Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Semiconductor Core-Shell Quantum Dot: A Low Temperature Nano-Sensor Material
Semiconductor Core-Shell Quantum Dot: A Low Temperature Nano-Sensor Material
Emergent Propert ies Result ing from T ype-II Band Alignment in Semiconduct or Nanohet erost …
Clemens Burda
Impact of shell t hickness on excit on and biexcit on binding energiesof a ZnSe/ZnS core--shell quant u…
Joseph T homas Andrews
Generat ion of st rongly polarizat ion-correlat ed phot on pairs by cascaded emission from individual CdS…
St efan St rauf
Semiconductor core-shell quantum dot: A low temperature nano-sensor
material
Saikat Chattopadhyay, Pratima Sen, Joseph Thomas Andrews, and Pranay Kumar Sen
Related Articles
Application of in-cell touch sensor using photo-leakage current in dual gate a-InGaZnO thin-film transistors
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 212104 (2012)
Microelectromechanical strain and pressure sensors based on electric field aligned carbon cone and carbon
black particles in a silicone elastomer matrix
J. Appl. Phys. 112, 094324 (2012)
Wheatstone bridge piezoresistive sensing for bulk-mode micromechanical resonator
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 193505 (2012)
Distant mechanical sensors based on cholesteric liquid crystals
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 193503 (2012)
Differential reflectance modulation sensing with diffractive microstructures
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 191103 (2012)
Downloaded 28 Nov 2012 to 59.162.23.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 111, 034310 (2012)
Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3681309]
Downloaded 28 Nov 2012 to 59.162.23.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
034310-2 Chattopadhyay et al. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 034310 (2012)
in the PL spectra can be observed only at temperatures where esses taking part in the deexcitation mechanism are consid-
the binding energies of excitons/biexcitons are larger than ered in Sec. II C.
the thermal energy. The changes in the PL peak energy and Our ultimate objective to demonstrate analytically the
spectral-width are governed by thermally stimulated transfer possibility of making a low temperature nano-sensor is
processes, confining potentials, exciton/biexciton energies examined in Sec. III where we have also carried out the nu-
etc. At high temperatures where the thermal energy exceeds merical analysis based on the theoretical formulation for
the exciton/biexciton binding energy, the independent charge three different types of CSQDs.
carriers play an important role. Dawson et al.10 have shown
that at elevated temperature the carrier dynamics is domi- A. Exciton and biexciton binding energies
nated by independent carrier relaxation. In the present theo-
We consider a type-I spherical core shell quantum dot
retical formulation we have restricted ourselves to low
with the bandgap energy of the core material being smaller
temperatures where exciton-phonon relaxation mechanism
than that of the shell material. The geometry and the dimen-
as well as direct radiative recombination process contribute
sions of the dot is illustrated in Fig. 1.
to the photoluminescence. However, we have neglected the
Here, a is the radius of the core and b is the radius of the
contribution of defect states on PL intensity.
CSQD as a whole such that the annular shell thickness is
The PL intensity in II–VI semiconductor quantum dots
d ¼ (b - a). The two-dimensional electron and hole confine-
is reported to be polarization sensitive,11 and the emission in-
ment potentials are given by14
tensity is proportional to the product of the probability of
occupation of the excited state and the probability of empty Vc; v 2
Ve; h ðrÞ ¼ ðr a2 Þ; (3)
ground state. The decay of the excited state could arise due a2
to radiative as well as nonradiative decay mechanisms. Con-
sequently, knowledge of initial population generated in the ~
r being the quasi-particle position satisfying the condition
excited state due to photoexcitation as well as the decay a < r < b. The subscripts e, h, c, and v denote the electron,
processes involved are of basic importance in the calculation hole, conduction band, and valence band, respectively. Vc
of PL intensity. Irrespective of the decay mechanism, the and Vv are the conduction and valence band offsets between
integrated PL intensity is reported to be express as12 the core and the shell. The quasi-particles in the CSQD expe-
rience strong confinement within the core due to the presence
I0 of the peripheral shell. The buffer layer further confines the
IðTÞ ¼ ; (1)
1 þ aexpðET =kTÞ electrons and holes within the shell. Hence, the particles
inside the core experience a double confinement like struc-
where a and ET are the process rate parameter and activation ture. The single particle wave functions under such situation
energy, respectively. The expression for the integrated PL in- can be described using WKB approximation as14,15
tensity in CSQD was given by13 8 ð a
> pAffiffiffiffi
> S
exp j j dr for b < r < a;
jj
>
N0 >
> b
IPL ðTÞ ¼ s srad ; (2) >
> ð a
1 þ rad eðEa =kTÞ
<
þ A p
sa sesc /j ðrÞ ¼ pCffiffiffiffi sin kj dr þ
4
for a < r < a;
>
> k j a
b
>
> ð
with sa, srad, and sesc being the fitting parameter, radiative as : pAffiffiffiffi
>
S
exp jj dr for a < r < b;
>
>
well as the thermal escape rate and N0 is the initial carrier jj a
population density that can be derived from the generation (4)
rate. We assume that the radiative recombination and thermal
escape rates are inversely proportional to the inhomogeneous
broadening (Cinh ) and the broadening arising due to exciton-
acoustic phonon (cph ), exciton-LO phonon coupling (CLO ).
