Rizal Technological University: College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology

RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology

Department of Architecture
Chapter 4
Presentation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Data
This chapter presents, analyzes, and interprets the data from the
results of the survey. The data presented in this chapter were gathered
from the researcher-made questionnaire, followed by the findings, analysis
and interpretation of data.
The results of the survey distributed to 400 respondents through the
online survey will be discussed in this context. The figures and graphs
show the quantitative and qualitative variations and analysis of the study.
1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents (Gender, Age, City of
Residence, Profession and Civil Status)
Gender - This table shows the Gender Frequency of the
respondents and its percentage.
Gender Frequency Percentage

Male 204 51%
Female 196 49%
Other 0 0%
Total 400 100%

Table 1.
Gender Frequency and Percentage of the Respondents
This data reflects the representative’s gender. The majority of the
population are male, with a total number of 204 respondents and a total
number of 196 respondents are female. The total number of respondents is
400.
MODERNO: Lifestyle Center and Vertical Residences in Quezon City

A Modern and Biophilic Architecture Approach
Page 1
Age - The table below shows the frequency distribution and
percentage of the respondents based on age.
Age Frequency Percentage

0-21 years old 75 18.8%
22-37 years old 201 50.2%
38-53 years old 40 17.5%
54 years old and
54 13.5
above
Total 400 100%
Table 2.
Frequency and Percentage of the Respondent Based on Age
The table shows the respondent’s age. The respondents were asked
to point out their age based on the list. According to their response, there
are 75 respondents that are 0-21 years old, 201 with the age of 22-37
years old, 40 with the age of 38-53 years old and 54 with the age of 54 and
above with the total of 400 respondents.
City of Residence - The table present the frequency distribution
and percentage of the location of residency of the respondents.
Location Frequency Percentage

Quezon City 208 52%
Outside Quezon City 192 48%
Total 400 100%
Table 3.
Location of Residency
This figure shows where the respondents reside. It shows clearly
that 208 of the respondents are living inside Quezon City and the
remaining 192 respondents are living outside Quezon City.
Profession - The table present the frequency distribution and
percentage of the residents based on profession.

Page 2
Profession Frequency Percentage

Student 117 29.3%
Employed 132 33%
Self-employed 64 16%
Unemployed 87 21.7%
Total 400 100%
Table 4.
Frequency and Percentage of the Respondent Based on Profession
This figure shows the profession of the respondents. It shows that
the majority of the respondents are employed with a number of 132,
followed by students with a number of 117, unemployed with a number of
87 and self-employed with a number of 64 with the total of 400
respondents.
Civil Status – the table shows the frequency and percentage of the
respondents based on civil status.
Civil Status Frequency Percentage

Single 271 67.8
Married 129 32.3
Total 400 100%
Table 5.
Frequency and Percentage of the Respondent Based on Civil Status
This figure shows the civil status of the respondents. It shows that
the majority of the respondents are single with a total number of 271. The
marrieds’ population based on the table are 129, with a total of 400
respondents.
2. The Researcher-Made Questionnaire
Frequency and percentage of the respondents who
consider/don’t consider living near shopping centers and other
commercial areas.
Page 3
Response Frequency Percentage

Yes 398 99.5%
No 2 0.5%
Maybe 0 0
Total 400 100%
Table 5.
Frequency and percentage of the respondents who consider/don’t consider living
near shopping centers and other commercial areas
The table shows the frequency and percentage of the respondents
who considers living near shopping centers and other commercial areas
and those who don’t. According to the table, it’s clear that the majority of
the respondents considers living near shopping centers and other
commercial areas with a number of 398 out of 400 respondents.
Frequency and percentage of respondents who are familiar with
lifestyle centers and vertical housing.

