Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/349082565

Pumpkin Seed Oil vs. Minoxidil 5% Topical Foam for the Treatment of Female
Pattern Hair Loss: A Randomized Comparative Trial

Article  in  Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology · February 2021


DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13976

CITATIONS READS

0 470

4 authors, including:

Ibrahim M Ibrahim Mohamed Saeed Mohamed Hasan


Al-Azhar University Al-Azhar University
15 PUBLICATIONS   119 CITATIONS    10 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Mohamed L Elsaie
National Research Center, Egypt
121 PUBLICATIONS   1,402 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Individual research View project

Quality of life in with erectile dysfunction before and after sildenafil therapy View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Mohamed L Elsaie on 25 March 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


| |
Received: 6 November 2020    Revised: 4 January 2021    Accepted: 22 January 2021

DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13976

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Pumpkin seed oil vs. minoxidil 5% topical foam for the


treatment of female pattern hair loss: A randomized
comparative trial

Ibrahim M. Ibrahim MD1 | Mohamed S. Hasan MD1 | Khaled I. Elsabaa MSc1 |


Mohamed L. Elsaie MD2

1
Department of Dermatology, Al-­A zhar
University, Cairo, Egypt Abstract
2
Department of Dermatology, National Background: Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) is an annual climber plant, and its seeds
Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
have considerable amount of oil with nutritional and medicinal importance.
Correspondence Aim: The present study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of pumpkin seed oil
Mohamed L. Elsaie, Department of
(PSO) in the treatment of female pattern hair loss (FPHL) and compare its effects with
Dermatology, National Research Centre,
Nasr City 11371, Cairo, Egypt. minoxidil 5% foam.
Email: Egydoc77@yahoo.com
Methods: Patients with FPHL were randomly assigned to pumpkin seed oil (n = 30;
group A) or minoxidil 5% foam (n = 30; group B) for a period of 3 months. Patients
were evaluated clinically and dermoscopically at baseline, at one and half months,
and at the end of the 3-­month study.
Results: Among group A (pumpkin seed oil) candidates, a significant decrease was
observed in hair shaft diversity before and after treatment (30.5 ± 6.2%, 24.0 ± 4.02,
P < .001, respectively) as well as in the vellus hairs (22.5 ± 4.9, 15.8 ± 2.2, P < .001,
respectively). Upright regrowing hairs significantly increased from (0.13 ± 0.5) before
treatment to (0.9 ± 1.0) after treatment (P < .001). In group B (minoxidil applying)
candidates, a significant decrease was observed in hair shaft diversity before and
after treatment (31.5 ± 6.3%, 21.3 ± 2.2, P  < .001, respectively) as well as in the
vellus hairs (24.7 ± 6.4, 19.5 ± 5.4, P = .02, respectively). Conclusion Findings of the
present trial provide evidence of a promising potential role of PSO in treating FPHL.

KEYWORDS

dermoscopy, female pattern hair loss, minoxidil, pumpkin seed oil

1 |  I NTRO D U C TI O N hairline and less miniaturization in comparison with male pattern hair
loss (MPHL). 2
Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) is a prevalent hair disorder in fe- Clinical examination and inspections remain to be the golden di-
males. It usually starts at puberty with a progressive nonscarring agnostic standard along with other detection tools that aids in distin-
miniaturization of the hair follicle, with a characteristic pattern and guishing FPHL from other hair pathologies.3
1
distribution, that occurs in genetically predisposed women. Dermoscopy is a tool that helps with early diagnosis of FPHL and
Despite that FPHL peaks up after puberty, it can still appear in differentiating it from other hair loss conditions. Discrepancies and
younger ages. It involves the vertex, upper parietal scalp, and the heterogenicity in the hair shaft thickness are hallmark features seen
fronto-­parietal areas with a characteristic preservation of the frontal by dermoscopy in FPHL.4 Other criteria include increased vellus

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;00:1–7. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jocd© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC     1 |


|
2       IBRAHIM et al.

