Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Coca Cola Financial Analysis
Coca Cola Financial Analysis
Coca Cola Financial Analysis
Student’s Name
Department’s Name
Course Studied
Course Code
Professor’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
2
Introduction
PepsiCo and Coca Cola have been competing in this particular market of manufacturing
non-alcoholic beverages and soft drinks as well as their distribution across the world. Coca Cola
Company constituted of more than 500 brands of soft drinks worldwide which contribute to its
vast revenue sources. On the other hand, PepsiCo specifically specialized itself in the
manufacturing of soft drinks and selling and distribution of packed food stuffs. The drink
ranging from small scale to medium scale to emerging, expanding, and established. The
development of this particular industry has been fueled by the expansion of vigorous living and
healthier choices amongst individuals irrespective of their age. This aspect of health will
continue to have an impact on business habits. Despite stiff competition from PepsiCo, Coca
Cola Company remains the world’s leading beverage company. The company boosts having the
capacity to operate in more than 200 countries and approximately 1.5 billion people worldwide
are served with a beverage manufactured from Coca Cola Company. While PepsiCo boasts being
the most successful beverage and snack food industry globally. As evident in the financial
statement of the two corporations, it is clear that they have gone on to make use of diverse
competitive approaches that make them exception and distinctive to each other. Therefore, this
paper will provide a clear financial analysis of both PepsiCo and Coca Cola Company.
PepsiCo
Coca Cola
Price to earnings ratio = 44.24___
1.15
Price to earnings ratio = 29.30
Price to earnings ratio assists stakeholders and stockholders to analyze the amount of
money have to spend on purchasing a stock based on its current earnings. In addition, it provides
indications of whether the market is overvaluing or undervaluing the company. A stock price
showing a high P/E ratio implies that stakeholders anticipates increased earnings growth in the
near future in relation to the overall market where stakeholders are spending more for current
earnings with the expectations of future growth of the earnings. Stakeholder’s sees high P/E
Profitability Ratios
PepsiCo
Coca cola________________________PepsiCo
63.05%_________________________54.56%__
4
Probability ratios are financial metrics which are essential in the measuring and
evaluating the capacity of business to make profit. The ratio is more preferred when it’s high
since it indicate that the company is making good use of its assets to generate profits. Businesses
have the capacity to go on well with its operations for a several years without making any
considerable profits; however, in order to survive well in the long run, the corporation should
ultimately achieve and maintain a profit making culture. Based on the above ratios, Coca Cola
tends to have a higher profitability ration as compared to Pepsi Co. an indication that the
company is successfully making good use of its assets to make profits (PepsiCo. 2019).
Solvency Ratio
Stockholders’ Equity
PepsiCo
Coca-Cola Co.
PepsiCo_______________________Coca-Cola
4.32 3.37____
Debt to equity ratio is normally regarded as solvency ratio since it shows a whether
business cash flow is adequate to cater for its long and short term debt commitment. These ratios
reflect a company’s financial well-being. Solvency ratio evaluates a company’s capacity to meet
its long term commitments while the liquidity ratio only measures the short term financial well-
being of a company. The ideal debt to equity ratio should not go beyond the level of 2. Though it
5
tends to vary by industries. As for the case of Pepsi and coca cola corporations, their debts to
equity ratio are above the level of 2. The figures imply that the two corporations are financing
their growth by means of borrowings. A business that has a higher debt to equity ratio is
regarded a higher risk to lenders, stake and stockholders (U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission., 2019). . Likewise, PepsiCo is considered more risky compared to coca Cola. It is
so since it has a higher debt to equity ratio compared to Coca-Cola Company (PepsiCo, 2019).
Liquidity Ratio
Current liabilities
PepsiCo.
= 0.99
CocaCola Co.
= 1.05
PepsiCo _________________Coca-Cola______
0.99 1.05_________
Current ratio is a ratio between current assets and current liabilities. The ratio shows
whether a corporation has sufficient cash flow to cater for both its short and long term expenses
and debts. It is acceptable when this ratio is high since it implies that a business is liquid enough
to funds its daily operations. The current ratio exceeding 1 is the optimum ratio for a company.
Therefore, on the basis of this assessment the Coca-Cola Company is more liquid in comparison
to PepsiCo. That is, it has the capacity to finance it current liabilities. The ratio further implies
that for every $1 of debt, the Coca-Cola Company has $1.05 existing asset to cater for its debts.
6
On the other hand, PepsiCo have insufficient assets to cover for its current liabilities since its
Both companies have made excellent use of their assets, allowing them to earn profits.
PepsiCo's average cash turnover ratio was 26.08 percent greater than Coca-turnover Cola's rate
of 6.24 percent. Coca-Cola has a high accounts receivable turnover rate when compared to
PepsiCo, which has a turnover rate of 9.98 percent. Another financial metric is PPE turnover,
which shows how effectively a company uses its property, such as plant and equipment, to
achieve growth. Both PPE in the two companies show that Pepsi had a performance of 3.78,
which is somewhat better than Coca Cola's piece of 3.75 (U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 2019). .
Coca-Cola is a blue-chip stock that is a fantastic investment for profit investors looking to
diversify their portfolio with the potential for further profit growth well into the future. It pays
out a healthy dividend. It has a steady rate of growth. Since 1920, the organization has paid a
consistent profit, has an excellent plan of action that works through every monetary cycle, and
generates predictable free revenue. In any case, investors looking for double-digit profit growth
for the foreseeable future should go elsewhere. Investors can now reap the rewards of this
illustrious company through a steadily rising natural esteem and a burgeoning profit margin.
Coca-upper Cola's management has identified six significant problems and dangers,
according to its discussion and analysis. The first is that, as the global rate of obesity rises,
consumers, health experts, and government organizations are becoming increasingly concerned.
Despite the fact that many people have tried to cut soda out of their diets, Coca-Cola has
responded by producing low-calorie drinks, presenting nutrition information up front, and not
7
marketing to children under the age of 12. Water quality and risk are the second issue. Water is
the most important ingredient in all of the products, despite the fact that it is a finite natural
resource that is facing enormous worldwide challenges. Coca-Cola has a strong water
management program and is always looking for ways to improve water efficiency. The third risk
that upper management has identified is changing consumer tastes. Coca-Cola is satisfying needs
by offering 500 brands and over 3,800 beverages, since customers have more information than
ever before. To mitigate this risk, Coca-Cola offers 500 brands and over 3,800 beverages.
To summarize, both PepsiCo and Coca-Cola are outperforming their competitors when it
comes to profit margins. The biggest source of concern for Coca-Cola is the company's declining
revenue trajectory, despite increasing profit margins. Coca-Cola Company management should
look into measures to help the company generate more income. Coca-Cola should also lower its
debts and grow its capital in order to raise further funds. Pepsi, on the other hand, has seen good
developments in its liabilities. This is due to the fact that they have decreased dramatically in
recent years. Pepsi should concentrate on ventures that would generate money. Overall, both
organizations are outperforming one other in terms of expanding profit margins. This is
References
reports/2018-annual-report.pdf?sfvrsn=35d1d2bc_2
colacompany.com/content/dam/journey/us/en/policies/pdf/shareowner-services/2018-
annual-report-on-form-10-K.pdf