Yes 350 87.5%
No 4 1%
Maybe 46 11.5%
Total 400 100%
Table 6.
Frequency and percentage of respondents who are familiar with lifestyle centers
and vertical housing.
who are familiar with lifestyle centers and vertical housing. The table shows
that the majority of the respondents are familiar with lifestyle centers and
vertical housing with a number of 350 respondents and a number of 46
respondents with a slight knowledge about it and a total of 4 respondents
who are totally clueless about lifestyle center and vertical housing.

Page 4
Frequency and percentage of the respondents on how often
they visit shopping malls/centers

Always 81 20.3%
Often 18 4.5%
Sometimes 225 56.2%
Rarely 76 19%
Never 0 0
Total 400 100%
Table 7.
Frequency and percentage of the respondents on how often they visit shopping
malls/centers
on how often they visit shopping malls and shopping centers. The table
shows that the majority of the respondents go to shopping malls and
shopping centers sometimes with a total number of 225 which is 56.2% of
the total number of respondents. The remaining respondents are divided
into always with a total number of 81 respondents, followed by rarely with a
total number of 76 respondents and often with a total number of 18
respondents with a total of 400 respondents.
Frequency and percentage of the respondents who wants to
work near their homes and other commercial areas.
Frequency Percentage
Yes 400 100%
No 0 0
Maybe 0 0
Total 400 100%
Table 8.
Frequency and percentage of the respondents who wants to work near their homes
and other commercial areas

Page 5
According to the table, it is clear that 100% of the respondents
wants their workplace near their home and other commercial areas.
Things that will attract the respondents to live in a certain city.

Career Opportunity 371 92.8%
School 153 38.3%
Cost of Living 364 91%
Restaurant and Fast-
108 27%
food Chain
Accessibility to Public
146 36.5%
Parks
Accessibility to Public
247 61.8%
Transportation
Total 400 100%
Table 9.
Things that will attract the respondents to live in a certain city
The table shows the frequency and percentage of the things that will
attract the respondents to live in a certain city. There are a total of 400
respondents. According to the table shown, 92.8% or 371 of the
respondents will live to a certain city if there is a good career opportunity
for their respective fields. 38.3% or 153 of the respondents wants to live
near schools. 364 or 91% of the respondents will live to a certain city
depending on the cost of living. 27% or 108 of the respondents wants to
live near restaurants and fast-food chains. 146 or 36.5% of the
respondents wants to live to a city which is accessible to public parks and

Page 6
61.8% or 247 of the respondents wants to live in a city that is accessible to
public transportation.
People who considers living in a vertical housing.

Yes 381 95.3%
No 1 0.2%
Maybe 18 4.5%
Total 400 100%
Table 10.
People who considers living in a vertical housing
based on their opinion about living in a vertical housing. Base on the table
shown the majority of respondents considers living in a vertical housing
with a total number of 381 respondents and 18 of the respondents are
undecided.
Frequency and percentage of the people who think that having
a lifestyle center and other commercial area in vertical housing is a
good idea.

Yes 394 98.5%
No 0 0
Maybe 6 1.5%
Total 400 100%
Table 11.
Frequency and percentage of the people who think that having a lifestyle center and
other commercial area in vertical housing is a good idea
who think that having a lifestyle center and other commercial spaces in
vertical housing is a good idea. According to the table shown, the majority

Page 7
of the respondents agreed that it is a good idea to have a lifestyle center
and other commercial area in vertical housing with a number of 394
respondents which is 98.5% of the numbers of the respondents chosen.
The remaining respondents are the one who’s in the neutral side.
Frequency and percentage of the respondents who think that
vertical housing can cure land scarcity.

Yes 397 99.3%
No 0 0
Maybe 3 0.7%
Total 400 100%
Table 12.
Frequency and percentage of the respondents who think that vertical housing can
cure land scarcity
based on their belief on whether vertical housing is the cure to land scarcity
or not. Based on the table shown, the majority of the respondents believe
that vertical housing can cure land scarcity in the Philippines with a total
number of 397 respondents. The other 3 respondents are undecided.
Modern and biophilic architecture in designing a vertical
housing.