hairs (decreased terminal to vellus hair ratio), predominance of hair 2.2 | Inclusion criteria
follicular units with single hairs as well as yellow spots (hair follicles
filled with hyperkeratotic plugs).4 • Female patients with type 1 and 2 hair loss according to the
In recent years, a variety of plant extracts and botanicals had been Ludwig classification of female pattern hair loss (Ludwig, 1977).12
implicated in hair loss treatment. Serenoa repens, Pygeum africanum, • The age from 18 to 50 years.
Urtica dioica, Camellia sinensis, and polyphenols in green tea exhib-
ited 5α-­reductase inhibitory effect and promoted hair growth.5,6 In
one study, oral administration of 400 mg of pumpkin seed oil (PSO) for 2.3 | Exclusion criteria
24 weeks to men with androgenic baldness increased hair growth.7
Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) is an annual climber plant, and its • Female patients with type 3 pattern according to the Ludwig clas-
seeds have considerable amount of oil with nutritional and medicinal sification of female pattern hair loss.
importance. Moreover, pumpkin has antioxidant, anti-­inflammatory, • Patients with known hypersensitivity to pumpkin seed oil or
antimicrobial, cytoprotective, and antidiabetic effects.8,9 minoxidil.
Minoxidil though approved by the FDA in 1979 for the treatment • Pregnant and lactating females.
of hypertension was found to promote hair growth in male androge- • Recent medical treatment in the last three months.
netic alopecia (AGA) when applied topically. Solutions of 2% and 5% • Any associated disease of scalp.
minoxidil were approved for treating male AGA in 1988 and 1991.
In female pattern hair loss (FPHL), only the 2% solution was FDA-­
approved for use in 1991, and recently in 2014, the 5% foam was 2.4 | Methods
FDA-­approved for a once-­daily application.1
A number of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) in- Patients were divided into two groups:
cluding linoleic acid, linolenic acid, palmitic acid, and others are the
chief constituents of pumpkin seed oil (PSO). Moreover, PSO con- • Group A: 30 female patients with androgenic alopecia on topical
tains beta-­sitosterol, which actively inhibits 5α-­reductase enzyme.10 pumpkin seed oil.
Raynaud et al reported that linoleic acid also has inhibitory activity • Group B: 30 female patients with androgenic alopecia on topical
against 5α-­reductase.11 minoxidil.
Based on the abovementioned researches, the current study was
designed to investigate the clinical efficacy of PSO in the treatment All patients were subjected to the following:
of FPHL and compare its effects with the very widely used minoxidil Full history taking: Demographic data such as age, onset, course,
5% topical foam. duration, and medical history.
Clinical examination: For falling hair and its pattern.
Dermoscopic examination: The follicular openings, perifollicular
2 |  PATI E NT S A N D M E TH O DS discoloration, and hair shaft thickness were dermoscopically exam-
ined using DermLite 3.
2.1 | Study population

This study was conducted on 60 female patients with androgenic al- 2.4.1 | Procedure
opecia (diagnosed clinically and dermoscopically). The patients were
recruited from the dermatology department outpatient clinic from • Group A: Were instructed to apply 1 mL of topical pumpkin seed
December 2019 to August 2020. Informed consents were taken oil once daily and for three consecutive months.
from all subjects before enrollment in the study and were approved • Group B: Were instructed to apply 1 mL of minoxidil 5% foam
by the medical research ethics committee. once daily and for three consecutive months.

TA B L E 1   Age and disease duration


Group A Group B
among both group subjects
(N = 30) (N = 30) MW P-­value

Age (y) Mean ± SD 34.3 ± 9.5 30.9 ± 9.6 347.5 .129 NS


Median 31.5 28
Duration (y) Mean ± SD 2.1 ± 1.3 2.25 ± 1.2 391 .368 NS
Median 1.75 2

Note: MW: Mann-­Whitney test. NS: P-­value  > .05 is considered nonsignificant.


