NSC 13

"iGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS AT~
932054
INACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES

Ill
PHASE II INVESTIGATION
Ill
VOLUME I
Ill
Nash Road Landfill Site No. 932054
Town of Wheatfield Niagara County
Ill
Date: July 1985
Ill
Ill
.
Ill
..
Ill
.
... Prepared for:
Ill
New York State
Department of
,,.
Environmental Conservation
50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233
"' Henry G. Williams, Commissioner
Division of· Solid and Hazardous Waste

"' Norman H. Nosenchuck, P.E., Director
By:
ENGINEERING-SCIENCE
In Association With
.
,
DAMES & MOORE
"'
ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS AT
INACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES
PHASE II INVESTIGATION
- VOLUME I
-- Nash Road Landfill
Town of Wheatfield
Site No. 932054
Niagara County
·~-
Date: July 1985
Prepared for:
New York State
Department of
Environmental Conservation
50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233
Henry G. Williams, Commissioner
Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste

Norman H. Nosenchuck, P.E., Director
By:
ENGINEERING-SCIENCE
In Association With .
DAMES & MOORE
TABLE .Qr CONTENTS
- SECTION PAGE
- I
II
Executive Summary
Purpose
I-1
II-1
- III Scope of Work III-1
- IV Site Assessment
Site Topography
Site Hydrogeology
Regional Geology
IV-1
IV-1
IV-2
IV-2
- Site Geology
Hydrology
Surf ace Water Hydrology
IV-3
IV-8
IV-8
Groundwater Hydrology IV-9
Contamination IV-12
- v Final Hazard Ranking System

Summary
Location
HRS Worksheets
V-1
HRS Documentation Records

EPA Form 2070-13
VI Preliminary Remedial Alternatives and Costs VI-1
Introduction VI-1
Identification of Remedial Methods VI-1
Second Screening of Remedial Actions VI-2
- Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives
Conceptual Cost Estimate
VI-3
VI-5
.... References
Appendix A - Field Procedures
Appendix B - Boring Logs, Well Schematics, and Permeability Test Data
Appendix C - Geophysical Survey Data
Appendix D - Chemical Data
"'
~ .Qf TABLES
TABLE TITLE
-
- III.I
IV .1
Work Plan - Task Descriptions
In Situ Permeability
•• IV.2 Analytical Results for Surface Water Samples
-
-... IV. 3
IV.4
Analytical Results for Sediment Samples
Analytical Results for Ground Water Samples
-- IV.S
VI.l
Results of Metals Analysis for Osterman Well
Identification of Remedial Action Methods
-- VI.2 Preliminary Screening of Remedial Actions
-- VI.3
VI.4
Evaluation of Potential Remedial Alternatives
Summary of Conceptual Remedial Cost Estimate
--
--
--
--
--
...
-
-
•
•
,.
•f
L.l.S.T ill'.. FIGURES
FIGURE TITLE
I.l Site Location Map
I.2 Plot Plan
III.I Plot Plan
III.2 Location of ER Stations
IV .1 Site Location Map
IV .2 Surface Topography
IV. 3 Depth to Bedrock Surface
IV. 4 ER Profile Map (Electrode Spacing = 70 feet)
IV .6 Depth to Top of Till
IV. 7 Lower Sand Isopachs
IV .10 ER Profile Map (Electrode Spacing = 10 feet)
IV.11 Depth to Top of Upper Clay Unit
IV .12 Upper Sand Isopachs
IV.13 Magnetic Contour Map
IV .14 Cross Section A-A'
IV.15 Cross Section B-B'
IV .16 Cross Section A-A' based on down hole gamma logs
IV.17 Cross Section B-B' based on downhole gamma logs
IV .18 Cross Section C-C' based on Electrical Resistivity
Soundings
IV .19 Location of ER Stations
IV .20 Depth to Piezometric Surface in Till
V.ii.l Site Location Map
V.iv.l Plot Plan
SECTION I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Nash Road site is an inactive landfill located in the Town of

Wheatfield, Niagara County (NYS), adjacent to the North Tonawanda
City boundary (Figure I.l). The site is rectangular, totaling
approximately 25 acres. The Nash Road site is located in a
suburban residential area, and is partly overgrown with trees and
marsh vegetation. Nearby residents use the site as a jogging
area, dirt bike track, and play area.
The Nash Road site was operated as a landfill by Niagara

Sanitation Company between 1964 and 1968. Both municipal and
industrial wastes, including caustic materials and sludges, are
disposed at the site. In addition, between 6/6/68 and 7/15/68,
approximately 900 cubic yards of waste material from a sewer
excavation at the Love Canal site was disposed in an excavated
trench on this site (memo of 8/9/78 to Hennessey, NYSDOT).
Although some wastes are covered, protruding refuse is visible

from the ground surface. Current concern centers on the possible
lack of containment of the waste and the migration of these
wastes offsite.
The Phase II investigation included surface water, sediment, and

groundwater sampling and analyses in order to identify the
occurrence and location of contaminants and to assess the
potential hazard associated with the landfill site (Figure I.2).
I-1
Seven onsite groundwater wells were installed and aquifer testing
was performed. Water samples were tes~ed for the 15 Love Canal
indicator parameters (methylene chloride, chloroform, carbon
tetrachloride, benzene, toluene, chlorobenzene, 1,1,2-
trichlo~oethane, tetrachloroethene, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane,
trichloroethene, trichlorobenzene {and isomers), dichlorobenzene
(and isomers), hexachlorobutadiene, total organic halogens and
pH). Sediment samples were tested for the 15 indicator
parameters and for Pb, Cr, Cd, Cu, CN, Hg, Ni, and Zn.
Geophysical surveys and downhole geophysics were used to help
delineate the details of subsurface hydrogeology.
Site stratigraphy can be summarized as follows:

mixed sand/waste fill
silt (MC)
upper sand (SP)
clay (CH and CL with sand seams)
lower sand (SP)
till (GM)
dolomite bedrock
Most waste was mixed with and covered by the upper sand. The
disposal trench for Love Canal waste was excavated through the
sand into the clay unit.
The monitoring well screens were placed in the till and the
silt/upper sand units. The piezometric surface within the fill
shows a groundwater high beneath the north-center part of the
site.
I-2
Surface water samples were found to contain low levels of
methylene chloride and total organic halogens; no other
contaminants were detected. Sediment taken from dried shallow
puddles showed low levels of metals.
Limited analyses of ground water samples from new on-site

monitoring wells indicated no organic contamination. One off site
residential well, approximately 80 feet deep, was analyzed for

all priority pollutants; the analyses show metal contamination.
An earlier USGS study showed metal contamination in the shallow

aquifer.
Based upon the results of this study and previous studies, the
HRS scores for the Nash Road site have been calculated as
follows:
SM = 5.37
SFE = 26.25
soc= 37.50
I-3
v
-
:.=1·.:
..
HJ..!:.~=~=
I ·····.-·······:···..·-·-:.
MOYE/I
. .
ROAb_ • c-0 •
. ·:
• "-" • • • • •
J- .
••••
~
•
t
.N
-------- .-.- · : .I
D • • •••
.. ... . . . .
ROAD
....
...
~
•.
0
.RU!£•.,.._.,,••• - •• ••.
·······:········ ·~· .4f>a
'
..........
I-
: Playgroond
.. Water
.Jank .
I
'·. ""'"-----
!ICALE.
0 1000 zooo 1000 4000 FUT
SITE COORDINATES: 43°04' 10.0 11 N. LAT

78°51' 33.8 11 W. LONG
SITE LOCATION MAP

REHREllCE: U.S.C.S. 7.S' TOPOGRAPHIC HAP
TOHAUANOA EAST, NY (1960) AHO NASH ROAD SITE
TOHAUAllOA WEST, NY (1960) QUAOllANC~(S
DAMliS B MOOR&
FIGURE I.1
.. _ l°1i.1."<:"-oo~·"
f •-'-'I ! j-1 1-1 i-1 i I l l i f f
'
BY .J).\ """"<¥>- CATE ~,f tf
t
~
~ APPROXIMATtr LOCArlON .Or f'rE' BOUNDARY A'
j r ··-··· DITCH:_;...-
--
.. :.;.-_-;_~ -.:.~.: ;::. • so-1
-- - B
OW-AM ··---··
DITCH/ ~ow-1
•> so-2 .
• ....... ,.··
---
·· ... -.a.·"·-
:-~-~~~ •..:.a..-~···:"' ..
~:. ·."
I:-· ·..-
~~~~~~!~~~~;~~;0fii¥
A
~J:.o~-6 PONO
!" - .
•SD-3
-~,~:w-5
ow-*1B
EXPLANATION:
• SEDIMENT SAMPLE
e SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
Cl
)
-$- SAMPLING WELL 0 200 400F'EET.
"'Tl l ow-1·
...... m SCAl.E
G1 UI
c
:;o ~ NOTE I OSTERMAN WELL IS LOCATED
rn ? APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET PLOT PLAN
...... 0 WEST OF SITE.
0 SHOWING CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS
~
I\.)
m NASH ROAD SITE
SECTION II
PURPOSE
Purposes
The Nash Road site is an inactive disposal area containing
municipal wastes and industrial wastes, including waste materials
from a sewer excavation at the Love Canal site. Disposal has
occurred in and above lacustrine sands and clays; there are no
engineered containment facilities on the site.
The purposes of the Nash Road Phase II Site investigation were 1)

to identify the presence and location of any hazardous substance
migrating from the site, 2) to determine if any imminent hazard
exists, 3) to gather necessary information and to complete the
HRS scoring, and 4) to prepare a site investigation report.
II-1
SECTION III
SCOPE OF WORK
Scope .Q.f N.o...t:.k
Phase II investigations at the Nash Road site were begun in June,
1983 in conjunction with Phase I investigation and are ongoing as
of the date of this report. The scope of the investigation was
originally presented in the Phase I report (June, 1983) and later
in the Quality Assurance Project Plan for Nash Road and Sol vent
Chemical Sites (March, 1984). During the performance of the
field investigation, the scope of the work was expanded at the
request of the NYSDEC, in order to obtain a more comprehensive
understanding of the entire Nash Road landfill.
The scope of our investigation is summarized in tabular form on

Table III.l and is summarized below •
.s..t..e.p l =Emergency Evaluation Surface Nater

A surface water monitoring program was implemented in June 1983
to determine if any imminent hazard exists at the site and to
evaluate the movement of surface contaminants in a northerly and
northeasterly direction. Five surface water samples were
collected around the ponds (including trench) and ditch in the
eastern part of the site (see Figure III.l). These samples were
analyzed for the 15 indicator parameters (methylene chloride,
chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, benzene, toluene,
chlorobenzene, 1,1, 2-trichloroethane, tetrachloroethene, 1,1, 2, 2-
tet rachl o roethane, tr ichlo roethylene, tr ichl o robenz ene (and
isomers), dichlorobenzene (and isomers), hexachlorobutadiene,
III-1
total organic halogens, and pH). The procedure for collecting
the samples is discussed in Appendix A. The results of these
analyses are presented in Appendix D and are discussed in Section
IV •
.s.t.e.g 2 =..s..it.e. Investigation

Geophysical Survey (east end) - Resistivity and magnetometer
surveys were performed in late May 1984 to define the boundaries
and depth of the disposal trench, to identify the presence of
buried metal objects, to provide stratigraphic information, and
to evaluate the presence of a contaminant plume. Prior to the
survey, standing water was drained from the site in order to
provide access for the field team.
The magnetic survey of the Nash Road site was conducted using a
40-foot grid pattern over the entire site. A north-south
orientation was used on the traverses across the site. The
magnetic base station was located offsite in a wooded area west
of the site.
The electrical resistivity (ER) survey of the Nash Road site was
conducted using both soundings and profiles. Soundings were
conducted first to a depth of 100 feet in order to interpret
geologic and stratigraphic features. Other soundings were
conducted to a depth of 30 feet and others only as deep as
necessary to distinguish lenses of interest. Profiles were
conducted at electrode spacings of 10, 20, 30, 50, and 70 feet.
III-2
Figure III.2 shows the location of the ER sounding and profile
stations. Field procedures are outlined in Appendix A.
Magnetometer, sounding, and profile field data are included in
Appendix C.
Groundwater Monitoring - A network of five deep and two shallow

groundwater sampling wells was installed in June 1984. The
locations of the wells were chosen to provide information about
the geology of the subsurface and the groundwater flow regime at
the entire Nash Road Landfill (see Figure III.l). Soil was
drilled and sampled from the ground surface to the top of the
bedrock. Stainless steel wells were installed with filter sand
packs, and primary and secondary bentonite seals.
Each well was logged visually during drilling and later with a
downhole gamma logging unit. Additionally, aquifer
characteristics were evaluated by means of in-situ falling head
permeability tests and routine water level measurements. To
further characterize the lithology of the site soils, a grain
size analysis of each soil unit was performed in the laboratory,
according to ASTM D-422-63.
Groundwater samples were taken in July 1984 from the seven

sampling wells and from a nearby unused residential well.
Groundwater samples were analyzed for the 15 indicator
parameters; the chemical analytical results are discussed in
Section IV and listed in Appendix D. All field procedures are
detailed in Appendix A. Boring logs and well schematics and
III-3
grain size analyses are included in Appendix B. Gamma logs are
shown on Figures IV.16 and IV.17.
Sediment Sampling - Sediment samples were collected in July 1984

at three locations in the western part of the site, as shown on
Figure III.I. It was originally planned that surface water would
also be collected at these locations, but no surf ace water was
present on this end of the site at the time of sampling.
Locations of the sampling points are along the western and
northern margins of the site and were chosen to complement the
earlier surface water sampling network and to provide information
about offsite surface movement of contaminants in a westerly and
northerly direction. Sediments are being analyzed for Pb, Cr,
Cu, Cd, CN, Hg, Ni, Zn, and organic priority pollutants. Results
are discussed in Section IV and listed in Appendix D.
Air Survey - An HNU meter survey was performed during July 1984
to evaluate the presence of organic vapor contaminants. No
contamination was detected. The procedure for this survey is
described in Appendix A. Field data is presented in Appendix D.
III-4
TABLE III.l
WORK PLAN - TASK DESCRIPTION
(as implemented)
NIAGARA SANITATION, NASH ROAD
TASKS DESCRIPTION OF TASK
Step 1 - Emergency Evaluation

Perform Surface Water Inspect the site and collect 5
Sampling and Analyses water samples around the disposal
trench. Analyze the samples for
methylene chloride, chloroform,
carbon tetrachloride, benzene,
toluene, chlorobenzene, 1,1,2-
trichloroethane, tetrachloroethene,
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane,
trichloroethene, trichlorobenzene
(and isomers), dichlorobenzene (and
isomers), hexachlorobutadiene,
total organic halogens and pH.
Step 2 - Site Investigation
II-A Update Work Plan Review the information in the Phase
I report, and Step 1 evaluation,
and revise the Phase II work plan.
II-B Conduct Geophysical Conduct EM and resistivity to
Studies define the boundary and depth of
the disposal trench and to provide
hydrogeological information.
II-C Conduct Boring/Install Install 7 stainless steel sampling
Monitoring Wells wells.
II-D Construct Test Pits/ No further construction of test
Auger Holes auger holes necessary.
II-E Perform Sampling and
Analysis
Soil samples from Collect samples during drilling at
borings 5-f oot intervals or at changes in
subsurface lithology. Perform grain
size analysis of each lithologic
unit on site.
Soil samples from No further sampling necessary.
surface soils
Soil samples from test No further sampling necessary.
pits and auger holes
TABLE III.l (cont.)
TASKS DESCRIPTION OF TASK
Sediment samples from Collect 3 sediment samples at the

surface water west end and analyze samples for
Pb, Cr, Cd, Cu, CN, Hg, Ni, Zn, and
a GC/MS organic priority pollutant
scan.
Groundwater samples Collect samples from the 7 new
monitoring wells and analyze for
the parameter listed in Step 1.
Surface water samples No water at west end of site at
time of investigation.
Air samples Using the HNU meter,
determine if organic vapors are
present.
Waste samples No further sampling necessary.
II-F Calculate Final HRS Revise HRS based on the field data
collected in Tasks IIB-IIE,
complete the HRS form.
II-G Conduct Site Prepare final report containing
Assessment Phase I report, additional field
data, final HRS and HRS
documentation records, and site
assessments. The site assessment
will consist of a conceptual
evaluation of alternatives and a
preliminary cost estimate of the
most probable alternative.
II-H Project Management Project coordination, administra-
tion and reporting.
i
•
FILE_
r
l.l.2._o_S -00"\l 1'1
'.- I 1-"1'-'f r-1 1----i j--. I i l I i l
' BY .,Q.T~ DATE ~2/tf
t
~APPROXIMATE" LOCATION ,Or SITE' BOUNDARY A•
1 r ··- ••
• so-2
• -·-
DITCH/-_
. -._~:--..:. -.;~.:- :·
·~-:: ....
:: :'!:·.i....;.
- ··.a.-··--·
• so- 1
-- - B'
ow-Ahl ..DITCH/
---- •• - - -
~ow-1
.- ~-:-•-:-""
. -· -A"'\
:.....'..:i_:. ""-
- ;;;"' ......
~,,
--------
.... -.:...-
~~~f~};=:Y+;J;.~;1
A
w_w-.6
--:..;..~A.·
POND
I
•SD-3 ~OW-5
I
ow-~s
EXPLANATION:
• SEDIMENT SAMPLE
,
0
~
-$-
OW-1
SAMPLING WELL 0 200 400FEET
....11 Ill SCALE

G\
c
::a
rn
"'
= NOTE I OSTERMAN WELL IS LOCATED
i APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET PLOT PLAN
0 WEST OF SITE.
8 ~
Ill NASH ROAD SITE
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
NIAGARA SANITATION - NASH ROAD SITE
LOCATION OF ER STATIONS
P-7
• • • • • • • • • • •
P-6
• • •
P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-13 P-14 P-15
r·-·-·-·-·---·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·•P-1e_.,
I • s--11 &-11 I
I s-10 s-4~ .a.I P-20
I
I
•
s-9
~·
s-tt
P-17 P-21
!~
I I
I •
I.
POND P-19
•\ I s-7
P-18 ~ ·, P-22
• &-2
s-a I
•
&-12
P-23
•
m
UJ
L--·-·-·-·
LEGEND
"" 1"
-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·---~-·-·-·- S-1-·-·-·-·-·-·-·__, ...
X--'
Approximate Location
m
z .A ER SOUNDING STATION l ~ of Site Boundary
.. z
" t::>
;) m • ER PROFILE STATION. ~
- m VAWE IN OHM-FEET -N- P-24
•
- ::1:1
1
D -
"~I 0 200
~~
\)
~
;ii
SCALE FEET
m
SECTION IV
SITE ASSESSMENT
..s..ilg Topography
- The site is an inactive landfill located in the Town of
- Wheatfield, Niagara County, adjacent to the North Tonawanda City

boundary. The site is a rectangular area, twenty five acres in
- size. It is surrounded by a suburban residential area, and is

partially overgrown with trees and marsh vegetation. Dirt roads
...
,
provide access to and within the site.
The landfill is visible to many of the residential neighbors

south of the site. It is used by nearby residents as a jogging
area, dirt bike track, and general play area •
...
Access to the site is open and unguarded. National Fuel Gas

Corporation has a facility adjacent to the western border of the
site. A gas pipeline, a salt-brine pipeline, and above-ground
electrical 1 in es al so pass through the site along the southern
boundary.
Before landfilling began, the site was a swamp area with surface
water drainage to the north toward Sawyer Creek. General surface
features are shown on Figures IV.l and IV.2. Landfilling of
wastes and excavation of a disposal trench (labelled "existing
pond") has resulted in irregular ground surface topography.
Relief on the site is greater than 10 feet.
The volume of onsite surface water fluctuates seasonally. In the
IV-1
spring, approximately one-third of the site is underwater; in
late summer, only the disposal trench and connected ponds are
filled with water. The northern margin of the site is bounded in
most parts by a ditch, which, in the spring, contains surface
water. The large ponds and the disposal trench drain into this
ditch.
During the field activities in May through July, 1984, abundant

- wildlife was observed on the site, including birds,
frogs, turtles.
rabbits,
No human use of surface water was observed.
Groundwater is similarly unused, although an older home adjacent
to the site has a (unused) residential water well. It is
possible that other older homes in the vicinity of the landfill
have residential wells. (Niagara Co. Dept. of Health is unaware
of any other existing wells.) All nearby residents presently are
supplied with municipal drinking water •
.s.i.t& Hydrogeology
Regional Geology
The Nash Road Site is located in the Erie-Ontario Lowlands
physiographic province. The bedrock of this region is
predominantly limestone, dolostone, and shale.
In the recent past, most of New York State, including the site,
has been repeatedly covered by a series of continental ice
sheets. The activity of· the glacier widened preexisting valleys
- and deposited widespread accumulations of till.

ice, ending approximately 12,000 years ago,
The melting of
produced large
IV-2
volumes of meltwater: this water subsequently shaped channels and
deposited thick accumulations of stratified, granular sediments.
-- As glacial ice retreated from the region, meltwater formed lakes
.. in front of the ice margin. This region is covered by lake
- sediments, the most recent being from Lake Tonawanda, an elongate
- lake which occupied an east-west valley and drained north into

Lake Iroquois. The sediments consist of blanket sands and beach
.....
ridges which are occasionally interlayered with lacustrine silts
and clays.
Granular deposits in this region frequently act as shallow

aquifers, whereas lacustrine clays, as well as tills, often
inhibit groundwater movement. However, fine-grained, water-lain
sediments, such as silts and clays, frequently contain horizontal
laminations and sand seams. These internal features facilitate
lateral groundwater movement through otherwise low permeability
materials.
Site Geology
This analysis is based on subsurface information from the
drilling program, downhole gamma logging and geophysical surveys
and sounding of the site. Also used in this analysis were the
USGS shallow borings made in 1982.
Bedrock is Lockport Dolostone, occurring at depths varying from

65 feet to 71 feet below the ground surface. The surface of the
bedrock slopes generally northward (Figure IV.3) and forms a
IV-3
north-trending channel in the center of the site. An ER profile
of the 1e-foot deep surface (Figure IV.4) resulted in electrical
values indicative of bedrock. Values south of the disposal
trench, as seen on Figure IV.4 and all ER profiles are
numerically lower and suggest a wet area.
- A till unit is located immediately above the bedrock surface.

The till is a pink, very dense, silt and gravel with some sand.
- Grain size analyses show silt contents as great as 65%. Gravel
- size increases to the west.

average thickness of 25 feet.
The till blankets the site with an
The 50-foot deep surf ace, which
occurs within the till, has been mapped with ER profiling (Figure
IV.5). The values are relatively consistent, except again for
the low values south of the disposal trench. The top surface of
the till, as shown on Figure IV.6, forms a channel trending
generally northwest, with a maximum relief across the study area
of 17 feet.
Overlying the till is a lower sand unit. A grain size analysis

of the unit indicates that it is a fine sand with approximately
35% silt. This sand unit does not blanket the site, but rather
occurs as a wedge-shaped unit, thickening to the north-center
part of the site (Figure IV. 7). At the western and eastern
margin of the site, the sand unit has a thickness of less than
one foot. An ER profile map of the 3e-foot deep surface (Figure
IV.8), which corresponds approximately with the depth of the
- lower sand, shows lower values south of the trench. Again, these
can be interpreted as an increased water content of the soils in
IV-4
this area. Based on its lithology and stratigraphic position,
- this sand unit is interpreted to be an early deposit of Lake

Tonawanda.
-...
,
Above the lower sand and blanketing the site is a layered "fat"
clay unit which grades vertically into a layered silty "lean"
.. clay. Both of these units contain numerous sand seams •
Hydrometer analyses of these fat and lean clays confirm the
- vertically increasing silt content. These clay units are classic
- examples of Lake Tonawanda deposits, as mapped by Muller (1977).

The most likely mineralogy for the clay minerals is illite. Two
ER profile maps of the 20-foot deep and 10-foot deep surfaces
(both of which are within this clay unit) show, again, an area
south of the trench with distinctly low resistivity values. This.
again is interpreted as the result of increased water content.
Contours on the top surface of the upper clay unit, as shown on
Figure IV.11, show a surface sloping gently north and west;
maximum relief is 3 feet.
An upper sand unit is located immediately above the clay unit, in

all parts of the site except in the northeast corner. This sand
unit varies in thickness from greater than 8 feet in the
southwest to 0 feet in the northeast (Figure IV.12). A grain
size analysis of this unit indicates a fine sand with
approximately 20% silt. This unit probably originated as a late
deposit of Lake Tonawanda.
In the eastern part of this site, the upper sand is overlain by a
IV-5
layered silt. A grain size analysis of this silt shows that it
contains approximately 20% sand and little clay. During testing,
a suspension of this silt was extremely frothy and had a soapy
odor. The occurrence of this fine-grained unit suggests a
possible deepening of the Lake Tonawanda water.

·-
- The uppermost unit on the site is a mixed sand/waste fill. This
unit is defined best from the results of the magnetometer survey.
- Readings on the site were highly variable due to the disturbed

soil, landfill type debris and buried metallic objects. On
...
Figure IV.13, the areas of very high magnetic readings (greater
than 58,000 gammas) are interpreted as buried ferromagnetic metal
objects. The magnetic readings of 57,500 gammas are interpreted
as disturbed soil areas and possibly buried ferromagnetic metal

objects.
The magnetic data indicates that there are five areas on the
landfill that may be underlain by buried ferromagnetic metal
objects. The data also suggest that the landfill has several
distinct areas of disturbed soil, i.e., pits and/or trenches, anq
mixed soil/waste fill. Samples taken during drilling support

this interpretation.
The stratigraphic relationship between the units can be seen on

the cross sections prepared from boring logs (Figures IV.14 and
IV.15). The locations of these lines are shown on the Plot Plan
(Figure III.l). The sand/waste mixed fill covers part of the
ground surface and is underlain by the upper sand or the clayey

....
IV-6
silt. In virgin areas, the ground surf ace is either silt or
sand. Excavation of the disposal trench, not shown on the cross
section, would have exposed the fat clay in the base of the
trench.
Cross sections have also been prepared based on gamma log records
(Figures IV.16 and IV.17). These cross sections show the same
stratigraphy as those based on boring logs, as well as some finer
detail and time lines. For example, peaks A and B are on
approximately horizontal lines suggesting site-wide thin sand
seams within the lacustrine clay. Similarly, peak C corresponds
to the occurrence of the lower sand unit and peak E to the upper
sand and sand/waste fill units. It should be noted that the
gamma log responses of the upper sand unit and the fill/sand unit
are the same due to the presence of the sand. These units are
plotted together on the gamma log cross sections.
A cross section based on ER sounding values has been prepared and

is shown on Figure IV.18. The location of this cross section
line is shown on Figure IV.19. On the cross section, all
lithologic units are discernable. In addition, a "wet zone" is
indicated between depths of 16 feet and 26 feet, sloping to the
north. This ER peak corresponds roughly with the depths of peak
B on the gamma log cross sections and therefore may indicate a
silt or other low gamma count density material. Boring logs (OW-
1 and OW-3) show this depth range to be a very soft wet clay.
- This anomaly is of particu~ar interest to the study because it

coincides with the approximate depth of the disposal trench.
IV-7
Hydrology
- To date, the hydrology of the Nash Road site is known from in-
situ permeability tests, groundwater elevation measurements,
surf ace and groundwater chemical information, and interpretations
.. from the subsurface geology •
-
- Surface Water Hydrology:
The occurrence and location of surface water on the Nash Road
site is variable and seasonal. Most surface water bodies occur

... in small enclosed depressions, less than 3 feet deep. They are
formed by either snow meltwater or rainwater and generally
- disappear, due to evaporation, during the summer months.
in these ponds was observed to be either clear or rust-colored.

Water
Most of these ponds are rimmed with marsh-type vegetation. Due
to their temporal and enclosed nature, no water samples were
taken in these ponds.
In contrast to the small ponds, several large connected ponds,

.. including one which was a disposal trench, are located in the
northeast section of the site and contain water year-round. The

color of this water is clear, with occasional patches of green
floating algae and weeds. The edges of these ponds are rimmed
with marsh-like vegetation. Rusty barrels and other debris can
be seen floating in these ponds. Nearby residents reported to

our field team that these ponds do not freeze in the winter. In
the spring and early sum mer, these ponds drain into a ditch along
the northern margin of the site.
IV-8
Groundwater Hydrology:
..... Permeabilities for the various screened units are shown in Table
IV.I. The magnitudes of the values are typical of the
- corresponding soil lithologies. The till/bedrock interface
- permeability is variable, depending upon the degree of fracture

of the bedrock and the sand and gravel content of the till.
- The piezometric surface within the till is mapped on Figure

IV.29. The configuration of the contours suggests a groundwater
mound be n ea th the cent e r of the s i t e. Thismound may be
attributable to the occurrence of the lower sand unit,
- immediately above the till, acting as a source of recharge for

the till.
The thick, soft clay unit above the lower sand may act as an
.....
aquitard, thus allowing only lateral recharge of the lower sand
unit. Alternately, the clay may be permeable due to its soft
(low density) consistency and layered fabric with numerous sand
seams (see gamma logs). Additionally, the excavation of the
disposal trench removed part of the clay unit and possibly
disturbed the clay floor of the trench during the drag-line
excavation procedure. This activity may have opened a new flow
path by which surface water now may be connected with sand seams
in the clay and possibly with the lower sand unit.
The upper sand unit probably forms a shallow aquifer, although no

wells were placed in this unit. Based on our interpretation of
... the upper clay unit surface geometry (Figure IV.11), we expect
IV-9
that flow direction within the shallow aquifer to follow the
- contours of the underlying clay unit.

been partially
Again, this clay unit has
excavated in the trench, thereby providing a
-- connection between the upper aquifer and trench water, and, by
- extension, possibly into the lower aquifer.
-
-- Contamination
Contamination of the environment within the site boundaries has
•• been evaluated by chemical analyses of surface water, sediment,
...
and groundwater samples and an BNU air quality survey. Migration
of contamination aw~y from the site is assessed by chemical
analyses of surf ace water and one nearby (unused) residential
well, as well as our interpretation of groundwater and surface
- water flow characteristics.
- Surf ace Water Contamination

Water samples from ponds and from the ditch were analyzed in July
1983, as an emergency measure to assess the migration of
contamination off-site via a surface water pathway. The results
of these analyses are shown on Table IV.2. The samples were
analyzed for the indicator parameters. Only very low levels of
total organic halogens and methylene chloride were found. The
ditch water sample had slightly greater levels than any of the
pond and trench samples. This may indicate another subsurface or
surface water source to the ditch, either west or north of the
site. The TOX values (10 ppb and less) could be indicative of
background levels. Alternately, the low levels of methylene
chloride could be due to the laboratory·contamination. These
IV-10
"'
chemical analyses were performed without complete quality
assurance procedures due to the emergency response nature of this
part of the study.
A sample of ponded water was collected by Region 9 DEC on July

11, 1983 and analyzed for GC/MS organics. Two compounds were
identified at low concentrations including: Diethylphthalate
(identified) and Toluene (42.7 ug/l).
From these analyses, no significant surface water contamination

from organic indicator pollutants is believed to exist at the
eastern end of the site.
Sediment Contamination
In the summer of 1984, three sediment samples were taken from
"dried puddles" in the western end of the site (see Figure III.I
for sampling locations). These samples were analyzed for organic
priority pollutants and metals. The results of these analyses
are presented in Table IV.3. Also presented in this table are
ranges of concentrations of metals in non-contaminated.soils.
The values for cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel and zinc
are all within the range of "typical" soils. Also there is no
significant variation between the values for different sampling
locations. Values for mercury and cyanide were not presented in
Friberg, Nordberg and Vouk (1979}; however, the values of cyanide
are less than the detection limit. Mercury was detected at very
1 ow levels. Based on the results of the analysis of these
IV-11
samples, no sediment contamination is believed to exist at the
site.
Groundwater Contamination
Seven on-site monitoring wells and one nearby off-site unused
residential well (Osterman well) were sampled in the summer of
1984. The on-site wells were analyzed for volatile organics,
base/neutral extractable organics, total organic halogens and pH.
.... The results of compounds that were detected are presented on
Table IV.4. Based on the results of these analyses, no
....
significant organic contamination is believed to exist at the
site.
The Osterman well sample was analyzed for priority pollutants

(vol a tiles, acid ex tr a eta bl es, base/neutral extra ctab·l es,
- pesticides/PCBs, metals, cyanides and phenolics). The results of
the analyses for organics that were detected are presented in
Table IV.4. The results of analysis of two samples for metal are
presented in Table IV.5. Only metals that were detected in at
least one of the ground water samples are presented in this
table.
Lead was found in one of these two Osterman well samples at

levels in excess of the New York State Class GA water quality
standard (25 ug/l). However, in the other sample the
concentration of lead was less than the detection limit. Cadmium
was detected in both samples. The concentration in one of the
samples was at the water quality limit (10 ug/l) and the
IV-12
concentration in the other sample was less than the water quality
limit. The concentrations of other metals were below water
quality limits. It should be noted that the analytical results
...
presented in Table IV.5 are total metals on unfiltered samples
and that the monitoring well samples were not analyzed for
metals. Additional sampling is required to determine if metals !...
- contamination exists at the site and to determine whether or not

the contamination is migrating from the site.
... Air Contamination

An HNU air quality survey was performed in the summer of 1984 and
nor airborne organic contaminants were detected.
...
,
- IV-13
TABLE IV.l
Summary
In-Situ Permeability
Well Permeability cm/sec
ow-1 4.37 x le-4 silt

OW-2 6.75 x le- 4 silt and sand
OW-lB 8.43 x le- 7 till/bedrock
ow-3 1.43 x 10- 6 wet zone in till
OW-4 7.88 x le- 7 till/bedrock
OW-5 7.5 x le- 4 till/bedrock
OW-6 6. 8 x le- 4 till/bedrock
TABLE IV.2
Analytical Results for Surface Water Samples
Parameter (ug/l) SW-1 SW-2 sw-3 SW-4 SW-5
Methylene Chloride 11 <10 10 <10 <10

Chloroform <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Carbon Tetrachloride <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Benzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Toluene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Chlorobenzene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
l,l,2,2,-trichloroethane<l0 <10 <10 <10 <10
Tetrachloroethane <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
1,1,2,2,-tetrachloro-
ethene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Trichloroethene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Trichlorobenzene
(isomers) <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Dichlorobenzene
(isomer) <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Hexchlorobutadiene <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
pH 6.9 8.1 7.1 7.4 7.4
Total organic halogens 10. 5. 7. 7. 8.
(See Figure III.l for location of sampling points)
f
' t f. I t I l j I i I i
TABrE IV. 3
Analytical Results( l for Sediment Samples
Sample No. Range of Concentration

Parameter (ug/g) SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 in non-contaminated soils( 2 l
-------------------------------- -------------------------------
Cadmium ll. 3 ll < .2 < .2 <l
Chromium 6.8 6.3 5.6 trace to 251l
Copper 5.7 8.2 l ll. ll 2 to 100
Lead 18. 7. ll 14. 2 to 200
Mercury 0. 0084 0.064 0. 010 (3)
Nickel 6.5 8.5 9.4 3 to 1,000
Zinc 40. 34. 48. lll to 300
Cyanide <l <l <l (3)
(1) Samples were analyzed for volatile organics, acid and base/neutral extractable
organics and pesticides/PCB's. All results for organics analysis were less than
detection limits
(2) Source: Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, Edited by L. Friberg, G. F. Nordberg
and v. Vouck, 1979.
(3) No information for this parameter available in Friberg, Nordberg, and vouk (1979)
(See Figure III.l for location of sampling points)
("
TABLE IV .4
ANALYTICAL RESULTS (ORGANICS AND pH) FOR.GROUND WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Osterman Osterman
Parameter OW-1 OW-lB ow-2 ow-3 OW-4 ow-5 OW-6 FT-1 Well Property OST-1
-----------------
Methylene Chloride
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ND ND ND ND ND ND 15 ND ND ND 14
(ug/ll
Toluene (ug/l) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND <6.0 ND ND
1,1,1,-
trichloroethane ND <3.8 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
(ug/l)
Butylbenzylphthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 33
(ug/l)
Total Organic
Halides (mg/l) <0.02 <0.02 0.04 0.04 0.09 <0.02 0.12 -- 0.04
pH 8.05 8.14 8.12 8 .11 8.14 8.16 8,07 6.45 8.20
ND = Not Detected
TABLE IV.5
Results of Metals Analysis
For Osterman Well
Sample Identification
Osterman Class GA Water
Parameter Property OST-1 Quality Standards
------------ --------- -------- -----------------
Total Cadmium (ug/l) 6 10 10
Total Copper (ug/l) 13 10 1,000
Total Zinc (ug/l) 258 50 5,000
Total Lead (ug/l) <5 140 25
Total Mercury (ug/l) <0.5 0.8 2
·--:
'!
; Playgro0nd
f: ~ " ... .-+:--r----······-·---//.~-

. .
r ::
~~-~
~ 0
::
.;;
.
-..""
•·
'
ST
• llOW
SCALI!:
o 1000 :rooo 4000 l'CCT
i:::===:JE===3=====:::i~==:3
1
SITE COORDINATES:. 43°04 10.0 11 N. LAT
78°51' 33.8 11 W. LONG
SITE LOCATION MAP

REFERWCE: U.S.G.S. 7.S' TOPOGAAPHIC: KAP
TOHAWAHDA EAST, HY (1980) AHO NASH ROAD SITE
TONAWANDA VEST, NY (1960) QUADRAHC~t~
DAM•& B MOORE
FILE {}}:.,_,, ~) J, 1
BY 0 ·~ DATE 7(z.:;;{'t'f
I r.
i
.. .. ••....--:
DITCH_/.
-·- -
~APPROXIMATE' LOCATION OF SITE' ~~UNOARY
ow-.~
EL. - 0.37 '-f' - .......
DITCH_/
••
.~ OW-2
EL
..-2.34'
"$$
ow-10
:..:-·
low-1
·· EL -r 26'
~~/--------
FORMER
ow-s POND
FORMER
EL.+ I.I'
POND
~~W-5 BENCHMARK -DATUM EL.o.o'
ow-3...._ 1
EL.-0.66' -i:::Jlr!
II 0 200 400FEET
11 I
....
G'l
c •
GI
SCALE
:0
m I
SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY
8
I NASH ROAD SITE
Note: Elevation values in feet relative to
~N._
I _____________________________________________________________________________.
arbitrary datum
. . . , I .:
FILE J33o.S. ~oo'l(l!j "

}
BY..()~ oATE z/es 1w
tN
16,9 ~ . ~APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SITE 8~~NDARY
DITCH--'
••
~
ow-'!..I:.. • . . .••-- .> -.•.

_.,_
._;_~~~~~. ~~ 'I" .. _:~.~-~4--·~4·,_~
----.. ,___, '"' :c-:-.~
<a~
6J"
II 0 200 400 FEET
II
11
....
Cl
c
•
OI
SCAl.E
:a I
rn II DEPTH TO BEDROCK SURFACE
~ I
Note: Values in feet below arbitrary datum.
NASH ROAD SITE
UJ
NIAGARA SANITATION -NASH ROAD SITE
ER PROFILE MAP
(Electrode Spacing =70 feet)
P-6 P-7
•
P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 • • P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15
rI ·-·---~---~---~--~---.!--~'!!.2?..J~7.!;_5!_.!...-~---~---'!-.Jl
I
(182) (175) (192.5) (175) (178.5) (198) (192.5) (199.5)~205.8)
P-16
•
..w..cJR.8>
c1eo.1s>
-
•P-20
(2! •
4 > (188.3)
I 1 •
I
~
I ; P-21
I
,.
P-17
I
• POND P- 19
1•
(224)
I
(184.5) •
(168) I P-22
•
I
P-18
(188) I (231)
P-23
•
(198)
m
rnm
z
Q
A
L--·-·-·-·- ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·---·-·-·-· ---·-·-·-·-·
LEGEND
ER SOUNDING STATION
.
l
.J
v Approximate Location
of Site Boundary
z
m • ER PROFILE STATION, ~
m VALUE IN OHM-FEET -N-
•
:a P-24
~
z
Q
I 0 200 (186.2)
~ SCALE FEET
~m
t i i I l I l I i i
ER PROFILE MAP
(Electrode Spacing =50 feet)
P-6 P-7
• •
P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 • • P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15
r ·-·-·-f!---~---~--~·-· ·--~!!>~-~1~>--~--~---~---~- ..U'L.tfo>

(147.5) (152.5) (147.5) (137.5) (150) (150) (155) (160)\\ (147) P-16.
(157.8) (155)
•
(157.5) P-20
• •
P-21
•
P-17
P-19
(130) (185)
(115)
•
P-22
•
P-18
(197.5)
(135)
I
I
I
I
•
P-23
I
v -·-·-·-·-·-
(120)
L----·-·-·-· -·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· -·-·-· 1'

m LEGEND
UJ
m
z
C'>
.A. ER SOUNDING STATION l of Site Boundary
"Tl z
..... m
• ER PROFILE STATION, ~
m VALUE IN OHM-FEET - N-
•
G) JJ P-24
~
c-
;o ~
m, 0 200 (160.5)
en SCALE FEET
.~~m
U1
~
I -, FILE
} i i
I) 35
'
•c::>O)
.
I l'j
i I l i I i I j I i i
BY ~ ·~ DATE 7/"Zs{N
~
~APPROX/MAT£'
1 r·~-·~,~_:; H
ow-~
FORMER
POND
...... _,
40
II 0 200 400 FEET
II
.,, " SCAt.E
......
°'
§ I00
m DEPTH TO TOP OF TILL
I Note: Values in feet below arbitrary datum.
~ I NASH ROAD SITE
<
"' ............................................................................................................................................................
l l --·1 I I I i
FILE ! 7> '"!\,.. <,, -r::;:.o ·:fS.'/t <"j
BY D.-::):N.a,.a. DATE :Z/"?r5 {'Cf
~N
I
••
'
,1~0~-·2 ~low-1
QW-18
I .-· _;;,~.-:~
..
~~;.~-.:;~. ... _.__ . ..;;...
~~i;.:
row-s
I
0
,a
I 0 200 400 FEET
II
It SCAL.E
OI
I0 LOWER SAND ISDPACHS

I NASH ROAD SITE
II
Note: Values in feet
I I I t I If Iii JI iii I I
ER PROFILE MAP
(Electrode Spacing = 30 feet)
P-6 P-7
• •
P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 • • P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15
. - .- . _f!_. - ~- .-~ - .~- - ..!. _<J:!:~>.J~2~5~ .!. .- ~- ·-~- .- ~- ..u'1-

_ j1'.9) (99)
r (90) (112.5) (115.5)
.
(97.5) (109.5) (120) (123) (132>\\ (138)
P-16
•
(131)
•
(123} P-20
(123)
I P-21
P-17 ~
• POND P- 19
1•
(129)
I
(93) •
(78) I P-22
•
P-18
(88.5)
1•
I
I (138)
I P-23
I
I •
(114).
v
I
L-----~·-·- --·-·-·-·--·-·-·-·-·-·---·-·- ·-·-·-·-----· _I

m Approximate Location
en LEGEND
m
z
Q
... ER SOUNDING STATION i of Site Boundary
.fl -~ • ER PROFILE STATION, ~
:'Im VALUE IN OHM-FEET - N- P-24
•
- :XI
~
0z
fl Q
I 0 200 (116.4)
~~z
SCALE FEET
XI ()
m
I I l l l I i l I I I l I I
ER PROFILE MAP
(Electrode Spacing = 20 feet)
P-6 P-7
• •
P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 • • P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15
.- .- ._4!t_. - ~- . -~ - . .!. - .~. - ~!!:~ - ~~>. _ .!. __ !t_. _(125)}~141)

! _. - ~- ..utl.... ti> (126)
r
I (110) (99) (100) (89) (103) (107) l (97) P- 18 •
(124.8)
I <110> • P-20
I 1 •
I : <113>
I
P-21
•
I
P-17
l
I 1•
(74) \::)99 I <122).
(47) I P-22
•
I
P-18
1•
I (126)
(83)
P-23
•
(78)
m
UJ
m
z
G)
.....
L--·-·-·-·- ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·---·-·-·-·-·-----·-·-·-·-·-
LEGEND
ER SOUNDING STATION 1
v Approximate Location
.of Site Boundary
z
m • ER PROFILE STATION. ~
m VALUE IN OHM-FEET -N- P-24
•
:D
~
z
G)
I 0 200 (84.6)
en
(") SCALE FEET
m
z
(")
m
i I
' i
' i l 1 If 1 f i t
ER PROFILE MAP
{Electrode Spacing = 1o feet)
P-6 P-7
• •
P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 • • P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15
r ·-·---~---~---41!--~---~--~~~-~ 1~>._!_ __ !9___~---~--W';L.tfo> (177.5) (194.5)

I (90) (86) (86) (75) (98.5) (114) (146) ( 146) (183.5)P....16. I
I ~~ '1P-ro
!
I
i(124.5)
•
P-17 I P-21
e
(48)
P....1e
•
e
I1(138.5)
(55) I p....22
•
•
P-18
1•
,(146.5)
(79.75)
I
•
I
I
P-23
•
(55)
I
I
I
11 z
m
m
m
.... G'>
~
L--·-·-·- ·-·--·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·- ·-·-·-·---·-·-· _1'
LEGEND
ER SOUNDING STATION l
: v Approximate Location
of Site Boundary
~z
-m • ER PROFILE STATION. ~
-m VALUE IN OHM-FEET -N-
•
;lJ ll P-24
m-z
.~~
-iii
(') SCALE
0 200
FEET ~ (91.5)
0 z
(')
l'TI
f'IL.E ·) l D!:. , ~ f /'i
j
.i l
BY D ; \t:::2'(Y\ ?· • D.ATE 7/ '-~/ J=t.( .;
~ 8
7 6 5
! r •• •• DITCH:_,- - - _
~APPROXIMATE' LOCATION OF SIT£' B~~N=
ow-4 DITCH__,,,
_..,_. l . · ow-2 ~low-1
~ ... -~.
I: .,.,.
,,~.,
- ...... -,_*f
:
:~Zf?
_____ ._________
.-.:~ ..... _.
- ow-1 s -
• ,;,.-. ;,..<# ~:...-- -
-
. -"":
8 FORMER
POND
c ---~ --..·
- ~ow~s
7
6
5
II 0 200 400FE:E:T
II
11 I
.... SCAl.E
~ I
:0
I
11 8 DEPTH TO TOP OF UPPER CLAY UNIT
I NASH ROAD SITE
~ • Note: Values in feet below arbitrary datum •
i
FILi: f3>3 r~'> -· ei:oib
BY ~~ - D.ATE1ft.S.['t't
tN ~
0
6
"' APPROXIMATE' LOCATION OF SITE' BOUNOARY
··---- DITCH_} • • - - -
ow-~
--DITCH
:_
. ~.i:t:·
. ........
·::~}!~tfi-
•• . ;,;;.··. ~ "
··~:~~--:.... ....
i~~~f&i?~-
FORMER
ow-s POND
.. ---~~
~~-?
?.,
,a
I
0 200
" 400FEET
••
n
~
SCALE
~
I
0
n I
0 UPPER SAND ISOPACHS
0
~ I NASH ROAD SITE
• Note: Values in feet
MAGNETIC CONTOUR MAP
r·--~~----·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·- -·-·-·-·1
Base
Station
~p o q,..
a
~ct=
~ I
l 0\) ,9, 9i o) • .
0- ~ \ ,.,c2, r.··" 9 .. \• (I
'·~ '-0-"') ~.. 0 •" :· \( "'"-i!
! ~·r0 0
L--·-·-·-·-·-·=·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-~7~~--~;;0-;i;;;e"L.~;a~;;;~
'I
m
UI i . '\/ of Site Boundary
m LEGEND ~
~i
!!
·z
: (.')
-57- MAGNETIC CONTOUR
VALUE x 1000 GAMMAS
0 200
I
-N-
~ SCALE....___ _ ___.
I~ NOTE: Shading indicates area of very high
~ magenetic reading (>58,000 gammas)
m .._______;;._................~...;.....;...;........;..........;...............................................................................................................................
....
IF"
A z .., A'
·o ·a
m ~ ;
WEST N
Q Q
-0
... EAST
...u
Ill
...u
Ill
Q
..,
Ill
0
..,
Ill
0
...u
Ill
a: a: ..,
-
Ill
U>
I
~
A.
I ()
I
-
A.
v
0
ti:
A.
m
I
-
0 ~ N
~
0 0 I
0 ~ ~GRAY AND BROWN MOIST

MIXED SAND/WASTE FILL 0
'""'-"' _.. SILT AND CLAY
~-
10
---
--
""'
GRAY WET MEDIUM TO FINE SAND,
TRACE SILT
...___
- --
"'-
GRAY AND BROWN MOIST

LAYERED CLAY AND SILT
=rr
~
-- _..
--- -::::.--
I
~
Id
....
"'(
cI
20
-- - -
GRAY MOIST
J "'
j
~
~
I.&...
~
- LAYERED CLAY
~I
j
30
......
I -- - -
:i:::
I
1
~
I
I
Q
"'~
~
- ----
-----
I 40
-
~
Ii: D1 I
GRAY WETIIMEDIUM TO FINE SAND,
#
....,,_,
......__
TRACE SILT
. - - 0
L______________
200
HORIZONTAL SCALE
400 FEET
""-"
50 I- """ "-
BROWN MOIST SILT, SOME COARSE TO
FINE SAND, SOME FINE TO COARSE
,..,,_...
GRAVEL, TRACE OF CLAY --._
""'-
""-
-"'--
-.....
---
60 "- .........
- SCREENED INTERVAL
1'0
DOLOSTONE BEDROCK - - -- CROSS SECTION
DOLOSTONE BEDROCK A-A'
NASH ROAD SI
DAM•SBMOOR•
FIGURE TIZ:. 14
"'
• B B'
SOUTHEAST NORTHWEST
,.,., v
I
I
311:
311: 0
0
- 0
--
MIXED SAND/WASTE FILL
l ._
----
.___-=::::===;::--: . ~ ~ .....__s- GR~Y AND BROWN MOIST
10
""'"' ........
-- --
-
- --
. GRAY WET MEDIUM TO FINE SAND,
GRAY AND BROWN MOIST

LAYERED CLAY AND SILT
TRACE SILT
"\..-
·. ~ ·-
---
---:-- LAYERED SILT AND CLAY
- "'"'-"' ...,,
- --- ------ - -
........ -........
-
~
20
- - ---- GRAY MOIST LAYERED CLAY
----- --- --
----
.....
...
~
I.(
·':-..
·----- -
-----
'( -v
c ~ 30
......
::i::
..... ,._
()
~
~
40
- ------- - - --
GRAY WET MEDIU~
"-' """' · TO FI NE SAND,
""" TRACE SILT
/\..-
J
J
- >- BROWN MOIST SILT, SOME COARSE TO FI~E SAND,
~ m
50
SOME FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL, TRACE OF CLAY
""-"
--- ----- 0 200 400 FEET
A.- 0• SCREENED INTERVAL
c:=:::::::i:==~==========i
HORIZONTAL SCALE
-
60
~
-
--
"'""
"'
""'
7'0
CROSS SECTION
DOLOSTONE BEDROCK
s-s'
NASH ROAD SITE
DAM•& B MOORR
FIGURE Tir. 15
~"'
A z A'
" WEST N
0
Cl)
...
0
<n
0
S!
EAST
co
l-
o ...
0
I-
I ...
U') ...
o Vo m
~
I
I ~
~:: ~~
- o-
0 Q IL
0
UPPER SAND
AND
MIXED SAND/WASTE FILL E E
LEAN CLAY
10
• • • • • • • • ~
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••
s
•
.....
l4J
20
~ ... ... - • • • • • • • • • • • • ... • • . . . . . . ..
• • • • • _
- - • •
~
<'!
......
.. ... . .. . . . . .. •
. .. .. . . . . • • ..
~
.....
(\..
l4J
t::I
30 • • • •••••
FAT CLAY
-
~
~
......
~
- ==iii - -
40
~
"::(
---::::rrro-
50 ~o--
0 200 400 FEET
TILL HORIZONTAL SCALE
60
CROSS SECTION A - A'

70 BASED ON DOWNHOLE GAMMA LOGS
NASH ROAD SITE
DAMmS&MOORm
FIGURE IV. 16
"
• B B'
SOUTHEAST NORTHWEST
1") vI
I
3': 3=
- 0 0
0
- =- MIXED SAND/WASTE FILL
LEAN CLAY
10
• • •
• . • ..• . - • • . . •
FAT CLAY
. - ... ... • . ...
• • • • - • • • • •
.
20
• • •
•
• • . • • . - • • • . • . . . , ..... • • • • .• . . •
..... • •
~
4..
• • - • • .. . • • • . . .. . . •
~
• • - • • - • • • • . • • . . . . ..
~
Q..
30 • . • ... • • ....... . •
• •
~
• . . . • . • •
~ • .. ..
~
......
~
40
~
Cl
"t
50
0 200 400 FEET
HORIZONTAL SCALE
60
CROSS SECTION B - B'

70 BASED ON DOWNHOLE GAMMA LOGS
NASH ROAD SITE
DAMBS8MOORE
FIGURE IV.17
,,
"'
c C'
5-'-2 5-9 3 S-5
.: [ FILL
I-
UJ
UJ
u..
z.....
20
LEAN CLAY
WET ZONE -L -
---- -
\9
I
I-
Cl..
UJ
Cl
UJ
30
40
FAT CLAY
-
~ -
---- ----
------------
z
.....
I-
<(
LOWER SAND
u ::E
<( .....
Cl.. x
fJl 0 50
0::
_J Cl..
--
<( Cl..
u
.....
0::
I-
u
<(
0
I-
60 r- ) TILL
I
UJ \9
_J z
UJ ..... 70
Cl
z
0
Cl..
fJl
UJ
80
BEDROCK
0::
0::
0
u
I I I
90
100
0 800 1600 FE£T
HORIZONTAL SCALE
0 200 400 OHM/ FEET
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY
HORIZONTAL SCALE
CROSS SECTION C - C'

BASED ON ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SOUNDINGS
NASH ROAD SITE
DAM•SBMOOR•
FIGURE IV, 18
LOCATION OF ER STATIONS
P-6 P-7
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-13 P-14 P-15
r·-·-·-·-·---·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-··P-16£.,
I . . . . S-11 I
S-10 S-3 P-20
!I $-4~~-
.A. 81
I S-9 I P-21
• POND P-19 !~
•\· I s-1
P-18 ~ 1' P-22
• S-2 I •
s-a I
s-12
....
•
P-23
m
[I)
"'ez ...
L--·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·
LEGEND
ER SOUNDING STATION l
v .
~1-·-·---·-·-·-·
of Site Boundary
.....i
::7C
ii
.... z • ER PROFILE STATION, ~
G'I ~ VAWE IN OHM-FEET - N•
•
c ::D P-24
:oz
m e>
.~n
I
SCALE
0 200
FEET 1
... "'
~
'° "'
:- I >·..... • f't
BY 0~.oAf..= DATE 1/z S()d
~~""'
t
I
./,;
'¢>
r···- '
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SITE BOUNDARY
" ....
II 0 200 400FEET
n I
... II SCALE
i'l
0
n
•I DEPTH TO PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE IN TILL
~
i
I Note: Values in feet below arbitrary datum. NASH ROAD SITE
~
) ...................................................................................................................................................................
~
FINAL HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
for
Niagara Sanitation Landfill
Nash Road
Town of Wheatfield
Niagara County, New York State
The 25-acre site is an inactive landfill in the Town of
Wheatfield, Niagara County (NYS) adjacent to the North Tonawanda
City boundary. It is located in a suburban residential area, and
is partly overgrown with trees and marsh vegetation. Nearby
residents use the site as a jogging area, dirt bike track, and
play area. The landfill was operated by Niagara Sanitation
Company between 1964 and 1968. Both municipal and industrial
wastes, including caustic materials and sludges, are disposed at
the site. In addition, between 6/6/68 and 7/15/68, approximately
900 cubic yards of waste materials from the excavation of a sewer
line at the Love Canal site were disposed in an excavated trench
on this site (memo of 8/9/78 to Hennessy, NYSDOT).
Although some wastes are covered, protruding refuse is visible on

the ground surface. For the Phase II study, several surf ace
water, sediment and groundwater samples were chemically analyzed
for a limited number of contaminants. Sediment was found to
contain low levels of metals. No organic contaminants were found
in the groundwater or surface water. A USGS (1982) investigation
identified metal contamination in the shallow aquifer; current
concern centers on the possible lack of containment of the waste
and the migration of contaminants off-site. At the present time,
no cleanup or enforcement actions are ongoing.
v
-----
~1
o• ·•••
]~ :
-·.e •• ........
llOA~ • . .:
.. ....·..:..•••~.+. . ~. T
.. .. . .e-_a: 1
o" •
.. .
Gf[I.
=...........
.. .... . .. .
llOAD
. .
•.
·..
llU!E.-·- ...• _ • • .
: ................~•• -ta
~
•I
! t I
.. ;Playgrooml-'I' ~i.1-
.• Waler · ~, ~
eiank .
7": ----.--
~.;)V:/~~~~~~~~~~~'='1
.~ .-+:--;'------~~-++---=-'[~+-':--
...
! . ..•.
,.... ;:
·i!
...
~-~"=='"'==== 0 ..
,
llCAU:
0 tOOO •ooo rctT
SITE COORDINATES: li3°ot,' 10.0" N. LAT

78°51' 33.8" W. LONG
SITE LOCATION MAP

P.EHl!EllC£: u.s.G.5. 7,5• TOPOGRAPHIC KAP
TOHAVAHOA EAST, HY (1980) ANO NASH ROAD SITE
TONAVAHOA VEST, HY (1980) QUAOl\AHGLtS
DAMESBMOORE
f='Tr.llRI= \T ii 1
HRS COVER SHEET
NASH ROAD LANDFILL
TOWN OF WHEATFIELD
Person(s) in charge of the facility: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ed Greinert
Town Supervisor
Town of Wheatfield, N.Y.
Name of Reviewer: Eileen Gilligan 11/8/84
General description of the facility:

(For example: landfill, surface impoundment, pile, container; types of
hazardous substances; location of the facility; contamination route of major
concern; types of information needed for rating; agency action, etc.)
Landfill used by Niagara Sanitation 1964-1968 for both municipal and
industrial wastes. Waste materials from the excavation of a sewer at the
Love Canal site disposed on the site in 1968. Improperly closed, rubbish
visible. Phenols, lead, and organics found in soil and groundwater samples.
Scores: SM = 5.37 (Sgw 5.65S

SW
= 7. 38 sa = o.o )
SFE = 26.25
SDC = 37.50
l'"I RS COVER SliEET

Faci 1 i ty Name: Nash Road Lan~d~f~i~l~l~~~~ Date:~~l_l_l~B-1~8~4.__~~~
Surface Water Route Work Sheet
Rating Factor Assigned Value Multi- Max. Ref.

