OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AN

Name of
Employee:
Position:
Department of
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

● Supervised regularly all 65 (and above)teachers are

school teaching personnel supervised and analyzed result
5 of supervision

BASIC KRA 1: 50-64 teachers are supervised

EDUCATION 4 and analyzed result of
SERVICES INSTRUCTIONAL supervision
LEADERSHIP
April 2017 to 35-49 teachers are supervised
10%
(40%) March 2018 3 with out analysing the
supervision result
20-34 teachers are
2 supervised with out analysing
supervision result

19 (and below) teachers

1 are supervised with out
analysing supervision result
● Managed Instructional System 100% of the instructional
supervisory plans were
5 implemented/achieved as
planned
85-99% of the instructional
supervisory plans were
4 implemented/achieved as
planned
70-84% of the instructional
supervisory plans were
April 2017 to 3 implemented/achieved as
10%
March 2018
planned
55-69% of the instructional
supervisory plans were
2 implemented/achieved as
planned

54%and below of the

instructional supervisory plans
1 were implemented/achieved as
planned
● Inspected regularly Daily 100% of the teachers submitted
Lesson Plans/ Logs neat and accurate DLP/DLL. As
(DLL) 5 reflected in a logbook or
monitoring sheet.
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

85-99% of the teachers

submitted neat and accurate
4 DLP/DLL.as reflected in a
logbook or monitoring sheet
70-84% of the teachers
submitted neat and accurate
April 2017 to 3 DLP/DLL. As refelcted in a
10%
March 2018
logbook or monitoring sheet
55-69% of the teachers
submitted neat and accurate
2 DLP/DLL.as reflected in a
logbook or monitoring sheet
54% and below of the teachers
submitted neat and accurate
1 DLP/DLL as reflected in a
logbook or monitoring sheet.

● Monitored teachers upkeep 100% of the learners records

of students records were analyzed and utilized
5
result for improvement

85-99% of the learners

4 records were analyzed and
utilized result for improvement
70-84% of the learners
April 2017 to records were analyzed and
10% 3
March 2018 utilized result for improvement

55-69 % of the learners

2 records were analyzed and
utilized result for improvement
54%and below of the learners
1 records were analyzed and
utilized result for improvement
● Provided a safe and child 100% of the classrooms were
friendly learning environment painted,lighted,well ventilated
for learners ,structured and secured as
5
supported by pictures
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

KRA 2: 85-99% of the classrooms were

LEARNING painted,lighted,well ventilated
ENVIRONMENT 4
,structured and secured as
supported by pictures
(15%)

70-84% of the classrooms were

painted,lighted,well ventilated
April 2017 to ,structured and secured as
5% 3
March 2018 supported by pictures

55-69% of the classrooms were

painted,lighted,well ventilated
2 ,structured and secured as
supported by pictures

54% and below of the

classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated
1 ,structured and secured as
supported by pictures

● Evaluated the school plant, Submitted valid,accurate and

physical facilities, safety and authentic physical plant
sufficiency with the 5 inventory and design
assistance of specialist proposals/ intervention

Submitted valid and accurate

physical plant inventory and
4 design proposals/ intervention

Submitted valid,accurate but not

authentic physical plant
3 inventory and design
April 2017 to proposals/ intervention
5%
March 2018

Submitted not accurate and

not authentic physical plant
2 inventory and without
proposals/ intervention
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

Submitted physical plant

inventory without
1 proposal/intervention

BASIC ● Formulated intervention Formulated 4 or more

EDUCATION program to determine the 5 intervention programs based
SERVICES strength, weakness, from the SWOT attached
opportunities, threats (SWOT)
of the school Formulated 3 or more
4 intervention programs based
from the SWOT attached
Formulated 2 or more
April 2017 to
5% 3 intervention programs based
March 2018 from the SWOT attached

Formulated 1 or more
intervention programs based
2
from the SWOT attached

Formulated no intervention
1 programs based from the
SWOT attached
● Organized and Conducted 4 or more school
conducted School-based based trainings/LAC Sessions
In-Service Training/LAC 5 within a year supported with
Sessions training matrix,attendance and
pictures
KRA 3: Conducted 3 school based
HUMAN trainings/LAC Sessions within a
RESOURCE 4 year supported with training
MANAGEMENT matrix,attendance and pictures
AND
DEVELOPMENT
Conducted 2 school based
(15%) April 2017 to trainings/LAC Sessions within a
4% 3 year supported with training
March 2018
matrix,attendance and pictures

Conducted 1 school based

trainings/LAC Sessions within a
2 year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

Organized but Conducted no

school based trainings/LAC
1 Sessions within a year.