IBRAHIM et al.       3|
TA B L E 2   Comparison between studied
Group A (N = 30) Group B (N = 30) χ2 P-­value
groups as regard grade, onset, and course
Grade Grade I 25 83.3% 23 76.7% 0.41 .519 NS
Grade II 5 16.7% 7 23.3%
Onset Acute 0 0% 0 0% —­ —­
Gradual 30 100% 30 100%
Course Regressive 0 0% 0 0% —­ —­
Progressive 30 100% 30 100%

Note: χ2: Chi-­square test. NS: P-­value  > .05 is considered nonsignificant.

2.5 | Follow-­up and statistical analysis groups before treatment showed no significant difference (P > .05)
(Table 3).
Following the initial diagnostic visit, patients were followed up Among group A (pumpkin seed oil) candidates, a significant de-
using clinical and dermoscopic evaluation, one and half months crease was observed in hair shaft diversity before and after treat-
into the treatment and at 3 months following the start of treat- ment (30.5 ± 6.2%, 24.0 ± 4.02, P  < .001, respectively) as well as
ment. The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed in the vellus hairs (22.5 ± 4.9, 15.8 ± 2.2, P  < .001, respectively).
using Statistical Program for Social Science (SPSS) version 15.0. Upright regrowing hairs significantly increased from (0.13 ± 0.5) be-
Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation fore treatment to (0.9 ± 1.0) after treatment (P < .001). No signifi-
(SD), median, and IQR. Qualitative data were expressed as fre- cant decrease was observed in yellow dots and peripilar sign before
quency and percentage. (1.16 ± 2.2 and 29.3 ± 23.6) and after (0.9 ± 1.8 and 29.3 ± 23.6)
treatment (P > .05) (Table 4).
In group B (minoxidil applying) candidates, a significant decrease
3 | R E S U LT S was observed in hair shaft diversity before and after treatment
(31.5  ± 6.3%, 21.3 ± 2.2, P  < .001, respectively) as well as in the
In the present study, the mean age of studied patients in group A vellus hairs (24.7 ± 6.4, 19.5 ± 5.4, P  = .02, respectively). Upright
was 34.3 ± 9.5 years and 30.9 ± 9.6 years for group B (P = .129). The regrowing hairs significantly increased from (0.13 ± 0.5) before
mean duration of FPHL in the studied patients was 2.1 ± 1.3 years treatment to (2.03 ± 1.6) after treatment (P < .001). No significant
for group A and 2.25 ± 1.2 years for group B (P = .368). Table 1. decrease was observed in yellow dots and peripilar sign before
According to the Ludwig classification, 83.3% (25/30) of patients (1.10 ± 2.5 and 28.2 ± 18.7) and after (1.0 ± 2.3 and 28.2 ± 18.7)
in group A were grade 1 and 16.7% (5/30) were grade 2. Regarding treatment (P > .05) (Table 5).
group B, 76.7% (23/30) of patients were grade 1 and 23.3% (7/30) Following treatment, dermoscopic evaluation demonstrated a
were grade 2. The distribution of type 1 and type 2 FPHL in both more significant decrease in hair shaft diversity among group B (mi-
groups was of no significance (P = .519). In all patients, the hair loss noxidil applying) candidates compared with group A (PSO applying)
had an acute onset and a progressive course (Table 2). candidates (P = .004) as well as a significantly increased number of
Dermoscopic evaluation of hair shaft diversity, vellus hairs, up- regrowing hairs (P = .005) and a more significant decrease in vellus
right regrowing hairs, yellow dots, and peripilar signs among both hairs compared with those applying PSO (P = .004) (Table 6).

TA B L E 3   Dermoscopic changes
Group A Group B
between both groups before treatment
Dermoscopy before (N = 30) (N = 30) MW P-­value

Hair shaft diversity Mean ± SD 30.5 ± 6.2 31.5 ± 6.3 404 .465 NS


Median 30 30
Yellow dots Mean ± SD 1.16 ± 2.2 1.1 ± 2.5 436.5 .782 NS
Median 0.0 0.0
Peripilar sign Mean ± SD 29.3 ± 23.6 28.2 ± 18.7 436.5 .839 NS
Median 30 30
Vellus hair Mean ± SD 22.5 ± 4.9 24.7 ± 6.4 353.5 .132 NS
Median 20 25
Upright regrowing Mean ± SD 0.13 ± 0.5 0.13 ± 0.5 450 1.0 NS
hair Median 0.0 0.0

Note: MW: Mann-­Whitney test. NS: P-­value  > .05 is considered nonsignificant.


|
4       IBRAHIM et al.