(Circle One) p Ji er Score
Score (Section)
OJ Observed Release <iJ 45 1 0 45 4. 1

If observed release is given a value of 45. proceed to 1 i ne m.
If observed release is given a value of 0, proceed to 1 ine m. v
II] Route Characteristics 4.2
Facility Slope and @ 1 2 3 1 0 3
Intervening Terrain
1-yr. 24-hr. Rainfal 1 0 1 G> 3 1 2 3
Distance to Nearest 0 1 2 Q) 2 6 6
Surface Water
Physical State 0 1 2 G) 1 3 3
I Tota 1 Route Characteristics Score 11 15

- []] Containment 0 1 2 Q) 1 3 3 4.3
.. (I] Waste Characteristics 4.4
Toxicity/Persistence 0 3 6 9 12 15 @ 1 18 18
Hazardous Waste 0 1 2 3 4 5C€)7 8 1 6 8
Quantity
I Total Waste Characteristics Score 24 26
w Targets 4.5
~ C9
Surface Water Use 0 3 '
3 6 9
Distance to a Sens i ti ve @) 3 2 0 6
Environment
Population Served/ @4 6 8 10 1 0 40
Distance to Water 12 16 18 20
Intake Downstream 24 30 32 35 40
I Total Targets Score 6 55
11] If 1 i ne OJ is 45, multiply OJ x rn lilx

,./If 1 i ne OJ is 0, mu 1t i p I y [TI x Wx Wx (I] 4752 64,350
[]] Divide tine W by 64,350 and multiply by 100 sSW = 7.38
SURFACE WATER ROUTE WORK Sl-IEET

- Facility Name: Nash Road Landfill Date:
Ground Water Route Work Sheet

....
(Circle One) Score
p 1 i er Score (Section)
[JJ Observed Release 0 @ 1 45 45 3. 1
If observed release is given a score of 45, proceed to 1 i ne ~v
"'"
If observed release is given a score of 0, proceed to line [I]
, .. 0 Route Characteristics 3.2

Depth to Aquifer of 0 1 2 3 2 6
Concern
Net Precipitation 0 1 2 3 1 3
Permeability of the 0 1 2 3 1 3
Unsaturated Zone
Physical State 0 1 2 3 1 3
.... I Total Route Characteristics Score 15
w Containment 0 1 2 3 1 3 3.3
lIJ Waste Characteristics 3.4
... Toxicity/Persistence 0 3 6 9 12 ®~ 1 18 18
Hazardous Waste 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 1 6 8
Quantity
I Total Waste Characteristics Score 24 26
w Targets 3.5
Ground Water Use 0 2Ci) 3 3 3 9
Distance to Nearest
Wel I/Population
@ 4 6
1 16 18
8
20
10 1 0 40
Served 24 30 32 35 4o
~ If 1 i ne [JJ is 45 , mu I t i p I y OJ x [}] x []
v If 1 i ne OJ is 0, mu 1tip1 y [I]x[f]x [}] x w 3240 57.330
W Div i de l i ne ~ by 57.330 and multiply by 100 sgw = 5.65
GROUND WATER ROUTE WORK Slzf EET

Facility Name: Nash Road Landfill
Air Route Work Sheet
Assigned Value Multi- Max. Ref.

Rating Factor Score
(Circle One) plier Score (Section)
[jJ Observed Release @ li 5 t 0 45 5. 1
Date and Location: July 1984 Air Quality Survey
Sampling Protocol: HNU survey
If 1 i ne OJ Is 0, the S = 0. Enter on 1 ine

a [I] . i/
If line [] is 45, then proceed to line 0 .
[}] Waste Characteristics 5.2
Reactivity and o 1 2 3 1 3
Incompatibility
Toxicity o 1 2 3 3 9
Hazardous Waste a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 8
I Total Waste Characteristics Score 20
mTargets 5,3
Population Within a 9 12 15 18 1 30
4-Mile Radius 21 24 27 30
Distance to Sensitive o 1 2 3 2 6
Environment
Land Use o 1 2 3 1 3
I Total Targets Score 39
II] Multiply OJ x [}Jx [I] 35' 100
[]] Divide line I}] by 35, 100 and multiply by 100 sa = 0
AIR ROUTE WORK SHEET

\
Facility Name: Nash Road Landfill Date:~8~/_1~3/~8_4~~~~~~-
·1 Direct Contact Work Sheet

- Assigned Value Multi-
... Rating Factor
(Circle One) p 1 i er Score Max. Ref.
Score (Section)
"'
... w Observed Incident CiJ 45 1 0 45 8. 1
If 1 i ne . w is 45. proceed to line fil
-
~
If Ii ne w is O, proceed to 1 ine WV
...
. [fl Accessibility 0 1 2
0 1 3 3 8.2
. [IJ Containment 0 ® 1 15 8.3
[I] Waste Characteristics
Toxicity 0 1 2© 5 15 15 8.4
...
~ Targets 8.5
- Population Within
1-Mi le Radius
Distance to a @
0 1 2
1 2 3
0 4 5 4
4
12
0
20
12
... Critical Habitat
ffiJ If Ii ne OJ is 45, multiply [J]x m x w

If Ii ne DJ is 0, mu 1t i p I y [fl x IIJ
x [£! x w 8100 21 , 600
....
W Divide I ine ffiJ by 21,600 and multiply by 100 5
oc = 37.50
DIRECT CONTACT WORK SHEET

Facility Name: ~--'--=-___::_;==-~===-=-==---~
Nash Road Landfill Date: 8/] 3/84___ _ __
Fire and Explosion Work Sheet

....
Score
(Circle One) plier Score (Section)
ITJ Containment 1
CD 1 3 3 7. 1
[L] Waste Characteristics 7.2
~ 11 22 cb
Direct Evidence 1 0 3
lgnitability 1 3 3
~
Reactivity 3 1 0 3
Incompatibility 1 2 3 1 0 3
Hazardous Waste 0 2 3 4 5 ({)7
1 8 1 6 8
Quant I ty
I Total Waste Cha rac te r is ti cs Score 9 20
llJ Targets 7.3

Distance to Nearest 0 1 2 Ci) 4 5 1 3 5
Population
Distance to Nearest
Building
0 0 2 3 1 1 3
Distance to Sensitive
Environment
CV 1 2 3 1 0 3
Land Use 0 1 Q) 3 1 2 3
Population Within
2-Mi le Radius
0 1 2 3 GJ 5 1 4 5
... Buildings Within

2-Mile Radius
0 1 2 3 G5 1 4 5
-·
[I] Multiply [!] x [1J x[l] 378 1. 440
w Divide line [I] by 1,440 and multiply by 100 SFE = 26.25
FIRE AND EXPLOSION VJORK

Nash Road Landfill Date=~~l_l~/_8~/_8_4~~~~~~
Worksheet for Computing SM
s s2
Groundwater Route Score (s ) 5.65 31.92

gw
Surf ace Water Route Score ( s ) 7.38 54.53

SW
- Air Route Score (S )

a
o.o 0.0
52 + s2 + 52 86.45
gw SW a
I s2
gw
+ 52
SW
+ 52
a
9. 30
.... v s2
gw
+ 52
SW
+ $2
a
I 1. 73 = SH = 5.37
WORK Sl-IEET FOR COMPUTING

HRS DOCUMENTATION RECORDS
1) HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
2) HNU PHOTO-IONIZER READING
3) OSTERMAN WELL
4) TRIP BLANKS
5) SEDIMENT DATA
6) GROUNDWATER DATA
7) SURFACE WATER DATA
8) BORING LOGS
9) SAMPLING LOCATION MAP
10) PERMEABILITY TEST DATA
11) BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1) HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
DOCUMENTATION RECORDS
FOR
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
INSTRUCTIONS: The purpose of these records is to provide a convenient

way to prepare an auditable record of the data and documentation used to
apply the Hazard Ranking System to a given facility. As briefly as pos-
sible summarize the information you used to assign the score for each
factor (e.g., "Waste quantity= 4,230 drums plus 800 cubic yards of
sludges"). The source of information should be provided for each entry
and should be a bibliographic-type reference that will make the document
used for a given data point easier to find. Include the location of the
document and consider appending a copy of the relevant page(s) for ease
in review.
FACILITY NAME: Nash Road Landfill
LOCATION: Nash Road, Town of Wheatfield, Niagara Co., New York
·-
1
GROUND WATER ROUTE
1. -OBSERVED RELEASE
Contaminants detected (5 maximum):
lead total halogenated organics

nickel arsenic
phenol
Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility:
groundwater sample from USGS study (1982)
* * *
2. ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS
Depth to Aquifer of Concern
Name/description of aquifer(s) in concern:

1) shallow aquifer in upper (surface)sand unit
2) low aquifer at till/bedrock interface
(Engineering Science/Dames & Moore soil borings)
Depth(s) from the ground surface to the highest seasonal level of the
saturated zone [water table(s)] of the aquifer of concern:
1) approximately 0 feet
2) approximately 8 feet
(ES/D&M soil borings and field investigations)
Depth from the ground surf ace to the lowest point of waste disposal/
storage:
27 feet in disposal trench
(New York State Department of Transportation memorandum of August 9,

1978)
(Niagara County Department of Health memorandum from M. Hopkins,

January 27, 1984)
2
Net Precipitation
Mean annual or seasonal precipitation (list months for seasonal):
40"
(Federal Register, Volume 47 no. 137, Friday, July 16, 1982)
Mean annual lake or seasonal evaporation (list months for seasonal) :
27"
(Federal Register, Volume 47 no. 137, Friday, July 16, 1982)
Net precipitation (subtract the above figures):
40" - 27" = 13"
Permeability of Unsaturated Zone
Soil type in unsaturated zone:
In western part of site·, surface soil is a fine to medium sand. In

eastern part of site, surface soil is clayey silt with trace of fine
sand.
Permeability associated with soil type:
1) western part: lo-3 cm/sec (Lambe & Whitman)
2) eastern part: 5 x lo-4. cm/sec (in-situ test)
Physical State
Physical state of substances at time of disposal (or at present time

for generated gases):
solids
liquids in drums
(Dames & Moore site visit)

(Memo of August 9, 1978)
* * *
·-
3
3 CONTAINMENT
Containment
Method(s) of waste or leachate containment evaluated:
drums and uncontained wastes
Method with highest score:
drums
4 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
Toxicity and Persistence
Compound(s) evaluated:
phenol chlorotoluenes
lead benzoyl chloride
nickel benzoic acid
arsenic (USGS study of 1982) (Hooker letter of May 9, 1968)
Compound with highest score:
lead
(3, 3) _.,. 18
Hazardous Waste Quantity
Total quantity of hazardous substances at the facility, excluding those

with a containment score of O (Give a reasonable estimate even if
quantity is above maximum):
900 cubic yards of chemical waste from Love Canal plus unknown
quantity of other industrial waste
Basis of estimating and/or computing waste quantity:
DOT memo of August 9, 1978
* * *
4
5 TARGETS
Ground Water Use
Uses(s) of aquifer(s) of concern within a 3-mile radius of the facility:
Available for industrial use
(Discussion with M. Hopkins, Niagara Co. Dept. of Health, 1983)
Distance to Nearest Well
Location of nearest well drawing from aquifer of concern or occupied

building not served by a public water supply:
Osterman residential well at 7403 Nash Road (presently unused but

useable)
Distance to above well or building:
1,000 feet west of site
(USGS Topographic map; Tonawanda East, NY quadrangle)
Population Served by Ground Water Wells Within a 3-Mile Radius
Identified water-supply well(s) drawing from aquifer(s) of concern

within a 3-mile radius and populations served by each:
None.
Computation of land area irrigated by supply well(s) drawing from

aquifer(s) of concern within a 3-mile radius, and conversion to
population (1.5 people per acre):
Not applicable.
Total population served by ground water within a 3-mile radius:
5
SURFACE WATER ROUTE
l OBSERVED RELEASE
Contaminants detected in surface water at the facility or downhill from

it (5 maximum):
TOX
methylene chloride
(Very low levels (11 ppb) may be indicative of background levels)
Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility:
Analysis of surface water samples in June, 1983 by Engineering Science/

Dames & Moore
** *
2 ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS
Facility Slope and Intervening Terrain
Average slope of facility in percent:
0%
(USGS topographic map; Tonawanda East, NY)
Name/description of nearest downslope surface water:
Sawyer Creek
(USGS topographic mapl Tonawanda East, NY)
Average slope of terrain between facility and above-cited surface water

body.in percent:
<1%
Is the facility located either totally or partially in surface water?
Yes. wastes in swamp areas and in water-filled disposal trenches.
6
Is the facility completely surrounded by areas of higher elevation?
No.
1-Year 24-Hour Rainfall in Inches
2. l"
(Federal Register vol. 47, no. 137, Friday, July 16, 1982)
Distance to Nearest Downslope Surf ace Water
0.25 miles
Physical State of Wastes
liquid and solid

(Dames & Moore site visit memo of 8/9/78)
* * *
3 CONTAINMENT
Containment
Method(s) of waste or leachate containment evaluated:
drums and uncontained

(NYSDEC memo of August 9, 1978)
Method with the highest score:
drums
7
Toxicity and Persistence
Compound(s) evaluated:
phenol chlorotoluenes
lead benzoyl chloride
iron benzoic acid
nickel (Hooker letter of May 9, 1968)
(USGS study - 1982)
Compound with the highest score:
lead
(3, 3) -+ 18
Total quantity of hazardous substances at the facility, excluding those

with a containment score of O (Give a reasonable estimate even if
quantity is above maximum):
900 cubic yards of chemical waste from Love Canal and unknown quantity
of other industrial waste
NYSDOT memo of August 9, 1978
* * *
5 TARGETS
Surface Water Use
Use(s) of surface water within 3 miles downstream of the hazardous

substance:
recreation
transportation
(numerous ES/D&M site visits)
8
Is there tidal influence?
No.
Distance to a Sensitive Environment (Ref: USGS topographic map)
Distance to 5-acre (minimum) coastal wetland, if 2 miles or less:
none within 2 miles.
Distance to 5-acre (minimum) fresh-water wetland, if 1 mile or less:
None within 1 mile.
Distance to critical habitat of an endangered species or national

wildlife refuge, if 1 mile or less:
None within 1 mile.

(Conversation with G. Batcheller, NYSDEC, Region 9)
Population Served by Surface Water
Location(s) of water-supply intake(s) within 3 miles (free-flowing

bodies) or 1 mile (static water bodies) downstream of the hazardous
substance and population served by each intake:
None.
9
Computation of land area by above-cited intake(s) and conversion to
population (1.5 people per acre):
Not applicable.
Total population served:
o.
Name/description of nearest of above water bodies:
Not applicable.
Distance to above-cited intakes, measured in stream miles:
Not applicable.
10
AIR ROUTE
1 OBSERVED RELEASE
Contaminants detected:
None detected with HNU meter during air survey of site by Dames & Moore
in July, . 1984.
Date and location of detection of contaminants
Not applicable.
Methods used to detect the contaminants:

Not applicable.
Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the site:
Not applicable.
* * *
Reactivity and Incompatibility
Most ~eactive compound:
Not applicable.
Most incompatible pair of compounds:
Not applicable.
11
Toxicity
Most toxic compound:
·Not applicable.
Total quantity of hazardous waste:
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
* * *
3 TARGETS
Population Within 4-Mile Radius
Circle radius used, give population, and indicate how determined:
0 to 4 mi 0 to 1/2 mi O to 1/4 mi
Approximately 1,800 people

(estimate from USGS topographic ~ap)
Distance to a Sensitive Environment
Distance to 5-acre (minimum) coastal wetland, if 2 miles or less:

None within 2 miles.
(USGS topographic map)
Distance to 5-acre (minimum) fresh-water wetland, if 1 mile or less:

None within 1 mile.
(USGS topographic map)
12
.
Distance to critical habitat of an endangered species, if 1 mile or
less:
None within 1 mile.

(Conversation with G. Batcheller of NYSDEC, Region 9)
(Ref: Numberous site visits by ES/D&M personnel)

Land Use '
Distance to commercial/industrial area, if 1 mile or less:
0.01 mile (adjacent to National Fuel Gas installation)
Distance to national or state park, forest, or wildlife reserve, if

2 miles or less:
Distance to residential area, if 2 miles or less:
0.01 mile (adjacent to suburban area)
Distance to agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if

1 illile or less:
0.01 mile (adjacent to corn field)
Distance to prime agricultural land in production within past 5 years,

if 2 miles or less:
Is a historic or landmark site (National Register of Historic Places

and National Natural Landmarks) within view of the site?
No.
13
2) HNU PHOTO-IONIZER READING
. ,. ' ' '
FILE \ 33c::1;)'=- 00 ~-19
: : '. • i.
~
!
I
' i ;. .
I :,
I
• : I .
i
i .
SCAL£. . HoR.e <l i>PVV\ /c"""'

... 1· I V£RT 'l..'' "' \ H 1?.
·• 0 ~ .·
w .
........
0 0 .i
! •
.' t
'
r !; ~
!
i H ~ < l ; II ' .
.,.~~ "'. _!'
< <
0 0
L
I·
l
l ' I ·
i
!'
I . : ,
. 1· "
I.
"
l
' I ~ '
l
:u !•
.. ' . c:
IJl
-l
.
:u
}>
. '. ' "'
I .
' .
~ 0 '
w
0 0
~
u >-
...
w 0..
>- :c 0
'1) u u
DAMES 8 MOOhlEl
...
-
...
...
3) OSTERMAN WELL
...
' '
.. " : .
:: :...~ . '
;. ' ;
,, ·~ '.
I •
SEP 07 1904. '. ' ..,.,
'I
CDMPUCHEM ..
lABOMTORJES "
August 30, 1984
'.
'.>·•
I~
Mr. Ernie Schroder

Engineering Science, 'Inc.
57 Executive Park South
,"" ';"'
Suite 590
Atlanta, GA 30329
; :'
Dear~Mr.
.. . Schroder: ~ •' .
.. • Thank you for se 1ect i ng CompuChem® Laboratories for your recent samp 1e ana 1-
. ysis. We have completed the analysis that you requested and have enclosed a ) .
• .· summary of the CompuChem® data for your review. Additional data details are
available for purchase if you require them. ·- ····-· ··
As you know, EPA has proposed detection limits for the priority pollutants in
.... the December 3, 1979, Federal Register, and we have reported all priority
pollutant concentrations which have exceeded these limits (or their equiva-
·. 1ent for so 1id matrices). In add it ion, we have permanently stored a comp 1ete
record of your data on magnetic tape. This includes chromatograms, mass
spectra, calibration and quality control data for the organics. Therefore,
your original data is readily available for future reference. Should you
require additional information from your data base, please contact us at
1/800-334-8525. '
In order to expedite data to you, we have forwarded the results for all
~completed analyses. If you 3ubmitted more samples than are included in the
enclosed results, the data will be forthcoming upon completion of our final
review. · . .
•
• -~ . .'· ~' ··_ 'i ' . .
r ·J.· .
.
.-·~.
\
" · 1 ..
\. :..: Your confidence in our CompuChem® service is appreciated. · We 1oak forward to

'.··',.,~a. continuing association.
··. Sin~erely,
'··1
;Customer Service Dept.

CompuChem®
..
:: ·, Enclosure:
I
"
OST-1 '32303 · .. ,. "' .. ,· ,} . ;:_·! ~-":

> .: ~ L"D1 1:
' '°; •.
. ,, . , ! .
·'
"I•.
.,'"
,; -~ ;
COMPUCHEM LABOAAroAIES. INC.• P.O. Box 12652 • 3308 Chanel Hiii/Neison HlnhwAv • Relllenrr.h Trlnnnle p,.,i. MC? .,77no .1010\ t;40.A.,A'.t · !,•; ·
!•"
'l''. ·.
: DATA REPORT NOTICE
. •/
.. CompuChem employs Methods 624 and 625 for GC/MS analysis of organics in liquid
. matrices. These methods were proposed on December 3, 1979 by the· U.S.E.P.A. in
Volume 44 of the Federal Register. These methods were subsequently revised and
reissued in July, 1982 as publication EPA-600/4-82-057. The EPA Environmental
Monitoring and Support laboratory {EMSl-Cincinnati) has subsequently issued
method modifications which provide for the analysis of· solid matrices. These
modifications specify changes in the sample preparation procedures.
Additionally, for solid samples detection limits and any analytical results
reported are based on processing the method specified sample size of as-
received material.
The referenced methods are no longer appropriate for several of the original
priority pollutant compounds. This is due to either the deletion from the
·toxic pollutant list (40 CFR Part 401) by EPA or the determination by EPA that
the referenced methods may not be optimized for certain compounds {EPA-600/4-
82-057) originally incorporated by the methods.
CompuChem® presents these· compounds in its samp 1e data report for comp 1eteness
as many of the government compound list forms continue to display the affected
..... compounds. For consistency, these compounds are reported.as 11 BDl 11 or 11 Below
Detection limit" as they are either not likely to exist in the sample or are
not likely to be detected by the method. Those compounds which have actually
been deleted are listed below with the Federal Register deletion reference.
- .J •.• ,. . . ............ .
·Compound Name GC/MS Fraction Federal·k~gister Oate
Dichlorodifluoromethane Volatile 46FR2264 1/8/81
· · . *Tri chl orofl uoromethane Volatile 46FR2264 1/8/81
. Bis(Chloromethyl)Ether Volatile 46FR10723 2/4/81
·.- ..... '
' .,,
I\:
*While this compound has been deleted, CompuChem® continues to identify

and quantitate for it.
11.
,,
. ' ...
CDMPUCHEM '. ,
LABOMTORIES . ': .
·' L"
' ~~ /'
'"· 1.
REPORT OF DATA • •.1 ~
..
•
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: OST-1
COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32303
i '·
SUBMITTED TO:
Mr. Ernie Schroder
Engineering Science, Inc.
57 Executive Park South '·
Suite 590
Atlanta, GA 30329 I•
r
. .... ·:
.....
".
':.I .1.',
.....
';,
(JJ,~lk·a.J~.···
'· t .
• ~ .• · ti .
',.\·
·. ~·
DIANA A. SCAMMELL . '

TECHNICAL SPECIALIST, OPERATIONS
.~ '
R. L. MYERS, PH.D., PRESIDENT .

ROBERT E. MEIERER
DIRECTOR OF QUALITY.ASSURANCE
.. :
.\• ~
..
"'', '., I
.:..,.'
!''
·.··
LABORATORY CHRONICLE
1:',' '.

COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32303 ...
'." .
' ''
.t
Date
•
...
t" • • . ,· .".
. \
Received/Refrigerated
Organics
7-27-84
·'
Extracted 7-30-84
' '
. :::- I
Analyzed
"!
;
1. Volatiles 7-31-84
'•·
.
•i I "
2. Acid 8-8-84
....
i -: .. ~~ i 3. Base/Neutrals 8-7-84 • -'I
?-.•;t.
i',,1 ~ ''
4. Pesticides/PCBS 8-7-84
•
...
'
·".
''
Inorganics
1. Metals
2. · Cyanide
,,: ..
8-14-84
8-9-84
. . ' t' 1.
3. Phenols · Not Requested "
i. I>
''·
,.'.'-.
"·
-··:
' .. ,
·:' "
' : .. . :{•" .
' . ,, ' .
~ '.' .
•'
.. :
·-·· ;1·. .•·•
/ • ..
•, '. 1
COMPOUND LIST VOLATILES ORGANICS .

' '.1 ·

;,,
' ' . .
. -~
. COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32303
. ' ;' . .... ,~ . ..
.,
DETECTIONt
CONCENTRATION .· LIMIT ;, .•· .
. . (UG/L) (UG/L)
. i 1V•. , . CHLOROMETHANE BDL 10

2V ._''.' VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 10
:. 3V. CHLOROETHANE BDL 10
• · 4V.: BROMOMETHANE BDL 10
5V. ;:- ACROLE IN BDL 100
6V. · ACRYLONITRILE BDL .. 100
·JV. METHYLENE CHLORIDE 14(BG}* 10
BV •. ·TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10 .,
.. · 9V•• , 1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10
lOV •. 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 10 •''
,. llV. ' TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10 : t.
, . ;
. ' 12V. ' CHLOROFORM BDL 10

: 13V. 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE ' I BDL 10
'. . 14V: 1, 1.1-TR ICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
. -::•· '
.• 15V.· CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 10

16V. , BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 10 ',, ... '
17V.} 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 10

18V. i, · TRANS-1, 3-D I CHLOROPROPENE . BDL 10
i 19V ~.~t TRICHLOROETHYLENE .1" . BDL 10
• BDL 10 .. " .
• . i' 20V.; BENZENE :~
... '·. 21 V. CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 10 •.: . . , I !
• . , 22V •. : l, 1,2-TR ICHLOROETHANE · · . BDL 10 ·rt.,. ;:. .

· • 23V •. i OIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE . BDL 10
>.· 24V. ',. BROMOFORM BDL 10· ·, r i .,'' .. ,; ;· •
J
. . 25V. · 1, 1,2, 2-TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10 t
'
..
'
'·.: \ " \ :
r
.
l
'
;
~
,· 26V.-< 1.1,2 ,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE · BDL 10 '.

.> . },'- ' .
''
. BDL.
, · 27V •. ; TOLUENE
'.'.. 28V .·,, CHLOROBENZENE
.
BDL
10
10 . , ...
.:
:·'.''
'!'
J ;l •
· . ; . 29V ... ETHYLBENZENE BDL 10 I '•·
. 30V. 1 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 10 :_ <· ~ .

.31v.~·01cHLORODIFLUOROMETHANEt BDL
.:. 32V. :;: BIS(CHLOROMETHYL)ETHERt BDL
:: I • 'I ._.~ ·. . . . •
··'" ·
. , ... :
' : ' ' ~.i :' .. . . i.
'. :
"
:·'
1 BOL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT ·. ' .. ,,
I'
t._, .~~!. ' ( .~;. :,
tsee:Oata.Report Notice '. ·1

I:; ; •
•
' j• 1"·· '; . ,,. , ·"

·: : *See .Qua 1ity Contro 1 Not 1ce
~~ .;.i
.
,1 '
. ' '~.: \ ~ .
. .~~.
... ' • : ''.11
. If-,
... '
. ~ '
' :-·
•, .
f.
_. r
,. •
.
'
·,1
.. . .
.,
I •'•,
.. I
.• '.l
! • ' QUALITY ASSURANCE NOTICE -
; .
CompuChem Sample No.'"'· 32303 1 • . "'' ·~ '
. . .... ; ,: •,,
.' ( . ' ·.'.: -~·
· Although not required by the Federa 1 Reg1 ster, December 3, 1979 (mod1fi ed July, •-, · · ·
1982) Volatile Method 624 procedure, the laboratory prepares VOA blanks when. . .,.•.. _. ·.
compositing water samples and preparing low and medium level hazardous waste:·,-.::·;··~
VOA samp 1es. This is to insure that the glassware used is free from con- "· "' ·1.~ .~ •
tamination. and to monitor the possibility of cross-contamination from high '; 1 ' · z
• ·. levels· of volatile organic compounds in some samples and the laboratory .. _:·i....• ;~_". ••· · ·
. ; atmosphere.. · . ' i~
l. " ~· '·, . ~:~ .
··,The.compositing or method blank (#'32333 · ) prepared with this sample contained· : • ·;:.;
~:··the i;:om~ound(s) listed below. The concentration in the associated sample.has./.. "'· 1 ·
; be~n ..adJusted and the data flagged with a qualifier. . ._ . . .. · · , _. "
' ··;. ~: "'!~· ::. i: ;: ;,j· ' , -: .'
:. i : ' .j.jJ?
' ' ·. . ~ f, ..
': .
:: ,~: ~"' . ' '
Adjusted Sample
Concentration Applicable
· .... toinpound ( s) · '( ug/1) Qualifier
... Methylene Chloride 14 BG
'( :. L~ , qi . ~: I . '
r' .
. ·,
. !:
·;· .. ·The following data qualifiers are used by EPA and adopted by CompuChem® for ·
- <· .. reporting purposes: ··
.. :,' ·:·~:! ~ :·' '~\·:· : ~; ,. ,·
.; .· .\
'"
' .
" ... i•
"
I~:, _;":·· .
=·The concentration in the blank is greater than 1/2 of the method detection.· '·,:r : 1
",~limit and is less than or equal to lf2 the concentration detected in a · . ; :}
'I •
..,
~
. '
·· samp 1e; the con cent ration in the b1ank is subtracted from the samp 1e ~ · ..;• · '.··: · · +.• ~· . .
J. '' ~. • ,•
(
··'I
.
.'
"
,;
: . '' /
. I \f,
. !-,~-~ . :
• -·,' ' .... 1

..
. .. -:
:-
~
. :· .
. ;·.'
COMPOUND LI ST ACID EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS
:·~; ''/ :. . .. ... :~ ... '-: :.

,
.: . ···: .
. ':•-l •
•.1;(:, ';; .
•·.' I
,.·l, I
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: OST-1 ',I .''
"(OMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32303 ..: ' :.

,,. j.
'
DETECTION t~ "
CONCENTRATION LIMIT ...,I
.... (UG/Lr" (UG/L) .
... '
• lA •.. PHENOL BDL 25 .
. 2A. · 2-CHLOROPHENOL BDL . 25
3A. : 2-NITROPHENOL BDL 25 .'i
4A. '.i 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BDL 25
: 5A., 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL BDL 25
~I 6A.~ P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL BDL 25
7A.'.• 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL BDL 25
SA. ~; 2,4-DINITROPHENOL BDL 250
. C· 9A. ·~·, 4-NITROPHENOL BDL 25
.. lOA. :: 4,6-DINITR0-0-CRESOL BDL 250
1 llA.: PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1
BDL 25
••. ~· < •
. ·J~:1 .; .
~'',j··~.\;·· . "'.
·r .
' ~( ·:, '~ ~.. ~ 'i -: ;' -
.) .''l ' 'I ~·
• .. _.;jr(:·: ·. • . ~I .. "). •,
• . . ' .·• ·,. '1 '

•• O' - ~i. ;
··.:: • ..
. :·~: ,;, -, '

.,·· ' \ r' ··, ,
.
. ' ~
' ;: ~ ·:
'I,\
.. ,
...
, ~ .~ ';;v .. ~· :
'~ .! :-· . ·i-:\-t ;
. • '.;:,~ '·! : :_i·.. -·
• -t ..
'_, ;, . - ~-
1,, ~; •
.:· ";
j,
~- '
• '" t_ ·\
' :;.:
' . 1~ f ...
\' . '_': BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
.:-~~r.t · ·
'.•'
; " ,.
- -~
,
.: ·i
-,,. i
~-
·;
\ .,-
·'
...
,.,,., , • ,_. r.
"1:
. . 1:·~ I. ( ' jj:~ ! "·..
• t· '
"d"
'
; 'CI
•I,
r
. '
. ,. 1'
': .. ·f;·. ,,
,, '.
'. 1:.·
• t'.i.
" . ·: ~- . ·. . :;.
' '
,.·'.··.:
. i'
... .. ~
.....-~· '
~
.' .. -~ ~ '
' ' '
::·
COMPOUND LIST BASE-NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS \ '-:
~; .. . )

' : •; ' !
·.. ·.;
.. ~ . ·'.' '
DETECTION
CONCENTRATION LIMIT
i ". .•
(UG/L) {UG/L) .· . . : , -~- \~· ~ ' ~ ~~
''
lB.; N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE BDL 10 . ;

.
: :.:;;; ' ·-·
' '.','
2B.·,~:
7
•. BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
• :. BDL . 10 ~ ..
\ . ~\ . . :;
. 3B~ 1,3.~DICHLOROBENZENE . BDL 10

. . 4B. : 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE : BOL 10
SB. ,ll,2-DICHLOROBENZENE '
I BDL '10
; < 66. : BIS (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER BDL 10
: .: .7B ~ .". HEXACHLOROETHANE 8DL 10
·.BB. : N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE BDL 10
., 9B. · NITROBENZENE BDL 10
. lOB.\ ISOPHORONE 8DL 10
. 116.~ BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BOL 10
.128.' 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10
13B. NAPHTHALENE 8DL · 10
.14B.: 'HEXACHLOROBUTAOIENE BDL 10 ' "
158.· HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE BDL .. 10

' 168. :i:: 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE. t":. BDL 10
r
8DL 10 .:. .
. A., 17B. "· DIMETHYLPHTHALATE. fL
W 18B • .': ACENAPHTHYLENE BDL 10 ,;
,y~ 19B.i 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE • ' . 80L 10 I,•
.~ 206 ~\:'.. ACENAPHTHENE BDL .. 10

, · 21B;./ 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
.
·~. 22B.~_DIETHYLPHTHALATE
. ~
.BDL
BDL
: 10
10 .' .
,; · 23B ~f FLUORENE . BOL 10 .<·:,~ '·L·:. i :•'

. 246 ;"';; 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER . BDL .· 10
. 258. ;; DIPHENYLAMINE (N-NITROSO} BDL 10 !~
BDL
' '
268.~ 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZOBENZENE) 10

. 27B •. !4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BOL 10
28B.~ HEXACHLOR08ENZENE BDL 10
..· (Cont 1nued) .

1
·I-·
.
1
BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
j ,·'. -~ ' '-!. :~,
· . ·;( ;' !:~.· · :

.. ,. '
COMPOUND LI ST BASE-NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS (Page Two)

•, '· .
! .

: :. ,' .: ;
. ·." .r -.
,1)'.
l.
DETECTION
" ,. CONCENTRATION LIMIT
(UG/L) (UG/L)
• 29B.~: PHENANTHRENE
30B •. ANTHRACENE
31B ... Dl-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
· 32B •. FLUORANTHENE
33B •.~· BENZIDINE
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BOL
10
10
10
10
10
l
34B. ~. PYRE NE BOL 10

. · 35B. '\ BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE 33 10
. 36B.~ BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BOL 10 •'.
• · 37B.' 3,3 1 -DICHLOROBENZIOINE BOL lq .. :
38B. ·· CHRYSENE BOL 10
.· 39B •. · BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE BOL 10
408, ·. DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BDL , 10
'41B. BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE BOL 10
42B. · BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE BDL 10
43B. •·. BENZO(A)PYRENE BOL 10
• 44B. INDENO(l,2,3-C,D)PYRENE.
45B •. DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
46B •. ~ BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE .
'·
1
','. ..
' : .
BOL
BOL
BOL
25
25
25
. . . .
j.
;"
~ '~
·•
·"
)
.:
., '
..
:
.
;: '!
: ' .
., ,f- ... -:·
i , ·.;
td'
,·.
.J':.: ·'.:
(
'~ ;' ·~ .
' 1' ~ '
, . i' •:.'.•.,I' ..:. ', :. 1

'
..
. ~ ~: ·.~\-
' .. ')
i
" . ;
'
,
";:~·' BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT ~ , : ~~I , I
' •":•
• t ' ~
i. {; .. I
'
'
..:·.,
I
I ! . r::• •
"
. ,. "
~ .' ' "
. ' ,•"
. '
,; ' •, I!.
COMPOUND LIST PESTICIDES/PCB'S

. ·t .
. j .
.· ,.

; .·.
COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32303 ', '" : ;.·
i, :.
·.t ,'
.. '
'
•/
DETECTION
....·.:, CONCENTRATION LIMIT
' ','1 --
{UG/L} (UG/L}
. ·.··., ',· ·, ...
BOL 10
.
.... lP •. ALDRIN . ) ;.
• 2P. : ALPHA-BHC BDL 10 f •
·,.
3P. i': BETA-BHC .BDL 10

4P •. : GAMMA-BHC BDL 10
SP •.: DEL TA-BHC. · BDL 10 ,','
. ·..'i·: \ .,
6P •.·~ CHLORDANE BDL 10
,· ;
7P. / 4,4'-DOT BDL 10
.. BP.: 4,4'-DOE BOL 10
9P.:: 4,4'-DDD BDL 10
lOP •. DIELDRIN BDL 10
1lP •. ALPHA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 10
12P.'. BETA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 10
13P. · ENDOSULFAN SULFATE . BDL 10
14P. ENDRIN BDL 10
15P. ENDRIN ALDEHYDE BDL 10
16P. HEPTACHLOR BDL 10
. 17P., HEPTACHLJR EPOXIOE BDL 10
r "
BDL 10
.·. .-. .
:,
18P • .t PCB-1242 : '.•
• : l9P. :· PCB-1254 . BDL . 10 '
10 " .r;
20P.~ PCB-1221 . BOL .
·~·
I-. !.'
. 21P. ;. PCB-1232 BDL 10 :

'
~!~~~·
\. (
·. :, · 22P. ·· PCB-1248 BDL 10

i. i . 23P." PCB-1260
. BDL 10
· :· 24P •.: PCB-1016 BDL 10
10
25P. ·i TOXAPHENE
. , BOL
.I ···1
. I
.. • .
.,:,·. :
.
.
:•'
i
. ~'
" " .~ ' '•:

"·;'!,. \ • "' I
..'
.~ \
·~~ BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
"I
' J: ' ·. ·,
',·
. .' .. "·
''·
:_ ... ;1
' ' I
'JI
·,
\ .. .~'
•' j.
'"
COMPOUND LIST INORGANICS PRIORITY POLLUTANTS

. '. ' fl· . •: .".~' '
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: osT.:.1 .i.
·. '
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT ..

(MG/L) (MG/L)
: ...
'·.".. ·'
,.
\. . .. i1
1. CADMIUM, TOTAL BDL 0.010
•
.2. CHROMIUM, TOTAL BOL 0.050
COPPER, TOTAL
:-~ . • 10fP•
3. ~DL
· 4. LEAD, TOTAL * ~
5. MERCURY, TOTAL'. o.ooos· .~
0.020 . . ;, ..
·. 6. ZINC , TOT AL 0.05 l
1
7. NICKEL, TOTAL BDL / 0.10 '
8. CYANIDE BDL 0.01
' :
·.:
I /
. ) I Q')
DI' :j
•,
;.\
. ' i
.:· BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT. ..
~: ~
.~
;.·; .·,
· \*Lead analyzed by flame

j • ·' , •• : •
AAS because of concentration level found.
: .. : : ·. 1,.; .,
·: 1· !,,:, ,(;
.. '·. ~~.·; ~ ; ;~.·:'. ·~.'

"
.. ,
; .. I '
·';
...
{~rl-i
!_~-•
..·-™,.,
tPfl(
-·-••11
Kllllllll!HUI -~~KI Rflt
l'U'll'm1'
Fr' le
ColABo.MPUCHEM fiprt P
RAIDRIES
I ', ~ !" ' i ";. ' . '
;_· '·{'.' '.;' "'
', ,(
-'.;, Nov 191904

., '~ : .,•· ' .
,.. ' '
November 8, 1984
Mr. Rocco Palazzolo
57 Executive;Park South
Suite 590::· ''"'
Atlanta~ GA~ .--30329 · ..
RE: Data Inquiry for sample OST-1/32303
Dear Mr. Palazzolo:
Enclosed is an amended compound list for sample number 32303 that reflects
the correct detection limit for lead.
We apologize for any inconvenience you may have experienced. If you have
further questions please feel free to call me at 1/800-334-8525.
Sincerely,
· (C01M~(J.o/c~
Diana A. Scammell
Technical Specialist, Operations
cc: Robert Meierer
Mickey Cartagena
File /132303
COMPUCHEM LABORAlORIES, INC.· P.O. Box 12652 • 3308 Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway· Research Triangle Park, NC 2n09 • (919) 549-8263
. ·~
._, .
..
COMPOUND LIST INORGANICS PRIORITY POLLUTANTS

COMPUC~EM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32303
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT

(MG/L) (MG/L)
1. CADMIUM, TOTAL . BDL 0.010

2~ CHROMIUM, TOTAL BDL 0.050
3. COPPER, TOTAL BDL 0.10
4~ LEAD, TOTAL* 0.14 0.050
5. MERCURY, TOTAL 0.0008 0.00020
6. ZINC, TOTAL 0.05 0.020
7. NICKEL, TOTAL BDL 0.10
8. CYANIDE BDL 0.010

*Lead analyzed by flame AAS because of concentration level found.
..
I •. Olvls/on of Recra Research, Inc. . 5 I>/ ti • ~""-
I c/ 6,/( Cu~ . 1/:

r .;f!.· .t;5 /e,< n~.. wJ-11~ ~
( c• t "'- 7 (Q .J.
·. I5.1-
•I
F-. -*
.
·;~I .· ~
,A . .,
(t/
/~ r{,) lt.
r. . •'. I.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
\,
.
,.,, . .
' ~ I ' ~ ' J
H2M
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES
.I
l
I
-t'·'
'. I ' ~
Prepared For:
H2M
.. 575 Broadhallow Road
·.~.
'
. r Melville, NY 11747
'
.
.. ~ j'
t··.
J '
',''. ''
.. .
,, '
~ ~'
l,
: I Prepa:r;ed By: .~ l'.
l
"1'
' i
.:'1 • Recra Environmental Laboratories
4248 Ridge Lea Road
Amherst, NY 14226
. : • I; I I
!
,,
Report Date: October 3, 1984
' .!
' . ,,.
!
1 '1" ' ''
t: .,
1
, !' ~.
. ·,
•-.-4-248-A-ldg-e_La_a_A_o_ad_,_A_m-he-rs_t_, N_e_w_Y_ork-14-226--~--------;--.-,- -T-el_ep_h_o-ne-; ~ bo; es;-ra-:to-ry" "j~T~ i6~!)E:S-l]2~.~$260i20)

'' •f
.
,. ! . "'; ' ... ;,
•;. i.
::,::;;:.:f~:it;:, ;;:f;'
.h '• • • ;\·
:·-.l,
·l i',• ;· '. ·.:-
\.' ·,
I~ l'
., t•
.. ,}·l,1'.1
"l' .. :. r ··'.: _, ,-~ ·t;'' ( ! ·~r· ,•J
;; ~,
POL~ii~ANT ~j!:~i~:i' .' ',

'
ANALYTICAL RESULTS ·~." .,
.·:r.'
.; PRIORITY. ANALYSES ' ' ;, '
~ ~. , ~ {.
·!· •. ~! •. < :- .,..
t· ''•i
1
"·~..·.· ~-. :,:•.. ,) ·.-, ·::/,/·.:.~: ·4,.,·1-;::·.:,-i>t~~- •...:' 11· •.:1

· , , ,. )·
· ;, Report Date: 10/3/84 ::.~·'; i'.;·l{: • ·
· . r1·.
ti ..
~.. .-.~. - .
'
". -.; ,.:.
'
l,
'
~-if •:1 ·
J
' ,.1 , "
/,
' .'\
•• ·:
,.· :· !'•', ··.~~ ~ ~-; ,1 ~

I'
5, 1984 samp~es were received at Recra Environ,111ental

,·1 '·
A request was made by H2M to have the samples .analyzed for:

' . ~ - t' ...;.' ,.. --.~:I
•. ." ' '
I.··'
of the Environmental Protection Agency decreed priority· .. ;'. · · :. ',\, .
.
' ' ',·' . ~! .
• ....
.''r
.;
'1'.
!. 'l
'1··
~ :·l .- '. I •
..
.' ~
··~ .
I,,• (.
'I
., .
. ·'
'. •' "' ,·
Respectfully·submitted,
.\ 'i
,•\'
"', ...
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES .1·
i·
•:'!
.; .1 , .•
'·
'.:. :'• ·< i.' ••• ; 'i''
0 ;·
. l
"" 1.- ANALYTICAL RESULTS.·.

' ·•.,.ill :1. ' f: ;
. ; ;
I ,,··
"
H2M
GAS, CHROMATOGRAPHY /MASS SPECTROMETRY · .
._, PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES ·. : l
,, ,
' •. '.,·I; ·'' q.1' I
.~:;.~~·qr\· 1 :~ .. ~: "l;i' ..
' J j 1' ~·:' -' t .; f : :. I;~~ ft' '
. ''•. . 1:;,,j'l-lr.~~~r··.~••. &,l1
' <>'t ,b ' 1 ,..: .. • ~ !,., . \

·'··.;·:J,lf:"~· .. :!111·'
. ' ~· ' 'Report Date: 10/3/84 '· • ·11 ~· >,, •• i• I
. ·. ·: -:"·1.-!" i ;':._·~'. ~:.-; ·;. :·r ::.
~·.
,fl"-
.,
' . "·' ~-
~
ACID/PHENOLICS ' • :, ,: .i 1,f\' ·;~iii,

-.-,-.f,-':_:-_:_;___________;___...:.;;.;;..;;;I-,::._-'--;;;_-;.;,;-;;;;;-..;..;-;..;;;-;;.;:_:...:._..;;;._-_-.-~=AMP===L-
.... =E-.-I:n:E:N:T=I~:-F
..... ... A-~T:r:o:N============ :.:.:";!. ~r
-I:c.....
.. '·", .. .. DETECTION ,. ,,:~<.:.·:.;.ii,;·~.-..·~.±, .~L~1,::
, LIMrr • , · . L~4f ~·
~ (110/l '\ · OSTF.RMAN PROPERTY·:·:'.~ '.J·;'ii?~;
2-chlorophenol 1.1 ND .;
,f.
•' :
2,4-dichlorophenol 2.·1 ND
·•
2,4-dimethvlphenol 2.7 ND
4,6-dinitro-o~cresol 24 ND . ~" i .
2,4-dinitrophenol ND ·: ': ':.··.