Equations (1) and (2) have been obtained using the clas-
sical rate equations. In the present paper, we have used semi-
classical treatment in which quasi-particles-like electrons,
holes, excitons etc. are treated quantum mechanically while
the excitation caused by the electromagnetic radiation is
treated classically as waves. We have calculated the initial
population by using the density matrix analysis. The activa-
tion energies used in the above Eqs. (1) and (2) correspond
to the energies of the exciton and biexciton states. Accord-
ingly, we have obtained the energies of the exciton and biex-
citon states in Sec. II A. In order to determine PL intensity,
in Sec. II B we have taken into account the excitation of the
QD by the electromagnetic radiation via the dipole type of
radiation-matter interaction to obtain the population density FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of a core-shell quantum dot (CSQD) and dimen-
in the excitonic/biexcitonic states. The recombination proc- sions as assumed in present calculation.
Downloaded 28 Nov 2012 to 59.162.23.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
034310-3 Chattopadhyay et al. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 034310 (2012)
and
and
e2
wh ða; b; rh Þ ¼ /h ða; bÞ uh ðrh Þ: (7) Dbx ða; bÞ ¼ we ða; b; re ; rh Þ Ve þ w ða; b; r ;
e hr Þ
0 r e
e2
Here, ~r e and ~
r h represent the position vectors of electron and
wh ða; b; re ; rh Þ Vh þ
w ða; b; re ; rh Þ
hole, respectively. 0 r h
The interaction of near-resonant electromagnetic radia-
e2
tion with the QDs generates photo-induced bound one þ we ða; b; re ; rh Þ Vh þ
w ða; b; re ; rh Þ
electron-hole (e-h) pairs known as excitons. In QDs, the e-h 0 r e
e2
pair formation is influenced by the confinement potential in
wh ða; b; re ; rh Þ Ve þ w ða; b; r e ; r h Þ :
addition to the Coulombic term. Within Hartree approxima- r h 0
tion,16 the exchange ground state wave function (wX ) can be (11b)
written as
In writing the above equations, we have taken into account
wX ða; b; re ; rh Þ ¼ /e ða; bÞ:ue ðre Þ /h ða; bÞ:uh ðrh Þ: (8)
the temperature influenced bandgap shrinkage in semicon-
When inter-exciton separation approaches bulk exciton Bohr ductors by incorporating the Varshni contributions.17 In
radius aB, the Coulombic interaction forces existing between CSQD, band offset plays an important role in the confine-
these excitons lead to the creation of bound two electron- ment of the carriers within the core or shell materials. The
hole pairs well known as biexcitons similar to the case of temperature dependent bandgap shrinkage can also affect
formation of H2-molecule. Hence, the description of the the band offsets and due consideration has been given to it in
interaction of radiation with such small QD system requires the present analysis.