TA B L E 4   Dermoscopic changes
Before After
among group A subjects before and after
Group A (N = 30) (N = 30) MW P-­value
treatment
Hair shaft diversity Mean ± SD 30.5 ± 6.2 24.0 ± 4.02 174.5 <.001 HS
Median 30 25
Yellow dots Mean ± SD 1.16 ± 2.2 0.9 ± 1.8 438.5 .818 NS
Median 0.0 0.0
Peripilar sign Mean ± SD 29.3 ± 23.6 29.3 ± 23.6 450 1.0 NS
Median 30 30
Vellus hair Mean ± SD 22.5 ± 4.9 15.8 ± 2.2 92.5 <.001 HS
Median 20 15
Upright regrowing Mean ± SD 0.13 ± 0.5 0.9 ± 1.0 233 <.001 HS
hair Median 0.0 1

Note: MW: Mann-­Whitney test. HS: P-­value  < .001 is considered highly significant.
NS: P-­value  > .05 is considered nonsignificant.
Bold values are Highly significant (HS).

TA B L E 5   Dermoscopic changes
Before After
among group B subjects before and after
Group B (N = 30) (N = 30) MW P-­value
treatment
Hair shaft diversity Mean ± SD 31.5 ± 6.3 21.3 ± 2.2 69 <.001 HS
Median 30 20
Yellow dots Mean ± SD 1.1 ± 2.5 1.0 ± 2.3 446.5 .941 NS
Median 0.0 0.0
Peripilar sign Mean ± SD 28.2 ± 18.7 28.2 ± 18.7 450 1.0 NS
Median 30 30
Vellus hair Mean ± SD 24.7 ± 6.4 19.5 ± 5.4 243 .002 S
Median 25 20
Upright regrowing Mean ± SD 0.13 ± 0.5 2.03 ± 1.6 142 <.001 HS
hair Median 0.0 2

Note: MW: Mann-­Whitney test. S: P-­value  < .05 is considered significant. HS: P-­value  < .001 is
considered highly significant. NS: P-­value  > .05 is considered nonsignificant.
Bold values are Highly significant (HS).

TA B L E 6   Dermoscopic changes among


Group A Group B
both groups after treatment
Dermoscopic changes (N = 30) (N = 30) MW P-­value

Hair shaft diversity Mean ± SD 24.0 ± 4.02 21.3 ± 2.2 280 .004 S


Median 25 20
Yellow dots Mean ± SD 0.9 ± 1.8 1 ± 2.3 440 .837 NS
Median 0.0 0.0
Peripilar sign Mean ± SD 29.3 ± 23.6 28.2 ± 18.7 436.5 .839 NS
Median 30 30
Vellus hair Mean ± SD 15.8 ± 2.2 19.5 ± 5.4 262.5 .004 S
Median 15 20
Upright regrowing Mean ± SD 0.9 ± 1.0 2.03 ± 1.6 268 .005 S
hair Median 1 2

Note: MW: Mann-­Whitney test. S: P-­value  < .05 is considered significant. NS: P-­value  > .05 is
considered nonsignificant.
Bold values are Highly significant (HS).
IBRAHIM et al. |
      5

F I G U R E 1   Female patient 23 y old


complaining of diffuse hair loss of 1-­year
clinical image (A) shows diffuse thinning
of the hair in the middle of the scalp
with preserved frontal hairline (grade 1
according to the Ludwig classification of
FPHL). Dermoscopy of first visit (DermLite
3 gen 10×) (B) shows hair shaft diversity
(blue arrows), peripilar sign (rectangle)
suggestive for androgenic alopecia, clinical
photograph after three months of follow-­
up (C). Dermoscopy after three months
of minoxidil therapy (D) shows increased
diameter of hair shafts and decreased hair
shaft diversity with presence of upright
regrowing hair (circle).