...
42
2-nitrophenol 3.6 ND '' · ' ;"
4-nitrophenol 2.4 ND
ND
J.m
.
'
ND
" "
ND
.. t .,·•
•;;\•'i_
·i ADDITIONAL . SAMPLE INFORMATION
Sample Date 7 /11/84 7 /11/84
Extraction Date 9/7/84 9/7 /84
Analvsis Date 9/19/84 9/19/84
Internal Standard (IS) - Level 20 lH!:Jl 20 pg/l
deuterated phenanthrene - Recovery lOOi. um:
Surrogate Standard (SSl) :- Level 120 wdl 120 JJg/1
2-fluorophenol - Recoverv '. 55% 30%
Surrogate Standard {SS2). - Level 120 pg/l 120 u2/l
Pentafluoroohenol - Recovery 43;~. 27%
;
... ·.·
. ''I ~'; '
~
;·-,h:
,;f
i..,, ,.
I\
;
' • I ·" •• -.
•. 1;: ·,r- !
..
' .
.!-' •
·.'
t: I t
~ .·. ;
'
·! ; 1,
'
'l :·1l; \
\ ... ! ' I ' "
~
'
I, I I. '"· •'i· .. . : F
• , 1 •• ~·"V ,.c:', OR RECRA
. f. i\ ::.·1;{~J:·;1 ;:
' .; i(:·# :' " ;;, .
,:,;:,;·,r; i' .
f't
....
·y.~,~:
It I,'' i ~/·
-~1
;;·l
!I f~~f ;
,,:: ; .j,
;~~:·
,', I ;
·'
1
. '
-riA EHVIROHMENTAl LABORATORIES
ti l'age l ot · :l. · · :
;:.';.-·:: .
.{' .
I
I .. ,
I '\
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
. I'
...
·' ..·
. '
't. .. ,J
I ' H2M
';~ ".;, L
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY

, __ PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES ; ·'
Report Date: 10/3/84

I~ BASE/NEUTRALS
I DETE;,CTION •.
l- .
LIMIT
COMPOUND '1if' /1 ) GILI CREF.K OSTERMAlJ PROPI<''QTV
....
j' 1cenaphthene · I 1.CJ ND NO
1
i'acenaohthvlene I . "\ 'i NO NO
I .
I "'3.nthracene i 1 Q · tm 1m
11 "'benzidine /,./, Nn lJn
.1.benzo(a)anthracene 7.A Mn Nn
II ....
J :>enzo(a)ovrene ? "
NO un
I benzo (b) fluoranthene i

i
/, A Nn Nn
J .}enzo (2. h. i)oervlene i 4.1 ND ND
'I benzo(k)fluoranthene I
2.5 ND ND
' '•
I ·>is (2-chloroethoxv)methane
1
I
I
:
f
5.3 ND rm
rli1sC2-chloroeth~l)ether I 5. 7 . ND ND
I Jis(2-chloroisooronvl)ether
I
I 5.7 ND ND
1 1'1>is (2-ethvlhexvl)ohthala te I 2.5 ND ND
I 4-bromoohenvlohenvlether l.CJ ND Nn
I butvlbenzvlohthalate ~
2.5 1 ND Nn
I 2-chloronaohthalene '
! 1. q ND
..
Nn
"
r
1/
4-chloroohenvlohenvlether i 4.2 ' ND NO
.,,
chrvsene 2.5 ND tm
: '
dibenzo(a.h)anthracene 2.5 ND Nn
11.2-dichlorobenzene 1. q rm »n : t, '·
l "..
1.3-dichlorobenzene 1.9 ND Nn
i" 1. 4-dichlorobenzene /,, . I. Nn Nn
II ' ,.,
I 3. 3 1 -dichlorobenzidine 1 n. s ' NO Nn
.~iethvlphthalate 2? Nn Mn
..
: dimethvlohthalate 1.6 NO Nn
..
di-n-butvlohthalate I 2. 'i NO Nrl
:I ~''
:er.a:; .· .. .
(Continued) .. ; .,.
' '
' '
I . ..·: :i . ' ,, "

' CAA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
. I.D. /184-898 l ..
Page 'J. of l.
'\
" ANALYTICAL RESULTS
H2M ';
! ; 'i'·
Report Date: 10/J/84

BASE/NEUTRALS
. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
. . DETECTION . ~.. .
' LlMIT
COMPOUND . (110Ji) GILL CREEK OSTERMAN PROPERTY
2,6-dinitrotoluene 1. 9 ND ND
2,4-dinitrotoluene 5.7 ND ND
di-n-octvlphthalate 2.5 ND ND
1,2-dinhenvlhydrazine '
25 ND ND
fluoranthene 2.2 ND ND
fluorene 1. 9 ND ND
hexachlorobenzene LQ ND ND
hexachlorobutadiene 0;9 ND ND
hexachlorocvclopentadiene 25. ND ND
hexachloroethane ND
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene .. . 1.6
3.7
ND
ND ND
isophorone 2.2 ND ND
naphthalene 1.6 ND ND
nitrobenzene 1. 9 ND ND
N-nitrosodimethylamine 25 ND' ND
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine 25 ND ND
N-nitrosodiphenvlamine 1. 9 ND ND
phenanthrene 5.4 ND ND
ovrene 1. q ND ND
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 1. 9 ND ND ')
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATION

. Extraction Date
Anal sis Date
Internal Standard - Level
deuterated henanthrene - Recover
Surrogate Standard (SS3) - Level
decaf luorobi hen 1 - Recover
2-fluorobi hen 1 - Recover
'
l;OR RECRA ENVraoimENTAL LABORATORIES. ·Jr,~ j ~(;,,,.
: .: ' ··~ .
.· .
},
. ~-
' DATE t!/:ftf .:
" I:·..
'f
·:
I.'
ANALXTICAL RESULTS '·i·
. ·• H2M ::I i" . :

., PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES .. ·1.t.•• "
I·-,
'i-1.:
.....~· '
! ' · R~port Date: 10/3/84 ·.
f :
VOLATILES
I .. • ~. ~ 'J I . SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
~
j-HJ '(iHl.(;· : '? " I

.
.. ,..
.. •.
DETECTION :
... ·" ..' '
- ... , ....i ·I
LUII':t •.·I
i."· .. '
COMPOUND (u,!:11) ' GILL CREEK
o;',I
OSTERMAN PROPERTY '.

., •'I , '
•\
... ,,
:
r - .• •: i~,, . ~-: ~ .
J acrolein . (· I
400 ND ND •t, ,i.1'
I..• acrvlonitrile 400 ND ND

"· : !' . "
. , . ~ . ·~~/·:
I benzene ·. 4.4
,.
ND ' ND
~ . ~; ... ' ~:
!"" bromodi.chloromethane 2.2 ND ND
• "<";,' ·t'
.)
I .•.
"bromoform I 4.7 ND ND
" ',".'~;·,
':.>>
...
j r- brom~methane '
10 ND ND ' I
I~ carbon tetrachloride 2.8 ND ND

chlorobenzene 6.0 ND ND
J ,
chloroethane 10 ND ND
.... . ..
I·r 2-chloroethylvinyl ether
chloroform···
10
1. 6
ND
ND "
ND
ND
,~..~
'·
;' ~
,.
~' ;
,
'
t.,
-·
chloromethane 10 ND ND
I dibromochloromethane 1. 1 ND ND
.. . I
L 1,1-dichloroethane ND ND
1-:.. j ~ ~
~
"' 7
j,.. 1, 2-dichloroethane "
2.8 ND ND ' . ·:f'
.
.;;,-. ~ . ii
I" 1,1-dichloroethvlene 2.8 I· '\•
. ,. .·:y
ND ND '1
' .. l .• :·. '. ; ~t

trans-1,2-dichloroethvlene 1.6
J.,.- ND
..
ND
...
..... J
I 1,2-dichlor~oropane ' 6.0 ND

..
HD
.; t .
. i ...
·:··~
If'" ethvlbenzene
'l,3-dichloropropene
.
'i.0
7.2
ND
ND
;
ND
ND
, ·,, ~-; .,,
I
-. ·i'.~ \ J:· ":
methylene chloride 2.8 ND ND
·..,~~
''.;
i~·l,1,2;2-t~trachloroethane ' ;
i1
6.9 rm
I tetrachloroethvlene '• I
ND '
I
. '
·:'! J. -:\-\··
;.·.l ;.:.~
it·:;·;
'"·' 4.1 ND ND '
(' :',
''· ; ~ :>/
~
I
"
.; •",
' '
(Continued) ;:' ../;,;:·
' "
. "··""·.
·''
;.
~' '
,, t
'·
' ~
... ~~
: I
'. ...
','; •'
.
·~ ;
"
.i'
. ...
~.
'' .. .l I ~' t
'
':.:· . 'l
"
..
:~·
:,
. ~'
7,, . •. ;,;
' ..." ;"'"·
' '
,....'" :.··',.: ' I
"~-1..:~~ • ANALYTICAL RESULTS

! ·_1,· • t";. l
.' H2M
L,
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS .SPECTROMETRY, "··

·· l· ' , PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES. . . ·~ .i,
.,
>·
:,, -
· · ,. . Report Date:
• l
VOLATILES
DETEC.TION 'I· ,ti.
LIMIT
COMPOUND CREEK
toluene D D
1 1 !-trichloroethane D ."
1 1 2-trichloroethane
trichloroeth lene 'i .::
,,, vin chloride

L. ,, : .. ~;
:
', .
·Sample Date 7 /11/84 7 /11/84

II
.~Analysis Date
9/17 /84
40 µ~/l
9/17/84
40 iudl
..,. bromochloromethane - Recovery 73% 80%
I Internal Standard - Level
T2-bromo-l-chlorooropane - Recovery
40 usdl
1
70%
40 IJ!)/1
73%
l Internal Standard - Level 40 ue/l 40 UQ' /1
I..... l, 4-dichlorobutane - Recovery
,_I·
76% 767.
' .• 1j ,'i
,.· "
·\·.
•·. . . •r.
' -· .- .i\:1> f: -~;'..
"~
·,···
·!. 1.,,
:: .. ,1 ,•;
,., . . ;:· .
' .•. (
il~A ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

T. 0." i/84-898
. ..
H2H
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
.....
'' I
[.'

.' .
PESTICI ''PCB Is
• SAMPJ.F. T.DENTIFH~ATION (DATE) .
-. ..
..
UNITS' OF
• . GILL CREEK OSTERMAN PROPERTY
COMPOUND MRAC::llRR (7 /J1 /R4) (7/]1 /P.t.\.
aldrin 110 /1 0. 10 <0.01
a-BHC ucdl 0.16 <0 01
B-BHC mdl 0 26. <0 01
6-BHC 110'/1 0 O'i <0 01
y-BHC . 110 /1 0 Ola <0.01
:· '
chlordane 110 /1 <0.2 <Q.1

4,4'-DDD 110' /1 <0 n? <0 01
4,4'-DDE Ul!'/1 <0 O? <0 01
4,4'-DDT "" /] <0 07 <0 01
dieldrin llO' /1 <0.02 <0 01
a-endosulfan 110 /1 <0'0? <0 01
B-endosulf an IJO' /1 <0 O? <0 01
I endosulfan sulfate 11fl/l <0.02 <0.01

endrin 11e./l <0.02 <0.01
endrin aldehyde ug/l <0.02 <0.01
heptachlor µg/l <0.02 <0.01
heptachlor epoxide µe./1 <0.02 <0.01
PCB-1016 JJe./l <0~2 <0.1
PCB-1221 JJg/l <0.4 <0.2
PCB-1232 µg/l <0.4 <0.2
PCB-1242 11g/l <0.2 I <0.1
[.
PCB-1248 IJg/l <0.2 <0.1

PCB-:-1254. JJgfl <0.2 <0.1
PCB-1260 JJg/l <0.2 <0.1
toxaphene JJg/l <0.2 <0.1
r
j
FOR "RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LAB?RATORIES _1....;':-~~~"""l"'F----------
~.·.·
ltECRA
..
ENVl~pNMENTAL LABORATORIES
' DATE 10 /3/~V
"··-· :_ T.• p:u~P.ftg§~§'JtJ. . I

.:
'!·/·ft
/ ~ . . ... .'""'·': {
.: ;
·· /· . .. .
. J ... (' t) .,
.. ANALYTICAL RESULTS
\
' \
H2H .,-.
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES .. ',.
• .
.'
Report Date: 10/3/84,:·. ;'
J ' ,' I 'i • f,
i' \ · t ..
UNITS OF
COMPO.UNO MF.AS URE
Total antimon
Total arsenic
,.,
Total ber llium < <
Total cadmium 006
Total chromium
..·'
Total co er .:
... ~
Total lead
'·
Total mer cur <
Total nickel < <
Total selenium < < "
J·i'l'
" ' : I
Total silver < <
":.,
• 1 Total thallium < < ..'
l
... !,"
.,...
·t
:~
~- .'
..
,;;· .,I .,!
r .,. . ~:i
.
:. '
! I
I
: l
: I
. :
I .. ~ ,
.:t: ~t :
. 'r) :r
' ' -~
,i ',
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES@_,._·...,.__._,__.(""'-/_.___,..-;?'---_·-=-'".:....:Y.""'_·_,,.__.:;_......,..__··_
...' DATE /0/ ~/,) i
~~--'"---+1~__,.,_....._ __ ~~~ . I;
"'
•. I
... .
'• ~ '
'
f •••
I ·:;; ·:.
...
. !, '
~ . \!
l } . .( • i.
\ ~ '' ; . ·: '
i .·: ;
I
I,
ANALYTICAL RESULTS ·"
·h.:r:·1
'I•
. . ~'
H2M
i: i •
Report Date: 10/3/84. I.

.,.
MISCELLANEOUS t!' • l,
'·t~~· ... "!•II-

SAMPLE IDENTIFICAT!ON (DATE)
ii r'·~"t;/·:: . (. .
t,
lt
J\:.: .:~:,, (l.;.c
;. ';, ·1 '\..
.'
' .~ . ~.'I
COMPOUND
UNITS OF
MEASURE . !. GILL CREEK
(7 /11/84)
OSTERMAN PROPERTY.
(7 /11/84)
f·l)'.' ;· I•
Total cyanide mg/l <0.010 <0.01 '

Total recoverable .. ·;11i·
.. ;:·
"· ohenolics '"I'.,;.
mg/l <0.01 <0.01
.:< \'
... ,:'
'r'
· 1: ,..
·~: f.
J •.
'::·.
,,
, ,H/,:'
.., ."
·~' • >'
J ~'
~: ~
.' :!
:•,.
"
~
1
·,'1' ' .. ; I .
. ,
·' .1
...
.
.., :
..1,:;'.
C1 L ""'~ . .
; ;.,
/
~ ..
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL .LABORATORIES (3l
DATE lc:/1 /Fcl
I > ,
"·
',
'''-i·
'•,t.
I
, i
~.
. :·.
;
;
~. '.q
t::'l:.'1A ENVIRONMENTAl lABORATORIES
Tr, n:'lf nnn
' •
; . ANALYTICAL RESULTS
·". '\
\
I
•, '·0.·'
"
"·
lllM
. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
.QUALITY CONTROL
,, i
'l
ff. - II
'
,,
.'. Report Date: 10/3/84
'" .;
~
..
. --··.
"
I' .
EXTRACT~BLE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OF I
r-.·~' SAMPLE GILL CREEK

·- COm>OUND ng OF ng % ":
:1:
.:, '.:
'·~ ..', IDENTIFICATION SPIKE RECOVERED RECOVERY
""
II 2-chlorophenol 50 43 86 "
"
4 ...... .;,:..:
! 'l'
d
1.
· 1,3-dichlorobenzene 50 29 58
~
U, '' ·1 2,4-dichlorophenol 50 46 92
F~·-
I .. di-n-octvlphthalate 50 29 58
,1. ·,.'I
I
I
I IJ T
,•t ' ':
fluoranthene 50 50 100
'.\I naphthalene 50 34 68
: "·
: ..."'~
II .·.::::.f!:\
rt~" t·
11~ f.
'I nitrobenzene
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
50
50
36
29
72
58
Cl
_... _,,. '.~r~~ .
,.
II.. '
.• :

Sample Date 7 /11/84
:~~···,, !-''
'•j
Extraction Date 9/7 /84

Analysis Date 9/19/84
·~i> Internal Standard (IS) - Level 20 ug/1
" ..
II "
deuterated phenanthrene - Recovery
Surrogate Standard (SSl) - Level
120%
120 lJg/l ,.
.., .
. r~ •
'•
', .~· -~-
2-f luorophenol - Recovery 36%
' Surrogate Standard (SS2) - Level 120 µg/l ...~ .
.
II ,';;. :~
,: pentafluorophenol - Recovery
Surrogate Standard (SSJ) - Level
27%
120 µg/l
decaf luorobiphenvl - Recovery 46%
1.~
II '/1~·
Surrogate Standard (SS4) - Level·
2-fluorobiphenyl - Recovery
100 ug/l
52%
"
Iii ., ' ' ! . '. ~

~
. \ - ,. '
;,;:
.
.;:• ;, . :\
~: '
~ ..
(
" l
;. !~L ·r'-." · : •,
m __::_,.,_-1--.F---"--·--·-:_·._::_~:·_·>_"·_ _ ·;
·~·-· j{
• :1.
lI "
J'
:·: .•·
"i
,.
FOR RECRA ENVIRONlfENTAL LABORATORIES _.a.c;;__ _
';:
L :> :
'
·"'
:. ,,f·
' .
\ECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. 084-898.
I •
0
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
H2M
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
:· PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES .. : ·~ .
t' ~' .
:· :~.
QUALITY CONTROL
Report Date: · 10/3/84

",
'I
PESTICIDE ~ECOVERY ANALYSIS OF

»'I
SAMPLE GILL CREEK
COMPOUND ng OF ng %
IDENTIFICATION SPIKE RECOVERED RECOVERY ','
"
aldrin 0.26 0.20 77
I,·'
y-BHC 0.24 0.19 79
., ':
, r' 4,4'-DDE 0.25 0.20 80 {;
a-endosulfan 0.66 0.61 92

{· ,.1 .,
' I
endrin 0.23 0.29 126' ::· ~
heptachlor 0.24 0.18 75

'
1
'• "
·t
;
'
.:
r,
. . ,_
. i :·
.·.:..· '.I,
.,·I
' ~.
• ~I,.
., ... :
'f,'
.:·~r: ..; ~ t , .
.. n~''i' (. 1 "
,, __ :· d1
~;:._ ·;
j
{~ . ;; ·-"
:-~_/ FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 'l "'. .
·1"
,~·
. •"
J':-
i
l
.
.':
DATE
.! . f '
{" . \
"'
·~
·'.
. l
'.
i
iVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
,;o1, n •. 1.R&-RQR 'I
4) TRIP BLANKS
...
•, .
I ' :~ ,
, ..·.r
•
. '
•• 1 I
EXHIBIT II - COMPOUND LIST

. '
..
...
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER; · SD-1 Trip Blank

COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER~ 32302
DETECTION
VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION LIMIT SCAN
(UG/L) (UG/L) NUMBER
lV. CHLO ROME THANE BDL 10

2V. · VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 10
•
3V. · CHLOROETHANE BDL 10
4V. BROMOMETHANE BDL 10 ; ~'.·,
. 5V. '..ACROLEIN BDL ..._ 100 . •·•\ ~: ~·

6V. ' ACRYLONITRILE BDL 100 : : ";; ' ; • ·~. 1.
. '1
. 7V •. METHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL . 10 ' ~ .
;it' l
. av • .TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BDL · 10 ; ' .. i
9V •. 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10
lOV. 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 10 : ; \. '
UV. ; TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10

12V. CHLOROFORM BDL 10
13V. 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
14V. 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
15V. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 10
16V. BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 10 "
17V. 1,2-DICHLOROP ROP ANE BDL 10
18V." TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 10
BDL 10
-
19V. TRICHLOROETHYLENE ·
. 20V. BENZENE ('
BDL 10
, 21 V. i CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 10 ...
;
. 22V. ~· 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE · BDL 10 : ":·' : ..
" :: . 23V. i DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE .· BDL 10 ....
. ·\·:· · 24V. :. BROMOFORM . : · BDL 10 ,.1.-- ''..
·' ~· 25V. ~. 1,1,2 ,2-TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ·: BDL 10 '.
~ t;' . ' ~
··~
..
· ·.. i 26V. :: 1,1,2 ,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL· 10 . ···,·'
BDL. 10 " "

27V. :'.TOLUENE
28V •. CHLO ROBENZENE BDL • 10 '-.
-,
.29V. ETHYLBENZENE BOL 10
30V. 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BOL 10 . '
' ..
31V. DICHLOROOIFLUOROMETHANEt BDL
,32V. BIS(CHLOROMETHYL)ETHERt BOL .: j
: I,.
,. tsee Data Report Notice

1·<· ,,, .'
I
I
. .: ;1 ~ , .? . '·. ' ' : • ;' •
' ·. : .. . ,'-,·· ' . '
l
. '
·.··· ·' ' .....
.« .~~/
. ~· .
+ ~.. ' .
..·.
~·-1 • • : \ • •• j ~~ !.· :.:! ! ij f,'

LABORATORY CHRONICLE ' ...
.. :t.,
. :'.:}{'«.i
• ' ~-· ~ • 1., . ' ' :
' .. ~ •.<'! ., 1.
" ;.
i
.~:·
,! :
;
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER' SD-1 ·Trip Blank
COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER' 32302
.l
..
'.{_ :.
'
i!
. ,·,
Date
•
Received/Refrigerated 07/27/84
..
Organics
Extracted Not Required
Analyzed
''l:: 1. Volatiles 07/30/84 ·,
'
'.;·.,' .
.
:- '
·i 2. Acid Not Requested

t,
l'.".
.' ~ . 3. Base/Neutrals Not Requested
Pesticf des/PCBS Not Requested '•.
i'
Metals Not Requested

Cyanide Not Requested.··
3. Phenols Not Requested
:···
' ·~i: ,, ..
~ .· ,, .
\ " ..~ ' ..

I:
. .
~
i I, .
I'
'r .
.. ..
''
'
:. i J
• . . . .,;. '. ·i
.. ; I; .
... EXHIBIT II - COMPOUND LIST

~ . ' !'
..
l "
li · ·I.
' . ;., :.·:.
I :•,l•; ,; .: \·
r> tr~.~ ). SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: . SD-2 Tr1 p Blank. ·"'

COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: · 32300 I
•
•
•
. : ..
-l '. .! ~ •
'. · DETECTION .: f : I~ , • •" t' I
i·:;;~ ; ; VOLATILE ORGANICS . CONCENTRATION LIMIT SCAN . ·

(UG/L) (UG/L) NUMBER ;,
' ••• j
' .~ '
' . 1V. '; CHLOROMETHANE BDL 10

BDL 10
- :i' ~~: ·: ~~~6~o~~~~~~DE BDL 10
• .: 4V. · BROMOMETHANE BDL 10
. 5V •. AC ROLE IN BDL 100
.: 6V. ACRYLONITRILE BDL 100
. , 7V •. METHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL 10
. av. TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10
9V •. 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE · BDL 10
lOV. 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
BDL 10 '
UV •. TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
12V •. CHLOROFORM BDL 10
13V. , 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
· 14V .. ..: 1 ,1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
15V ••. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 10
16V. BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 10 ~·'I t ..
·;: · 17V. , 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 10

. 18V •. TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROP ROPENE BOL 10
. 19V. ~· TRICHLOROETHYLENE ' BDL 10
" 20V. . BENZENE BDL . 10
• '" · ·:· 21V. ·.~ CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 10
: ~·
. 22v. ,; r,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
· · .. / ·.23V. DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 10
· '. ,, , 24V. :; BROMOFORM . BDL 10
. . 25V. ;1 1, 1, 2, 2- TETRACHLO ROETHYLENE BDL 10
: .. 26V. ·~ 1,1,2 ,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 10
. " . 27V. ·1. TOLUENE BDL 10
28V. :• CHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 ..
· · 29V. ! ETHYLBENZENE BDL 10 . • '!
30V. :i 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER · BDL 10 ...

11 ' '
· 31 V•.· DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANEt BDL

3~V. :i BIS(CHLOROMETHYL)ETHERt BDL
.' .:::':.:.. ::, ii' 1 '
"
, ·!·\: _:
: I
•.: .
', ;: ". ·~
BDL=BELOW DETECTION.LIMIT ·, 0
I'
· '·tsee Data Report Not1ce

I,•
.
.• ••t'.
~ ~-
;· .
.. i;' '
' "~
:~ ·'
j
.....
~·. I
'I·
; SAMPLE IDENTIFIER; S0-2 Trip Blank

COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER~ 32300
"
.~.... ~·
. Date
I !
Received/Refrigerated 07/27/84
T ' ! <
. -~ ': ' ~ ' ;, i

. .. ·-·~ Organics .. !
: ·: I
Extracted Not Required
~:1
' . Analyzed
I.····'
"
1. Volatiles 07 /30/84 J
2. Acid Not Requested
·~··
'
•· 3. Base/Neutrals . Not Requested
4. Pes ti c,1 des/PCBS Not Requested
•' .
Inorganics
. ~ .
1. Metals Not Requested :r''
·'
2. Cyanide Not Requested

..I
' -: I·~,
l ,:;,· ·.
...' ·:.
l ·-: ! .' .. •'. •

~ ; ~. ·..
.\' . .;• l ':f ' : '
...
r
. .. . .i :,
~ . ' ·{
" ~- J • t;J·. !~ ;' . \'
.
, ..
. . ,1,
1 '
...j
·.·.
. '} :·
. . .,:i .j
•" >;
..
...
l . I~
. ..
..4
SAMPLE IOENTIFIER:i SD-3 Trip Blank .

COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: · 32298
· DETECTION . '
VOLATILE ORGANICS . CONCENTRATION LIMIT SCAN ·i
(UG/L) (UG/L) NUMBER , :
.. . ~,
1V.. CHLO ROME THANE BDL 10

2V. VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 10
3V. CHLOROETHANE BDL 10
ti · 4V. t
5V •.
BROMOMETHANE
ACROLEIN
BDL
BDL
10
100
6V. ACRYLONITRILE BDL 100
7V. METHYLENE CHLORIDE BOL 10
av. TRI CHLO ROFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10
9V. 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10
lOV. 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
llV. TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL . 10
12V.' CHLOROFORM BDL 10
13V. · 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
.... 14V •• 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
15V. ·.· CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BOL 10
· 16V. " BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE BDL 10
17V.: 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BOL 10
18V ~ ·.: TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 10
19V. · TRICHLOROETHYLENE i BDL 10
fJ ·~. 20V.. BENZENE BDL 10 ;..
...
. '
21V.; CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 10

. 22V. I 1,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE .· BDL 10
,; 23V. ,: DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE . BDL 10
24V. · BROMOFORM · BDL 10 .,
25V.. 1,1,2 ,2-TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10
26V .' 1,1,2 ,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 10
27V. · TOLUENE BDL 10
28V. CHLOROBENZENE .. BOL 10
29V. ETHYLBENZENE BDL 10
30V •. 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 10
31 V. · DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANEt , . BOL
32V.' BIS(CHLOROMETHYL)ETHERt BOL ". i
·' ·, ..
.'<1;~ ...
' BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT " ',
• t •
''
jl
' l : ( ,.·
tsee Data Report Notice

..
' : '~;. j • "'
' ~ ' '
. , I:
'.· •.
.' •i
,I'
'l
·,·
: .·• "
: ': ' t. '•
'"
' ;/
' I: : :,::jt.<:~,,~l , { I' '·.:·
.1 •••
" . -, ... t
~ l· \·t ., "''.'.• ;
,.·11:· .'.';~ :! ··;: :.·. . LABORATORY CHRONICLE

'. ;· 1,
.: '
•! J
( f·1,
.. ".;.
"' .'·.
'·
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER~ SD-3 Trip Blank

..... 1· ~ COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER~ 32298
•
~;. .
.
~·,
"
'. :· l ~
Date
Received/Refrigerated 07 /27 /84
. .: ~ ';
~ ' .-\
Organics
Extracted .Not Required
·Analyzed
•
1. Volatiles 07/30/84
. ,'
.·
"
•...
;~ Acid r Not Requested
. ;.
3. Base/Neutrals Not Requested
4. Pesticides/PCBS Not Requested
. 't',.
' ~' .
Inorganics
1. Metals Not Requested
2. Cyanide Not Requested . ,·,.'•
·~ ' .
3. Phenols Not Requested '' ·: ·, 'i '~
·)-.
: :. :, ':; 1
:
J· ~.>:.·
. !'
. ' ··.··'
·i('
- ;'•
' '.
1.
/\"''
' '
... 'I- ·.
' i.
;. . ~
,, .·. :
' I ' .
. ;,: CompuChem LABORATORIES

. ..·<~r~·; ;·~.• :. /. • ·-1 - \
-.,
·~·~. /~ ··.', :~'.. :~
•
....
.
::7.r t". 'r
J • ~- _.:. ; ,;·
t 'f ~ t
!.: REPORT OF DATA

: ..
. '
'j
... \.• .
/}'SAMPLE IDENTIFIER:- SD-3 Trip Blank. COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32298 .. ' ~
,.:
!•i, · · < S0-2 Trip Blank 32300
... . ... S0-1 .,
Trip Blank 32302
'I
-~-·
; .
·'
~· '
". }
:'
'\ • .} .; I •
-.
jl
, . SUBMITTED TO :r
~· -.
Mr. Ernie Schroder

· · Engineering Science, Inc.
·'. 57 Executive Park South . ..•
···,Suite 590
·,\Atlanta, GA 30329 .
: j
.r
i· !
.·.
·.t. "..
"'
-. .:,1·~1 :
.
'
...
. ;
.,,
-
@,c<i¥iu u.cloo&»mcQ
DANA A. SCAMMELL ~
'
.· ' - ~ • . '1
R. L. MYERS .. PH.O •• PRESIDENT;~.. .·~, I

' ' . . • '- ',1, 't . ;
'·' ' ·..
ROBERT E. MEIERER ,;
DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE ;\., 1 •• '
; x-~bi:'. ".
-~
·:?-i'
..
..
' '
':. !"
·"'
..
,I DATA REPORT NOTICE
CompuChem employs Methods 624 and 625 for GC/MS analysis of organics in liquid
matrices. These methods were proposed on December 3, 1979 by the U.S.E.P.A. in
Volume 44 of .the Federal Register. These methods were subsequently revised and
reissued .in July, 1982 as publication EPA-600/4-82-057. The EPA Environmental
Monitoring and Support Laboratory (EMSL-Cincinnati) has subsequently issued
method modifications which provide for the analysis of solid matrices. These
modifications ~pecify changes in the sample preparation procedures.
received material.
toxic polluant list (40 CFR Part 401) by EPA or the detenuination by EPA that
the referenced methods may not be optimized for certain compounds (EPA-600/4-
~2-057) originally incorporated by the methods.
CompuChenY® presents these compounds in its sample data report for completeness
as many of the government compound list forms continue to display the affected
compounds. For consistency, these compounds are reported as "BDL" or "Below
Detection Limit" as they are either not likely to exist in the sample or are
.. ".,
Com~ound Name
Dichlorodifluoromethane
*Trichlorofluoromethane
Bis(Chloromethyl)Ether
GC/MS Fraction
Volatile
Volatile
Volatile
Federal Register
46FR2264
46FR2264
46FR10723
Date
1/8/81
1/8/81
2/4/81
t •
: *While this compound has been deleted, CompuChenY® continues to identify

. and quantitate for it.
.··~.
· ..
:~
t
l. '
'
l •
.
"'
'
'
'
.
:.· •
GOMPUCHEM LABORATORIES IS NO UJNGEE : ·,, · · ·
r ·'
AFFILIATED WITH MEAD CORPQ~!\TiON.

. i
~ : 'j: ~: I :
. 'l ' t•
. ,' ·~ -.:(:\ :· I
. " .~( .. '.·

,
•;
, l• l l. •,
.
+I
..
~ I
"•..-::.:.: ..·
< ' { 1
'•
I ' ~ ', • •
'. ,·
,·,
, ..
".
;•-><• ..•• , ..
.
J
.
.. ·. ., .. r
~-
•
.. :" . ..
''!''
..
. . '
~ :• : J •
'':;,,··· . . . - i· .
., ' '
\ . ''
,
~ ' i' ...
; .
. .
.. . .
' .
' ' ,. •••• j •
'
I , ... '
' ~_" : l .· ... !. '
.·'
. ' Telephone: 91 9-549-8263
LABORATORIES ,;1
:.I;·
800-334-8525 '. !.
'. . " August 7, 1984
.:L:~·:
...
'\·
I
'.·
30329
· Dear Mr. Schroder~
•-
Thank you for selecting CompuChelff'ID Laboratories for your recent sample anal-
ysis. We have completed the analysis that you requested and have enclosed a
sunmary of the CompuChe!ff'ID data for your review. Additional data details are
available for purchase if you require them.
'• "
' '
.. :, the December 3, 1979, Federal Register, and we have reported all priority
' i pollutant concentrations which have exceeded these limits {or their equiva-
. 'lent for solid matrices). In addition, we have permanently stored a complete
·record of your data· on magnetic tape. This includes chromatograms, mass
. your original data is readily available for future reference. Should you
1/800-334-8525 •
.·.In order to expedite data to you, we have forwarded the results for all
....... completed analyses. If you submitted more samples than are included in the
~ enclosed .results, the data will be forthcoming upon completion of our final
- '
. review. I'!
· · · ;. · Your confidence in our CompuChelff'ID service is appr:eciated. We look forward to

·.. ;· a continuing association., · }.
· Sincerely, ... ."".
• 1·
( . ' ' , .. t '

.i
: . :' Customer Service Dept. ·~t
· ii . CompuChem® ..
. ' . ·;.
. ,, ... 'l
1
;, .: Enclosure::
f ' : :: I
: · ..> 1
• ·' Report=" so ..3 . Trip B1ank . 32298
• ' 1"'; . ·.'
, i ; . ;-.:.·
SD-2 Tr i p Bl an k. 32300
; . , i, :
:1: .
SD-1 Trip Blank 32302
• '.I'
; ..
5) SEDIMENT DATA
·1
.. '.·
,. ' !
•' ·:
.: ~:
•' j
" '\.
': _.':... ·,:

COMPUCHEM
lABORATORJES 11
"'. ..
. 1·
August 29, 1984 ·

.... ' . Mr. Ernie Schroder
Engineering Science, Inc.·
··· ,.· 57 Executive Park South
Suite 590
. Atlanta, GA 30329
• Dear
.. :
~r. Schroder: SEP .0 41984
.Thank you for selecting CompuChem® Laboratories for your recent sample anal-
ysis. We have completed the analysis that you requested and have enclosed a
summary of the CompuChem® data for your review. Addjtional data details are
available for purchase if you require them.
.. ' .~
" (
· }·the December 3, 1979, Federal Register, and we have reported all priority
pollutant concentrations which have exceeded these limits (or their equiva-
lent for solid matrices). In addition, we have permanently stored a complet~_
·record of your data on magnetic tape. This includes chromatograms, mass ; ... ,,
_ . your original data is readily available for future reference. Should you
' require additional information from your data base, please contact us at
.:1/800-334-8525.
'1.> . In,. ~rder to expedite data to you, ~e have forwarded
the results for all
completed analyses. If you submitted more samples than are included in the
enclosed results, the data will be forthcoming upon completion of our final ....
,, rev,~1ew. ;·. ·
.,
. Your confidence in our CompuChem® service is appreciated. We look forward to .
. a continuing association.
'
...
"
. ..·i . '
Sincerely,
..· . · ;
I;· ,; : ~ :
1 1{r:. :..
· Customer Service Dept •
.CompuChem®
Enclosure: '
~ •' ·~ .>
.. , ~l . ·<
Report: SD-3 32411 .. ·
SD-2 32412 ·'
S0-1 32413 'I
COMPUCHEM LABOAAlOAIES, INC.• P.O. Box 12652 • 3308 Chapel Hiii/Neison Highway· Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 • (919) 549-8263 . !
DATA REPORT NOTICE
-
~· Volume 44 of the Federal Register. These methods were subsequently revised and
• reported are based on processing the method specified sample size of as-
1'. received material.
toxic pollutant list (40 CFR Part 401) by EPA or the determination by EPA that
the referenced methods ma~ not be optimized for certain compounds (EPA-600/4-
. 82-057) originally incorporated by the methods.
CompuChem® presents these compounds in its sample data report for completeness
~ as many of the government compound list forms continue to display the affected
compounds. For consistency, these compounds are reported as 11 BOL 11 or "Below
Detection Limit 11 as they are either not likely to exist in the sample or are
,,, not l 1kely to be detected by the method. Those compounds which have actually
· · '· Compound Name · · GC/MS Fraction Federal Register Date
( Dichlorodifluoromethane Volatile 46FR2264 1/8/81 .,
· *Trichlorofluoromethane Volatile 46FR2264 1/8/81·
Bis{Chloromethyl}Ether Volatile 46FR10723 2/4/81
'
. ;-i··
*While this compound has been deleted, CompuChem® continues to· identify
and quantitate for it •
. .
..
,
CDMPUCHEM · "
lABOR<\TORIES
.•,..
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SD-3

Samples:
Received 7-26-84
Analyzed 8-02-84
'..
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SD-3 COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32411
SD-2 32412
SD-1 32413
SUBMITTED TO:
·. Mr. Ernie Schroder
Suite 590
Atlanta, GA 30329
., .
@a~·t;d~rJP.
· !ANA A. SCAMMELL
R. L. MYERS, PH.D., PRESIDENT

ROBERT E. MEIERER . .''
DIR ECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE
, ..
-
...·,1· .,,
..
' !~
L''
.... ,-
l . ' •• -', j: ..
'
COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 3241.l
.. '. ;_r. INORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT

" . :! ' .·PRIORITY POLLUTANTS (MG/KG) (MG/KG)
•
...
14~.~
;;,5·:):.
' :
. ~ ) :·~
't • ~
.
..
:
'.,
1
·.j.
.
CYANIDE, TOTAL
:f
.
BDL 1.0
I'
+-· 'i
.· .. :
........·
·: ii'
' ~· ·. ' I • ~'
'' ' ·i
l ·,'.·
'
;
.
. , ·1
. ' :i ;~1.• :
' '-'·'
.: .. . : ~. . ' :
'•', ,.:1:
·:.,
.
•''.
....
., ·:
I ~-
.. ,; ~
) ·.
"
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: S0-2

COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32412 ·, .
. ;' INORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT

.: : 'PRIORITY POLLUTANTS (MG/KG) (MG/KG)
. ... ~ '
Ir 14M.• ,;: _CYANIDE, TOTAL BDL 1.0
I
,•
!~-.· ~;
~ • : -_:! .
.·... ::.:1.: r,
"' .:-'
i·:·(~.'.)"-~·-.'.'
,.
r- ''1' :·.'.:!::;;,::;. .,
·,
··; -:
...." ....'
... '
.'
!1 ._'. f
.~
..
' ' d
; '' ... " . "·

•' ' 'J
·.; j
"I .. ·!'. . I
'.
:
.: '.
..
' 1
.
,,.·
:1.•
'· . 't. ·. ,:·
' ~- ;
,,
1. ' '
... •• '
~
, '.
.. ~. ' ••• ,;'· • .. : J
; .
:''
. ''
••
. o I
.I "•)
. ·:' . "· !, '. I

'..-.'·! •'
.: .
~··' ". { ; .
. •,
..l •
' '
, I "
EXHIBIT II - COMPOUND LIST i ~-
: ··
' ...
, -~ r
; . '~
. :··
SAMPLE· IDENTIFIER: SD-1
INORGANICS CONCENTRATION ·DETECTION LIMIT

PRIORITY POLLUTANTS . . (MG/KG) (MG/KG)
r
' '
'.\.!
14M. CYANIDE, TOTAL BDL 1.0

...
·'
. '·
"
i:
'·i -.::·· ·:' .·. '
'
.
·.l
;, '
r
:. i •
. ·· ..
:.
. .
. • ..
. :·~\' :.; . _•
·);:;:
. ..... ~ - '
''
. i ·:
, . ,,,
' i'
,•
.....
'. ,:.
';.
'~' ';'- i'. l,,
/.
·.I. ,l:'. " " '
; ''! ~·· '! ' "

':.:. !_",j' .; '
" .
.,
'\. I
J. '. :j.
... :, ....
. • • ·l
' ·~' .
'( :i '. ;~
... . '~
CDMPUCHEM
lABOMTORIES
·, .
..August 31, 1984
'.··-i:
·Mr.' Ernie Schroder i' •
Engineering Science, Inc. ! .. · .) ~.

Suite 590 f.1~'.n~::n:-·:i :;._:. .. ;·~;.~ . . ;,
; .•t:1~1Hr.
Atlanta, GA 30329
Dear Mr. Schroder:
: .. ,.
Thank you for selecting CompuChem® Laboratories for your recent sample anal- " \ •,'
~ , .r
,j (
ysis. We have completed the analysts that you requested and have enclosed a
sunmary of the CompuChem® data for your review. Additional data details are. . ~ : '
" .available for purchase if you require them.

"
··.As you know., EPA has proposed detection limits for the-priority pollutants in
.. ; the December 3, 1979, Federal Register, and we have reported all priority .. "
·,:pollutant concentrations which hav~ exceeded these limits (or their equiva- '
'.
... : lent for solid matrices). In addition, we have pernianently stored a complete ,•, ' · ' '
'''
record of your data on magnetic tape. Tht s includes chromatograms, mass

your original data is readily available for future reference. Should you .. t. ,
•·•
,

1/800-334-8525. . . ' . I'. "
t ,;·; t- 1 ·'
' .··h
~ In order to expedite data to you, we have forwarded the results for all ... . '•'.'.
completed analyses. If you submitted more samples than are included in_ the I, : '.r' •' ~ ,
enclosed. results, the data will be forthcoming upon completion of. our final
review. :i
t
.,;_ .. • ... ·
·~
'1
';... • 1. '.
:(.
.\ '
'
/ \"··.;p:·: .. ::'._ ·. ·. ,I i~
•;'
• ·Your: confidence 1n our CompuChem® : .
,.'a continuing association. , · . · ' '
. . :,. r·
1
. ". ·\.
">·sincerely, '· ·
'· 1 ,, .. " I'
Customer Service Dept.

·compuChem®
' '
'. . I
. Enclosure: ...
· ., ·.Report: SD-2 32299
.·:.:;I>·\'~
. ,· ·,
·,
..
.:·' {.:· •. ·' i' .
' !~
'
. ;., •'.
'; .
}OMP~C~EM LA~ORAlORIES, INC.· P.O. Box 12652 • 3308 Chapel Hiii/Neison Highway- .Research Triangle Park, NC 2nD9-{919) 549-8263
·~~ ~1·' / '
• ,'! ,
1·
DATA.REPORT NOTICE
. "
Volume 44 of the Federal Register. These methods were subsequently revised and, ,
Monitoring and Support Laboratory (EMSL-Cincinnati} has subsequently issued ·
·modifications specify changes in the sample preparation procedures.
. .. ; .
••
•,«; :i ~
Additionally, for solid samples detection limits and any analytical results. -. ·;· .~.t ·I
reported are based on processing the method specified sample size of as- ,"
. ,•,
1' ,, !
. received material.
'·. .\,:' i '
.toxic pollutant list (40 CFR Part 401} by EPA or the determination by EPA that
the referenced methods may not be optimized for certain compounds (EPA-600/4-
82-057) originally incorporated by the methods.
CompuChem® presents these compounds in its sample data report for completeness
as many of the government compound list forms continue to display the affected·.
compounds. For consistency, these compounrls are reported as 11 BDL 11 or 11 Below :
Detection Limit" as they are either not likely to exist in the sample or are ·
.been deleted are listed below with the Federal Register deletion reference •
•
. '
' ;
Compound Name GC/MS Fraction Federal Register Date
·~ t.
" Diehl orodi fl uoromethane Volatile 46FR2264 1/8/81

·· *Tri chl orofl uoromethane .. i. Volatile 46FR2264 1/8/81 .·'
I
.
~'
,-7 Bis(Chloromethyl )Ether ·' . , Volatile 46FR10723. '2/4/81 ' 1 '·> ":
...•· ! ·~: .
. I
been deleted, CompuChem® continues to identify
.· :- ':'
'.
·•. J·
• ' f, . ' ••
.. ~., ~. . ,
.. ~ . . i'
' •: ,·'
}\ ~..J.
. ; '·"' ~.
·".
CbMPUCHEM
lABOMTORIES
I
i
REPORT OF DATA
-
•
- COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32299
SUBMITTED TO:
Mr.·Ernie Schroder
· Engineering Science, Inc.
Suite 590 . ·''
Atlanta, GA 30329 ·
r
,., -,
..•r
,;
/[Jif."-efcAM~Lrk""'""°a .· ~. ·. ·. •.·
. TECHNICAL SPECIALIST, OPERATIONS,: ..
R. L. MYERS, PH.D., PRESIDENT

. . '
':··
ROBERT E. MEIERER ,
,,,(;
. ,. DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE
:1' ":
"'·· :,
·'
•. ·"'·
. j'i
..."' ,.
, ·~:'
!
LABORATORY CHRONICLE ..

., I
Date i.
., . Received/Refrigerated 07/27/84
....
I'•'
Organics ··,' '
Extracted 08/01/84
:·i
·.,; ., Analyzed i.
1. Volatiles 07 /03/84
2. Acid 08/08/84
. ~ \i :·:.
:' ·r • ·...
3. Base/Neutrals 08/06/84
4. Pesticid~s/PCBS 08/06/84
:i ,·
.. .'·
1. Metals. 08/14/84;
·.;
.. 2.";· Cyanide Not Requested : ...
•• ' 1 ~ 'f
"', ,·:
I
.1; ' ' -~

~: . '
3~ . Phenols Not Requested •'1 '

.. !,
: t. •
• : '· .; ·:: ( ' :1
' f 't '.,i 1~
I '
' ''• 1·\:'; .. ; t. ~\ ':·
' i' ,.. '. ·.
' .. ~ .. "f'i' . '.. ' ,,
\~ ,. ;:'.i\Y:. '; ".. :';.I:"
' ~: i '
, "
'i ; " ,
' • ~· l ' t'.

. f'
I'
:'
. ' '
'.:· . 11 : :· :•
; "t
·, ;
. .
~ '
COMPOUND LIST VOLATILES ORGANICS
I i_
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SD-2 ,: ;
COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBE~: 32299

' . ~ -
· DETECTION
CONCENTRATION LIMIT
' ' ,{ :. ' (UG/KG) (UG/KG)
;
lV •. CHLOROMETHANE . BDL 10
2V •. VINYL CHLORIDE · ·,' BDL 10 ·. f;
~_. .• , 3V .' ~; CHLOROETHANE BDL 10

_, ...· 4V •·i: BROMOMETHANE BDL 10 \ .'.
t. 5V. ·.; ACROLE IN BDL 100 .
" '
.L 6V. ~· ACRYLONITRILE BOL 100

. 7V. ~·· METHYLENE CHLORIDE NDB* 10
av.~ TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10
.. 9V ./ 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10
. : lOV. ,: 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE · BDL 10 ,) .
;'.
. = llV.t TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10 I.-•~·

~
.
.:J:.
'
, 1 : 12V CHLOROFORM BDL 10 ' '}

'"'
. ·.
, . : 13V •· ·: 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 10 :{:: ;
~- . 14V •. '.; 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 10

15V.\1 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 10 ·.;
16V.'' BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 10
·. 17V.:~ 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BOL 10
, , lBV .'i:i TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 10 . -, ,,\
, : 19V. '· TRICHLOROETHYLENE :, · .r BDL 10

l.' • 20V •. ' BENZENE .. BDL 10 l ' ..
.. · · 21 V·. ~. CIS-1,3-0ICHLOROPROPENE • BDL 10 ·: \
. · 22V. r! 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE. . · ·. BOL 10 "-·" '~. , . ,

I.• ···,,
.· . 23V. : OIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ' . · . . · BOL 10
.: :, 24V.: BROMOFORM . · · .. \' · ·. ···. BOL 10
· ;.; 25V :'fr'
1 ,1 ,2 ,2-TETRACHLOROETHYLENE . BDL 10
• · 26V •. k 1, 1, 2, 2- TETRACHLOROETHANE BOL 10
, ;1 27V •. : TOLUENE . BOL 10
: 28V • 1. CHLOROBENZENE .. BOL 10
• :'. 29V .:·\; ETHYLBENZENE . BOL 10
·. '. 30V .'•'.· 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BOL 10
.' ' ': 31 V.';/ OICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANEt BOL
32V .,:?:>BIS( CHLOROMETHYL )ETHERt BDL
.· . : ;:\~;:\'): ; ' ~
.,
... :~/i 'i: BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT

'° ";., ;:L
.t :'
*See Qual 1ty Assurance Notice
>.tsee,Data Report Notice

' . . '' ~ .. ; .
'. >f ~..
..
·j,.'
,1', '
·,.
('' '
..
. ';:'-"~.·_;1>{-~· .;_t ~. '.
.
. ·. :: . . ,.
.
~
~ : ' .: ..
'
:,.
: :i-. :~, :•·' I
·, '•
,. ..
'
'
'
'
.. QUALITY ASSURAl~CE NOTICE·
......
'
f· .
·~-.'
: .:
I, ·
CompuChem Sample No. 32299 .. ~ ' ; ' .
Although not required by the Federal Register; December 3, "'i979 (modified J~ly, '.,"'-.·
. 1982) Volatile Method 624 procedure, the laboratory prepares VOA blanks when
compositing water samples and preparing low and medium level hazardous waste.·
VOA samples. This is to insure that the glassware used is free from con-
tamination, and to monitor the possibility of cross-contamination from high
levels of volatile organic compounds in some samples and the laboratory
atmosphere.
· ! The compositing or method blank (H 32330 ) prepared .with this sample contained···.:
·.·: the compound(s) listed below. Sample data associated with this blank have been •;,. ... ~ ·
•.... . adjusted and/or flagged a~cor.di.~~- ~o the EPA-recommended methods. . 1
.••
. "·}:. :"(.'~ ~-~~ .~~:-~~ 'i·· -~

ii I t :<t~-,~·.·~ ! '
;.\,";\: Concentration
Found In Sample Applicable
· · Compound ( s) (ug/kg) Qualifier*
•. . .
Methylene Chloride 44 NOB I.
·;·'
"i .:'
;· ...
.''.: . '·:. -..~ .
., ;. :
;
·; ,_
i'
'..:t
..
.....
''.·:' .
.. ,,
, '.;'•I. .
.... ' \.:
. i .. · ; I•
~
...
:- '
1'., ' . ..
' ~ . COMPOUND LIST ACID EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS
.' ..
"~ .
~-;. . .;
' ; '.
...
..
, , .. F
~
•. :·1
~1>
.;»' SAMPLE IDENTIFIER:· SD-2 •" ··,

~ - . ;.
;;-,,
DETECTIONt t• '
•; ,
CONCENTRATION LIMIT ".'·'
,' I
!; it ,·::.
1.:.1, ; . , ' '

(UG/KG) (UG/KG) ; ' . - ! -..-_ ~ '
, ;, 1
f ~·
BOL 500
BDL 500 . i ..t.
BDL 500
BDL 500
BDL 500
BDL 500 ·1
'!
BDL 500
BDL 5000
.. BDL 500 .
. '
BOL· 5000
BDL 500 •I
',I,
>.1 .. .; ..
.i ' i . ' ·/;
'.
I'
; ....
• 1•,
. '
I;,::;·,"' h:·i•. ¥DL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT

. ·.. ;.-:,,. . See. Data Report Notice ..:,1 ·
. ;~. --.. :. i .
! i. . · •, ,·.,
'" ;~·~ ! . . i.;,,.
r• . . :. :. :;
.. 1: ,: ..
.
~ ·,
' ·" ..'i . ... ...
. j
•
.
J
,,!..
,,
.
COMPOUND LIST BASE-NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS

.. ·/::' ~:.: . .
. ;\ ~
·! .. ~
' I
' ·;:r'
»{ • :
. .· .
.·.:· :,
... ' .. ".
'; ~
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SD-2 .

}~ ~ '.
~.
. .'
); .
,.
. ·.. ' ;; .. f rr ."·
"' ~• I .
-~ ,:
.j
.;
DETECTIQNt
... CONCENTRATION LIMIT
''
(UG/KG) (UG/KG) I's,
.a lB. · N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE BOL 200

~ ~· , 2B. BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL} ETHER BOL 200 • .~
i'
: I ; '
.'3B. · 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE BOL 200

: 4B •. 1,4-0ICHLOROBENZENE BOL 200
, , . 5B. '1,2-0ICHLOROBENZENE BOL 200
· 6B. 'BIS {2-CHLOROISOPROPYL} ETHER BOL 200 .-l. '
' , 78. HEXACHLOROETUAUE BOL 200 '!'' .,
.·BB. N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPYLAMINE BDL 200 ·"

l ~ ' '
· · 98. · NITROBENZENE 8DL 200 .j ..

200 .'
. lOB •. ISOPHORONE BOL .r . '.":.'
. ·:
118. · 8IS{2-CHLOROETHOXY} METHANE BDL 200 ';•i'
.128. «1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL 200

13B •. NAPHTHALENE BDL 200
14B •. HEXACHLOROBUTAOIENE BOL 200 \ .'
158. HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTAOIENE 1
• BOL 200
168. 2-CHLORONAPHT~ALENE . BOL 200. ,,
178. · OIMETHYLPHiHALATE r BDL 200
" 18B. ACENAPHTHYLENE · ~ .. BDL 200
. 19B.: 2,6-0INITROTOLUENE ;, . BDL 200 . ·; i'·
208. ·. ACENAPHTHENE :'.' : . · BDL 200

218. 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE \ BDL 200 ~! '
. 228 •. OIETHYLPHTHALATE. • ~ BOL 200 'J.