● Assigned teachers where Assigned 100% of the teachers

they best fit to teach to the areas,grades they best fit
(grades/learning areas, special 5 within a year supported by
assignments) approved class program

Assigned 85-99% of the

teachers to the areas,grades
4 they best fit within a year
supported by approved class
program
Assigned 70-84% of the
teachers to the areas,grades
April 2017 to 3 they best fit within a year
4% supported by approved class
March 2018
program

Assigned 55- 69% of the

teachers to the areas,grades
2 they best fit within a year
supported by approved class
program
Assigned 54% and below of the
teachers to the areas,grades
1 they best fit within a year
supported by approved class
program
● Recommended and 100% of the teachers were
coordinated services for recommended for
the holistic development of 5 promotion/training /scholarship in
school personnel and a year
learners
85-99 % of the teachers were
recommended for
4
promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
70-84% of the teachers were
recommended for
April 2017 to 3
4% promotion/training /scholarship in
March 2018
a year
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

55-69% of the teachers were

recommended for
2 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year

54% and below of the

teachers were recommended
1 for promotion/training
/scholarship in a year
● Initiated and compiled 100% of the teachers have
teacher's professional 5 complete,neat ,accurate and
documents in authentic portfolio in a year
portfolios
85-99% of the teachers
4 have complete,neat,
auhentic and accurate
portfolio in a year
75-84% of the teachers
April 2017 to have complete,neat
3%
March 2018 3 ,accurate and authentic
portfolio in a year
55-69% of the teachers
2 have complete,neat
,accurate and authentic
portfolio in a year
54%and below of the teachers
1 have complete,neat ,accurate
and authentic portfolio in a year
BASIC ● Established linkages with Established 5 or more linkages
EDUCATION stakeholders 5 with stakeholders with MOA,
SERVICES MOU in a year.
KRA 4: Established 4 linkages with
PARENT'S stakeholders with MOA, MOU.
4 in a year.
INVOLVEMENT
AND COMMUNITY
PARTNERSHIPS Established 3 linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU.
(10%) April 2017 to 3 in a year.
2%
March 2018
Established 2 linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU.
2 in a year.
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

Established 1linkage with

stakeholder with MOA, MOU. in
1 a year.

● Met parents regularly to Met PTA 5 or more times

confer/inform about school in a year to discuss SRC
accomplishments 5 ,etc. supported by minutes,
agreements,attendance
sheets,pictures,etc.

Met PTA 4 times in a year too

discuss SRC, etc. supported by
4 minutes, agreements,attendance
sheets,pictures,etc.

Met PTA 3 times in a year to

April 2017 to discuss SRC, etc. supported by
2%
March 2018 3 minutes, agreements,attendance
sheets,pictures,etc.

Met PTA 2 times in a year to

discuss SRC, etc. supported by
2 minutes, agreements,attendance
sheets,pictures,etc.

Met PTA 1 time in a year to

discuss SRC, etc. supported by
1 minutes, agreements,attendance
sheets,pictures,etc.
● Designed programs/projects Designed 5 or more programs
with stakeholders to /projects with stakeholders to
address school needs address school needs based on
SWOT supported with program
5 design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc

Designed 4 programs /projects

with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT
supported with program
4 design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

Designed 3 programs /projects

with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT
April 2017 to supported with program
2%
March 2018 3 design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc

Designed 2 programs /projects

with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT
supported with program
2 design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc

Designed 1 program /project

with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT
1 supported with program
design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc

● Recognized accomplishments Awarded 20 or more

of stakeholders stakeholders during programs
5 within the school year fully
documented

Awarded 15 to 19
4 stakeholders during programs
at the end of the school year
fully documented
April 2017 to
2% Awarded 10 - 14 stakeholders
March 2018
3 during programs at the end of
the school year fully
documented
Awarded 5-9 stakeholders
2 during programs at the end of
the school year fully
documented
Awarded 4 and below
1 stakeholders during programs at
the end of the school year
● Mediated and ensured Resolved all conflicts within the
resolution of conflicts in 5 school level with complete
school documents
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

Resolved all conflicts within the

4 school level with incomplete
documents

conflicts not resolved within the

April 2017 to school level and reaches to
1% 3 district office with complete
March 2018
documents
all conflicts not resolved within
2 the school level reaches division
level with complete documents

all conflicts not resolved

1 within the school level with
complete documents

BASIC ● Formulated school policies Formulated 5 or more school

EDUCATION with stakeholders policies with the participation of
SERVICES 5 the stakeholders fully
documented

Formulated 4 school policies

with the participation of the
4 stakeholders fully documented

Formulated 3 school policies

with the participation of the
April 2017 to 3 stakeholders fully documented
1%
March 2018
Formulated 2 school policies
with the participation of the
2 stakeholders fully documented

Formulated 1school policy with

the participation of the
1 stakeholders fully documented

● Divide equally the teaching Prepared/submitted SF 7

loads to all school reflecting 6 loads with
teaching personnel 5 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

KRA 5: Prepared/submitted SF 7
SCHOOL reflecting 5 loads with
LEADERSHIP, 4 coordinatorships/clubs of the
MANAGEMENT teaching personnel approved by
AND OPERATIONS SDS within the school year.

(20%) Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 4 loads with
April 2017 to
4% 3 coordinatorships/clubs of the
March 2018 teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 3 loads with
2 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.

Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 6 loads with
1 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
● Led and led and implemented 5 or more
implemented educational programs, program
educational programs 5 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation
led and implemented 4
educational programs, program
4 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation

led and implemented 3

educational programs, program
April 2017 to 3 design is approved by SDS
March 2018
3% before the implementation

led and implemented 2

educational programs, program
2 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation

led and implemented 1

educational program, program
1 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

BASIC ● Performed School Leadership Submitted complete, accurate

EDUCATION and Management and ,authentic liquidation reports
SERVICES Operations Functions 5 monthly

Submitted complete, accurate

,authentic liquidation reports bi-
4 monthly

Submitted incomplete,
accurate ,authentic liquidation
April 2016 to 3 reports monthly
3%
March 2017

Submitted
incomplete,inaccurate ,not
2 authentic liquidation reports
monthly

Submitted
incomplete,inaccurate ,not
1 authentic liquidation reports bi-
monthly

● Requested and distributed 100% of the requested

instructional materials instructional materials were
distributed to teachers as
5 reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement
received by teachers.
85-99 % of the requested
instructional materials were
distributed to teachers as
4 reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement
received by teachers.
75-84% of the requested
instructional materials were
distributed to teachers as
April 2016 to 3 reflected in the SIP,APP and
3%
March 2017 summary of disbursement
received by teachers.
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

55-74% of the requested

instructional materials were
distributed to teachers as
2 reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement
received by teachers.