(A) (C)

(B) (D)

4 | D I S CU S S I O N Another single-­blinded comparative study demonstrated that


sesame and pumpkin seed oil are new safe effective treatment mo-
Botanical preparations have gained an increasing recent interest in dalities for alopecia areata with no statistically significant superior-
the treatment of many skin disorders among which are hair disor- ity to one another.16
13
ders including alopecias. The following study was designed to in- To our knowledge, no study has yet specifically investigated the
vestigate the clinical efficacy of PSO in the treatment of FPHL and efficacy of pumpkin seed oil in the treatment of FPHL. An animal
compare its effects with the widely prescribed minoxidil 5% topical model study reported that topical application of PSO reversed the
foam (Figures 1 and 2). testosterone-­induced retarded hair growth in mice.17 It was specu-
Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) belongs to the squash family and is rich lated that PSO exerts an anti-­androgen effect on both prostate and
in phytosterols that actively inhibits the conversion of testosterone hair follicles making it effective in treating benign prostatic hyper-
to dihydrotestosterone (DHT).14,15 One study compared the use of plasia (BPH) and hair loss in animal models. Whether this effect is
oral daily 400mgs of PSO to oral placebo in 76 patients with AGA mediated via inhibition of 5α-­reductase or as an antagonistic effect
and demonstrated a 40% increase in hair count among pumpkin seed at androgen receptors, is not clear and further investigations are
oil users.7 needed.17,18
|
6       IBRAHIM et al.

F I G U R E 2   Female patient 26 y


old complaining of diffuse hair loss of
1-­y duration clinical image (A) shows
diffuse thinning of the hair in the middle
of the scalp with preserved frontal
hairline (grade 1 according to Ludwig
classification of FPHL). Dermoscopy
of first visit (DermLite 3 gen 10×) (B)
shows hair shaft diversity (blue arrows),
suggestive for androgenic alopecia,
clinical photograph after three months
of follow-­up (C). Dermoscopy after three
months of pumpkin seed oil therapy (D)
shows increases diameter of hair shafts
and decreases hair shaft diversity with
presence of upright regrowing hair (circle)
and vellus hairs (rectangle).

(A) (C)

(B) (D)

Pumpkin seed oil is a rich source of unsaturated fatty acids, es- exhibited a higher significant efficacy to PSO and remains to be the
pecially oleic acid and linoleic acid. Such essential acids are reported gold standard treatment in FPHL. Moreover, the findings of the pre-
to inhibit 5α-­reductase, and hence, they might contribute to its hair sent trial provide evidence with respect to the efficacy of PSO oil in
growth potential via their anti-­androgen effects.14 the treatment of FPHL. Further research is warranted to identify the
Limitations of the trial included the small number of the study active ingredients and their mechanism of action.
population and the relatively short period of follow-­up. Moreover,
there was no histological confirmation of the hair changes no bio- DATA AVA I L A B I L I T Y S TAT E M E N T
chemical evaluation of DHT to assess its impact on AGA and its cor- Available upon request from authors.
relation to PSO use.
ORCID
Mohamed L. Elsaie  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7541-5241
5 |  CO N C LU S I O N
REFERENCES
The current study revealed significant improvement in both groups
1. Fabbrocini G, Cantelli M, Masarà A, Annunziata MC, Marasca C,
regarding hair shaft diversity, vellus hair, and upright regrowing hair. Cacciapuoti S. Female pattern hair loss: A clinical, pathophysiologic,
There was no difference in peripilar sign or yellow dots. Minoxidil and therapeutic review. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018;4(4):203-­211.
IBRAHIM et al. |
      7

