Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Senior High School Respondents
Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Senior High School Respondents
Characteristics
Age
Male 53 53%
Female 47 47%
Grade
Eleven 25 25%
Twelve 75 75%
Strand
STEM 36 36%
ABM 24 24%
HUMMS 18 18%
GAS 2 2%
ICT 17 17%
Tech-Voc 0 0%
AD 3 3%
Table 1
Table 1 shows the Socio-demographic Characteristics of the Senior High School student
respondents. As can be seen, the age of the respondents is shown to be 15-20 years of age with
male being 6 more than the female respondents. Grade twelve students are more than grade
eleven students with the latter having more than 50, the strand of the respondents is diversified
with STEM having the most representation and ABM close by.
Table 2
15-20 30 100%
21-25 0 0%
26-30 0 0%
31-35 0 0%
36-40 0 0%
41 and above 0 0%
Gender
Male 14 46.67%
Female 16 53.33/%
Year
Third 15 50%
Fourth 15 50%
Fifth 0 0%
Department
CETD 8 26.66%
CEd 3 10%
CoL 0 0%
CNAHS 2 6.67%
CTHRM 0 6.67%
IGSR 0 0%
CCLE 0 0%
RCCE 0 0%
CAFA 0 0%
CBA 7 23.33%
IMS 0 0%
ETEEAP 0 0%
CCS 2 6.67%
CAS 6 20%
IPES 0 0%
Table 3
15-20 0 0%
21-25 2 20%
26-30 4 40%
31-35 2 20%
36-40 1 10%
41 and above 1 10%
Gender
Male 7 70%
Female 3 30%
Department
CETD 3 3%
CEd 1 1%
CoL 0 0%
CNAHS 0 0%
CTHRM 0 0%
IGSR 0 0%
CCLE 0 0%
RCCE 0 0%
CAFA 1 1%
CBA 2 2%
IMS 0 0%
ETEEAP 0 0%
CCS 0 0%
CAS 3 3%
IPES 0 0%
Table 3 shows the Socio-demographic Characteristics of the Teaching Personnel
respondents. As can be seen, ages are varied from 21 and above with 26-30 years old having the
best representation. Gender wise, male having more representation than female with 4 more, and
CETD and CAS tied to have the most representation.
Table 4
15-20 0 0%
21-25 3 30%
26-30 1 10%
31-35 4 40%
36-40 2 20%
41 and above 0 0%
Gender
Male 8 80%
Female 2 20%
Likert Scale
3.25 – 4.00 Strongly Agreed
2.50 – 3.24 Agreed
1.75 – 2.49 Disagreed
1.00 – 1.74 Strongly Disagreed
Table 5
Distribution of responses of Senior High School students according to Goals and Services of the
RFId.
2. RFID helps in monitoring students’ arrival and departure in the school, 3.34
5. RFID gives a fast track for the parents to monitor their child’s appearance
and performance inside the campus. 3.05
Table 5 shows the Distribution of responses of Senior High School students according to
Goals and Services of the RFId. As can be seen, Senior high students collectively agree to the
goals and services target of the RFId system.
Table 6
Distribution of responses of Senior High School students according to Uncertainty and
Deviation of the RFId.
Table 7 shows the Distribution of responses of Senior High School students according to
Reliability, Efficiency, Functionality, and Manageability of the RFId. As can be seen, the
relevance of the RFId system is still enjoyed by the Senior High school students and they
collectively agree that there is a functioning RFId system in place.
Table 8
Distribution of responses of College students according to Goals and Services of the RFId.
Table 8 shows the Distribution of responses of College students according to Goals and
Services of the RFId. As can be seen, unlike the responses of the Senior high school students,
college students tend to have a more varied opinion on the matter that some of them are
disagreeing to some instances where for them the RFId system is lacking on some grounds.
Table 9
Distribution of responses of College students according to Uncertainty and Deviation of the
RFId.
Table 12
Distribution of responses of Teaching Personnel according to Uncertainty and Deviation of the
RFId.
Table 13
Distribution of responses of Teaching Personnel according to Reliability, Efficiency,
Functionality, and Manageability of the RFId.