Yes 399 99.8%
No 0 0
Maybe 1 0.2%
Total 400 100%
Table 13.
Modern and biophilic architecture in designing a vertical housing

Page 8
who agreed to the proposal of the researcher to use the combination of
modern and biophilic architecture in making vertical housing. The majority
of the respondents agreed that modern and biophilic architecture will leave
a good aftertaste in designing vertical housing with a number of 399 which
is 99.8% of the respondents.
Modern and biophilic architecture for the comfort of the users.

Yes 398 99.5%
No 0 0
Maybe 2 0.5%
Total 400 100%
Table 14.
Modern and biophilic architecture for the comfort of the users
who agree that promoting modern and biophilic architecture will help the
users to relax and be comfortable inside the development. The table shown
that the majority of the respondents think that by promoting modern and
biophilic architecture in a development can make the users more relaxed
and comfortable. The number of the majority of the respondents who think
that it is a good idea are 398 which is 99.5% of the respondents. The total
respondents are 400 people.
Frequency and percentage of respondents who think that
lifestyle center and vertical housing will benefit both the residents
and the LGU of Quezon City.

Page 9
Yes 399 99.8%

No 0 0
Maybe 1 0.2%
Total 400 100%
Table 15.
Frequency and percentage of respondents who think that lifestyle center and
vertical housing will benefit both the residents and the LGU of Quezon City
who think that lifestyle center and vertical housing will benefit both the
government and the residents of Quezon City. According to the table
shown, the majority of the respondents agree that lifestyle center and
vertical housing will benefit both residents and government of Quezon City.
The number of respondents who agree is 399 out of 400 which 99.8% of
the total respondents.
MODERNO: A Lifestyle Center and Vertical Residences in
Quezon City, a Modern and Biophilic Architecture Approach’s positive
effects to the residents and economy of Quezon City. Frequency,
percentage and weighted means and interpretation level of the
respondent’s answers through survey-questionnaires.
Stron
Strongly Disagr gly
Agree Neutral Total
Question Agree ee Disag
ree
N % N % N % N % N % N %
As the 312 78 88 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 400 10
population % % 0%
continue to
increase and
the amount of
land for the
amount of
land that can
be used for
Page 10
development
decrease,
vertical
housing is
likely to
become more
prominent
across the
cities around
the world.
Having a
lifestyle
center/shoppi
ng center and
other
77. 22. 10
commercial 311 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 400
7% 3% 0%
establishment
s will be a
huge help in
increasing job
opportunities.
Having a job
opportunity
near you will
87. 12. 10
help you save 349 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 400
2% 8% 0%
more time,
energy and
money.
Vertical
housing will
help to reduce 84. 15. 10
337 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 400
the impact of 2% 8% 0%
overpopulatio
n.
Vertical
housing is
one of the
best and
84 16 10
effective 336 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 400
% % 0%
solution in
preserving
natural
resources.
Building 345 86. 55 13. 0 0 0 0 0 0 400 10
vertically 2% 8% 0%
instead of
horizontally
will help us to
accommodate
vast amount
of people in a
small amount
of land and it
will also help
us to

Page 11
conserve land
and natural
resources.
Vertical cities
are the future 87. 12. 10
349 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 400
of urban 2% 8% 0%
living.
Vertical city is
the key in
solving 88 12 10
352 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 400
overpopulatio % % 0%
n and land
scarcity.
Lifestyle
center and
vertical
residences
88. 11. 10
will have a 355 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 400
7% 3% 0%
positive
impact in the
economy of
the city.
Vertical
developments
can help
87. 12. 10
reduce the 350 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 400
5% 5% 0%
traffic and
pollution if it is
well planned.
Vertical
housing can
help ease the 86. 13. 10
347 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 400
problem in 7% 3% 0%
population in
Metro Manila.
Being close to
nature can
help in
improving 88 12 10
352 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 400
one’s health, % % 0%
lifestyle,
efficiency and
productivity.
Table 16.
Frequency and percentage of MODERNO’s positive effects to the residents and
economy of Quezon City
The table shows the frequency and percentage of the date gathered
through survey questionnaire which tackles about the positive effects and
the needs of the project proposal. According to the response of the

