Professional Documents
Culture Documents
History, Properties and Removal Methods of Phenolic Compounds
History, Properties and Removal Methods of Phenolic Compounds
Abstract
In this review article, phenol and chlorophenols are investigated in terms of their
production histories, physiochemical properties, pollution resources and removal
methods. It is seen that both phenol and chlorophenols are highly toxic compounds,
produced from natural and anthropogenic sources, which are hazardous to both humans
and the environment even at very low concentrations. The typical industries which
produce phenol and chlorophenol pollution are petrochemical, textile, plastics, resin
manufacturing, dye, pharmaceutical, iron and steel, pulp and paper industries as well as
the petroleum refineries, and coal gasification operations. Phenol is a highly corrosive
and nerve poisoning agent. It causes harmful side effects such as sour mouth, diarrhea
and impaired vision. It is also toxic for the eco-system with toxicity levels ranging
between 10-24 mg/L for humans, 9-25 mg/l for fish and lethal blood concentration
between 150-mg/100 ml. Chlorophenols found in natural waters or drinking water also
cause serious health problems such as histopathological alterations, genotoxicity,
mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity among others. Due to the aforementioned reasons, the
phenolic compounds in wastewaters or in drinking water must be removed using a
suitable wastewater treatment method such as adsorption, extraction, electrochemical
oxidation, biodegradation, wet air oxidation photo catalysis or enzyme treatment among
others.
1. Introduction
Due to the advancement of technology and rapid industrial growth, water resources
all over the world are under threat. In general, developed countries suffer from chemical
discharge problems while developing countries suffer from agricultural sources. In most
wastewaters and in drinking waters, one or more of the following toxic organic pollutants
may occur [1]: Organochlorines, chlorobenzenes (CBs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-
dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofuranes (PCDFs), phenols, chlorophenols
and other phenol-derived compounds.
Phenolic compounds are phytochemicals found in nature which cannot be synthesized
in the human body. Thus, they are mainly taken from food and medicinal herbs. They are
found in most plant tissues, including fruits and vegetables [2]. They exist in water
systems due to the discharge of contaminated streams from industrial, agricultural and
domestic activities as well as a result of natural phenomena. They cause both severe and
long‐lasting effects on both humans and animals including damage to red blood cells and
the liver. Their interaction with microorganisms, inorganic and other organic compounds
in water can produce substituted compounds or other moieties, which may be as toxic as
the original phenolic compounds [3].
Chlorophenols (CPs) are common contaminants which can be found in surface,
ground, and drinking water [4-8]. Thermal and chemical degradation of chlorophenols
lead to the formation of harmful substances which cause public health problems such as
genotoxicity, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity among others. The transformation of
chlorophenols also can lead to the formation of electrophilic metabolites that may bind
and damage the DNA or gene products [5, 6].
The academic and industrial chemist F. F. Runge was born on February 8, 1794 in
Billwerder near Hamburg. Runge isolated phenol from coal tar in 1834 in impure form
and called it “carbolic acid” (Karbols¨aure) or “coal oil acid” (Kohlen¨ols¨aure) [7-9].
Phenol was first used as a disinfectant in 1865 by the British surgeon Joseph Lister at
the Glasgow University, Scotland, for sterilizing wounds, surgical dressings and
instruments [10]. However, the phenol sprays used during the surgeries were also
dangerous to the mucous membrane of the lungs when inhaled. Thus, by 1890, the phenol
spray was abandoned by the medical community [11].
During the Boer War, England placed an embargo on phenol, which caused a
shortage on the continent. As a result, Raschig Process was developed in Germany in the
year 1940 for the manufacture of synthetic phenol on a large scale [12, 13].
During World Wars I and II, the Sulfonation Process was further improved and other
processes such as Chlorination Process and Raschig Process were first commercialized
[14]. In 1924, Dow Chemical started to commercialize synthetic phenol based on the
direct chlorination of benzene to chlorobenzene [11].
Since the mid-20th century, patents related to phenol production have primarily
focused on the improvements to the existing processes rather than developing alternative
processes. One example is the European patent filed by the Mitsui Petrochemical Limited
(LTD) in 1989 which proposed a method to reduce the byproduct acetone through the
integration of a recycle loop [15, 16].