a three-level ladder system comprising of ground j0i, exciton In the interaction picture, the interactions of both excitons
jexi and biexciton jbxi states. Accordingly, we define the and biexcitons with radiation are taken to be of dipole type
unperturbed Hamiltonian as such that the interaction Hamiltonian HI can be written as22
0 l^0ex E 0
2 3 2 3
x0 0 0
H0 ¼ h4 0 xex 0 5; (9) HI ¼ 4 l^ex0 E 0 l^exbx E 5: (12)
6 7
0 0 xbx 0 l^bxex E 0
where hxi is the ground state energy of the ith state with the Here, l^ ij (i, j ¼ 0, ex, bx) is the element of the transition
subscript i (¼ 0, ex and bx) corresponding to the ground, dipole moment matrix operator and E [¼ E0exp (ixt)] is the
exciton, and biexciton states, respectively. The transition excitation electromagnetic field with amplitude E0 and fre-
energies corresponding to these levels are temperature sensi- quency x and it is taken to be parallel to the transition dipole
tive and given by17 moment operators l ^ ij . The transition dipole moment opera-
tors corresponding to the transitions between the exciton *
aT 2 ground states (l0ex) and biexciton * exciton states (lexbx)
hx0ex ¼
hðxex x0 Þ ¼ hxg jDex j (10a)
ðT þ bÞ are defined as22,23
Downloaded 28 Nov 2012 to 59.162.23.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
034310-4 Chattopadhyay et al. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 034310 (2012)
epcv Equation (15) has been solved using time dependent pertur-
^ 0ex ða; bÞ ¼
l j/ ða; bÞ /h ða; bÞj; (13a)
m0 x0ex e bation technique to obtain the density matrix elements of
various orders. For the present formulation, we need to know
and the zeroth and second-order components q(0) and q2. The
1 epcv first order density matrix q1 does not play any role in the
^ exbx ða; bÞ ¼
l j/ ða; bÞ /h ða; bÞj3 : (13b) estimation of the PL emission intensity and are not consid-
2 m0 xexbx e
ered henceforth. Standard mathematical procedure yields26
Here, pcv is the interband transition momentum matrix ele- 2
A 0 B
3
ment and is defined as24 qð2Þ ¼ 4 0 C 0 5: (18)
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
m0
ffi D 0 F
u3
u 1
me
jpct j ¼ u m0 : (14) Here,
t2 2 1
þ
hxg hxg þ Dso
!
4X20ex 1 1
A¼ þ ðq000 q0ee Þ; (19a)
x Dþ0e D 0e
Here, m0 is free electron mass, me is the effective mass of
electron, and Dso is the spin-orbit splitting energy for the 4X0ex Xexbx ðq0ee q0bb Þ ðq000 q0ee Þ
core and shell materials of the CSQD under consideration, B¼ þ ; (19b)
x Dþ0b Dþ
0e
hxg is the bandgap energy.
and
1 1 1
B. Population density in excitonic and biexcitonic C¼ Ax þ 4 þ þ ðq0ee q0bb Þ X2exbx ;
x 2iCðTÞ Deb Deb
states
(19c)
The excitation source generates the population in the
ðq000 q0ee Þ ðq0ee q0bb Þ
exciton and biexciton states. As discussed earlier, we have 4X0ex Xexbx
D¼ þ ; (19d)
considered dipole type radiation-matter interaction. With H0 x Dþ
0b Dþ
eb
and HI being the ground state and interaction Hamiltonians,
the equation of motion of the density matrix q can be written and
as25 Ax
F¼ : (19e)
@q x 2iCðTÞ
i
hq_ ¼ ½ðHo þ HI Þ; q þ ih ; (15)
@t relax
In the above equations, D6 6
0e ¼ x6x0ex þ iCðTÞ, Deb ¼ x
6
6xexbx þ iCðTÞ, D0b ¼ x62x0ex Dbx þ iCðTÞ, and Xij
where @q@t relax ¼ CðTÞq (T) being the temperature dependent ¼ lij E0 =2h is the Rabi frequency.