54% and below of the requested

instructional materials were
distributed to teachers as
1 reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement
received by teachers.

● Led the preparation of Crafted a doable, original ,need-

SIP/AIP/APP and ensured based SIP/AIP /APP and
participation of stakeholders ensured 100% participation of
5 internal and external
stakeholders approved by SDS
supported with documents

Crafted a doable, original ,need-

based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 85-99% participation of
4 internal and external
stakeholders approved by SDS
supported with documents

Crafted a doable, original ,need-

based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 75-84% participation of
3 internal and external
April 2016 to
4% stakeholders approved by SDS
March 2017
supported with documents

Crafted a doable, original ,need-

based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 55-74% participation of
2 internal and external
stakeholders approved by SDS
supported with documents
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AN
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERF
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY

Crafted a doable, original ,need-

based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 54% and below
participation of internal and
1 external stakeholders approved
by SDS supported with
documents

● Organized special classes Organized at least 4 special

for learners with special classes for learners with special
needs 5 needs with complete documents
(enrolment,teacher,needs)

Organized 3 special classes

for learners with special needs
4 with complete documents (
enrolment, teacher, needs)
Organized 2 special class for
April 2016 to learners with special needs with
3% 3 complete documents
March 2017
( enrolment, teacher, needs)
Organized 1 special class for
learners with special needs with
2 complete documents
( enrolment, teacher, needs)

Organized no special class for

1 learners with special needs.

100%

Ratee: Rater:

JEAN G.
Assistant Schools Div

Approving Authority:

HERRY MAE L. LIMBACO, PhD., CESO

Schools Division Superintendent
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Department of
Education/Misamis Oriental
OBJECTIVES
Supervised regularly all
school teaching personnel
Managed Instructional System
Inspected regularly Daily
Lesson Plans/ Logs (DLL)
Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
Position: Assistant Schools Div
Date of
Review:
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
65 (and above)teachers are 65 (and above) teachers are
supervised and analyzed result 65 (and above) teachers supervised in a month 1-5 days
5 of supervision were supervised monthly and before the schedule as per
were given TA per signed TA approved supervisory plan
forms
50-64 teachers are supervised 50-64 teachers were supervised 65 (and above) teachers are
4 and analyzed result of monthly and were given TA supervised in a month as
supervision per signed TA forms per approved supervisory
plan
April 2017 to 10% 35-49 teachers are supervised 35-49 teachers were supervised 50-64 teachers are supervised
March 2018
3 with out analysing the monthly and were given TA in a month as per approved
supervision result per signed TA forms supervisory plan
20-34 teachers are 20-34 teachers were 30-49 teachers are supervised
2 supervised with out analysing supervised monthly and were in a month as per approved
supervision result given TA per signed TA forms supervisory plan
19 (and below) teachers 19 and below teachers were 20 teachers and below are
1 are supervised with out supervised monthly and were supervised in a month as per
analysing supervision result given TA per signed TA forms approved supervisory plan
100% of the instructional 105% and above of Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were the supervisory plans supervisory plan and
5 implemented/achieved as were implemented in a accomplishment report before
planned month the deadline
85-99% of the instructional 100% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
4 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report on the
planned deadline
70-84% of the instructional 85-99% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
April 2017 to 3 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report 1 day
10%
March 2018 planned after the deadline
55-69% of the instructional 70-84% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
2 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report 2 days
planned after the deadline
54%and below of the 55-69% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
instructional supervisory plans were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
1 were implemented/achieved as accomplishment report 3 days
planned after the deadline
100% of the teachers submitted 100% of the DLP/DLL were
neat and accurate DLP/DLL. As inspected /checked before the
5 reflected in a logbook or scheduled time/date
monitoring sheet.
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

85-99% of the teachers 100% of the DLP/DLL were

submitted neat and accurate inspected /checked on the
4 DLP/DLL.as reflected in a scheduled time/date
logbook or monitoring sheet
70-84% of the teachers 100% of the DLP/DLL were
submitted neat and accurate inspected /checked one day
April 2017 to 3 DLP/DLL. As refelcted in a
10% after the scheduled time/date
March 2018
logbook or monitoring sheet
55-69% of the teachers 100% of the DLP/DLL were
submitted neat and accurate inspected /checked 2days after
2 DLP/DLL.as reflected in a the scheduled time/date
logbook or monitoring sheet
54% and below of the teachers 100% of the DLP/DLL were
submitted neat and accurate inspected /checked 3 days after
1 DLP/DLL as reflected in a the scheduled time/date
logbook or monitoring sheet.