Presently, phenol is used in the production of phenolic and epoxy resins [17, 18],
plastics [19], plasticizers [20], polycarbonates [21], nylon [22], dyes [23, 24]
disinfectants [25], herbicides [26], polymers, drugs, pesticides [27] wood preservatives
[28] and fungicides [29].
Chlorophenols are produced by the electrophilic halogenation of phenol with chlorine.
There are 5 basic types and 19 different chlorophenols. Some chlorophenols are used as
pesticides and herbicides. Others are used as antiseptics and disinfectants [30].
Chlorophenols are very toxic and their presence is dangerous for humans as well as
aquatic life. They are found in the wastewaters of textile, pharmaceutical, petrochemical,
pesticide, paper and other industries [31].
The following processes have been mainly used in the industry for the production of
phenol [10, 32] up to date: Sulphonation of benzene and production of phenol by heating
the benzenesulphonate in molten alkali hydroxide [33], Chlorination of benzene and
alkaline hydrolysis of the chlorobenzene, C-Chlorination of benzene and catalytic
saponification by Cu in the steam hydrolysis of the chlorobenzene [34, 35] (Raschig
process, Raschig–Hooker Process), Alkylation of benzene with propene to
isopropylbenzene (cumene), Oxidation of cumene to the corresponding tert-
hydroperoxide and cleavage to phenol and acetone (Hock Process), Toluene oxidation to
benzoic acid and subsequent oxidizing decarboxylation to phenol (Dow Process),
Dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol–cyclohexanone mixtures [10].
Among these processes, only the Hock and Toluene Oxidation Processes are
important industrially. The other processes were discarded for economic reasons [10].
The global phenol market size reached a value of US Dollars (USD) 23.17 billion in the
year 2020. The phenol market is further expected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth
Rate of (CAGR) of 5.3% between the years 2021 and 2026 to reach to a value of about
USD 30 billion by the year 2026 [36].
In the case of chlorophenols, their production and usage have led to the entry of
persistent toxic components into the water systems which are resistant to biodegradation.
However, microorganisms exposed to these pollutants have evolved the ability to
biodegrade some of them and the routes by which a given compound is degraded are
determined by the physical, chemical, and microbiological components of the water
system under question. Understanding the genetic basis of catabolism of chlorophenols
may improve the efficiency of naturally occurring microorganisms or help to raise new
microorganisms which are able to degrade chlorophenols [37].
Phenol is a highly corrosive and nerve poisoning agent. It causes harmful side
effects such as sour mouth, diarrhea and impaired vision. It is also toxic for fish and the
toxicity levels usually range between 10-24 mg/L for humans and 9-25 mg/l for fish
while the lethal blood concentration is around 150-mg/100 ml [47].
The available removal methods used for phenol can be separated into two main
groups: conventional and advanced. Conventional methods include steam distillation,
extraction, adsorption, ion exchange [42] and advanced methods include wet air
oxidation, catalytic wet air oxidation, ozonation, membrane processes, electrochemical
oxidation, biological processes/biodegradation and enzymatic treatment among others
[42, 48].
It is possible to carry out steam distillation processes, based on the relative
volatility of phenol, for phenol removal from aqueous solutions. The phenol–water
mixture has a minimum azeotrope at 9.21% (w/w) phenol [42, 49-51]. Thus, azeotropic
distillation or steam stripping can purify the water from phenol impurities and an effluent
concentration as low as 0.01 mg/L can be obtained [48].
Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), is a standard, non-destructive process for the
treatment of phenolic compounds, suitable over a wide range of phenol concentrations
and is cost-effective in some cases. Benzene and butyl acetate have been used as solvents
in this process in the past, but the most common solvent at present is di-isopropyl ether
(DIPE), which is used in the phenosolvan process [97, 98]. For the extraction process, the
solubility of the preferred solvent in water should be tolerable eliminating the need for
further purification steps. The selectivity of the solvent depends mainly on the type of
the solvent, temperature of the system, and the concentration of the phenol in the
wastewater [97].