·"
~ ~F«. 23B. ···i~!
3
FLUORENE \. · BDL 200 ..
- ..
I .
. .'\: 248.·~.:.; 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BOL 200 ~ '
· .: . 258. : DIPHENYLAMINE ( N-NITROSO) BOL. 200

26B. , 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZ08ENZENE) BDL 200 I '
\ ·. 278 •.. 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 200 . I ··I
28B •. • HEXACHLOR08ENZENE BOL 200
;" .
1
;~ ~ BOL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
"
:see ~ata Report Notice
' ,·
I.·
,.
'"
*
,:
''
·.
'· .·.
. ,,,..
· .• ·I
.... . •' .;
. ~:.
'"
COMPOUND LIST BASE-NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS (Page Two)
i;

....
....
......
,29B. PHENANTHRENE
30B.: ANTHRACENE
31B. ! DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
32B. FLUORANTHENE
33B. BENZIDINE
· 34B. PYRENE
35B. BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE
36B. BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
37B. 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
.38B. CHRYSENE
. 39B. BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
40B. Dl-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
·4lB. : BENZO ( B) FLUORANTHENE
"42B. ; BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
·· 43B. ':• BENZO(A)PYRENE
·. 44B • .:: INDEtJO(l ,2,3-C,D)PYRENE. r·
; 45B._::; DIBnlZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
. 46B. · BENZO(G,H,l)PERYLENE
,• .• ,!• ' I
• ~!, ~· 1 : .... :1 ~ • ': ..
I 1.' •
. '
' ' ~ i'.· ; t ~ . ·' : : :
}..
..
, BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
. tsee Date Report Notice
. '
·-~~ ,. ~·
' • ~ . ' •; I
.' .. . ·~
'"
COMPOUND LIST PESTICIDES/PCB 1 S

.-:,: ·i· _;' ' .•.
;. ~
, 'I
'•'
"·' I ·.: .,
,. .
DETECTIONt
CONCENTRATION LIMIT
(UG/KG) (UG/KG) ·'.. ' ..
~-
'
lP •. ALDRIN BOL 200

2P. ALPHA-BHC BOL 200
• 3P. BETA-BHC BOL 200
·: .. _ 4P. GAMMA-BHC BDL 200
SP. DELTA-BHC BDL 200
6P. CHLORDANE BDL 200
. 7P. 4,4·'-DDT BDL 200
8P. 4,4 11 -DOE BDL 200
9P. • 4,4 -DDD BOL 200
;· lOP •. · DIELDRIN BDL 200
llP. ALPHA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 200
. 12P.'. BETA-ENDOSULFAN BOL 200
13P •. ENDOSULFAN SULFATE BDL 200
14P _;' ENDRIN BOL 200
15P.' ENDRIN ALDEHYDE BOL 200
16P. '... HEPTACHLOR BOL 200 ' : ". '
17P.~,; HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE BOL 200

,; l8P ./ PCB-1242 r BDL 200
• :':I 19P.>" PCB-1254 BDL 200
· :.'20P.·: PCB-1221
•"':
.' , 'I
BDL 200
·, 21P ~::: PCB-1232
: '
1
I:,', :', r~ :;: BDL 200 .
.,' 22P. · PCB-1248 BOL · 200 .:,~
1,.
>-'\.ti ~··. ·L
;·, ;) 23P •:ii PCB-1260 ' ' " I ( ;

BDL ., 200
~1 l"K 24P .~( PCB-1016 BDL 200 . ·'~
'i' ~ .. tN 25P,;~;' ,roXAPHENE BOL 200 •\ • ..
.~ .
I
~ :J; ~J ;\~~l~1;::~rt·: J:t ::;

I •; I
. :..
"
~ ·\\' _,· --s·:~..:- /!·'.'. :' . . ~:
, HI:tl~i:r
';
., '
''.
i' ' •
·,.,,.
·' \ '1 ::~;i_ BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT .

.,. 1 ~ ..~~:.~See Data Report Notice
' ·' I
. · .·.
'
·t
) "" ,_ ;: .
• ; I.'
'
~ I I . • • 1 .:: .'
t '\}(!:
• ~ - ; -.! .
• . j
,,!.
j;
' ; .;
:''
~ .
•,
•. ' : -, ~:. :: ~-1 ~·.r

''
..
,,
:;,:
. '-, .. COMPOUND LIST INORGANICS (METALS) ' ' .,
';: < •
....
:;,.;
: ~ ",'' J ' • : ' ~·
'
'1•
; ··~ .. .
~;: .
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SD-2 1 \. "
COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32299 •.,1;, ...
• ' ' 1
·,·· i:t:,
INORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMITt

PRIORITY POLLUTANTS (UG/G) (UG/G) I
•
~·I
.1. CADMIUM, TOTAL BDL 0.20 .'• .
<:2• CHROMIUM, TOTAL 6.3 0.50

;_3. COPPER, TOTAL 8.2 1.0
.:4. LEAD, TOTAL* 7.0 0.50
\ ·: 5. MERCURY, TOTAL · 0.064 . 0.0020
. ~~ 6. NICKEL, TOTAL 8.5 1.0 . "
.
.
1
. 7. ZINC, TOTAL 34 0.20 ,'I,
; ' ~ .
". ·'".
1.
,·' .. ~· ~/\ ••• I. ... '
' ~. - .
;
.
• ·• ~'
"
, :
, .
;··' $
' '
) ..
.'. :r.i~1~i'i1d;', •.•. ;.'' . ··.,,

; ; ;.'" .'." BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT .,·, '.,
.. ',.:I,·.'.' ,, .• '. : :
,
::·~: ·",!See. Data Report Nati ce. ·
~~· /I\.:. , . . ,. ,
· I. ..
,!• •.; ' •. ;
~; .. •\ ~·
:k .··~Lead analyzed by Fl am~ AAS because of concentration level found •

. f:" ~·- : ' .- ~..·
• ·, •. I . j
!' .••
,, . '
,:.,. ~- ·' '
,' t'
'·
• '·,,
..
• t ' .·.} ·. ~ '
'···
'
.....
'l
'l
. ,.- •':
: ! I '
'.
~ ••
( ' ~. .
.. ,': /, J;·;;.~;:.-;,·i
.~1. ·~W f·. :• •,
,
·, .'
· . ,L·~" (\~~ . ;~;;:~,.) :.~>. >
l • ; '
, , I .' :
• • -1 '
~ Hw:11:~1;!:,,;;· "
'i';li." 1
:,....Ji; r:.\ . ,. . . ,, (,
·'~"ri•J ; -.
, .. ~ I ,
.~ '.~ '.\J#'1/].~:J;, r.t ;

·,: - \;........ 3308 East Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway . ·.
,:'1·~··M··"t, · '
>i
• '.·
~!~.;f\~··Jf~_:~;h/:;;L '_:_:
•' :\ ·1~ • '•I] Ii.:· '·• I• • .' ; , . ,
P.O. Box 12652 .
~ t; ~~\~ t(;~~ r.~:-·j~~:· I , Research Triangle Park. NC 27709 ·
jl I I' : :.it,.1,~ . . . . .
. ~·t .cOffipuChem LABORATORIES

Telephone: 919-549·8263
800-334-8525
'•1 ...
{.i:·l~L w . August 27, 1984 . '
1 ,_, ;,f
g....
!. :'. ;31~
Mr. Ernie Schroder
.;;. :;;;.Engineering
•1. Science, Inc.
· ! ;'.··; 57 Executive Park South
';ti, <~ Suite 590 SEP 0 4 1984
.''ff' .
Atlanta, GA 30329
/;':i ,' ·~: ''
f~Dear~Mr. Schroder: J.'"
ci:i~t '<'>·.~"I' .. ;
~ j;.:1;, ', "-~fil ' 1- ;
. ~J[:.Than~ you for selecting CompuChe~ Laboratories for your recent sample anal-·· . ·t
_.:i;f:ysis. We have completed the analysis that you requested and have enclosed a
W :,r. sunmary of the CompuChem® data for your review •. Additional data details are
>. •·fi· ,.,. " . .
'
]!iJ!;~: aya,i 1lable for purchase if you require them.
I
:~-•.. 1.!f!.i.~! \::~.-· .
it:.\;1r;:.,As you know, EPA has proposed detection limits for the priority pollutants in
~;:1H'~ the December 3, 1979, Federal Register, and we have reported all priority ,•
j!iJ pollutant concentrations which have exceeded these ·limits {or their equiva-
l~·1U:'· lent for solid matrices). In addition, we have permanently stored a complete
·;[. :rf) record of your data on magnetic tape. ·This includes chromatograms, mass
,'"llt~? spectra? 7alibratio~ and quality control d~ta for the organics. Therefore,
1~i;.i,;:your or1grnal data is readily available for future reference. Should you
hf~ require additional information from your data base, please contact us at
l;, (i 1/800-334-8525.
'1:' ' . . . .
In order to expedite data to you, we have forwarded the results. for all
completed analyses. If you submitted more samples than are included in the
enclosed results, the data w111 be forthcoming upon completion of our final
review.
I . 1: ''j ;i: •'
i« Your confidence in our CompuChem® service 1s appreciated. We look forward to
,L . : ; ' •,
a.;~onti ~uing association •
' t« , '
; ,.
(, , Sjncerely,
i ' .~ .. ·;;~,~~;.~ .: • ' '
' I <;/ '··' l ,

I
I -,,.:,";«.;.,
: .: Customer Ser.vice Dept •

. ,· · CompuChe~
.Enclosure:
SD-3 32297
SD-1 32301
•I.
. ·". j .
: ...
': -
i·.
.
,.
' '
r
DATA REPORT NOTICE
Volume 44 of the Federal Register. These methods.were subsequently revised and
~ · reissued in July, 1982 as publication EPA-600/4-82-057. The EPA Enviro~mental
method modifications which provide for the analysis of solid matrices •. These
l :
. ; · · rece.i ved materi a1•
, ·' The referenced methods are no longer appropriate for several of the original
••·:·.;·i·'·····
1
toxic pollutant list (40 CFR Part 401) by EPA or the determination by EPA that
;;-,:.· the referenced methods may not be optimized for certain compounds (EPA-600/4-
•.I; ·'' · 82-057) originally incorporated by the methods.
(!;, ·: : ''
t '\ : CompuChem® presents these compounds in its samp 1e data report for comp 1eteness
. F~:;/·as
many of the government compound list forms continue to display the affected
::),d;I compounds. For consistency, these compounds are reported as 11 BOL 11 or 11 Below
''f\'Y Detection Limit" as they are either not likely to exist in the sample or are ·~
,· :::· not likely to be detected by the method. Those compounds which have actually
~1l1~ bee~ deleted are listed below with the Federal Register deletion reference.
J ~~ ;:L '·~' ~
IL':/:·;·;·... ·compound Name GC/MS Fraction Federal Register Date
f'
Dichlorodifluoromethane Volatile 46FR2264 1/8/81
*Trichlorofluoromethane Volatile 46FR2264 ·l/8/81
Bis(Chloromethyl)Ether Volatile 46FR10723 2/4/81
'I'.
. "'I I
· *While this compound has been deleted, CompuChem® continues to identify

. :· and quantitate for it •
. ~.
'"
", ; ;
.. ~ <' • ' I'.;
., '' .
. i
. . .. I. ..
.. .
..CompuChem . ' LABORATORIES

. ·:; ,ji/.~]
... .11<
. '",,,
. >,!~ ~. ·.; '.
. '
:,.: ·,
REPORT OF DATA
.. ·..
",i;;
' ·"
~' ' . .. '
.. I .
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMEBER. '

~. '~' .
•
' (
SD-3 32297
SD-1 32301 ' .~. ' . . .
,,
.·. . i.
) . . .
. ,...
. :·~ .
SUBMITTED TO: .··' • •'I, •
Mr.' Ernie Schroder

· 57 Executive Park South
Suite 590
Atlanta, GA 30329 •.
' •' .
. :
. '
·II.,.
I, .
.. ..
'· ,;
'
~. ~
I .::
' .
(})(t11~IU< o.d.C!nJ~afJJ.t <}.,·

. Dit'A A. SCAMMELL . · ' ·.:1'
'~ ~'
.•' '
;
•.,.'
. TECHNICAL SPECIALIST, OPERATIONS
t ',:,I
,,
,1:.; ' :.
•1 ' ·1.,,
.. .....'.
R. L. MYERS, PH.D., PRESIDENT . ~ '.,:
'I .
., :
ROBERT E. MEIERER .. ,
DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE . ·t,';
I.
,
: .
. ,.
1' ·'
•..
...... .
.'
,
; •. z-1.
~' . ,.
,•.
' . LABORATORY CHRONICLE

' ,. .,.
.
~
Date
:{1-:.;
•
Received/Refrigerated 7-27-84
• 'f
. it .
... ";
Organics
,.-,
Extracted 8-1-84
Analyzed
2. . Acid 8-8-84
3. Base/Neutrals 8-4-84
.:
I 1
' 4. Pesticides/PCBS 8-4-84

;,•··'
Inorganics r
·«;.
(,,I,,·
i :
·~
l :.~ 1. Metals 8-14-84
': '•_,_t •·
.,. :j
" ·-''.·'; 2. Cyanide Not Requested
. •!,
.. ·,
' '
• 'j ~ '
...
·:.. : ,....
• ~ ·.' ! :
:~ ' .. '· '

.. . •! '.. .
....
}, '
i. . :
I ' ~ , COMPOUND LIST - VOLATILES ORGANICS

• .:.···I ,· • •
.. .,' .'.i . ' '
~.
DETECTION
• • • 1, • • •
,.?~;. i ,
" .' :
CONCENTRATION LIMIT
I
. ........
;
'
;•
.. (UG/KG) - (UG/KG)
- lV.· CHLOROMETHANE BDL 10

2V •. VINYL CHLORIDE · BDL 10
3V. CHLOROETHANE BDL 10
~ 4V. BROMOMETHANE BDL 10
WI' 5V. ACROLE IN BOL 100
,6V. ACRYLONITRILE .BOL 100
7V. METHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL 10
-8V •· TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BOL 10
9V. 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE. BOL 10
lOV.: 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 10 "·.
llV.~ TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10

12V .·: CHLOROFORM BDL 10
13V. 1 1,2-0ICHLOROETHANE BDL 10 .: ~
14V.: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 10

15V. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 10 ,·.
I••"
16V. BROMODICHLOROMETHANE · BDL 10 ' .

;;
17V. 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 10 :·.

' . 'f~ '
; ' ,· ''
' 1sv.: TRANS-1,3-0ICHLOROPROPENE BDL 10 .• . !'.

•'
BDL 10 '" ~ :.
19V.: TRICHLOROETHYLENE
_. . 20V. BENZENE BDL 10 ' "••: ; . I
... 21V. CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 10

· 22V.; 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE , BDL 10
23V. DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE .: . BDL 10
24V. BROMOFORM BDL 10 ·., ......
'. 25V.~ 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BOL 10 . ,.
'} ~·
26V. • 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 10
. 27V. TOLUENE BDL 10
10 ' ~'
2sv.· CHLOROBENZENE BOL
29V. :. ETHYLBENZENE BDL 10
. 30V., 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BOL 10
31V.: DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANEt BDL
.· 3?V. i'. BIS( CHLOROMETHYL)ETHERt.
~· ' ~
BOL
,.
• J ,• ~ • i •.
tsee Data Report Notice . : :' ·• j .i : !;_:.:
\ ' ~. ... '
'. i':'
' ~:
·l
. . -~ '.. '
I• l."
,' ''•." ;
' COMPOUND LIST ACID EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS

,J
'\ ; .•. ~ ;'
'
"J'
'', SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SD-3
' • ,1'
"
·.' .." ;
q·'
DETECTION*
CONCENTRATION LIMIT
. ~. ' ,;, -.
(UG/KG) (UG/KG)
•' i'
.: lA.: PHENOL BDL 500 ·'·',
' 1
11. · ;·2A. ~. 2-CHLOROPHENOL BDL 500

• ' 3A.-; 2-NITROPHENOL BDL 500
'4A.; 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BDL . 500
...
5A.: 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL I ' BDL 500 I.
•'
'~
'
-, . ,
~ i 6A.~· P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL BDL 500 " .>. '' ·:
7A •. : 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL . BDL 500 .. - ..

BA. : 2, 4-D IN ITROPHE NOL BDL 5000
9A. 4-NITROPHENOL BDL 500
lOA. 4,6-DINITRO-O-CRESOL BDL 5000
llA. PENTACHLOROPHENOL BDL 500
.
I
'
I ! ,
' ' '•. ·~· ' ;

ii . ~. '.: : ;
fl"·. ·.·: "' :.. , . I ; ,.
''
i· \.. .,. ,•
,,
.. '. '
•, ~!, ~~ ~ i ."'
:,q :,~~if,Lf;;} ,' . i ~1 • •

'·1-:·. ,.
.
"·
. :. ! . '!
•:~:·'.; BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT '
'
1'
·.~~ 1 :: *Detection limits based on processing 50g of as-received sample.

'..• . i
.. ' ' ..
· .. ··
.
I
:
. ,_ :I f' ' .
'
_. ... '.
;
. .; ~ ."
i '
' ,11' ,'· I
'• 1'
·'
' . ' '
•• 1.
~. '
i'·
COMPOUND LIST BASE-NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS '·
·;, .. :.
. "
. ·:,. • !
''.,· :·:
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SD-3 . i ( ': ·:;.,,
. :l4. COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32297 ~ ' ,' ' ~: ~ :
..•
: '·
: ·I ;. .,
. ,. .
. ·.I • . :. '• .. · .. !
; ~ ~
' \. '' ; '·. 1:; !.:',
:i. ; ' . DETECTION* ' , ' i .... :
",. CONCENTRATION LIMIT

•
"t,
J, l
(UG/KG) (UG/KG)
: .!
lB. N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE BDL ' 200 .

. _ ·. 2B. BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BOL 200
Ill' 3B. 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE' BDL 200
... .. . AB. 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE" ...... BOL 200
SB. 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 200
6B. BIS (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER BDL 200
7B •. HEXACHLOROETHANE BDL 200
SB.· N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE . BDL 200
9B •. NITROBENZENE BDL 200
lOB. ISOPHORONE BDL 200
, 118.• 8IS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BDL 200
· .. 12B. 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL 200
13B. NAPHTHALENE 8DL 200
14B. HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE BDL 200
15B. HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE BOL 200
16B. 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE BDL 200
178., DIMETHYLPHTHALATE t BDL 200
18B.: ACENAPHTHYLENE BDL '200
.... : 19B. · 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE BDL 200
20B. · ACENAPHTHENE . BDL 200
21B.r 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE BDL 200 .
' \
...
22B.: DIETHYLPHTHALATE BDL 200 : ·~ -
23B. FLUORENE BDL 200

24B. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER · BDL 200
25B. · DIPHENYLAMINE (N-NITROSO) BDL 200
268. '. 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZOBENZENE) BOL 200
27B. 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 200
28B •.. HEXACHLOROBENZENE BDL 200
' ''.
\' ·. . "~ ';,
,.,. ,- ••• •
I.
1' ~I ,·:
~ BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT

·· ' *Detection limits based on processing 50g of as-received sample •
.. .
I .• '. ..
r..
.,
'· _: :· '( .. t ).
;: • ''. • I 1,
·,
'i ~-
r
·.A~ ,
..
I ·:.
·,
' '
'
COMPOUND LIST BASE-NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS (Page Two)

'.•I
1.•
.- :. ~ .

COMPU.CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32297
DETECTION*
CONCENTRATION ·LIMIT
. . (UG/KG) (UG/KG)
• 29B •. PHENANTHRENE BDL 200
~. 30B. ANTHRACENE BDL 200 ,'.•
31B •. 'DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE BDL 200

32B. FLUORANTHEN[ · BDL 200
33B.: BENZIDINE ' BDL 200
34B. PYRENE BDL 200
: : j
35B. BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE BDL 200

· · 36B •. BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BDL ·200
.. ·37B.· 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BDL 200
38B. CHRYSENE BDL 200
39B.: BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE BDL 200
40B. :. Dl-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BDL 200
41B. BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE BDL 200
426. BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE BDL 200
43B. BENZO(A)PYRENE BDL 200
. 448. INDENO(l,2,3-C,D)PYRENE BDL 500 '
·~
..
'.. 458. • DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE . r BDL 500 '
'·,.l
• 1 . 46B •.. BENZO(G,H, I )PERYLENE BDL 500

:~· i ' ;,
~-~ .,~;~!: ·. 1 ...
·~
: ~.
.. .: .
., ...
.··· !:.,
.. •;: :,i .,'1if:'.f ; ' l ~·
' .
; \~< ··.!
' ~·.
:
'·
j';··
"~
;·.I.!
<
--: ..
.. ·..
'"';.
:
1 ''
.....
~ ' -. " ,· ::
.. ,.
...
.;·;. ·;~, ··. *BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT .
. , . Detection limits based on processing 50g of as-received sample.
•.•· I•
.. '""'• •'
' .. : ;t <1,_.
' ·i.':
'
" "·.
.' .
'
. '
't'.
:,,
~ . l .' ..: ..
~ ,:
';~ ~.....
. '.
·'':
- .. '": ..
. ·. ,;
' ,:
COMPOUND LIST PESTICIDES/PCB' S

..
,J;.1
·~ ...
COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32297 ':
·,
.·,'
:· .
..... DETECTION* ...
,.
~ ,.
CONCENTRATION LIMIT ·
... (UG/KG) (UG/KG)
· lP. ALDRIN BDL 200
. 2P. ALPHA-BHC BDL 200 ., .
. · JP. BETA-BHC BDL 200

• · 4P •. GAMMA-BHC BDL 200
' SP. DELTA-BHC BDL . 200
I 6P. ' . CHLORDANE BDL 200
7P. '· 4,4'-DDT BDL 200
BP. 4,4'-DDE · BDL 200
9P. '.4,4'-DDD BDL 200
iOP. DIELDRIN BDL 200
llP. <•ALPHA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 200
12P •. BETA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 200
13P. · ENDOSULFAN SULFATE BDL 200
14P. ENDRIN BDL 200
lSP. ENDRIN ALDEHYDE BOL 200 . I
· 16P •. HEPTACHLOR BDL 200

17P. · HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE , . BDL 200
18P~ PCB-1242 BOL 200
19P. ; PCB-1254 BDL 200 .
• 20P. PCB-1221 BOL 200 "
. 21P. PCB-1232 BDL 200
, , 22P. · PCB-1248 BDL 200
23P. · PCB-1260 BOL 200 "
. "
24P. PCB-1016 BDL 200
25P •. TOXAPHE NE BDL 200
« ,. l,
''.'·' t,
'.'.I •· ,
·•·.
~ . ··1·
. '
.•· t
'.
1
... BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
:
.
*Detection limit based on processing 50g of as-received sample •
. !·. :
.. . I•
'
,·
·!
·. ~· :·1.·
•' .•
; : .~
.,.'
i, .
.. l
t .:•
. ,.
...
"
i~ •
. . .! '
. ,
,,·,
. ' COMPOUND LIST INORGANICS PRIORITY POLLUTANTS

' ' ~!. : ' ' .'. ·.
1
i
i
.:
',.
·• ••••
... ,'
• "
! ".', ;):'1'.; SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SD-3
' ' '
~:
....
' ; .!
·;
.;
·:·:;" CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT

'.':' ~ (UG/G) . {UG/G}
. , .. ,. j
..
1 't
e ·1 • .CADMIUM
2. CHROMIUM
3. COPPER
4. LEAD *
5.6
10.0
14
BDL 0.20
0.50
1.0
0.50
. s. MERCURY 0.010 0.0020 ' ~ '
6. NICKEL 9.4 1.0

7. ZINC 48 0.20
;.•
••~ y • '
'
..... ,,
.... . . •I
: ~)
r
''
" I>
. · BDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT ' :.·' ··: ';
. ~Lead analyzed by Flame AAS because of concentration level found.

. ..... ·,
:• .
·,.,, i'' -.;
:"
,: ·:· ~· ,'.
''
,, ( :;>~ .
! .. :'
···'.
: . .. ;
:-·r;,·.',;
. ~ '. '
. .
. ' .
''
'
';··'. ., .
: ! ;
,.
,,
+.'
'·~ .
I ..
:' '.
..
"'
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: S0-1

COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32301 ,j
f 'I
Oate ' . . ~
. Received/Refrigerated 7-27-84 ~
...
' 'f ' • :•
'
' ' .. "',t
Organics
Extracted 8-1-84
Analyzed
2. Acid 8-8-84
i.
;' :,. 3. Base/Neutrals 8-6-84
"·
4. Pesticides/PCBS 8-6-84 . .'
'
: Inorgani cs ' . i~ ,i
1. Metals 8-14-84 ."

! .
' I~' :, I, 2. Cyanide Not Requested
.. .'~
. i•
: .·.· ·: 3. Phenols Not Requested
'; "<
j •• :~} .:.'·.
,,·. j:·.··t. '

. !. :'·: .•
,' ;
~. '. •,;; .
.lj
''(•... "
';f
.... . '
. ,, •i
,: ; : : 'I'; ' ~. i,
r'
'
; '
.;
'
..
\,
' .. .
· _;·,
'.f»
~
.' :, :
. '·'.
COMPOUND LIST VOLATILES ORGANICS '·
;: ~.
'
~
.
' ' ' ~ . . ~ "' ~: . . :
',;.
•,-· ·.,
,), _,!.~ '.-;. '. I
! " ; •. ,.I. :· . ; i
COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32301 .· .
:If:'.i. ·:·, \ ·
'
. ', :-.i
;':r .i
DETECTION
CONCENTRATION LIMIT
(UG/KG). (UG/KG) . : ; ; -~ 't
t'
~ . •
- ,., ,'
.j
. ;-'·
'. i '. :., ; 1V•. CHLOROMETHANE BOL 10 ·r .
i ' ' 2V • VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 10

"' :. <. 3V. CHLOROETHANE BDL
BDL
10
10
A. . 4V. . BROMOMETHANE
. . . ,·; 5V. ACROLEIN BDL 100
1
; : •• 1-. 6V. ACRYLONITR ILE BDL 100
:: '. i :.,.· 7V. ·. METHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL 10 ' .·
. ! . av. "TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10
:
1
9V. ~ 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10
·': lOV •. 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE BOL 10
..: .. · uv •. TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10 . ;
:.. ' · 12V. ·CHLOROFORM BDL 10

I • : 13V. '.i 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
. · 14V. : 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
· · i 15V. 'CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 10
. 16V •. ~ BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 10
· 17V. " 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BOL 10
. :laV. 'TRANS-1,3-0ICHLOROPROPENE BDL 10
I ..
·19V •. TRICHLOROETHYLENE BOL 10 ";.

r BDL 10
20V. . BENZENE "'
21V. "CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL . 10
•
22V •• 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 10
23V.j DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 10
~
i 24V. · BROMOFORM BDL 10 : i.. ', . ·".
1;
. •
, ir ~ ).·.·
~
.
~
; 25V. : 1, 1,2 ,2-TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10

.. · 26V. :. 1, 1, 2, 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL .: 10 ,.
"
.!
~
· 27V •. '' TOLUENE BDL 10 I
, , ·· 28V. :' CHLOROBENZENE BDL 10

BDL 10 I'. ,•
· · ·. 29V. , ETHYL BENZENE
:· \ · 30V. •. 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER .· BDL 10 ., .· .
31V. DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANEt BDL' ' "

,32V •. BIS(CHLOROMETHYL)ETHERt BDL
.·:
., J;
• 'I' '
It·,:)·:~ ' " .

'\
"' "'. ''
•~ bDL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
'
.' ...:, "•tsee Data Report Notice
'
• :·· ''
t '
<,i ': . ': .' •,

. ,··
.
,. .
/ :·
.
. : ,. .
• ~ t
•I
. '
I I, ~I. '
.1
.. '
~ ...
COMPOUND LIST ACID EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS
·'··
·. •'
... . i.
~
.··1 ': SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SD-1
'.,.;,;
. '
.'.
'·'
'"•·.
DETECTION*
•.
CONCENTRATION LIMIT
(UG/KGr (UG/kG}
: lA. ·· PHENOL BDL 500
2A.' 2-CHLOROPHENOL BDL 500 .,•
3A •. 2-N ITROPHENOL BDL 500 ';
·4A •. 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BDL 500

5A." 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL BDL 500 ..
6A •. r P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL BDL 500
7A.\ 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL BDL 500
.. '. BA.:; 2,4-DINITROPHENOL BDL 5000 "
9A. 4-NITROPHENOL BDL 500
:. lOA. 4,6-DINITRO-O-CRESOL BDL 5000
· llA. . PENTACHLOROPHENOL BDL 500
'.
'·.
'1.,
.r', ' .
I.
~ ! •. :
," j''
·;.-•.· '.' ' . " '

• ~ :: • • 4
,,..
'.. ·•· .
. •: 1 ·} . : ·: ·:
,'I'
. ~ .'
•,I , ,
'to • ~ ~
,:!•I '','
. ,:!
*Detection limits based on processing 50g of as-received sample.
.• .... :
'·,'
'•
/.',' . '. :•,
'·
.
.. '
~ , • I •
.'I
.' . I
! .-: .
' ... : i '~
. . ..
.
... .
' .:j :
. . ~·.
· ....•I •I. ; .:.t
. " ~
··,' .
!
·.. ~· , i I: •
.,, .
\. ·.
i
COMPOUND LI ST . BASE-NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS
. " .
. i . ,; :: '

.. i DETECTION*
CONCENTRATION LIMIT
'.,
(UG/KG) (UG/KG)
'·, !
'i
200
l
,\ lB •. N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE BDL
• .! .; 1~2B. BiS (2-CHLOROETHYL} ETHER BDL 200
.>:,. t;3B. :· 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ..· . BDL 200 .! '.
200
....
,:4B.·:.: 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE '.' ... BDL

BDL 200
't !.. ~ ' '' ' ~ ..
. . : , SB.'; 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE . .·
.. ,' 6B. ··.BIS ( 2-CHLOROISOPROPYL} ETHER BOL 200
.)B. HEXACHLOROETHANE . BOL 200
·. SB. N-NITROSODI-N-PROP'fLAMINE BDL 200
' ( 9B. NITROBENZENE . . BDL 200
lOB. ISOPHORONE BDL 200
llB. BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY} METHANE BOL 200
128. · 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BOL 200
13B. NAPHTHALENE BOL ·200
14B. HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE BOL 200
15B •. 1 HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE BDL 200
16B. ·2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE. BOL 200
_. 17B._ • OIMETHYLPHTHALATE ; r BOL 200
- .:.· 18B. ·~: ACENAPHTHYLENE
1
. ! . BDL 200
. 19B •. !:2,6-DINITROTOLUENE BDL 200
; . 20B •.. , ACENAPHTHENE . BDL 200
21B~ ~2,4-DINITROTOLUENE .. BDL 200
,. 22B. DIETHYLPHTHALATE I
· BDL 200
· ·: 23B. . FLUORENE BDL. 200
1
24B. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 200 . '.,-; "

. 't:
I '
25B. DI PHENYLAM INE ( N-N ITROSO) BDL 200

26B. 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZOBENZENE} BDL 200 •' ~ .\
27B. 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 200 . .,
'-.,
.. ';
..·,,, .
288 •. HEXACHLOROBENZENE BOL 200 :; '.
. .·.~ . ", . '

.. : \
I•., . BOL=BELOW DETECTION LIMIT

'".
• •'. l
. ·;:
*Detection limit based on processing 50g of as-received sample. ... '
'
.
I ,'; .~ ,
..
• • ·:' f ~: ;:
."•.,• . ..
. :~: t ', . !
'j'. '·.·.- :·:
!•
t '
' ; ~ • ' • f I ·' • I I •

':l '
' '
.; '
COMPOUND LIST BASE-NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS (Page Two) :
: ...
-,
. , .· ......
\
,'
r
t ,•
·:•
,;~. )~· ; .. . '
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SD-1 ..

,,
.
: . ·':
•. I ...
COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32301 · .. ·-.
.
.I
. ''1' . : . I,:, ·.
. ' ' !.~ . " '
'
'
... ·i... ; .
., ·~ ' .
. '\.:
. ' 4
.
., ' '. .~ .
,, . DETECTION*
·~
:,·'
·r .
CONCENTRATION LIMIT
(UG/KG) (UG/KG)
•• '
'
298. PHENANTHRENE BDL 200
. 308. ANTHRACENE BDL 200
318. DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE 80L 200
328. FLUORANTHENE BDL 200
338. BENZ IO I NE 8DL 200
348. PY RENE 8DL 200
358. BUTYL8ENZYLPHTHALATE BOL· 200
. 368. . BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 80L 200
; 378. , 3,3 1 -DICHLOR08ENZIOINE 8DL 200
388. CHRYSENE BOL 200
398. 8IS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE 8DL 200
408 •. 01-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE 8DL 200
. 418. 8ENZ0(8)FLUORANTHENE 8DL 200
428. BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE BOL 200
-·
. 438. 8ENZO(A)PYRENE BOL 200
448. INDENO(l,2,3-C,D)PYRENE 1' BOL 500
458. Dl8ENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE BDL 500
. 468. 8ENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE BDL 500
:. : '•
.•
', . i
...
.•:.
! .·""' :r
. ~ .'
•. I
.. '
8DL=8ELOW DETECTION LIMIT

,*Detection limit based on processing 50g of as-received sample •.
• . ·: ,It
•
.i:. ~
'i '
.·,,!
·'.
:.... : ·'
. ;
' ;~ : ~ : ' .
.I: COMPOUND LIST PESTICIDES/PCB'S
I ..
:,·,.·,,
~\ ·. . .
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SD-1 .I
COMPUCHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 32301 .
DETECTION*
CONCENTRATION LIMIT
I
.·;'• . .. (UG/KG) .. (UG/KG)
lP. ALDRIN BDL 200

2P.· ALPHA-BHC BDL 200
•• 3P. BETA-BHC
4P .; GAMMA-BHC
5P. DELTA-BHC
6P. CHLORDANE
i
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
200
200
200
200
200
7P.'. 4,4'-DDT
BP.· 4,4 1 -DDE BDL 200
.. 9P •. 4,4 1 -DDD
.,
BDL 200
' lOP •. DIELDRIN BDL 200
llP •. i ALPHA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 200
12P.· BETA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 200
13P •. ENDOSULFAN SULFATE BDL 200
14P •. ENDRIN ! BDL 200 ......
15P. ENDRIN ALDEHYDE BDL 200
16P.' HEPTACHLOR BDL 200
17P. HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE BDL 200
lBP. PCB-1242 r BDL 200
-- 19P. · PCB-1254 BDL 200

20P. PCB-1221 BDL 200
21P. PCB-1232 BDL 200
22P. ·: PCB-1248 BDL 200
23P. ·. PCB-1260 BDL 200
. I24P. • PCB-1016 BDL 200
;
.. , .. .i
'.•
~.
.,· '.,
25P. , TOXAPHENE BDL 200 ,';.. I •.,

•
.
j
·.t
,·.,
,' ~ :~ i' .' ' . '

"
,.i '
,. ; 1:.
Ji, . •
. :·•'. '.: ·, ~;. I ', !"
'
·,··. ( .. .1'.:'
• . ~ I

*Detection limit based on processing 50g of as-received sample.
· . . . '1.
'I,.,
;·
. ,.·:
,, ,·
"
·. ~ .
........
.
l
'
'
'
. '
'< '.) . • I,
I ' l•
I.;
t ..
, . f
; -:I .,,.;·
'; :·: I;:,', . COMPOUND LI ST INORGANICS PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
l1 ~ .. - •. r

CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT

(UG/G) (UG/G)
i:~CADMIUM, TOTAL 0.30 0.020

2. CHROMIUM, TOTAL 6.8 0.50 ' L ; :
3. COPPER, TOTAL 5.7 1.0

4. LEAD, TOTAL * 18 0.50
5. MERCURY, TOTAL 0.0084 0.0020
. ~ 6. NICKEL, TOTAL 6.5 1.0
7. ZINC, TOTAL 40 0.20
··.·,::.
, I
!'•<.
·...•
'. ~ ·.'
)·"·.
"
l
t
..
~
•,)
. .
. ·;
. ; -:·
."
,, *Lead analyzed by flame AAS because of concentration level found •

• •U. • . •;
.: . :/.~::.: ·~:t
! ,, ' 1'
'!,
': ;,,l'l
~ .~).: (
"l;.t ' I . .,·'
'. 1
i•1..
f' .:...
I!· i
'i. .( ... :,:~ 1:. t· ," .···
'.::. ··.,;.· . :
t, • .• : ~ . :. I • . ~
. !. :
·, .:
. !. , . j
.. '',: .
. ~·
"'
"
. I ( ·, ~·
'''
i '
;.',.····· .. ·,I
6) GROUNDWATER DATA
~ ~~LABORATORY ENVIRONMENTAL and INDUSTRIAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES
'
ir
November 1, 1984
!' "
• ' .::,'\
1.:. -l,
,; t
J: \\ Mr. Rocoo Palazolo
. .Engineering Sciences
57 Executive Park S.
~·; Atlanta, Georgia '30329
I~ ~J
' Re: Sample results for CM-1A, CM-1B, CM-2,
CM-3, CM-4, CM-5, & CM-6.
Very truly yours,