Monitored teachers upkeep of 100% of the learners records Implemented 5 appropriate

Implemented the appropriate
students records were analyzed and utilized intervention on the anallyzed
5 intervention 1 month after
result for improvement result
having the analyzed result
85-99% of the learners Implemented 4 appropriate Implemented the appropriate
4 records were analyzed and intervention on the anallyzed intervention 2 month after
utilized result for improvement result having the analyzed result
70-84% of the learners Implemented 3 appropriate
April 2017 to records were analyzed and intervention on the anallyzed Implemented the appropriate
10% 3 intervention 3 month after
March 2018 utilized result for improvement result
having the analyzed result
55-69 % of the learners Implemented 2 appropriate Implemented the appropriate
2 records were analyzed and intervention on the anallyzed intervention 4 month after
utilized result for improvement result having the analyzed result
54%and below of the learners Implemented 1appropriate Implemented the appropriate
1 records were analyzed and intervention on the anallyzed intervention 5 month after
utilized result for improvement result having the analyzed result
Provided a safe and child 100% of the classrooms were 0% School Casualties 100% of the classrooms
friendly learning environment painted,lighted,well ventilated during Typhoons, school were painted,lighted,well
for learners ,structured and secured as events and others through ventilated
5
supported by pictures school-based DRRM ,structured and secured as
supported by pictures
1month before the opening
of classes

OBJECTIVES
Evaluated the school plant,
physical facilities, safety and
sufficiency with the assistance
of specialist
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
85-99% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated
4
,structured and secured as
supported by pictures
70-84% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated
April 2017 to ,structured and secured as
5% 3
March 2018 supported by pictures
55-69% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated
2 ,structured and secured as
supported by pictures
54% and below of the
classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated
1 ,structured and secured as
supported by pictures
Submitted valid,accurate and Conducted a bi- monthly
authentic physical plant School- based DRRM
5 inventory and design
proposals/ intervention
Submitted valid and accurate
physical plant inventory and
4 design proposals/ intervention
Submitted valid,accurate but not Conducted a quarterly School-
authentic physical plant
3 inventory and design
April 2017 to proposals/ intervention
5%
March 2018
Submitted not accurate and
not authentic physical plant
2 inventory and without
proposals/ intervention
EFFICIENCY
10% School Casualties during
Typhoons, school events and
others through school-based
DRRM
20% School Casualties during
Typhoons, school events and
others through school-based
DRRM
30% School Casualties during
Typhoons, school events and
others through school-based
DRRM
40% School Casualties during
Typhoons, school events and
others through school-based
DRRM
Conducted a monthly School-
based DRRM
based DRRM
Conducted twice a year School- Submitted valid,accurate and
based DRRM
TIMELINESS
100% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated
,structured and secured as
supported by pictures during the
opening of classes
100% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated
,structured and secured as
supported by pictures 2months
after the opening of classes
100% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated
,structured and secured as
supported by pictures 3months
after the opening of classes
100% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated
,structured and secured as
supported by pictures 4month
after the opening of classes
Submitted valid,accurate and
authentic physical plant
inventory before the deadline
supported by the transmital
Submitted valid,accurate and
authentic physical plant
inventory on the deadline
supported by the transmital
Submitted valid,accurate and
authentic physical plant
inventory 1 day after the
deadline supported by the
transmital
authentic physical plant
inventory 2 days after the
deadline supported by the
transmital

OBJECTIVES
Formulated intervention
program to determine the
strength, weakness,
opportunities, threats (SWOT)
of the school
Organized and conducted
School-based In-Service
Training/LAC Sessions
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
Submitted physical plant
inventory without
1 proposal/intervention
Formulated 4 or more
5 intervention programs based
from the SWOT attached
Formulated 3 or more
4 intervention programs based
from the SWOT attached
Formulated 2 or more
April 2017 to
March 2018
5% 3 intervention programs based
from the SWOT attached
Formulated 1 or more
intervention programs based
2
from the SWOT attached
Formulated no intervention
1 programs based from the
SWOT attached
Conducted 4 or more school
based trainings/LAC Sessions
5 within a year supported with
training matrix,attendance and
pictures
Conducted 3 school based
trainings/LAC Sessions within a
4 year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures
Conducted 2 school based
April 2017 to trainings/LAC Sessions within a
4%
March 2018 3 year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures
Conducted 1 school based
trainings/LAC Sessions within a
2 year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures
EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
Conducted once a year School- Submitted valid,accurate and
based DRRM authentic physical plant
inventory 3 days after the
deadline supported by the
transmital
Formulated and Conducted 4 or Formulated the intervention
more interventions programs programs based from the
based on SWOT attached. SWOT attached 1 month after
Formulated and Conducted 3 Formulated the intervention
interventions programs based programs based from the
on SWOT attached. SWOT attached 2 months
after
Formulated and Conducted 2 Formulated the intervention
interventions programs based programs based from the
on SWOT attached. SWOT attached 3 months
after
Formulated and Conducted 1 Formulated the intervention
intervention program based on programs based from the
SWOT attached. SWOT attached 4months
after
Formulated and Conducted Formulated the intervention
no intervention program programs based from the
based on SWOT attached. SWOT attached 5 months
after
Conducted 4 or more school Conducted 4 or more school
based trainings/LAC Sessions based trainings/LAC Sessions
within a year supported with within a year supported with
training matrix,attendance and training matrix,attendance and
pictures using other funds. pictures before INSET Schedule
Conducted 3 school based Conducted 4 or more school
trainings/LAC Sessions within a based trainings/LAC Sessions
year supported with training within a year supported with
matrix,attendance and pictures training matrix,attendance and
using other funds pictures during October INSET
Conducted 2 school based Conducted 4 or more school
trainings/LAC Sessions within a based trainings/LAC Sessions
year supported with training within a year supported with
matrix,attendance and pictures training matrix,attendance and
using other funds pictures during summer INSET
Conducted 1 school based
trainings/LAC Sessions within a
year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures
using other funds.
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

Organized but Conducted no Conducted no school based

school based trainings/LAC trainings/LAC Sessions within a
1 Sessions within a year. year using other funds.