Page 12
respondents and the table shown. The majority answer on the first
statement is Strongly Agree with a total vote of 312/78% of the overall
number of respondents, followed by Agree with total number of 88 votes
which is 12% of the total number of respondents, while no one vote for
Neutral, Disagree and Strongly Disagree. The majority of votes on second
statement goes for Strongly Agree with a total of 311 votes which is 77.7%
of the total respondents, followed by Agree with a total of 89 votes which is
22.3% of the total respondents followed by Neutral with zero vote, Disagree
with zero vote and Strongly Disagree with zero vote. The majority of the
respondents of the third statement vote for Strongly Agree with 349 votes
which is 87.2% of the total respondents followed by 51 votes which is
12.8% of the total respondents, followed by Neutral with zero vote,
Disagree with zero vote and Strongly Disagree with zero vote. Next is the
fourth statement, the majority of the votes goes to Strongly Agree with a
number of 337 votes which is 84.2% of the respondents followed by Agree
with a total number of 63 votes which is 15.8% of the total respondents,
followed by Neutral with zero vote, Disagree with zero vote and Strongly
Disagree with zero vote. Next is the fifth statement, the majority of the
votes goes to Strongly Agree with a number of 336 votes which is 84% of
the respondents followed by Agree with a total number of 64 votes which is
16% of the total respondents, followed by Neutral with zero vote, Disagree
with zero vote and Strongly Disagree with zero vote. Next is the sixth
statement, the majority of the votes goes to Strongly Agree with a number

Page 13
of 345 votes which is 86.2% of the respondents followed by Agree with a
total number of 55 votes which is 13.8% of the total respondents, followed
by Neutral with zero vote, Disagree with zero vote and Strongly Disagree
with zero vote. Next is the seventh statement, the majority of the votes
goes to Strongly Agree with a number of 349 votes which is 87.2% of the
respondents followed by Agree with a total number of 51 votes which is
eighth statement, the majority of the votes goes to Strongly Agree with a
number of 352 votes which is 88% of the respondents followed by Agree
with a total number of 48 votes which is 12% of the total respondents,
Disagree with zero vote. Next is the ninth statement, the majority of the
votes goes to Strongly Agree with a number of 355 votes which is 88.7% of
tenth statement, the majority of the votes goes to Strongly Agree with a
number of 350 votes which is 87.5% of the respondents followed by Agree
with a total number of 50 votes which is 12.5% of the total respondents,
Disagree with zero vote. Next is the eleventh statement, the majority of the
votes goes to Strongly Agree with a number of 347 votes which is 86.7% of

Page 14
last and twelfth statement, the majority of the votes goes to Strongly Agree
with a number of 352 votes which is 88% of the respondents followed by
Agree with a total number of 48 votes which is 12% of the total
respondents, followed by Neutral with zero vote, Disagree with zero vote
and Strongly Disagree with zero vote.
Weighted Mean of MODERNO’s positive effects to the residents
and economy of Quezon City.
Questions Sum Weighted Mean Interpretation

As the population
continue to increase
and the amount of
land for the amount
of land that can be
used for
development 1,912 4.78 Strongly Agree
decrease, vertical
housing is likely to
become more
prominent across
the cities around the
world.
Having a lifestyle
center/shopping
center and other
commercial
1,911 4.7775 Strongly Agree
establishments will
be a huge help in
increasing job
opportunities.
Having a job
opportunity near
you will help you 1,949 4.8725 Strongly Agree
save more time,
energy and money.
Vertical housing will 1,937 4.8425 Strongly Agree
help to reduce the
impact of