Adsorption method for the removal of phenols from water is effective on a large
scale from low concentrations to high concentrations, depending on the economics and
recycling and the adsorbent. Activated carbon (AC) is the most used adsorbent in the
industry. It is expensive but has been proven to be effective for the removal of even trace
levels of organic compounds. Therefore, new options are being developed for AC
including impregnation with nanoparticles; using different sources of carbon, different
activation methods, Carbon NanoTubes (CNTs), graphene‐based materials as well as
substitution with low cost biosorbents such as chitin/chitosan [98–100].
Phenol can also be removed by using strong-base anion exchangers [101, 102].
In a sample literature study, it was observed that the studied amberlite adsorption
capacity was higher than that of known adsorbents. A theoretical model based on
molecular adsorption and ion exchange was developed to fit the experimental data and to
obtain the parameters related to both phenomena. It was seen that uptake onto Amberlite
occured by “only” adsorption at acidic pH and by both “both” adsorption and ion
exchange at alkaline pH. The phenol removal increased at pH values from 9 to 14 and
remained constant below 8. The developed theoretical model allowed the phenol removal
to be determined depending on the value of pH and the amount of resin [102].
The wet air oxidation (WAO) reaction is recognized as the cleanest technique of
all because no additive is added to cause secondary pollution. At reasonable temperatures
(175°C–320°C) and high pressures of 2.17–20.71 MPa, wastewater is kept in the liquid
phase and the organics are oxidized into small organic acids which are likely to be
biodegradable [106]. Usually, it is suitable for a wide range of wastewaters with initial
COD values between 20-200 g/L [107]. It is also recognized as a potential pre-treatment
before biodegradation (BOD) to detoxify hazardous pollutants and satisfy the
biodegradation requirements [108].
In literature studies, it was shown that, during the process, phenol breaks down
to form aromatics (hydroquinone, catechol, and benzoquinone) and carboxylic acids
(oxalic and formic acid). Furthermore, traces of malonic, maleic and fumaric acid were
also detected [115]. Eftaxias et al. [116] showed that the Langmuir Hinshelwood Model
could be used in order to define the reaction mechanism. Using this model, all
experimental concentration profiles were accurately described with mean deviations less
than 8%. The use of Trickle Bed Reactors (TBR) is common in the CWAO of phenolic
compounds; however liquid maldistribution may cause hot spot formation, reactor
thermal runaway and deactivation of the catalyst [115].
Chemical adsorption and oxidation are the most common methods used for
phenol removal from wastewaters but still they have some drawbacks like higher energy
consumption, high operating cost, and being unsustainable. As an alternative, ozone-
based technology has been widely used to degrade organic pollutants since ozone has a
high oxidizing capability. However, single ozonation exhibits very low efficiency,
requires a large amount of ozone, has low solubility in water, low reaction rate with
organic compounds, and a slow mineralization rate. Hence, in order to overcome this
problem, a catalyst must be used in the process in order to increase the degradation
efficiency and to reduce the amount of ozone used. The process can be either
homogeneous or heterogeneous. Heterogeneous catalytic ozonation has the advantage of
producing no secondary pollutants and also it is easier to regenerate the catalyst. The
removal of phenol by heterogeneous catalytic ozonation has been studied by many
researchers. Of the many types of catalysts that have been used, zeolites have a high
potential due to their large specific surface areas, good thermal and chemical stabilities
and controllable hydrophilic/hydrophobic properties [117].
In late years, researchers have shifted their focus towards the advanced
membrane processes because these processes are eco-friendly, cost-effective and no
chemical additives are needed. However, the main drawback of these processes is the
flux decline caused by membrane fouling [89]. Membrane fouling is the phenomenon
caused by the accumulation of biological inorganic, organic and colloidal species onto
the membrane surface or within its pores. It results in flux decline and a rapidly
increasing transmembrane pressure during operation, and the possible deterioration of
mechanical strength [118, 119].
Polymers and ceramics are commonly used in the fabrication of membranes
which are used for filtration. Polymer membranes are relatively cheap, but have lower
tolerance to harsh conditions, whereas ceramic membranes have higher mechanical
strength which results in greater resistance to harsh environments and longer lifespan
[120, 121]. Researchers are exploring effective ways to combine the advantages of the
two membranes in order to produce a composite material called as the Mixed Matrix
Membrane (MMM) [122].