Assigned teachers where they Assigned 100% of the teachers Performs 3 ancillary services
best fit to teach to the areas,grades they best fit on top of the regular teaching Printed and submitted hard
(grades/learning areas, special 5 within a year supported by loads with high mastery level copies of the approved class
assignments) approved class program program before deadline

Assigned 85-99% of the Performs 2 ancillary services

teachers to the areas,grades on top of the regular teaching Printed and submitted hard
4 they best fit within a year loads with high mastery level copies of the approved class
supported by approved class program on the deadline
program
Assigned 70-84% of the Performs 1 ancillary service on
teachers to the areas,grades top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
April 2017 to 3 they best fit within a year with high mastery level copies of the approved class
4% supported by approved class
March 2018 program 1 day after the
program deadline
Assigned 55- 69% of the Performs regular teaching
teachers to the areas,grades loads with high mastery level Printed and submitted hard
copies of the approved class
2 they best fit within a year with high mastery level
supported by approved class program 2-3 days after the
program deadline

Assigned 54% and below of the Performs regular teaching loads

teachers to the areas,grades with average mastery level Printed and submitted hard
copies of the approved class
1 they best fit within a year
supported by approved class program 4-5 days after the
program deadline

Recommended and 100% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations

coordinated services for the recommended for before the dealine
holistic development of school 5 promotion/training /scholarship in
personnel and learners a year
85-99 % of the teachers were Submitted recommendations on
recommended for the the dealine
4
promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
70-84% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations 1
recommended for day after the dealine
April 2017 to 3
4% promotion/training /scholarship in
March 2018
a year
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

55-69% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations 2

recommended for days after the dealine
2 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year

54% and below of the Submitted recommendations 3

teachers were recommended days after the dealine
1 for promotion/training
/scholarship in a year
Initiated and compiled 100% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,
teacher's professional 5 complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
documents in authentic portfolio in a year portfolio before March 2017
portfolios
85-99% of the teachers Complied complete ,neat ,
4 have complete,neat, accurate and authentic
auhentic and accurate teacher's portfolio first week of
portfolio in a year March 2017
75-84% of the teachers Complied complete ,neat ,
April 2017 to have complete,neat accurate and authentic teacher's
3%
March 2018 3 ,accurate and authentic portfolio second week of March
portfolio in a year 2017
55-69% of the teachers Complied complete ,neat ,
2 have complete,neat accurate and authentic
,accurate and authentic teacher's portfolio 3rd week of
portfolio in a year March 2017
54%and below of the teachers Complied complete ,neat ,
1 have complete,neat ,accurate accurate and authentic teacher's
and authentic portfolio in a year portfolio on April 2017
Established linkages with Established 5 or more linkages Established linkages with
stakeholders 5 with stakeholders with MOA, stakeholders with MOA, MOU
MOU in a year. in the start of the school year.
Established 4 linkages with Established linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU. stakeholders with MOA, MOU
4 in a year. in the first quarter of the
school year.
Established 3 linkages with Established linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU. stakeholders with MOA, MOU
April 2017 to 3 in a year. in the 2nd quarter of the
2%
March 2018 school year.
Established 2 linkages with Established linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU. stakeholders with MOA, MOU
2 in a year. in the 3rd quarter of the
school year.
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

Established 1linkage with Established linkages with

stakeholder with MOA, MOU. in
1 a year.
Met parents regularly to Met PTA 5 or more times
confer/inform about school in a year to discuss SRC
accomplishments 5 ,etc. supported by minutes,
agreements,attendance
sheets,pictures,etc.
90%-100% Parents' Attendance
during PTA Meeting
stakeholders with MOA, MOU
in the 4th quarter of the
school year.
Conducted the meetings in
advance of the schedule under
D.O. 25, s. 2017

Met PTA 4 times in a year too 79%-89% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting within the schedule under
4 minutes, agreements,attendance D.O. 25, s. 2017
sheets,pictures,etc.

Met PTA 3 times in a year to 59%-78% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings a week
April 2017 to discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O.
2%
March 2018 3 minutes, agreements,attendance 25, s. 2017
sheets,pictures,etc.