I
H2M CORPORATION
.Stanley c.·r.ewis
Operations Manager - Laboratory
·SCL/jes
J Enclosure
J
J ,' ·~,.--
\.,.otPttv~I: , _
J
\
. J<. . ~ "'~rt
.f,'J['I~\ <~'O~~
• ris ·· • .::·
575 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD, MELVILLE, N.Y.11747 • 516·694·3040 ~~~~~~q.·:,.//
~~~
J Established In 1956 Member ACIL
i'll!o
i n.·; ·;.r .'.;:

i
:~ '
t· . ·.
,,.
~ . ,", fiF"
,,
\ ··RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
of Recra Research, ~nc
l
1 ...
~: f < '
>1
Mr. Stan Lewis

H2M
''
575 Broadhallow Road
1• Melville, NY 11747
· .. ~ Re: Analytical Results

•!!t ' : .~ "
Dear Mr. Lewis:
... 'h!
... ' " Please find enclosed results of the analyses of the samples
received at our laboratories on July 30 and August 1, 1984.
I
'
"" •. ..
... "
i·! to
If you have any questions concerning these data, do not hesitate
contact our Customer Service Representative at (716) 692-7620.
,, ,.,,.,
' Sincerely,
; I,
1' '
"
; RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
n ,~-·)
"'"T'r'\j.. 4 , ..,,. ~, -L;:;;. , ,. . ;>'"'~- ·

1 ~
<
James A. Ploscyca
Laboratory Manager
( _)
1
, BJK/JAP/mdc/jhs
Enclosure ;. . ~
, '~
.·.
•
.
,, I.D. #84-746
'·'I•
84-746 A
,
84-746 B
"
'~- :. . ·,.. ( "
'~- ..
1
,
'
,
''•, .o'
.' ··; "l
4248 Ridge Lea Aooo, Amherst, New York 14226 Sales (716) 836-6200
Telephone Laboratory (716) 692-7620
:3',
.. .
~.
RECRA ENVIRONME TAL LABORATORIES
I.. · , Division of Recra
l"
L
1-
ANALYTICAL
: ''
'
;
.
REPORT
..
J
•
I
~
J .'
J Sales (716) 838-6200

Telephone Laboratory(716) 692·7620
~- RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
· Division of Recra Research, Inc.
,.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
,;:. H2M
I ·,r ·-
........\. l
.i '
' . PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES
J~,.,'·I
' . ,j ~t,
'• ;..
'
~-·
,.
,.
r Prepared For:
H2M
r:· ..
575 Broadhallow Road
"~ ..' Melville, NY 11747
.....
r :·•·
' '
.
Prepared By:
Recra.Environmental Laboratories
r . '
4248 Ridge Lea Road
Amherst, NY 14226
r Report Date:
·t· August 24, 1984
i~
11 '
'r
t\,
1,· ,.
4:>4R Ricim~ IP.a Roa.1 Amhi>rsl Ni>w York 14??fl 171 hi A'UH\ ?<'l()
•~ I
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1 '
H2M
...IN PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES
I
.. Report Date: 8/24/84
~··
INTRO DU CT ION:
I
..... On July 30, and August 1, 1984 samples were received at Recra Environmental
Laboratories. A request was made by H2M to have the samples analyzed for selected
fractions of the Environmental Protection Agency decreed priority pollutants,
total organic halide, and to determine the pH.
' This report will address the results of those analyses.

'f.
..
METHODS:
Priority pollutant analyses were conducted according to Environmental

l
.Protection Agency (EPA) methodologies.
r Organic priority pollutants were analyzed by Gas Chromatography /Mass
r
1 'Spectrometry (GC/MS).
l•
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
'·Analysis for total organic halide was subcontracted. Sample FT-1 for
r :·
, ..
,·'
.total organic halide was not received.
1: .· "· Total organic halide values reported as "less than" (<) indicate the
,working detection limit for the given sample and/or parameter.
!\:::, Sample OW-2 was analyzed in duplicate for the base neutral compounds but
no positive values resulted.
Compounds reported as ND are "not detected". Compounds reported as BDL
·, are confirmed as being present in the sample at a level "below detection limit",
: ·and are not subject to reliable quantitation.
Respectfully Submitted,
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

~j~)l'
. -o-- - - - -
. ii
/ '. ANALYTICAL RESULTS
" .·
H2M
l J(
BASE/NEUTRALS
·"'ll
.. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
II . .. . DETECT\ON '
T LIMIT
1..CCHPOUND (110 fl) OW-l OW-lB OW-2
ND ND ND
.
.~1cenaphthene 1. 9
J
I _acenaohthylene 3.5 ND ND ND
I
anthracene 1. 9 ND I ND ND
l
{benzidine 44 ND ND ND
'~enzo(e)anthracene 7.8 ND ND I ND
{benzo (a)pyrene I 2.5 ND ND ! ND
benzo(b)fluoranthene I 4.8 ND ND I
I ND
dbenzo(g, h, i)pervlene 4.1 ND ND .i ND
~benzo(k)fluoranthene 2.5 ND ND !
I
ND
bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 5.3 ND ND i
I ND
I ND
J bie(2-chloroethvl)ether 5.7 ND ND I
;
:Jb!s(2-chloroisooropyl)ether 5.7 ND ND ND
'
j bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthala te I 2.5 ND
!
I ND ND
~4-bromoehenylphenvlether
I
1. 9 ND ND ND
•
I
butylben:~vlohthalate i 2. 5r. ND I
ND ND
] 2-c h~?E.£!13 ph tha lene 1. 9 ND '
I
I
ND ND
-
I
4-chl·:>rophenvlohenvlether 4.2 ND ND ND
I '
j chrvsene 2.5 ND I
:
ND ND
I
-J ..
I
dihenzo(a. h)anthracene
2-i:i i ch 1nrobenzene
i I
I
2.5
1. 9
ND
ND
l
j
ND
ND
ND
ND
I
l
1, 3-d ichlorobenzene I 1. 9 ND I
; ND ND
I 1.4-dichlorobenzene I 4.4 ND '
I
I ND ND
3.3'-dlchlorobenzidine
i 16.5 ND ND ND
. diethvl~hthnlate 22 ND : ND ND
dimethvlohthalate 1.6 ND ND ND
--~-~-~ -
d l-n-buty luhthalate 2.5 ND ND ND

(Continued)
Page 2 of 2
J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
I H2M
I PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES

t· .,.
BASE/NEUTRALS
~~
DETECTION
.... LIM"IT
.. COMPOUND (µg/l)
. OW-1 OW-lB OW-2
..
,
i. 2,6-dinitrotoluene 1.9 ND ND ND
2,4-dinitrotoluene 5.7 ND i ND ND
!""di-n-octvlphthalate 2.5 ND !
i
ND ND
'i,2-diphenvlhydrazine 25 ND ' ND ND
I
r""'f luoranthene 2.2 ND I
ND ND
-fluorene 1. 9 ND I ND ND
1. 9 ND ND I ND
J ..hexachlorobenzene ' I
!
..Jlexachlorobutadiene 0.9 ND ND II ND
I
hexachlorocyclopentadiene 25 ND ND I
I ND
r
i
,_
hexAchloroethane
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1. 6
3. 7
ND
ND
I
I
ND
ND
I
!
!
ND
ND
I
r... I I
isophorone 2.2 ND ND ! ND I
rnaphthalene 1. 6 ND ' ND ND I
r l
''nitrobenzene 1. 9
25
f'
,
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,...N-nitrosodimethylamine
r •N-ni trosodi·n-propy lamine
1,_.N-nitrosodiphenylamine
25
1. 9
ND
ND
ND
ND I
ND
ND
I
,,. , phenant hrene
. 5.4 ND ND ND I
•~pvrene · 1.9 ND ND ND
I 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 1. 9 ND ND ND
~DlTIONAL SAHPLE INFORMATION

Sample Date 7/2/84 ! 7/3/84 I
I 7/3/84 I
Extraction Date 7/31/84 I' aj22/84 1 7/31/84
I~
Analvsis Date 8/14/84 ' 8/23/84 I 8/15/84
Internal Standard - Level 20 1ig/l ! 20 pg/l I 20 pg/l I
deuterated phenanthrene - Recovery 102% 82% i 130%
1; Surrogate Standard (SS3) - Level 120 µg/l 120 pg/1 : 120 µg/l
decafluorobiphenyl - Recovery
Ii. Surrogate 54% 62% 65%
J
•'
Standard (SS4) - Level
• 2-fluorobiphenyl - Rec;.overy
100 µg/l
61% ...
100 µg/1
70% i
l 00 µg/l
63%
~~''. :,r :'.: FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL

'LlC>. '.
~
Page 1 of 2
,;
•
... '
~-
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
. i '
! .,
H2M
., GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
~ PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES
f~ BASE/NEUTRALS
fOMPOU~D
cenaphthene
' .
DETECTiON
LIMIT
(u!:!ll)
I. 9
OW-3
ND
OW-4
ND
I
I
I
OW-5
ND
3.5 ND ND I ND
.,.nthracene 1. 9 ND ND ND
i
benzidine 44 ND I ND ND
r ""
.l enzo(a)anthracene 7.8 ND i ND ND
f'benzo(a)ovrene 2.5 ND I
I
ND ND
. ~enzo(b)fluoranthene 4.8 ND I ND ND
.
"enzo(g, h, i)oervlene 4.1 ND I ND ND
I. ''enzo (k) f luoranthene 2.5 ND II ND ND
'~is (2-chloroethoxv)methane 5.3 ND ND ND
I
his(2-chloroethvl)ether 5.7 ND ND ND
rJJis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether i
5.7 ND I ND ND
JJ bis(2-ethvlhexyl)phthalate 2.5 ND ND ND
1
1 /-brornophenvlohenvlether 1. 9 - ND ! ND ND
'
fbutvlbenzvlphthalate 2.5 ND ND ND
l-chloronaphthalene 1. 9 ND ND ND
Ji-chlorophenvlohenvlether 4.2 ND ' ND ND
J ']hrvsene · · 2.5 ND ND ND
j.J1benzo(a. h)anthracene 2.5 ND ND ND
J )" 2-dic~lorobenzene 1. 9 ND ND ND
3-dichlo~obenzene ND ND
../ 1• 4-d 1. 9 ND
1
•• ,.
.
ic hlorobenzene 4.4 ND ND ND
:J. 3' -dichlorobenzidine 16.5 ND ND ND
~ diethvlohthalate 22 ND ND ND
I]ime thvloh,tha late 1. 6 ND ND ND
J di-n-butvlohthalate 2.5 ND ND ND
(Continued)
I
Page 2 of 2
J
•
\
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
H2M
BASE/NEUTRALS
( ,' . DETECTION
I
I COM~Otm~'
I . 2,6-dinitrotoluene
LIMIT
(µg/l) OW-3 OW-4 OW-5
1. 9 ND ND ND
112,4-dinitrotoluene 5.7 ND I ND ND
;-:a
1 di-n-octylphthalate 2.5 ND I ND I ND
i
f 1,2-diphenylhydrazine 25 ND ND I ND
F
fluoranthene 2.2 ND ND ' ND
j
f fluorene 1. 9 ND ND I ND
~J hexachlorobenzene 1. 9 ND ND I ND
J- hexachlorobutadiene 0.9 ND ND ND
25 ND . ND ND
;T hexachlorocvclopentadiene
hexachloroethane 1. 6 ND : ND ND
t~ indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 3.7 ND ND ND
~
isophorone 2.2 ND ND ND
r· naphthalene 1.6 ND ND ND
"'!
nitrobenzene 1. 9 ND ND ND
25 ND ND ND
f' N-nitrosodimethylamine
""l N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine 25 ND ND ND
N-nitrosodiphenylamine 1. 9 ND ND ND
f' ND ND ND
- phenanthrene 5.4
1. 9 ND ND ND
· pvrene
.f 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 1. 9 ND ND - ND
- ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATION

i . Sample Date 7/2/84 7/3/84 7 /10/84
Extraction Date 7/31/84 7/31/84 7/31/84
Analysis Date 8/15/84 8/15/84 8/15/84
1 i Internal Standard - Level 20 µg/l 20 µgll 20 µg/l
deuterated phenanthrene - Recovery 110% 130% 135%
... Surrogate Standard (SS3) - Level 120 µg/l 120 µg/l 120 µg/l
decaf luorobiphenvl - Recoverv 65% 58% 59%
J • Surrogate Standard 100 pg/l 100 µg/l lUU µg/l
(SS4) - Level
.,. 2-fluorobiphenyl - Recoverv 56% .... 47% 4::>7.
-
Jifv~
•
~~··
'j .'. '
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 1~
... DAT f/2
~llECRA ENVIRONMFNTAI I .6Rf'IDATnD1cc
.. - ..
1 dl",t: .I U.L L
~ '' .'.
'ANALYTICAL RESULTS
H2M
r. PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES
r
... -l
BASE/NEUTRAI, S
I SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
'COMPO~~D
DETECTiON
OSTERMAN '
'
LIMIT
fu1dl) OW-6 WELL I
FT-1
'acenao hthene 1. 9 ND ND ND
I
I
acenaphthvlene 3.5 ND ND ND
i
'
L• anthracene 1. 9 ND I
I
ND ND
\P benzidine '" 44 ND I
ND ND
_ benzo(a)anthracene 7.8 ND i ND ND
[I.... benzo (a) ovrene 2.5 ND I ND ND
benzo(b)fluoranthene 4.8 NO : ND ND
1
flJ.- benzo (g. h, i)pervlene 4.1 ND : NO ND
I benzo(k)fluoranthene 2.5 ND ! ND ND
ii bis (2-chloroethoxv)methane 5.3 ND '
I
i
ND ND
~ bis (2-ch lo roe thv 1) ether 5.7 ND ,
I
ND ND
I
bis(2-chloroisoproovl)ether 5.7 ND ND ND
bis(2-ethvlhexvl)ohthalate 2.5 ND
' ND ND
~ 4-br omoohen v lohenv let her 1. 9,..... ND : ND ND
butylbenzvlohthalate 2.5 ND ND ND
- : ND ND
2-chloronaphthalene 1. 9 ND
4-chlo'r~ohenylphenvlether 4.2 ND ND ND
- chrysene .: 2.5 ND ND ND
'
dibenzo(a.h)anthracene 2.5 ND ND ND
•
'•·
1 2 2-dichlorobenzene 1. 9 ND ND ND
I 1 2 3-dichlorobenzene 1.9 ND ND ND
1
-· 1.4-dichlorobenzene 4.4 ND ND ND
41 3.3'-dichlorobenzidine 16.5 ND ND ND
-
~ diethvlohthalate
dimethvlohthalate
22
1. 6
ND
ND
ND
ND NP
ND
l.. di-n-butvlohthalate 2.5 ND ND ND

(Continued)
t'age L. ot L.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
H2M
BASE/NEUTRALS
.. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
DETECTION
tr COMPOUND
LIM'IT
(110/l) OW-6
OSTERMAN
WELL FT-1
~
~- 2, 6-dinitrotoluene 1.9 ND ND I ND
fl
h 2,4-dinitrotoluene 5.7 ND ND ND
~
di-n-octvlphthalate 2.5 ND
'
ND ! ND
J. l,~-diphenylhydrazine 25 ND ' ND ! ND
fluoranthene 2.2 ND ND I ND
Ij
fl: fluorene 1. 9 ND ND I ND
~· hexachlorobenzene 1. 9 ND ' ND I ND
I
II' he~rnchlorobutadiene 0.9 ND ND l ND
:
J. hexachlorocyclopentadiene 25 ND ND : ND
I
_ hexachloroethane 1.6 ND ND I ND
- indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 3.7 ND ND ND
isophorone 2.2 ND ND I ND
in... naphthalene 1.6 ND ND ND
I , nitrobenzene 1. 9 ND ND ND
if
•J I
N-nitrosodimethylamine 251' ND ND ND
,. 25 ND ND ND
N-nitrosodi-n-propvlamine
1. 9 ND ND ND
If.. N-nitrosodiphenylamine
phenanthrene 5.4 ND ND ND
1. 9 ND ND ND
~- pvrene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 1. 9 ND ND ND
: ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATION
l1 Sample Date 7/10/84 7 /11184 I 7/3/84
"' Extraction Date 7/31/84 7/31784 I 7 /31/84
Analysis Date 8/15/84 8/15/84 I
8/15/84
-
tr "
deuterated phenanthrene - Recovery
20 µg/l
130%
20 µg/l
78%
'
!
I
20 µg/l
135%
Surrogate Standard (SS3) - Level 120 µg/l 120 pg/l : 120 µg/l
4- decafluorobiEhenil - Recoveri · 71% 50% i 64%
u.. Surrogate Standard (SS4) - Level 100 pg/l 100 pg/I I
100 pg/l
2-fluorobiphenyl - Recoverv 63% v 52% 55%
..J - '
~ '~~;, " FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES .fdw_~9&

n :1rrn ~ rtitnr< f"'lp 1 ·~r;._ITl\f f An,....,...._,,..,....._,_..,.
DATE d~Y. .
Page 1 of 2
r·~
. " ANALYTICAL RESULTS
t H2M
~- PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES
lr·- VOLATILES
Report Date:
8/24/84
Jr·- COMPOUND
' ... DETECTION
LIMIT
(µg/l) OW-1 OW-lB
'
I OW-2
!
Jr acrolein 400 ND ND i ND
••- acrylonitrile
t- 400 ND ND ND
benzene 4.4 ND ND ND .
• .. bromodichloromethane 2.2 ND ND ND
! - bromoform 4.7 ND ND ND
q
~
"
bromomethane 10 ND I ND ND
I
carbon tetrachloride 2.8 ND i ND ND
; .-
! chlorobenzene 6.0 ND ! ND ND
-
~ chloroethane 10 ND
i
I ND ND
. 2-chloroethvlvinvl ether 10 ND I ND ND
'
I
i
chloroform 1. 6 ND ND ND
fr' chloromethane 10 ND I ND ND
if dibromochloromethane 3.1 ND I
I ND ND
~ 1,1-dichloroethane 4. 7· ND I ND ND
'
•- 1,2-dichloroethane 2.8 ND ND ND
.
l _ l, 1-dichloroethylene
'"'I'll
trans-1,2-dichloroethvlene
1,2-dichloropropane
2.8
1. 6
6.0
ND
ND
ND
:
~
!
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND '
k I
1,3-dichloropropene
ethvlbenzene
5.0 ND : ND ND
7.2 ND ND ND
methylene chloride 2.8 ND ND ND
I
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 6.9 ND ND ND
...
I
......
tetrachloroethylene 4.1 ND : ND ND
(Continued):
f.
' Page 2 of 2
i~· 11.
!I'. ANALYTICAL RESULTS
r· H2M
r
"
f Report Date: 8/24/84
;
r VOLATILES
fL SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
DETECTION
!
. LIMIT
tcoMPOUND (u1!/l) OW-1 OW-lB OW-2
!.
I toluene 6.0 ND ND ND
If 1.1.1-trichloroethane
.i.,
3.8 ND c- BDL l
~
..
ND
I 1 2 1 1 2-trichloroethane 5.0 ND ND ND
.!
trichloroethylene 1. 9 ND ND ND
L
I .. vinyl chloride 10 ND ND I
ND
L.
JI
,
:• ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATION
Sam le Date
1 Anal sis Date

, Internal Standard - Level
· 'bromochloromethane - Recover
120/~ 96%
1 40 1 40 1
2-bromo-1-chloro ro ane - Recover 110% 96%
Internal Standard - Level 1 40 J 1 40 1
1 4-dichlorobutane - Recover 120% 100%
)
~
. '
• ( ' ·~ ' f
' '
J FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES __ _·~rf,,._j_,_~-"---.1.itJ..,...-...tfc_~-·--------

_ith 1
.J
"U1__
DATE _£4--V-'-'-Y;j_~f+------
)
J
CAA ENVIRONMENTAL LABO RA TORIES

Page 1 of 2
I j
,, '" ANALYTICAL RESULTS

j ".
H2M
. : GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
t-.'
'
,,
I~
,. Report Date: 8/24/84
VOLATILES
DETECTION . I
LIMIT
-COMPOUND (ue:/1) OW-3 OW-4 OW-5
•• acrolein 400 ND ND ND
·-acrylonitrile 400 ND ND I ND
•benzene 4.4 ND ND ND
2.2 ND ND II ND
~bromodichloromethane
tl . bromoform 4.7 ND ND ' ND
i
bromomethane 10 ND ND I ND
i~
~-carbon tetrachloride 2.8 ND ND ND
[ chlorobenzene 6.0 ND ND ND
I chloroethane 10 ND ND ND
"". 2-chloroethvlvinyl ether 10 ND I ND I ND
,'·· chloroform 1. 6 ND ND ND
I
i.- chloromethane 10 ND i ND I ND
1. dibromochloromethane I .
3.1 ND ND : ND
L.. 1,1-dichloroethane 4.7· ND
I
i ND
!
ND
I
I_ 1,2-dichloroethane 2.8 ND
j
I ND
.
I ND
I
~ 1,1-dichloroethvlene 2.8 ND i' ND i ND
~. trans-I', 2-dichloroethvlene
I
1. 6 ND ND i ND
'
;
.J 1, 2-dichloropropane 6.0 ND ND ND
r' 1,3-dichloropropene 5.0 ND i
ND ND
I.
! ethylbenzene 7.2 ND i ND ND
ft methylene chloride ' 2. 8 ND ND ND
L, l,l,2,2-tetrachloroethane 6.9 ND ND ND
.J tetrachloroethvlene 4.1 ND .
'
ND ND
•
(Continued)
,,
' '
"
CRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
r
I
i
~ •
ANALYTICAL RESULTS .
Page 2 of 2
r
II
H2M
r
,.
. PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES

r VOLATILES
:
DETEC'fION
~ ~OMPOU~D LIMIT
(u!!/l) OW-3 OW-4 OW-5
i!J1 toluene 6.0 ND ND ND
J.l 1, l. l-trichloroethane 3.8 ND ND ND
~ 1.1.2-trichloroethane 5.0 ND ND ND
trichloroethvlene 1. 9 ND ND ND
vinyl chloride 10 ND ND ND
rADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATION
4f Sample Date 7 /2/84 7/3/84 7/10/84
JI Anal vs is Date 8/13/84 8/13/84 8/10/84
1
Internal Standard - Level 40 µe/l 40 µg:/l 40 µg/l
I
~ bromochloromethane - Recoverv 120% 97% 99%
Internal Standard - Level 40 µg/l 40 µg/l 40 µg/l
2-bromo-1-chloropropane - Recovery 130% 97% 90%
Internal Standard - Level 40 µg/l 40 pg/l 40 µg/l
(
i 1,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery 130% 1007. 85%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES -!'-.&t~ch" '-"'~:. .; ;U=- t,<Y:l_.'~'-='- -"-=J,. . '1u.'t~t-"-:l. .:. ~-(,('- .
-------
DATE _,5;6c.....:::.:_,£,f-+--JL.¢;-J__l _ _
'.
'. ;!
I-
]. (.
Page l of 2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
H2M
;·
'
.... '"
i

; . '.
VOLATILES
F
I ...
1 COHPOUND
DETECTION
LIMIT
(u2/l)
'
OW-6
OSTERMAN
WELL FT-1
ft'acrolein ' 400 ND ND ND
I-
1 acrv 1on1• tr1
•le 400 ND ND ND
j,-benzene 4.4 ND ND ND
l
I ·brornodichloromethane 2.2 ND ND ND
t !
~bromoform · 4.7 ND ND ND
'
!,~bromomethane
I
10 ND
I
i
ND ND
,.
!-carbon tetrachloride
I chlorobenzene
2.8
6.0
ND
ND
i
I
.
ND
ND
I
ND
ND
r= chloroethane 10 ND I ND ND
t!.2-chloroethvlvinvl ether 10 ND ND 1. ND
i
, ..... chlorofor:n 1. 6 ND
'
t ND '
I ND
~ chloromethane
I
10 ND i ND ND
I
' dibromcchloromethane 3.1 ND I ND ; ND
&Ir l, 1-dichlo'roethane 4. 7 " ND
j
ND ;
ND
I
1- 1,' 2~dichloroethane 2.8 ND I ND ND
II l, 1-:-d ichloroethvlene 2.8 ND ! ND
•
' ND
1
1 trans-1, 2-dichloroethylene 1. 6 ND ND ND
' ' . "
l1f 1, 2-dichl~ropropane 6.0 ND ND ND
1,3-dichloropropene s.o ND ND
. ND
I
·~ ethvlbenz.ene · 7.2 ND ND ND
I
Tilt!thylef!~- chloride 2.8 r ·~
ls 111::111 ND ND
"-··--
I l,1,2;·2~,tat~achloroethane 6.9 ND ND ND
I• tetra.:hloroethvlene 4. 1 ND ' ND ND '
(Continued)
t i. !
:•. .. .
'
,.
!'.;:
Page 2 of 2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
H2M
I PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES
I~ VOLATILES
.... DETECTION - .
i
LIMIT OSTERMAN
~OMPOUND (11g/l) OW-6 WELL FT-1
/ll'toluene 6.0 ND ~ BDL ~ ND
'-~ J
'4,1,1-trichloroethane 3.8 ND ND ND
~,1.2-trichloroethane 5.0 ND ND ND
,11
, trichloroethylene
vinyl chloride

1. 9
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Arialvsis Date
""Internal Standard - Level
fr-bromochloromethane - Recover
1f1Internal Standard - Level
-2-bromo-l-chloro ro ane - Recover
1 4-dichlorobutane - Recover
-
-
J'
,..
-i
]-
,~
:~
'
)
ANALYTICAL RESULTS •j
H2M
Report Date: 8/24/84 ; I
PARAMETER (UNITS OF MEASURE)
SAMPLE
.
IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE DATE TOTAL ORGANIC HALIDE (mg/l)
J OW-1 7/2/84 <0.02
OW-lB 7/3/84 <0.02
L. l
OW-2
OW-3
7/3/84
7/2/84
0.04.
0.04
I
I
I I
. I OW-4 7/3/84 0.09
l-- j ow-s 7/10/84 <0.02
OW-6 7/10/84 0 .12.
Osterman Well 7/11/84 0.04
'
f .
r
t'
~·
~ ' \ ···,'FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES &t1¥)~,,h

.~ ', , ' DATE e[w/tf-
L.. l.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
L. H2M
r· ... Report Date: 8/24/84
r-·.... PARAMETER (UNITS OF MEASURE) l'
I
r-·- >,
. J.
SAMPLE
· IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE DATE pH (STANDARD UNITS)
OW-1 7/2/84 8.05
r- .....
'.
OW-lB
j
7/3/84 8.14
I
!
i
OW-2 : 7/3/84 8 .12 I
f q
....
OW-3 i 7/2/84 I 8.11 .I
OW-4 7/3/84 8.14
r-....
'.!'
OW-5 7/10/84 8.16
OW-6 7/10/84 8.07
FT-1 6.45
1-
- Osterman Well 8.20
1-... .
r--
r: r
f .. i
: . . i.
f
l"
I ''
.,,. ,
'1 ~r ·,,
,.:.· ,r: '\
'
.,
1
~.
c ~·:
; .
j
DATE J/J..'f: ?tf-
~--0.~,_o_~~~~~~
...;
{' ·t
r ..'
f
'
~p~·
~ lA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
'"
T r lln' -, ; ,..
\r.
, ~
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
....
,,
l •
~1
&,r ....1
I"
H2M
~1
QUALITY CONTROL
IJ.
.
..
,
L..
BASE NEUTRAL RECOVERY ANALYSIS OF
COMPOUND
., METHOD BLANK
ng OF ' ng
Report Date:
%
8/24/84
·I IDENTIFICATION SPIKE RECOVERED RECOVERY I

·'··~
1,3-dichlorobenzene 50 25 50
di-n-octylphthalate 50 36 72
,,
I
fluoranthene' - 50 20 40
naphthalene 50 i 31 62
I
i nitrobenzene 50 31 I 62
~-~~

r'! Extraction Date 7/31/84
Analysis Date 8/14/84
~· .. Internal Standard (IS) - Level 20 µg/l
. " deuterated phenanthrene - Recovery.~~~~~~1_4_0_%~~~~--'
:J
,.
Decafluorobiphenyl - Recovery
120 µg/l
61%
...
·;,:"
Surrogate Standard (SS4) - Level 100 µg/l
2-fluorobiphenyl Recovery 50%
I ...
.(,
rl .
""'""
' 'l ·,
, ...
r
. t. '~ : f ~
ij ~~ ;1;.1 :;·.·
"'···
.: ,·_}).
... .,.
}
r ' ,''
rl I
.
\
·.·:, ..; ..
. i
... ANALYTICAL RESULTS
H2M
QUALITY CONTROL ' '
Report Date: 8/24/84 :
VOLATILE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OF

• SAMPLE OW-3
COMPOUND ng OF ng %
IDENTIFICATION SPIKE RECOVERED RECOVERY
carbon tetrachloride 200 120 60
chlorobenzene 200 i 160 80
chloroethyl vinyl ether 200 I 180 I 90
i
I
chloroform 200 i 160 80
I i
dibromochloromethane 200 : 110 : SS l
1,1-dichloroethane 200 180 I

90 I
l
1,1-dichloroethylene 200 170

'
I
8S I
1,2-dichloropropane 200 170 8S l
I
l I
methylene chloride ' 200 140 i 70 I
- '
i tetrachloroethylene 200 '
180 '
I
' 80
I
1,1,2-trichloroethane 200 170 8S
1,, trichloroethylene 200 160 80
I·~ 1'
I

~ ;~ ·( .;~:' Sample Date 7/2/84
1... ,. ·. Analysis Date 8/13/84
Internal Standard - Level 40 11g/l
Bromochloromethane - Recovery 120%
j_ Internal Standard - Level
2-bromo-1-chloropropane - Recovery
I-
,1 _____ 4_0_11g/ 1
130%
. Internal Standard Level 40 11g/l
1,4-dichlrobutane - Recovery I
130%
l- .. ~ '• .
J
I
J~
•/
~~-fl.-·~'£1,~l~J_t~(~·- - - - -
'' .
- ' '
J :, ··: FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
~ATE JJl--+i+-'lr.__.ff---._ __
~'.',
~RA ENVIRONM~NTAL LABORATORIES
'
PROJ. NO.
\'330t; - PROJECT NAME
~~rend c._~
.
( ~jlVru'~ ~~iirifi('.)Y\ \
.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
/J ~
~
'.;
.
(:().3, NO. • .::,:. , • ·
SAMPLERS: IS•11t11.,,.I ~ .; OF '•
·AJUJ-L;'f..l.· gaumata£ coN· IA~ ·.:$ · REMARKS

.: • \ \...) TAINEAS ~ . ,J
STA.NO, DA.Tl TIMI 5
1 : STATION LOCATION ..). ' ~
.. u "....!' ~
OW-1!1 ill~ JE:.. X \\.cl v~ \i)\01~""[J hl\./ ~ 3 i 3 I I 1" l'l'Y'lle.r- .,-
/
..,,.. ~ 1~aJ.,.;h ./ 1 PA n.rW ~PC..+ ,~ nm>o.:.l w~
I i 'In ke> I tt!{)() i~ ~ i Mrt ,j,
.~ lnfk J ~s. bro}c/\ ) . -
• rn~t.ll~ kv m )e ("ff)..f}A I ,v\ () •
,1
i I I - ) l \
I I
j I )
I : !
• • t
I '
I I
I I t
: !
I I I !
I . !
I
I
• I f ~- -.
· I I ·
I I I I
I l : I I I
•. ,;~·v,,..~..-· ,~;.. r;;;,/. ~f::J H ·;;~~:~::~:ir· 1,_2,1";;Ft~, ·u~=i ~

£1.,.;,h,~ " Om I Tiolw ••!''"' byo ,.,,..,~•• RoUnqu;ohod by: ''''"'~" Do" I Timo ,'A"''"' by: tsf'~,-~1
is.,..,,.,,,,
I I
R1linqui1h1d by:
-
. l
0111 /Time Rcc1ind far L1bar11ary by:
/liftt•l11•d
!
I
I
D11e /Time
•
I
'Remark&
I
I .. ..
•·
_, -··
_. ..
--·;ti-
Dt11•11Nll•1t: Orlpnel An•-"''•• 1111,.,...ni; C.11r •• c: ..........., I•••d •••u '
I· ._-:· :· ·:t......:..
·,....;""' -_-r.r ~ - , .. ·• . -;,,...

·.::-~ .: ~ -~ ~:. -
l 1
~ ....
rAOJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
\"~3()~-
003 •·JrKkP~c;~ (~:nn~~Ht,~l ~
HO.
/.
•
SAMPLERS: IS•1nu11r1I ' '-,J
Of
..
'Mu..~J.(~, :~:P'1.,,:_/"J CON•
. REMARKS
' '
.: •< l
../
TAINE AS
\" J,: .
STA.NO. DATE TIMI
l
8 \)
ri: IT A TION 1.0CA TION
""" ~
'""'""
' ,
('
f"lll-.::l ~ \Oo.J"
•v "
1:7"'
x lJu<:.~ PA l l'1 nr...HJ\) IJ

/
P
I
>JY. "'fi .3 I 3 I I I ·\ n c:i rnlo v- -rrr
I
! I
.
.
.I I
I
'
'
I
l l! !
I
I
I
.
I I
.
'I t
I !
I I
I
!
. I ' I I
. . •
!
.,- I
1 i
l •I I I
I
Relinqui&hed by: ISif"lll111'9/ 0111 I Time ! Ru: ived by: 1s;~l1111fl 7- <;
t I
R1linquilh1d by: 1Sir11uu1d

I
'I 0111 /Timi Rrc:rlnd by: /s;,..,.,.,,.,J
~;,·I(\./}~
/ , _M,. j'J~ ILl-f" 11~ 11;,,.,,.,,.,
~I s~~\~""~u 11 ..i1;s1 I.i-.o~ ,Ud~L
~ .... , . ,. . . >,. , -- -
·-
R•l"quithid b • s;,,,.,.,,., 011e /Tim1 Rt1 1ived by: R1linqui1h1d by: 1s.,,..,.,,,, . 0111 /Time 'fhc:rlnd by: 1s1,.;;,.,,.,,
I
u.,..,..,,.,
I
I I
Relinqui1hed by: 0111 /Time Acc:rivcd lot L1bor11ory by:
/Si1tt11111d
I
j
0111 /Timt
. 'Rrmark&
I '"''-"'i C:.11r lo Coo..l•ntto• '"'d

I I
I
•
I
O<U•llNll•"': O.tpnlll An•-...••• ftltt
I
I J t I
....
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
1'~::30C;-
C03 HO.
Of
REMARKS
CON•
STA, NO, I DA.Tl I TIMI I

.:8I STATION l.OCATION
TAINU\S
OW-3'71~[,~ 'XI ~<;\d.~J. ,~ t'v cl1J e1J. ~Y ~ !I - I

I f I . \) I
31 \ 3 It\ <!rol& _:rn:
b ,..., K.l'1f- -tt"' L.-1:- \ i.1Jl nJo.A
I I
1
! i DnJM05 4 Mtrfll' /.:.J-,'rt J;.9~
·-....
a10 (i\fa t£: ( no± ht'l2lt:Ji 1)
'
I
I
I •
I I
I I I
I
: I
I I I
I
I
'I
I
~
I .I I
..,... I H , I. I I I· . I I • l
I
I
I II
I I I I I
I I I I
I : I I I
1s;,,.,,.,,,, I . ts;,....,..,.,,
"~:=~ 1w;·r;;t~:·rcr·· ?-~
R1linquhh1d by: 0111 I Timi Recelnd by;
5,¥' .}J''r""'~ 11,-i7,~1Jz:..:.'V

. ~~ Li-a.~ ,
01111 I
R.;\nqui1h1d by: 1s;1,,~J jI I Tin\1 R1eiwtd by; 1s1,,.11111d R11inqui1htd by: /S•111a1111d 0111 /Time tf/Racelnd by: m,..fivrtl
I
I
I I
R1linqui1h1d by: 1s.,...,.,,., I
I
D111 /Tim1 R•c1iwed for t.1bonlory by:
ISifttUlll.,
I
i
0111
.
/Time R1muk1
,,..,,_11i: c:.,,., c••• ,,....... , .. Id .....

I I
DlllflwllM: 0r1 ..... A n • - -.. I•
I
-
....
..
-.,-·
--:._ .:.:,. -· ......
•!!._, ~~"'<- - '· ~·
i l

f~30J:)-
OD3 u..S:i;U-t~ HO.
OF
REMARKS
CON·
TAINE RS
R1linqui1h1d by: W,.,uw,.I Relinqui&htd by: ISi11t111111I 0111 /Timi

"'"' -.,,..., I1.,,.""
t~ ~1 1 v ,s~~~·"'.~ · I r"""o -1i ...., ··• V
IW?!f"!S"" v,1- 1 1 V'L'"' v
Rllinqui1h1d by: IS•f"""'" 0111 I Timi
R1linqui1h1d by: IS••"""'" 0111 I Timi I R1c1ind lor L1bo11tory by: Dau /Timi R1m11l11
1s;,,..,.,,,,
,,. ~ ..;._
0t11111N11e": 0.1p .. o1
..g,;~ :_
An•"'"""'",,..,_,.•: to11r •• c••,.,.,...., ,,.1c1 ,,...
v.. .·. --.~.:- I. ·. - --~: .. -...;;7 .. "~·:,,::-::~ -
~ '!'
·,!\:·~·:
~ ~
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD _It} •"

::"

}~30t;- ~
NJ_<, ~h Grn.Js,it-,, ( ~inn(Jm ~ u ;7~. NO,
:--.;::
. . - '
SAMPLE RS: IS•111•111ntl c ~
Of ~ .
~£~·~cl.Lf CON·
Vi· REMARKS
.::t •< I ~ TAINERli

~
STA.HO, DATI. TIMI
8 cc
u
STATION LOCATION
~ .... , -;:
ow-s- ill•o/r. I rt!! 'X l-.!asl" ed., \1\ ()/)~/ i ~ vrfl M'I ~ .~ I '3 ! I - I \ ~ (' O'llo / '\Tr
I ...J \.) I •
I
I D("') ,.,,o-r • .-....- . I 1H1I~
! I j") .b. IA.A?.°<: l t
Mnr-P? <..~1
.
l.; /~AC'1 ~lA~~'- 6.}r517
~"n~N \
J
i I
.
I
I
I
1 I l
I
..
I !
1
I I
.. I
t
.• I
!
. I
.I I
I
I
I
I
.
1
. I
I i : ·- I
I
I
I
I I ,.. l I
:xY".'"'"'. It1-i7,,~'7 \~.:., o

I l I
w,,..,.,,.,,
Relinquished by:
lJt~~!I~ 1 £· ~;7i ti"S~~:~··711•1r1

f
Relinquished
~-f\f\w.
Oa11 /Timi
. ,fl\
Rectlnd by:
J/ff:;NL~.
1s;,,...,..,.,,
R1lir\qui1h1d by: lSi1n•111.l<l Da11 /Tiln1 Rtethrtd by: ISifll•lllltl R1linqui1hrd by: IS•I""'"''" . Dali /Timi R1etl"d by: 1sf,...,..,.,1
ts,,,.,,.,,.,
I
I
t
I. "
,. .. .
R1linquilh1d by: . ~· '. 0111 /Timt R1c1ivtd for L1bo11101y by:

1s1,,,.,.,,., !
I
D1t1 /Timi . 'R1m11l11
I
I I I i ...
..
.:,,,._ ·--
.
-' ,..,- . -:,;' ~,. ... "'
,. ..
OltUl~lleA! 0.lpft .. AC'lle .......IH lhlltfMllll C.llf le Cee1UffttlOf f11ld folH
. ,~-
I "
"
... "'"'-: .
.:_\
".",' ..... ~
.
• I I l

.....
Ji. ~
PAOJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
i63o;-
r-io3
- I~" e.ioJ· srle..
. {1N,.r.a-U{).. Sc.Ul\J·rro.h8\1\"\ HO.
.
~
- .
.
SAMPLERS: ts''"''""'' . . \,,.) , ~ OF
.
)
. l tltii..<.dJ~,J~ REMARKS
~~.
CON•
TAINEAS
a.: a• l ~ ~~
'
STA.HO, DATl TIMI STATION LOCATION
."
O'N-(0 'D ~~~
. . \,o' x Nr.6li\ e,C .. t ~'ho~t'-~ ~~ c; 3 l 3 I I ln I' U"'.tJl,,,.. _:rrrr
\ I / v I
I I
!
J
~ ..~ l"C5T Vt.J\£SS
bt..~~ <:. ..J ~C2!:£ Sr=..A!.::: IS
. l~t\"'.T '( LA~EL ruor
I' I lt._, ()Y~N)""
. I
I
I
I
:: ,
!
I I
I •
I I
I
I t
.
I !
I I
I
I
I I I II
. . I • L. I
I I I
I I
I
I
I
I I I I
R1linqui1h1d by: /Sirnt111lfl Dau I Time ! Received by: /Slftl'lP / ~ R•linqui1htd by: 1s;,.,,,"'" Ilt-2,7-
. Dale /Ti~=
Rtetlud by: 1s;,...,..,.1
LM~"'- .a...-, ....~,, "..,!f \, 1t1 qti'°"'· s~

L:V'
· 7fJ:
1
iwu: . 7 I "BY s~J'l1·vvV•.),,L}. q'f. rrll
Jz'..,vO U_d.~L~
Rtlitquishtd by: /.Sirn11~
,,
' 0111 /Timi
I
I
Rtetivtd by: IJi~111nl Rtlinquilhtd by: IS•f""""' o... rm•, t.si,..:,.,191
Rtetlnd by:
R1linqui1h1d by: 1.s,,..,,,.,,, Date /Time n1c1i~•d lor laboratory by: !

I .
Dalt /Time
.
Rtmarln
l 1.s;'"""'''
•••Id'''"
I I
I
-
DitltllNll•f\: O.lp11°' Ant•--••• l1tlpme111; C.11y t• Ce••<l•ntto•
I _t-,·~
··" '.
l
....
7,
PRDJ. NO.
\ 330t;' -
IPROJECTNAME .
. •.
.- ·~
. , ' .
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD c,...,
'
,:..,.., ,,
..
•·......
,•
~
003 ~4?h ea;..d) Sde..{Ni~Sn-nJdt NO.

- • ·--~
~
... !':. .
SAMPLERS: IS•1n•111,.I . · - ~ • Of ""
Llf\Ll'tf...M. ~v~ REMARKS
STA. HO, DAll llMl

.::I .
<(
a:
I
STATION LOCATION
~
CON•
TAINE RS
8 Q
~,Ju\1t~ 'I<. ICS-kY-roeu'\ aror,s?±~ I 1:-Y~fjA~ciJ

"-.T.>.~-
!1,-.:;cu) ~ 3111311 CC-,"!t;RMAN WfLl.c (AF-'TF! !
\,.y,cl, t?r-0 ttl11n~" ir-0 N,\J
I I
I
u I I !
I f\ ~ mk:>r \I I II
I r,,, D i-J oi ~<;:l r:r \)kl i r.:1 \J~
I I III I I i i : I I l( DA M'F s ~ Noce~ -i £P£'l_..; It

I I
' .
' ; FAZnt::'E "' '
I /
I I
I !
I I·
I
I
• '- · 1
'
I I
'
' I I I
I
w,,..,.,,.,
R1linq\lilh1d by: Datt ~;ru11•••. I Due /Timi
/Tim• : R1c1iwcd by: rs;,..• ..,,.,
I • ;
R1linquilh1d by:
f
1(i:/ilf\~~~
1
~~~~ 1)16/~( s~~'-~.: . -· 11~i1 ~1 \i4 I
~"q"i•h•d /Si,..,,.,"J, .: .
by: /Tim1 '/S•f"''""'
0111 /Timi
R1c1ived by: 1Sirnu11r1I R1linqui&h1d by: 0111
I
I
f I
f\1linq11i1h1d by: IS•r<tU11rtl 0111 /Time Atctiwtd tor L1bo111ory by:
1s;,,.•1111•I
I
i .
0111 /Timt 'R1m11k&
I I I I
•..
... ,;r
- _,..
Dttl•l!NtiM: 0.lp"ol Att•--IH '"'"-"'l C:.1tr I• C•••ll•"ll•t f11ld foln
.
i ... -·
_._ ~ ... :...:.""!:' .... , ·.•:;;··.,,
_.·r~_:~ ,-·
.....
,:·...,.:r~" .11',,.:. ·~~
" ~"
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD ', ·.
PAOJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
\33c;t;-
oo.s HO. .. ,,.. .... . ,~:' -
OF
REMARKS
CON•
TAINER$
STA. NO, I DATI I TIMI
L.
Rllinqui1h1d by: /Sir•"""'' R•li11qui1h•d by: ISif1111111tl 0111 /Timi I Recllnd by: ISirwtur1I
. ~ .
s~\"'1\~~JJ I
"\~v
;~ i,i h-~0 J\
.v Q'
R1li11qui1h1d by: IS111111u11J Oa11 /Tlm1
R1linquhlud by: u.,,..,.,,., 0111 /Tim1 I Rtnind lor Labonlory by:

ISifltllU••I
.
01t1 /Tim1 R1m11k1
011111...,11•11: 0.•r""' Ace•"'•"''" 1111p-n1; C:.•r •• Coo•u•nt10• •••Id f•IH

•.
.
·•
7) SURFACE WATER DATA
....
....
' f , ;· ~I
; ; I '~
~ ' # '
.
9fJ-\·: '3vJ~ . ?UJ- ?\Oil .SUJ-!

' ' .
I\ llo JD LlD L..IO
l\O LJO LIO L.to LIO
..( 10 llO L.tO .t.10 ~ID
..
.(JD ~10 .(ID· <10 £:.JD
(.10 . (10 (ID LIO ~ID
llo l.10 L.fD t:Jo L.ID
(JO . .(ID (. 10 .(JO (10
.<ro <(10 .(10 .( ro <10
LID .(10 .<10 .z10 L.10
LlD (10 '-.ID ~ID .(10
L\O Lio LIO LJD. ~10
(.1 D LID (ID ~ID tCID
... LID LID tlD .(10 ~lD
(o,q i. I -:J • \ 1-.4 :}.~
o.oto o.oos 'D. t.ru 1- . O.<fOr O.lfD<t'
...
·,
' '
.'i ··., •. : a.,

.... 0..1J I' ..111\'J\'/llJ .L.1.IJlJUll..IJ J Ul<Jl!.,:, "
..~
me• W. Andrews, Ph.D.

,,,;.,,,., ~ND ENVIRONA1ENTAL SERVICES, INC.
l~ncuc M. Davis
P.O. Box 13842 • Sal'annah, Ga. 31406
""'' '""""'"· .,, . '.;: . . 912/354-7858 .
~ •• •> ·•. ". "~ . :· ' . '·. '
. •· Ii ·. , REPORT OF ANALYSIS
,.... : . ' ......
'
• ' • ''. • ,1 •
B·~\ .. Thorpe
1
i: .: {. , .; . L.. 1 ·, REPORT NO. 5239 ., . ,· :, i
. Engineering-Science ·: ·, · ~ j : ; •
i I
DATE. RECEIVED 7/7 /83 >t;-;;;· .. •; . t
57 Executive Park South,· NE· · ·
BY·~ Clie~t . ;\·,~;·;).:·; ~;.;, ,~;.
1
• •
Suite 590 ··SAMPLED

-·~:·Atlanta,GA • . 30329. l.'< .: .. '· •• l • •!' . -~ .1· j .
.lfNTIFICATION: Samples submitted to laboratory ' :

. "U;.:.. ;.;:i
,,., ':;."
: ! .: ~ ~·:· . ~ ; .:; :
'Tf:THODS: EPA Methods· of Analy~is (Model 610/0.1. Corp.)
. '
i I
.. .. ..' . ' ; f . .'

I
'·
'
. ' . ! .· .~ ~
: ' ! ·,,·' ·"
f
I
I .
SAMPLE ID.II TOX CONTENT (ppm)

07-1000-01 0.010
07-1001-01 0.005
.. ·,
07-1002-01 0.007
07-1003:01 0.007
.. .
'
01-1004:..01 0.008
." ..
. :
! . .·'
f ·- '
.....
: 1, ... : '
..
1 ' • ·:
i;, I·.·.,
~ ' .
'. ~ ..
Jan€tte M. Davis ' l .
. '
• ! •l
. '
! • '
.• ., . ,
;. "·.II
:'. !
I
...
. ·~··- .·-..-- .... ~~- ....-.~-· ... ~--···-···--·-··· --- - --···~--_.,, ... ,,.,,,.-~ .... _..,._ ...... - ...- ,i'.•--ro--······- -- ·-~- ... - ... ~----
8) BORING LOGS
SHEtt J D' f
BORING OW-I
NASH ROAD SITE
NCLL SCHCPATICS ~ .( "'"~
M ('II , ..:i • RI.IA
C0()!.f 1 t/1"l ft()
ow-rn ow-1 0£.S:R!PrlVE GEOLOGIC NOTES
0
I
·" ii,
Ll(.Hl l'l:tDafl .-:"·t~l ... tOJUM SILT ANO (\..A'r. lRi\.C.[ ot
- ,. 11' 51.llNL[SS
IS I .. Ml
'Ill
SAND, 0(.tA.~ JONAL 81,..A(lll. onGAHI( $1AINS
$ T[[L
NNlt'..!~fH
PH'C
..... , ...... r;::,
SE Al
' - sw•1•1,.tMt~1AR~
------ 15
•" CAA' M:IST
0((A!_tr~·~•l
l'l' 1
~ttr~
H""'~
tN 1NfftNltS
LAYt~CD
or f'JN[
[1,..Af ANO SfL1 •lfH
TO JilltOJUM SANO.
;!.
,.~ x.~
'
.. !,
fltNt(l,,_Jt[ !>tM.
STt.INlC!! !.HEL
0,f"!Jr' !:u... OllCO
•lt.l $(PECN
.
!5 •"
•"
~·
f IL Tt~
tU-ROK
Sl>NO
•" (.kAY JillOt~l JilltPJVM LA.YtWt~ CLAY, ~EO CLAY LAYCRS
...,,
.,,.::'
7
Af•J:POJl.l~i\.lCL.'J
INl'ERv•L.S
IJ'l:O' fHJC,kNESS Al tr.At:GVLAJI!
·'
.·~·
10
"
sort
.:_·:
•" GUAO(~ 10 Y[RY (LAY
' ..
NA lU~Al l'JACl'l.~ll.L
!O .
" .
CA'AO£S TO SOFT
lfl1Jt,:
GRADES TO VERY SOFT
J8/6u 181 319' SRD•N. MOIST SILT ANO <.DARSE 10 FJNE GRAVELt
"iS"6" IB14t'I LITTLE CLAY, t..llfl.E FlNt SANO CttLL)
16/6H 1e~sn
GRADES TO •El
20/6" tBt61:"1
GRADES tO '40IST,. DENSE SlLTt SOME

FINE TO COARSE SANO, LITTLE FJNE
GRAVEL
- f'tRJMAIH 8EHTONI 1£ SEAL
~F!LTER SANO TO-AOIC
GRADES TO •ET
SlAINlt:.SS SlflEL
o.cno SLOTlEO
•ELL SCAE:EN
76/f'>" tnJIO!I
mrnr Tor> Of SCDROC.k

~~1 !'.. ~-''''1'1. ,,r~c __, N_l'{lk'iJ\TJQ~
• urm!ST\l~llt:D ~Ml'Lt.
fn (Jl~TI'FH!t:O S/\Mf'Lt
D NO f.Mll'l.t Rff(Wf.Rto '1~ 1( !'If" <'f ('.(Hf> jfJ'-\ ti·•? c;rfln1
!!!<T l :r~ 1!1~ __!!~l_!'!~t-~~T.!!.!!!

"Ji~ lh rrc> le '"l"" ll::M )\rutnnlft• St•n:l
/__f;:- 0if'-tr.f1f) ~llrhn"*<'"'t. r--::J r,,-,ntl 1-i 1t rr
•
ftp I""-- cnPI: J,.n,;r: 7.0NI: ,,_..-. ff1Cfur .. ~,.i\.lv""*n 1tt ft!•J>fpl>l,.,,.f,.. 1mgtto fu t:nrft 8,_fl t:'!:' :g Wor:-- 11 f;cn•f'"n
~- _ n ~•!:'IT nwr.
~ Vin~tl'llr•.,.t •uvh1r• c .. t:l'Jtlf.- t .. si;nld.-
1H:CPVl:r.)' ::J:: rt It• ft.1t•d ;on,.
,.,,,. •~Id-
~;!
J DAM .. tl 0 Moon•
SH[ff t 0,: 1
It)
BORING ow-1
SAMPLING ~ NASH ROAD SITE
HELL SCHEMATICS
1'1 C"# Jr:' 1J
f'Ol..IA T !ti'{
r.t;.tfl{f
/ti.IA
1¥0 lllC l-
Cl'~I f()/lf
1'0()
~
l.J
'I
~ OESCRIPTIVE GEOLOGIC NOTES
65]
rn.11 TOP er PCDROttt A1 •••••• a«:OROCtt IS
OOLOSTUN[~
TO tJORINC# flJ'>MlJ.fATtD A1 A b£PTH Of' 6e.t•

ON JUN[ tJ~ t9f4.
~ 1r,,,. of torp Io's r;.-;.?1 G:tout
. '1.4'~£ (lr Prr ie ronl!" l!';;.:1 hrntonlt" 5f'3l

~~er t•oH.1_: _l!i.1'.n!:~~i: !_<~
A:.i;:' Olrw-.llri slft-1>,.n,ldrs f '.:.:J f.,'tnd ['i} t f"T
~"r
~ ' ' •u·:turp•, .,~..,_.,.. lilt 11t11tu-o-.lll'lltifl 91"'19t"' fn tor• 91fh ~=:I Well St•tf?t~n
~- 1Tticr.or nwr.
HCOl'l.l'I'
_..,...,...
::i::
f.ll.,t>t11Ht,." •re"."•urfl
I f l'IJ< t \H Pd l')tl~
c:'"' n11<:lt• '!i • lulfldfi!
_. 'rr·id
DANIP9 D MOOn•
"'.... BORING ow-2
::: ~ "'...,
I:)
SAMPLING
~ ~ u NASH ROAD SITE
H'E:lL
ow-2
SCHEMATICS
El.f'•
~()(/lt1 ""
,,,,c .
~ 4tlf'[
lft•A
NO
"'u
~
~
~
I!;
<:)
~
~
"' D£SCRl!'rtV£ GEOLOGIC Nu TES
PN0t£C11Vf CA!.!NG !>VJ.If ACl COt.tVltlCIN!i.t C.14•"•'°'"• MVOOY
/ WHH LOCttlNC. CAP
1.
L1GMt P'•C•tl MOl!.1 '!,lll't !-,IL.1, Ll1lL£
10 I II 0 , lHE SANO
II GAA't •Cf ~[01VH 0EN5t 'IN£ SAHOt

TRAC[ Sh. 1
PRtMARY B£Nl0NJ lE SEAL
l .. . :·
·.~ ·
.. ."
" C.RAY AND f\Rr.1•N M01S1 t<lJff LA\Ff•[O (LA'Y
AHO Slt..11 !.IL1 LAY[f>!. AfiUV1 Jl't~• 1HIC'lt
-·--1° ID $1AlNt..ESS STEtL
PJP(
~--F'JL1tR SAND so-Rott.
6 .. 10 Gi.!Al>t~ TO SOFT
- - S1A1Nt.ESS STEEL
O.t'HO St..011£0 C.RA'f M01S1. VtJH' sort l AY[Rtb CLAY I RED CLA'f
1 ..
WELL SC.REEH LAYlPS AMC 1'.PPROJ!.IMHELY 11'5° THltK 1'1
J/lt 44 IN1£S?VALS
16 BORING t[~MJHAlCO Al A OtPTH OF ll.0 1

ON JUNt 6, 1984.
!'I S1NlMRO l'FNJ:TllllTION TEST
• l!tll'ISTI!R~r.o Sl\"ll'LE
fq,y .'.!:.\ -~t:l:k ~C:lfl:Mi\TJ_~
0 NO 51\Ml'Lt R!:C<•Vl:Rl:O ~ l~n., t"lf f;(Hf! 1Q'~ r_;;;j! (;t(1\.ll
:!,"i._! :£. fb flH I t 1nn' L;;;:) fh·nt nn i I r f;r4J

~r:'n- c.:"1~:r.:__J_t!!_,r!l!~~T~
~ Olt""'tlr ~llc.,t!'n~lde\ r--::J f.;m11 1'1 ltPr
•
Jin , ... _.__com: t.ofi~ ;-,owt ~ f r'-:St.1rtt-:.·'»<-" et 11trrtn1o.IMttt •ngh• tt" '"....,• a111lt ~ W,·Jl f.ct~:t>tl
l ___"' l"LPcrnr en~&

IH ("O\'l;RY
~
:::r::
tlin•u1flt'"'d fter:fvt•
t f 1'" t ut,.d ltJf1('
c • tftld1'° ~ ~ ~utfl<k'
_. Veld
- ,_..._..... ····--------------~--------------------------------------
IHCt:t 1 Of
.... I
....
::: \o BORING ow-3
I( ...
()
:t
.... Ii! NASH ROAD SITE
H£LL 5CH£MlfflCS ::::: ~"l
....
~ ~
ow-3 c:i
OESCRIPTll'E GEOLOGIC NOTES
PP~lftflV[ (A~lNG suAr A(C CONDI 1 IONS1 GPASS.\, lAt.L P.PU$H

./ •I TH LOCI< INC. (AP
0 ...
,, C.k0UNC SURr A{E l
" :;:~
( - CONCH[ l f II•" ~~.

~
..:..t ··-- !.Ufl>Ll .... l:.NlARY .. [N'JUHfl[
11.~'
"" .,,..
•:.--;;
~ SEAL
"
.
9.t,!.'
"
"'I! 5
-':_
tl
: GRAY AUU ftQOd\I MOISl "'ECllVM LAtlt:lf:r'J CLAY
ANO SILl, f,..A.(.E f")U[ '5AN(J 0 f<J.-ft•H 51Lf
LAY[J.·!, i1J·J"'P(HUMAl(L'r 1.-2''1 #1 11 IN
lMlt~NlS!. Al 1 ll.t" INllPVAL!.
·-1° 10 I!
ltt
PJl'E ' GRA'r MO!Sl
C,JUO[!. 10 !-llf"f Al 6.0'
M(DIUfll LA'r[N(O CLAY
t I! 10 fUO (l,.A't' LA'fER5 AJ"'l"fiOJ:lMAlELY l/J0°
'tHJCt( At 1.11 11 JN1[f:VALS
r a Gfi:ADES 10 ~OFl WftH OC.CASIONAL SJLl
1
[U.C.KrlLL LA¥£RS .t.J'f'POXIMAlELY II!'' fHl(fl:. AT JC.0
• a
15 c~
(LAY LAYERS P:EC.OM( LESS OlSlJHCT AT lt.C'
• l'J csaocs 10 vErn s,or1 Al 11.0'
10 I!
II a 20
..
'· GAAY ANO 8ROWHl'r-£O M01Sl M£01UM STIFF
25 LAYERED CLAY ANO SIL1 Al ia.o•
ci,
I!
12~ C!f
121'5" 13 ti
1'1A
,
I
$£AM OF MOJ St Jof£0JUM 10 FIN£ SAMO Al
l:IRO•"' MOIST MEDIUM SH.1 ANO COARSE TO
16. !
1
FINE GfUVEl 1 TRACE FI NE SAND. TRACIE.

14 n ! CLAY (tlt,..L)
30 GRADES to o•:n ANO VERY ST JI f s IL T AT
21. 5•
~S/.S' J5 5 GRADE$ TO HOIST ANO ·HARO SlLl

IOO-"< 16 t!
GRAOES TO MOIST AHO MEDIUM
I
~M
·. - 2'1 1e. n 45 GRADES TO WET
·:.. - - STAINLESS StEEL
0.010 SLOl1EO
WE.LL SCREEN
l-= ..... - F" IL TEA SANO 10-ROK

23 19 " 1I
I
GRAOCS TO COARSE 10 FIN(. GIUVIE.L ANO

60 SROWN ORY HARO SlLl, SOM£ WIE.AlHEAIE.0
fa'O(k FRAGMENTS 1 TRACIE. , JN£ SANO
65
i-Ol·PO
t ) ti'O~J:TH l(" ~l!la:f/\('f.
l • UA Tr; T1:1:T1:1>
~ l• "'" or ,..,,.. ~ h;r<;s f:i;,~ Crnut
.
'l-4~'£ l'h '°f'f_ Ift fr>n".I L~ l!f·ntnnil(' ~>('A)
_1!,'~n- c1;1 1r... 1_ r;:.·~ 1 ·~~i,.t_Tl_'~
~~ (Hr-st Ip ~I lc.,..,Mldll'S t:;:-:J ~ond I .iltrt
,. •
,~ ,,,,.,..-. ft!'rfu"''"'··~•1.-.•rt e• nrf'r-nri""W'lff! "''tJI., to corf' ""is t=°:3 \i~')) ~t.."T£'f'fi
~ ~hH•roH7"'1' ffo(furf>
t______ 1·1 Hcen C"oN:
c • <.11itltf <:. .. \uJfldt>
Jlt(n\'J.P\ ::i.::: ff fl' t Ut"~d 11"1fl ..
_. Yr-1d
DAM~· 0 Moon•
....
~ lg BORING ow-3
::; i..: ....
5,t.MPlllfG
~ ~ I:! NASH ROAD SITE
'-
H'ELL SCUEMA TICS f<(('JI
'AM"fl
a •o,:A·
\;
'l ~
t
,,,,, ~
A(:
·~ CO.-/IC<"'
RFC l<fl!f
~ e.':l
f()L!lftf
I:)
DESCRIPTIVE GEOLOGIC NOTES
65]
lOP O~ 8£.0ROC~
1
68.T
~EC..RO(K IS DOLOSTON(
70 &N'<:JNG 1LkM)f.f•H:D AT A t>LPlH or .l.'1
1
ON JUN[ 7 • 19lU: •
0 r.:o ~M".1"Lr RI CO\'l.r.t:tJ ~ Zrt'tt>nfrn'"•lo'-!t fji'fll Grm1t