relaxation parameter that depends on the recombination
In Eq. (18), the parameters A, C, and F represent the ex-
processes. We have focused our attention to the radiative and
citation intensity dependent populations in ground, exciton,
non-radiative recombination processes. The latter being de-
and biexciton states, respectively. The occupation in the
pendent on the exciton-phonon interaction. Also, q is defined
exciton level is caused by the photoinduced transition of
using a generalized 3 3 density matrix as
electrons from ground state to the exciton state and relaxa-
2
q00 q0e q0b
3 tion of the population from the biexcitonic state to excitonic
q ¼ 4 qe0 qee qeb 5: (16) state. The former contribution is represented by the term pro-
ð0Þ ð0Þ
qb0 qbe qbb portional to ðq00 qee Þ and the latter is represented by the
ð0Þ ð0Þ
term ðqee qbb Þ in Eq. (19c). In general, at room tempera-
The diagonal elements represent the population in the ground ð0Þ
ture, ðqð0Þ
ee qbb Þ is negligibly small and one may neglect
ðq00 Þ, exciton ðqee Þ, and biexciton ðqbb Þ states while the
the contribution of the corresponding terms. These terms
off-diagonal elements represent the elements that undergo
maximize and give rise to PL peak intensity at resonance
transitions among the states represented by their subscripts.
with the exciton and biexcitonic transitions frequencies,
At finite temperature T, the initial state population q(0) for
respectively. The broadening of the peak is determined by
ground, exciton and biexciton state are given by
CðTÞ that depends on various recombination processes.
ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ
q00 ¼ 1 qee qbb ; (17a)
C. Radiative and nonradiative recombination
hjDex j
processes
ð0Þ
qee ¼ exp ; (17b)
kB T In the present calculations, we have incorporated the
losses occurring due to radiative and nonradiative decay proc-
and esses. Chen et al.27 have considered the thermal broadening of
the exciton peak through the exciton-phonon interaction. The
ð0Þ hðjDex j þ jDbx jÞ
qbb ¼ exp : (17c) temperature dependent full width at half maximum (FWHM)
kB T was taken as
Downloaded 28 Nov 2012 to 59.162.23.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
034310-5 Chattopadhyay et al. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 034310 (2012)
4X20ex 1
1 0 0
1 þ q00 qee ; (22)
x Dþ0e D0e
a
Materials Bandgap (eV) a (104 eV/K) b (K) (106 eV/K2)
b
Downloaded 28 Nov 2012 to 59.162.23.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
034310-6 Chattopadhyay et al. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 034310 (2012)
FIG. 3. (Color online) Temperature dependent photoluminescence intensity FIG. 4. (Color online) Temperature dependent photoluminescence intensity
for two core shell quantum dots having same core material (CdSe) with core variation at low temperature (5 K–78 K) in CdSe/ZnS, ZnSe/ZnS, and ZnSe.
radius, a ¼ 2.0 nm and different shell materials (i.e., ZnS and ZnSe) with
same shell thickness, d ¼ 0.2 nm. CdSe bare quantum dot photolumines-
cence intensity variation with temperature is also plotted here to understand
responsible for larger temperature sensitivity of the CdSe/
the effect of shell on a bare quantum dot at low temperature. ZnSe CSQDs.
To examine the contribution of temperature sensitivity
compared to CdSe QD, yield better PL intensity variations as of core, we have obtained PL intensity of CSQDs having
compared to CdSe QDs. The temperature sensitivity of PL same shell with different core materials. In Fig. 4, the PL in-
intensity was found to saturate above 100 K while the PL in- tensity variation as a function of temperature has been plot-
tensity decreases linearly with the lowering of the tempera- ted for CdSe/ZnS, ZnSe/ZnS, and ZnSe QDs. We changed
ture below 50 K in ZnSe QDs. The improved temperature the core material keeping the shell to be the same as ZnS to
sensitivity of ZnSe QDs can be assigned to the larger value examine the explicit PL response in the core material at low
of (a/b) in this system as compared to that of CdSe (Table I). temperature. The figure reveals that the sensitivity of CdSe/
In order to examine the role of temperature sensitivity of ZnS CSQDs is better. The reason for this can again be attrib-
the shell, we have obtained PL intensity of CSQDs having uted to (arel/brel) ratio as is evident from Table II.