2. Okereke UR, Simmons A, Callender VD. Current and emerging 12. Ludwig E. Classification of the types of androgenetic alopecia
treatment strategies for hair loss in women of color. Int J Womens (common baldness) occurring in the female sex. Br J Dermatol.
Dermatol. 2019;5(1):37-­45. 1977;97(3):247-­254.
3. Nagar R, Dhudshia R. Utility of trichoscopy to diagnose early female 13. Patsner B, Harti S. A Botanical Compound for the Treatment of
pattern hair loss in resource-­poor setting: A cross-­sectional study. Alopecia Areata and Chemotherapy-­Induced Alopecia. J Investig
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2019;85(6):681. Dermatol Symp Proc. 2020;20(1):S69-­S70.
4. Rakowska A, Slowinska M, Kowalska-­Oledzka E, Olszewska 14. Ashique S, Sandhu NK, Haque SN, Koley K. A Systemic Review
M, Rudnicka L. Dermoscopy in female androgenic alopecia: on Topical Marketed Formulations, Natural Products, and Oral
method standardization and diagnostic criteria. Int J Trichology. Supplements to Prevent Androgenic Alopecia: A Review. Nat Prod
2009;1(2):123-­130. Bioprospect. 2020;10:345-­365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1365​9-­
5. Shimizu K, Kondo R, Sakai K, Shoyama Y, Sato H, Ueno T. Steroid 020-­0 0267​-­9
5alpha-­reductase inhibitory activity and hair regrowth effects of 15. Hosking AM, Juhasz M, Atanaskova MN. Complementary and
an extract from Boehmeria nipononivea. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. Alternative Treatments for Alopecia: A Comprehensive Review.
2000;64(4):875-­877. Skin Appendage Disord. 2019;5(2):72-­89.
6. Lourith N, Kanlayavattanakul M. Hair loss and herbs for treatment. 16. Sharquie KE, Noaimi AA, Abass MS. Sesame and Pumpkin Seed
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2013;12(3):210-­222. Oil are New Effective Topical Therapies for Alopecia Areata. Am
7. Cho YH, Lee SY, Jeong DW, et al. Effect of pumpkin seed oil on hair J Dermatol Venereol. 2019;8(2):28-­ 32. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.
growth in men with androgenetic alopecia: a randomized, double-­ ajdv.20190​8 02.03
blind, placebo-­controlled trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 17. Hajhashemi V, Rajabi P, Mardani M. Beneficial effects of pumpkin
2014;2014:549721. seed oil as a topical hair growth promoting agent in a mice model.
8. Abarikwu SO, Oleribe AL, Mgbudom-­Okah CJ, Onuah CL, Avicenna J Phytomed. 2019;9(6):499-­504.
Chikwendu CS, Onyeike EN. The protective effect of fluted pump- 18. Hong H, Kim CS, Maeng S. Effects of pumpkin seed oil and saw
kin seeds against atrazine-­ induced testicular injury. Drug Chem palmetto oil in Korean men with symptomatic benign prostatic hy-
Toxicol. 2020;14:1-­11. perplasia. Nutr Res Pract. 2009;3(4):323-­327.
9. Salem AS, Ibrahim HS, Abdelaziz HH, Elsaie ML. Implications of
cigarette smoking on early-­onset androgenetic alopecia: A cross-­
sectional Study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/
How to cite this article: Ibrahim IM, Hasan MS, Elsabaa KI,
jocd.13727
Elsaie ML. Pumpkin seed oil vs. minoxidil 5% topical foam for
10. Cabeza M, Bratoeff E, Heuze I, Ramírez E, Sánchez M, Flores E.
Effect of beta-­sitosterol as inhibitor of 5 alpha-­reductase in ham- the treatment of female pattern hair loss: A randomized
ster prostate. Proc West Pharmacol Soc. 2003;46:153-­155. comparative trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;00:1–­7.
11. Raynaud JP, Cousse H, Martin PM. Inhibition of type 1 and type 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13976
5alpha-­reductase activity by free fatty acids, active ingredients of
Permixon. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;82(2-­3):233-­239.

View publication stats

You might also like