~f"nJ
.I . . ":!"i·£i:. Rt•'"<" I e ,,,.,f' t:m lh"nloni lt•

~~~•S°t ,~, l.l·T 1 ~~1,_0~~·~·\}_!\IN
...f!',..;j;:' Olt"'l If" ~I h·hh,ld"."S C..::J f..nttd rlJtrt
1:r1 "{'om: 1.t1r.r: iom: ~ frrtthir"'"• ,.,,..~..,,.. n1 fH•111n111f1'1.,t• ilf'l'"JI• to <'O'• ;,1id1 t=e.3 Wrl) ~(.'ft'"C'O
~ _ l'I l'l'I UT t'('ll!E

,,,......,.... JUnf'refJffl1 ltn-:tor• c - Ci\h: It• ':I' .. ~uft Id•
PITf}\'l-IW :::i..:: f tf'l"fun•'1 J"lflf'
..,,,,. \f'ld
DAMI!& 0 M o o n •
Stt[Cf l or I
I..
~ co BORING OW-4
Cl
I.'.; I.( .....
Sl!MPl/NG
~ ~ ~
NASH ROAD SITE
I..
WELL SCHEMATICS <~fl"t( \) ~
lti('W N(I • •u~ f:OR£ ~cPr ~ ~ ~
ow-4
cou11r nPt
'"' UC NCI>
~ ~ \:I
DESCRIPTIVE GEOLOGIC NOTES
c::.
-ri:.otEClJV[ CA!.ING
/ WIYH t.OCt\fN(; CAP
0 MtkEO SAN0/WAS1E f:'JU.

-i - - CONCRfl£
___...._........ $UPPL[Ji'[NlAP't'
8EN10NJ1£ SEAL GRAY ...OISl SILl ,1,NO CLAY
.. . """
11
"
I
l GRAV wET MtOluM 10 FJHC
OPOR. SOHE BLA(.IK. SlA,JN
~ANO. t~ACt SILft QM(;ANtC
'"
---1" fO StAJNLESS STE!:L
PIPE
..
"
10 5
•
!!I
!!I 10
GqA~ ANO BQOaN MOJSt LA~£Rt0 SILt ANO CLAY.
t fU('.£ , J NE SANO
LA¥tRS APP~O.k. 111° HtfCll(
GJUO£S 10 wet etttO•N StLt l<ND CLAY
a' "
•.
!!I
15
l
10
" GRADES TO C.LAY, 1RACE SILT
:~ _,, _ _ N" lURAL fJA(.kF ILL II !!I 20

~,:
A~
.;--
'.(·
:·1! .. !!I 25
--:::
::,-
t~t
2 13 t'I 30
.. " 35
26 l5 ti 40 BROWN •El $1LT AND f"INE TO COARSE SAND,

•6 ~.
::.-:: LITTLE MEDIUM TO f"JNE Gs:tAYEL
SRO•N wEt MEDIUM TO FINE SANO
45 '~'~' i BROWN MOJSt SILT, ANO COARSE TO FINE :SAN()"

LITTLE FINE to COARSE SAND CTILLI
_, - - FILTER SAND
Pq IMARY BENTON I TE SEA\.
10-ROK
50
55
i
GM
GRADES TO wET
GRADES TO MOJ 51
-
-
_- ...
60
- - - StAJNLESS STEEL
0.010 SL011[0
- •ELL SCREEN
- 65
_____...~EfHONfTE SEAL
mrnr tor or etot:toctit
•n !<:' w1:1.1,...!:t:11t!¥'T1c
" HJ\NllJ\Rll rwr.TAATION T&ST Ci~l! Gro'Jl

g::.;7,1 tlC>n\.onHc fi<'al
• lltll'l~TllRn!'.I> "l\Mrt.t
C-,::;J ~nnd 1'1 I l!'r
~3 Ii•• I l Gcr!'<'n
0 NO SJ\Ml'Lt 1u:covr.R&I>
IDAM'P.IR 0 Moon•
SHCC" 1 or 1
.....
... ~
BORING O\V-4
~ t.' .....
$1:1.ff'LING
~ ~ \.) !NASH ROAD SITE
..... ~
Hl:t.L SCHEMATICS 1~ ti•
~AM"t..J
/If(' I
·-~-
CC'lfl (_(JN£
I.,)
'l ~
Q..
i
ltil"
CCl/14 T T •I'{ It() ft/:( /f()f)
~ ~ DESCRif'TWC GEOLOGIC !VOTES
l'.l
65]
70 lOP or 1n.1'
f-l(DW(J(..:
et f>t:il:l(M. I!. OOt.O!i f OHC
flU~IMG llf~Mlt~Al£C AT
1
I> t•[J-lH Of 10.J
t'IH JUN( IJ, t9fl4 •
Ill STAtllJl\RO rtlll:THATIOll TtST
• UllDISTllHlltP Sl\l'<rLF.
Ill DI STtlnM:ll ~l\M!'L[
0 NO Sl\1'11'1.r HICc•\TRl:D ~ ltnfl' or ff'.Uft IO'!t\ r;·-·l Gr('\ot

-J;;:~J- fk•n· I• 'l'Jne c;;2' Ot·ntottit~ SrAl
.
~n' _t.:!)1~!_: ___1!'~'~oy_t-v1i:-J ~
r-:-::J f.rindtJltnr
~ Oir-•l•r 11h:"-ri!-ld.-s
•
~() , ....... ('OHi" t11r::r: 7.0Hr~ ,,,_.,,- r. •~-iutft~.. ,hnwn ,., l'tJlrfCJ"'""''~ ttng1P 'fo fO•t" e1d'l ~ ht 11 ~cn:rn
l ___ n:ncnn
t•J;("O\'t;U)
ro1rr.
~
:::r::
lllinfl•ellt,.1 fr&durfl'
r;e .. tu,•lf ,,,,.,..

c •talc.It~ ~ .. ivlflilk>
... "("id
DAMl!l9 0 MOOA•
SM[(t 1 or z
"-
BORlf~G ow-5
...,
~ \o
...,
~
,_ SAMPLING
"'~ ~ I.>
NASH ROAD SITE
"-
\.>
:t
HELL SCHEMATICS f.L t'•
~ A""t.I
r.-r • lfVA" COi+/ ::(Iii[ ... ~
Ii..
~
r tf'f 11;;tt
~
~aiJ.\ r AIO RU
ow-5 a-.~ \:)

G£0LOGIC NOT£S
I J l IJ
.
!tit•• ti
lj','(,"' J rt (.l.'A'I' At.If) f·liQ•t-< M~l!.T lAll~C:tt (lA" ANO $1\.T.
lf..A([ t' INC !.AND'
10 SLLT LA'llJ.Jf ,f..f'Pf..t•H ... ATtL'r 1n·u lHl(k~
O((A!, IOt<AL ft: AM~ or•£1 f INE 10 MEOtUM
!>I.HO U'Ph!..<>:fMAl[l" ll'ln Ttfl{kNtSS
'/
11
--1 JD STAJNLE55 S'fE(L • l'l GRA~ •El sotT LA'l'[HCr CLAY
PIP(
RED (LA't LA'Y'CP!o Af'f-nOxIM.l.TELY ,,,JO"
15 fH1tkNES5 AT IP~EGULAft INTERVAL$
... 20 (IJl<AOES 10 \tEPl sor-1
BACKF" ll.L ... 25
10 .. 30
11 .. 35
RED CLAY LAYERS. AN'ROJtJ"'1:1.TELY l/10°
THIC..KNES.S At 3,4 .. lNTERYAl.$
., . 40
eAOWN WET LAYEREO SILT Ar.to C.OARSE 10
FINE SAND
39.<!l' 13 ti ·' 45 BROWN WET Sill ANO FINE TO COA~SE GfUVEL,

"'•O.'.•' t 4 e SOME (OAftSE 10 F lNE SANO• TRACE CLAY ( 11 LL l
50,;;:2' IS ll 50 GRADES to HOJST
- - ~RtMARY
BENTON I TE $£AL 55 GRADES 10 f'IQI.;'£ GRAVEL. LESS SILT•
!)!!¥
,........ FIL1ER SANO 10-ROK
,_ ti!>t.!' I 1 " 60
1-: ··--stAINLf$'S Stt:El
-_ O.C'llO SLOlTEO
WELL S(REEH
- •• It 65 GUAOl~ TO WEl Sill• SOMt MfOlUH TO
FINE GRAVtL. ltTTLC •EATHE~EO
~COJH1CK YRAC."4tN1S Al 61.0 1
Fl'"•~ Gru1.tt
t'~ ~·(·111rmitt• t;t·n:I
c-..:.:::J :;.uuJ 1·1 t t t ' t
~.:::! Wir-11 Srrf'rh
o.n.Mnn o Moon•
IHl_l f t o• I
...
I-
BORING ow-5
Sl:µPLING
:;; ~ ...~ NASH ROAD SITE
~ ~
~Cl.
H£l.L SC/f{MllTIC$
lfA l'•
((Jtlflif ""
Ttl'I
.
~AMII\ j
,,.,.
tr()
C(Jffl
li'(C
(:('1<1
NQP
I-
l.J
~
'II ~
~
<:)
~
\S
DC$CRIPT/V£ GEOLOGIC IVOTCS
65]
fOP or 001.0STONf BEDROCK . , . . . . . .
TO &l'lltJNG U~'4JN.A1l'.0 AT A O(PfH OF 7o .. o•

OH .IUN( l•t Ill•~
l'I nA!l!l.l\hP rF.lll'.TRJ\TIOO TUT
o II<' ~Mll'l.1' ~l:covntD ~ lrnfl (tf rotf'" IO'I tr.~ Gtout
~ BtPf"fl• ttmt' ~ tlt•ntunUt" r;<"aJ

~ Dff!-!ll tp 'kl h:h•111ldPl t:.::;J ~and rl u .. r
.,_.,.,... '''"rfur•-.·!:tmwtt e1 ,.,c;pto•l""t., 11n9tf' to cm-e l•h t=.3 w.,J J Scncn
~ M~ntotellrtorf hef"tv•• t .. c&tclte s., tvtflflt
l'J:fHTHT COttt
Pr.nw1:111· :::1::: f t fV f '" l'>d f('t"lf'
_. Yt"ltt
DAM119 B M o o n •
BORING OW-6
SAMPLING t: NASH ROAD SITE
WELL SCHEMATICS UMJl'tl
~
u
•tCW UJlfC COit/'
""'" """
"I;
ow-s
COtJNT
""
ltO ltte. ltOtJ
e: D£SCRH'TIVE 6£'()1.0GIC NOTES
PROTt:CTIVt: CASING
WITH LOCklNG CAI' aUAFACt CONDlTIONSt Y!llt:Y JllVDDY WITH
- STANDING . . tt~1 MAHHV GRASS
GROUND IUR•AU D
-~
fUK!D IANDl'WAITI: 'ILL
·····"
- CONC .. Ell
~
GftAYwtt "l:OIUM TO P-INI SAND. LITTLI IU.. T.
~
- - - SUf'PLIJlt:Nt A•Y
91!NTONITI llA\. IOME ltLACk STAINS
I II
"
! JI
• II
~
l
l( IT •. ID
OfllAY ANO ltftOwN JllDllT STIP"P" LAYIR!O CLAY
AND llLT•
11\.T L•Y!A$ APf:JADXl .. AtlLY 1/tH THICK AT
•
~'
..
•I II I"' I N1 lRYALI
- - - 1 ° 1 0 ITAINLEH ITUL
.... '-"' PIPE GRAY JllDllJ SUP,,- CL,AY
•; a II
GRADES TO M!DIUM Ct..AY Af 11 .. 0'
·~
R
.\
·~
• • II 16
'
1~
1: • '"' ZD GIUO!S TO WIT
tl!O CLAY t..AYIR& APPftD•Ui•ATILY 111°
1HICk AT I ll"f 10 1° INTl .. VAL&
~
;.(: COUICTAllLI ONGANIC ODO"'I
NATURAL BACk•ILI.
... ~~
;;.t
;i~ I I 1' 26
i·1'll ..
,
~
".:'
'ti-
,.
;O:,:
t,.1. . .Q • ' II
:ii
l~~
l'M•
,,
·"'
i f • 10 II RED CLAY \.AYERS APPROXtMATf.LY 2"' 1HICK
~~t ~:Q?;
AT I .. INTERVAL$ AT ,s.o'
TRACE $MALL SLACK MOTT\.I! OF ORGANIC
'"J MATERIAL IN RED LAYERS
~l ·.tt
::.!. •'i
;,;";: l II t'I 40
'$!~· ~
... ~ :r.
_•1'
,:[
~f ~ " u II BROWN ORY f4EOIUM SILT, AND MEDIUM TO
FINE GRAVEL, TRACE CLAY• TRACI! FINI!
~·1: i
~'.".
TO COARS! •ANO IT 11.L I
_,.
... .;:;.-
~
~1 :~< J9 IJ t'I 60 GRADES TO JllOIST
~ d~ ---
PRIMARY
1_•'
llE.NTONITI SUI.
- - - F l l . T E R SANO 10-ROK
6lAS 1 . t'I
:c: {
:~• -
. t-:: '- - - - STAJNLISS STE.Et..

GRADES
111.T
TO WIT• MOR! GAAVIL 1 LESS
> c--
0.010 SLOTTEO
WELL SCREEN
SShS- u t'I 60
. - ..
. :;~. ,_=
'.\,--
~
66
.,;,;:...._.,. p
SOIL SNll'LlNG lNf'ORllllTlON
ti STl\llDl\RD PENETRl\TJON TEST
• UNUJSTURBED SN1rLE
II OlSTURnEo 51\HrLE: ~. TO WELL f;ClltHATlC

a NO s1111ru RECOvtRED ~ Zc-nfl! or tor• •on ~ Grout
-¢:£ BZ1!1 ernlonl tl• Su I

!!Q.C_I< _emu: 1t1roRAAT1011 8'0<d. · -
~ O•p .. ~llp tlh:h"1l~s ~ Snnd riltM
&P I• ~~CORE LOSS ZONE ,,,.,-.. huturtt"li·t'xtw" at eprro•Jfr'lftte engle to core e1ds t:::.:I We 11 Screen
~ rr.RCJ:flT CORE
......,..,..._ Mtf'lf"r•tluo fracture c .. t1tclte t .. tulf ltHt
nr.cov1:nY ::C:: f re" tvred ton•
A Y('ld
DAM••••oon•
------------------~~-·--·~-··~-·~~ ..-···------···· ···"·· S-4:Cf l oi- I
BORING OW-6
SA Mf'L ING
..."' I NASH ROAD SI TE .
.......~
1t£Ll SCHEMATICS
tlLOllf'
COIJNt
II()
,.
~""fl.•
""' ""
•
.. ('(I/ff ({)~(
lftc lfDD
~
~ D£SCRIPTIV£ GEOLOGIC NOTES
66] tOP OF l\£VA0Ck 66.0 1

BlDAOCk JS ODLOSfONE
aoRtNG Tt~M!NAltO AT A btPtH OF 66.o•
ON JVNf: It. 1•14.
... . TO _
....
~lJ.!_L__,<;__M•n .rnr·~-"!:0~
1'.'1 STllNDARD rt»l:TRllTION TEST
• l!llDISTllRUtO 61\MrLE
Ill Ill ST\IRl•r.o ShMrLE
0 NO SAMrl.r Pl:COVl'.Rl'.0 ~ ZrnP of rnr• tou f:i1~ Grout
. ~ 8r•cc It rnne ~ ncntonit I".' f'Jcn I

~c:·: _<:!~·~~~~·~~~
~ 01('-,1 Ip llfC~f?Ath,flll t:;:;J San.I rl ltrr
fto ··-com: 1.or.s to»c ~ frHtur•\,~hn•n •' aopro•l"'8ff!o ang:r• h) cor• e111h ~--;;! We 11 St'tt't"h
l_! __ rt:nrmr conE .,,,...,...,... .-h-.tor•l 11,.d free fut• e .. c1tlclht $ .. 1ulf Ide
m:rovtnr :::C::: tr,,r:tured ton•
.... '"If
9) SAMPLING LOCATION MAP
i I i i I Ftl. I 1231 •io~/1
I
I I I I t I j l I i
BY ...!).\~ CATE ~1/'N
tN
~ APPROXfMATC LOCATION ,OF Sf TE: BOUNDARY A'
r ••- •• DITCH/-. -- - B'
ow-11h7 ··---
DITCH/ ~ow-1
• so-1
• so-2
• .
~ .;~~~
·:~{{~f~~~~f.:
.... -· :-~.~
--=--"\
•::- " ...;.:-.•
.-".'•
~~i~~l~~:.:(:~~;~§¥
A I ~~-:;:~:-
1\r£.O-w-6
1' -.
I •SD-3 ~:W-5
ow-~s
EXPLANATION:
• SEDIMENT SAMPLE
c ~ SAMPLING WELL 0 200 400rEET
11 )
..... OW-1
G) ~
c m SCALE
;u Ill
m ~ NOTE I OSTERMAN WELL IS LOCATED
< ~ AP~ROXIMATELY 1000 FEET PLOT PLAN
0 WEST OF SITE.
< ll
.... m NASH ROAD SITE
10) PERMEABILITY TEST DATA
tN. .~ . -~- ...
-
-
deu.-1
- '
- ·---0 C-U -
{, Lj 3 y:. f 0
- ~
~) 11
-7
-7 .. f)~ ,c: I{)
. ------ __ () w_-:;--
_-------~-o w ~v .
·--··· -~----·--~-··-.-·-··-----
'
,... -..-.~-···
CALI BRAT Jot~ DATA

We 11 1 OW J
A'*-5.6258E 0J
8= 6. 15J6E-02
D= 0.0000E 00
J0= 272
T0= Bl 493
Ef(sec)= 30
WELL DRAW DOWN
I
OWJ -2.96
-- Ef<s.,c)=
WELL
OWJ ,
~·
6]
ORAWOOWN
'
."\ !
-3.63
-
I ' ''·
ET(sec)"' 90
WELL ORAWOOWN
'
OWJ -4.27
.... ET(sec)=
WELL
l2J
DRAWOOWN
I,
OWl -4.88
ET<sec)= J5J
WELL ORAWOOWN
I
OWJ -5.22
ET<sec)= lfl0
WELL ORAWOOWN
OWJ -5.16
ET(sec)= ~JJ
WELL DRAWDOWN
1, {'t j ~
OWJ -5.61
ET(sec>= 211
WELL O~AWDOWN
''·
OWl -5.76
If I
ET<sec>= 271
WELL ORAWOOWN
OWi -5. 07
Ff<sec)= 301
WELL DRAWOOWN
OWJ -5.93
Ef (sec)= .3.30
WELL OR AW DOWN
OWJ ·-6.00
ET< sec>= .361

WELL OR AW DOWN
OWJ -6.06
ET<sec)= 390
WELL DRAWOOWN
I':; r"-'·:-
I
OWJ P. ' -6. 12
El<sec)" '121
WELL ORAWDOWN
Ef(sec)= 421
WELL DRAWOOWN
OWi -6. 19
ET<sec)= 451
WELL DRAW DOWN
OWJ -6. 19
_,,, ET<sec)= 481

WELL
OWi
ORAWDOWN
. -6.25
.... ET<sec)= 511

WELL DRAWDOWN
OWi -6.32
.... ET<sec)= 540

WELL ORAWOOWN
-
OWi -6.32
ET<sec)= 5?1
WELL DRAW DOWN
- OWJ
ET<sec)=
WELL
600
DRAW DOWN
-6.32
- OWi
\0 ¥"-'-~-.,,.,,._,
ET< sec>=
WELL
C·;i.''
631
ORAWOOWN
. -6.38
OWi -6.38
ET<sec)= 661
WELL DRAW DOWN
OWi -6.38
ET(sec)= 690
WELL DRAWDOWN
OWi -6.38
ET <sec>= 7.21
WELL DRAWOOWN
·-~-
OWi -6.'15
F.:T<sec)= ?51
WELL ORAWDOWN
OWi -6.45
ET<sec)= ?Bl
WELL DRAW DOWN
OWJ -6.45
ET<sec)= fill
WELL DRAWOOWN
OW! -6.45
ET<sec)= !HI
WELL DRAW DOWN
OWi -6.45
....
ET<oec)= 87.1
WELL DRAWDOWN
OWJ -6. 45
ET<sec)= 901
WELL DR(IWOOWN
OWl -6.49
ET<s•c)= 930
WELL IJRAWIJOWN
•''
OWi -6.51
ET<sec>= 9fil
WELL IJRAWIJOWN
OWi -6.51
ET (sec)= 990
WELL ORAWOOWN
OWi -6. 51
ET< sec)= 10?1

WELL OR AW DOWN
"" DWl -6.51
- ET<s•c)= 1051
WELL
OWJ
DRAW DOWN
-6.51
- ET<sec)= 1080
WELL
OWl
ORAWOOWN
-6.51
.. ET<sec)= l I .10
WELL DRAWOOWN
--
OWi -6. 51
ET<sec)= 1111
WELL ORAWIJOWN
-
OWJ -6.51
ET<sec)= J 1,;l I
·-.. WELL
OWJ
IJRAWIJOWN
-6.50
ET<sec)= 1200
WELL fJR0WOOl4N
- OWl
ET<sec)= 1231
WELL
-6.50
ORAWOOWN
.... OWJ -6.50
ET <sec>-~ 1261
WELL ORAWIJOWN
OWi -6.59
FT<sec)= 1291
WELL IJRAWDOWN
·~-
OWi -6.59
ET<sec)= 1.320
WF-LL DRAWOOWN
OWi -6. 59
ET<sec)= 1350
WELL ORAWOOWN
OWi --6,59
- ET (.sec)= 13fl0
WELL
OWi
DRAWOOWN
-6.59
- ET<•ec)= 1410
WELL ORAWOOWN
FTC5ec)= 1380
WELL IJRAWOOWN
OW! -6.58
Ef(sec)-~ 1410
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW! -6. 58
Ef(sec)= 144 I
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW! -6.58
- ET<sec)=
WELL
OW!
14?1
ORAWOOWN
-6. 58
- ET<sec)=
WELL
1500
ORAWDOWN
..-
OWi -6.58
, Ef(sec)= 1530
WELL ORAWOOWN
-
OWi ·-6. 58
ET(sec)= 1561
WELL ORAWOOWN
.. OW!
ET<sec)=
WELL
1591
-6.58
DRAW DOWN
OWJ -6. 58
·-
- f.T<sec>=
WELL
162 l
ORAWOOWN
-- OW!
ET< sec)= 1651

-6.62
--
WELL ORAWDOWN
OWi -6.62
--
ET<sec)= 1681
WELL DRflWIJQWN
OW! -6.64
. I
~:T<sec)=
J 7 ·' l
WELL ORAWDOWN
....
OWJ -6.64
....
- ET(sec)=
WELL
1741
ORflWDOWN
DWI -6. 64
- ET<sec)=
WELL
OW!
1.771
ORAWOOWN
-6.64
-..
,
ET<sec)=
WELL
OWJ
1800
DRAWOOWN
-6.64
... ETCsec)"' 1830
-- WELL DRAW DOWN
-
i1 )'>' t>'j' (,,.'
l f•'tALlBRATlON DflT!l
We 11 J owrn
A=·-5.6923£ 01
B= fl. 5279E-·02
D= 0.0000E 00
'·
"·
J0= 273
T0= 62293
I ,..
ET<$ec)= 6l ' ., '
WELL DRAWOOWN
, 1
'
.... OWlB -J.58
Ef(sec)'= 121
WELL ORAWOOWN
OWJB -1.76
ET (sec)= 1110
WELL ORAWOOWN
.... OWIB -I. 89
ET<sec)= 241
WELL ORAWOOlJN
OWIB -l.95
ET<sec)= 301
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW!B
U(sec)= 351
WELL DRAWOOWN
- OWIB
ET<sec)= 470
-2.19
,. WELL
OWIB
fJRAWOOWN
-2.28
ET<sec)= 481
..-
WELL fJRAWfJOWN
OWlB -2.35
Ef(sec)= 54J
- WELL OR AW DOWN
- OWJB
ET< sec>=
WELL
601
-2.48
ORAWOOWN
- OWIB
ET<sec)=
WELL
661
-2.54
ORAWOOWN
OWJB -2.61
ET(sec)= .721
-
WELL ORAWOOWN
OWIB -2.74
-
ET< sec>= .780
WELL DRAWOOWN
OWIB -2.80
-
ET (SOC )o= 840
WELL fJRAWOOWN
- OWJB -2.87
c~I LL lJ1-l 11'1UlH·Ji l
OWJB -2.8}
Ef(sec)= 9fl0
WE.LL DRAWOOWN
OWlB -2.93
Ef(sec)-" 900
WELL ORAWOOWN
OWJB -3.00
ET(sec)= 1021
WELL DR(lWOOWN
.... OWJB -3.06
-
Ef(sec)= HlBl
WELL ORAWDOWN
OWJB -3. J7
ET<sec)= J 141
.... WELL ORAWDOWN
OWJB -3.26
...
.. ET<sec)= 1200
WELL
OWJB
DRAW DOWN
-3.32
;lJ1l·''
- ET<sec)= 1261
WELL
OWJB
DRAWOOWN
-3.39
ET(sec)= .1321
WELL DRAWIJOWN
OWJB -3.45
ET<sec)= .1381
WELL DRAWOOWN
OWlB -3.52
ET<sec)= .1410
WELL ORAWDOWN
OWJB -3.59
.!rl!' ,!
ET<sec)= 1500
WELL DRAWDOWN
OWlB -3.55
Ef(sec)= 1551
WELL fJRAWDOWN
OWJB -3. 72
ET<scc)= 1621
WELL DRAWIJOWN
OWJB -3.JB
ET<sec)= 1681
WELL DRAWIJOWN
OWlB -3.95
Ef(secJ= 1711
WELL IJRAWOOWN
....
OWJB -3.91
. 1'
\•'
i
... ET<secJ= 1800
WELL ORAWDOWN
I\)
-
....
OWIB
FT<secJ·= .1 Bf>J
W~ LL DR!'lWOOWN
·-3. 98
am m a~ LI (soc)c
WELL
l.Jdl
fJRf!WOOWN .-m, ••·~.t..~·,···•., .......... , .......,,
OWIB -4. 17
U Csec>= 2041
WELL DRAWOOWN
OWJB -4.2~
EHscc)= 2Hll
WELL ORAWfJOWN "
OWJB ,\1 ''-4.33
ETCsec)= 2161
WELL DRAWOOWN
OWJB ·-4.43
ET<sec)= 2270
WELL DRAWOOWN
OWIB -4.46
- Ef<sec)-= 2280
WELL ORf!WOOWN
- OWIB
EfCsec)= ,:Z340
-4.56
WELL IJRAWOOWN
-
OWJB ·-4. 56
ET< He)= 24fl0

WELL DRAWOOWN
OWJB -4.65
ET<scc)= 2461
- WELL
OWJB
IJRflWOOWN
-4.70
ET<scc)= 2570
WELL ORAWOOWN
- OWJB
ET<sec)= 2580
-4.76
WELL DRAW DOWN

OWIB -4.83
Ef(Hc)= 2540
WELL DRAWDOWN
OWJB -4.89
ET<sec)= 2/fll
WELL DRAWOOWN
OWIB ' -4.96
ET<scc)= 2761
WELL fJRflWOOWN
OWJB -5,02
ET<sec)= 2871
WELL ORAWIJOWN
.... OWIB -5.09
- ET< sec)=
WELL
2880
DRAWOOWN
""'
f_!(st:C)· / / ! Jj
WELL DRl-iWDOWN
OWIB -5.02
ET<sec)= 28/J
WELL DRAW DOWN
OWJB -5.09
ET<sec)= ?.8Rfl
WELL DRAWIJOWN
OWJB -5. 15
ET<sec)= 29'11
WELL ORAWDOWN
OWJB -5.22
1;',1 •• '
ET<secJ= .3001 i'
WELL DRAWDOWN
OWIB -5.28
ET<sec)= 31361
WELL ORAWOOWN
OWJB -5.35
,..,
ff(secJ= 3171
WELL DRAWIJOWN
-
OWJB -5. '11
ff(secJ= 3l!ll
WELL DRAW DOWN
OWJB -5. 46
£ T<sec)= 32'10
WELL DRAWDOWN
OWJB -5. '18
1,.
ET<secJ= 331:10
-
WELL DRAWOOWN
OWJB \. , '-5. s4
ET<sec)= 3.361
WELL DRAW DOWN
OWJB -5.61
-
-
-
-
...
,
/I · ,i
ET<sec>= l37A (X
WELL DRAWCOWN
OW2 3.05
....
ET<sec)= 13m:;
WELL DRl'lWDOWN
-... OW2
ET<sec)= 14;:>2
DRAWOOWN
-2.85
WELL
- OW2
ET<sec)= l '119
-2.69
WELL ORl'lWOOWN
·- OW2
Ef(sec)= 1475
-2. SJ
- WELL
OW2
DRAWOOWN
-2.31
- ET<sec)= JSAJ
WELL
OW2
ORAIJDOWN
-2. l l
... ET (sec)= 1577

WELL DRAWOOWN
OW2 -l .96
.... ET<sec)= 155~

WELL DRAW DOWN
OW2 J.78
ET<sec)= 1580
WELL DRAWOOWN
OW2 -l .58
FT<sec)= J6A6
WELL DRAWOOWN
OW2 -1. 42
FT<sec)= 1633
WELL DRAWDOWN
OW2 -J. 24
10= 273
T0= 59355
EHsec)= .16
..... WELL DRAWUOWN
OW2 -0.57
.... ET<sec)=
WELL
42
ORCIWOQWN
OW2 -0.57
J.
''' '·
Ef(sec)= I 68
WELL ORAWDOWN
OW2 -0.57
F f(sec)= ~M
WELL DRCIWOOWN
I I \c. l''
WELL DRllWUOWN
OW2 l. JS
Ef<sec)= l 19
WELL ORAWOO!JN
OW2 ' "' ·-l. ?3
[f(sec)= 1'15
WELL DRAWDOWN
OW2 -2.33
ET<sec)= 1JI
,... WELL DRAW DOWN
- OW2 'I -2.91
- ET<sec)=
WELL
OW2
l'l6
DRAWJOWN
-3.51
-- l Ef(sec)=
WELL
OW2
222
DRAW DOWN
" -4. 12
-- l
Ef<sec)=
WELL
OW2
2'19
DRAW DOWN
--4.J2
-- ! ET<sec>=
WELL
273
DRAWD~lWN
-
OW2 -5.25
''
Ef(sec)= 2'l9
WELL DRAWDUWN
-
OW2 -5.65
Ef(sec)= 37'.j
WELL DRAWUOWN
- OW2 --5.99
ET<sec)= 351
WELL DRAWOOWN
- OW2
Ef(sec)=
WELL
3JJ
DRAW DOWN
. '1
·-6.29
OW2 -6.52
ET<sec)= 403
WELL DRAWUOWN
OW2 -5.72
Ef<sec)= 479
- WELL
OW2
DRAWDOWN
-6.96
Ef<sec)= 455
.... WELL DRAW DOWN
- OW2 -J. 01
- Ff<sec)= .<181
WELL
OW2
DRAW DOWN
-7. 12
- ET< sec)=
WELL
OW2
507
DRAW DOWN
-J.26
Ef<sec)-" 53'.l
f1r'\Allflr"1111.I
WLLL IJh'.111~1 JllHI I
OW2 -7.26
ET<sec).~ 533
WE.LL DR(1WDOWN
OW2 -7.32
FT< sec>= 5n0

WELL DRAWDOWN
·- OW2 -7.39
--
ET(sec)= '386
WELL DRAWOOWN
OW2 -7.46
--
ET(sec)= 612
WELL DRAWDOWN
OW2 -7.50
-- ET< sec)=
WELL
OW2
638
DRAWIJOWN
-7.52
-- ET<sec)=
WELL
OW2
655
DRAWOOWN
-7.59
- ET<sec)=
WELL
691
DRAWDPWN
-7.59
-
OW2
ET<sec).~ 717
WELL DRAWDOWN
OW2 -7.66
.... ET<s•c)= ./43

WELL DRAWDOWN
OW2 -7.66
- ET<sec)=
WELL
769
ORAWOOWN
- OW2
ET<sec)=
WELL
796
ORAWDOWN
·-7.66
OW2 -?.?0
ET<sec)= en
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW2 -7.72
ET ($ec)= !MB
WELL OR AW DOWN
- OW2 -7.72
ET<sec)= 874
- WELL
OW2
ORAWOOWN
-7.72
-·-
ET<sec)= 900
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW2 -7.72
- ET<•ec)=
WELL
OW2 .'·
926
DRAlJOOWN
-7. 79
ET< sec>= 'l'i2

WELL DRAWOOIJN
OW2 -7.70
ET<sec)= 8.72
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW2 -7.72
ETOec)= 818
WELL IJRAWOOWN
- OW2
£T(sec)" 874
·-7.72
·-.... WELL
OW2
DRAWOOWN
-7.72
- Ef(sec)= 900
--
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW2 -7.72
926
--
Ef(sec)=
WELL ORAWl;JOWN
OW2 f 1 ·-/. 79
,.
--
ET<sec)= 95;;>
WELL ORAW[)OWN
OW2 -7.79
-- ;
ET< sec>=
WELL
I OW2
979
ORAWOOWN
-7.79
-- (
-
-
-
--
--
-
CALJBRAflON DATA
We 11 1 OW3
A~-6.?066E 01
B= B.2614£-02
D= 1. 5000£ 01
)0= 2?2
T0= ?1020
ET< sec)= 60
WELL ORAWOOWN
'-'- ~ . \ '\ 8. 09
-
OW3
EH sec)!: J 21
WELL ORAWOOWN
- OW3
ET<sec)=
WELL
180
ORAWDOWN
?.93
-- OW3
ET<sec)= 241
?.85
-- WELL ORAWDOWN
OW3 ?.?6
--
ET< sec)= 301
WELL ORAWDOWN
OW3
<'. ?.60
-- ET(sec)=
WELL
OW3
3fi0
DRAWDOWN
?.52
.. ET<sec)=
WELL
421
DRAW DOWN
- OW3 /,43
-- l'T<sec)=
WELL
OW3
481
DRAWOOWN
?.30
-- ET< sec)=
WELL
541
ORAWDOWN
--
DW3 ? . 19
ET< sec)= 600

WELL ORAWOOWN
--
OW3 ? . 10
ET<sec).= 661
WELL ORAWOOWN
-
OW3 /.02
ET<sec)= ?21
WELL DRAW DOWN
-- OW3
ET(sec)= ?81
6.94
--
WELL DRAW DOWN
OW3 6.??
ET<sec)= 841
- WELL
OW3
EHsec>=
ORAWOOWN
900
6.69
- WELL
OW3
DRAW DOWN
. } ~,: . 6.6!
ET<sec)= 9f\l
WELL ORAWOOWN
ET(sec)= 1021
- WELL
OW3
ORAWOOWN
6.36
ET<sec)= 1081
.... WELL DRAWOOWN
OW3 6.28
- ET<sec)
WELL
OW3
1141
ORAWOOWN
6. 19
- ET< sec)= 1200

WELL
OW3
ORAWOOWN
6. 11
.. ET<sec)= 1261
WELL ORAWOOWN
-
--
OW3 6.36
Ef(sec)= 1321
WELL OR AW DOWN
--
OW3 6.28
Ef(sec)= 1381
WELL ORAWOOWN
-- OW3
ET<sec)= 1441
WELL ORAWOOWN
6. 19
- OW3
ET<sec)= 1501
6. 11
-
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW3 'l 6.03
ET<sec)= 1561
-- WELL
OW3
ORAWOOWN
5.95
.. ET<sec)= 1621
WELL
OW3
ORAWOOWN
5.86
-... EHsec)"' 1681

WELL ORAWOOWN
- OW3 5.78
- ET<sec)= 1741
WELL
OW3
ORAWOOWN
5.61
.. ET<sec)= 1800
WELL ORAWOOWN
- OW3 5.61
-
.....
ET (sec)= 1861
WELL OR AW DOWN
- OW3
Ef<sec>= 1921
WELL ORAWOOWN
5.50
- OW3
ET<sec)= 1981
WELL DRAWOOWN
5.37
OW3 5.37
llllllllbl:lllllllJllllMIUiili-.!U••lllll!ILtltllllJILllPllIPll?illt1lliil''•'. . .,.. ~~~~cc>~ oki~6owt~
1
OW3 5.37
Ef(sec)= 1981
WELL ORAWOOWN
- OW3
ET< sec)= 2041

5.37
-
WELL ORAWDOWN
OW3 5.28
-
ET<sec)= 2Hll
WELL DRAWOOWN
OW3 5. 15
- ET< sec)= 2150

WELL DRAWOOWN
- OW3 5.04
-- Ef(sec)= 22.20
WELL
OW3
ORAWDOWN
4.95
-- ET<sec)= 2280
WELL
OW3
ORAWDOWN
4.87
-- Ef(sec)= 2340
WELL DRAWDOWN
--
OW3 4.79
ET<sec)= 2400
i WELL ORAWDOWN
--
I OW3 4.71
ET< sec)= 24fil

WELL OR AW DOWN
.. OW3 4.52
- ET<sec)= 2521
WELL
OW3
DRAWOOWN
4.54
-- I ET(seo>=
WELL
OW3
2581
ORAWOOWN
4.45
- ET< sec)= 2541
- '
WELL
OW3
ORAWDOWN
4.38
ET< sec)= 27110

WELL ORAWDOWN
OW3 i\\~ " 4.29
ET< sec)= 2760

WELL DRAWOOWN
OW3 4.21
- ET<sec)= 2821
WELL
OW3
OR AW DOWN
4. 13
E:T<sec)= 2881
WELL DRAWDOWN
OW3 4.04
U (secJ "-· ... 11u
WELL DRAWOOWN
! ~
OW3 '\\ 4.29
ET<sec)= 2760
- WE:LL
OW3
OR(lWOOWN
4. 21
-
ET<sec)= 2821
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW3 4. 13
-- F.T<sec)= 2881
WELL
OW3
ORAWOOWN
4.04
-- ET<sec)= 2941
WELL
OW3
ORAWOOWN
3.96
-'- ET<sec)= 3001

WELL
OW3
ORAWOOWN
3.88
- ET<sec)= 3061
WELL DRAW DOWN
'-- OW3
ET<sec)= 3121
3.80
- WELL ORAWOOWN
-- OW3
n<~~c)=
WELL
3181
ORAWOOWN
3. 71
- OW3
ET<sec)= 3241
3.63
--
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW3 3.55
ET<sec),= 3301
-- WELL
QW3
IJRAWOOWN
ET<sec)= 3360
3.4/
-- WELL
OW3
OR AW DOWN
3.38
-- FT<sec)= 3421
WELL
OW3
ORAWOOWN
3.30
- ET<sec)= 3481
WELL
OW3
OR AW DOWN
3.22
- FT<sec)= 3541
WELL
OW3
IJRAWOOWN
3. 14
- FT< sec)= 3601

WELL
OW3
DRAW DOWN
3.08
- FT<sec)= 3660
WELL DRAWIJOWN
-
CALIBRATION DATA
We 11 1 OW4
A=-6. 12B5E 01
B= 7.1428E-02
D= 0.0000E 00
.J0= 2?3 -,!
T0= 81079
I·,.•. •"
El<sec>= 50
WELL OR"1WOOWN
OW4 ~ 1. ~''• -11.00

-.a:-·
ET<sec>= 121
- i !' ·(,!I
.
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW4 -14. 21
ET<sec)= 180
..... WELL DRAWOOWN
OW'1 -14.35
.... ff(sec)=
WELL
:2~ J
ORAWOOWN
OW4 -14.50
- ET<sec)=
WELL
OW4
3A0
IJRAWOOWN
-14. 64
- ET<secJ=
WELL
OW4
361
DRAWOOWN
-14.78
- ET<sec)=
WELL
420
ORAWOOWN
- OW4
E.T<s!'c)=
WELL
481
ORAWOOWN
-14. 85
- OW4 ·I>,/
• , .I\
ET<sec)'*
WELL
,,
541
ORAWOOWN
·-15. 00
' ·'
"'
.... OW4 -)5.07
ET<sec>= 500
WELL IJRAWOOWN
OW4 -15. M
ET<sec)= 551
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW4 -15.21
ET<sec)= 720
WELL ORAWIJOWN
OW4 ·-]~. 28
ET<sec>-~ 781
WELL ORAWOOWN
OW4 -]5.35
- ff(sec)=
WELL
OW4
81]
ORAWIJOWN
·15.42
ET<sec>= 900
WELL DRAWDOWN
OW4 -15.50
Ef(sec)= 960
OW4 -J5.50
ET<scc)= 960
WELL DRAWDOWN
OW4 15.5?
ET<sec)= 1021
WELL DRAWDOWN
- OW4
ET<sec)= 1081
WELL
15.64
DRAWDOWN
- OW4
ET<sec)= JHI
15.64
DRAW DOWN
-
WELL
OW1 -15.?l
ET<sec)= 12fll
- WELL
OW1
ORAWDOWN
ET<sec)= 1251
-15.78
- WELL
OW1
ORAWDOWN
-15.85
.. ET<sec)= 1321
WELL
OW1
DRAWOOWN
-15.85
- ET<sec)= J3fl0
WE.LL
OW4
DRAWDOWN
15.92
,,,
- ET< sec)= 1440

WELL
OW4
.)'\
ORAWDOWN
-15. 00
.... EH sec)-" 1501

WELL DRAWOOWN
OW1 -16. 07
ET< sec)= 1561

WELL ORAWDOWN
OW4 -16, 07
ET( sec)= 1521

I WELL JJRAWDOWN
Ol~1 -15. 14
ET (sec)= 1580
WELL DRflWOOWN
OW1 -15.21
ET<sec)= J/10
WELL OR AW DOWN
OW1 -15.21
ET<sec)= 1801
WELL DRAWlJOWN
OW1 -15.28
ET< sec)= 1851

WE.LL DRAWOOWN
OW4 -15. 35
Fl(sec)= 1870
W£LL DROWDOWN
ET<sec)= JB0l
WELL DRAW DOWN
OW4 - 16. 28
ET<sec)= l Bf:il
WELL IJRAWOOWN
OW4 -16. 35
ET<sec)= 1970
-· WELL
OW'1
OR AW DOWN
-16.'12
- Ef<sec)= 1980
WELL
OW1
ORAWOOWN
15. 50
- ET(sec)= 2010
WELL
OW4
DRAWOOWN
·-15. 50
- ET<sec)= 2100
WELL DRAW DOWN
-
OW1 -16. 57
I ET<sec)= 2161
WELL DRAWDOWN
OW4 16. 57
ET<sec)= 2221
WELL ORAWDOWN
- OWi
ET<sec)= 2280
WELL
-J. 49
ORAWOOWN
- OW4
ET<sec)= 2341
-l. 35
- WELL
OW4
DRAWOOWN
Ef(sec)= 2401
-1. 21
- WELL
OW4
ORAWDOWN
~g.v
(\· f!:. O r wril,.'
0-·v· ·Y-r:r r;· -,;
Ehsec)= 24 ~
WELL DRAWDOWN
'W4 -0.92
-nutm Ii I , .. ,,__,,,,,,...,._..,__
to~ l..iVCt
IS Wtfr'l/2.
Ae;xivt, ii> u <Q.,
leAt->$~~
})~. O( Jo'
... 1
- OW-5
TIME WATER LEUEL
17.0556 16.7000
IJ.0611 16.7000
Y1)uuft2. A'
17.0625 16.7000 "35~D
-
1:>,)...",J
~
j-1t)L-\'._
OW-6
TIME WATER LEUEL
- 17.0933 15.7967
J7.0i33 16.7645
17.d~33 15.2161
17.0933 15.4096
t7. 4344 17. 7653
17.4354 17.7653
17.4'104 17.7553
-
17.0933 15.5387
J?.0933 15.6032
J?.0933 15.8612 17.4923 15.0202
l 15. 5387 17.4933 JS.8015
17. 0933 l 5. 6577 17.494'1 16.0006
17.0933 .15.2806
l 7. 0933 14. 9580
17.0933 15.1516
.... 117.5021
,>17.5036
15.8045
16.0006
- 17.1122 15.3451
< ll·. 5051
·~Jl-. 5106
<17.5121
ll7.5135
·it7.5205
16. 2620
16. 4581·
16.5888
lq.7196
1?.5432.\C,
- 17.1122
17.1122
17.1122
17.1122
15.'1741
15.6032
15.7322
15.7967
17.1122 15.9258
17.1247 16.3129
t?. J31B 16. 5709
. ""':Ds>¥cr tv1·".i
4. J....hc. , 17, J.S,
.,._vf,
)lfY g.?-
.';)'\~
•17. 1512 15.6032

'17. 15'12 16. 1838-
•17.1613 16.5064
'117.1642 16.6354
•17. 1712 16.7645
H.7.1743 16.7645
'17.1812 16.7645
117.1842 16. 8290
T/.T9rrTB:-~29r
17.1942 16.8290
17.2012 16.8290
17.2043 16.8290
17.2112 16.7645
17.2142 16.8290
I
....'\
8 -i
.
·..ii
6_
(~;\ 5 _-
~~}\
\
I
I I
, I
l '
j -;
; I
I
.l L '.....:.
l!
.. i '
i
i
i
I
I I I
1
I
11
ll
: i
, ! I·:
- I
i : :
I , ,
I i l
, ''
I
~ ;
I
Tl
I ,
i '
' I
'·
I ,
: '
'o ..\. L
T, '
u (,\ I/
fr,. 7
- N
lO
5D
lD
"'1"
,.,.
.~
.":--"
4
.\
'
.) .
-~,
r- -~
:···
~·
Ill
z
0
iii
:;:
a
g
"
L•':'i,,
'\~ ~;
(..,:~·~~·
-<
"
~
u
-6
:::<u
:ra:
H"
-fll
~:a 2
!!l<O
0-i
-.......
.Jw
~::i
!>lW
(1):0:
&~J
i:
IO.
9
l l i ~
- ,I'
'T~
. I
I
'
' I
!
- 2 - _Lr·
i.i; I , ·
ii I ,:
:I 1 '
.....
:1 Li I __!
i
() i j II ! I
~\ I I ! i
'~ .. , IP l ----r 1
'. 1 I · , .1
9
7
. q:
6
.i
u
'·~ L
l;-
0 .5 5
iil
~ j
"-'J
·,u.
t-i,i
·n
ll.tfl 4
,w
.';is
(~ I
~
~
- h.""
!.L
.... ~- (iQ
vu:
3.
2-
I i
. l.*1
I
..'•: ·
-11
.\ I
0 1 10 l'f
(__) l I __.;
r ll.
10 __
-[ ·-1 i 'T
. I!
-
l I ..-L
I '
.,;.,
. I I II
'~J
II I I
I
I
I I
__ 1_1 -
I '
I i
'!""•
-
- N
LO
5
I
r
J
!
\.0
,J I
I
-
"'1"
' '"'i
II
-
'· ;,~
..__,__,t-
:(' ' 4
Ii I
-·· r-
3
...,.si I Ji
-
I.''
3 I-
~
<:.:;>
I
10
lO?
I!
--t-H-+-LL/
1·
I
. I ·1···
7
-I
.I
1
I
6 J
-
·-
-
-
d
~h
... \J'
'0z"
- !ii
>
Ci
f! I.
I0 ·'·~..l..-l--L.-LLJ~llWJUilJj_ilWJ[lWJllJJJJ
L-'-1'_-J-l....L.Ll.LLL l
'1.!\ (/()
Wu>
!J)'t:
3
'N
:w:" i '
j l !
I .
I
'•
:·;,a I . !
"J 2
! '
i
: :
I .
i . :
' i
- lr~ 1.
-- ji \ 7 _.._
. i
. -
I I
1I
rI
- :. --I~
':....../
I 5 ~---- 1· .-
- I 3
I ~
I
; ·1
I
I
- i ; I .
I
i : •
l
i
.
! ' t
l ' ;. : i
'
. l ;
!:i i ' ; I .
'
. I ' I .I
' ! ! i l
I ' I
l '
" i!I
I ' I .
I
•
, I! I:
: -L.. . I .
- .
. .
I·
~ - ~
i(
' ·- !
1
I i .
! I
I
10 ___
,..,,,.
i
9._
a__ t
·~:;~ti 7
',,;,,j...'1
6 --
-
5 -·
4 --
- I
-
': l I
'
'i t1 i I
I
:J - _;_ 1
r-... I : f I
r-...
- O'I
.,..,.
• r."
~j"t 2-:...
I• 'f
!
' I
I:I
_i
'
-~--lw-
·
__ L .
-
•.1<;
i
I
Ii~ -i
I
I ,
- ,,,r
- ' '
I
•
-- I
, I
i ~ !
I : I
: '
.l- - I -
P»' '
.... x:
I ;
: I
! • J
,. ~:h. ' '· ..

'i
I
I..
1-
i !
':1 !-
'.:-11~· . .~ . · 1· I
' t" i I i I' i

..
I
. ~
:
"
,. I; -1
j
I Ii
I [
I i
';
Ii •
i !I 'I
1 ' !
; :. ;; II
_Jl:.. . I -~--1 __
·. l' /. 0 I, (: '· }, <.. I I } ',
r/r·~ ,ll-~u L~
··- .. _.····-- __ . ,J/; ::: _ _o(, {p 3 (':...(;, -=--· '3' 0,. ~ W?A.-
--·--· - .... .. -- L ,;:;:;- W fi3- ~. 18.3Cff\-.. 6 &o -~-f.<!-
-
~· ---·------- ..,,. 17.. ~-- ..
1
::._ .
/{,_, ~ . D, 3 i /6 =- 10, t/ u/)\_

$' ~ _i:.
.;> _,,._. _ . a& o _ft-t
<?_____
- .. ,_ .. . .
~ (~~., !Jd~ 9')

17.
- a~( ···4;) -
:--:?,)
- 8
. :)_;)_
L ...
~- ..... ~{1j. (/gq) \

- ... ( I? ) A
-
--
\ ____ ...
- ·--- -·~·-· ·-~ ~ --

CJ (A_} - _}_ 0
)J-v ·"' .1.. .. ;/, -: -. SS, 3 /& : . /& 3J~S C./?11-.-
L ::: Iiµ =. 'l4 ft,, 7 l l-1'\.. . 6 I . ::: (R (} _>!L-t C-
O.== r7~.
1, fb :r 1ss1. e_,1v-.-·
3300 Ae..-c..
Al·-.
{}"'--'- .~ .. ~
[J (£~ '."_,,,l r J
( ~:') _L,__ . . . 'f{)t·"'r..7)) ~- ( /{~:f'(p \
fj ('/-'l-.?) (3300-fDO) . . /SSS-~
1104'00&'-f
(lj. - 7
. 0 ,9 3JJO ___
- _.,_,.. ____
' ··-· - ~--·--·- -- '
L .1 - - - - - - ·-··- .•. : - --
() w -c)__,
-
--- ~.
.
"'° J'&?...-1 .. _. ___ ,__
.• . . .. . .
)J_I ~
. . . -. -------------- -- ____ .L._ ~- ___ c;F=.:. ;?_ z.~.5. -~ 6 (

/A' o /0--" c::..
I
_/) ::::____ /? ___~_ ·- . .. /~ == CJ,L/cJ = /d.<f/ ~
_........... -·--·~------- ................. ~::::. ......... ~ -~ - ........ .
-.•- --·-------~--' ---- ·····-·~ ... . ..... </~ L J

-~--J1v~---------•d ..... k ( -0 . ~--
Ii
-·'
~..........·-------------~ '2f .. L. (-t..;L::-c,J . /-1.::L
·~·--- 0J---·---·------...... . . . . :.... -.. . . . .

.. .
---
--·-· -~----~------
.. (~s) --· s. 3111
-7 1 crce 'bt/ · ·
- ....~. d
.____ ijj~ .-- J) .... -- - .. - . -,c ( .
· _,,)( h_ :; l? o 7 0- ~ I0
________ ......... - ... ___ .. ,., -·
.._
---·---------·- -~·--
•·•-.II: _ _ _ _ _ _ __
1{ -- 9 , 5/t -:: Io &.V: e./)/f'--
1::::_
. . .!-..
~ .3Ci DO (JJ~
. ______ , _..::_---··--·- . -·-
·-
---------- ·····--.---·-··--···----------· ...... -- --·-
- - - ---·--------- --------- --------···-----~--·--· -· ......
-------- ...
--~--~ .. . rwv=-.1 ....
L =__ __ ./J µ .;- :!J1{f a,,rn.,
. iJ : : : ... -· ~~ .. t:> .. 7S--~ ~ /J~
-
- -·· ~· ·-----.-~---·---- ··-~--~--- -·- . cl,. == -- .,.2_ ~ -:: . 5"- .~
/-1.
-'.
-
---•-'••-··-----~M•-"-• -·-·~··- >
~-
1/3, 1 -~---
;~. -~~-----~~ ---·
·......
'•
'
:..~· ___________
. , , ___ _
.. .,
;....-.
.."!':':':_ .----~------- ·-- ,.

.. , _ -----~- -- ~ :;:___ j_~
-
L ~. 1'f 6+ <= ~!t
D ~ ·- -- _1-z .-- C/VV\

·.d -= -- --~- ~-
-~ -·---- --g . __ ::.-

_. .·-·--·~h
~- - --~--..,,,,_____ ··---~- -~- - -
. '
---·-·-·------------~---·--·- - .
·-~ ----------~-- - -~---· -···· .
..
·-·--------·-~·-----·--"'---------------. -
~ l . 1. ,.._:;- :::: 'I c; . 'l ~
: M _..-, -· \ .b I - tJ . :::>. s-1=;:. q-~ ~·
-Lr : )2 \ )' \J 2- • D7 -: ?.~. c;

G;> - · I 7 l- n) -:tZ, 1.2s-~
.
1<
I
....
J . -=- c;;- c t"'- .
"""'--· --·--~--..---
....-· ~----- c, 1
015' 0
.. ~3. c;
. j d-, I
-·- - -- .-
,;;;;:--- ----·---- ·~~--~~-~--· -~ ---- -~-
,.._ <
·.
·-----~~------····----- . ----~-- --·- . ·-
- - - - - - - - -·----· -------· ---------------

11) BACKGROUND INFORMATION
..
-
OFFICE MEMORAtlDUM SYRACUSE
:·\CTI0'.'1 l\FO
~----------< ----------------------------11 _!'ile: ____ /3 3 o OQ _/_______ ----
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i • - - · - - - - - - · - - - - - - - - ! f - \__·!1!'._f:_ _____ _
------ ------------------------I!---·-- -·--·····-····---~------ ·--
ROUTING
114.7 SR
OFFICE MEMORANDUM SYRACUSE
ACTICJN HffO
To:
__ _
-- - - - - - - - - - - ________________JJ _____ _
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __J] ______________ ------------- -------
1-------------------111-:;-nc:r_:____ _
----- - - - - - - - - - 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _[!____________ --- ---
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - J l -----------------------------
------------
--- --- ----
c A ------ ).(~~ -- -- =-~1~1"&'~------------- ---~

- From_:_U.....U_~~ .6.}__ ~·
- ----
2ili=-~1cuvjuut _~~-J~_J__ H~~-------------------

. . lh:
l1':'.11 !L!~u1red
Reference(s): ----- - -- - -- ---- - ·--
Q;v blif'13 J_ )'luJ/- l<J I 'flv ~

/Jo,Y. ~ 1 h $/. -1- ()J ~ IJ ys IJ U'-
T<-y t 6>L Cf (~) . Yfo_ ~ flcL
~()~VJ~~~~
~ ~ . i&fµ "'- A14QAL, F~
~. 7li__ tLuLu Pu µ;_, r4_ '1iuj~"'";f-
I~~ 1~v-~~,1LY ~
~ ~~ ~
.(),A.A._ ;wt/-
~~~ !~-
~ : • • • • •" • •" • • • •••••'°•lo.,• I"" I"
ROU'f l~G
114.7 SR
·-z
.
l
.
I
'
!
" I
Peter Buechi, Senior Sanitary Engineer, Region 9

Martin s. Fergu•on, Environmental Chemist, nazardoue Site Control
Sample Testing from the llaah Road Site
~ t. '
August 29, 1983 .. ·- I .

