understand how clearly organized
    the paper is now. A reverse outline is exactly what it sounds like; your purpose—once you’ve read
    through the paper and provided feedback—is to provide a detailed outline of how the paper looks
    from conclusion to introduction.

    You will be turning in the peer critique that you wrote for your peer.

    Criteria Points
    Provides a clear research question /20
    Effectively uses at least 5 sources to support your argument /40
    Considers the conflicting sides of the issue carefully /25
    Offers a thoughtful peer critique /10
    Grammar/Mechanics/Style /5
    Total /100

    You might also like