the same core with two different shell materials. Figure 3
demonstrates the temperature dependence of PL intensity of
B. PL peak shift as a measure of temperature
CdSe/ZnS and CdSe/ZnSe CSQDs as well as that of a bare
CdSe QD. It is clear from the figure that coating CdSe QD Most of the available literatures show that the excitation
with a shell made up of a semiconductor material with larger sources selected for experimental study of PL spectra in
bandgap results in an increase in the PL intensity. However, II-VI semiconductor QDs are Ti:sapphire laser or Arþ laser.
coating CdSe with ZnSe exhibits sharp fall with increasing We consider the excitation of the QDs by using a Ti:sapphire
temperature below 30 K while the temperature variation is laser. The PL spectra for all the five samples (two bare and
not very sharp if the CdSe QD is coated with ZnS shell. Thus three core-shell QDs) are plotted in Fig. 5. The inset in the
a low temperature probe of CdSe/ZnSe CSQD appears to be figures have been plotted for the bare QDs. It is found that
more potential than a CdSe/ZnS CSQD probe. From the fig- the PL intensity in CSQDs can be increased by nearly an
ure, it can be further seen that at temperature above 40 K, the order of magnitude through the proper choice of the shell
PL intensity variations are small in both CSQDs. We define material. This finding establishes the utility of a shell on the
relative temperature dependent parameters arel(¼ ashell/acore) core of the QDs. The figures also exhibit red shifts in the PL
and brel(¼ bshell/bcore). From Table II, one can notice that peaks with increasing temperature. The redshift has been cal-
(arel/brel) is larger in a CdSe/ZnSe CSQD as compared culated and found to be around 1013 s-1 for the temperature
to that in CdSe/ZnS CSQD. This larger (arel/brel) value is range 10 K-75 K. Both Valerini et al.13 and Walker et al.2
have experimentally observed the redshift in PL peak with
increasing temperature. Walker et al.2 suggested that signifi-
TABLE II. Band offset values and effective Varshni parameters for selected
II–VI core-shell quantum dots.
cant temperature dependence of luminescence combined
with its insensitivity to oxygen quenching establishes CdSe/
VBO CBO aðshellÞ bðshellÞ arel 1 ZnS QDs as optical temperature indicator. On the basis of
a ¼ b ¼ (10 )
Materials (eV) (eV) rel aðcoreÞ rel bðcoreÞ brel the theoretical analysis made in the present paper, we find
that the temperature probe using CSQD can be made by cali-
CdSe/ZnSe (Ref. 31) 0.23 0.75 0.802 0.666 12.04
CdSe/ZnS (Ref. 32) 0.6 1.44 1.437 2.135 6.73
brating the probe via PL intensity variations as a function of
ZnSe/ZnS (Ref. 33) 0.58 0.03 1.792 3.209 5.58 temperature. Although the analysis made in the present paper
have been carried out for a single quantum dot, in practice
Downloaded 28 Nov 2012 to 59.162.23.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
034310-7 Chattopadhyay et al. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 034310 (2012)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The financial support received from the Department of
Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India is grate-
fully acknowledged by the authors.
1
S. Wang, S. Westcott, and W. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. B, 106, 11203 (2002).
2
G. W. Walker, V. C. Sundar, C. M. Rudzinski, A. W. Wun, M. G.
Bawendi, and D. G. Nocera, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3555 (2003).
3
J. Gallery, M. Gouterman, J. Callis, G. Khalil, B. McLachlan, and J. Bell,
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 712 (1994).
4
K. Maruszewski, D. Andrzejewski, and W. Strek, J. Lumin. 72–74, 226
(1997).
5
H.-S. Peng, S.-H. Huang, and O. S. Wolfbeis, J. Nanopart. Res. 12, 2729
(2010).
6
L. H. Fischer, G. S. Harms, and O. S. Wolfbeis, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
50, 4546 (2011).
7
F. Vetrone, R. Naccache, A. Zamarron, A. J. de la Fuente, F. Sanz-Rodr-
guez, L. M. Maestro, E. M. Rodriguez, D. Jaque, J. G. Sole, and J. A.
Capobianco, ACS Nano 4, 3254 (2010).
8
D. Pugh-Thomas, B. M. Walsh, and M. C. Gupta, Nanotechnology 22,
185503 (2011).