Several methods are also available for the removal of chlorinated phenols from
water. Among them, biodegradation [14], oxidation by AOPs [138] and adsorption [139,
140] are the most widely used [141].
6.Comparison of Different Methods for the Removal of Phenol and
Chlorophenols
Although various traditional and advanced methods are possible to apply for the
removal of phenol from wastewaters; the two important parameters which define the
suitable method are the initial and final phenol concentrations as seen in Table 1 and
Table 2 [89]:
References
[7] Runge F. Ueber einige Produkte der Steinkohlendestillation. Annalen der Physik und
Chemie. 1834;107(5):65-78.
[8] Runge F. Ueber einige Producte der Steinkohlendestillation. Annalen der Physik und
Chemie. 1834;108(20-25):328-333.
[9] Reichenbach. Meinung von dem Kyanol, der Karbolsäure u. s. f. des Hrn. Runge.
Annalen der Physik und Chemie. 1834;107(32):497-512.
[10] Nguyen, M.T., Kryachko, E.S., Vanquickenborne, L.G. General and theoretical
aspects of phenols. In: Rappoport Z et al., editor. The Chemistry of Phenols. Chichester:
Wiley; 2013. p.6. DOI: 10.1002/0470857277.
[13] Rahman M, Bin Abdul Razzak P, Binti Surani N, Binti Musdafa Kamal N, Faudzi S,
Mohammad N et al. Mini Design Project (Production of Phenol). Universiti Teknologi
Mara; 2018.
[21] Wang B, Wang L, Zhu J, Chen S, Sun H. Condensation of phenol and acetone on a
modified macroreticular ion exchange resin catalyst. Frontiers of Chemical Science and
Engineering. 2013;7(2):218-225.
[32] Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2001.
[35] Vorozhtzov Jr., N.N. and Oshuev, A.G. 1933. Anilinokrasochnaya Promyshl. 3, 245.
[38] Wade L. phenol | Definition, Structure, Uses, & Facts [Internet]. Encyclopedia
Britannica. 2021 [cited 7 September 2021]. Available from:
https://www.britannica.com/science/phenol
[46] Jin M, Yang Y. Simultaneous determination of nine trace mono- and di-
chlorophenols in water by ion chromatography atmospheric pressure chemical ionization
mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2006;566(2):193-199.
[47] Kulkarni S, Kaware D. Review on Research for Removal of Phenol from
Wastewater. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2013;3(4).
[48] Pérez Ramírez, E.E., de la Luz Asunción, M., Saucedo Rivalcoba, V., Martínez
Hernández, A., Velasco Santos, C. 2021. In: Phenolic Compounds Natural Sources,
Importance and Applications. M. Soto-Hernández, M. Palma-Tenango and R. García-
Mateos (Eds.) InTechOpen, London. 344-372.
97.Busca, G., Berardinelli, S., Resini C., Arrighi, L. 2008. Technologies for the removal
of phenol from fluid streams: a short review of recent developments. J. Hazard. Mater.
160. 265–288.
99.Park, H.S., Koduru, J.R., Choo, K.H., Lee, B. 2015. Activated carbons impregnated
with iron oxide nanoparticles for enhanced removal of bisphenol A and natural organic
matter. J. Hazard. Mater. 286, 15–324.
100.Tran, V.S., Ngo, H.H., Guo, W., Zhang, J., Liang, S., Ton‐That C., Zhang, X. 2015.
Typical low cost biosorbents for adsorptive removal of specific organic pollutants from
water. Bioresour. Tech. 182, 353–363.
102.Carmona, M., Lucas A., Valverde J., Velasco B., Rodriguez, J. 2006. Chem. Eng. J.
117, 155-160.
103.Zhou, L., Cao, H., Descorme, C., Xie, Y. 2018. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 12, 1-20.
106.Víctor-Ortega, M.D., Ochando-Pulido, J.M. 2016. Chem. Eng. Trans. 47, 253-258.
107.Debellefontaine, H., Chakchouk, M., Foussard, J.N., Tissot. D., Striolo, P. 1996.
Environ. Pollut. 1996, 92, 155–164.
108.Dietrich, M., Rall.T.L., Canney,P.J. 1985. Wet air oxidation of hazardous organics in
wastewater. Environ. Prog. 4, 171–177.