I
' J I
r
Enclosed is a taboratory Teat J?.eport for the 1utmpling of
ponded water taken July 11, 1983 at the Naab Road Site.
Diethyl phthalate, Terbutol and Toluene vere identified in the
extracted aample. The former and latter are hazardous vaates
(priority pollutants).
MSF1cl
.Kncle911re
i
CCI J. Rankin i
c. Goddard
'
"'
"i '
·. i
' I I .
~ .. ·. . -
I
I
f
1 ...
.
~
! ..
t -.•:····
!
I ti- i 1'.t 'I
J u
NYS OtPAR1llENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
l''Y.: ·~:,~ .. ·Division of Solid Waste Mobile Laboratory'

,, ' ... Facility: \0~ '\; .Q. Sample Type:?~ ~l6 .
Date Sampleds 1{11[~~
.
Sampling Site ~~
\-\..o.
Lab. Number
. S3 -lC\(-01
,.
Parameter Units
'
pll SU
.. tductivitv oluns .
~ .' ~ !
Cd mg/l
.
Fe mg/l I
I ' ''
' .~
..
Zn mg/l
Cr mg/l
Pb mg/l
I
Ni mg/l
Cu mg/l ''
·- To...-b..., .\.-o l
I
c../MS
. '"'~
\cktJ. Jic~kvl plJ~ .. '·
' ~ :
.. '
.
'fb l U(!' t\ <(. ..U-5/..Q.. tt·1 ! ... : ii . t,
I ... ,.•' :t
'~
' '
,'·.· •1.
. 't
.
''
"
'
: : ', ~ .
'.~ i
I
'I·.'
·:i'.·
i1 : I;.;·_,
'i ~
l
·..:11· .
. ~ t . - '
·i
' 1i ». ' '' 1<.'
·~
~
'\ • -t,;
,:·d:'
'
.'·:a.
....
\. -• ~.
..
NIAGARA COW/TY llEAl Tll VE PARTMOIT
·.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: · ]anwvty 27, 1984
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT: INFORMATION REGARVING NIAGARA SANITATION

NASH ROAV lANDFHL (REQUESTED IN DECEMBER 7983
TELEPHONE CONVERSATJON I
Attached aJte eopi.v.. 06 vaJti.oM doc.umert.O 6Jf.om ouJt 6.ii.e.& Jf.e9aJtdi;19 tlie
N.i.agaJr.a San.i.tauon - Na/.:ih Road Site. Thv..e doeument-6 aJte p1tov-ided i)oJf.
youJt .lnooJf.mat.i.on and ma!J be pJf.ov1.ded to youJt eoM1L1tan.O 60Jt Plm.J.ie 11 State .
SupM6trnd .lnvv..t.i.ga:Uon pJiov1.ded th.l-6 depaJttment .l-6 pJf.opvr.ttj CJ1.ed.Lt.ed anyoM
.in60Jr.mat.i.on Med .lrt the PhMe. 11 Jf.epOJr.t oJt .&ub.&equent JtepoltU.
Thi.& depaJttment haJ., vaJt1.ou...& oti1vr. 1.n60Jr.mat.i.ort JtegaJtd1.n9 tiiL& .&1.te whi.eh L6
not attaehed but ~ ava-itabte 60'1. .i.ri6peetion -i6 de,&.i.Jr.ed. Thi.& 1.n6011mat.i.on
.lneludv.. c/Jr.aw<.ng).) 06 tl1e HookM 11 8'!..i.ne L.lne", C-i.:ty 06 NMth Tonattunda
SewM map.& 60.11.. neMb!J aJtea/.:i, 0Jt1.9i.na1 c/Jr.aw.lng.6 by KAe.hb1.el fng.i.neM.6 .6l10w1.rt9
ti1e pJf.opo.6ed loeat.lon and· d-imeM.i.OM 06 ti1e d.l.&po.6al. tAe.neh 6M love Ca11al
«.tl-Otv.., oJf.1.9.i.nal .f.ett.M.6 between DOT and NCHV { 1968 J and M1.9.i.nal bOJt.i.ng tog.6
and loc.atOJr. dJr.aw<.ng).) 6oJt te.6t bOJt.i.ng.6 ma.de on .61.te 1.n 1968 pJi.1.0Jf. to digg.i.ng
tile d.Upo.6a1 tlf.enc.h. ·
The . lnvut.i.gauon eondueted by tld.6 depaJttlne.nt 1.n June, Jultj and Aug11..-6t 06
1983 came to the 6oltow1.ng eonctM1.oM:
J. ThMe .l.J.i JteMonable evidence .i.11 tlie 6oJf.m 06 pfaM, c.OJl.Jte,)pondenee,

eu., whi.eh i.ndi.eate.-6 that wa..&tu 6Jtom the. love Canal wvr.e d..i..6pa.&ed
06 at th.l-6 .61.te.. It .l-6 .&u..6peeted tha.t d.Upo.6al occUJtJted i.11 a .t:Jr.ench
dug .6pe.c1.Qical..ltj 6oJt t~..W puJtpo-6e..
2. Th.l.J.i de.paJt.tme.n;t 1~ uriabf.e. :to locate. any pvr..&on wlto. cfa,iin6 :to have
be.en pJte-6e.nt wl1en love Cana,f i.uv..te...& wvr.e d..Wpo-6ed 06 OJt wl10 could
pJi.ov..ide 6.i.Jr.-6t-hand 1.n60Jtmat..ion on .&11eh d.l.J.ipo.6al...
3. VaJti.ou:..& Me.a Jte..61.denu, 60JtmVI. JtU.i.de.riU, City 06 N0Jtti1 TOrlilH.Unda

0661.eia..e.& and a 60Jtmvr. e.qu..ipme.nt opMatoff. have. JtepMte.d that
.lnd1utlf.ial Uli'.Wtu wvr.e. ob.6Mve.d in Me.a,& 06 land6.<...U cue.d 6oJt
mun..ic.i.pal.. d.i,.)po.&al... TJw4e. wa.'6:tU aJte -6a)d to .i.11c!ttde. eau. '6UC'6
,fo cVrl11M, battvr.y ca-.6e.-& > 911aphLte, pallet.& and lamb1a.tA.n9 compound-&,
but not the. «.Mte...& 6Jr.om love. Canal..
Petvi Buecli.i
Page 2
Janu.aJty 27, 1984
4. 1t b.:i be.f.ieve.d that mi.tch 06 the. mmi.i.c.ipal iu:v.ite. and the .indtt-~tlt.i.al
1tU-1te-& .fb.:ited above wvie littJr..i.e.d .i.n 6oJtmVL pond-& and boJr.Jr.ow p.i.U.
Mo~t 06 tl1e dupo,~al aJiea wa~ afifU!J~ we.t and -6loompy pJt,{OJt to
db.:ipo,~1. activ.i.ty. At .feMt one faJrge Viench ~ dug ,,~pe.c-i.6.ical.fy
6oJt 1N.in.i.c.ipal utv.>te dupo~al..
5. Tfivie L!.i no -&pec..i6.{c ev.i.dence indicating tl1at 06 6 ~,{te mi.gJr.at.i.on
06 cont.,amlnanU f1M occ1V1Jr.ed oJr. tha~ a di.Jr.ect contRct hazaJid Lb
p.lr.Uent; liowe.vvi, tl1e ava.ilab.fe da:ta L!.i not concfu.-t..i.ve..fo th.Lb
.1r.e~pect.
Tl1L!.i depaJr.tment coM.i.dvi-& 6ollow-up .i.nve-&tigation at th.Lb -&.i.te to be nece,~Mlj.

Add.i.t.i.onal -&ampl.i.ng and anaf lj~.i-6 o 6 ~oil and gJr.ou.11diootvi Me co1w.i.de.Jr.ed 11ece-&-6M!J
to con6.iJun wl1ethvi oJt not Jr.U.i.dentia.1 MeM adjacent to tl1e -t..i.te /lave been
.impacted by contnmburna 6Jr.om tlie -6.ite. Thu depM.bnent b.:i cd~o concvrned
that adequate data Lb not ava.ilable to a. He.M tl1e potent&l. 06 expM1V!e to
pVLJ.ion.~ w/10 may be on -&.ite, .1r..e9Mdfe-&-6· 06-whethvi -&uch pVLJ.iOM Me on ~.i.te
legally OJr. .i1.legall1J.
,,
c
Thb.:i depaJttment .1r..equ~U tliat we. be ke.pt .i.1160J[me..d 06 a11!J act.i.v.i.t.i.~ 06 VEC
wlth Jr.e...~pect to thb.:i -6ite and tJ1at we be liept .i.n6DJr.med 06 an!J add.i.t.i.on.al.
.i.n6oJtmat<.on !fOWl depaJttment may have oJt obt.ai..n .in tl1e 61dWle.
PleMe 6eel i)Jr.ee to contact me with al11J quutioM.
MEH:M
Attaclune.nU
cc: M. N. Vaughan
D~.s}::iosnl nf C:-l"r:~.i.:::'11 \·i:lfito
Ccmtr:-ict l-'1"';C 57-15; i'/~LSZ 67-1
l . ::1r);-1llc ;·,rt:er i;d_, Ei<1q;:,ra Pt,l ls, PHiG!r:;,L ::;1cnr.o l>'i
Va 11. KE:n..:HL'.\1
Bldq. 5, F.oom 507
cc
...
D~}rir.utho Cl)Urse of conBtxuct5.on of the L~~al le Art.::rial in
the City of l:iar;ara Pal ls, buriGd chEr.1ica l \·:~s tc '.!.7 <'.S cl!cou11tercd
durii·:g eZC;il.TJation for il sto:r:-.! DC:!'Tl::.:!r lL~C .:llc.;;g f'J:"Oi1ticr 1-.venl..!e
between 97th. cI~d 9Sii:!) St:-eets. i~u::-t1H:r C)!:)lO!'."';::;tion rcve<:.lcd
that ·tha c!12!·,icctl w;..-!t>t.:: 1;i2.teri;il c.::.::b1:1cicd un1:!cn· the pro;::iosrn'.i
locntic1n of rcloca.tt.:..d. Frontiei- t~vc~:-;ue north' of tho c::-~istir:-J
nt:.:-eGt~ 'i'he toti"!l qum1ti ~y o:;:: chc:-~ic:::ll.:. in tho pro_?OGed rof.C:way
..,,..,.,.
..:J
T':"t. ....
~·-1-.;,....,,te<~ to b"" llL.)0· •'Y
'\...iJ -~····•'· ....
J.··o c'--,,·~ic-,•1••
.. •-• 0 1-n. ·:::'ou1-.a· unr1 e-..r· or
....:;; . ,,...... • • ••~t ,-~ l.A-..:.JI ,...,~-~ ..L .. .. .. ~ ·-'
Douth of, existing Fro~tier Avenue.
~·:hr:-:-1 the ~·~w;r line e:-::cava tion f i:::-st hc:r;u.n, tho cher;;.ic<'.'!J..:::. ~-;-ere
.;lt":fl ·.···A •1>1r. ,-la'.:::. :l."}Q•'g ••; ~.~,
•'l-•- .t .._,_ ., r"\·L~ ••,•
t,J._:.·. .; ... n··~--r--.L..c,.;'l
_ ....... t.....n.*.l:::.t.--··...:.. ... -{-~--~ ~ "j .-;•~,: C'
P.,1.. ...... ~....,. L-' ·~• ~ .:,,~l ""' .tt•.
c;;:..:;.,. t...14U t:!ct"-'':::J.J.,,,t..L. - · ... ..L.-
prorr;9bsd :::;cv~ral cc~-::plai:1t!:; frc·n ;:Hij.:!ccrn: '·r.n~;::;p:-~rty m.•ncr:'l al~out

the off en:: :L ve oder o:: the Ll~1 t::!t" i?..l.
41'... ..
lift,~!.- co11gt~1
'
ting '!:Ii.. tl1 IIc':o!::eX" C~Jeruic~l n;1::l t~1e ~·;j*~:;~::-:t Cou;;t:.J
Health De_:J::>rtr:,ent, .c::o:ma o:: th<J c:·,c;-:-::ic;:;.ls ~·;c:ce truc~ed to ;u, exi~t
ing C::v~~) o·,;n2d by Hoo~cr off !~~'r.:;D f-:.:;::l~ Gl \."d. !'lea:: the.: ;10:::-th cit:{
1:. -:-1a 1% i ~::; 2.r ~' Falls. !\:: ter :::. :r:1rc~--: ir~1~ ~,-s;. l ::1 2 -Ji) CY t·1e ::-e ~j lo r:··;J3 e:d
of at th:i..!J 1-::c.:d:ion, th€ cont1·;.1c·\::or w:w a:."":..·:.t.:::cd ?.):/ !iooi~er off i-
cials t~at no rnoro would ba acce?tcd at t~~ir dun?.
/\,ftnr n~gotia ti on with the Town of Hht".a t:f ield, ;,ind ~·d. t!l t!1l~
<:ipp1·ov~l cf: tho :li.~qdr.:i · Cc1.:nty Hc::l th D~9;:irt:-.~er1t 1 th~
re:-:t.:-tinder
of th~ chc1:lical w2s"!:e w;.::s truci:od tn a 'l'o-:.;rn duD? area off ~.Jti!;h
Read in the Trn:rn of Lhcatfield.. -------
The :followir.g is n chronolo·] al su.r:-...':l:;iry of E.·vo;1tn f :corn l~~:::.-ch 15,
1968, H!1~;i th~ cher.i.icaln \·!c!.-G first encou~1tered to July 15, lSh~-iO,
t:hcn t.hc dispC•Sul Of the cr1c:r:icnls W:JS COr.lpletcd.
Date Event
~---
3-15-GB i:·'ir!>t Ci'1conntcrc~,1 chc:r;dcril w;:istc En,:yinecr• s D:i :· i-y

rn~tc=i~l hctwc~n 97th ~nct 99th Sts.
i:1 rclocn ted Fron t:ier ~~\'(!.. area.
3_::!.5-GB Cont::,cted Hoo1.:er. Che~.. Co. requc.i:; ting

in£ c .:::T:t~t:l,on on i:t.:1 tcr ia 1 r::akeup.
3-19--68 H- •
........... _.. ..:.~ ·:·L')r{]
t'"'Y1 • .: ' nrr'')-....-•-,r
t· - J; ~ ........... t .. .L 0•1"\ ··r
••... ' .. t..' - r c··o,..,-.·~1l:"li"'Cd
A~· ~- c.. •" I Cng!~or~·~ di~ry
of ste:nch cowin•J c.fr chc;:;:ical wa!ito Jc<:: C;~in'~; c~:i~.:!..-
st.ockpilr.::.
/
,,:
I -2-
I
I a Event Source
)-60 Hcsnrs. Popovici, Hnicla, Ni<igora Coui: ty Joe Cnin's di~rv

Health Dept. investigating
3-22-68 K~n Rcitneier, ·slpcrvising Soils and Hofi1o cb. tcd

l~terialo Engr., investigated and wrote 3-22-6
memo this date recommending removal of
chemical waste.
3-25-60 Hr. Po~ovic i telephoned orderinCJ chemical Joo C;:d.11' s C'li:lrV

waste excavated to dnte, removed frorn
project site and disposted of at n dump
operated by Hooi~or Chemical Co. loca tod
off Hyde Park Blvd. near north city line.
3-27-68 Letter conf irminq the telephone conver- Lett.er dat:ed

sation 3-25-60 from Ernest R. Gcacon, 3-27-60
. ~iagara County Health Dept.
4-1-68 Letter from J.P. Cain, ordering con- Lctte_r dated

tractor to r~move chemisal vaote to the 4-1-63
Hooker DUf.1? bn Hyde Park D,l 'Jid .,
., ..
4-1-GS St.imm sent letter disput:ing \·JOrk to Letter dated
removed chemical waste rr.:3.teria.l. 4-l-G3
I ---------
4-3-68 Removal of che1;1icp.l was_te to Hooker 1 a
dump siteo£f Eyde Park Blvd. began.
4-8-68 Hooker officials (Fred T. Olotka) Joe Cnin's diarv.

ordered a halt to further C!un?in<J of
--- ~
chemical waste at their Hyde Park Blvd~

dump. Uiagara county Health Dept.
informed. . .
4=-15-68 Lotter to Robert w. Sweet, Chief Eng~necr Letter dated
payment for work to remove ctpprox.

1,000 CY of chemical waste.
-·-·
from _l\. J. Kopczynski neco;;u110nding extra Ll-15-60
-~--
4-23-68 l.etter to J. P. Cain from Stimm request- Lettm: du.t~ci

ing pcrmisaion to use Town of Whe~f- 6B
field dump site. -·----
4-25-68 Maps and.boring~ received from Krehbiel, Package dated

Quay, Rugg & Hall, EniJ1:-. - Del Air 4-25-60
~----
Sul:xl iv is ion.
5-1-68 Letter to Erncat R. Gedeon, Chief Ai~ Letter dated
Pollution Control, Niagara County Health 5-1-G
Dept. from J.P. Cnin outlining proposed - · - - - - - -
method of diopo9ing of chemical waste.
,.J
,.
/ -3-
/
/ Da t e Event
/
5-3-68 Wm .. Friedman, Jr., l\sst. Comm. of . lk::io to Files
Env. Health, telephoned listing inforna- cli!tC'd 5- -C:IJ
tion he will require before ap~)roval
of Wheatfield sitn is given ..
5-6-68 Letter fror.:i Fi·icilmiJn confirrnincr tha Letter d<lted

above telephone conversation (S-3-68) 5-6-68
to Drzeninski {Stirn;"J) requcstinq per- ---··----
mission to uso \:hcatf ield dtmp ..
5-9-68 ;Letter from I!ool::e~ (Fred Olotka), Letter dated

listing m.ul:.euv of che1~ical lrnste from 5-9-68
ground 02nplcs taken. ---
5-lG-69 Boring taken on Frontier }\ve. bet'\-lean Memo dnted \
97th and 99th Sto. to determine the 5 -1 ::. -6 3 ' p.
l .tr.ii ts of chc:uic.:<l ·was to. liO~·l'1C~l1 to . T.
. p. <;~in
5-16-68 Borings of prp~o[~cd \·.;boatfiold dwnp Letter dated