Met PTA 2 times in a year to 39%-58% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 2
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting weeks after the schedule
2 minutes, agreements,attendance under D.O.
sheets,pictures,etc. 25, s. 2017

Met PTA 1 time in a year to 10%-38% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 3
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting weeks after the schedule under
1 minutes, agreements,attendance D.O. 25, s. 2017
sheets,pictures,etc.
Designed programs/projects Designed 5 or more programs Implemented 5 or more Implemented programs /projects
with stakeholders to /projects with stakeholders to programs /projects with with stakeholders to address
address school needs address school needs based on stakeholders to address school school needs based on SWOTa
SWOT supported with program needs based on SWOT week after the approval of the
5 design,minutes/agreements, supported with program design, supported with program
pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc pictures,etc

Designed 4 programs /projects Implemented 4 programs Implemented programs

with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT
supported with program
4 design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
/projects with stakeholders to
address school needs based on
SWOT supported with program
design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
/projects with stakeholders to
address school needs based
on SWOT,2 weeks after the
approval of the design,
supported with program
design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

Designed 3 programs /projects Implemented 3 programs Implemented programs

with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT
April 2017 to supported with program
2%
March 2018 3 design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
Designed 2 programs /projects
with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT
supported with program
2 design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
Designed 1 program /project
with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT
1 supported with program
design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
Recognized accomplishments Awarded 20 or more
of stakeholders stakeholders during programs
5 within the school year fully
documented
/projects with stakeholders to /projects with stakeholders to
address school needs based on address school needs based
SWOT supported with program on SWOT, a month after the
design,minutes/agreements, approval of the design,
pictures,etc supported with program
design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
Implemented 2 programs Implemented programs
/projects with stakeholders to /projects with stakeholders to
address school needs based on address school needs based
SWOT supported with program on SWOT, 2 months after the
design,minutes/agreements, approval of the design,
pictures,etc supported with program
design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
Implemented 1 program /project Implemented programs
with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to
school needs based on SWOT address school needs based
supported with program on SWOT, 3months after the
design,minutes/agreements, approval of the design,
pictures,etc supported with program
design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders every
awards of less cost using funds end of the activity/project
outside from
MOOE/PTA/Teachers

Awarded 15 to 19 Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders during

4 stakeholders during programs awards of less cost using funds assembly every end of the
at the end of the school year from PTA grading period
fully documented
April 2017 to
2% Awarded 10 - 14 stakeholders Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders during
March 2018
3 during programs at the end of awards of less cost using funds education week celebration
the school year fully from MOOE
documented
Awarded 5-9 stakeholders Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders at the
2 during programs at the end of awards of high cost end of March
the school year fully
documented
Awarded 4 and below Use most expensive awards Awarded stakeholders during
1 stakeholders during programs at of high cost using funds from bregada eskwela .
the end of the school year the teacher.
Mediated and ensured Resolved all conflicts within the Resolved conflicts before it is
resolution of conflicts in 5 school level with complete filed in the school level
school documents
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
Resolved all conflicts within the
4 school level with incomplete
documents
conflicts not resolved within the
April 2017 to school level and reaches to
1% 3 district office with complete
March 2018
documents
all conflicts not resolved within
2 the school level reaches division
level with complete documents
all conflicts not resolved
1 within the school level with
complete documents
Formulated school policies Formulated 5 or more school
with stakeholders policies with the participation of
5 the stakeholders fully
documented
Formulated 4 school policies
with the participation of the
4 stakeholders fully documented
Formulated 3 school policies
with the participation of the
April 2017 to 3 stakeholders fully documented
1%
March 2018
Formulated 2 school policies
with the participation of the
2 stakeholders fully documented
Formulated 1school policy with
the participation of the
1 stakeholders fully documented
Divide equally the Prepared/submitted SF 7
teaching loads to all reflecting 6 loads with
school teaching personnel 5 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
EFFICIENCY
100% of the teachers
garnered awards as
coordinators on top of their
teaching loads.
TIMELINESS
Resolved conflicts after it is filed
in the school level
Resolved conflicts in two
hearings after it is filed in
the school level
Resolved conflicts in three
hearings after it is filed in
the school level
Resolved conflicts in four
hearings after it is filed in
the school level
Formulated school policies with
the participation of the
stakeholders fully documented
before the start of classes
Formulated school policies with
the participation of the
stakeholders fully documented
during the start of classes
Formulated school policies with
the participation of the
stakeholders fully documented
a month after the start of
classes
Formulated school policies with
the participation of the
stakeholders fully documented
two months after the start of
classes
Formulated school policies with
the participation of the
stakeholders fully documented
three months after the start of
classes
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting loads with
coordinatorships of teachers
approved by SDS 10 days
before the deadline
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of
Department of Education/Misamis Oriental
Review:
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 5 loads with
4 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 4 loads with
April 2017 to
4% 3 coordinatorships/clubs of the
March 2018 teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 3 loads with
2 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 6 loads with
1 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
Led and implemented led and implemented 5 or more
educational programs educational programs, program
5 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation
led and implemented 4
educational programs, program
4 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation
led and implemented 3
educational programs, program
April 2017 to 3 design is approved by SDS
3% before the implementation
March 2018
led and implemented 2
educational programs, program
2 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation
led and implemented 1
educational program, program
1 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation
EFFICIENCY
85-99% of the teachers
garnered awards as
coordinators on top of their
teaching loads.
70-84% of the teachers
garnered awards as
coordinators on top of their
teaching loads.
55-69% of the teachers
garnered awards as
coordinators on top of their
teaching loads.
54%and below of the teachers
garnered awards as
coordinators on top of their
teaching loads.
Addressed 100% of the
identified school problems
supported by accomplishment
report and noted by SDS
Addressed 85% - 99% of the
identified school problems
supported by accomplishment
report and noted by SDS
Addressed 70% - 84% of the
identified school problems
supported by accomplishment
report and noted by SDS
Addressed 55% - 69% of the
identified school problems
supported by accomplishment
report and noted by SDS
Addressed 54% and below of
the identified school problems
supported by accomplishment
report and noted by SDS
JEAN G. VELOSO
Assistant Schools Div
TIMELINESS
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting loads with
coordinatorships of teachers
approved by SDS 5 days before
the deadline
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting loads with
coordinatorships of teachers
approved by SDS on the
deadline
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting loads with
coordinatorships of teachers
approved by SDS 5 days after
the deadline
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting loads with
coordinatorships of teachers
approved by SDS 10 days after
the deadline
Submitted Accomplishment
Report before the date spicified
in the approved implementation
plan
Submitted Accomplishment
Report on the date spicified in
the approved implementation
plan
Submitted Accomplishment
Report 1day after the date
spicified in the approved
implementation plan
Submitted Accomplishment
Report 2 days after the date
spicified in the approved
implementation plan
Submitted Accomplishment
Report 3 days after the date
spicified in the approved
implementation plan
 Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

Performed School Leadership Submitted complete, accurate Submitted liquidation report Submitted complete, accurate
and Management and ,authentic liquidation reports together with Cash advance for ,authentic liquidation reports 3
Operations Functions 5 monthly the next month with no instance days before the deadline
of unliquidated CA.

Submitted complete, accurate Submitted liquidation report Submitted complete, accurate

,authentic liquidation reports bi- without CA for the next month ,authentic liquidation reports 2
4 monthly with no instance of unliquidated days before the deadline
CA
Submitted incomplete, Submitted liquidation report; or Submitted complete, accurate
accurate ,authentic liquidation both Cash advance for the ,authentic liquidation reports 1
April 2016 to 3 reports monthly next month with one days before the deadline
3%
March 2017 instances of unliquidated CA

Submitted Submitted liquidation report; or Submitted complete, accurate

incomplete,inaccurate ,not both Cash advance for the ,authentic liquidation reports on
2 authentic liquidation reports next month with two instances the deadline
monthly of unliquidated CA

Submitted Submitted liquidation report ; Submitted complete, accurate

incomplete,inaccurate ,not or bjoth Cash advance for the ,authentic liquidation reports 1-3
1 authentic liquidation reports bi- next month with three days after the deadline
monthly instances of unliquidated CA

Requested and distributed 100% of the requested
instructional materials instructional materials were
distributed to teachers as
5 reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement
received by teachers.
85-99 % of the requested
instructional materials were
distributed to teachers as
4 reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement
received by teachers.
75-84% of the requested
instructional materials were
April 2016 to distributed to teachers as
3%
March 2017 3 reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement
received by teachers.
100% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials according to teachers immediately after
to the needs of the teachers the delivery .
as reflected in the SIP,APP
and summary of
disbursement received by
teachers.
85-99% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials according to teachers a day after the
to the needs of the teachers delivery .
as reflected in the SIP,APP
and summary of
disbursement received by
teachers.
75-84% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials according to teachers 2 days after the
to the needs of the teachers delivery .
as reflected in the SIP,APP
and summary of
disbursement received by
teachers.
 Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

55-74% of the requested 55-74% of the requested Distributed instructional materials

instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers 3 days after the
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers delivery .
2 reflected in the SIP,APP and as reflected in the SIP,APP
summary of disbursement and summary of
received by teachers. disbursement received by
teachers.
54% and below of the requested 54% and below of the Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were requested instructional materials to teachers 4 days after the
distributed to teachers as according to the needs of the delivery .
1 reflected in the SIP,APP and teachers as reflected in the
summary of disbursement SIP,APP and summary of
received by teachers. disbursement received by
teachers.
Led the preparation of Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
SIP/AIP/APP and ensured based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
participation of stakeholders ensured 100% participation of ensured participation of ensured participation of internal
5 internal and external internal and external and external stakeholders
stakeholders approved by SDS stakeholders without revision before the deadline
supported with documents on SIP /AIP and APP.

Crafted a doable, original ,need-
based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 85-99% participation of
4 internal and external
stakeholders approved by SDS
supported with documents
Submitted a doable, original
,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured participation of internal
and external stakeholders
without revision on SIP and AIP.
And revision on APP.
Submitted a doable, original
,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured participation of internal
and external stakeholders on
the deadline

Crafted a doable, original ,need-
based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 75-84% participation of
3 internal and external
April 2016 to
4% stakeholders approved by SDS
March 2017
supported with documents
Submitted a doable, original
,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured participation of internal
and external stakeholders with
revisions on the two
Submitted a doable, original
,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured participation of internal
and external stakeholders 1 day
after the deadline

Crafted a doable, original ,need-
based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 55-74% participation of
2 internal and external
stakeholders approved by SDS
supported with documents
Submitted a doable, original
,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured participation of internal
and external stakeholders with
revisions on the three
Submitted a doable, original
,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured participation of internal
and external stakeholders 2
days after the deadline
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Rater: Position: JEAN G. VELOSO
Date of Review: Assistant Schools Div

Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original

based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 54% and below ensured participation of internal
participation of internal and and external stakeholders 3
1 external stakeholders approved days after the deadline
by SDS supported with
documents

Organized special classes for Organized at least 4 special Conducted at least 4 special Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs classes for learners with special classes for learners with special with special needs at the start of
5 needs with complete documents needs the school year.
(enrolment,teacher,needs)

Organized 3 special classes Conducted at least 3 special Conducted classes for

for learners with special needs classes for learners with special learners with special needs a
4 with complete documents ( needs week after the start of the
enrolment, teacher, needs) school year.
Organized 2 special class for Conducted at least 2 special Conducted classes for learners
April 2016 to learners with special needs with classes for learners with special with special needs two weeks
3% 3 complete documents
March 2017 needs after the start of the school year.
( enrolment, teacher, needs)
Organized 1 special class for Conducted 1 special classes Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs with for learners with special needs with special needs a month after
2 complete documents with no documents the start of the school year.
( enrolment, teacher, needs)

Organized no special class for non-compliant Conducted classes for learners

1 learners with special needs. with special needs two
months after the start of the
school year.
100%
L
Rater: E
JEAN G. VELOSO
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

Approving
Authority:
HERRY MAE L. LIMBACO, PhD., CESO
Schools Division Superintendent
 CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR
OPCRF
( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
● Supervised and directed all Instructional Supervisory Plan (Completed Monthly,stamped received in the Division
KRA 1: school teaching & non-teaching Office on the target date.
personnel
INSTRUCTION ● Managed Instructional System
AL Instructional Supervision Form and /or Clinical observation sheets compiled
monthly
LEADERSHIP
● Inspected regularly Daily Instructional Accomplishment Reports in the form of Individual Teacher
Lesson Logs (DLL) Teaching Performance Record (ITTPR)
Teacher Observed and Given Assistance( TOGA) complied monthly
,stamped received in the Division Office on the Target date.

● Monitored teachers upkeep Report comparative NAT RESULT (Graphical Presentation of previous and
of students records present results showing comparison)

● Provided a safe and child Child Friendly School Survey

KRA 2: friendly learning environment Child Protection Policy
for learners Scouting
Feeding Program
SCHOOL Health Care Package
RESOURCE Athletics
MANAGEMEN Religious Instruction
T
● Evaluated the school plant, School Building Inventory
physical facilities, safety and DRRM Mobilization Plan
sufficiencywith the assistance of Fire Insurance
specialist School Report Card
Classroom Structuring
Updated EBEIS
Child Protection Policy
School Site Development Plan
School Ownership
School Policy Development

● Formulated intervention prorgram Performance Indicators

to determine the strength, Fire Drill
weakness, opportunities, threats Eartquake Drill
(SWOT) of the school School Watching List
School Deworming Report
School Immunization Report
Brigada Eskwela
Schoo-Based Management
Continuous Improvemement (CI) Projects

● Supervised and directed all Teacher's Portfolio

KRA 3: school teaching and non- a) Observation Sheets
teaching personnel b) TSNA Result
HUMAN c) IPPD
RESOURCE
MANAGEMEN ● Organized and conducted In-Service Report on Training conducted in school
T AND Training a) Memorandum of In-Service Training
DEVELOPMEN b) Training Matrix and Design
T c) Attendance Sheet
 ( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
d) Narrattive Report and Pictures

● Assigned teachers where they SF 7

best fit to teach (grades/learning Form 201
areas, special assignments) DHRIS

● Promoted and coordinated services List of teachers recommended for promotion with approved ERF
for the holistic development of List of teachers promoted
school personnel and learners List of teachers sent as trainers, coaches, chaperons or coordinators

● Initiated and compiled teacher's Teacher's Portfolio

professional documents in DHRIS
portfolios List of teachers promoted

● Established linkages with Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

KRA 4: stakeholders MOA
Resolution
PARENT'S Projects Implemented
INVOLVEMENT Brigada Eskwela
AND BSP/GSP
COMMUNITY Participation Community Activities
PARTNERSHIP
S
● Met parents regularly to Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials
confer/inform about school Quarterly Conferences
accomplishments Narrative Report
SOSA (Accomplishment Reports, SRC, Financial Report)

● Designed programs with ESIP

stakeholders to address AIP
schoo needs School Development Plan
Strategic Plan
Accomplishment Report
Pictorials

● Recognized accomplishments of Certificate of Appreciation/Recognition

stakeholders Program of Activities (Stakeholderr's Day, Team Building)
Narrattive Report
Pictorials

● Promoted welfare of stakeholders Action Plan

School Policies
Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

● Mediated and ensured resolution School Mediation Committee (Organizational Structure)

of conflicts in school School Grievance Committee
Anectdotal Record
School Case Record
Narrative Report
Pictorials

● Formulated school policies Stakeholders Constitution and by Laws

with stakeholders Handbook
 ( / or
KRA's OBJECTIVES
● Harnessed participation of
alumni and other organization
(NGO's, LGU's, PPP)
● Supervised and directed all
KRA 5: school teaching and non-
teaching personnel
SCHOOL ● Led and implemented
LEADERSHIP, educational programs
MANAGEMEN
T AND
OPERATIONS
● Directed, coordinated nad managed
school funds according to
prioritizes needs
● Requested and distributed
instructional materials
● Led the preparation of SIP/AIP
and ensured participation of
stakeholders
● Organized special classes
for learners with special
needs
REMARKS /
x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials
Alumni Organizational Structure
Alumni Activities
Membership Records, Financial Reords
Projects Implemented
Accomplishment Report
Class Porgram
Coordinatorships and Clubs
DropOut Reduction Program
IPED
Reading Program
Alternative Delivery Mode
GAD
Request for Cash Advances
Liquidation Reports
Purchase Request
Requisition and Issue Slip
Logbook
Accomplished AIP, SIP
Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials
List of learners with special needs
School Form 1, SF-2, SF-5, SF-6
Learning Modules and Materials