109.Fortuny, A., Ferrer, C., Bengoa, C., Font, J., Fabregat, A. 1995. Catal. Today, 24,
79–83.
111.Suárez-Ojeda, M. Fabregat A., Stüber F., Fortuny A., Carrera J., Font J. 2007. Chem.
Eng. J. 132, 105-111.
112.Monteros A., Lafaye G., Cervantes A., Del Angel G., Barbier Jr. J., Torres, G. 2015.
Catal. Today 258 564-569.
114.Serra-Pérez, E., Álvarez-Torrellas, S., Ismael Águeda, V., Delgado, J. A., Ovejero,
G., & García, J. (2019). Applied Surface Science, 473, 726–737.
115.TlaMakatsa, T.J., Baloyi, J., Ntho, T., Masuku, C.M. 2021. Catalytic wet air
oxidation of phenol: Review of the reaction mechanism, kinetics, and CFD modeling,
Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Tech. 51, 1891-1923.
116.Eftaxias, A. 2002. Catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol in a trickle bed reactor:
Kinetics and reactor modelling. Dissertation. Department of Chemical Engineering,
Higher Technical School of Chemical Engineering, Rovira i Virgili University, Spain.
117.Saputera W., Putrie A., Esmailpour A., Sasongko D., Suendo V., Mukti R., 2021.
Catalysts 11, 998.
118.Wang, K., Abdala, A., Hilal, N., Khraisheh, M. 2017. Membrane Characterization.
259–306.
120.Dordick, J.S., Marletta, M.A., Klibanov, A.M. 1987. Biotech. Bioeng. 30, 31-36.
121.Kumar, R.V., Basumatary, A.K., Ghoshal, A.K., Pugazhenthi, G. 2014. RSC Adv. 5,
6246–6254.
122.Qadir, D., Mukhtar, H., Keong, L.K. 2016. Sep. Purif. Rev. 46, 62–80.
125.L. Gu, B. Wang, H. Z. Ma and W. P. Kong. 2006. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 81,
1697-1704.
126. Bashir M.J.K., Isa M.H., Kutty S.R.M., Awang Z.B., Azizs H.A., Mohajeri S.,
Farooqi, I.H. 2009. Waste Manage. 29, 2534-2541.
127.Gomes, L., Freitas, R.G., Malpass, G.R.P., Pereira, E.C., Motheo, A. 2009. J.Appl.
Electrochem. 39, 117-121.
128.Gaudet, J., Tavares, A.C., Trasatti, S., Guay., D. 2005. Chem. Mater. 17, 1570-1579.
129.Zhao, T., Lu, J., Hu, C., Zhu, C., Zhao, J., and Dong, W. 2014. Int. J. Electrochem.
Sci. 9, 2354–2366.
130.Stucki, S., Kötz, R., Carcer, B., and Suter, W. 1991. J. Appl. Electrochem. 21, 99–
104.
131.Polcaro, A. M., Vacca, A., Mascia, M., and Palmas, S. 2005. Electrochim. Acta, 50,
1841–1847.
132.Guido, B., Berardinelli, S., Resini, C., and Arrighi, L. 2008. J. Hazard. Mater. 160,
265–288.
133. Saratale, R., Hwang, K., Song, J., Saratale, G., Kim, D. (2016). J. Environ. Eng.
142, 04015064.
134.Ramírez, E., Asunción, M.D., Rivalcoba, V.S., Hernández, A., & Santos, C.V. 2017.
Removal of phenolic compounds from water by adsorption and photocatalysis. In:
Phenolic Compounds - Natural Sources, Importance and Applications.
137.Chiong, T., Lau, S.Y., Khor, E.H., Danquah, M.K. 2014. OA Biotechnology 10, 9-
15.
138.Pera-Titus, M., Garcia-Molina, V., Baños, M.A., Giménez, J., Esplugas, S. 2004.
Appl. Catal. B Environ. 47, 219–256.
139.Dąbrowski, A., Podkościelny, P., Hubicki, Z., Barczak, M. 2005. Chemosphere 58,
1049–1070.
140.Soto, M.L., Moure, A, Dominguez, H., Parajo, J.C. 2011. J Food Eng. 105, 1–27