Page 15
overpopulation.
Vertical housing is
one of the best and
effective solution in 1,936 4.84 Strongly Agree
preserving natural
resources.
Building vertically
instead of
horizontally will help
us to accommodate
vast amount of
people in a small
amount of land and
it will also help us to
conserve land and
natural resources.
Vertical cities are
the future of urban 1,949 4.8725 Strongly Agree
living.
Vertical city is the
key in solving
overpopulation and
land scarcity.
Lifestyle center and
vertical residences
will have a positive 1,955 4.8875 Strongly Agree
impact in the
economy of the city.
Vertical
developments can
help reduce the 1,950 4.875 Strongly Agree
traffic and pollution
if it is well planned.
Vertical housing can
help ease the
problem in 1,947 4.8675 Strongly Agree
population in Metro
Manila.
Being close to
nature can help in
improving one’s
health, lifestyle,
efficiency and
productivity.
Grand Total
4.853125 Strongly Agree
Weighted Mean
Table 17.
Weighted Mean of MODERNO’s positive effects to the residents and economy of
Quezon City

Page 16
The table shows weighted mean that the majority of the respondents
are strongly agree to the statement provided on how this development will
provide positive impact to the residents and to the Local Government of
Quezon City with a grand total weighted mean of 4.853125. This conclude
that this study occurs helpful and will be a great asset to Quezon City.

Page 17

Rizal Technological University: College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rizal Technological University: College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology

Presentation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Data

from the researcher-made questionnaire, followed by the findings, analysis

and interpretation of data.

The results of the survey distributed to 400 respondents through the

1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents (Gender, Age, City of

Residence, Profession and Civil Status)

Gender - This table shows the Gender Frequency of the

respondents and its percentage.

Gender Frequency Percentage

Female 196 49%

Total 400 100%

Gender Frequency and Percentage of the Respondents

This data reflects the representative’s gender. The majority of the

number of 196 respondents are female. The total number of respondents is

MODERNO: Lifestyle Center and Vertical Residences in Quezon City

Age - The table below shows the frequency distribution and

percentage of the respondents based on age.

Age Frequency Percentage

Frequency and Percentage of the Respondent Based on Age

above with the total of 400 respondents.

City of Residence - The table present the frequency distribution

and percentage of the location of residency of the respondents.

Location Frequency Percentage

This figure shows where the respondents reside. It shows clearly

remaining 192 respondents are living outside Quezon City.

Profession - The table present the frequency distribution and

percentage of the residents based on profession.

Profession Frequency Percentage

Frequency and Percentage of the Respondent Based on Profession

This figure shows the profession of the respondents. It shows that

the majority of the respondents are employed with a number of 132,

followed by students with a number of 117, unemployed with a number of

87 and self-employed with a number of 64 with the total of 400

respondents based on civil status.

Civil Status Frequency Percentage

Frequency and Percentage of the Respondent Based on Civil Status

2. The Researcher-Made Questionnaire

Frequency and percentage of the respondents who

consider/don’t consider living near shopping centers and other

Response Frequency Percentage

Frequency and percentage of the respondents who consider/don’t consider living

near shopping centers and other commercial areas

The table shows the frequency and percentage of the respondents

the respondents considers living near shopping centers and other

commercial areas with a number of 398 out of 400 respondents.

Frequency and percentage of respondents who are familiar with

lifestyle centers and vertical housing.

Response Frequency Percentage

and vertical housing.

The table shows the frequency and percentage of the respondents

vertical housing with a number of 350 respondents and a number of 46

respondents with a slight knowledge about it and a total of 4 respondents

MODERNO: Lifestyle Center and Vertical Residences in Quezon City

Frequency and percentage of the respondents on how often

they visit shopping malls/centers

Response Frequency Percentage

The table shows the frequency and percentage of the respondents

shows that the majority of the respondents go to shopping malls and

shopping centers sometimes with a total number of 225 which is 56.2% of

the total number of respondents. The remaining respondents are divided