9
A. D. Lad and S. Mahamuni, Phys. Rev. B 78, 125421 (2008).
10
P. Dawson, O. Rubel, S. D. Baranovskii, K. Pierz, P. Thomas, and E. O.
Göbel, Phys. Rev. B 72, 235301 (2005).
11
A. L. Efros, Phys. Rev. B 46, 7448 (1992).
12
J. Krustok, H. Collan, and K. Hjelt, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 1442 (1997).
13
D. Valerini, A. Creti, M. Lomascolo, L. Manna, R. Cingolani, and M.
Anni, Phys. Rev. B 71, 235409 (2005).
14
P. Sen, S. Chattopadhyay, J. T. Andrews, and P. K. Sen, J. Phys. Chem.
Solids. 71, 1201 (2010).
15
A. Ghatak and S. Lokanathan, Quantum Mechanics Theory and Applica-
tions, 5th ed. (Macmillan India, New Delhi, 2004), pp. 380–410.
16
FIG. 5. (Color online) Temperature dependent PL spectra for three different O. Madelung, Introduction to Solid State Theory, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin,
CSQDs (i) CdSe/ZnSe CDQS and CdSe bare QD (inset), (ii) CdSe/ZnS 1996), Vol. 2.
17
CSQD and CdSe bare QD (inset), (iii) ZnSe/ZnS CSQD and ZnSe bare QD K. P. O’Donnell and X. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2924 (1991).
18
(inset). L. Viña, S. Logothetidis, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 30, 1979 (1984).
19
S. Adachi, Properties of Group-IV, III-V and II-VI Semiconductors (John
Wiley & Sons, Sussex, 2005), pp. 104–145.
one comes across an ensemble of quantum dots that can be 20
L. Banyai and S. W. Koch, Semiconductor Quantum Dots (World Scien-
restricted to about 5% during their growth using latest tech- tific, Singapore, 1993), Vol. 2, pp. 116–149.
21
niques in nano-technology. Consequently, the effect of size Nano-Optoelectronics Concepts, Physics and Devices, edited by M.
variation may be neglected without sacrificing the qualitative Grundmann (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002), pp. 181–182.
22
J. T. Andrews and P. Sen, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 2827 (2002).
accuracy of the result. 23
Y. Z. Hu, M. Lindberg, and S. W. Koch, Phys. Rev. B 42, 1713 (1990).
In conclusion, we have examined the possibility of using 24
P. K. Sen, Solid State Commun. 43, 141 (1982).
25
II-VI semiconductor quantum dots as low temperature nano- Y. R. Shen, The Principles of Nonlinear Optics (Wiley Interscience, New
York, 1984), pp. 13–15.
sensor. The expression for the PL intensity has been obtained 26
M. K. Bafna, P. Sen, and P. K. Sen, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 103515 (2006).
using density matrix formalism. We have incorporated the 27
R. Chen, D. Li, B. Liu, Z. Peng, G. G. Gurzadyan, Q. Xiong, and H. Sun,
temperature variations in the bandgap and the exciton-phonon Nano Lett. 10, 4956 (2010).
Downloaded 28 Nov 2012 to 59.162.23.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
034310-8 Chattopadhyay et al. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 034310 (2012)
28 31
T. Takagahara, J. Lumin. 70, 129 (1996). F. Gindele, U. Woggon, W. Langbein, J. M. Hvam, K. Leonardi, D. Hommel,
29
D. I. Lubyshev, P. P. Gonzalez-Borrero, E. Marega, Jr., E. Petitprez, N. La and H. Selke, Phys. Rev. B 60, 8773 (1999).
32
Scala, Jr., and P. Basmaji, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 205 (1996). R. Xie, U. Kolb, J. Li, T. Basche, and A. Mews, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127,
30
Z. Y. Xu, Z. D. Lu, X. P. Yang, Z. L. Yuan, B. Z. Zheng, J. Z. Xu, W. 7480 (2005).
33
K. Ge, Y. Wang, J. Wang, and L. L. Chang, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11528 K. Shahzad, D. J. Olego, and C. G. Van de Walle, Phys. Rev. B 38, 1417
(1996). (1988).
Downloaded 28 Nov 2012 to 59.162.23.73. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions