Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bmj.e5191 GMC Duplicity Wilmshurst
Bmj.e5191 GMC Duplicity Wilmshurst
BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.e5191 on 6 August 2012. Downloaded from http://www.bmj.com/ on 22 March 2019 by Barbara Denise Steele. Protected by copyright.
Letters
LETTERS
Advice from the General Medical Council (GMC) on “Protecting The GMC’s advice on whistleblowing resonates with its advice
children and young people” is at variance with its conduct, and on reporting suspected child abuse, but the GMC and medical
the response of the medical establishment is muddled.1 The establishment have destroyed the careers of whistleblowers. Yet
GMC destroyed the careers of paediatricians who exposed child when a GMC member had concealed from the GMC and from
abuse, but it allowed about 100 doctors who were convicted of the police fraud committed by another doctor, the GMC ignored
accessing child pornography on the internet to remain on the its own advice on reporting misconduct and the legal advice
medical register. The GMC allowed one gynaecologist to from its solicitors. It refused to act against the GMC member
continue in practice after being placed on the Sex Offenders and allowed him to continue sitting on the panel that hears cases
Register for that offence, but his trust restricted his clinical of alleged misconduct by other doctors.2
activities. Eighteen months later he received a silver clinical I have reported concerns to the GMC for 30 years. Some cases
excellence award (CEA). He must have been nominated by his are current. I discern no change in the “club culture,” with the
trust and the Advisory Committee for Clinical Excellence GMC “looking after its own” as Janet Smith reported.3
Awards must have checked whether the GMC had concerns
about his character. How can such a doctor be awarded a Competing interests: PTW has a silver clinical excellence award.
national CEA?
The GMC provides advice about research misconduct but allows 1 Dyer C. Every doctor has a duty to report suspected child abuse or neglect, says GMC.
BMJ 2012;345:e4719. (10 July.)
professors who falsify clinical research to get off without 2 Wilmshurst P. Dishonesty in medical research. Med Leg J 2007;75:3-12.
meaningful punishment. Those professors invariably retain the 3 Shipman Inquiry. www.shipman-inquiry.org.uk/reports.asp.
national CEAs that they obtain by falsifying research.
Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e5191
© BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2012
peter.wilmshurst@tiscali.co.uk
For personal use only: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Subscribe: http://www.bmj.com/subscribe