s i ta nent to i;:,-ciedrnan, Hiagzi.ra County 5-lG-50, P.
Health. ~ "~·,...·.7ar'l1.·y
~~~" ~ ..... f-O
\,,..
Pricr1.-,:>~
... - ~ -··.. •• .. J
5-21-63 Verb3.l periilission received from .r. Ci:\ in' s din~:v.

Friedman granting ner~ission to use
Wheatf icld site. Lotter ordering Let.tl.":r d.::. tcd
Sti~c to cx~avatc and rcraovc chemical 5-21-6 Cain to·
was~G to Uheatfield. st .ir:-:.."'.l ~
-------
S-27-6l3 Began excavating Hheatfield durrrositc. HUP.K II dated
5-27-63·
G-6-68 Bogan hauling chemic.:ll uaste to dur;;p.
7-15-68 Complete all ·work including regrading HlJn.K. II 7-15-63

dump site.
The disposal area off Nash Road was visited on August 8, 1978 by
J. Powers, Jr., and P. Good1'.lan of rny s'caff. Although they were
unable to pin point the c::.cact location of the buried che1:1icals,
the a-pproxima to area was ex;"tminod nnd no a ign of the che.micals
·was found.. The area in wllich the chemicals \>lore buried was an 1V
excavation approxiraately 100 ft. by 30 ft. by 27 f t . deep. Th~
area is located in a Town of Hhoatf iold dunp just norci1 of the
North Tonauanda City Line, a9proximat:cly 1/2 mile east of N~:Jh
Road· and 1/2 mile Dou th of !-!iagara Fnll2 Blvd. There h&1s been
no development in the area and no apparent hnzard exints at this
time.
.J
-4-
Our rccorc!D indica tc that the cher:'licals were pl.:ice:d in the (/'
100' x 30 1 area to a depth of ap?roxinatcly 15 ft. nnd covered
wi.th at le<ist 12 ft. of the c;xcav11ted m3.terial. A rcvicu of
.Inspectors' rc::>o;:t.s indic<ltcs th7tt t!1c cstim.:::ito of 1100 cy@·---~/
chci.1icals \·rcis e;-{cr:;.:·C.cd by _about 50 p8rccnt for il total of GOO
CY :t placed in this excavation. ·, ___ ..
Dispo3al of the chemicals in the Nash Road area wan done with
tha full knowledge nnd consent of the Town of ~hcatfield and
the Niagnra County Ilcalth Dept. .Soil exploratio:.1 Ht1S conC:uct.ed
by our Soils Engineer prior to di.spo~al of the chGn.ical5 2nd
the ilren w.::is foun1 to oo nccootable
• -
for disoosnl
.a.
our~')o~;co ..
.;. I..
Attached arc copic5 of all pertineat correspondence, drawings

and boring logs.
.
DHK:JEP:rah
1\ t ta chm en ta
ii
I
! -::
L ; ___.
NIAGARA FALLS, NEW YORK 14302, PHONE (716) 285-6655
May 9, 1969
Hr J P Caine
Resident Engineer NYS D<::pt of Transportatioi"l
355 - 77th Street
Niagara Falls, New York
Subject: LaS~lle Express~ay - Ground Saoples
D-=ar !-fr Caine:
... nis letter is written in re.ply to your phone com,ersation \.:ith u.:: on
May 3rd.
s~~?:e.s of liquors taken fro~ the 97 - 99ta Streets excavatiou oa ~~~ch

15, 1968 analyzed as follows:
Specific gravity @ 2s 0 c = t.198

pH = 3.0
Loss on ignition = 86.4~
J7l ash pt ° F 130 (Cleve L_:·:d op.;:n Cl!!l)
Chlorate, Phosphorous and Fluo~ide = None
We. ':.."are able to detect small .amounts of chlorotoll!.::r.t:s, t~-.c::e. be.:-izoyl

chloride L1id approxinately 53 be.nzoic acid in this m~:eri~~-
T s2mple taken represented the worst portion of the exc~va~io~. It

W4J obtained from organic pu~dles in the vicinity of the dirt pile.
Very truly yours
/ t;_< ...~; .t~.

Fred T Olotka
Te~hnical Supervisor
sj
cc P !'1 F'riedman - Niagara County He.al th De.partm.::nt

ER Gedeon - Niagara County Henlth Department
E Padlo
J N Brogard
....
NEW YORK STAT~ GEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
54th ANNUAL MEETING
October 8-10, 1982
Amherst, New York
GUIDEBOOK FOR FIELD TRIPS IN WESTERN NEW YORK,

NORTHERN PENNSYLVANlA AND ADJACENT, SOUTHERN ONTARIO
Ed~ard J. Buehler
and
Parker E. Calkin
Editor~
Department of Geological Sciences Held in Conjunction with

State University of New York at Buffalo 11th Annual Meeting Eastern
Section American Association
of Petroleum Geologists
.Published by the New York State Geological Association. Guidebook available

from.the executive secretary: M.P. Wolf, Geology Department, Gittleson
Hall, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York 11550.
i
::
NEW YORK STATE GEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
38th Annual Meeting

April 29 - May I, 1966
GUIDEBOOK
Geology of Western New York
Edward J. Buehler, Editor
Department of Geological Sciences

State University of New York at Buffalo
Additional copies are available from the permanent secretary of the

New York State Geological Association: Or. Kurt E. Lowe, Department
~f Geology, City College of the City University of New York, 139th St.
at Convent Ave., New York, N. Y.
T. T¥illia111 La111/Je o Robert V. T¥!1itl11ar1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1969
John rViley & Sons, Inc.

New York London Sydney Toronto
Ch. 19 Soil Permeubility and Filter Requirements 287
in which Table 19.2 Classification of Soils According to Their
Cocllicicnts of Permeability
k = the Darcy coefficient or permeability
D, = some elfrctive particle diameter Degree of Permeability Value of k (cm/sec)
y = unit weight or permeant
I' = viscosity or permeant High Over 10-1
e = void ratio Medium 10-1 -10- 3
C = shape factor Low J0-3-J0-5
Very low 10- 5-10- 1
The following is an expression for the permeability or
Practically impermeable Less than 10-1
porous media, known as the Kozeny-Carman equation
since it was proposed by Kozeny and 'improved by
From Terzaghi and Peck, 1967.
Carman:
Equation 19.4 or 19.5 aids considerably in the following

(19.5)
examination of the variables affecting permeability. Jn
in which this examination those characteristics related to the
permeant are considered first and then lhose related to
k 0 = factor depending on pore shape and ratio of the soil composition are treated.
length of actual flow path to soil bed thickness
S = specific surface area Pcrmcant
Equations 19.4 and 19.5 show that both the viscosity
Since D, is defined as the diameter of particle having a
and the unit weight of the permeant influence the value
specific surface of S, Eq. 19.4 can be considered a
of permeability. These two permeant characteristics can
simplification of the Kozcny-Carman equation.
be eliminate.d as variables by defining another permeaw
bility, the specific or absolute permeability, as: ·
Table 19.1 Coefficient of Permeability of Common
Natura1 Soil Formations kµ
K=- (19.6)
y
Formation Value of k (cm/sec)
Since k is in units of velocity, K is in units of length 1 ;
----------- -----~-
e.g., if k is in cm/sec, the corresponding unit for K is
River deposits
cm 2 • K is also expressed in terms of darcys; l darcy =
Rhone at Genissiat Up to 0.40
0.987 x I0- 8 cm 2 • For water at 20°C, lhe following two
Small streams, eastern Alps 0.02-0.16
equalions permit one to convert k in cm/sec to Kin cm 1
Missouri 0.02-0.20
or in darcys:
Mississippi 0.02-0.12
Glacial deposits Kin cm 2 = k in cm/sec x 1.02 x 10-5 (19.7)
Outwash plains 0.05-2.00
Kin darcys = k in cm/sec x 1.035 x 103 · (19.8)
Esker, Westfield, Mass. 0.01-0.13
Delta, Chicopee, Mass. 0.0001--0.0J 5 Figure 19.6 is .a chart for the conversion of permeability
Till Less than 0.0001 values from one set of units to another. (Conversion
Wind deposits factors are given in the appendix.}
Dune sand 0.1-0.3 While viscosity and unit weight arc the only variables
Loess 0.001 ± of the permeant that influence the permeability of
· Loess loam 0.0001 ± pervious soils, other permeant characlt:ristics can have a
Lacustrine and marine offshore major influence on the permeability of relatively imw
deposits pervious soils. The magnitude of inlluence for characw
Very fine uniform sand, teristics other than viscosity and unit weight are illustrated
U" = 5-2 0.0001-0.0064 in Fig. 19.7. Jn this figure values of permeability of
Bull's liver, Sixth Ave., N.Y., saturated kaolinHe are plotted for various permeants.
u = 5-2 0.0001-0.0050 The permeability is expressed in terms of the absolute
Bull's liver, Brooklyn, U = 5 0.00001-0.0001 permeability, thus the influences of viscosity :)nd unit
Clay Less than 0.0000001 weight have been eliminated. The data in Fig. 19.7 show
that the nature of the permeart can be very important,
" U = uniformity coefficient. with variations of many hundred percent in absolute
From Terzaghi and Peck, 1967. permeability depending on the act11al permeant. The
Protection of.
Environn1ent
btO
.......
PARTS 190 to 399

Revised as of July 1, 1983 ·
CONTAINING
A CODIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS
OF GENERAL APPLICABILITY
AND FUTURE EFFECT
AS OF JULY 1, 1983
With Ancillaries
Published by
the Office of the Federal Regisler
Nalional Archives and Records Service
General Servicu Adminislration
a$ a Special Edilion of
the Federal Regisler
,_. _______:..:,.....:;::,.:.~, ~. ·.::·;::.·:~ . . .-_·:.:.---.~-:...::::=::--.:..·.===---=~ :::=:::=::::::::::::::=:::::::.::-:;·.:.·_
• w~"""":;I!-......... -1"-,.:.. -~'"I.'"! - - - - - - " ' : ' '"'----;',•
·:-~• .... . '-:-7 •.. ~;t'~·-;:-:·,-"T"l'*--.~.~-~:...t~~=-"!.....:0.::;r_ .. _ ...,..
"• "~. • • ; ... .h- .
\,
• .. :. ... - - - - · - - - - ·--
•
'-·..----....-----i..----.-- r--- ·r• -: .... ·-.. -~

-a
c
:l
•. w
0
~,;~· _o
>
"O
"?
)>
"1
I
0)
co
0)
l
j
.I
I
..i
I :=!
I II)
I \.• 0, J>,
I
i " . 0
':::" \ !
-I
'•
1·
;
,. .. :0
c
i '.
~
'--- ~'<, ~ •.
'._~
''\ ~-~:..':"";"':" . "
:
I
i
ti
~
o'
::I
Sowrc•t .. iflifell heflUanc}' Atle• of tN l.Pn1Ud State•, 1'•chntcel P•p•r Mo .. 40, U.I. Depu·taent of ec-erc•,
U.S. c;c,..,er•ent Print.ift& Office, W:•ehiftat.on., ».. C.. , l96l. ·, ,. 0
m
::i
::... .
0
Figure 8 ::I
i,
3
ft>
l-Year 24-Hour Rainfall (Inches)· a
...
........ -.. ·---··--
-,~,---~l!"~"t:·-- • •i: w· ~- ~_., _ _ . ..,_.,. __ .,.,.,, ............. - - - · ••· ~
")
"!I
c.
::+
w
0
.o
.,,>
"?
>
0)
-:J
0)
::1
;:;-
J:.
0
'.P
- .,, s..
t•
'
r--Ji g
-
'""
Sourcei Climatic Atlas of the United States, U.S. Department of

Center, Ashville, N.C., 1979.
Comm~rce, National Climatic
,,, -
0
:i
~·
0
Figure 4 •'' ~ " :i
.'· t.. , ... · r f' • '
Mean Annual Lake Evaporation (In Inches)' "·i: a"'=

....<.;.•' .,
n
,.~ "'~.
'•.t,"i,
.I. .,.,; .."Ii'"'. IJ I':~
~
'r " ;·
; /.:.;:,I ,.f,"'f" ••• ' :•
.• - - - ' • ':!"
c
%'''~••<j·!..r. •,,.,-.
--~/•
. ,, •
: ,\f\· .• .. ' . '. - - :. - . -· _::_
I
~··
l 1 .:_ . .:':.:. , ..
;"" "··-/' . • • 11· ii· -.J.-;. . •• - • - \'"' . .. 1!.
, ' -1. 0 •.- • • - - , •' . • ', '-' • • '' ..."'
~;.~
.ss ~-;·~' . . ,...-~
I' '•" .·r."•.'?l,.
' ' • I "I'' . • . ..
1'·.. · · · ·A.l,,.,.0_, r , .. , '·
·\:);.'\.~~- ,.,.,,,J,,...• c""l ,~---~
-1
' -<'.. .,-"'!.r""'w
T"' • -,, . .-p/J>''>.
'-':'° .....
, .. .. ;:,., T,,, I' · -....
· ... '., • • • ' •'"1
/'·~:=. .;. :, .~~~ ·~~; 1::·:-.:. -· \ c .,...·.::~.:~·· . . ::....

jO: • ._, _. • ,•-•, • "' '
•....;;:·. •·. . 1·"""• '"ii. •..•. .t,;... ' rr. • " ,_. • ' • . .
I: . . ·,,- """'.....•' :·1''W'°*'"
·It-)-1.~~~C:<> t·.., ~-tp.r'ii:f'F~"': ~- U:'.~ · ·o /, ·~_
f\.
V r "• , •' , ef'. :i
'-<,·".'.: .:- c. • . / .. ,•....:.:.
.., ,,\~~I' . ~.
.. . . ·• . · . . . . ;r;c?::<.0 ·'
~ '~.,,..,. . ... ~~··
;./.:. ....'14).;;~::, -j ~.-·:~·-~--.
. '·'~"" ···~-""· , .. -~;·?.~
" 0
.. ......~ . __ , •.,.
. •V > " " ,,.,, •.,
... •
. . -· •
......... .
·.'.°' ,.;:.\. 3 ' '· ' J. -' • " '
1•
• I
:i
~~·-..\. i··.,~_.·,.~....'/:"t. ~,.iV;.,.:~l'·=·(.i;:..

•'" .,., • '-' •.," "' ' _., • •' ..._, '1::1 • ' ., " • IC" '''
• ,lJ-,..,. .. ,.,,._,. • .... , ' . .,.. ,, - . "I • .... ,. .... · ' '"·' • II>
,. -l""''i~;-~~"i--
1 0"' ··;,;,.-:;· ..... ·. ,,.; ." .· ;:!.':;:,../ . ::::
·::~:i, ~~~~·~~,".:;:(,/~~Ji.OJ;,
•'''~'" /1!))¢""';,_'/'i?
~!:'\~" ;.- .c.,~ [.
~;.!. •--:J·•-:"'°';'<·· ·,;\J':;-J'.:..i.·•~fl ~
';. :;,.,.. ... ••· J.., v : ..
..., .•. /
~Jr;~, ~"),r
\
~ ~.i,Irr ;~·.. .-.:;';l\.,!2.l(ci,"~

~\\f'::i.'·~· p~l J.
•,:: ...... ,• >J .", ",.'&' "'_'' f_• ,,_ )• • • • ,' ' I ,__,...., .(. .,,., ;;':!) .f
·. ,.. t ' • -. .. -· . \..'.-.. . . ,
I ··,
', . .:;.\;> -·.• .1"r"'--:7l
)I. :.:J,,. .... ..
"'Ii
·-~·· .. - ' ~·~· ~.-::or."'' ~ ~'-~~·•·-~:;,r.·

· 1 ... . .':1. • 0
•-i
-:~...,,; "'l~.ff~ ; . ...,.. ~,.-
II\,.,' .. f' 1 :•
''· I • ' ... . /-
~
~'\>-,.
J ' ,.,
ct
~ •)-~~':et i
.fe. '·. ..
Ji"·; «-'!\ .L _. · .-"O !"' 'J.J•·"-- r r ,- , ' ( '..'.i'
,~'\.. • ,r' I·_ , -.,. ' .)·f'-- ,., ' [..~ ' • -.r-·..... """" '""'
1
• • '• '\ ,"'I :'"i _,L_ .. •• .•' •' j . .: .. "•·r • • ;;·
) !fl . u •-;.' .'
"'A;•:,-.:.1~...J.,I""'
. .."'-;'-"' ;;..._"V,';t.:;-'•
....·r..J•)\•n,..-:9..'i'.:i(~{·] .~--~":S4 -~ ~-
I · .. ._.. -.!> • , ,\ j,I). / :I
·: f,.
h "i(l>f l' - •,
C'l
>
. ,•II,·.-/>.., 1.,,
, 1l
I ' ''
( "!"'""--·
,:-)
1 ;;;. ,,,r
..;:/"'""' c.o>
"\": - I. •
....,.;~-·· ,. .~" · -~~·1··':-·H1,'). ~,.,... ..... •-;•1 '.'11t '---.~'\:?·
-:i •
:.,n " ' " ' I /"\)-1;1-•.::J,
·r-i-.-•;. /:,, ,.•".....,.._·: --- •' , .z
·- '\'.u(·· ,..:'"'!
,':.. c:-· - - __
-:i
"',.,
~
:;,
I
"' , ~ . " .
----~ I"/ )
- -~ • ,.-.:=.-•
· . ,_,.-11.l'· •
. I,•/ :1-.:/·'-·~ .l ~.J·
.,.,. "<
.)'I>.\ .•. (··~-~ "' .i. f·0~- /"''\~~-·

i'i:·,... • . -.,,~.\,·
!\_ l .......
' .. I' //-
• .;.,·:· .r;· ;...,.----.. .I,0;:?)J
.'· .
I . ,, ~ ~ .~ -~
I ' :·... ..~.:_ , ..,;.....i,', ' -
:..:;::-
r·.
,.j . I
t •
. .. .., ... , . I
ri •. • \~ -\.~ . ;,%~ ~· -~·~- .,~

~'
. . \ ,. ·, '.'"· _.,. _,,,,,, j ·. '. '
'-1,~:,.'?__2:;.·
' - ~~·:;~-,
. .- \ •• . • • • • • • • •• ' ' • ( I
.-~x:.;•.'w>
--:f/"'c~~::· • • .. · · """'t~i'I. '''"' ~"'!;
- .,-.-:·""·~. ~ ~:
:'.;.:"'.=..:J... . . . . °-'"iJ :I
.I. ·"......~.. #"'.-?.J. -::,...,.-.'f"':·
. .. .,,,;ti..::: --;,~'.!.' ~-=---.!.!..._-.
.<zi. - ---·-
•
o.;:·L. - : ' •. • -:;;-- • -.
::.;..\:#
.::..··
ChUU ·"-!! :':.:.-:.!: I
HolU..,1•11: • .... llC•l••11
::·!:.:::.~-· -··~ I
~
I ~,J' =· ,~~
i •...
M~ "'!~~-~• ·~H :1 f
"'Ii
c
~~· ~ ·~"!.:· .• ..:·-r
:: .-• ·- ':"
... •. , .. l ·-·..
< ••
!.' i% 1~"1Jf~:.-1:f: I ! ~f
... ' , ••1.'>
• . ·
.• .
I'
-·
. • •• -~<.: .
:.... . -- ••, •
.::.__.-:.,)-.: -
.
I
· ·l' - ....L
I
·........ •.....•.. +., _,:.:
fx.:!f 1•1
=t:· l
-. .
M\ft•K•IM tlH ...

- .... I•\.+,._ ... ~4".
.. ~" . .!.A-n~_,
iI
--••:J ~
. • ....•.·- -·-·- -::
:i.
w
0
.o
lourcat IDM.tlc At la• c! th• lm1t•d Stat••• U.S • .O.part•nt of ~re•, tll•Uon-.l CliMtic C.nt•r,.
... 1' ') A•ti.•1l1«. N.t •• 1979. . >
"::J
Figure. S "P
Normal Annual Total Precipitation (inches) ,..
5.
Niagara County DOH, 1981
NAME OF LANVF I I. L
- - - - · ---·---
NIAGARA SAN1TATION CO/.IPANY IVEC ~932054)
l.OCATJON ·
Tf1e. .b.ite. Lt> ut.lmat<'.d to be. al>out .&even ac.JlU .in .oi.ze. and
.f.ocate.d 11011.:th 06 :the. N.i.agaJla 1.fofiaw/2 ea..6e111ent wf1.i.ch .&t.11.addlu :the. No.11.t.h
Tonawanda - M1eat61ei.d town ..e . i.ne.. The. .&ite. extend.& 611.om :the. eMte11.J1 end 06
tl1e. acce~.& 11.oad Jiunni.ng 611.0111 NMf1 Road aµp.11.oxi.matc.1'.y 350 yMd-O eMt :tJJ tl1e.
60111i .i.n :the. po1t>Vt {!_(L,~einent (Towe.Ji #365). The. .o,ite. .i..-0 utima.te.d :to be. 120 yMdJ..
wide. a.t :the. wutvui ei1d tape.11. .i.ng :to about 70 ya..li.d-O w.i.de at .the. eMte.Jin <'.J1d.
Tfte. .fandb.if.1'. location and e.x:teJ1t a11.e. .&f1own on ::t11e. attached

dJtaw.ing.
OWNERSHIP
HISTORY
. T'1.i.-0 f.ru1d 6.f.1'.1'. WM u-0ed by the Ni.aga..li.a SanLtat.i on Company
6oJL WMte. d-UpoMi. 611.om 1964 to 1968. The. )(e.611..1.>e. .o,ite. 1HM u..&ed 6oJt both
.indMt.11..i.al. and 11J.1n.ic-i.pal. M!.. 6n-0e.. The. .o,ite. .Ji.e.cuve.d .Ji.e.61t-Oe. 611.om N.<aga11.a Fall.1.>
Abt. fo.11.ce. BMe., Be.1'.l Ae.11.0.&pace., Ca.Ji.bo)(undum, F.Jtontie.11 Chein.icai, Gllaph.i.te.
Spe.daltiu, Conti.11ei1.t.a.1 Can and G11i..e.6 B110.&. Wa/.rtu d.i..1.>po.&e.d 06 may .<11cfLLde.
cau.&tic..1.>, pf.ailng tank ~udge. ru1d rran.i.c.ipal. WMtu.
H.i.-0:to.Jt . foai. iJiooMrati.on WM ob.t.cUne.d 611.om l/aza11.do1~~_QJa.ote.

V.i..1.>po.&al. S-i.tu .in New Yo.Ji.k State, Volume. 3, NYS VEC.
Q
INVESTIGATION
A .o,ite. v.l.o..f..t WM made by W1.. M. E. Hoplzi.n.1.> o 6 .the. N..i.aga11.a
County Health Ve.paJ1tmei1t on June 11, 1981. The. .o,ite. WM 6ou.nd :to be. poo11.f.y
cove.11.e.d wi.::t11 p.11.otJiud..f..ng )(e.6u.1.>e.. Vi..o,ible .i..te.m!:. included 1wbbe.11. block.&, .tu:;JU>
a11d llo.&u, t:hcu, c.onc...Jie.t:e 6Jiagme.n:Ui and o.tl1V1. demo.f.-i.tion deb.Ji..i.&, b.11.ofz en
glM-O, a.011, wood, Jiu~ted can..o and p..i.e.cu 06 911aphi.te. .Ji.od.o. Af..oo 601111d wVce.
wl1a.t appeMed to be. .Ji.e.mnant..o 06 .1.>:te.e.l dizwM. Tlivze. WM e.v.<.de11ce 06 .oome
una11tl10)(,f.zed dwnp..i.ng a6tVt the. ).;.{te. WM clo.oed. Accu.t. to ::tJie. ..&i.te wa.-6 not
11.ut.11..<.cte.d.
Re.d-b.11.ow11 (11.u.&t-co.f.011.ed) -0tain.& we.11.e. 6ou.nd on vege..t~on and
-00.i..l .in numeJ1.01u.:. f.oca.tion.o Mound ;fJ1e pvi.-i.me..tVI. 06 .the. ..M..te., pMU<'_ufM.f.!J a..t.ong
:tl1e. no)(tl1e.11.n and wutvi.n e.dgu. Add..f...t1.onal. ~ta.lne.d rt'1.e.a...6 we.11.e. 6ou11d :tJ111ougl10ut
.the ma.Ji.-Oh u and o.t.h Vt low po.i.nu w..f..::t11..i.n ::t11 e. ..&i.te.. Al:though mo-Ot o 6 ::t11 ue
-0tai.J1e.d rt'1.e.a...6 wVte. d.11.y, two rt'1.e.M wVte 6ound bei1eath .otru1di.J1g wate.11. It WM
note.d tl1a.t although .the. g)(ound WM .&taine.d be.ne.a.th :tl1e. watVt, .the. wa:te.Jt WM not
d.i..1.>cof.011.e.d. No 6.f.ow..f..ng le.acliate -Oi:Jz ea.mt> we.11.e. 6ow1d. The. .1.>aJ19Jf...i.n9 we.if. wM not
6ound on the June. 11..tlt v.i....M..t. A we..f.l WM 6ound on Jw1e.19.tl1 on a. .&ub.&equei1t
v.i..&i.t. The. well. WM located 20 6eet ea..ot 06 N..f..a9a11.a Mohawll TowVt tt363. The.
location 1..o .&lwwn on ::tJie. a:ltache.d d11.aw.i.n9. The we.U had a.ppa..li.ent.1y been
... ' ~ ...
6.
INVESTIGATION {c.ontinuedJ
.vandalized. The upp<Ui .6tandp1.pe luuJ been b11oken 066 at g1tou11d level ru1d the.
well had, t11<Uie60Jt.e., been f.e6t w1c.ov<Uied. Tl1e well m~y .6U.1l be u.oeabl'e.. 60.1t
.&ampl.i.ng.
No ev.idenc.e 06 .f.ru1dfl.i_l.f_ ac.uvLtlj 1JM 110.ted e.Mt 06 NfogaMi
1
Moliawk Tow<Ui #1365. Howe.v<Ui, USDA aeJt.ial p110.tog11npli.& IARE 3V-75; 1966) .ind-frate.
tl1aA:. the la;1d6ilf.ed aJt.ea. may extv1d 300 :to 400 6t. "-<l..6t 06 ToweJt. 11365.
SOILS
The. -60ii.-6 -6tVLJt.01111d.ing :the. -61..te. aJt.e. Raynham and Cmrnnda).gua.
-6<Ui-ie..& .&oil.&. The. c.ompo.6-iuon o 6 .tJ1e -60-ll c.on:tni11ed w.itl1 tl1e. -6.i.te i.;t,~e16 -i-6
not lrnocvn, a1tl1ough .l:t. J.....& expected :to be f.a.Jigely c.ompo.&ed 06 Jze.6u.&e. The
.6uJr. 6ac.e .l.6 g en<Uialf.y a. .6-il:ty c.lay ma.t<Ui.i.al w.ith .6ome .&and ..i.n .&pot.&. . PoJt.tion.6
06 :the 4.{.te a.Jie m.v1..&hy wl1-Ue otl1eJt..6 appea.Ji well d.Jia.ined, .ind.i.c.aling tlia.t :the .
.&oil may not be wi.i.6oJt.m tlv1.ougliout tl1e .6-ite. Bo'1-lng Jzec.oJid.6 06 the .6ampl.i.ng
well .i.mmed-la.tely .60Uth 0 6 tl1 e ute, .lnd.i.c.ate a pJi.o Mle 0 6 .-!:>ilt:y /.,and and .-6tmdy
ult tD a depth o 6 about 9 6ee.t oveJt. cfa.y to an u.11l211ow11 depth. The '1eeoJt.d-O
al.60 -0l10w :the wa.t<Ui :t.abf.e a,t 4 6eet. Tlzi..-0 ..M1gge.6U that :t11e wateJt. table may
be. p<Uic.hed. Fluc.t:aalion..& 06 :the. wat<Ui :table a.Jie. not lwottwi.
CONCLUSIONS
The. po.t<mtial 601t :tl1 e m.i.gJzation o 6 c.onta1ninru1t.6 o 66-ute. -l-6
pJi.uent. V-i-6.ib.ee. le.ad1a.te ..t;:tain-0 and tl1e. odoJt .in tl1e well .6ou:th 06 tl1e .eru1d6ill
ind.le.ate that ma.t<Ui.io.1 may be. le.adi.ing in p<Uid1ed gJroundwateJt.. Pvrnie.able ..t;oil.&
in .6ome aJt.eM could allow lat.Vial m.i.g.tiailon. The ute. Jreq1U.Jiu pJt.op<Ui c.lo.t,.i.ng.
; The. p'1.oximi:ty 06 hotL.6e..& along Fo'1be..6 Road and po.ten.tial 60.1t migJiation ju.6U61J
,; :t>ampl-lng at tl1.i-6 ute..
SAMPLING
Well and .&oil ..6amplu we.tie :fi1.l2en 601t. THO, l1e.avy metal-0 and
phenol aY1alyili. 1t WM 11.ote..d at the. time o 6 -Oampling, tliat :the wa.tVL dJra.JJ..m 6Jrom
tlie.. well WM d..i.oeotoJz ed gJiay a.nd -!>Viongly odo.tiou..6 uii..th an 01r.ga11i..c. odoJr. A
.6l-lght oily .&11 e en 1.{)(L6 plL uent on :t11 e ~L'1 fiac. e. o 6 t.h e .&runp.f e.. Two -60-i.t -!>ampt e-6
w<Uie. taken ne.a.Ji. Tow<Ui..6 11364 and 11365. Tl1ue.. ..6amplu wvr.e. tahe11 fi1tom the bot..tom-6
06 hand aug<Uied hole.& .ti.oughly 4 6eu deep. T11e boJring neo.A pole. #364 ..indiea,ted
a gJt.ay -OLf.t ov<Ui a. da.tik<Ui 9Jray .-!:>ilty.clay lay<Ui at tl1e. po-int 06 -!>amp-l'i.ng. The
..6ec.ond bo.ti.lng .6fwwe.d a. tan ulty c.iruJ ov eJt. c..f.ruJ at about 4 6e.e.t. The ..t;mnpl e.
WM taken 6Ji.om tl1.l.6 .lnteJt.6ac.e. G'1ow1dwateJt. wa.-6 enc.ount<Uied .oV.gll:tly below tl1e..
4 6oot level in both 110£.u.
RECOMMENVAT1 ONS
Thu u.te rru/..it be pJropeJt..fy c.lo.-!:>e.d. Additional .6amp..l',fog weli..6

along the. NfogaJt.a Moho.1th eMement would be. dultie.able.. to 6aeif.i..tate.. 6uttvie.
..6ru11p..l'.i.11g. Tlie. e.u.6ting well .1.:ihoufd be maintained. Annual -li1-0pec.tion and p<Ui.i.od.i.c.
moni..to'1.i.n9 .i..6 Jiec.ommended. The. Town 06 fJ.ll1e.a,tM.eld WM noti.6.{ed tD ..M1bmit an
abatement plan 6oJt the. ute. • .
(}'
AJ'r'EIJDJ X 1
Page 2
SUJ.IMARV OF SAMPLES TAKEN
---·-·~-.~--·-------·----~--
NEAREST
SAMPLE II LOCAT10N
--·····~~-
TYPE PARAMETER
----~----
VATE --~-
HOUR
.. 1 G11a;.twic.lz. II J3 {tlell Metaf-0 7/J6/81 J1:00
2 GJi a.tw.f.c.k II 10 ltleff. Meia!-0 7/J6/81 11:00
3 GJzatwic.k II 11 lt'e1'1 Metaf-0 7/16/8J Jl:OO
4 GJiatw.i.ck II 12 Well 1.1 e.t.af J.i 7/16/8J 11:00
5 G'l.aiw.lc.k II 13 (I) elf THO 7/16/81 11:00
6 G11a.twic.k II JO Ctlef1 THO 7/J6/8J 11:00
7 GJza.twi.c.k II 11 (tie.ff nw 7/16/81 11: 00 .
8 G11 atwi ck II 12 ftlef.l THO 7/16/8J 1J:OO
9 I Hi~y.~§@Ft4t:Jo11"".~ lt'ef.f.' Meial-0 7/16/81 1:00
10 ·?Jza:. Sanitation i ftlef.f THO 7/16/81 1:00
11 , Z-i.mmvunrut We.f.f THO 7/16/81 12:00
12 1l t1iy·
. l O.f.d Fafl-0 (tie.fl THO 7/J6/81 J2:00
J3 AJz.tpaJik LendwX.e 1.1 e.tal J.i 7/17/8J J2:00
J4 AJztpa.Jzk Leacfw;te THO 7/17/81 12:00
75 PASIJY Soil I.I e;t_af J.i 7/21/81 10:00
16 PASNY So.if TllO 7/21/81 10:00
17 N{ <L. San;ltail6it Soi.1 Me.t.af-0 7/24/81 12:00
18 tJ.J,fo; · sanLtailoii : Soil THO 7/24/81 12:00
19 N.ia.· ·sanitation·' So.ti. 1.1 e_f_af.J.i 7/24/81 12:00
20 lJia.·: .saj1I.tailon 1 So.{1 THO 7/24/81 12:00
21 (tlafck Road Soil THO 7/24/81 12:00
22 GJza;Qo..i.c.k II 13 We.ff Phe.nol 8/12/81 10:00
23 GJza.tw.ic.k II JO We.ff Ph rJ10.t 8/12/81 10:00
24 GJza;tiv..i.c.k II 11 Well Pl1enol 8/12/81 10:00
25 Gfla;Qu.i.c.fa. II 12 Well Phe.nol 8/12/81 10:00
26 Z..i.mmVLman {I) elf Phenol 8/12/81 11: 00
27 Old Falf-0 IVeff Ph eJ10l. 8/12/81 11:00
28 [Ufa:' _SQY1i.tailon t:2£.f. Pli eJ1of 8/12/81 12:00
29 Ofin-1 nd11-6bz..i.al Soil THO,TOC 9/07/81 12:00
IJ.leld.i.ng t.i.ndane.
AT'PUJDJ X 1
PAGE 3
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SAMPl_ES TAKEN AT GRATW1CK - R1VERS1VE PARK
WELL ti 10
Sample ti 2 Sm11ple.d 11: 00 7/16/81
Cadmium, total L.T. 0.02 f.fG/L

ChJJ.omium, ;fotnl. L. T. O. 1 MG/ L
Lead; .trJ ta/. L. T. O• 1 MG IL
MVI. cu Ji y , .trJ ta! L. T. 0. 4 MCG/ L
Nic..kle, total 0. 05 J.fG/L :
Srunpl. e ti 6 Sa.mp£ e.d 11 : 00 7/16/81
THO 35 MCG/L
Sample #24 Sampled 10:00 8/12/81
Phenol. 3 ~.iG/L
£tJE LL Ii 11
Sample II 3 Samp£ e.d 11: 00 7/16/81
Cadmlum, wtnl. L.T. 0.02 MG/L

Ch Ji omlwn, :tfl tn.1. L. T. 0. 1 MG/L
Le.a d, .trJ tal. L. T. 0. 1 MG/L
MV1.c..uAtJ, wtal L. T. 0.4 MCG/L
Nic..kle; :tn:t111. L.T. 0.05 MG/L
Q
.Sample II 7 Sampled 11:00 7/16/81
THO Le..oJ.i than 1 MCG/L
.Sample II 25 Srunpled 10:00 8/12/81

Pfl enol 3 MGIL
11.JEL L ti 12
Sa.mpie # 4 Srunple.d 11: 00 7/16/Sl
Cadmium, t.o tLJ..1 L. T. 0.02 MG/L
ChJJ.omfom, total L.T. 0. 1 J.!G/ L
Lead, w ta1. L. T. 0.1 J.fG/ L
MVl.CJ.Vtlj, wtal L. T. 0.4 MCG/L
Nic..kle, t.o:t_a! LT. 0.05 J.!G/ L
Sample It 8 Sampte.d 11: 00 7/16181

THO 4 J.fCG/L
Scwple # 26 Sampled 10:00 8/12/81

PhenolJ.i 0.2 J.fG/L
Al'l'f/JD1X 1
PAGE 4
R1VERS1VE PARK lcontinuedJ
WELL ti 13
Sample. II 1 Sampled 11: 00 7/16/81

Cadmium, :totnl L. T. 0.02 MG/L
Clv1.omfom, totnl L. T. 0.1 /.!GIL
l e..ad, total. 0. 1 MG/ L
J.f VzC11A:!f, :total L. T. 0.4 f.fCG/ L
N-ickle., total. 0.05 J.!G/ L
Sample. II 5 Srunple.d 11: 00 7/16/81

THO 18 MCG/L
Sample.. ti 22 Sampled 10: 00 8/12/81
Phenol-0 17 MG/L
Sample. II 9 Srunple.d 1: 00 7/16/81

Cadmium, t.otnl L. T. 0.02 MG/L
C/iJi.ominm, :total L.T. 0.1 i!G/L
Lead, to:tal 0.2 MG/L
Mvi CWl!f , ;tf) :tal L.T. 0.4 MCG/L
N.i.ckle., :total 0. 12 MG/L
Sample. If 10 Sampled 1: 00 ·' 7/16/81
THO 4 MCG/L
Sample II 28 Sampled. 12: 00 8/12/81
Phenol 0.008 MG/L
---··
rso1r SAMPLES·'
Samplu If 17,18,19 & 20 alt Sampled 10:00 7/24/81
Sa.mplu II 17 & 18 Met.al.-6 - Ruuiu no:t yet:. available.
Sample II 19 LT. 10 PPB THO
Sample II 20 l. T. 10 PPB THO
I .
I
API 'f/JfJJ X 1
PAGE 5
RESllLTS OF SAMPl.ES TAKEN AT ARTPARK
LEACHATE SAMPLES ·
-----~-~·~---
Sample II 13 Samp.f.ed 1: 00 7/17/81
Cadmium, .total 0.02 MG/L

Clviomium, :to:to.l 0. 1 J.!G/L
Lead, :total. 0.5 J.lG/ L
Ni.ck.le, :totill 0.73 MG/ L
/,{eJ!Cttll!J 1 :(otai_ L. T. 0.4 J.lCG/L
Sample. II 14 Sampled 1: 00 7/17/81
THO 47 MCG/L
RESULTS OF SAMPLES TAKEN AT llOL1VAY PARK
WELL SAMPLES
WELL II 4
Sample II 11 ( U.mmVlnun J Samp.f.ed 12: 00 7/16/81
THO 4 MG/L
Samp.f. e II 'l 6 . Sampled 11: 00 8/l'l/81
Phenol.& .008 MG/L
!tJE LL II 8
Sample ti 1'l l Old Fall.& J Sampled 1'l: O0 7/16/81
THO 3 MCG/L
Sample ti 27 Sampleif 11 : 00 T 8/12/81
Phenol • O1 J.fG/ L
SOIL SAMPLES
Sample ti 21 Wal.ch Road Sampled 12:00 7/24/81
THO Le...6.6 :than 10 PPB

7.
l_'. NIAGARA SAN ITA 1-JON

N ASJ--i R0A D S -T-f__ · J
(Dl=.C # 93205'+)
Appro~. 5~4/e.
I: 3(;00
(A// J,.}ft,t::,eJ g5f • .r;,,.fcJ)
'
lo..
~
(jl ·-·/t)Dr.J6 A1eq ""'"
~ Tre.e. /11)~ ...J

.._
""C"
I-
It Pou-er- J 111 CJ
•
!!
'
<
UJ
Q
L f!~d • ~ ,."7W11 L~ ... ,kvfe -
V ',
UJ
S fu/4..)
j
V)
'
I
. UJ
~-~
•
I
I
_j· I
oY'~~o~~
S/ope - Jowl} warJ toward 5£ ( ( /%) _J~
OU,
f) t;f! !J"
\jl i
Lui_
~ ,··
((:::. k~ 0 :
(,~/J · ob.>e..r'-'qf/orJ !f~' kil~ Q

fiJapped [roni I I , ri
O/lly by Iii. /lop k 1n.s Ne HD IQ
~
L - - J
tf/,,,;/~ f4'?4~"? i '-.

:Z:~--
- ----··- ·----- -·-- - ----·-----·----------· I J
I' -,
' ..
_____________ /llfJ. S_H __ 8 Of!Q ______ ______J _~-- --·
~··
7.
l_ .. NIAGARA SAN ITATJON

NA S /-i ROA D S J-T-f __ ·
( Dl:C # 93205'+)
Appro~. 5~.:c/e.
1: 3000
(A JI J,.} fc,/.r.~1 0.5 f, -";,)eel)
(}I ·-·/11lr.Sh Areq
~ Tre:.e. /11)1!
If Po u-e.r- J 111 u
L f?e..d. ~ rcu;n Le.,, '1v/~
S fu//1J
(11 a pre:. cl {ro171. (,~/J · ob.se.rvq f,"/J

O/fly by If/ . ii 0 pk I fl.5 Nc HD
• ~;,,;J..,Jz, ~~""
\
I USGS 1982
·-
.
·"-.
.,, ~. :.
.l .• .f ~ .
.. j .
.. .
·-: r :! :- ; :: . .· , ~.
.
,- ...
·.:. ,·.. . :·· .... I . . .. -: • •·:· '· .·
I
I
. :. . -
' . t ..: ... -
-.... The geology of the site consists of a Holocene lacustrine c1ay unit
overlying_ a l1edrock of Camillus Shale. Four test Lori ngs were dril Jed on the
::
site and their locations are shown in figure J. The geologic description of
D the.borings is as follows:
Wel 1 No. ~~pth (ft) .
0 5.0 Fill.
5.0 6.5 Clay, pink.
WATER SAMPLE: 6.0 ft.
2 0 8.0 Clay, tan to 11ght green, sandy, dry.

8.0 JO.O CJ ay, green.
)o.o ) 1.5 Clay, pink.
SOTL S.~!·IPLE: 8 - JO ft.
0 1.5 Tan and black fill.

1• 5 3.5 Clay, greenish, sandy, dry.
3.5 7.0 Clay, greenish, sandy, wet.
SOIL SAMPLE: 7 ft.
0 1.0 Topsoil.
1.0 3.5 Clay. sandy. dry.
3.5 6.5 Clay. greenish, wet.
SOIL SAMPLE: 6.5 ft.
1I
..
.------- ---- -~~--~-
\-
IU
.... :,
~
.. Ill !
- lL . .. . -:;; .....~.
"?.~ 't. ~
I.
..
o-
:r ...
:~
..•
. , ...
.
-
.'\,
. ., ,·
.·
.~
.
)
-;-....
-t-
'loo
0 I)
.
- - -
-9
·.:r
!:)...
e
CL
__./;
v
¢
"
.::t:
c··
el
0 _:;
d
2
...,
"' -~
::>
0
:s:
qJ
......
. c
- Jt E
....... y
......., L
VJ
\I
()
co_ l•_J +_,,
\)
VI
.f-.
l!J
<Q
re
' 0 - p-
~
0
!L I
I
Q.I ())
D' c.}-
c ....
t1 -
~· c 0
L
0
- i;
:2. _.l)
<_J
q_
°';>(
-. - -- 1-.
a
--;1 ~D
3
c. ~
~
v
IU V> _J
0
0 ) .
Ga
--·----·--·--- I
d
t.)
-----~·· ---··----
~
t;{)
:I tC
;I
1 PQTENTlAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITC::
· l:"'J., 1-nA
,;, f:1-r-\. SITE JNS?ECTlON. iiE?ORT
PARTt-S1TELOCAT10H-ANO INS?C::CTION INFORMATlONo
I 11. SIT; ~AME ANO LOCA TIOH-
_ _ UNKNOMI
04 ;.C;C_'<C'f PO:.."!FCRMlNG ~-:->c.-. (C,._..,"""' '°""'ff
,,. Q "-.er.-. ciC3". E?ACCNTRACTCR . Engi_neerin~9_!el}_~~ CT C.. .YUNK:;?.A.L C: ~ MUNJCF.AL~NTRACTCA .._ _ _~---------
0 ESTATE" ~F.STATECCNTRACTORJ?arnes & Moore a·aarMB:: t"~""""·
,;;,_,.,,.;~~~ ----------------·~
-~1
01o~r.q,. .::11 Tl:'...£.?'"CNE. l-0.

Engineering
John Kubarewicz Chemical Engineer 703/591-7575
Science
cg OTt-lE.."l L"<S?<::C1"CRS 10 rau:. t l CRG..V-.1.L~ncA 12 •-=LS"'H'.:NE.NO.
Art Seanor Geologist Dames & Moore 315/638-2572
,_____ --------------···--·~------+----------------------
I )
I II !.
'
I II } -·-
I I, )·
t :J .srrc: ~""'flA TI\/'eS ""7'E..=NlE;"'N6)
Ed Greinert
!------------------ - - ---------+------------------
~. 14TITI..E.
City Superviso'"
1~~ESS.
Wheatfield !'Id ~l·: "N.E!<l.
I I
I, ,
I I ( l
lT~~SJE!Y
,(......,.ct&~
I 1 ::i we,,.. '11E.'l c::;"'°'nc+<S
I
xi ~.MISSCN< sunny
C W"'r'RAI'«
IV. !HF-ORJ.AA TICN J..VAIUBLE rROl.t
I
1~~)~~~770
01 c:xrJ.CT _ 02CF !_,.~
Ernie Schroeder Engineering Science

o;~~:~:~~~: ~:~ 5 '~-:c,k.Si':;<:,;£-Co-:~=,o:::,CN::-:-::;:.c:=RM-:-:-----:cr""·5;-~:-=,_~:.c;;r=-----:1-;::~-:-a-::-cm::cRC>MZA::-~-S=-&-=n-=cM-NO-O-r_e_..,......c_~_,i=-=--~-;-~--;-~-~-~-2-5-7~2__ c~ac-:CA:-:-c-;:~::::-c~-,...-,-~-:.--r,:-.,,.,.-8-4---1\
-'-cl
~----~---------------'---~~-~--------__;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __;__ _ _ _ _ _~----.J

POTHHIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE ~DENTIFICA TION
&EPA· SITE INSPECTION REPORT

PART2· WASTE lNFORMATlON
~ A1i Jc~~~~~~;8o
··--··------- --------
~----
- · - ·-----~---
II. WASTE STA TES, CUANTITlC:S, AND C~ARACTERISTJCS
~STATES 1c.~ "'""""""'11
'~~ii'"'" n~ '"'~ "'""'~'
02 rE CU.<.'ir.T't ' '
•.,u•
C E·~lUBLE
Jl>.I__.,..., o/
~ WOHi. rL1.::t!1 . C I. }otr3HL Y VOL' Til£

C
0
FINES
c/,swRRY
~ F UOUIO TUNS
C. RA[;IOACTNE
LJ
~
1G. iNFC.:7lOUS
FUW.~A6LE
C J. i:Xh CSNE
C K_ FE_•CTIVE
UDGE ·- G.. G.o.S
CUB>CYAACS ._ lG()Q C D. P~f<SlS7ENT G H. IG>~ll .'-BlE CL 11•:--=~'-FJ...TISLE
L ~- ~:;r ~Pt...:C.:.3\..£
o o. or"'ER - - - :S.-+tJ
-··--- ....O.OFDRUMS
Ill. WASTE TYPE

------~
SUE!.STAHCE tr' . .- •• ~,-
CATEUORY f.)2 UNfTCF CO>«MENTS
SLUDGE ..
SLU
OLW OILYWAS7E
.sm
PSO P!::STIC:DES
---
·(xg OTHERO"'t::"""" ~·''.:'"""Al c 900 :u', y ss Chemical waste/ Love Canal
-
lOt,; INCRG..o!NIC
ACD ACIDS
SAS
(MES~ 1 1d chromium, plating sludge
JV. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES rs-_.:,._-.u
.....----.~ ..-
,,,,.._,,...,._,n, .,..,,os """"~"''
C2 SUES7ANCE NAME
OOME"-Sl.JRECF
01 CATEGORY 03 C-"S NUMBER 0" S TCRAGE.'DSPOS.<L 1.'Ei}i00 CS COf.'CE.>f/RATICN
~------- ·-~---------
.Q'.:~E>.rffi "- 'i10N
MES 999 1 Ifill 67-20,000 ppb

--·~·- -- -- ·--
occ 2-..~i~th_y_~ente.n ~---299 ____ c.-l_andfi 1 J ~·--·--·
___182_,DOO . __ppb____
ace
--- 2- ( lL!._cl_'.i:!Ilet~y_!J_.=!:_____ 999 ---~ndfill 183,000 f?-Ob
occ mr>thvlfuran landfill - -
occ phenol 108-95-2 landfill r,ooo mg/l
MES
SOL
mercury
benzene
17439-97-6
71432
I landfill
land till
l 0.5 ppb
SOL toluene 108883 landfill - -

SOL _.l!lethylene chloride 999 landfill - -
ace dichlorobenzene 25321-226 la :q 11 - -
occ I tetrachloride 999 la 1dfill - -
occ trichloroethane 127184 1 Ifill - -
U<..:C tncFiT9ioe-thene · ~9- land till - -
occ hs;xacblorQbuta<'liene 87683 landfill - -
v. FEEDSTOCXS ,s.,, ..~,....,C.<SN.,,..,_,.,

·-
CATEGORY
I 01 F"i££DSTOCK NAME
I 02 C>..S NUMBER CATE:GCRY 01 FE!ODSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NUMSER
FOS mPrr.J.rrv 7439-97-6 I

FDS
FDS FDS
FDS FDS
VI. SOURCES OF INFORMATION 1ch"'"""""',..,.......,..._ ._.,._,,., • ....._,.....,_...,...,..... """""'"'.

1.) Investigation.of Selected Inactive Toxic Landfills in conjunction with the Niagara
River Study, II Aug. 1981, (U.S.G.S.)
2.) Memo to Hennesey NYSDOT, 8/9/78
3.) Letter to Caine NYSDOT from Hooker, 5/9/68
f:.PAFOF.M :!:l7G-IJ(7·61)
E. IOENTlFICATION
~ -·
~tl r=r)A.. . POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PAiU J' - DESCRIPTION OF HAZJ..Jmous COMDITIONS AHO INCIDEH'
•Et~l~~[t! ~1r_J12Q___
/ -·-
S.~E',.SE..'Ut:D ~DATE: U~781 _) · -I
II. HAz..(RDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS
01 ti A.. GROUr~ow,i;;e.'1 CCNT AMll~A TIOH
------- G >J..LEGC:D
02 C POIENTlAL
03 PCPUL!.ilONF-OHolr.lALLY AFFEC~EO: Ced NAAP.A nve DESCRIPnON
Well sampling shows con t;:nnina t i on by lead and organic chemi9als.
01
I . .
f;/B. SUF.F/.CE WATf:'1 CONTAMINATION • 0:2 ~i
I //t;jj 0 ?ClE!ITIAL
-·C! AU-'-'-GED
03 PO?UL:,TivNPOiENTIALLY AFri::CiED: O<:: t·V·F.RATIVt DE5Cl1IFTICN
Rust colored red stains in standing water and s o i l . Chemical analyses show
low levels of methylene chloride and TOX.
I
Ot CC. CONT.tU:NATlON CF AIR 02 SYbBSE.HVEDIDATE: 77821 ~ 0 F-Oi B-fl1AL ~ All..EGED
03 POPULATION F-OH:.NT\All..Y AFFECTED: C4 NMiFAllVC DESCRIPTION
None.
- L.'
01 ~ o. RRE'E(J't.CSIVE cc:-:orncus 02 ii(
C BSE.'WED (DA TE: 77821 I t..; P01'E'-'TIAL C: AU..EGED
03 PCPUUTICN?Oli.:NTILLLY AFrECTED: 04 NAP.AA TIVE ;)ESCRIPllON
Small fire of unknown origin burning unattended.
L / /
01 (9/s DIREt..1 CCNTACT 02 !ri-6BSEiWE!J (DAT"E: 728~ I ~TB<TIAt. 0 AtU:!'..>EO

03 PCPULA TION POlE.JmALL Y AFf'=.CTED:· "-100 04 NARRATIVE DESCR!FTlON :
Site used by local residents as play area.
/ /
Qt ef F. CONTAMINATION OF SOtL 02. 8UBSE.."NED (DA TE.: 7/24/81 J PQ f'ENTIIY_ 0 Al.LEGE!>
03 MIEA POTENTIALLY AFrt::CTED: 04 NAF\RA TIVE DESCRIPTION
·--·
Soil samples show metal and organic contaminat(.on •.
0\ O G. DRINKING
-
WATC:i'ICCNTAMl~lATION 02 o ce.&n-vEJ 10ATe: ) !Zi PO rEJffiAL 0 AlLEGED
03 ?OPULA TICN POl ENnALL Y AFFECTED: 0-< NARP.A TIVE DESCRIFTION
No.
01 C. H. WORKE.:::; r.;i:FCSUREJIN.JURY 02 [! OSSE.."IVED IDA n:: I ;: POl"EH1AL c ~u.EGC.0

Qi WORKEn3 POIENTIALL Y AFFC:CiEO: 04 NARRA nVE DESCRIPTION
None.
/
01 0 I. PCF\JUTION E<POSURE.ilN.JURY 02. 0 OBSEHVED(DATE.: I ii( PO Tc_..ffiA L G Al..LEGED
03 PCPUU. TION POTENTIALLY AFr'C:CTED: f\-lQQ 04 NARRATIVE C!':SCRIPllCN
No known injuries.
-
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE ~E.NTiFIC~ noN
\?:;:1 r·~:lf\
... ~ C;! s.:TE~-~::. c,ffi-
4"'
,-.: . ' SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PART 3- DESCRIPllON OF HAZAF\DOUS CONDlllOIJS AND INCIDENTS
y__] ___QijQ_QS J'it38Q____
..
IL HA22ADOUS CONDITl()NS ANO _INCIDENTS 1 c,~,~ _ _ _ _L_
01 efJ. D.t..MAGE TO FLORA -- 02 li'.'."'CE.SE:"NEQ (D"- TE ----1fS4---1 s P0-1 E!'.fllA.L '.: AlJ.£-{;2)
04 N,:.F.F.ATNE D[SCH!FTION
None observed.
/ . /
01 C K. DAf!..t..Gc TO F !.UNA 02 l?c2Sc.."<vEci (D."- TE: 7j_§_~--- l ~~~err.~c ALL:-:;c:n____
04 N.•.RRA l1VE CESCRi?T10N •NLo• "~"'Of'-'~·
Abundant·· small animal wildlife on site. No damage observed.
_z'.'.'--~L
----
01 iJ L CONT ,l,f..'.INA I.ON OF FOOD CiiAIN 02 C CESE::lVED (CATE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ) u.;..' r\.) IC..: I C Al..lffi@
04 NAAR.'-TIVE DES:P.IPTION
I
Potential to aqua ti\: microorganisms in ponds and trenches
J_ / --·---
01 q/M. UNSTA8l£ C8NTAlf~MENT CF WASTES 02 ifoBSE."<VED (DATE: _;1.,L.28/83 l . POTENTIAL C:: AU.£GCD
(!.,i.-_.._t.'R..J.-C'nlS! .. '>'C.r·.; ...:;.-:-.....!. l.•..._~ Ol'\rTl:ll
C3 PCPUL>.'10N POIENTIAL..LY AFFECTED: 04 NAMRPT'VE CESCRIP1l0N 7/83
Pools of orange tinted standing water onserved, rubbish protruding
from earth.
01 !J N. DAMAGE TO OFi'SITE PROPEiHY 02 C:: CBSE.'NED (DATE: l C POTENTIAL C: All..EGED
04 NARRATIVE DE~;:;:Pl1CN
None.
..
01 CJ 0. CONT ;..Mn~X1lCN CF SEWEnS. STORM ORAJNS. l'iWTP:i 02 C CBSE."iVEil !DATE: l C POTE"mAL C:: All...EGC!l
04 NARAA'1VE DESCP.IP1lON
None.
I L
01 1:/P. !UEGAL'UNAUTHORlZED DUMPl"IG 02 ii OE.SERVED !DA TE 6 L'.J L:,.81 I C POTE'JTIAL ~ Au_""3ED
04 NARRA -:NE DE.3CnlPTlCN
Niagara County DOH observed "evidence of dumping" after site clos~d.
05 DESCRIPTION CF A.NY OTHER Kt-IGWN. POTENTIAL CA All.EGED HAZARDS
.
.
Ill TOTAL ?OPULHlON POTENTIALLY AFFcCTED: unKnown
IV. COMMENTS
Per NYSDEC instruction, Phase I I study did not address extent of

contamination. Therefore, total population potentially affected cannot
be determined.
V. SOURCES OF INFOF>lr1A TION 1Cu ~n·~- ..... •·· ,,.,. , ... ,_ ,_...-..,.. ~- ·~
1.) Niagara County DOH 1981

2. ) U.S.G.S. Study, 1982/83
3. ) Site visits during Phase II investigations
E?A FOP.1.12070- t.317-81)
I
I. iDENTIFICATlON
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION
PART 4- PE!"iMIT AND DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION
! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------·-·------------------......_______ --------
II. PERMIT INfOflMA TION
Ol TYPE
---------·----c----
or ;:.:...=.~rr ISSUED
~c:'"""" ,lit/I;". . ~)
cable
CB. UlC
:::iC. AIR
0 D. RCRA.
f----------·--·---------·--<----------····~ ---~·-- .. -------·--~------·-------+--------... ----·--·------------
, ______ _____
0 E.. RCRA llffC:FiM ST;.. TUS
.. -------;----------------:-·---·------------~----------
0 F. S?CC PLAN
-----------r---------------~
0 G. ST ATE <S.:""""'11
OH.
DI.
OJ. NONE·
______________
111. SITE DESCRIPTlON _._ _______________
--·r~GTMER
0.2 A"'IOUNT
0 A. SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 0 A.. INCENE?.A llON

0 .8. PILES '.J 8. UNCE.'<.Gi'.OUNO IN.JECT.ON - 0 UUU,,NGSCNSTE
0 C. CRUMS. A60VE GROUND 0 C. CHEMICAL/PHY:'OJCAL
0 D. T,INK, ABOVE GROUND 0 D. BIOLOGICAL
[J Y~.NK. SB.CW GROUND 0 E.. WASTE CIL PROCESS1NG 05 ,._;:;E.:. CF S.'TE
q.,{ UNDFIU. 0 F. 50LV8ff RECOVE.=W
o G. wmF ..:,,qM 0 ~OTHEH RECYCUNGi'<ECCVER'( 7_ _ _ _ _ :.tc:-i
0 H. OPEN OUM? f!t'H.OTHER~'~"~:~-----:-c------
0 I. CTrlER ---.:---:c--·---
07 CCMMC.'iTS
Poorly closed; tires, metal, other rubbish visible
IV. CONTAn<MENT
C A. ACE I.JU ATE. ScCURE G 8. !..ttJDE.~ TE 8 C. INADECUATE. ?OOR
1.) Poorly closed; tires, metal, other rubbish visible.

2.) trench for Love Canal waste excavated in soft, l clay.
barriers installed.
V. ACCESSIBILITY
Ol Wl.STI:: E.'-SlLY •CCESSJBU!.: YES ONO
02 c:;;µMf_."<T'1'
Unfenced, easy access
1.) Site on, sununer 1983

2.) Memo to Hennesey NYSDOT, 8/9/84
E?" FQRJ.I 207(). 1317·<11 I

POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WAS1E SITE
SITE INS?ECTJON RE?ORT
PART 5 • WATF:i, DEMOGP.t-PHIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
·--------------
11. DRlt~KING
'.J(A TCR SUPPLY
- - - - - ---------
01 "iYPE CF tR:Nr1>,.G SUt.,~L't
,c..,....c•~....:,.;..;:.__-~1
SURF,.CE/ WEll. AFFcCTCD MCNITCRED

COJ..IMUNITY A.IV B.Q A.0 B.0 c.o A.. _________ _Jmi)
NCN-CQl,lMUNITY o.o D.0 E. 0 F.CJ B. _ _ _ _ _ _ [mij
111. GROUIWWA 1t:R
0 A_ C•;LY SCUR':::C: F-:JR DRINU'-'G 0 E!. ~lNKJ>,jQ 0 C. C0l-AME?C!Al_ lNOUSTM.!,t.,L :ERtG.A.TlCN

{C-:.."..,.· ~ .. >d:*< ~-L.,~ [:_r.- p0 C:::.""_, ~.U~ ..... • .... ~J
..... ~ CCJ...lM::rc~&.I_ ;•4,-:.C:!i:7?1~L JFF.lG.ATlON

{~ C!."Noof ....,..,,_., ..~Yi't"~t ·-..:.:..1
SW,S,SE
1
Network of sampling wells varying from 10 to 70' in depth
located throughout the landfill
10 RE$H~FC,C AREA
uYyf'.s CCMME.'ITS
D NO
Ol ~UR/CE W"-o"E:R L:..'SEtCJ>+c< ,,..,.,
ifA.
'
RESE."VCIR. RECREATION
CRlNKING VIA TER SOURCE
~RR1GATICN, ECONOIAICALLY
IMPORTANT iiESOURCES
O C. COMME.FiCIAL. INDUSIRIAL G 0. NOT CURRENTI.y usc:n
oi ,i.FFrC7ED•POTE.'<llA.l_!_Y •.FFECTE!l 600lcS OFWATE.R
NAME: AFi'ECTED
small pond on site
Sawyer Creek 0.25 (mi)
Bull Creek 1.1 !mil

Tonawanda Creek. fmi)
1---~·-·-----
2.3
01 TOTAlf-CP\JlATICNW1TI-llN 02 Pl!>l "-NCE TO NEAREST ?QPUU.TION
ONE 111 Mill: CF SITE T\VO (2) MILES CF SITE

A.. ~-?()_Q_ B. _§d_Q£_ 350 •
NO CFfE..~<.:~S ~: ...:.F ?Er;.soHS
o:; NU'-<cE~ CF SUllDJNG.S WITHIN n'iO 12l MILES CF SITE
1620 350'
-···~----
Site is located adjacent to a suburban housing development.
E?A FCRl-4 2070-1317·811

SITE INSPECTION fiEPORT
PART 5-WATER, DEMOGRAPHIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA NY 000514 380
B. 10-• - 10-e
::::; A., 11.~FE:=.1.1E..:.Bt..E (] 8. REL'- li\'EL Y lfl.PE..=\>.1E.!-BL!: PE?.Mf."BU: C D. VERY FE:l~~EA8LE

tiu.i r."'•..., 10-d ::::nv».CI ~ po- 4 - iu-' !:..:n:u·et re.-.-., ... ,•...,.') io-1 -:...-n-1#CI
SLOPE
S«Tc SLOPE DIRECTION CF SITT SLOPE TE=\RAIN /.VE.HAGE SlOPE
1 _ _,,_O
_ _ _% r.-E 1. 0 .,
-------"'
10
0 srr<:: IS CN E.ARRIE.i1 ISLAND. COASTAL HIGH !-i~l'\O AREA, i'IVE."liNE Fl..OOOWAY

FLOOCPL!.IN
ESTUA?.INE OTriE.R ___:L5__.:_ (mi)
s. -~-3_·_5 _ 1mi) ENCANGERED SPEC:ES: I:eregrine_Eal!::;_oJL_jill_lQ_en E gl
CISTANCC: TO:
RESIDENTIAL ARE.:.S; NATIONAUST A TE: f'ARKS. ..tGrllCUL TURAL L~DS
COMME."\C:AUINOUSTRIAL FORESTS. uR WILOUFE RESERVES PRIME AG UNO AG LANO
0.01 0.01
A.. _ _ _ _ _ _ (mil 8_ _ _ _ (mi) C. _ _ _ _ _ _ fmil 0. _ _ _ _ _ _ (ml)
UOESOHPTION
Site is located in a flat, poorly drained area. Prior to dumping,

I site was a swamp, with drafnage to the North.
VII. SOURCES OF lNFCFiMA TION 1C-1. ~ ""'~-- •-9-. ,.a,·- - ...,_,..,,. , _
1.) U.S.G.S. Study

2.) DEC site Dossier
3.) Phase II Investigation
&L:F>A
POT8lTI/..l HAZARDOUS WASTE SIT_
PART~- SAMPLE AND FIEL~~~~~RMA no~-----=-=-~:==-----=-=
i=
. NY
--------1
r:;--lDl:-.'It:lc:lii:~
Tlf'C.\ lJON
0000514380
NUl..w:rl -
IL SM.~PLES T AXEN
I 01 NUM SER Of= I 02 S.•h'?LES :SL.'11 10 iC:1E5;;!.!A.;E'.)c; ,If
S,.LJ~PLE TYPE ),'1,'),J~C-~_£
~--------·------ -------- --- ~·----------- -.

GROUNDWAT'En 8 Compu Chem I/ 14
SURFACE
1tl
5 ES la.ho -. ;1;:,hl,,__
W/..STE
-- -------~-- -~---
A.IA
---- ··-- ------ --
f!Ul,j()Fr' . ---
---
_,,_
.
SP1U.
--------
SOIL -
VE-GETATION -
OTHER sediment 3 Compu Chem

-
UL FlELD MEASUREMENTS TAKEN
01 TYPE o:;: COM~'(J'S
Downhole gamma
logging Performed in wells to define soil .graphy
Geophysical survey Performed to locate disposal trench boundaries
Permeability test- Perfo:r:med in wells to evaluate rate of contaminant movement
inq
-- .- -·
--
.. .. . , ..
--·
-
JV. PHOTOGR~HS ANO MAPS
uames
-
Moore or rice
~OUNO
1:,,
C AERIAL 02 IN OJSTCOY OF .
01 TYPE
I ·---~---------
tt...w'r,.oJ~·f'fjf'IOl'rn<::.....,..,
03"-'% 04 LOCA llON OF "'APS

ES Dames & Moore office
ONO I
V. OTHER Fl ELD DA TA COLLECTED 1--...,. ".,,.,,,.,,,,.,.,"~""""''
~-
Soil samples were collected during the drilling of the seven sampling
wells. Grain size an~lyses of selected samples were performed in the
laboratory.
Vl. SOURCES OF INF OR MA TION :c., • ..,...,..,. "'"'....,..._. ,,_. '"" ,...._ ,.....,.,_ """"""- ,.,,.,,,.,
Phase I I investigation
POTEHTIALHAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION REYORT
PART7-0WNER ltffORMATION
II, CURRENT OWNEi'l(S)
Town of Wheatfield
U. &a, .~f O" .rr::..J
2800 Church Road
N.Tonawanda
01
11SICCOO€
05 CffY 08 ccoe
01 N,lME Cll o+a NUMBER
03 STREET .l.OCAESS1.• Q ,;..,., WO'· wc.J 04 SICCOOE 11SICCOCE
I
ST A TE 01 Z:PCoDE 120TY 13STATEi14 l.JP ccoe
1--~~~~~~·~~~~~-~~~~"-~~..;.
02 Q,. B NUMB-SF! oa N.u.<e C9 0 + 6 NUM6E-'I
10 ST?.Ei:T AfXJRESS tf' Q De<. RFD•. o<e.j 11SICCCOE
05C.TY 07 z:F>CODE 1 2 c::T)' 1:l STATE 14 ZlP CODE
JILPREVIOUS OWNEi1(S)'.,.._,,,,,.,.,~........ IV. REAL TY OWNE?.(Sj """'~~-:»Jmu~-,.,..,

!----------------------.......-----------+------·
01 NAME. 02 O+SNUt.«BE.J; 0+6NUMBER
05 CITY Ot1 s1" TE 01 ZJP cooe 05CH'Y 106 sn.TE 07 ZlPCOoe,
01 NAME. 02 o+a NUMBER
03 STREET .lOORESS (.P.Q_ s.:,.a_ RFD'· ..rt;_J 04 SJCCOOE o:; STREET ADORE 0-.S If' O. bo&. Af'D •. •"'-I O...SlCCODE
oe STA;'C 07 Z:.? CODE ]°5 ST ATE 07 ZJP CODE
I 02 D+ B NUMBER 101 NAME' 02 o ... a NUM6Ei'\
0• SJCCCOE. O:J STREET ,.tDORESS~.? O. 5o..1. ~FO,, •tc...J IC4 SC CODE
O!IOTY 06STATE. 07 ZlP CODE 'C6 i.JPCOCE
New York State Tax Records
cl',._ FOR'-1 207CH:l (7«31)

I
FART a- OPERATOR INFORMATION
GPE::l.ATCR'S PARENT COMPANY ·~"''""''<"".'
F REYIOUS OPE::lA TORS' PARENT COMPANIES '"""'.«u-.i
I
16 STAIE 1e ZJP CODE
11 0-ril NUM8EH
1 2 SIBEE> MJDRESS /!' O. ao._ !<FD•, "1;.) 1.J SlCCDDE
ce ST A TE 0 7 ZlP CCDE. 1 s STA TE HLw? cooe
08 Y£All:S CF CPE.'UTlO'
01 NAME 02 D+B NUMBER
12 SIRE,;! ADDRESS ii' 0, A><. i'IFD•, *'c.J cooe
O~ CITY 06 STATE I o7 ZJPCODE 14 CITY '5 STATE 16 ZlPCODE
Niagara County Department of Health, 1981

I. IDt.NTlrlCA !lON
POTENTIAL HAZ.A.RDOUS WASTE SITE
&EP/\ SITE INSPECTION RE?ORT
PART 9 GENE?1AIORJTRANSPCRTER INFORMATlON
NY 0000514380
Ill. OFF-SiTE GENERATOF!(S)

-01 .,,....;j;----·~------------~-0-2-0-~-s-N-.w-.,.-,8-ER---~-o-1-·--------- ...-----·----.... _____ ~----- . -····
Hooker Chemical Niagara Falls Air Force
C3
os crrY oe STATE 07 ZJP =oe 05 CITY

Niagara Falls NY Niagara Falls
01 NAl.lE
Bell Aerospace
o• s;c c:::ioE
Buffalo Ave
6 ST ,q E 0 7 ZJP c::::oe G5CfTY
Niagara Falls
IV. TRANSPORTc:R(S}
01 NAME 01 N.Ai...E 02 0+ c NUMBE."l
Niagara Sanitation Co.
C'3SrREl ADORESS/P.O. 5<.i..ilFD• ... ~
' OS CITY 06 ST ATE 07 ZlF CODE
N. Tonawanda NY
02 D+S NUMBER 01 NAME
03 SIBE.!:T ADORE.SS lP 0. ""'- AFDI. o<e.I C• S,,C CODE 03 STRE:T AOORESS ;Po. 5Q.(.. ;11'"~ f'. Yrt:..J 04SJCCOOE
050TY II STATE 07 ZJPCODE OSCITY 06STATE 072lPCCOE
V. SQURCES OF INFOF\MA TJON 1c." "''""'°"' ,..,_...,., •._. 0.. ,..,, •-.... ~·'""""' -.....""· ,.,.,,,.,
Other off-site generator: Frontier Chemical

l IDt=NTiF!CATIOH
POTENTIAL HAZAt1DOUS WASTE SITE
SITE lNSPECTIOf'-1 RE?ORT
---;;;_~ n] c~ !::i1E" "i'u ....'?.E.R--
NY 0000514380
PART 10 - PAST RESPCHSE ACTlVITIES ----------~
il PAS7 r.ESFC~Sc ACT.YfilES
No.
01 B. WAIC:..'1 SUPPLY FROVJDED
04 CESCRlPTtON
No.
01 0 C. Pt:?.IJ./.NefT C2 C:A T E - - · - · - - - - - - -
04 DCSCFilF110N
No.
04 DESCRJ?TlCN
No.
--------------------------------------------------
01 CE CONTAM!NATED SOIL REMOVED 02 DATE------·------- 03 AG2vCY - - - · - - - - - - - - -
04 0£_<;CR!PT.ON
No.
03 AGE.NCY __
04 CESCRIPT\QN
No.
01 0 G.. W•STE GiSPCS@ E1!'£f,'HERE. 02 DA TE--------------- ----------------
04 DESCRIFllCN No.
01 0 H. CN
04 DESC.'ilPTlCN No.
1-------------------------------
01 0 l IN smJ C.'-i~!C.l\L TREATMENT
------ · · - - - · · · - - - - - - - - · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - !
02 DATE __ - - - - - - - -
04 CESO'llPTlGN
No.
01 0 J. IN SITU 8JOl..OGX::AL TR£i;TM£Nr 02DATE _ _ _ _ __ 03AGCNCY

04 DESCRIPT'.QN
No.
01 0 K_ IN SITU PH':'SIC.!J. TRE.1.;1f.AENT 03AGE"K:Y ----------~
04 DESCRIPT.ON
No.
01 0 L ENCAPSULATION 02 D A T E - - - - - - - - 03AGE"ICY - - - - - - - - - - - -
04 DESCRIPTlON
No.
01 0 M. EMIS9GE..'£Y WA::;,TE TREATMENT 02 DATE··--------··- 03 AGENCY - - - - · · - - - - -
04 CEO.CRiPTION
No.
01 2 N. CUTOFr WAUS 02 D A T E - - - - - - - - 03 AGE.>;Cy - - - · · · - - - - - - - - -
04 OESCRJ?TlGN No.
01 Ci 0. EMERG8lCY DIKING/SUP.FACE WATER DIVE:".SlON 02 DATE OJ AGENCY

04 OE.SCr.IFTlON
No.
01 0 P. CVTCFF TRE!'la;ES!SUMP 02 DATE _ _ _ __
03 AGENCY - - - - - - - - - - - - -
04 OESCRlPTlON
No.
01 0 0. SUBSIJRF"CE CUTCFF WALL 02 DATE
04- DESCRIPTION
No.
SITE INSPECllON REPORT
PART~ 0 - PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES
02 DATE _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No.
02 DATE _____________ 03 AGENCY_....- - - - - - - - - - -
Incomplete cover of waste (trash)

02 OATC _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 03 AGENCY _________ . - - - -
No.
02 DATE _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 0.3 AG"'_'ICY ____ - - - - - - · · · - - · -
No.
SE.!.l.£D. 02 DATE 03 AGS"<CY
No.
02 DATE 03 AG2-;CY
No.
02 DATE 03
No.
.02 DATE _ _ _ _ _ __
No.
02 DATE _ _ _ __ 03 AG8.;C'i _ _ _ _ _ _· - - - - - - -
No.
02 DATE 03 A G E N C Y - - - · - - - - - - - -
is surrounded by incomplete (although locked) fence.
0 2. PCPUU.'ilON RELOCATE) 02DATE _ _ _ _ _ __ 03 AGENCY

04 DESCRl?TlCN No.
01 G 3. OTHEH REMEiJW_ ACTMTIES. 02DATE _ _ _ _ _ __

04 DESCRIPTION
None.
Ill. SOURCES OF INFORMATION 1c::. """°""',,.,.,...,.,..._ •·•-- ,,,,,., ,._._,,,.,,... ~ , _

' .
Site visits during Phase II investigation
f..?AfGPI.! 2C70·1J :7-1111

ifiCA T10N
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE ----
(;2 $f-E '11V"':'~ )
SITE INSPECTION RE?ORT
PART11-ENFORCEMENTINFORMATION 0000514380.
JIL SOURCES OF JNFORMATICN .c.1 • . -.. ..,~~...... .._ .,..,.,....._ ...,,..,,,....,.,.,.,.,._~,

SECTION VI
PRELIMINARY REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES AND COST
Introduction
The purpose of this conceptual remedial alternative evaluation is
to identify potential remedial action technologies and prepare a
conceptual cost estimate for the most likely remedial alternative
for the Nash Road site. Due to the preliminary nature of the
data available, any remedial alternative evaluation must be
considered very preliminary and, hence, would be conservative. A
more detailed remedial investigation and feasibility study would
be required to better define design criteria and costs for
remedial alternatives.
Identification .Qf Remedial Methods

The conceptual remedial alternatives considered for the Nash Road
site were subjected to a three-tiered screening process. First,
remedial action methods were screened to determine applicability
to the site. The methods were selected to conform with the on-
site actions for remediation of hazardous material releases, as
presented in the National Contingency Plan. Remedial action
methods were eliminated if they were considered unnecessary at
the Nash Road landfill. The screening process and rationale for
selection of engineering methods is summarized in Table VI.l.
Based on this screening only surface water and ground water
controls were retained for the second screening process.
VI-1
Second Screening .Q.f Remedial Actions
In the second screening process, the engineering methods
identified in the first screening process were further evaluated.
The results of the second screening of remedial actions are
presented in Table VI.2.
Remedial actions for surface water controls which were retained

after this screening process include capping, grading,
revegetation and perimeter fencing. Although no on-site surface
water contamination or migration of contaminants was indicated
during the Phase II investigation, these actions are considered
to be applicable since they will 1) reduce the potential for
future releases to surface water, 2) protect the public health by
eliminating exposure to hazardous substances by direct contact
and 3) minimize the risk of fires.
Actions for containment and/or pumping of ground water were

eliminated during this phase of the screening process because,
al though some analytical results of ground water samples
collected as part of the Phase II investigation indicated slight
metals contamination, the migration of significantly contaminated
ground water from the site was not found. Furthermore, due to
the geology of the site, these remedial actions would be
technically difficult and/or expensive to implement. Only
continued monitoring of ground water was retained for further
consideration. Collection and analysis of ground water samples
from on-site wells will confirm or deny the existence of
significant heavy metals contamination.
VI-2
Evaluation .Q..f Remedial Alternatives
The third screening process involved a more detailed evaluation
of several combinations of remedial actions that had passed the
first two screening steps. Alternatives were scored in a general
sense (unfavorable, fair, favorable} in each of five categories:
technical feasibility, environmental impact, public health risk,
and regulatory compliance. The total score for an alternative is
not necessarily an indication of overall acceptability.
For example, alternatives may score high in all categories

except regulatory compliance, and therefore would be eliminated.
Conversely, the monitoring alternative is retained throughout,
regardless of its rating, to act as the baseline (i.e., lowest)
level of effort for comparison.
The basic elements of each of the five criterion are as follows:
Technical Applicability
The technical applicability of a remedial action technology
refers to its ability to achieve performance standards such as:
a) protection of the groundwater aquifer, and b} minimization of
emissions. In addition, the ease of implementation is important.
This criterion provides an effective means of reducing a very
large number of alternatives to only those that are applicable
from an engineering standpoint.
VI-3
Environmental Impact
The most important environmental impacts are the potentials for
surface water, ground water and air emission contamination. Each
alternative was screened in consideration of its ability to
prevent contamination of these three media.
Public Health Risk

The key concern of the Superfund program is protection of the
public health. Potential areas of risk are: contamination of
ground water supplies and surface water supplies, emissions of
volatile hazardous compounds to the atmosphere, spills of
hazardous substances during transportation to acceptable disposal
sites, exposure of the public or workers to toxic substances
during cleanup operations, accidental or purposeful entry by
unauthorized personnel into the sites and subsequent contact with
hazardous wastes.
Regulatory Compliance/Acceptability
The involved regulatory agencies and their means of
responsibility are as follows:
New York Department of Environmental Conservation (Albany)
New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Region 9
(Bufffalo)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region II (New York)
Preferred alternatives must comply with all regulatory
requirements and have regulatory agency support.
The evaluation of potential remedial alternatives for surface
VI-4
water controls and ground water controls is presented in Table
VI.3. Capping, grading, revegetation and limiting site access by
erection of a fence around the perimeter of the site is judged to
be an appropriate remedial alternative for controlling migration
of contaminants off-site, preventing human contact with hazardous
substances and reducing the possibility of fires or explosions.
Collection and analysis of additional ground water samples is

considered to be an appropriate remedial alternative, to
determine whether or not significant contamination of ground
water exists on the site. Although this remedial alternative
scored only fair for environmental impact and regulatory
compliance, since slight lead contamination (concentration in
excess of state standards) was detected in one of two ground
water samples; the public health risk is low since the ground
water is not used for drinking water. This alternative is judged
to be the appropriate level of response, based on existing data.
Conceptual .c.ruit. Estimate

A conceptual cost estimate was prepared for the alternatives
which were developed for surface water controls and ground water
controls. The following are assumptions which were made to
generate a preliminary cost estimate for capping the landfill.
The area of the landfill is estimated to be approximately 25
acres in size. The former disposal trench would have to be
dewatered and filled prior to capping. Vegetation would need to
be cleared and the site would have to be graded and recontoured
prior to capping. The cap would consist of a one-foot layer of
VI-5
compacted clay. The drainage ditch north of the site would
require reconstruction after capping of the site. Revegetation
would consist of a layer of topsoil, covered with grass seed and
mulch. The perimeter fence will surround the 25-acre site and be
six feet high. Using the above assumptions, published cost
information, a contingency of 30% and engineering of 20%, the
preliminary capital cost for this alternative is 2 million
dollars. {Table VI.4).
The cost of the ground water monitoring alternative considers the

collection of two rounds of samples from the monitoring wells and
from the Osterman well. These samples would be filtered in the
field to reduce.variability in the analytical results. The
estimated cost for collection and analysis for heavy metals of
two rounds of samples is $11,100.
VI-6
TABLE VI.l
IDENTIFICATION OF REMEDIAL ACTION METHODS (FIRST SCREENING)
METHOD APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE COMMENTS
Air Emissions Controls x No air contamination detected.

Surface Water Controls x No surface water detected,
however, site capping would
eliminate ponding and reduce
leachate generation. Also
reduces public health risk for
exposure by direct contact and
fire and explosion hazard.
Ground Water Controls x Ground water contamination not
confirmed. Additional sampling
and analysis of monitoring
wells is required.
Comtaminated Water and x No susceptible municipal sewer
Sewer Lines or water lines.
Treatment x No treatment of air, water,
wastes, sediment or soil re-
quired. Highest concentrations
of metals detected in ground
water samples are low enough
for discharge to public sewer
systems.
TABLE VI.2
PRELIMINARY SCREENING OF REMEDIAL ACTIONS (SECOND SCREENING)
ALTERNATIVE APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE COMMENTS
Surface Na.te.t. Controls

Containment (capping) x Conventional, demonstrated relatively low cost technology for
reducing leachate generation and minimizing public health risk
by direct contact.
Grading x Site should be graded to promote surface runoff to drainage ditch
north of landfill. Drainage ditch should be regraded and main-
tained to convey runoff away from site.
Revegetation x Revegetation stabilizes the surface of the site, and controls
erosion of the cap.
Perimeter Fencing x Limits access to site to minimize public health risk and damage
to the cap.
Ground Na.te.t. Controls

Monitoring x Ground water contamination not confirmed, additional sampling
and analysis of samples for metals is required.
Impermeable Barriers
-Slurry Walls x Depth to bedrock reduces technical feasibility and increases
-Grout Curtains x cost. Fractures in dolomite bedrock may be flow path.
-Sheet Piling x
Permeable Treatment Bed x No practical means available to divert ground water to treat-
ment bed. Synthetic ion exchange resins for metals removal may
plug. Maintenance costly and difficult. Capital cost extremely
high.
Ground Water Pumping x Ground water pumping is not feasible due to low permeability of
soils above bedrock. Bedrock may yield water from fractures,
but may not contain contaminant plume.
Leachate Control
-Subsurface Drains x Not practical as extensive soil excavation would be required for
-Drainage Ditches x leachate control systems.
-Liners x
TABLE VI.3
ELEVATION OF POTENTIAL REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES {THIRD SCREENING)
ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATORY ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT
ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY IMPACT RISK ACCEPTANCE COMMENTS RETAIN OPTION
Capping, Grading, Revegetation 3 3 3 3 Provides effective means YES

and Perimeter Fencing for control of migration of
contaminants off-site and
reduces public health risk
and fire and explosion hazard.
Ground ~ Controls
Monitoring 3 2 3 2 Additional sampling and YES
analysis for heavy metals
would confirm or deny the
existence of contamination.
Present analytical results
are inconclusive, however no
significant contamination was
found.
Legend: 1 =Unfavorable (i.e., high cost, severe environmental impacts, high health risks, poor regulatory compliance,
unproven or difficult technology)
2 "' Fair
3 = Favorable
Table VI.4
Summary of Conceptual Remedial Cost Estimate
Nash Road Landfill
Item No. Description Approximate

Cost ( 1)
I. Site dewatering and preliminary $ 290,000

site work prior to grading,
capping, revegetation and
perimeter fencing
II. Site grading and drainage $ 327,000
III. Surf ace sealing and capping $ 592,000

(l' thick clay cap)
IV. Revegetation $ 67,000
Topsoil (l'), seed and mulch
v. Perimeter fence (4600') $ 47,000

with two gates (6 1 high)
Subtotal $1,323,000
Contigency (30%) $ 397,000

Engineering (20%) $ 265,000
Total Capital Cost $1,985,000
(l} Costs are in 1984 $

.... (2) These costs are considered preliminary conceptual costs •
-
REFERENCES
NASH ROAD SITE
Calkin, P.E. (1982) NYSGA 54th Annual Meeting Guidebook, p. 121-

148, October 8, 1982.
Calkin, P.E. (1966) NYSGA 38th Annual Meeting Guidebook, p. 58-
68, April 29, 1966.
Friberg, L., Nordberg, G., and Vouck, V. (1979) Handbook on the

Toxicology of Metals, Elsevier Pub., N. Holland, Biomedical
Press, Oxford.
Lambe, T.W., and Whitman, R.V., 1969, Soil Mechanics, John Wiley
& Sons, Inc., 553 p.
Muller, E.H. (1977) Quaternary Geology of New York, Niagara
Sheet, NYSMSS Map & Chart Series No. 28.
Niagara County Department of Health, (1981) Preliminary Report an

Investigation of Selected Inactive Toxic Landfills in
Conjunction with the Niagara River Study.
NYS Museum and Science Service (1970) Map and Chart Series No.
15.
United States Geological Survey (1982) Draft Report of Ongoing

Research Project concerning Toxic Waste Disposal Sites in
New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation Region 9.

NSC 13

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NSC 13

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

"iGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS AT~

INACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES

Division of· Solid and Hazardous Waste

Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste

- v Final Hazard Ranking System

HRS Documentation Records

-- VI.2 Preliminary Screening of Remedial Actions

The Nash Road site is an inactive landfill located in the Town of

The Nash Road site was operated as a landfill by Niagara

Although some wastes are covered, protruding refuse is visible

The Phase II investigation included surface water, sediment, and

Site stratigraphy can be summarized as follows:

Limited analyses of ground water samples from new on-site

residential well, approximately 80 feet deep, was analyzed for

An earlier USGS study showed metal contamination in the shallow

SITE COORDINATES: 43°04' 10.0 11 N. LAT

SITE LOCATION MAP

The purposes of the Nash Road Phase II Site investigation were 1)

The scope of our investigation is summarized in tabular form on

.s..t..e.p l =Emergency Evaluation Surface Nater

.s.t.e.g 2 =..s..it.e. Investigation

Groundwater Monitoring - A network of five deep and two shallow

Groundwater samples were taken in July 1984 from the seven

Sediment Sampling - Sediment samples were collected in July 1984

TASKS DESCRIPTION OF TASK

Step 1 - Emergency Evaluation

TASKS DESCRIPTION OF TASK

Sediment samples from Collect 3 sediment samples at the

....11 Ill SCALE

- Wheatfield, Niagara County, adjacent to the North Tonawanda City

- size. It is surrounded by a suburban residential area, and is

The landfill is visible to many of the residential neighbors

Access to the site is open and unguarded. National Fuel Gas

The volume of onsite surface water fluctuates seasonally. In the

During the field activities in May through July, 1984, abundant

- and deposited widespread accumulations of till.

-- As glacial ice retreated from the region, meltwater formed lakes

.. in front of the ice margin. This region is covered by lake

- sediments, the most recent being from Lake Tonawanda, an elongate

- lake which occupied an east-west valley and drained north into

Granular deposits in this region frequently act as shallow

Bedrock is Lockport Dolostone, occurring at depths varying from

- A till unit is located immediately above the bedrock surface.

- size increases to the west.

Overlying the till is a lower sand unit. A grain size analysis

- this sand unit is interpreted to be an early deposit of Lake

- examples of Lake Tonawanda deposits, as mapped by Muller (1977).

An upper sand unit is located immediately above the clay unit, in

In the eastern part of this site, the upper sand is overlain by a

possible deepening of the Lake Tonawanda water.

unit is defined best from the results of the magnetometer survey.

- Readings on the site were highly variable due to the disturbed

than 58,000 gammas) are interpreted as buried ferromagnetic metal

objects. The magnetic readings of 57,500 gammas are interpreted

as disturbed soil areas and possibly buried ferromagnetic metal

landfill that may be underlain by buried ferromagnetic metal

distinct areas of disturbed soil, i.e., pits and/or trenches, anq

mixed soil/waste fill. Samples taken during drilling support

The stratigraphic relationship between the units can be seen on

(Figure III.l). The sand/waste mixed fill covers part of the

ground surface and is underlain by the upper sand or the clayey

A cross section based on ER sounding values has been prepared and

- This anomaly is of particu~ar interest to the study because it

r ·-·---~---~---41!--~---~--~~~-~ 1~>._!_ !9_~---~--W';L.tfo> (177.5) (194.5)